Embodiments relate to the manufacture of flame detector tubes and vacuum tubes. Embodiments also relate to sputtering, gettering, vacuum chambers, manifolds, and process gas delivery systems.
Vacuum tubes, the predecessors of transistors and diodes, are air tight chambers with cathodes and anodes. The air is largely evacuated from the tube, hence the name vacuum tube. The tube's cathode is held at a lower voltage than the tube's anode so that electrons are accelerated from the cathode to the anode. As electrons move to the anode, they collide with air molecules knocking even more electrons loose and thereby amplifying the number of electrons. In many tubes, the cathode is heated to produce thermionic electrons. In other tubes, photons are allowed to impact the cathode to cause the release of photoelectrons.
Vacuum tubes are rarely used in circuitry any more. They are, however, often used in light detection. Some tubes are so sensitive that a single photon can cause an electron to leave the cathode and induce a large avalanche of secondary and tertiary electrons that reach the anode. One type of photon sensitive tube is a flame detector tube. A flame detector tube is sensitive to the photons produced by flames.
In operation, a tube's anode and cathode are subjected to a constant and necessary bombardment of electrons and ions. The result is the etching and sputtering of the cathode and anode. To provide long tube life, the anode and cathode are often made from or coated with resistant materials such as tungsten and molybdenum. Similarly, the small amount of gas in the tube is chosen to be one that will not damage the anodes and cathodes too much nor react with other tube materials. Neon and a neon/hydrogen mix are often used as tube gasses because they are fairly light and nonreactive.
In the manufacture of vacuum tubes, a run-in period is often required. When first produced, anodes and cathodes are rough. The rough surfaces affect the electric fields and result in inconsistent and occasionally even damaging electron flows and sputtering effects. Run-in is a process in which the tube is run at an elevated voltage to sputter the surfaces smooth. The materials and gases used in vacuum tubes, however, are specifically chosen to minimize sputtering. Engineering decisions for extended tube life also cause long run-in times. Systems and methods for quicker run-in are needed.
The following summary is provided to facilitate an understanding of some of the innovative features unique to the embodiments and is not intended to be a full description. A full appreciation of the various aspects of the embodiments can be gained by taking the entire specification, claims, drawings, and abstract as a whole.
It is therefore an aspect of the embodiments that to obtain an unsealed tube that has at least one anode and at least one cathode. Some tubes are unsealed because they have an open end, others are unsealed because they have open fill tubes that pass through the base of the tube.
It is another aspect of the embodiments to fill the tube with a run-in gas. A run-in gas is a gas that exhibits superior sputtering properties without also reacting with the cathode, anode, or tube material. Noble gases, such as xenon and argon, are good run-in gasses. The tube is run-in while filled with the run-in gas.
It is a further aspect of the embodiments that after running in the tube, it is filled with an end gas. The end gas is the gas that will remain in the tube when it is in operation. As such, the end gas can be neon or neon/hydrogen. The tube is sealed while filled with the end gas.
The accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views and which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, further illustrate aspects of the embodiments and, together with the background, brief summary, and detailed description serve to explain the principles of the embodiments.
The particular values and configurations discussed in these non-limiting examples can be varied and are cited merely to illustrate at least one embodiment and are not intended to limit the scope thereof. In general, the figures are not to scale.
Heavier noble gases such as xenon and argon can reduce the run-in period for vacuum tubes and in particular flame detector tubes. The tubes can be filled with a run-in gas and then run-in. The run-in gas can then be exchanged for an end gas, such as neon, and the tube sealed. A final conditioning step of running in the tube with the end gas can further smooth the tube's anode and cathode to thereby improve performance and operating life.
The operational check 107 and the final conditioning 106 can both be performed after sealing the tube when certain conditions are met. One of those conditions is that the gas mixture and pressure are exactly the same. The final conditioning voltage, however, can differ from the operational voltage. Similarly, run-in 104 and final conditioning 106 can use the same gas mixture but at a different pressure or at a different voltage. For example, the tube can be filled with a low pressure Xenon/Hydrogen mix and run-in at a high voltage. Afterward, additional Xenon and Hydrogen can be added to increase the gas pressure inside the tube. The tube can be sealed and then a lower voltage can then be used for final conditioning. The operational check can then involve checking tube operation at its operation voltage.
The final conditioning step 106 is essentially the same as the method currently used to run-in the tube because current technology uses the end gas for run-in but does not use a run-in gas. The run-in step 104 is approximately five times faster than the final conditioning step 106. For example, under current technology, a run-in process can take six days. In the improved run-in process, filling the tube with run-in gas followed by a day of run-in replaces approximately five days of the current technology process. As such, a tube can be completely run-in including a final conditioning step, in two days instead of six days. Those practiced in the art of vacuum tube manufacture are familiar with filling tubes with gas and running them in.
A first controller 311 controls the flow of run-in gas 312 into a fill tube 307 and from there into the flame detector tube 300. Similarly, a second controller 313 controls the flow of an end gas 314 into the flame resistant tube 300. A vent controller 309 connected to a vent tube 308 can vent the flame detector tube to vacuum 310. The vent tube 308 can be removed from the system if the vent controller 309 is connected to the fill tube 307.
The flame detector tube 300 can be sealed by crushing or pinching off the fill tube 307 and the vent tube 308. The sealing operation can also cut the fill end vent tubes below the seal so the flame detector tube 300 can be removed. Current technology provides for connecting unsealed tubes to the controllers, sealing tubes after run-in, and removing sealed tubes.
It will be appreciated that variations of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
This patent application claims the priority and benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/905,958 filed on Mar. 9, 2007 entitled “Improved Tube Run-In” and which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1851360 | Jacobsen | Mar 1932 | A |
3294468 | Emidy et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
4578043 | Teshima et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
5371435 | Ohishi et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5898377 | Adachi | Apr 1999 | A |
5959301 | Warashina | Sep 1999 | A |
6780378 | Abbasi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784430 | Matocha et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7202794 | Huseynov et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7244946 | Burnette et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7432509 | Mori et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7456412 | Cole et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20020130951 | Kurono | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20060169908 | Mori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070132050 | Sumiya et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080242179 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60905958 | Mar 2007 | US |