The invention relates generally to a system for implanting a device such as a surgical mesh at an anatomical site in the body of a patient. More particularly, the invention relates to a surgical mesh enclosed within an envelope and a system for delivering the envelope and mesh to an anatomical site in the patient's body.
The use of a surgical mesh for the repair and restoration of living tissue is well known. For example, surgical mesh may be used to support and/or reinforce a damaged or weakened portion in the body of a patient. In this regard, the surgical mesh must additionally be sufficiently porous to allow for growth of tissue through the mesh after implantation. The healing tissue grows through porous openings in, for example, an implanted synthetic mesh, thereby assimilating the tissue with the mesh and adding structural integrity to the tissue.
Surgical meshes may be produced with yarns including monofilament and multifilament yarns. Multifilament yarns have small void areas or interstitial spaces between the yarn filaments. The yarns in the surgical mesh may be made of materials such as polypropylene, polyesters, and co-polymers thereof. Such polymeric materials typically do not have surface structures that are absorbent or adsorbent; thus, meshes made out of such materials are unable to absorb drugs.
The crevices and voids of the surgical mesh may harbor bacteria or other pathogens that contaminate the surgical mesh during implantation. Following implantation of the surgical mesh in the patient, the bacteria or other pathogens harbored in the mesh are introduced to the anatomical site where the surgical mesh is implanted. Typically, the anatomical site being repaired is poorly accessible to antimicrobial drugs applied intraoperatively to combat bacteria or other pathogens that may be picked up and introduced to the anatomical site during the surgery to implant the mesh.
The present invention relates to devices, delivery systems and methods for implanting an implant, such as a sling, at an anatomical site in the body of a patient, such as at the mid-urethra, and methods of making such devices and delivery systems. The devices and delivery systems are relatively inexpensive, provide effective therapy, and their use requires minimal training. In one embodiment of the invention, the devices, delivery systems, and methods of the invention can be used to treat female urinary incontinence, including stress incontinence. The benefits of the invention described herein include a delivery system that minimizes or prevents contamination of the implant and minimizes or prevents contamination of the patient's tissue while simultaneously introducing a therapeutic agent or drug such as an antibiotic to the patient's tissues during delivery of the implant to the anatomical site. Moreover, the system according to the invention, allows the operator to adjust and position the implant at the anatomical site in the patient's body and to maintain the correct position of the implant at the anatomical site during and after removal of the delivery system. In addition, the system, according to the invention, provides a simple means for attaching the implant to a delivery assembly. The delivery assembly can be used for a plurality of surgical approaches to the urethra such as a transvaginal and a transabdominal approach (e.g., percutaneous) and assists the operator in accurate positioning of the implant at the anatomical site in the patient's body.
In one aspect, the invention includes a system for implanting an implant in a body. In one embodiment of the invention, the delivery system includes a delivery assembly and an attachment piece. In another embodiment, the delivery system further includes an envelope having an inner surface and an outer surface enclosing the implant. At least one of the inner or outer surface of the envelope includes at least one therapeutic agent, for example, an antimicrobial drug, such as an antibiotic. In one embodiment according to the invention, the material used to make the envelope is an absorbent material. Alternatively, the material used to make the envelope is selected from the group including polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester, polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g., TEFLON®), TYVEK®, MYLAR®, and co-polymers, thereof. In yet another embodiment, the envelope may be coated on the inner or the outer surface with a hydrophilic or a hydrophobic agent. The coating may be selected from the group consisting of synthetic coatings and natural coatings, one or more of which may be an absorbent coating.
In one embodiment according to the invention, the envelope includes a tearable region such as a region of the envelope having apertures, for example, slits or cuts. Alternatively, at least a portion of the envelope includes a tearable material, i.e., a material that may be pulled apart into pieces by application of some force, such as a material having a highly oriented molecular orientation, for example, a linear molecular orientation. In yet another embodiment, the envelope is a composite of a first material and a second material, for example, a composite of a tearable material and a material that does not tear. The tearable region may include a seam where a first material of a first side and a second material of a second side are coupled to form an envelope. Alternatively, the tearable region may include an external tab that is adjacent the envelope outer surface. When the tab is pulled the envelope tears. In another embodiment the tearable region includes an internal tab that is enclosed within the inner surface of the envelope. The internal tab tears the envelope when pulled.
In another embodiment of the invention, the envelope includes at least two sleeves. The two sleeves may include at least one pull tab. In one embodiment, the sleeves include at least one hinge section. In this embodiment of the invention, the hinge section of one sleeve may be coupled to the hinge section of the other sleeve. In another embodiment according to the invention, the system includes a spacer, such as a clamp, for joining two or more sleeves. The clamp may include a bulk material, a balloon or a pressure sensor.
In yet another embodiment, the envelope includes at least one positioning member for positioning the implant at the anatomical site in the body of the patient. In another embodiment, the envelope includes at least one attachment piece.
In one embodiment according to the invention, an antimicrobial drug, for example, an antibiotic, is disposed on the inner surface of the envelope. Alternatively, or in addition, an antimicrobial drug is disposed on the outer surface of the envelope. The envelope may be manufactured from absorbent materials and the drug may be absorbed through this absorbent material to both the inner and outer surfaces of the envelope.
In another embodiment according to the invention, the drug, such as an antibiotic, may be bonded to or may associate with the envelope material or with the one or more coatings applied to the inner or outer surface of the envelope. Alternatively, the one or more surface coatings may be absorbent and absorb the drug. The release and delivery of the drug from the envelope surface to the anatomical site of the patient's body will depend, in part, on the bonding affinity shared by the drug and the coating. When the bond is relatively weak, the drug will be released from the envelope more readily than when the bond is relatively strong.
In another aspect, the system according to the invention includes the envelope configured to enclose an implant, and a spacer disposed on at least one of said inner surface or outer surfaces of the envelope that is useful for positioning the implant at an anatomical site in the body of a patient. In one embodiment of the invention, the spacer includes a bulk material, such as a hydrogel, polyethylene, or cellulose. In another embodiment, the spacer includes a balloon that may be filled with a gas or liquid. In yet another embodiment, the spacer is a clamp including a first member and a second member. The thickness of, for example, the first member may provide the spacer thickness that is useful for positioning the implant. Alternatively, a balloon or a bulk material may be added to the exterior surface of the first member of the clamp to adjust the spacer thickness. In yet another embodiment, the system according to the invention includes a pressure sensor positioned, for example, at the spacer, for determining the amount of tension applied to the implant after the implant is positioned in the body. In addition, the pressure sensor may reveal the amount of tension applied to the envelope or alternatively the amount of tension applied to the implant.
In another aspect, the system according to the invention includes an envelope including two sleeves configured to enclose the implant, and a clamp for coupling together the two sleeves. The clamp includes a first member and a second member. In one embodiment of the invention, a portion of the sleeves overlaps and the clamp secures together the overlapping portions of the sleeves. The clamp may releasably couple the sleeves. In this embodiment, the sleeves may be the same or different lengths. In one embodiment the two or more sleeves are the same length.
In another aspect, the system according to the invention includes the envelope enclosing the implant, the envelope further includes at least one tab joined at a first or second end of the envelope for positioning the implant in the body. In one embodiment, the tab is a positioning member for positioning the implant in the body of the patient. The envelope may include two or more sleeves and a hinge. In another embodiment, the envelope having two or more sleeves and/or a hinge includes at least one attachment piece. In yet another embodiment, each sleeve may include a hinge section, the hinge sections of two sleeves may be coupled to one another.
In another aspect of the invention, an attachment piece is provided for joining an implant, such as a sling, to a delivery assembly. The attachment piece includes a first member bonded to the implant. The first member engageable with a second member wherein the first member is seated in the second member to join the implant to the delivery assembly. In another embodiment, the first member of the attachment piece includes an appendage to which the implant is bonded. The appendage and the first member may be manufactured from polyethylene and may be bonded to the implant by an adhesive, by suturing, or by heat bonding. In one embodiment, the appendage includes a free end that is bonded to the implant.
In another aspect of the invention, the system includes a delivery assembly for delivering an implant to an anatomical site in the body of a patient. In one embodiment, the delivery assembly includes a retractable point, a delivery handle including a proximal button, and a distal button. The proximal and distal buttons are operatively joined to the retractable point. Each of the proximal button and the distal button move the retractable point from a first position to a second position. In one embodiment of the invention, the delivery assembly further includes a cannula having a lumen. The cannula may include an arc. The retractable point of the delivery assembly may be positioned in the lumen of the cannula.
In yet another embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the delivery assembly may further include a dilator tube and an extender button positioned on the elongated body portion of the delivery handle. The extender button is operatively joined to the dilator tube and extends and retracts the dilator tube from the distal end of the elongated body portion of the delivery handle. The dilator tube includes a hollow member. In one embodiment, the hollow member further includes a rigid ring attached to the wall of the hollow member.
In another embodiment of the invention, the dilator tube includes a conical tip. The conical tip includes a hinge and the hinge may be a portion of the wall of the tube. In one embodiment according to the invention, the first member of the attachment piece is sized and shaped to fit within the lumen of the dilator tube. The first member includes a first and second portion enclosed by the dilator tube when the first member and dilator tube are anchored together. In one embodiment of the invention, the first member includes a first end having a slit. In one embodiment, when the first member is anchored in the dilator tube, the appendage is positioned between the conical tip and the tube. In another embodiment, the conical tip is sized and shaped to be seated on the first portion of the first member to anchor the first member to the dilator tube. In yet another embodiment, when the first member and the dilator tube are engaged, the first portion of the first member extends from the lumen of the dilator tube. The conical tip is positioned at the tissue piercing end of the delivery assembly and may also include an aperture. The aperture may provide an opening through which a cannula may emerge.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for positioning an implant at an anatomical site in the body of a patient. In this method, a system is provided that includes an implant and an envelope. The envelope is configured to enclose the implant and includes a drug disposed on at least one of an inner or an outer surface of the envelope. The system is inserted in the patient's body to an anatomical site to be treated. The drug is released from the envelope and delivered to the anatomical site in the patient's body. The implant is positioned at the anatomical site and the envelope is removed from the patient's body. After removal of the envelope, the implant remains where it was positioned at the anatomical site. In one embodiment of the method of the invention, the implant is positioned at the mid-urethra of the patient to treat, for example, female urinary incontinence. In a particular embodiment, the envelope has a visible indication mark on or at least visible from the envelope outer surface to assist the operator positioning the implant at the anatomical site in the body of the patient.
It is a further object of the method of the invention to provide an envelope enclosing an implant, such as a surgical mesh, to a damaged portion of a patient's body, wherein the envelope delivers drugs to the damaged area upon placement of the surgical mesh inside the patient's body. The surgical mesh may be, for example, a sling or other type of mesh that is shaped to fit the mid-urethra of a female patient.
In another aspect, the invention includes a method of positioning an implant at an anatomical site in the body of a patient. In one embodiment of the method, a system includes an envelope having at least two sleeves enclosing an implant, and a clamp that couples the sleeves together. The system is inserted into the patient's body and positioned at the anatomical site to be treated. Once the system enclosing the implant is positioned, the clamp is unfastened and removed from the patient's body followed by uncoupling and removal of the sleeves from the patient's body. The implant remains positioned at the anatomical site to be treated in the patient's body.
In another aspect, the invention is a method for positioning an implant at an anatomical site in the body of a patient. According to this method of the invention, a system is provided including an envelope having a lumen sized to enclose the implant and a tab disposed at each of a first end and a second end of the envelope. The operator inserts the system in the body of the patient, grasps the tabs disposed at each of the first and second ends of the envelope, positions the implant in the body, and removes the envelope from the body. In one embodiment the tab includes a positioning member for positioning the envelope enclosing an implant in the patient's body. The envelope may include a visual indication mark or a positioning mark for positioning the implant in the patient's body.
In another aspect, the invention is a method for delivering an implant to an anatomical site in the body of a patient. According to this method, the operator attaches the implant to the attachment piece, and the attachment piece is secured to the delivery assembly. In one embodiment where the attachment piece is pre-attached to the envelope, the operator attaches the pre-attached attachment piece and envelope onto the delivery assembly, to form the delivery system. In one embodiment, the delivery assembly includes a handle, a retractable point, a proximal button, and a distal button. Alternatively, the delivery assembly further includes a dilator tube and an extender button. The retractable point is extended by actuating or moving either the proximal or the distal button. In one embodiment, the implant attached to the delivery assembly provides the delivery system, and the delivery system is introduced into the body of the patient and positioned at the anatomical site. The implant is detached from the delivery assembly and the delivery assembly is withdrawn. In another embodiment, the delivery assembly is introduced into the body of the patient then the implant is attached to the delivery assembly and positioned at the anatomical site. Thereafter the implant is detached from the delivery assembly and the delivery assembly is withdrawn from the body of the patient. In another embodiment of the invention the method further includes grasping the tabs at the end of the envelope and tearing the envelope to remove it from the implant and then from the body.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following description and from the claims.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
In general, the invention described herein is a system for implanting an implant into the body of a patient. Referring to
In one aspect, the invention relates to an envelope for enclosing the implant. The envelope includes a therapeutic drug, such as an antibiotic, on the outer surface, the inner surface, or both the outer and inner surface of the envelope.
In one embodiment of the invention illustrated in
Referring to
In one embodiment according to the invention, the implant is a surgical mesh 10. The surgical mesh 10 may be fabricated from one or more yarns and the yarns maybe made from one or more materials. Non-limiting materials that may be employed include polypropylene, polyesters, polyolefins, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyethylene, polyurethanes, nylons, and copolymers thereof as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,042,592, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. The surgical mesh 10 may be a hybrid of synthetic materials and tissues; the implant 10 may be directed to slings described in, for example, U.S. Ser. No. 09/916,983, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. The surgical mesh 10 may also be made for absorbable materials, such as, polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid and other suitable absorbable materials.
The yarn may include a plurality of filaments, alternatively, a monofilament yarn may be employed. In one embodiment, the mesh is a polypropylene monofilament tricot mesh for use in surgical applications. Within a mesh 10, each yarn may have void areas between yarn filaments. The process used to fabricate the mesh 10 may create crevices in the mesh 10. Multifilament yarns have multiple voids or interstitial spaces between the yarn filaments. Mesh 10, according to the invention, may be produced according to a variety of fabrication processes known to the skilled artisan including, but not limited to, knitting, weaving, or braiding. Meshes fabricated using multifilament yarns may have both crevices and interstitial voids. In one embodiment according to the invention, the surgical mesh 10 is enclosed within the envelope 20 that surrounds the surgical mesh 10. The envelope 20 surrounding the mesh 10 reduces the likelihood that the mesh 10 will become contaminated with foreign matter such as bacteria during the procedure placing the mesh at an anatomical site in the body of the patient.
With continued reference to
The longitudinal axis 13 of the sling 10 may range from about 3.9 inches to about 24.0 inches, or between about 15.7 inches to about 19.7 inches, preferably about 17.7 inches. The width 14 of the sling 10 is between about 0.39 inches and about 1 inch, preferably about 0.43 inches. Referring still to
Referring still to
The envelope 20 may be used to assist in handling the sling 10 and/or to assist in adjusting the sling 10 during surgical placement. For example, the envelope 20 aides in preventing the sling 10 from stretching or becoming misshapen due to the sling 10's handling prior to placement of the sling 10 at the anatomical site within the body of the patient.
In one aspect, the invention provides a system for delivering the implant 10 having a drug delivery feature. The drug is delivered to the anatomical site in the patient's body and may be selected according to the physician's preference. Exemplary drugs are preferably soluble in water or other biologically inert solution, and include but are not limited to antimicrobials and antibiotics, such as neomycin and sulfa drugs, and anti-inflammatory agents such as steroidal or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. The drug is released to the patient tissues upon contact with the tissues. Thus, the drugs that are delivered to the patient tissue surfaces when accessing and inserting the envelope 20 are active upon contact with the patient's tissue during implantation of the implant.
For example, referring again to
In another embodiment, according to the invention, the envelope 20 is made from a non-wettable material such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester, polytetrafluoroethylene, TYVEK®, MYLAR®, or co-polymers thereof. Polytetrafluoroethylene is suitable for use in accordance with the present invention is available from DuPont (Wilmington, Del., under the trade designation TEFLON®). These non-wettable materials do not uptake any liquids, for example, solutions of drugs. In order to permit drugs to bond or absorb to these non-wettable material surfaces, the inner surface 30 and/or the outer surface 40 of the envelope 20 is pre-treated with a substance that is wettable such as, for example, a wettable coating composition. The wettable coating composition may be a synthetic coating such as, for example, polyvinylperilidone (PVP) or a natural coating such as, for example, collagen. The coating may be a physically absorbent material such as, for example, a cellulose sponge material. The wettable coating composition may be hydrophilic, which absorbs hydrophilic drugs. In one embodiment, the hydrophilic drug associates with the hydrophilic coating. Alternatively, a hydrophobic drug is disposed on an envelope 20, the envelope 20 including a hydrophobic coating. In some embodiments, a hydrophilic coating traps the hydrophobic drug on the surface of the envelope.
In another embodiment according to the invention, a hydrophobic coating may be applied to one or more surfaces of the envelope 20. Hydrophobic coatings may be used in conjunction with hydrophobic drugs. Where the association between the hydrophobic coating of the envelope 20 and the drug is weak, the drug will be readily released to the tissue surface contacted by the envelope 20. Alternatively, a stronger association between the coating and the drug, i.e., a stronger bonding affinity, may provide a slower release of the drug.
In a particular embodiment according to the invention, the coating applied to the surface of the envelope 20 may have an ionic charge. According to this embodiment of the invention, drugs having a complimentary charge will bond to the charged coating applied to the surface of envelope 20 when the coating and the drug are exposed to one another. The strength of bonding between the drug and the coating will influence how readily the drug is released from the surface of the envelope 20. Where the ionic bonding between the coating on the envelope 20 and the drug is weak, the drug will release more readily. Covalent bonding between the surface coating of the envelope 20 and the drug will diminish drug release.
In one embodiment according to the invention, shown, for example in
In a particular embodiment of the invention, only one of the surfaces of the envelope 20 is coated, for example only the inner surface 30 of envelope 20 is coated. Alternatively, in another embodiment, the outer surface 40 of envelope 20 is coated. The envelope 20 with a coated surface may be dipped into a solution containing a drug, for example, a hydrophilic drug, just prior to surgery. The drug in solution bonds to the hydrophilic coating on envelope 20. In another embodiment, the hydrophilic coating and the hydrophilic drug are mixed to form a single coating. The hydrophilic coating may be disposed on the outer surface 40, the inner surface 30, or both the outer surface 40 and the inner surface 30 of the envelope 20. In one embodiment, the envelope contains a pre-loaded drug or drug and coating mixture. In yet another embodiment the envelope 20 is not coated, but when dipped into a drug solution just prior to the surgery the drug coats the surface of the envelope 20 and/or a sufficient amount of drug, for example, between about 0.5 ml to about 3 ml, is trapped within the envelope 20.
Referring again to
In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the outer surface 40 of the envelope 20 is coated with the hydrophobic coating and drug combination mixture.
Hydrophilic coatings may be water soluble and suitable water soluble hydrophilic coatings are available from Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Mass., under the trade designations HydroPlus and HydroPass. Hyoscymine sulfate may be used in accordance with the invention that is available under the trade designation CYTOSPAZ from Polymedica (Woburn, Mass.). Ketrolac tromethamine is available under the trade designation Toradol from Roche Pharmaceuticals (Nutley, N.J.). Hydrophilic drugs that may be employed in accordance with the invention include oxybutynin chloride, lidocaine, ketorolac, and hyoscymine sulfate. Suitable hydrophobic drugs include ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac. Hydrophobic coatings that may be employed in accordance with the invention include polytetrafluoroethylene, silicon, and Pyrelene.
In another embodiment according to the invention illustrated in
Referring still to
In one embodiment of the invention illustrated in
The one or more apertures 50 disposed on the envelope 20 are, for example, slits disposed through the envelope 20. The apertures 50 are disposed in the envelope 20 to provide an opening on envelope 20 to permit drugs to enter the lumen 185 of envelope 20 and contact the inner surface 30 of the envelope 20. In one embodiment, the apertures 50 range in size from about 1/16 inch to about ¼ inch in greatest dimension and permit fluid exchange in and out of the lumen 185 of the envelope 20. In one embodiment, the material used to manufacture the envelope 20 is porous, for example, polytetrafluoroethylene or polyethylene material and may be stretched so that the pores measure about 1 micron or greater.
In one embodiment, the one or more apertures 50 may be disposed so as to permit a solution to flow into the lumen 185 of the envelope 20 but not flow out, i.e., a one way channel. In another embodiment, the one or more apertures 50 disposed through the envelope 20 may be pores or slits. Such apertures 50 may range in size from about 1 micron to about ¼ inch in largest dimension. A relatively large aperture 50, for example, between about 1/16 inch and about ¼ inch in largest dimension enables the drug containing solution to readily enter into and contact the inner surface 30 of the envelope 20 when the envelope 20 is soaked in the solution containing the drug. Some of the solution also escapes from the envelope 20. In another embodiment, the one ore more apertures 50 are too small, i.e. about 5 microns, to permit the solution to escape from the envelope 20.
Shown in
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the tear feature 60 perforations may double as the apertures 50 that permit the solution in which the envelope 20 is immersed to enter the lumen 185 of the envelope 20 and to contact the inner surface 30 of the envelope 20. For example, where the tear feature 60 is a series of apertures 50 through the envelope 20, the apertures 50 permit the drug solution to penetrate through the envelope 20 to the lumen 185 to contact the inner surface 30 of the envelope 20 when the envelope 20 is soaked in the drug solution.
Alternatively, the tear feature 60 includes a material that may be easily torn open. Such easily torn materials include, but are not limited to, for example, a material with a molecular orientation such as a linear low density polyethylene or linear polytetrafluoroethylene (e.g. TEFLON®). The entire envelope 20 may be manufactured from these materials. Alternatively, only one or more portions of the envelope 20 are manufactured from such “tearable” materials and/or construction methods, i.e., sections comprising linear low density polyethylene and/or a series of perforations or apertures 50 over a region of the envelope. In another embodiment, according to the invention, the tear feature 60 also includes an envelope 20 with tabs 188 and 198 that may be torn away, as described in detail below in accordance with, for example,
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the envelope is a composite of two or more materials. Referring now to
In one embodiment, the first material of the first side 21 of envelope 20 is selected from the group of tearable materials, that includes, for example, polypropylene, nylon, a material with a molecular orientation such as a linear low-density polyethylene or other available flexible films. In another embodiment, the second material on the second side 23 of envelope 20 may be a material that does not tear, for example, polytetrafluoroethylene, TYVEK®, MYLAR® or other materials such as, for example, thermoplastics. According to the invention, the composite envelope 20 may be formed of two different materials that do not tear, for example, a first side 21 having TYVEK® and a second side 23 having MYLAR®. Alternatively, the composite envelope 20 may be formed of two materials that tear, such as a first side 21 of polyethylene and a second side 23 of polypropylene.
Referring again to
Alternatively, when the first side 21 is placed on top of the second side 23, the second side 23 that is adjacent to the first side 21 may include a melt liner. A melt liner is a layer or a portion of a layer that when added to the first side 21 and/or the second side 23 aids in forming the seam 27 between the first side 21 and the second side 23, when, for example, the sides 21 and 23 are exposed to a desirable temperature range. Suitable melt liners that may be employed include, for example, low density polyethylene, polyurethane, and polyester. In one embodiment, the second side 23 includes a material that cannot tear, for example, TYVEK®. In one embodiment, at least the side of the TYVEK® adjacent the first side 21 is coated with a melt liner, the melt liner enables the first side 21 and the second side 23 to heat seal to form seam 27 of envelope 20. In yet another embodiment of the envelope 20 shown in
In a particular embodiment, referring again to
In another aspect, referring now to
In one embodiment according to the invention, the spacer 100 illustrated in
In a particular embodiment, shown in
Referring now to
In one embodiment, referring still to
As shown in the embodiment illustrated in
Alternatively, as shown in
In yet another embodiment, illustrated in
In one embodiment, the balloon 111 is positioned on the inner surface 30 of the first side 21 of envelope 20. In another embodiment, the balloon 111 is positioned on the outer surface 40 of the first side of envelope 20. The balloon 111 may be disposed along the entire length of the first side 21 of envelope 20. Alternatively, as shown in
The balloon 111 may be made from the same materials as the envelope 20. These materials include, but are not limited to, for example, an absorbent material, such as a sponge-like material, or polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester, polytetrafluoroethylene or copolymers thereof. Alternatively, the balloon 111 may be made of a different material than the material used to make the envelope 20. The balloon 111 may be placed on the envelope 20 according to methods known to the skilled person, for example, by gluing, sewing, tying, or melting onto a surface of envelope 20. In one embodiment, the balloon 111 is filled with a fluid or a gas and then joined to the exterior surface 40 of the first side 21 of the envelope 20. Alternatively, the balloon 111 may be filled with a gas or liquid after the balloon 111 is joined to the envelope 20. In yet another embodiment, the balloon 111 is integral with, i.e., fabricated in the envelope 20 when the envelope 20 is fabricated.
The balloon 111 may be filled with a gas or a fluid, for example, water, sterilized water, saline, or a bulk material such as, for example, polyethylene or a hydrogel, such as, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, PBS phosphate buffered saline, or combinations thereof. In another embodiment, the balloon 111 may be filled to a thickness 103 between about 0.08 inches to about 0.8 inches, preferably about 0.2 inches to about 0.6 inches. The extent of inflation of the balloon 111 may vary according to operator preference, the size of the patient, the anatomical location where the balloon is positioned, or other factors. In one embodiment, the balloon 111 is filled by the operator prior to commencing the surgical procedure. Alternatively, the balloon 111 is filled after the envelope 20 enclosing the implant 10 is introduced into the anatomical site of the patient's body.
In one embodiment, according to the invention, the balloon 111 may be filled by inserting a needle coupled to a syringe into the balloon 111 and injecting the contents of the syringe, e.g., air, water, sterilized water, saline, bulk material, or a combination thereof, into the balloon 111. Alternatively, the balloon 111 may include a valve and the balloon is subsequently filled by injecting the contents of the syringe into the balloon 111. In one embodiment, the balloon 111 is pre-filled and pre-attached to envelope 20.
In another embodiment, shown in
Referring to
In another embodiment, the clamp 110 includes a pressure sensitive mechanism, i.e., a pressure sensor 101. In one embodiment, illustrated in
Referring again to
In another embodiment according to the invention the envelope 20 and/or the clamp 110 are tinted. In one embodiment, only a portion of the envelope 20 is tinted, for example, about the longitudinal axis 22 of envelope 20. The envelope 20 and the clamp 110 may be the same color or alternatively, they may be tinted differently. In yet another embodiment, a pattern or design is applied to on the envelope 20 and/or the clamp 110. In a preferred embodiment, the envelope 20 is tinted blue which is visible under the light from a cytoscope that is used when implanting the sling 10 into the body of the patient. In another embodiment, the envelope 20 is tinted black. In yet another embodiment, a spacer, a clamp, a tinted area or other indication mark provides a visual indication of the placement of the sling 10. The visual indication may be employed to inform the operator about the orientation of the sling 10, for example, whether the sling 10 is facing up, facing down or is twisted. In one preferred embodiment, the visual indication mark is on the center of the envelope 20 enclosing the sling 10. In one preferred procedure, with continued reference to
In yet another embodiment, as shown, for example, in
In another aspect, the invention is a system for delivering an implant enclosed in an envelope. In one embodiment, according to the invention, the envelope 20 has two or more sleeves 20A, 20B that are positioned such that one end of the first sleeve 20A overlaps an adjacent end of the second sleeve 20B. The two sleeves 20A, 20B enclose the implant 10. For example, referring to
The length of first sleeve 20A, measured from the distal end 150 to the proximal end 154, may range from about 2.0 inches to about 15.4 inches, preferably 11.0 inches. The length of second sleeve 20B, measured from the proximal end 160 to the distal end 164, may range from about 2.0 inches to about 15.4 inches, preferably 11.0 inches. In one embodiment, the first and second sleeves 20A and 20B, are of equal length from their distal end to proximal end.
The longitudinal axis 22 of the envelope 20, measured between the first side 201 and the second side 202, ranges from about 3.6 inches to about 30.4 inches, or between about 11.8 inches and about 23.6 inches in length, preferably 19.7 inches. The width 24 of the envelope 20 measured between the top side 203 and the bottom side 204 of envelope 20 may range from about 0.2 inches to about 2.0 inches, or between about 0.5 inches and about 0.8 inches, preferably 0.6 inches.
In another embodiment according to the invention illustrated in
In another aspect, the invention includes a method for positioning the sling 10 at an anatomical site in a patient's body, for example, positioning a mid-urethral sling for the treatment of female urinary incontinence. In one embodiment of the method according to the invention, the clamp 110 is placed at about the mid point of the sling 10, for example, as illustrated in
In one embodiment of the method according to the invention, the operator positions the envelope 20, shown in
In yet another embodiment according to the invention, the envelope 20 including first sleeve 20A, second sleeve 20B, the sling 10, and the clamp 110, shown in
In another aspect, the invention includes a system for delivering an envelope and an implant. In one embodiment, shown in
Referring to
Referring still to
Referring still to
As shown in
In a particular embodiment, the top section 150A is not fully pulled into the sleeve 20A, such that an overlap region 150C of the top section 150A remains on the outer surface 40 of the first sleeve 20A. The overlap region 150C ranges between about 0.04 inches to about 1.2 inches, preferably about 0.3 inches. The length of the bottom section 150B, measured from the angle 172 and the angle 174 along the longitudinal axis 22A to the distal end 150 of the bottom section 150B, may measure between about 2.0 inches to about 14.0 inches, preferably about 10.0 inches.
Still referring to
Referring still to
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring to
In another embodiment, illustrated in
Similarly, referring to
As shown in
In another embodiment according to the invention, referring to
With reference to FIGS. 8A and 9A-9D, in another aspect the invention includes a method for positioning the implant at an anatomical site in the body of a patient. According to one embodiment of this method of the invention, the operator positions the envelope 20 enclosing sling 10, illustrated for example in
Referring now to
Still Referring to
In other embodiment, illustrated in
In yet another aspect, the invention provides an envelope 20 illustrated in
As illustrated in
Referring still to
In some embodiments, the free end of the first top 201A includes a tab 188. Similarly the free end of the second top 202A includes a tab 198. Tabs 188 and 198, that are connected to the first top 201A and the second top 202A respectively, may be constructed as described above with reference to tab 188 and
Referring now to
As shown in
As illustrated in
According to one embodiment of the method of the invention, the operator positions the envelope 20 enclosing sling 10 at the anatomical site, for example as illustrated in
Once positioned, the operator accesses the tab 188 joined to the first top 201A and tab 198 joined to the second top 202B, which are located in the area of the patients vagina. The operator grasps tab 188 coupled to the first top 201A and pulls the tab 188 in the direction of 190. The force on tab 188 coupled to the first top 201A tears a portion of the top side 234 of envelope 20. Thereafter the operator grasps tab 198 coupled to the second top 202A and pulls the tab 198 in the direction of 190. Similarly the force on tab 198 coupled to the second top 202A tears the remaining portion of the top side 234 of envelope 20. Finally the operator pulls the tab 208 to remove the bottom side 236 of envelope 20 from the body of the patient. In some embodiments, the bottom side 236 may be split into two pieces, for example, in the area of diagonal cut 224, accordingly, in such cases both the tab 208 coupled to the first bottom 201B and the tab 198 coupled to the second bottom 202B will be pulled away from the direction of the patients body.
In another embodiment, the implant 10 longitudinal axis is at least equal to the length of the envelope 20. In this embodiment, the implant 10 may be held within the envelope 20 by the tabs 208 and 218, for example, where the tabs are adhesive, the implant may be held within the envelope 20 by the tabs 208 and 218 disposed at each end of the envelope 20. In such embodiments, during the placement procedure, after the tabs 208 and 218 are external to the patient's body, the operator may uncouple the tabs 208 and 218, freeing implant 10. According to this method of the invention, the tabs 208 and 218 are uncoupled prior to removing the envelope 20 from the body of the patient.
In another aspect, the invention relates to an attachment piece 350 for attaching the sling 10 or the envelope 20 enclosing the sling 10, to a delivery assembly 650. In one embodiment of the invention illustrated in
Referring still to
The cylinder member 400 is divided into a first portion 410 at one end of the cylinder and a second portion 420 at the end opposite to the first portion 410. The length of the first portion 410 is 20-40% and the length of the second portion 420 at the opposite end of the cylinder is 60-80% of the total length of the cylinder member 400. In one embodiment of the invention, an appendage 430 extends laterally outward from the wall 414 of the cylinder member 400 at the interface 412 of the first portion 410 of the cylinder member 400 and the second portion 420 of the cylinder member 400 as shown in
Referring still to
Referring now to
Thus, accordingly to the invention, the implantable device 10 is bonded, or otherwise securely attached, to the cylinder member 400. The implantable device 10 is not clamped, clipped, or pierced. Accordingly, the implantable device 10 other than being bonded to a member 400, is free to be manipulated in a plurality of planes when it is introduced into the patient's body.
The free end 435 of the appendage 430 and the free end 436 of the envelope 20, are attached by, for example, heat bonding, suturing or adhesive bonding. If heat is used to bond the appendage 430 to the envelope 20, the glass transition range of the materials used to manufacture the appendage 430 and the envelope 20 must be similar to permit a satisfactory bond joint. In a particular embodiment of the invention, the appendage 430 and the envelope 20 are manufactured from the same materials, for example, the material used to manufacture appendage 430 and envelope 20 may be polyethylene.
Referring now to
Referring to
Illustrated in
Referring to
Referring now to
The second portion 420 of the cylinder member 400 is cylindrical in shape and hollow. The height of the second portion 420 is 0.07 to 0.7 inches, preferably 0.2 inches, or 2-3 times the height of the first portion 410 of the cylinder member 400. The dimensions of the second portion 420 are configured to enable the second portion 420 to be seated within the lumen 540 of the dilator tube 500, described below. The dimensions of the first portion 410 and the second portion 420 of cylinder member 400 may be configured to permit the cylinder member 400 to enter the lumen 540 of dilator tube 500 one way, i.e., so that the second portion 420 is inserted into the dilator tube 500 lumen 540. These dimensions are selected to prevent inadvertent introduction of the first portion 410 of cylinder member 400 into the lumen 540 of the dilator tube 500. This one way configuration of the cylinder member 400 with the lumen 540 of dilator tube 500 assures proper positioning of the implant 10 inside the patient's body. In one embodiment of the invention, the free end 417 of the second portion 420 of cylinder member 400 has a chamfered edge to permit its ease of location in the lumen 540 of dilator tube 500.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring still to
Referring now to
With continued reference to
Referring still to
Referring still to
With continued reference to
The cone 460 tapers from the cone first end 461 to a cone second end 464. In one embodiment, an aperture 470 is positioned at the second end 464. The taper of the cone 460 parallels the taper of the second portion 584 of the collet 580. The similar tapers of the cone 460 and the second portion 584 of the collet 580 enable the second end 584 of the collet 580 to fit snugly within the lumen 465 of the cone 460. The cone 460 includes a surface 468 on the outside surface of the cone 460 for attachment of the implant 10 or sleeve 20.
Referring to
In another embodiment of the invention, the cone 460 includes an orientation key to permit assembly of the cone 460 to a predetermined orientation on the collet 580 during assembly of the attachment piece 350.
In another aspect, referring again to
In another embodiment of the invention, the delivery system 2 of the invention includes a delivery assembly 650. Referring now to
Referring now to
In one embodiment of the invention, the proximal button 713 is positioned on the surface of the elongated member 710 at the proximal end 712 on one side of the handle 700. In a particular embodiment according to the invention, the distal button 715 is positioned on the elongated member 710 at the distal end 714 of the elongated member 710 on the same side of the handle 700 as the proximal button 713. In one embodiment according to the invention, the extender button 717 is positioned on a side other than the side of the handle 700 on which the proximal button 713 and distal button 715 are positioned. For example, referring to
Referring again to
Referring now to
In another embodiment of the dilator tube 500, illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring now to
In another embodiment of the delivery assembly 650, the cannula 600, illustrated in
As illustrated in
In another embodiment, the cannula 600 or the distal end portion of the cannula 600 is detachable from the delivery assembly 650.
Another aspect of the invention includes a method for delivering an implantable device 10 to an anatomical site in the body using the delivery assembly 650 according to the invention. An anatomical site includes, for example, the mid-urethra, prostate or neck of the urinary bladder. According to one embodiment of the method, a transvaginal approach is used with the envelope 20 enclosing implant 10, such as, for example, a PINNACLE Sling manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Mass. The sling 10 is secured to the delivery assembly 650 by first bonding the sling 10 to the cylinder member 400 by heat bonding, adhesive or by other methods known to the skilled person. The dilator tube 500 is placed in the extended position illustrated in
In another embodiment, the lumen 709 of delivery handle 700 has one or more locking regions in which dilator tube 500 may be locked in place as the operator moves dilator tube 500 from the first position E to the second position D. According to this embodiment, the operator may use both cannula 600 and dilator tube 500 to push through the rectus fascia, abdominal fascia and the abdominal wall when traversing from the vagina to the region to the pubic tubercle of the patient during the procedure. According to this embodiment, the sling 10 may be attached to the delivery assembly 650 prior to moving the dilator 500 and cannula 600 through the patient's tissue. Alternatively, the sling 10 may be attached to the delivery assembly 650 only after the tissue has been initially penetrated.
In an alternative approach to this method, the mid-urethra is approached percutaneously through the abdominal wall, abdominal fascia, and the rectus fascia rather than transvaginally as described above. In this method according to the invention, the dilator tube 500 is advanced over the cannula 600 by moving extender button 717 on the handle 700 from first position E to the second position D. In one embodiment, the extender button 717 is reversibly moveable through a plurality of positions from the first position E to the second position D. As shown in
Another embodiment of the method for implanting an implant 10 at an anatomical site in the body of a patient includes the steps of providing an implant 10 enclosed in an envelope 20. The method further includes coating the envelope 20 with at least one drug, such as an antibiotic, on the inner surface, the outer surface, or both the inner and outer surface of the envelope. The method according to the invention may further include the step of providing a therapeutic drug dispersed on the envelope to the patients tissues.
In another embodiment, the method of the invention may further include the steps of positioning the implant 10 enclosed within the envelope 20 at the anatomical site in the body, and removing the envelope 20 while the implant 10 remains positioned at the anatomical site in the body of the patient. In yet another embodiment, the method of the invention may further include tearing the envelope 20 at the tearable region 50 of the envelope 20, and removing the envelope 20 from the body.
In another embodiment, the method of the invention includes the step of providing a spacer 100 to position the implant 10 at the target anatomical site in the patient's body. The method may further include the step of measuring the tension applied to the sling 10 by a pressure sensor 101.
Variations, modifications, and other implementations of what is described herein will occur to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as claimed. Accordingly, the invention is to be defined not by the preceding illustrative description but instead by the spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application is based on and claims priority to provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/274,843 filed in the United States Patent Office on Mar. 9, 2001 and provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/286,863 filed in the United States Patent Office on Apr. 26, 2001, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 246648 | Wilcox | Sep 1881 | A |
| 1179910 | Greenfield | Apr 1916 | A |
| 1310982 | Davis | Jul 1919 | A |
| 1417669 | Langworthy | May 1922 | A |
| 1517787 | Langbein | Dec 1924 | A |
| 1612697 | Cecil | Dec 1926 | A |
| 1677671 | Councill | Jul 1928 | A |
| 2113246 | Wappler | Apr 1938 | A |
| 2199025 | Conn | Apr 1940 | A |
| 2200120 | Nauth | May 1940 | A |
| 2454680 | Stephens | Nov 1948 | A |
| 2487502 | Willinsky | Nov 1949 | A |
| 2556783 | Wallace | Jun 1951 | A |
| 2635238 | Garland | Apr 1953 | A |
| 2655921 | Haboush | Oct 1953 | A |
| 2666430 | Gispert | Jan 1954 | A |
| 2671444 | Pease, Jr. | Mar 1954 | A |
| 2738790 | Todt, Sr. et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
| 2751903 | Ivory et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
| 2917878 | Edwin et al. | Dec 1959 | A |
| 2973859 | Schladermundt et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3003155 | Mielzynski et al. | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3054406 | Usher | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
| 3181533 | Heath | May 1965 | A |
| 3212502 | Myers | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3314431 | Smith, Jr. | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3364200 | Ashton et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3388847 | Kasulin et al. | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3551987 | Wilkinson | Jan 1971 | A |
| 3580313 | McKnight | May 1971 | A |
| 3593903 | Astafiev et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3596656 | Kaute | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3620212 | Fannon, Jr. et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3666750 | Briskin et al. | May 1972 | A |
| 3699969 | Allen | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3705575 | Edwards | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3710592 | Scow | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3710795 | Higuchi et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3739784 | Itoh | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3744495 | Johnson | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3823705 | Trimble | Jul 1974 | A |
| 3857396 | Hardwick | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3866611 | Baumrucker | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3875937 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3877434 | Ferguson et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3890977 | Wilson | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3892232 | Neufeld | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3918455 | Coplan | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3937223 | Roth | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4006747 | Kronenthal et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4065816 | Sawyer | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4085756 | Weaver | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4159716 | Borchers | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4175557 | Hung | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4193137 | Heck | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4217890 | Owens | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4347847 | Usher | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4371124 | Gifford et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4391869 | Cook et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4392495 | Bayers | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4400833 | Kurland | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4409974 | Freedland | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4414967 | Shapiro | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4415111 | McHarrie et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4421112 | Mains et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4422567 | Haynes | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4438769 | Pratt et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4452245 | Usher | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4520821 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4527726 | Assell et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4535768 | Hourahane et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4537185 | Stednitz | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549545 | Levy | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4569469 | Mongeon et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4576167 | Noiles | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4592339 | Kuzmak et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4606335 | Wedeen | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4606343 | Conta et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4614187 | Mulhollan et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4625726 | Duthoy | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4633871 | Shinozuka | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4635634 | Santos | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4652264 | Dumican | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4655219 | Petruzzi | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4655221 | Devereux | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4664305 | Blake, III et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4665906 | Jervis | May 1987 | A |
| 4669473 | Richards et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4688555 | Wardle | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4691705 | Okada | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4694781 | Howe et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4705040 | Mueller et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4738255 | Goble et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4739751 | Sapega et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
| 4741335 | Okada | May 1988 | A |
| 4744353 | McFarland | May 1988 | A |
| 4750492 | Jacobs | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4763669 | Jaeger | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4768505 | Okada et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4769038 | Bendavid et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4784126 | Hourahane | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4784137 | Kulik et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4784138 | Sinnett | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4838884 | Dumican et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4854316 | Davis | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4870957 | Goble et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4872451 | Moore et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4873977 | Avant et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4880015 | Nierman | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4883048 | Purnell et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4889119 | Jamiolkowski et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4898156 | Gatturna et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4899743 | Nicholson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905692 | More | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4909789 | Taguchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4911165 | Lennard et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4920958 | Walt et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
| 4926722 | Sorensen et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4940467 | Tronzo | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4944741 | Hasson | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4945920 | Clossick | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4946468 | Li | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4957498 | Caspari et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4960420 | Goble et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4968315 | Gatturna | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4973300 | Wright | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4978351 | Rozas | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4986831 | King et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4988339 | Vadher | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4997433 | Goble et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 4997434 | Seedhom et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 4997436 | Oberlander | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5002550 | Li | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5002551 | Linsky et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5007894 | Enhorning | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
| 5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
| 5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
| 5026398 | May et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5030219 | Matsen, III et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5036867 | Biswas | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040715 | Green et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5046513 | Gatturna et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5052607 | Dutton | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057112 | Sherman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5057114 | Wittich et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059199 | Okada et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5061181 | Niznick | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5064434 | Haber | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5078730 | Li et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5078731 | Hayhurst | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5080674 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5084058 | Li | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5087263 | Li | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5088323 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5089013 | Bezwada et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5098440 | Hillstead | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100417 | Cerier et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102421 | Anspach, Jr. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108397 | White | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5112337 | Paulos et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
| 5116338 | Poggie et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5122155 | Eberbach | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5123924 | Sioshansi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5129902 | Goble et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133723 | Li et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147374 | Fernandez | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5152279 | Wilk | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5152749 | Giesy et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5152790 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5156315 | Green et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163942 | Rydell | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163946 | Li | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5174300 | Bales et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5178630 | Schmitt | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5180388 | DiCarlo | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5192008 | Hwan | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5192303 | Gatturna et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195542 | Gazielly et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197968 | Clement | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5203784 | Ross et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5203787 | Noblitt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207679 | Li | May 1993 | A |
| 5209747 | Knoepfler | May 1993 | A |
| 5217462 | Asnis et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5217486 | Rice et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5222508 | Contarini | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5224946 | Hayhurst et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5236445 | Hayhurst et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242457 | Akopov et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5250033 | Evans | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5251638 | Cottone, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254130 | Poncet et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254133 | Seid | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5256150 | Quiachon et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5257692 | Heacox | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5258000 | Gianturco | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5258016 | DiPoto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263969 | Phillips | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5268001 | Nicholson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5279311 | Snyder | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282812 | Suarez, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289963 | McGarry et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290217 | Campos | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290294 | Cox et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292328 | Hain et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304220 | Maginot | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5311858 | Adair | May 1994 | A |
| 5312433 | Boebel et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5316543 | Eberbach | May 1994 | A |
| 5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5333624 | Tovey | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5334208 | Soehendra et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5356064 | Green et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364002 | Green et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364406 | Sewell, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366460 | Eberbach | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366479 | McGarry et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368595 | Lewis | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368602 | de la Torre | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370282 | Sedlmeier | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372146 | Branch | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5376094 | Kline | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5379933 | Green et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5381943 | Allen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383477 | DeMatteis | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383928 | Scott et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5397332 | Kammerer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411506 | Goble et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417203 | Tovey et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417712 | Whittaker et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5423860 | Lizardi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425489 | Shichman et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425737 | Burbank et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425743 | Nicholas | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425984 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5431173 | Chin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437603 | Cerny et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441502 | Bartlett | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441508 | Gazielly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5443482 | Stone et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451235 | Lock et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5456722 | McCleod et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5474543 | McKay | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5499991 | Garman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500001 | Trott | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501683 | Trott | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501690 | Measamer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5507754 | Green et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5507796 | Hasson | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5520696 | Wenstrom, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
| 5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5522843 | Zang | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5522845 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527341 | Gogolewski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5538427 | Hoffman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540703 | Barker et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549617 | Green et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549619 | Peters et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5569273 | Titone et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571117 | Ahn | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5573548 | Nazre et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578057 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584695 | Lal Sachdeva et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584835 | Greenfield | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5591207 | Coleman | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5601575 | Measamer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607432 | Fucci | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618314 | Harwin et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620012 | Benderev et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5624446 | Harryman, II | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5634931 | Kugel | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5634944 | Magram | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5637112 | Moore et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641502 | Skalla et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641566 | Kranzler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5643288 | Thompson | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643596 | Pruss et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645589 | Li | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645849 | Pruss et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645915 | Kranzler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5647836 | Blake, III et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649940 | Hart et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653373 | Green et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5658296 | Bates et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5660854 | Haynes et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662654 | Thompson | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5662658 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5674247 | Sohn | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681301 | Yang et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681310 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681352 | Clancy, III et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683378 | Christy | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5683418 | Luscombe et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690649 | Li | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690655 | Hart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690677 | Schmieding et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700266 | Harryman, II | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702215 | Li | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702397 | Goble et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702415 | Matthai et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707647 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5725529 | Nicholson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725557 | Gatturna et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728100 | Skiba | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733337 | Carr, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742943 | Chen | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5752963 | Allard et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5766221 | Benderev et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769864 | Kugel | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776184 | Tuch | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782834 | Lucey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782862 | Bonutti | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785640 | Kresch et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788710 | Bates et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813975 | Valenti | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814051 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814071 | McDevitt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814072 | Bonutti | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5816258 | Jervis | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824049 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824082 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5827291 | Fucci et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5836961 | Kieturakis | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5849004 | Bramlet | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851219 | Goble et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5860993 | Thompson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5868747 | Ochoa et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868789 | Huebner | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5871503 | Bartlett | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5916225 | Kugel | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935122 | Fourkas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935138 | McJames, II et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957932 | Bates et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5989180 | Norton | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6030337 | Grant et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056687 | Polyak et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6059801 | Samimi | May 2000 | A |
| 6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6090116 | D'Aversa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095969 | Karram et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099538 | Moses et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6099547 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6102921 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113611 | Allen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6135945 | Sultan | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6168801 | Heil, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6200261 | Deininger et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224616 | Kugel | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231581 | Shank et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245082 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6299607 | Osborn, III et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319262 | Bates et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319272 | Brenneman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6322492 | Kovac | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6328758 | Tornier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6355065 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387040 | Grant et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391060 | Ory et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402767 | Nash et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406234 | Frigg | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416462 | Tovey et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428562 | Bonutti | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6443886 | Deininger et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6447524 | Knodel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6451032 | Ory et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6461291 | Polyak et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494879 | Lennox et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6517566 | Hovland et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6530879 | Adamkiewicz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6589277 | Fabiani et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595911 | LoVuolo | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6596002 | Therin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6612977 | Staskin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6641525 | Rocheleau et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648921 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6692491 | Phan | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6702827 | Lund et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6802807 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6830052 | Carter | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7351196 | Goldmann et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 1030530 | Palmer | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 1066025 | Lieberknecht | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20010018549 | Scetbon | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020022841 | Kovac | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020028980 | Thierfelder et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020052654 | Darois et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020055748 | Gellman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020068948 | Stormby et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072694 | Snitkin et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077526 | Kammerer et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091298 | Landgrebe | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091373 | Berger | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099258 | Staskin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099259 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107430 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116025 | Haab | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138025 | Gellman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143234 | LoVuolo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151762 | Rocheleau et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151910 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156488 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161382 | Neisz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165566 | Ulmsten | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188169 | Kammerer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004395 | Therin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004580 | Sump et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009181 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030010929 | Priewe et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023135 | Ulmsten et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023136 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023137 | Gellman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023138 | Luscombe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028075 | Ulmsten et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030045774 | Staskin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050530 | Neisz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030062052 | Carter et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100954 | Schuldt-Hempe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030130670 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171644 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040015048 | Neisz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2198778 | Mar 1996 | CA |
| 2 305 815 | Aug 1974 | DE |
| 24 28 319 | Jan 1976 | DE |
| 25 32 242 | Feb 1977 | DE |
| 8203923 | Apr 1983 | DE |
| 32 06 846 | Sep 1983 | DE |
| 33 40 581 | Jun 1985 | DE |
| 35 21 717 | Dec 1985 | DE |
| 34 40 889 | Jun 1986 | DE |
| 86 04 065 | Jul 1986 | DE |
| 36 03 344 | Aug 1986 | DE |
| 87 07 515 | Sep 1987 | DE |
| 37 09 706 | Oct 1987 | DE |
| 87 07 516 | Oct 1987 | DE |
| 37 14 560 | Nov 1987 | DE |
| 37 04 094 | Aug 1988 | DE |
| 37 09 067 | Sep 1988 | DE |
| 37 39 254 | Jun 1989 | DE |
| 40 24 636 | Feb 1992 | DE |
| 41 31 176 | Apr 1993 | DE |
| 42 12 430 | Oct 1993 | DE |
| 20204669 | Sep 2003 | DE |
| 0 140 557 | May 1985 | EP |
| 0 153 831 | Sep 1985 | EP |
| 0 160 870 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 0 241 240 | Oct 1987 | EP |
| 0 281 763 | Sep 1988 | EP |
| 0 334 046 | Sep 1989 | EP |
| 0 337 918 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0 417 031 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0 437 063 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 0 437 063 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 0 450 608 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0 484 671 | May 1992 | EP |
| 0 538 984 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 0555 103 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0 558 993 | Sep 1993 | EP |
| 0 565 049 | Oct 1993 | EP |
| 0 571 057 | Nov 1993 | EP |
| 0 598 607 | May 1994 | EP |
| 0 599 772 | Jun 1994 | EP |
| 0 686 373 | Dec 1995 | EP |
| 0 854 691 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 778 749 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1 151 722 | Jul 2001 | EP |
| 1 159 921 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1 151 722 | Jan 2002 | EP |
| 1191902 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 2 432 861 | Mar 1980 | FR |
| 2 718 012 | Oct 1995 | FR |
| 2 739 016 | Mar 1997 | FR |
| 2 151 142 | Jul 1985 | GB |
| 2 214 814 | Sep 1989 | GB |
| 2 268 690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
| 2 353 220 | Feb 2001 | GB |
| 2 359 256 | Aug 2001 | GB |
| 61-9601 | Nov 1983 | JP |
| 63 095945 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 63-197443 | Aug 1988 | JP |
| 6-114067 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 503 271 | Mar 1996 | SE |
| 506 164 | Apr 1997 | SE |
| 990 220 | Jan 1983 | SU |
| 8801853 | Mar 1988 | WO |
| 8904674 | Jun 1989 | WO |
| 8910096 | Nov 1989 | WO |
| 9102493 | Mar 1991 | WO |
| 9205828 | Apr 1992 | WO |
| 9216152 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| 9221298 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| 9310715 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| 9310731 | Jun 1993 | WO |
| 9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| 9404080 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| 9405223 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| 9419029 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 9428799 | Dec 1994 | WO |
| 9505129 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| 9606567 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| 9625887 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| 9628100 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| 9706731 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| 9713465 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| 9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| 9741792 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 9743982 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 9812971 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| 9835632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO-9963907 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| 0066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| 0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| 0152750 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO-0228315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/092,872, filed Mar. 7, 2002, Gellman et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/093,498, filed Mar. 7, 2002, Gellman et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/093,398, filed Mar. 7, 2002, Gellman et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/093,371, filed Mar. 7, 2002, Gellman et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/094,352, filed Mar. 7, 2002, Gellman et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/093,424, filed Mar. 7, 2002, Gellman et al. |
| Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years of Proven Performance, Lasting freedom for your SUI patients, Gynecare TVT, 6 pages (2002). |
| The essence of a contemporary synthetic sling self-anchoring complete adjustability elastic, Safyre™ Autofixation System, Promedon, 4 pages (2002). |
| Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US02/07076, mailed on Oct. 17, 2002, 10 pages. |
| Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism after Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinent Women”, International Urogynecology Journal, 1996, vol. 7, pp. 133-137. |
| Fianu et al., “Absorbable Polyglactin Mesh for Retropubic Sling Operations in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence”, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Mar. 1985, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 45-50. |
| Henriksson et al., “A Urodynamic Comparison between Abdominal Urethrocystopexy and Vaginal Sling Plasty in Female Stress Incontinence”, Urologia Internationalis, 1978, vol. 33, No. 1-3, pp. 111-116. |
| Henriksson, et al., “A urodynamic evaluation of the effects of abdominal urethrocystopexy and vaginal sling urethroplasty in women with stress incontinence”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978, vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 77-82. |
| Iosif et al., “Urodynamic studies of women with prolapse and stress incontinence before and after surgical repair”, Zentralblatt für Gynäkologie, 1979, vol. 101, pp. 1433-1442. |
| Kersey, “The gauze hammock sling operation in the treatment of stress incontinence”, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oct. 1983, vol. 90, pp. 945-949. |
| Petros et al., “An Integral Theory and its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1993, Supplement No. 153. |
| Petros et al., “The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-Ligament”, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1990, vol. 69, Supplement 153, pp. 43-51. |
| Petros, “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, a Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female”, Aust. NZ Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1996, 36:4, pp. 453-461. |
| Petros et al., “The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1990, vol. 69, Supp. 153, pp. 41-42. |
| Petros et al., “Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates from within the Urethra, and Continence from Musculovaginal Closure”, Neurourology and Urodynamics, 1995, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 337-350. |
| Rezapour et al., “Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) in Woman with Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence—A Long-term Follow up”, International Urogynecology Journal, 2001, vol. 12 (Suppl 2), pp. S9-S11. |
| Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, 1996, vol. 7, pp. 81-86. |
| Ulmsten et al., “A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence”, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Apr. 1999, vol. 106, pp. 345-350. |
| Ulmsten et al., “Intravaginal Slingplasty”, Zentralbl Gynakol, 116 (1994), pp. 398-404. |
| Ulmsten et al., “Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1995, vol. 29, pp. 75-82. |
| Wang et al., “Tension-Free Vaginal Tape, A Minimally Invasive Solution to Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, May 1998, vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 429-434. |
| Amid, Parviz K., et al., “Experimental evaluation of a new composite mesh with the selective property of incorporation to the abdominal wall without adhering to the intestines”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 28, pp. 373-375 (1994). |
| Carachi, R., et al., “Collagen-Coated Vicryl Mesh: A New Bioprosthesis in Pediatric Surgical Practice”, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 30, No. 9 pp. 1302-1305 (1995). |
| Delorme, “La bandelette trans-obturatrice: un procede mini-invasif pour trailer l'incontinence urinair d'effort de la femme”, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313, 2001 (English summary therein). |
| Giesy et al., “Ureteral Instrumentation: A New System for Continued Access via a Safety Guidewire”, The Journal of Urology, No. 4, Part 2, p. 282A, Apr. 1988. |
| Haab et al., “Feasibility of Outpatient Percutaneous Bladder Neck Suspension Under Local Anesthesia,” Urology, vol. 50, pp. 585-587, 1997. |
| Jacquetin, B., “Utilisation du TVT dans la chirurgie de l'incontinence urinaire feminine”, J. Gynecol Obste Biol Reprod 2000, vol. 29, pp. 242-247 (English summary therein). |
| Norris et al., “Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach”, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, No. 3, Jun. 1996. |
| Petros, P., “An Integral Theory of Bladder Neck Opening, Closure and Urinary Incontinence int he Female”, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, XXIII World COngress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 1991. |
| Petros, “Medium-term Follow-up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation Indicates Minimal Deterioration of Urinary Continence With Time”, Aust. And N.Z. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 39, pp. 354-356, 1999. |
| Raz et al., “Fascial Sling to Correct Male Neurogenic Sphincter Incompetence: The McGuire/Raz Approach”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 139, pp. 528-531, 1988. |
| Raz et al., “Vaginal Wall Sling”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 141, No. 1, pp. 43-46, Jan. 1989. |
| Staskin, “Sling Surgery for the Treatment of Female Stress Incontinence”, Problems in Urology, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 106-122, Mar. 1991. |
| Staskin et al., “The Gore-tex sling procedure for female sphincteric incontinence: indications, technique, and results”, World Journal of Urology, vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 295-299, 1997. |
| Sussman et al., “The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension: Five Year Experience”, The Journal of Urology, vol. 145, p. 223A, 1993. |
| Ulmsten et al., “Connective Tissue Factors in the Aetiology of Female Pelvic Disorders”, Ann. Med., vol. 22, No. 6, p. 3, Dec. 1990. |
| Ulmsten et al., “Surgery for Female Urinary Incontinence”, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 456-462, 1992. |
| Ulmsten et al., “A Multicenter Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 210-213, 1998. |
| Ulmsten, “An Introduction to Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT)—A New Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 12, Suppl. 2, pp. S3-S4, 2001. |
| Ulmsten, “The Basic Understanding and Clinical Results of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Der Urologe [A] Apr. 2001, pp. 269-273. |
| The Tension-Free Solution to Female Incontinence, Gynecare TVT, 4 pages. |
| A Superior Approach to Tensionless Sling Placement, SPARC sling system for stress urinary incontinence, American Medical Systems, Inc., 4 pages (2001). |
| IVS Tunneller—A Universal Instrument for Intra-Vaginal Tape Placement, Tyco Healthcare UK Limited, 4 pages. |
| Falk et al., United States Statutory Invention Registration, Reg. No. H1028, Mar. 3, 1992, United States Patent Office, Washington D.C. |
| Adamiak et al., “The Efficacy and Safety of the Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Procedure Do Not Depend on the Method of Analgesia”, European Urology, 2002, vol. 42, pp. 29-33. |
| Agarwala et al., “Minimally invasive management of urinary incontinence”, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 429-433. |
| Araki et al., “The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties after Stamey Suspension of the Vesical Neck,” The Journal of Urology, Aug. 1990, vol. 144, pp. 319-323. |
| Bayer et al., “A New Approach to Primary Strengthening of Colostomy with Marlex® Mesh to Prevent Paracolostomy Hernia,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Dec. 1986, vol. 163, pp. 579-580. |
| Beck et al., “A 25-Year Experience with 519 Anterior Colporrhaphy Procedures,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dec. 1991, vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 1011-1018. |
| Blaivas, “Successful Pubovaginal Sling Surgery,” Contemporary Urology, Jul. 1993, pp. 40-63. |
| Blaivas, “Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence,” The Journal of Urology, Jun. 1991, vol. 145, pp. 1214-1218. |
| Benderev, “A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System,” The Journal of Urology, Dec. 1994, vol. 152, pp. 2316-2320. |
| Benderev, “A New Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension for the Outpatient Treatment of Stress urinary Incontinence,” The Journal of Urology, Apr. 1993, No. 4, videotape, V-40, p. 197A. |
| Benderev, “Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension,” Urology, Nov. 1992, vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 409-418. |
| Brenner, “Mesh Materials in Hernia Repair,” Expert Meeting on Hernia Surgery, St. Moritz, 1994. Basel Karger, 1995, pp. 172-179. |
| Cruikshank, “Reconstructive Procedures for the Gynecologic Surgeon,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feb. 1993, vol. 168, No. 2, pp. 469-475. |
| DeLancey, “Structural Support of the Urethra as it Relates to Stress urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jun. 1994, vol. 170, No. 6, pp. 1713-1723. |
| Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism after Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinent Women,” The International Urogynecology Journal, 1996, vol. 7, 133-137. |
| Forneret et al., “Cost-Effective Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension,” Urology, Apr. 1985, vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 365-367. |
| Gittes et al., “No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence,” The Journal of Urology, Sep. 1987, vol. 138, pp. 568-570. |
| Hancock et al., “Transpubic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Urinary Incontinence,” The Journal of Urology, May 1980, vol. 123, pp. 667-668. |
| Hoffman et al., “Transvestibular Retropubic Bladder Neck Suspension: A Pilot Study,” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Mar. 1995, vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 181-184. |
| Iglesia et al., “The Use of Mesh in Gynecologic Surgery,” International Urogynecology Journal, 1997, vol. 8, pp. 105-115. |
| Kovac et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, Apr. 1997, vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 624-627. |
| Leach et al., “Percutaneous Bladder Neck Suspension,” Urologic Clincs of North America, Aug. 1996, vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 511-516. |
| Leach, “Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension”, Urology, May 1988, vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 388-390. |
| Leach et al., “Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension after Previously Failed Anti-Incontinence Surgery,” Urology, Apr. 1984, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 359-362. |
| Mascio, et al., “Therapy of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women Using Mitek® GII Anchors,” The Mitek Brochure, 1993. |
| Mattox et al., “Modification of the Miya Hook in Vaginal Colpopexy,” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Oct. 1995, vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 681-683. |
| McGuire, “The Sling Procedure for Urinary Stress Incontinence” Profiles in Urology. |
| McKiel et al., Marshall-Marchetti Procedure: Modification, The Journal of Urology, 1966, vol. 96, pp. 737-739. |
| Mitchell, et al., “Hook Needle and Retractor for Posterior Urethroplasty,” British Journal of Urology, 1970, vol. 42, pp. 599-600. |
| Nativ et al., “Bladder Neck Suspension Using Bone Anchors for the Treatment of Female Stress Incontinence,” ASAIO Journal, 1997, pp. 204-208. |
| Nichols et al., “Identification of Pubourethral Ligaments and their Role in Transvaginal Surgical Correction of Stress Incontinence,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jan. 1973, vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 123-128. |
| Petros, “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, a Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female,” Aust. And N.Z. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996, vol. 4, pp. 453-461. |
| Petros, “Ambulatory Surgery for Urinary Incontinence and Vaginal Prolapse,” The Medical Journal of Australia, Jul. 1994, vol. 161, pp. 171-172. |
| Pereyra, “A Simplified Surgical Procedure for the Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women,” West. J. Surg. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jul.-Aug. 1959, pp. 223-226. |
| Raz, “Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress incontinence,” Urology, Jan. 1981, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 82-85. |
| Riachi et al., “Repeat Tension-Free Transvaginal Tape (TVT) Sling for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, 2002, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 133-135. |
| Richardson et al., “Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence Due to Paravaginal Fascial Defect,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mar. 1981, vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 357-362. |
| Richmond et al., “Modification of the Bankart Reconstruction with a Suture Anchor,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1991, vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 343-346. |
| Robertson et al., “Soft Tissue Fixation to Bone,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1986, vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 398-403. |
| Schaeffer et al., “Endoscopic Suspension of Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence,” Urology, May 1984, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 484-494. |
| Schatzker et al., “The Rationale of Operative Fracture Care,” 1987, pp. XIV-XV and 159. |
| Scheuer, “The Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension Procedure Using Mitek® GII Anchors,” The Mitek Brochure, 1993. |
| Spencer et al., “A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck with Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” The journal of Urology, Mar. 1987, vol. 137, pp. 411-415. |
| Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females,” Ann. Surg., Oct. 1980, vol. 192, No. 4, pp. 465-471. |
| Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck,” 1986, pp. 115-132. |
| Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Apr. 1973, vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 547-554. |
| Trockman et al., “Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension: 10-Year Mean Follow Up Using Outcomes Analysis in 125 Patents,” The Journal of Urology, Nov. 1995, vol. 154, pp. 1841-1847. |
| Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” International Urogynecology Journal, 1996, vol. 7, pp. 81-86. |
| Ulmsten et al., “Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence,” Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Mar. 1995, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 75-82. |
| Urken, “About Lifecell—Our Science,” Lifecell, 2001. |
| Vasavada et al., “Incisionless Pubovaginal Fascial Sling Using Transvaginal Bone Anchors for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence,” Digital Urology Journal, 2001. |
| Webster, “Female Urinary Incontinence,” Urologic Surgery, 1983, Third Edition, pp. 665-679. |
| Webster et al., “Voiding Dysfunction Follow-up Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management,” The Journal of Urology, Sep. 1990, vol. 144, pp. 670-673. |
| Winter, “Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women,” Urology, Oct. 1982, vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 408-411. |
| Zimmern et al., “A Prospective Evaluation of Four-Corner Bladder Neck Suspension for Grade II/III Cystocele Repair,” Neurology and Urodynamics, 1990, vol. 9, pp. 195 and 231. |
| Zimmern et al., “Transvaginal Closure of the Bladder Neck,” Seminars in Urology, Feb. 1986, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 30-32. |
| Zacharin, “Abdonimoperineal Urethral Suspension in the Management of Recurrent Stress Incontinence of Urine—A 15-Year Experience,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, Nov. 1983, vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 644-654. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020156489 A1 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60274843 | Mar 2001 | US | |
| 60286863 | Apr 2001 | US |