1. Prior Art
The following is a tabulation of some prior art that presently appears relevant:
2. Field of the Invention
The current invention relates to non-lethal defense system and means for ships to immobilize small watercraft.
Modern day pirates use small watercraft to attack merchant ships by boarding and hijacking the crew and the ship. These activities pose serious threats to the safety of the crew. Merchant ships responded by hiring onboard security guards and operating with high uneconomical speed. It also drew large fleets of naval ships to patrol some areas. Even though they seem effective, these deterrents are expensive, and the way these ships operate are producing unwarranted pollution. Due to regional anarchy situation, the threat around some costs of Africa could remain for the foreseeable future. And furthermore, similar kinds of piracy had also increased in other areas of the world such as southeast Asia.
To counter this threat, there had been a few propeller entanglement or disabling systems proposed. U.S. Pat. No. 8,776,710 to Gayton (2014), a passive towed array of entanglement lines. This system might stop the first uninformed attacker. Once the pirates learned what this is, they could attack by destroying the supporting structure such as cutting the suspension cables. After all, its rigging is openly visible. Even just a few whacks with a knife at the entanglement lines can send them tumbling down dangerously toward the ship's own propeller.
U.S. Pt. No. 8,256,336 to Larkin et al. (2012), an entanglement device between two hulls as unmanned underwater vehicles. In one embodiment, the two hulls will be separately guided. The entanglement linkage between the hulls will create an interference very difficult for the guiding process to handle. Another difficulty for this guiding scheme is that, when the two hulls come close to the target, they need to each aim at the acoustic signal with a changing side angle. In another embodiment, the two hulls are connected to a third hull with a variable link. This could make the whole setup cumbersome and not agile enough to chase a moving boat. On top of these issues, for all the embodiments presented, the entanglement net is directly coupled to the hulls and both hulls are at the same depth as the entanglement net. This will have a high chance of hitting the watercraft with the hull itself. In case of a head on or sideway interception, such collision would be catastrophic, which is undesirable.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,552,282 to Garcia et al. (2013), an unmanned underwater vehicle in the form of a torpedo with a protruding rod or rods. This approach added excessive difficulty by chasing a not too big moving propeller with a very small rod. It is like trying to poke a fly in the air with a toothpick. We all know it is easier to hit a fly with a swatter, especially if we know where the fly is going. The last two patents discussed both added unnecessary difficulties to the task such that, even if they can be realized, their systems could still be too complicated for nonmilitary merchant crew to operate.
There are other passive barrier type of security setups such as razer wires or bulwark. These could either be circumvented or destroyed by force because the setups are visible to the attackers, showing where they are vulnerable. One can only hope to be a less desirable target with these measures.
What seems still lacking is an effective defense system that is easy enough to be operated by a trained merchant crew. It will be beneficial if we can provide a non-lethal and cost effective way to protect against pirate boats so that a ship can travel safely anywhere in the world.
The present invention provides an easy-to-operate and non-lethal way to immobilize small watercraft. It can be used to protect merchant ships from pirates trying to board using small boats. It can also be used for apprehension operation by law enforcement or for antiterrorism by the military. In accordance with the illustrative embodiments of the invention, a system for immobilizing small watercraft comprises an underwater vehicle equiped with a structure to deliver a crippling effect to the propulsion mechanism of the watercraft. The vehicle is either self propelled or towed with a winch system. The structure for delivering crippling effect is either an entanglement device or a bumper for ramming the propeller. The vehicle is maintain onboard the ship and deployed in the water as soon as the threat is detected.
In case of a pirate boarding attack, the vehicle is launced and set waiting close to the ship behind where the pirate boat is heading. As the boat is about to be running next to the ship, the vehicle is brought forward alongside the ship, engage the boat and immobilize it.
In cases for counter terrorism or law enforcement, the launched vehicle is guided to intercept and immobilize the target watercraft at a distance from the ship. The guiding can be done using a homing guidance onboard the vehicle or an inertial guidance, with tracking information provided by the ship.
One critical perception the current invention discloses is as follows. As the pirates try to board the ship, they will bring their boat side by side next to the ship. For this window of time, they turn themselves into an easy target. Based on this understanding, many approaches become feasible for immobilizing such a sitting duck pirate boat. The underwater vehicle for this situation only needs to move along a preset course next to the ship. Therefore, it can either be a towed body, somewhat like a paravane, or it can be a self propelled unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV), without a need for homing capability.
In a towed body configuration, the cable serves as a means for both driving and guiding. The vehicle may even further use the side of the ship as a guide so active steering is not required. However, remotely controlled steering may allow for some off-course chasing capability. The depth control mechanism can be preset as well for proper delivery of the crippling effect. To cover the length of the ship, the winch system is pulling the vehicle from close to the bow and uses a guiding arm adjustable for different draft conditions. When not in use, this guiding arm can be retracted or folded up to reduce drag. To be stealth, this arm is completely underwater. Advantage of this approach is a low cost, low maintenance vehicle.
In an UUV configuration, the vehicle has onboard propulsion and steering. This means minimal or even no modification to the hull of the operating ship—a factor likely more appealing for ships already in service. The UUV can be controlled remotely by manual adjustment in steering and propulsion. The depth control mechanism can be preset but might just as well be made adjustable. Even though in this configuration, a tether cable between the vehicle and the ship is not required, such a cable could provide many additional benefits. It allows the vehicle to conserve power while waiting for the attacker to approach. It can be used to help with retrieval of the vehicle after the mission. It can also serve as a restraint to ensure that the vehicle will not hit and damage the ship's own propeller. For better serviceability, the signal wire for remote control may be combined and built into this tether cable.
In some other cases, such as for smaller ships, ships with low freeboard, or defense against terrorist attack, it may not be a good idea to allow the malicious watercraft to come too close to the ship. While, in a law enforcement apprehension operation, the watercraft is likely fleeting. The embodiments in the UUV configuration can further include a guiding or even homing mechanism on board whereby the UUV can intercept the watercraft and immobilize it at a good distance form the ship.
A few additional features can be shared with both the towed vehicle and the UUV configurations. In some embodiments, a camera system is used to provide surveillance so the operating crew can stay in the safe citadel. The camera can be mounted at high spots on the ship such as by the bridge or on an unmanned aerial vehicle drone. To make the vehicle or UUV easier to be identified by the surveillance system, one or more light sources are mounted on some of the embodiments. These light souces only emit light invisible to the human eye so as to keep the adversaries uninformed. In some other embodiments, a motion control subsystem can be used to coordinate the steering and other functions. This control system can incorporate data such as water flow parameters around the ship. Position of the vehicle relative to the ship can, for example, be extracted from processing the surveillance image or using a sonar. It is within the capability for those skilled in the art to implement such a subsystem. By doing so, the system does not requires skilled steering, and the operation can be as easy as entering a position referenced to the ship and hitting a go button.
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
As described earlier, vehicle 100 is deployed before watercraft 210 is anywhere near ship 200. Referring to
Referring now to
Another embodiment for a winch system is illustrated in
Referring now to
The operation for UUV 600 to immobilize pirate watercraft is similar to towed vehicle 100, except that UUV 600 is self propelled and remote controlled through RF or other types of wireless signals. The advantage of this embodiment is no hull modification for ship 200, while a concern is the limited power and hence the endurance of the vehicle. Especially if a pirate watercraft takes a long time approaching. A temporary leash from above the deck of ship 200 can be used after launch, which is to be released when the pirate watercraft comes near.
Referring now to
As mentioned earlier, for small ships, antiterrorist or law enforcement, it is desirable to immobilize a watercraft much farther away from the operating ship. Embodiments such as UUVs 500, 600 and 700 can be used for such applications. Due to the reason that the entanglement devices and wide bumper areas allow a large margin of aiming error, a non-homing type of guidance system can be used on the UUVs. Means onboard the operating ship, such as sonar or visual surveillance, can be used to extract the position and velocity of both the UUVs and the watercrafts. Programs onboard the operating ship can then guide the UUVs with motion commands for interception. Of course, the UUVs can further include an onboard homing guidance mechanism, which is well known in the art.
As pointed out through detailed descriptions and illustrations, the advantages of the current invention are numerous. The presented methods greatly increase the prospect of success while being very simple to operate. The system takes advantage of stealth so the adversaries will not be able to counteract easily. It will achieve a speedy termination of the threat, while not putting the targeted personnel in danger. It does not add burden to the ship when no threat is present, and consumes only minimal energy during operation.
The current invention was illustrated with many embodiments in various forms and shapes. Simply mixing some of the featured components from different embodiments presented can easily provide more new ones. Therefore, it is clear to be understood that what the disclosure teaches are just examples, not to be taken as limitations. And, the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
The present application claim priority from provisional patent application No. 61/941,314, filed on Feb. 18, 2014
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61941314 | Feb 2014 | US |