These inventions relate to methods, an apparatus for their implementation, of unique player participation games, and for improved methods of play for games of chance. More particularly, these inventions relate to new and improved games involving player participation in a broadcast medium, such as television, and in other communication media, such as over the Internet or other communications network.
Player participation games fall broadly under the categories of games of chance and games of skill. One of the main forms of games of chance is lotteries, which by definition, involve the three elements of: 1) prize, 2) chance and 3) consideration. If these three elements are present, then the game is considered to be a lottery, and is typically then run by a governmental entity. In the United States, lotteries are typically run by the individual states, or collectively by a group of states. In other countries, it is typically the national government that runs the lottery. Countries and states attempt to strictly limit the game play to their geographic boundaries. For example, in Austria, while electronic access to the game may be available over the Internet, or in order to play, the person must have a bank account in Austria, and be able to navigate the non-English menu.
Games have been conducted in any of a number of formats. Certainly, live, in person games have been performed. Yet other games have been played and broadcast over a broadcast medium, such as radio or television. Yet other games have been played through active communication media, such as the telephone, or over a communication network such as the Internet.
Various attempts have been made to provide game play over the Internet. By way of example, the game show Jeopardy has been placed on the web at http://www.sony.com.
Various other attempts have been made to extend the general concept of gambling to broad communication media, such as the Internet. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,268 entitled, “Method of Participating in a Live Casino Game from a Remote Location” has been asserted in a litigation in against an off shore corporation. The '268 patent discloses a system in which a player may participate in a live casino game from a location remote from the casino. A player interface station, such as a computer terminal or other special input device, is connected by a communication line to the casino. A second communication line is established from the casino to the player's financial institution. The player is presented with an image of an actual “live” game. The player then participates directly as if they were physically present at the casino. A wager is cleared with the player's financial institution to insure adequate resources to cover the bet.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,739 to Ronald A. Katz is entitled, “Telephonic—Interface Statistical Analysis System”. The patent describes various operating formats, including a format to be performed in association with television media. Specifically, in one embodiment, a real-time format is provided in which television viewers participate on a real-time basis in a game show for prizes. Expanded audience participation is achieved. Various levels of qualification are provided, such as for a child's television game format is utilized, parental clearance may be required. The use of personal identification numbers (pin numbers) is disclosed. In one implementation, the caller is prompted to identify which of the actual studio of audience participants the caller will be aligned with. Additionally, the caller may be instructed to indicate the extent of a wager. As the game progresses, the individual player's accounts are credited or debited, thereby providing on-going accounting data. In yet another implementation, a non real-time operation is provided. Such a show might involve a quiz for callers based on their ability to perceive and remember occurrences within the show. Pre-registration is optionally utilized. In this implementation, a sequence or time clock would be utilized in order to limit or control individual interfaces to a specific time or geographic “window”. In this way, the caller questions may be utilized across various time zones without the caller having obtained the question earlier than other callers within a given time zone.
Berman, U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,115 discloses a game show and method entitled “Interactive Game Show and Method for Achieving Interactive Communication Therewith”. An interactive communication system is provided which permits individuals to electronically select at least one possible outcome of a plurality of outcomes of a future event. Successful contestants possibly share in a prize which is associated with the event. A home audience of a televised game show may electronically communicate a series of random numbers using their touch tone telephone to participate in the show.
Recently, various governmental entities and trade organizations have addressed the issue of game play over the Internet. Senator Kyl has introduced a bill which would preclude the offering of Internet based gaming, though permitting states to offer Internet gambling. Consideration has been given to requiring that the states sponsored gaming be limited to an Intranet, in an effort to limit those participating, to persons physically resident within the states boundaries. Various international lottery organizations have promoted similar restrictions, namely, precluding the individuals offering of games of chance, and reserving that option exclusively to the state.
Various lottery formats are known to the art. In one classic format, a pre-determined number of tickets are provided with certain printed matter, such as numbers or other indicia, where the information is then obscured by a scratch off layer. By removing the layer and revealing the underlying information, the ticket holder may determine whether they have won or not. Various extensions have been made to a “virtual” scratch off ticket where no physical product is provided.
A conventional lottery proceeds as follows. First, a series of numbers are selected, either by the player or by some automated selection system, such as by computer. Upon the occurrence of a pre-determined event, such as on a set date and time, numbers are randomly chosen. Both mechanical methods, such as selection of ping-pong balls bearing numeric designations, or electronic means such as through a random number generator, may be utilized. The selected numbers are then provided to the participants, such as through a broadcast medium like newspapers, radio and television. Finally, the holder or holders of winning the tickets then present their ticket for payment.
In yet another aspect of game play, a typical television presented game show lasts on the order of one half hour. Various shorter format games or shows have been utilized, for example, a football based advertisement or game has been presented by IBM during televised football games under the name “you make the call”. Yet other shorter version games have been presented over web TV or on the game show network.
The television game show “Who Wants to be a Millionaire” is believed to have originated in Britain, and has become extremely popular in the United States. The game is a trivia game. While being principally a game of skill, the nature of the questions, or the contestants' knowledge of the potential answers, makes the game at times a guessing game or game of chance. The format consists of one contestant and one host. The contestant is presented with a question and four possible answers. If the contestant answers the question correctly, they advance to a next level, each level being associated with a higher monetary prize amount, which is roughly twice the amount of the preceding level. A contestant is given three “life lines”: a “50/50” where in two incorrect answers are removed, thereby leaving the correct answer and one incorrect answer, the “phone a friend”, wherein the contestant may call a friend by telephone and solicit their response to the question, subject to a 30 second time limit, and an “ask the audience” option where the audience is polled regarding their view of the correct answer to the question. Various safe levels are established, such as at $1,000.00 such that the contestant would be awarded that amount of money in the even that they fail to correctly answer a question. Finally, after a question is posed, the contestant may elect to discontinue play, and to receive that amount of money won at the preceding level.
Various proposals have been made to extend the game play experience, particularly in a scratch-off lottery environment. For example, in Kaye, U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,082, entitled “Personal Computer Lottery Game”, methods and systems for playing a player interactive lottery type game are described. A gaming piece, e.g., a printed card, computer memory, disk, contains a “Destiny Code” which is an encrypted symbolic code signifying the outcome of the particular game of chance to be played by the player. Game play proceeds under computer processor control to reveal whether the player has won, and if so, how much, or whether they have lost. The Destiny Code itself contains the win/loss information, and if a win, the amount. The outcome of the game is forced in that the processor controls the outcome of the game of chance. For example, if the Destiny Code indicates that the player is to win $75, the system can match the prize to the game play such that the desired outcome is achieved. If the predetermined outcome is a loss, the game play will include selection of losing numbers. Computer game play may be either local, such as at a stand alone terminal or remote through an on-line service. When played in the on-line environment, the Destiny Code is input by the player, and provides the encrypted information regarding the win (and amount)/loss outcome. In certain instances, the player may select the form of game to be played, e.g., a murder mystery, a horse race type game, or various card games. In the online environment, the system can store a Destiny Code and not allow the code to be played twice. A history file may include various information, such as the number of times the game medium was played, information about how many times the particular player has played, information about different habits of the player, and general information as to what has transpired in the game. A winning game medium is somehow marked to show that the particular Destiny Code has been played. Receipt of prize money may be made at a local machine or at a redemption location.
PCT Application No. WO 00/39761 in the name of Applicant Ingenio, Filiale DeLoto-Quebec, Inc., entitled “Computer Gambling Game”. The game includes a computer program to provide a sequence of game states, which lead to a game outcome. A game seed is required by the computer program to generate one of the sequences of the games. Each game seed corresponds to one of the sequences of the game states. An initiator code is required to begin game play, that code being printed on an instant play lottery ticket or distributed via a computer network. The computer program utilizes a look-up table to retrieve the game seed corresponding to the initiator code. Oberthur Gaming Technologies has an integrated package of three lottery tickets and a compact disc which is sold through authorized lottery retailers. The compact disc contains a program having various games where entry of an access code is necessary to begin game play. The compact disc permits creation of a password, thereby providing limited access to the game. Winning tickets are redeemed at an authorized lottery retailer. The lottery ticket itself contains encoded information as to the win (and amount)/loss status of the ticket in that the retailer can scan the ticket to see if it is a winner.
Despite the wide spread participation in various forms of game play, as well as the suggestions for implementing those games on a mass communication network, such as through the telephone or Internet, the possibility for new games, or improved game play exists. In particular, there is a need for improved games of chance, which provide excitement for the player, and optionally a viewer audience.
This invention relates to methods and associated apparatus for novel game play. In the preferred embodiment, the games are game of chance.
In one of the instant inventions, a game is provided in which the player must communicate electronically with a remote location which contains the information as to whether a player will win or lose the game, and if they win, the prize that they will receive. In one implementation, a lottery game, such as a scratch off lottery game, may include a unique access or Ticket Identification Number (TIN). In order to determine whether the player is a winner, the player must electronically access a remote site. Modes of electronic addressing of the remote site include Internet access, cable access, or access through a conventional communication network such as by a phone. The user is prompted to enter the TIN number, which is used by the system to access memory to determine whether the player has won or lost, and if they have won, the prize for winning. Game play proceeds via the electronic system in a way so as to ultimately inform the player as to whether they have won or lost and if appropriate, as to their prize.
When implemented in conjunction with a lottery type game, the system utilized consists of the lottery system, such as the online terminals located at various vendor locations, and additionally includes communication paths between the electronic game play path, e.g., via the Internet through website game play, and its interaction with the lottery system and its associated database. The lottery processing system may be separate from or integrated with the servers and systems which permit electronic game play. These servers or systems may access information, such as ticket database information, financial data or lottery real-time information.
By way of a more specific example, the lottery game may comprise a conventional scratch-off type game, and include a second or auxiliary game with the base game, such as by providing the two games on a given lottery ticket. The second game includes at least the provision of TIN number information for the player to electronically access the game play system. Optionally, the second game may include a scratch-off aspect on the same ticket which can reveal variable information, such as whether the ticket will entitle the holder to play the second game, e.g., where, for example, two out of five numbers must match, the prize amount the player will play for in the second game, or other variable factors such as the game to be played or the degree of difficulty of the game. The player enters their TIN number over the electronic communication system, wherein turn the number is checked for validity and entitlement for game play. Entitlement for game play may include a determination of whether the TIN number has been previously used. Assuming qualification and entitlement, the TIN number is utilized by the system to look up in memory various aspects about the game play, e.g., what game is to be played, whether the player will win or lose, and the type of prize to be awarded to winners. The system retains a record of TIN numbers which have been played. Redemption of prizes may occur at the authorized retail vendor locations equipped with the lottery infrastructure. The vendor may positively confirm that the TIN number has been played in the electronic game through use of the lottery terminals and infrastructure. Payment of the prize amount may be conditioned on receiving a positive indication that the TIN number has been utilized in the electronic game play.
In yet another aspect of the invention, promotional materials are provided in association with the electronic game play. For example, the lottery system knows the identity of the vendor of a batch of tickets, and may use that information to offer a personalized coupon or promotion. The information regarding coupons or promotions may be provided to the vendors check out and scanning system so as to automatically apply the discount. Optionally, frequent player's clubs may be utilized, such as where points are rewarded for game play. Typically, such a club or system requires player identification, and preferably includes a second form of player identification, such as a code or their own personal PIN number.
In one version, a game comprises the steps of randomly selecting a target number from a first range of numbers having a minimum and a maximum, e.g., from 20 to 50. The number may be selected by the house, or by a player, or by an alternate method of number selection. After presenting the indication of the target number to the player, the player selects numbers from a second range, having a minimum and a maximum, where the maximum is equal to or less than ½ of the minimum of the first range. For example, the second range may be from 1 through 10. The player elects whether or not to draw another number from the second range. The player continues to draw, and the total number of the various graphical depictions being summed, until the player declines to draw further. At that point, the system then draws repeatedly, and randomly, from the second range. The player wins if the system draws numbers which total in excess of the target number. The system wins if the drawn numbers exceed the player's total. Optionally, the system may provide an indication of the odds that the player would go over the target with a subsequent draw. This game is arbitrarily termed JACK-O.
In yet another game, arbitrarily termed POKO, the system receives a buy-in from the player. Multiple indicia are randomly selected from a predefined set, e.g., the numbers from 1 to 10. The system may select a predefined number of numbers, such as 5 numbers. A graphical depiction of the randomly selected indicia are displayed to the player. Optionally, the display may consist of a depiction of a ball, such as the type of ball used in a lottery drawing. Next, a second group of multiple indicia are randomly selected from the predefined set. The number of indicia selected is the same for both the player and the house or system. The first and second sets of numbers are then compared under predefined sets of rules to establish a winner. Payment is then provided to those winning under the rules. By way of example, the system may define a rule for an automatic winner where the player receives five of a kind, e.g., five 7's. Other rules may be utilized, including those from conventional games, such as Poker.
In yet another game format, a second or ancillary game is played in parallel with a first or primary game. By way of example, in association with a first game comprising a lottery number ball draw, a second game may involve a selected player's guessing whether the next ball draw will be of a higher or lower number, or odd or even or the like. For example, during the real time ball draw for a lottery, the improved game play would involve running a parallel or ancillary game along with the ball draw. One implementation would involve a first ball draw, followed then by game play by a contestant such as predicting whether the next ball drawn would be of a higher or lower number, or would be odd or even.
In one implementation, the master of ceremonies would advise the player which of these options had a better probability of being the outcome, thereby making the ancillary game more a game of chance as opposed to a game of skill. Optionally, scoring may be done, such as where one player or audience participant is scored or ranked relative to another player or participant. Optionally, this game may be played through a quick pick format, or through an online or other real time communication network format.
Yet another game format is arbitrarily termed The Zone. In this game, a number is randomly selected from a first range of numbers preferably having a minimum equal to the sum of the lowest numbers to be drawn and a maximum equal to the sum of the highest numbers to be drawn. The game proceeds with sequential drawing of numbers until the player has a total of the draws approaching a predefined zone away from the target number. For example, the target zone may be numbers within 10 of the target. Payment amounts are based upon the player's proximity to the target number, preferably without going over the target number.
Yet another game is one played at a multiple number of levels. At each level, the contestant is presented with multiple options, such as a depiction of four uniquely labeled boxes, amongst which the contestant may choose. The options would include at least one positive outcome and at least one negative outcome. In the case of four boxes, e.g., one could include a strike, two could include a monetary amount, which may be either the same or different and optionally, the fourth box could comprise a mystery box, described below. The contestant selects, at random, one of the options. If the option selected is one of the positive options, such as a monetary amount, they proceed to the next level and the winnings are added to the prior winnings total. If a negative option is selected, such as a strike, in the preferred embodiment, the level is reset and play continues at that level. Preferably, the player is allowed a predetermined number of negative events, such as three strikes, prior to discontinuing play.
The ‘mystery box’ consists of a decision within a decision. A first decision was to select that option, which then was revealed as comprising a mystery box. The player is then given the option of whether to reveal that option. The option within the mystery box would include at least one positive result and at least one negative result. In the preferred embodiment, there would be three results possible with a mystery box, a positive result such as a multiplier for the money, such as a doubler of the contestant' prior winnings, an updating of the safe level for the player or an additional monetary amount. Alternatively, other positive results such as a free play or a reduction in the number of negative events is possible. Preferably, the probability of a negative result from the opening of the mystery box should be equal to the probability of a negative event if the mystery box were not selected.
In yet another aspect, game play utilizes the real time data compiled during a lottery ball draw. Most particularly, the data regarding the number of potential lottery winners is utilized for companion game play. The data may be used directly, such as where the absolute number is guessed or by counting the number of times a given digit appears, or indirectly, such as where the game determines if a digit of the next number will be higher or lower than the last. The data may be used as a secondary random number generator.
The prizes at the various levels may be set as desired to result in a predetermined pay out for the game. Optionally, guaranteed low end prize structures (GLEPS) may require payment of predetermined prize amounts, and possibly payment of a minimum amount of a prize e.g., $500.00. The monetary spacing between various levels may be set as desired, either as an arithmetic progression or as a multiplicative progression, e.g., a substantial doubling of the prize amount at every level. Optionally, when a maximum game level is reached a jackpot or other proportionally large prize may be awarded. If the jackpot is not won in a given game, it may then roll over to a subsequent game. Alternative forms of progressive play may be utilized.
In another aspect of this invention, game play in a first game may require progression through a plurality of levels, leading to game play on a second game for those who have reached the maximum level on the first game. In one implementation, the maximum prize level in the first game may be equal to the minimum prize level in the second game.
Various modes of play are contemplated. In studio game play may be utilized with a broadcast, either live or for taped replay. Yet another mode of game play involves playing at a gaming venue, such as where other games of chance, e.g., slot machines, are played. Yet another venue may consist of game play by the player from their hotel room in a venue which allows gambling. In yet another mode of game play, a network, such as the Internet, may be utilized to permit game play, whether for a monetary amount or to provide other points or indications of score. The game may be played in any venue where not prohibited, whether on land or in an airplane or ship, and may be played in any form of wired or wireless environment, such as via hand-held web enabled communication devices.
The game may be played by a single individual, or may be played with multiple players. The multiple players may play against one another, for scoring, or may merely play in parallel without further interaction.
In yet another aspect, methods and apparatus are provided for participating in on-line or other electronic access games, especially lottery games played over a network, such as the Internet. A player would obtain a lottery product, either scratch-off or on-line directed to playing an electronic game, such as a game on the Internet or played through a telecommunication network, either wired or wireless. By utilizing the conventional sales and distribution channels, the traditional safeguards regarding sales of gaming tickets to under aged players can be maintained. Having obtained the ticket containing a participation number, the player may then enter that number electronically, which would enable play for the amount of money purchased. Winnings may be paid out by presenting the ticket to a retailer, who could verify the winnings via a conventional on-line system. Optionally, the ticket may contain variable information regarding the electronic play, such as the amount to be won, the level of difficulty of a game or what game could be played.
In yet another aspect, the games described herein may be played either as a probability game or as a predetermined outcome game. In the case of a probability game, the outcome is determined based upon the actions of the player. In a predetermined outcome scenario, the system has determined which ticket or tickets are winners, or at what level the win will be paid, and the action of the player has no impact on the outcome of the game play. While the appearance of selection may still appear to be “random” to the player, the system may select the required number or other indicia in order to force the predetermined outcome.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an improved game of chance having a higher level of audience interest and potential participation.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide for an improved Internet game of chance.
It is yet a further object of this invention to provide for enhanced modes of game play in association with existing forms of game play.
Display region 26 shows the possible outcomes from the selection of the mystery box or other denominated decision within a decision. As shown in display 10, the outcomes of the mystery box include a multiplier for the monetary amount previously won by the player, here shown to be a multiplicative doubler of the monetary amount (shown at 26a), or a negative result, such as a strike (shown at 26b) or an updating of the safe level (as shown at 26c).
Returning now to the flowchart, the multiple options 40 are displayed to the contestant. As shown in
As shown in
The negative result box 50 may be of various types. In the preferred embodiment, the negative result 50 may comprise a strike. Preferably, the game is structured as to permit a predetermined number of strikes, such as 3 strikes, prior to the player losing the game. In such a system, the system would update the negative result tally at box 52, and perform a comparison 54 of the totaled number of negative events to the maximum number of negative events allowed. If the comparison 54 indicates that the maximum number has been reached, then program flow proceeds to box 74 where the player is awarded the last existing safe level amount, or if no such safe level amount exists, then whatever minimum prize is indicated according to the rules. That minimum amount may be 0 or some other guaranteed amount. Certain lottery systems require guaranteed low-end prize structure (GLEPS) which guarantee a certain prize or result for certain contestants.
The fourth option shown in
If the safe level update box 70 is selected, the safe level is updated at box 72. In this way, when the player has reached the maximum number of events at box 54, the safe level amount 72 is then provided. After the update of the positive result 48, and optionally, an update of the safe level 72, program flow returns to the level selection 32, at which time the next higher level is selected.
In the preferred embodiment if the number of negative results is less than the maximum number of negative results (box 54), then the decision flows to path A, which returns the player to the decision to select among the available options 42. In the preferred embodiment, when the player has received a strike at a given level, the level is reset and played again. Alternatively, in the event of a negative event, the negative event could be tallied and the player advanced to the next level.
The displays of
In addition to visual displays, voice prompts may be provided, such as where the contestant is prompted to enter information or is otherwise cued to provide a responsive action. Voice input to the system is also feasible.
The images 104 and game play associated therewith may be in addition to the game play of a lottery, such as designated by the numbers 108. Thus, if a player purchases a ticket and receives numbers 108, they may be additionally entitled to play the game depicted by the graphics 104 for possible play on a future lottery game show. In this way, interest in a future lottery game may be created through game play on an existing lottery.
As shown, the ticket 100 optionally includes a bar code 112. As shown, the bar code 112 is disposed on the backside of the lottery ticket. The bar code 112 may be placed wherever desired. In operation, the machine readable bar code may be utilized for tracking or other monitoring purposes.
The games of this invention may be adapted to an on-line selection format, such as where a potential player purchases a lottery or lotto ticket at a retail vending location. The player may be prompted to provide their selection of numbers, such as where they provide one of four numbers for each level. That information may then be passed in an on-line manner to the lottery system. Optionally, game play on the television or other broadcast media may be used for game play by the viewing audience. For example, the game play of successful game play at a given level may be compared to the player's selections previously made through the on-line process. Improved audience viewing levels of a game of chance would result.
The game described herein may be played in any variety of formats. For example, the game may be played in a 30 minute or 1 hour television broadcast type format. Alternatively, the game is adaptable to a short, e.g., 60 second format. Game play may be done in a broadcast mode, such as through in studio participation, either live or taped. Alternate modes may be utilized, such as in a gaming or gambling establishment. Game play may be over a network, such as the Internet or an Intranet. In an Internet game the player may provide credit card information or otherwise have an account with a monetary stake, and that amount may be increased or decreased as the player wins or loses. Alternatively, instead of money, the player may play for points.
Contestant selection may be done by any number of modes or modalities. For example, as described in connection with
After having received the player's buy-in, the system randomly selects multiple indicia from a predefined set. In one embodiment, the predefined set may comprise a set of numbers, such as 1 through 10, and the number of indicia selected may be 5. As shown in
After the various indicia, e.g., a set of first numbers, is selected, they are provided to the player in some graphical depiction. The mode of presentation of the graphics may vary, and the mode of presentation may be selected consistent with the communication bandwidth available. For example, if the game is played over a wireless device, especially one using a text messaging service, such as SMS or equivalent service, the graphical depiction may be merely of the number or other alpha numeric character supported by the display set of the device. For example, when playing POKO, the display may show 77777 indicating the player's numbers, or may optionally also include the display for the house. Characters may be displayed all at once or over some period of time. In a relatively higher bandwidth environment, the graphical depiction may constitute an image of the indicia, such as a number, on a ball, such as a ping-pong ball. The indicia may be displayed to the user on a screen, such as when the game is played over a computer network (wired or wireless), or may be printed on paper or other support media such as when a player purchases a ticket from a business establishment utilizing an on-line ticket dispensing system. Alternatively, the numbers may have been picked beforehand, printed onto a support medium and obscured, such as through the use of a scratch off layer.
The player now having received their numbers or indicia, the game proceeds to the random selection of a second group of multiple indicia from the same predefined set. Thus, in one embodiment, the “house” (also variously referred to as the system or equivalent terminology) would select an equal number of indicia, such as by selecting five numbers. Preferably, the mode of display of the second group of numbers is similar to the first. Thus, as shown in
Finally based upon the outcome of the winner determination, payment is provided, as appropriate. In one implementation, any POKO winner would share the overall jackpot. Other winning hands may be paid out with a fixed amount. For example, those having five of a kind may receive $100, those having four of a kind receiving a smaller amount, e.g., $50, and so on.
While the foregoing description utilizes the winning hand determination of poker as the defined set of rules, other existing game rules may be utilized as desired. By utilizing a truly random mechanism for selecting the indicia, the game becomes one of chance, as opposed to having a component based upon skill. Further, by utilizing a graphical depiction drawn from the conventional images associated with a random draw in a lottery, the game achieves more of a look and feel of a lottery, as opposed to a game of skill.
While described, above, for one player, the game may be expanded to an arbitrarily large number of players. When the game is played in a real time environment, such as over the television or other communication network (wired or wireless) the game may be played at predetermined times. For example, the game may be played every 15 minutes on the hour, once a day, etc. Optionally, a portion of the collective monies being wagered may go into the pot. In this way, there is the possibility of a carry-over amount, and the possibility of a “lottery fever”. In yet another aspect, the game permits multiple purchases of entries. For example, a player buying tickets at a retail establishment may purchase a first ticket and only receive a “pair” of matching numbers. The player may continue to purchase additional tickets until receiving one that the player believes may be sufficiently valuable to have a acceptable chance of success. Such an arrangement may be performed either through a standard quick pick arrangement or via a scratch off. In contrast to a conventional lottery number selection scheme, the player must be precluded from selecting their own numbers in this game.
In yet another aspect, a push/pull system may be utilized. In such a system, the main system initiates the contact with the prospective players, such as by sending an SMS message or email. The player may then elect to participate, or not. In the event that the system provides information to the prospective player about their possible numbers, then the system may require a variable level of payment, such as where the system charges a first amount if the player elects to pass, in a second, higher amount, if the player elects to participate in the game.
Next, a number is randomly selected for the player, where the number is selected from a second range, the range having a minimum and a maximum number. The maximum of the second range is equal to or less than ½ of the minimum of the first range. By way of example, if the second range is from 1 to 10, the first range is at least 20. Game play continues by receiving an indication from the player as to whether to draw again. If the player elects to do so, a next randomly selected number from the second range is presented to the user. The cumulative amount of the draws is titled. This step is repeated either until the player declines to draw further or the title exceeds the target number. In the event that the player declines to draw, the system randomly selects numbers from the second range, accumulating those numbers and comparing the total to the player's accumulated total amount. The winner is the one who has the highest total closest to or equal to, but not exceeding, the target number.
In yet another aspect of this invention, the player may be advised upon the option for a draw that there is a possibility going over the target number. Further, the system may optionally provide an indication of the odds of exceeding the target number.
In one implementation, this game would be played in an interactive mode. Computer or other communication access would permit effective game play. Multiple players may play in parallel against the house, with the display for the other players being included upon all player's screens. While the main implementation contemplated includes a graphical display, yet other forms of conveying information to a player may be utilized, e.g., by providing the information audibly to the player, such as via the telephone or other speaker arrangement on a communications device.
Various aspects of enhanced game play and novel game are disclosed. In a first aspect, the game play method and system provides for the playing or running of a parallel game or ancillary game along with a first or primary game. For example, during the real time ball draw for a lottery, the improved game play would involve running a parallel or ancillary game along with the ball draw. One implementation would involve a first ball draw, followed then by game play by a contestant such as predicting whether the next ball drawn would be of a higher or lower number, or would be odd or even.
In one implementation, the master of ceremonies would advise the player which of these options had a better probability of being the outcome, thereby making the ancillary game more a game of chance as opposed to a game of skill. Optionally, scoring may be done, such as where one player or audience participant is scored or ranked relative to another player or participant.
In one implementation, the monetary award to the player may be based upon the number drawn in the base lottery. For example, if the first ball drawn in the lottery is 17, the potential prize award amount could be some multiple thereof, such as $17,000.00. If the next number drawn in the base lottery is 35, and the player as guessed “higher”, then the 35× the multiplier, e.g., $35,000.00, may be added to the prior total, raising the potential winnings to $52,000.00.
The game may be played in real time, that is, simultaneously with the base game, where the input mode permits essentially real time input. For example, input via a computer system or other communication system (wired or wireless) may be utilized. Alternatively, the selection of high/low may be made prior to the selection of the base numbers. The selection of the high/low may be made affirmatively by the player or may be done by a quick pick method. As shown in
In addition to monetary awards, the result of the game play may result in other opportunities or prizes. For example, the winner of the corollary or ancillary game may be placed in a pool for a drawing to be on a subsequent television or other broadcast show, such as a subsequent baseball draw. Systems and software currently exist, such as those supplied by Gtech, which permit the real time monitoring of the number of players holding tickets or participation interests which are still potential winners. In connection with the high/low game, the system may also monitor in real time the number of players of the high/low game who remain as potential winners.
The random selection of a series of numbers for the base lottery then proceeds. The numbers for the base lottery are then tallied. Prizes are assigned or awarded to players based upon a schedule. For example, if the player's number equals the lottery total, the maximum prize would be awarded, e.g., $100,000.00. If the player's number is 1 away from, preferably 1 less than, the lottery total, a lesser prize is awarded, e.g., $5,000.00. The prize amounts continue to decrease as the difference between the player's number and the lottery total increase. Optionally, no further prizes are awarded once the difference between the player's number and the lottery total exceeds a certain number, e.g., 10 away. In the preferred mode of play, prizes are awarded only to those who have a player's number not exceeding the lottery total.
Current lottery systems are often implemented in an “on-line” environment. That is, the sale of a lottery ticket, and the numbers corresponding to that ticket are, received by and stored in the overall system prior to the actual drawing of the lottery numbers. Thus, prior to the drawing of the lottery numbers, the system may determine how many tickets have certain combinations of numbers. That information may then be utilized for ancillary game play or for another purpose, such as for a secondary, random number generator. The following table provides exemplary numbers. For example, if the #1 ball is 28, there may be 22,316,429 people remaining. After the second ball draw of 15, there may be 6,562,156 remaining. The table then continues on through the sixth ball draw whereupon only two people remain.
The absolute number of players remaining may be utilized directly. For example, either the absolute number may be utilized, for example, is the number higher or lower than a predetermined number, or some portion of the number may be used. For example, the last digit may be compared to the prior last digit as to whether it is higher or lower. For at least the first number of ball draws, the last digit should be substantially random. In this way, a secondary random number generator is provided. The data regarding the number of players remaining may be used indirectly. For example, the contestants may indicate the number of occurrences of a given digit, such as the number of occurrences of a given digit, such as the number of 9's in a given number. Thus, those who had wagered that there would be one 9 in the number of players with the given number would be winners as to ball draw #1. In this way, game play is based upon the number of remaining players as determined in substantially real time. In yet another mode of game play, players may be awarded a certain amount of money for every predetermined digit. For example, a player may select a 4 and then for every 4 being revealed during the game, the contestant wins a predetermined amount, e.g., $25,000.00 for each occurrence. Thus, utilizing the data in the table above, the contestant would win $25,000.00 after the first ball draw because of the occurrence of one 4, but would not win further in this aspect as no further 4's arose. Viewer interest in the underlying lottery draw may be maintained as the players continue to potentially win through to the end. Thus, even if the viewer has “lost” on the underlying lottery, they may still be incentivized to watch where each new ball draw generates an event which may lead to a further win. In yet another implementation, the numerical data relating to the number of players remaining may be categorized for the number of draws which ended up with numbers that were odd or even.
In yet another aspect, the game play includes the use of contestant game play to determine lottery numbers. For example, a contestant may be blind folded or otherwise be made unable to see various options. The person then selects from among the various options as the means by which the random lottery numbers are drawn. One example could comprise a blind folded contestant selecting objects.
In yet another aspect, this invention relates to an interstitial game show. Main or regular programming, such as is broadcasted on a given evening during prime time on a broadcast network would additionally include multiple interspersed, typically short, segments relating to game play. In the preferred embodiment, the game play would be for a relatively short period of time, for example, 1 to 2 minutes. For example, at 8:00 an initial round may be played prior to the beginning of prime time programming. Normal programming would then resume through the remainder of the 8:00 hour. At 9:00, a second short segment may be played. The play may continue at later times, such as to culminate at a show at 11:00. Preferably, the short segments would not necessarily be shown at a predetermined or predeterminable time as far as the audience was concerned. In that way, viewers who wish to see the progression of the game segments would need to continue viewing that channel, or at least, return to the channel fairly frequently. Optionally, the game play may be progressive from one interstitial game segment to another. Players may be presented with the option of stopping play or continuing.
In yet another game format, the show would include a display having an underlying image, with that image being at least partially obscured by overlying image regions which differ from the underlying image region. A contestant would be given a time limit in which they would be presented with information relating to a suggestion or a clue relating to an overlying image region, which if the player responded correctly, would be removed so as to reveal that portion of the underlying image which was below the overlying image. The suggestion or clues may be related to the underlying image or may merely be unrelated suggestions or clues with respect to that particular overlying image region.
Yet another embodiment of game play provides for the repurposing of an existing taped game show. The previously recorded game show would be segmented into subsets of issues, for example, presentation of questions or answers (as in the case of Jeopardy), those issues would be presented to one or more players, a response would be received from those players, and the answer would be compared to the correct answer. Scoring would then rank players relative to one another or to indicate the amount of the prize. In yet another game play implementation, one or more contestants would be presented with multiple images upon which predetermined data had been assembled. For example, images of five actresses may be presented to the player and the associated data would comprise opinion polling information as to whom the audience thought was the most attractive. The players would then play against each other to eliminate the images which they believe do not correspond to the most popular or number one response. The players would alternate until one player remained. In a second round, individual play, as opposed to play between contestants is utilized. Again, the player attempts to eliminate those answers which were other than the most popular answer of the audience.
In yet another aspect of enhanced game play, audience participation via an interactive video display, such as a computer connected over the Internet, or via an interactive television arrangement, may participate in the program.
The advent of electronic access to games has raised the serious issue of under-aged player participation. Controlling access by under-age players accessing a game over the Internet or other communication device, e.g., pager, cell phone, wireless application protocol device, SMS device, etc., has proved to be difficult. The inventive method and apparatus may be understood in connection with
In one aspect of this invention, the entertainment value of the retail purchase may be increased. For example, the tickets may contain variable information, either obscured or not obscured, regarding the electronic play. In one aspect, the amount of prize that the player can win could be presented. In the case of on-line ticket distribution, this amount would not need to be obscured, but would be obscured such as by a scratch-off strip in the case of a preprinted ticket. Yet another variable which could be utilized relates to the level of difficulty of game play. Yet another variable could be an indication of which of a plurality of games could be played by the player, e.g., POKO, LOTTO, The Zone, etc.
The system also preferably includes a connection to a physical vending location for providing tickets. Preferably, the system includes an electronic communication between the system, e.g., the processor, and an on-line retail vendor. Preferably, the vendor possesses a ticket printing system which can print the tickets based upon input from the processor. The processor in turn potentially communicates with a number of databases. A ticket database would contain at least information regarding the tickets sold and the associated information (e.g., the numbers selected for a lottery game, the amount of value associated with a ticket purchased, the amount associated with a prize, information regarding a game to be played or the level of difficulty of the game). In order to permit real time game play, the system would have an input path permitting entry of data from a live event, such as a televised ball draw. Optionally, the system also couples to a substantially real-time lottery information system, such as the fast-track system whereby ancillary games based upon the fast-track data may be played.
In yet another aspect of this invention, the previously described games may be played either as probability games (where the outcome of the game is determined based upon the actions of the player) or as a predetermined game (where the “winning” status of a particular game play is determined prior to the player's participation or other game play). As described previously, the game JACK-O was a probability game in that the user's election of whether or not to draw was a factor in determining the outcome of the game. JACK-O could be implemented as a predetermined win game. The system would determine whether, and in what amount, the player would win. The system could then force that outcome, such as by presenting a certain number to the player based upon the ball draw. Thus, while game play may appear “random” to the player, the system would act in a manner so as to cause the predetermined outcome. Optionally, game play may include steps which aid in achieving the desired outcome, such as by requiring the player to draw when their tally is within a predefined number (e.g., less than 5 away) from a target number.
The player may engage in the electronic game play through any number of modes of entry. Computers 240 may access the system via the Internet 242 or other communications network. An interactive TV system 246 may interface with the system 210 via a cable network 248. A wireless display enabled device 250 may communicate with the system 210 through a communication network 252. Any form of electronic communication enabled device may be utilized, whether wired or wireless, such as a cell phone, personal digital assistant, pager, messaging system, wireless application protocol (WAP) system, or other form of communication tool. Preferably, the system includes a graphical display capability, most preferably including the ability to display both static and dynamic images, preferably at variable degrees of resolution, ranging from low resolution to normal resolution to high resolution.
A ticket identification number (TIN) would be provided on the ticket possessed by the player. While the term ticket is utilized here, it will be appreciated that any form of communication of the identification number may be made, such as where the identification number is otherwise printed on a piece of paper, supplied through an electronic display or otherwise. Additionally, while one implementation includes a lottery game as the base game, the electronic remote game play of the instant inventions may be utilized with the lottery game, or completely independent of a lottery game. For example, a business wishing to run a promotional game may provide players with identification numbers for their use in the game sponsored by the business. Thus, while the term ticket identification number will be utilized herein, it will be appreciated that the identification number is the information to be utilized, and that the reference to the ticket merely references the medium on which the particular identification number has been conveyed. As shown, the identification numbers are provided sequentially, while they need not be. The identification number may include encrypted information or may be subject to an accuracy check, such a mod 10 check or redundancy check.
The ticket identification number is then associated with one or more other data elements regarding the game play or the player. For example, in the event that variable game play as to the particular game to be played forms a part of the system, the memory would include an identification as to that game. As shown, the TIN 65432981 indicates that the HOT SEAT game will be played, whereas the game JACKO will be played for someone entering the TIN 65432982. The system also contains information regarding the prize, both in form whether monetary or non-monetary and the amount. In the case of a predefined win situation, such as in a scratch-off, the identity of the winning identification numbers is known prior to the player receiving the ticket. After the game is played, the player may optionally be provided with an authentication number which confirms their game play. Optionally, the system may request that the player confirm receipt of the acknowledgment number. Time limits may optionally be imposed upon how long the identification number remain available for play. As shown, certain of the identification numbers are subject to a last date to play limitation, whereas others are not so limited and are open. In yet another optional aspect, game play through to a certain point may be required in order to reveal the prize information.
As shown in
After the game play is concluded, the player may be offered a survey to fill out. Such surveys may be used to solicit personal information which may be updated in the player's individual records. Statistical processing of survey data or other game play data may be compiled by the system. In yet another variation, game play may be enabled between multiple players. Buddy lists or other association groupings may be utilized to form competitive game play pairings.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims.
This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/385,560, filed Apr. 16, 2019, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,438,453 on Oct. 8, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/178,368, filed Nov. 1, 2018, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,269,221 on Apr. 23, 2019; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/910,424, filed Mar. 2, 2018, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,121,326 on Nov. 6, 2018; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/487,376, filed Apr. 13, 2017, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,911,285 on Mar. 6, 2018; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/794,045, filed Mar. 11, 2013, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,626,837 on Apr. 18, 2017; which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/123,861, filed Apr. 15, 2002, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,393,946 on Mar. 12, 2013; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/965,620, filed Sep. 26, 2001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,811,484 on Nov. 2, 2004. This application is also related to application Ser. No. 09/672,179, filed Sep. 27, 2000, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,488,280 on Dec. 3, 2002, and application Ser. No. 09/585,987, filed Jun. 2, 2000, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,084 on May 20, 2003, which are all hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3825255 | Kennard et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3873092 | Fagan | Mar 1975 | A |
4348027 | Escamilla-Kelly | Sep 1982 | A |
4582324 | Koza et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4772025 | James et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4836546 | DiRe et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4856787 | Itkis | Aug 1989 | A |
4883278 | Scott | Nov 1989 | A |
4943090 | Fienberg | Jul 1990 | A |
5035422 | Berman | Jul 1991 | A |
5046737 | Fienberg | Sep 1991 | A |
5074566 | Desbiens | Dec 1991 | A |
5112050 | Koza et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116049 | Sludikoff et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119295 | Kapur | Jun 1992 | A |
5157602 | Fields et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158293 | Mullins | Oct 1992 | A |
5256863 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5269521 | Rossides | Dec 1993 | A |
5271626 | Llenas et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5317135 | Finnocchio | May 1994 | A |
5327485 | Leaden | Jul 1994 | A |
5407199 | Gumina | Apr 1995 | A |
5409225 | Kelly et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409234 | Bechter | Apr 1995 | A |
5417424 | Snowden et al. | May 1995 | A |
5472196 | Rusnak | Dec 1995 | A |
5475205 | Behm et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5499816 | Levy | Mar 1996 | A |
5513852 | Robinson | May 1996 | A |
5518253 | Pocock et al. | May 1996 | A |
5569082 | Kaye | Oct 1996 | A |
5569512 | Brawner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5620182 | Rossides | Apr 1997 | A |
5628684 | Bouedec | May 1997 | A |
5643088 | Vaughn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651735 | Baba | Jul 1997 | A |
5655961 | Acres et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5685541 | Lovell, Sr. | Nov 1997 | A |
D387390 | Seiler | Dec 1997 | S |
5697844 | Von Kohorn | Dec 1997 | A |
5709603 | Kaye | Jan 1998 | A |
5721583 | Harada et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5772510 | Roberts | Jun 1998 | A |
5772511 | Smeltzer | Jun 1998 | A |
5779549 | Walker et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785315 | Eiteneer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791990 | Schroeder et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795228 | Trumbull et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5813913 | Berner et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816575 | Keller | Oct 1998 | A |
5816918 | Kelly et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5842921 | Mindes et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855514 | Kamille | Jan 1999 | A |
5857175 | Day et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871398 | Schneier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5909875 | Weingardt | Jun 1999 | A |
5916024 | Von Kohorn | Jun 1999 | A |
5931467 | Kamille | Aug 1999 | A |
5934671 | Harrison | Aug 1999 | A |
5935001 | Baba | Aug 1999 | A |
5936661 | Trew | Aug 1999 | A |
5937380 | Segan | Aug 1999 | A |
5949042 | Dietz, II et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971855 | Ng et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6012983 | Walker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015344 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
D420057 | Colombo | Feb 2000 | S |
6024640 | Walker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024641 | Sarno | Feb 2000 | A |
6048268 | Humble | Apr 2000 | A |
6070872 | Squitieri | Jun 2000 | A |
6077163 | Walker et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080062 | Olson | Jun 2000 | A |
6082887 | Feuer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086477 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102395 | Such | Aug 2000 | A |
6102400 | Scott et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6168521 | Luciano et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193610 | Junkin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203011 | Nulph | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234896 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238288 | Walker et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240555 | Shoff et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241246 | Guttin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241606 | Riendeau et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6244957 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250685 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251017 | Leason et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D444507 | Lundberg | Jul 2001 | S |
6267376 | Jenkins | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267670 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273817 | Sultan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273820 | Haste, III | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277026 | Archer | Aug 2001 | B1 |
RE37371 | Gerow | Sep 2001 | E |
6290600 | Glasson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293865 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306035 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309298 | Gerow | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312334 | Yoseloff | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319127 | Walker et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322446 | Yacenda | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6354593 | Frommer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373462 | Pan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382627 | Lundberg | May 2002 | B1 |
6416414 | Stadelmann | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424703 | Katz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435500 | Gumina | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443452 | Brune | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443840 | Von Kohorn | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6446964 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454648 | Kelly et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475085 | Moody | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488280 | Katz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491215 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497408 | Walker et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6514144 | Riendeau et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6547242 | Sugiyama et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565084 | Katz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569017 | Enzminger et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602135 | Gerrard | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607439 | Schneier et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6634942 | Walker et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6656042 | Reiss et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6656048 | Olsen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663105 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676522 | Rowe et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6749198 | Katz et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749500 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758755 | Kelly et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778711 | Morita | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811484 | Katz et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824469 | Allibhoy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6888929 | Saylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6908382 | Walker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6939229 | McClintic | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6941135 | Minear et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6969317 | Walker et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6988732 | Vancura | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994625 | Falciglia, Sr. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008317 | Cote et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018292 | Tracy et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7052010 | Katz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054928 | Segan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7140964 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156739 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163459 | Tanskanen | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181690 | Leahy et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7186180 | Lathrop et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192352 | Walker et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194542 | Segan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7204756 | Jubinville et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7285048 | Karmarker | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7309280 | Toyoda | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322885 | Luciano, Jr. et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7331860 | Herrman et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7357715 | Kane | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374484 | Bennett, III | May 2008 | B2 |
7398225 | Voltmer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404764 | Bozeman | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7422213 | Katz et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7470186 | Cannon | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510116 | Robb et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7533885 | Nicely et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546411 | Bruner et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559838 | Walker et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7611065 | Behm et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621810 | Gilmore et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631871 | Bozeman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634864 | Segan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645194 | Van Luchene et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654529 | Rogers | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7662038 | Bozeman | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666082 | Kane et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666084 | Hermann et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666095 | Van Luchene | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686691 | Van Luchene | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7690996 | Iddings et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7716126 | France et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7726652 | Jubinville et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734251 | Harvey et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7749066 | Hartman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7749081 | Acres | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7753772 | Walker et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7753774 | Gail et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753789 | Walker et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756742 | Gilmore et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766739 | Kane et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766740 | Penrice | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771264 | Kane et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785193 | Paulsen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785195 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794324 | White et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7797717 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7798896 | Katz et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7811172 | Asher et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815502 | Hardy et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819747 | Kane et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860131 | Harvey et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7871327 | Walker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874914 | Walker et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896735 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7899915 | Reisman | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908638 | Harvey et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7914374 | Walker et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918736 | Walker et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934986 | Kane et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7945856 | Leahy et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955169 | Walker et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959502 | Kane et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967292 | Katz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976374 | Kane et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7980942 | Kane et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988551 | Walker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002630 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012013 | Walker et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016668 | Hardy et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025567 | Kane et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029361 | Hardy et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038529 | Kane et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046256 | Chien et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047907 | Kane et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075386 | Leake | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8075387 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8082501 | Leahy et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083583 | Bennett, III et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8109828 | Kane et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8118660 | Pace | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133113 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137178 | Lind et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8147325 | Kane et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8157630 | Herrmann et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8206210 | Walker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8241100 | Katz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8241110 | Katz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8287351 | Boykin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290816 | Whiteman et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8308162 | Rogers | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8342959 | Mahaffey et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357040 | Ansari et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376826 | Katz et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8393946 | Katz et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8425297 | Kane et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425300 | Kane et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460081 | Meyer | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8529336 | Katz et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535134 | Katz et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8626582 | Ariff et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8663003 | Blackburn et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8696431 | Safaei et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696432 | Kane et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8708814 | Kane et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8727853 | Katz et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727858 | Davis et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727867 | Kane et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8764543 | Houle et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8794630 | Katz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8795071 | Katz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8935714 | Frazier et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9280875 | Pincus et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9478095 | Walker et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9508225 | Katz et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9626837 | Katz et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9773373 | Katz et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9911278 | Katz et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9911285 | Katz et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9940792 | Katz et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9947178 | Katz et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10032329 | Katz et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10074240 | Katz et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10121326 | Katz et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10173128 | Katz et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10176674 | Katz et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10217322 | Katz et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269221 | Katz et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10275994 | Katz et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10438453 | Katz et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10445980 | Katz et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
20020037766 | Muniz | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020069265 | Bountour et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094869 | Harkham | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020119824 | Allen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165020 | Koyama | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165025 | Kawahara | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187825 | Tracy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023547 | France et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045340 | Roberts | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030189288 | Katz et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195043 | Shinners et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023711 | Knapp | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040204222 | Roberts | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040259626 | Akram et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096117 | Katz et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050164779 | Okuniewicz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050250569 | Kane et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060025197 | Kane et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060105837 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060217188 | Walker et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248025 | Walker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251383 | Vronay et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070259710 | Walker et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080009335 | Walker et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009340 | Walker et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080146337 | Halonen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080215623 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248865 | Tedesco et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090011812 | Katz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061980 | Holton et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090117966 | Rogers et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090228351 | Rijsenbrij et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234745 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234861 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240568 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240586 | Ramer et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247259 | Napolitano | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110059786 | Walker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110218025 | Katz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20170076534 | Katz et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170221298 | Katz | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180322726 | Katz et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190180564 | Katz et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200242881 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10123861 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 13794045 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16385560 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 16587530 | US | |
Parent | 16178368 | Nov 2018 | US |
Child | 16385560 | US | |
Parent | 15910424 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16178368 | US | |
Parent | 15487376 | Apr 2017 | US |
Child | 15910424 | US | |
Parent | 13794045 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15487376 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09965620 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10123861 | US |