The present invention is related to processing systems and related methods of operation during poultry processing. More specifically, the present invention is directed to methods and related apparatus for increasing antimicrobial efficacy during poultry processing by reducing concentration gradients of antimicrobial agents within a processing tank.
Commercial poultry processing plants include variety of processing and handling steps that can allow for the retention, transportation and transfer of bacteria from carcass to carcass throughout the processing plant. Of particular concern are human pathogenic microorganisms and those whose metabolism result in rapid spoilage of meat. These microorganisms, brought into the plant in or on live carcasses, are disseminated throughout the plant as the post-kill carcasses are handled by processing personnel, touch briefly together during traverse of the shackle lines, or are dipped for periods of time in various aqueous solutions, like scald baths and chill water.
In response to the presence of bacteria, most processing plants have implemented various processes that expose poultry carcasses to desirable antimicrobial chemistries in order to reduce bacterial populations on the carcasses. While prior chemistries including sodium hypochlorite, trisodium phosphate, various organic acids, ozone, chlorine dioxide and acidified sodium provided benefits, these older technologies suffered from undesirable effects and limitations. Newer antimicrobial chemistries include the use of peroxycarboxylic acids (“PCA”), such as peroxyacetic acid (“PAA”). PAA is a highly efficacious antimicrobial that was originally used as a hard surface sanitizer, but has more recently been recognized as possessing superior antimicrobial intervention chemistries for poultry carcasses. PAA provides a broad spectrum of kill of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria while producing no undesirable chemical by-products as the PAA degrades.
PAA, which is also sometimes called peracetic acid, is a peroxycarboxylic acid and is a well known chemical for its strong oxidizing potential, has the molecular formula CH3COOOH, and has a molecular structure as follows:
An equilibrium PAA solution is produced from an equilibrium mixture of hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid and water (“equilibrium PAA solution”), which often uses an acid catalyst, e.g., sulfuric acid.
PAA has a pKA of about 8.4, such that about half the PAA is active (free) and about half is dissociated (bound) at a pH of about 8.4. For example, a 100 ppm solution of PAA at a pH of about 8.4 has about 50 ppm of active (free) PAA and about 50 ppm of peracetate ion, which is about 5 to about 10 times less effective than active PAA.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,676, which pertains to the application of equilibrium PAA solutions to fowl at an application concentration of about 100 ppm to about 2000 ppm, discloses such equilibrium solutions having a pH around 3.
Hydrogen peroxide is always present in excess in the natural equilibrium formulation of PAA solutions (and other equilibrium PCA solutions). Both the excess hydrogen peroxide and the PCA produced in the equilibrium PCA solution (such as PAA) are the sources of the oxidative chemistry that can create undesirable organoleptic effects on poultry skin and flesh, such as extremity darkening and skin bleaching. To mitigate the development of these undesirable effects, processing plants have reduced either concentrations of equilibrium PAA solutions (and other equilibrium PCA solutions) or restricted contact times.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,632,676 includes numerous examples of equilibrium PAA solutions and concludes that the examples show that effective sanitation occurs within a narrow peracetic acid concentration range. This patent also discusses bleaching that is apparent in unadjusted or NaOH adjusted PAA solutions compared to a solution adjusted to pH 5 with disodium phosphate. Published Patent Application No. 2012/0244261 also discusses providing a solution of PAA-containing water in a reservoir, measuring the pH in the reservoir, and then pH adjustment before processing with a source of alkali, pH determination in the reservoir during processing with pH adjustment as necessary during processing with a source of alkali to increase the weight of the processed poultry product, with the alkali adjusted PAA solutions having a pH between about 6 to about 9 in the processing reservoir before processing begins and during the processing.
Because of the importance of pH in driving the equilibrium equation to proper concentrations of PAA, it would be advantageous to improve upon the accuracy of pH measurement and consistency within the processing systems. It would also be advantageous to properly monitor and maintain the pH of PAA during processing to determine the proper active PAA compared to peracetate ions in the solution during processing. Still further, due to the amount of organic material in the processing tank, it would be advantageous to have accurate monitoring of the pH of the processing solution without having to routinely clean the pH probes that can be fouled by the organic material. Finally, it would be advantageous to improve upon existing processing systems so as to reduce concentration gradients across a processing tank, as well as to increase the antimicrobial efficacy of intervention processing solutions in processing tanks.
Various aspects of the present invention include both methods and related apparatus as well as systems for improving the efficacy of antimicrobial agents within processing tanks. Typically, methods, apparatus and systems of the present invention will involve the use of side streams to add appropriate antimicrobial agents into the processing tanks. Within these side streams, the antimicrobial agents will be added to a source solution and mixed to form a processing solution within the side stream. In some embodiments, the source solution is fresh water, while in some other embodiments the source solution may be a recycled, reclaimed and/or reused processing solution comprising one or more intervention solution components, such as a peroxycarboxylic acid, PAA, sodium hypochlorite or other processing chemistries. Depending upon the application, additional actions can be conducted on the processing solution within the side stream including any and or all of heating, for example, with heat exchangers, pumping, sampling, measuring, testing and/or pH adjusting the processing solution.
The invention may generally further comprise the processing solution having at least two distinct streams, for example, a first and second processing solution stream, wherein the at least two distinct streams will be introduced at two different and distinct locations within the processing tank. For instance, the first processing solution stream can be introduced proximate a carcass introduction location of the processing tank, while the second processing solution stream can be simultaneously introduced at a carcass removal location of the processing tank. In some embodiments, the first and second processing streams are provided by separate processing stream sources. For instance, the first processing stream may be a source of fresh water mixed with an intervention chemistry, while the second processing stream may be a recycled, reclaimed or reused processing source mixed with an intervention chemistry. In some other embodiments, a single processing solution is provided that can be divided into the first and second processing streams. In some embodiments, the processing solution can be divided into additional streams that can be introduced at various locations between the carcass introduction location and the carcass removal location of the processing tank. By simultaneously introducing at least two processing solution streams at different locations of the processing tank, large concentration gradients can be avoided with the processing tank such that each animal carcass is exposed to sufficient amounts of the antimicrobial agent across a length of the processing tank. Furthermore, reduced amounts of antimicrobial agent can be utilized as there is no longer the necessity to add excessive amounts of the antimicrobial agent at an upstream side of the processing tank to ensure that adequate levels of the antimicrobial agent are present at the downstream side. Various aspects of the present invention have been found to be especially useful when the processing tank comprises a poultry chiller tank for cooling poultry carcasses.
In another aspect, the present invention improves upon pH control and consistency within processing systems having an antimicrobial solution by adding a pH adjusting product and/or peroxycarboxylic acids, such as PAA, to the inlet piping system or to a tank in a side or ancillary system, such that the pH adjusting product is thoroughly mixed with the peroxycarboxylic acid prior to its introduction into a processing tank system, such as a chiller tank.
In some embodiments, the ancillary system can comprise one or more of the various piping of the processing tank system, for example, inlet flow piping, makeup flow piping, and tank recirculation piping. In such aspects, the processing water can have a pH between about 7 and 12 prior to addition of the peroxycarboxylic acid, in other aspects a pH between about 7.5 and 9. Once the peroxycarboxylic acid is added to the processing water, the solution is thoroughly mixed before pH determination and introduction of the processing solution into the processing tank.
In some other embodiments, the ancillary system can comprise one or more stand-alone tanks, for example, a mixing tank or similar reservoir, which supplies the processing solution having the desired pH to the processing tank system. Through the mixing of the processing water with the peroxycarboxylic acid and pH determination in an ancillary system, pH need only be measured once (in the ancillary system) as the velocity of the water in the ancillary system (either piping or stand-alone mixing tank) and the associated high Reynolds number, resulting in the processing solution having the desired pH between about 7 and about 12, in some other instances between about 7.5 and 11, and other instances between about 8.0 and 10.0, being thoroughly mixed prior to being introduced into the process tank. As all of the water entering the tank (either incoming, rinse, or recirculation) is at the same pH, consistent pH contacts each poultry carcass as the birds travel from a front end to a back end of the processing tank.
In some embodiments, the pH of the processing solution can also be determined in the overflow of the processing tank. As all of the water entering the tank travels from the front end to the back end of the processing tank, the overflow at the back end of the processing tank will provide an accurate pH determination after the carcasses travel the entire distance of the processing tank. In other words, determining the pH of the processing solution after it exits the processing tank will provide a more accurate determination of the pH than in the tank itself where processing has not been completed or organic material can build-up.
The above summary is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the subject matter hereof. The figures and the detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify various embodiments.
Subject matter hereof may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments in connection with the accompanying figures, in which:
While various embodiments are amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the claimed inventions to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the subject matter as defined by the claims.
Representative embodiments of the present invention provide methods and systems for improving the efficacy of antimicrobial agents in processing tanks by eliminating large concentration gradients across the length of the processing tank. In some embodiments, the invention can include consistently exposing poultry carcasses to a process solution having a similar concentration prior to introduction into a first end of a processing tank and upon exiting a second end of a processing tank. While the processing solution of the present invention is discussed in reference to a peroxycarboxylic acid, such as PAA, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the present invention is applicable to one or more antimicrobial components used in processing poultry.
In some embodiments, the invention can include consistently exposing poultry carcasses to process solution having similar pH prior to introduction into a first end of a processing tank and upon exiting a second end of a processing tank. Representative embodiments of the present invention utilize one or more ancillary systems for introducing a processing solution having at least one peroxycarboxylic acid in a processing water having a pH of about 7 to about 10 that is thoroughly mixed prior to introduction into the processing tank, such that the processing tank will not experience zones having different pH levels. In some embodiments, the ancillary system can comprise a piping inlet or piping recirculation loop in which the peroxycarboxylic acid is added to a processing water having a desired pH and thoroughly mixed prior to its introduction to the processing tank. In some embodiments, the ancillary system can comprise a storage tank or similar style reservoir into which the peroxycarboxylic acid is added to the processing water having a desired pH and mixed prior to its introduction to the processing tank. In some aspects, a pH adjustment component may need to be added to either the processing water or processing solution in the ancillary system to obtain the desired pH of the processing solution. Regardless of the design, the ancillary system will have high velocities and corresponding high Reynolds numbers such that the processing water, peroxycarboxylic acid, and any pH adjustment product is adequately mixed providing a processing solution having a desired pH and concentration of the peroxycarboxylic acid, such as PAA, prior to introduction into the processing tank. The present invention can further include measuring the pH within the ancillary system to accurately determine pH prior to introduction into the processing tank and without concern for fouling of a pH probe that is a common occurrence due to organic material from carcasses within the processing tank itself.
In a first embodiment as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Alternatively, ancillary system 114a can comprise a mixing tank or similar reservoir into which the pH adjustment product is added to a water supply and thoroughly mixed before being introduced into the inflow pipe 108. Similarly, ancillary system 114b can comprise a tank or similar reservoir of the intervention chemistry. In this way, the pH of the processing water 112a is precisely controlled and maintained as the inflow pipe 108 delivers the processing solution 112b into the first end 104 of the process tank 100. Since the processing solution 112b contains the processing water 112a at a desired pH thoroughly mixed with the intervention chemistry, the pH of the processing solution 112b will be consistent prior to introduction into the processing tank 101. As such, pH will remain consistent throughout the process tank 101 and there will not be localized areas of higher or lower pH within the process tank 101 as a result of mixing the components within the process tank 101 that would limit the effectiveness of the processing solution in rinsing, chilling or otherwise treating the poultry carcasses. Furthermore, pH can be monitored in either the inflow pipe 108 or the ancillary systems 112a, 112b such that a pH probe/sensor is not exposed to potential fouling within the process tank 101.
With reference to
In all of the illustrated embodiments, the chiller tank with red water loop processing system 200 comprises chiller tank 202, a heat exchanger 204 and an optional tempering box 206. In each of the embodiments, a make-up water stream 208 is supplied to a first end 210 of the chiller tank 202 while an overflow stream 212 is removed at a second end 214 of the chiller tank 202. In order to maintain temperature of a pH adjusted processing solution 216 within the chiller tank 202, a red water recirculation loop 218 supplies pH adjusted processing solution 216 from the chiller tank 202 to the heat exchanger 204, wherein the temperature of the pH adjusted processing solution is modified to the desired temperature and subsequently returned to the chiller tank 202.
With reference to
In a variation to the embodiment shown in
Finally in the embodiment illustrated in
In all of the variations of the chiller tank with red water loop processing system 200 described herein, a pH sensor/probe can be positioned in locations remote from the chiller tank 202. For example, the make-up water stream 208, the recirculation loop 218 and/or the bypass loop 230 can contain pH sensor/probes that are not exposed to fouling and/or contamination that can result from exposure to poultry contaminants within the chiller tank 202. Further, the pH sensor/probes can be located after the pH adjustment product is added to provide the processing water and/or after the intervention chemistry to provide the processing solution. In this way of the pH sensor/probes maintained outside of the chiller tank, maintenance is eliminated or otherwise reduced and operators can have a higher level of confidence that pH of the processing solution and concentration of intervention chemistry is at the desired levels before being introduced into the chiller tank 202.
In each of the embodiments shown in
In some aspects, the processing solution in the inlet or red water recirculation loop prior to introduction into the tank has a pH above 7.0 and below 10, in other aspects between about 7.5 and about 9.5 and in other aspects between about 7.2 and 8.6.
In certain aspects, the processing solution has a concentration of peroxycarboxylic acid from about 1 ppm to about 5000 ppm, preferably from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm, preferably from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm, and more preferably from about 15 ppm to about 100 ppm. In some aspects, the concentration of active peroxycarboxylic acid in the processing solution is from about 1 ppm to about 5000 ppm, preferably from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm, preferably from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm, and more preferably from about 15 ppm to about 100 ppm. In some other aspects, the concentration of active peroxycarboxylic acid and active peroxycarboxylic acid ion in the processing solution is from about 1 ppm to about 5000 ppm, preferably from about 5 ppm to about 1000 ppm, preferably from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm, and more preferably from about 15 ppm to about 100 ppm. In some aspects, the concentration of the PAA in the processing solution is between about 15 ppm and about 100 ppm, preferably between about 15 ppm and about 75 ppm, and in some other aspects between about 20 ppm and 50 ppm.
In certain aspects, the poultry tank design of the present invention having at least a first and a second processing stream is capable of maintaining less than about a 10 ppm concentration gradient across the processing length of a processing tank, in some aspects less than about an 8 ppm concentration gradient, less than about 6 ppm concentration gradient, less than about 5 ppm concentration gradient, less than about 4 ppm concentration gradient, and in other aspects less than about a 3 ppm concentration gradient across the processing length of the processing tank. In certain aspects, the concentration gradient across the processing length of the processing tank of the present invention is between about 1 ppm and about 10 ppm, between about 2 ppm and 8 ppm, and in some other aspects between about 3 ppm and 5 ppm.
Testing
In order to evaluate the efficacy of the present invention, a test was conducted to compare the performance of a conventional poultry chiller tank as represented by
With the conventional poultry chiller tank as represented by
As can be seen in the sample measurements, a significant length of poultry chiller tank 300 experienced concentrations of PAA significantly below the desired level of 30 ppm. More specifically, poultry carcasses near that carcass removal end 308 were exposed to chiller tank solution having half of the desired concentration of PAA. The carcass introduction end 304 experienced a slightly higher level of PAA due to the injection of the concentrated antimicrobial solution 302 as well as PAA carryover on poultry carcasses from the prior processing step.
With the poultry chiller tank design of the present invention as show in
As can be seen in the sample measurements, the poultry chiller tank design of the present invention had a much lower concentration gradient across the length of the poultry chiller tank 300 with the chiller tank solution 306 at the chiller tank midpoint 310 and carcass removal end 308 being much closer to the desired concentration level of 30 ppm. As measured, the poultry chiller tank design of the present invention is capable of maintaining plus or minus 3 ppm of PAA within the chiller tank solution 306 across the length of the poultry chiller tank 300.
While the design illustrated in 5B utilized introduction of only a first processing solution 326 and a second processing solution 328, processing solution 324 can be further divided into additional processing solution streams that can be introduced at additional locations within the poultry chiller tank 300. For example, processing solution 324 could be further divided into a third processing solution also having a PAA concentration of 30 ppm and said third processing solution could be introduced, for example, at the chiller tank midpoint 310.
Another representative embodiment of a poultry chiller tank 400 is illustrated generally in
In some aspects, the pH adjustment product is an alkalizing agent approved for direct food contact. In some aspects, the alkalizing agent is chosen from alkali metals and alkali earth metals, including sodium hydroxide and/or potassium hydroxide and/or the sodium and/or potassium salts of carbonic acid and/or phosphoric acid and/or silicic acid and/or other alkaline chemistries.
Various embodiments of systems, devices, and methods have been described herein. These embodiments are given only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed inventions. It should be appreciated, moreover, that the various features of the embodiments that have been described may be combined in various ways to produce numerous additional embodiments. Moreover, while various materials, dimensions, shapes, configurations and locations, etc. have been described for use with disclosed embodiments, others besides those disclosed may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the claimed inventions.
The present continuation application claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/676,622 filed Aug. 14, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,350,640 issued Jun. 7, 2022, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/374,468 filed Aug. 12, 2016 and entitled “METHODS AND RELATED APPARATUS FOR MEASURING AND ADJUSTING PROCESSING SOLUTION pH FOR POULTRY PROCESSING”, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2347434 | Reichert et al. | Apr 1944 | A |
2377038 | Reichert et al. | May 1945 | A |
2512640 | Greenspan et al. | Jun 1950 | A |
2966415 | Rinehart et al. | Dec 1960 | A |
3104170 | Mahon et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3104978 | Elder | Sep 1963 | A |
3122417 | Blaser et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
3234140 | Irani et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3689283 | May et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
4675947 | Clatfelter et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
5069922 | Brotsky et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5139788 | Schmidt | Aug 1992 | A |
5143739 | Bender et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5200189 | Oakes et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208057 | Greenley | May 1993 | A |
5234703 | Guthery | Aug 1993 | A |
5283073 | Bender et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5364650 | Guthery | Nov 1994 | A |
5435808 | Holzhauer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5462713 | Schlitzer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5489434 | Oakes et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5567444 | Hei et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5597791 | Richards et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5632676 | Kurschner et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635231 | Bender et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5674538 | Lokkesmoe et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5718910 | Oakes et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720983 | Malone | Feb 1998 | A |
5863244 | Mansfield et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5965033 | Huss et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008405 | Gray et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010729 | Gutzmann et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6103286 | Gutzmann | Aug 2000 | A |
6113963 | Gutzmann et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6183807 | Gutzmann et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6284719 | Simms | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6342528 | McKenzie et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6455086 | Trinh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6514556 | Hilgren et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518419 | Van Der Lugt et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527872 | Fricker et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534075 | Hei et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6545047 | Gutzmann et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558620 | Sanford et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582961 | Moon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6605253 | Perkins | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6627593 | Hei et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627657 | Hilgren et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6964788 | Phebus et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7077967 | Perkins et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7387736 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7470655 | Biering et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7498051 | Man | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7754670 | Lange et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767240 | Howarth | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7832360 | Hilgren et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7887641 | Man et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8020520 | Hilgren et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8029693 | Dada et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8030351 | Gutzmann et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043650 | Gutzmann et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8057812 | Man et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8128976 | Man et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8246758 | Man et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8372461 | Bullard et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8877254 | Li et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8916510 | Gutzmann et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9414609 | Bullard | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9497964 | Dagher et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
10912321 | Harvey et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10974211 | Beason et al. | Apr 2021 | B1 |
11350640 | Bullard et al. | Jun 2022 | B1 |
20010044401 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020072627 | Chandalia et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083549 | Dieterman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030047087 | Phebus et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030148727 | Hilgren et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030180385 | Martinelli et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199583 | Gutzmann et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200997 | Gill et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211169 | Tabasso | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050209120 | Reinhardt et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245416 | Veening et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060113506 | Man et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060225439 | Morris, III | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060286227 | Terry | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025897 | Rheingans et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070244261 | Fukui et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070269563 | Mixon et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070292580 | Gutzmann et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090043123 | Copenhafer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090143481 | Man et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145859 | Man et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090282847 | Bullard | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090311134 | Iwashita et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324790 | Hilgren et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100021557 | Li et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100075883 | Geret et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100092574 | Sweeny | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100108942 | Man et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100196503 | Heisig et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100227000 | Ames et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100323037 | Curry et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110027383 | Hilgren et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110135534 | Bates et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110177145 | Erkenbrecher, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110220155 | Man et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110274766 | Allen et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110305805 | Gutzmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311691 | Gutzmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120165407 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120244261 | Harvey | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245228 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120322872 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130153516 | Bullard | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130251819 | Knueven et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2569025 | Jun 2008 | CA |
84296 | Jan 1958 | DK |
0564250 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0564250 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0550137 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0985349 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1199931 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1435203 | Jul 2004 | EP |
947688 | Jan 1964 | GB |
1456592 | Nov 1976 | GB |
2289676 | Nov 1995 | GB |
H08165298 | Jun 1996 | JP |
WO9406294 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO9421122 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO9424869 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO9742984 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO9900025 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO0105255 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0237972 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0254866 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO02060280 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO03092919 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2006015626 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2007092087 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2009027857 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009156972 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO2012037294 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/676,622 (now U.S. Pat. No. 11,350,640) filed Aug. 14, 2017, inventors Bullard et al. |
Bauermeister, L.J. et al., “The Microbial and Quality Properties of Poultry Carcasses treated with Peracetic Acid as Antimicrobial Treatment”, Department of Poultry Science. © 2008 Poultry Science Association, Inc. Accepted Jun. 13, 2008. 9 pages. |
Li, Junzhong et al., File History of U.S. Appl. No. 61/427,952, filed Dec. 29, 2010, titled “In Situ Generation of Peroxycarboxylic Acids at Alkaline pH, and Methods of Use Thereof”. |
Alvarado, C. et al., “Marination to Improve Functional Properties and Safety of Poultry Meat”, Department of Animal and Food Sciences. © 2007 Poultry Science Association, Inc. 15 pages. |
Yuan, Z. et al., “Kinetics of Peracetic Acid Decomposition Part 1: Spontaneous Decomposition at Typical Pulp Bleaching Conditions”, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 75. Feb. 1997. 6 pages. |
Baldry, M.G.C. et al., “The Activity of Peracetic Acid in Sewage Indicator Bacteria and Viruses”, Wat.Sci. Tech, vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 353-357. © 1991. |
Ercken,D. et al.., “Effects of Peracetic Acid and Monochloramine on the Inactivation o fNaegleria Lovaniensis”, Water Science Technology. vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 167-171. © 2003. |
Schmidt, Ronald H.,“Basic Elements of Equipment Cleaning and Sanitizing in Food Processing and Handling Operations”, University of Florida. 11 pages. Publication FS14, Dec. 12, 2018. |
Artés, F. et al., “Improved Strategies for Keeping Overall Quality of Fresh-cut Produce”, Proc. IC on Qual. Manag. Fresh Cut Produce. 2007, pp. 245-258. |
Chandra, Sofia Santi, “Effects of Low-dose Gamma Irradiation, Chlorine, and Peroxyacetic Acid (PAA) on Fresh Sliced Radish”, A Research Project, Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Chapman University. Aug. 2004. 56 pages. |
Ernst, C. et al., “Efficacy of Amphoteric Surfactant-and Peracetic Acid-Based Disinfectants on Spores of Bacillus cereus In Vitro and on Food Premises of the German Armed Forces”, Journal of Food Protection. vol. 69, No. 7, pp. 1605-1610. 2006. |
Rodrigues, Laura Beatriz, et al., “Quantification of Biofilm Production on Polystyrene by Listeria, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From a Poultry Slaughterhouse”, Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (2010) 41: 1082-1085. |
Sánchez-Ruiz, Concepción, et al., “An Evaluation of the Efficiency and Impact of Ray Wastewater Disinfection with Peracetic Acid Prior to Ocean Discharge”, Wat. Sci. Tech. vol. 32, No. 7 pp. 159-166. 1995. |
Trachoo, Nathanon, “Survival of Campylobacter jejuni in Biofilms Isolated from the Water System of a Chicken House”, A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. Athens, Georgia. 2001. |
Vij, Shilpa, “New Sanitation Technologies”, pp. 125-128 from Lecture Compendium: Advances in Cleaning and Sanitation in Food Industry, The Seventeenth Short Course, Centre of Advanced Studies, Division of Dairy Technology, National Dairy Research Institute, Mar. 3-23, 2004. |
Bauermesiter, Laura J., et al., “Validating the Efficacy of Peracetic Acid Mixture as an Antimicrobial of Poultry Chillers”, J. Food. Prot., vol. 71, No. 6. pp. 1119-1122. 2008. |
Howarth, Jon, “PERASAN® Efficacy Against Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli in 15% Salt Brine Solutions of 40° F.”, EnviroTech. Feb. 15, 2005.4 pages. |
Baert, Leen, et al., “Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite and Peroxyacetic Acid To Reduce Murine Norovirus 1, B40-8, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Shredded Iceberg Lettuce and in Residual Wash Water”, Journal of Food Protection. vol. 27, No. 5 (2009). pp. 1047-1054. |
Baldry, M.G.C., “The Bactericidal, Fungicidal and Sporicidal Properties of Hydrogen Peroxide and Peracetic Acid”, Journal of Applied Bacteriology. pp. 417-423. 1983. |
Burfoot, Dean, et al., “Reducing Microbial Counts on Chicken and Turkey Carcasses Using Lactic Acid”, ScienceDirect. Food Control 22 (2011) pp. 1729-1735,. |
Dickens, J.A., et al., “Effects of Acetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide Application During Defeathering on the Microbiological Quality of Broiler Carcasses Prior to Evisceration”, Poultry Science 76:657-660 (1997). |
Dickens, J.A., et al., “The Effects of Extended Chilling Times with Acetic Acid on the Temperature and Microbiological Quality of Processed Poultry Carcasses”, Processing and Products. Poultry Science 74:1044-1048 (1995). |
Dorsa, Warren J., et al., “Long-Term Bacterial Profile of Refrigerated Ground Beef Made from Carcass Tissue, Experimentally Contaminated with Pathogens and Spoilage Bacteria after Hot Water Alkaline, or Organic Acid Washes”, Journal of Food Protection, vol. 61, No. 12 pp. 1615-1622 (1998). |
foodsmatter.com. www.foodsmatter.com/miscellaneous_articles/misc_articles/research/bleach_and_vinegar.html, “Improving Bleach's Bug-killing Potential”. First published in Jul. 2009. |
Gill, C.O., et al., “Effects of Peroxyacetic Acid, Acidified Sodium Chlorite or Lactic Acid Solutions on the Microflora of Chilled Beef Carcasses”, International Journal of Food Microbiology 91 (2004) pp. 43-50,. |
Kemp, G. Kere, et al., “Acidified Sodium Chlorite Antimicrobial Treatment of Boiler Carcasses”, Journal of Food Protection. vol. 63, No. 8 (2000) pp. 1087-1092. |
Lillard, H.S., “Effect of Trisodium Phosphate of Salmonellae Attached to Chicken Skin”, Journal of Food Protection. vol. 57, No. 6. pp. 465-469. Jun. 1994. |
Peracetic Acid Technical Report, Peracetic Acid Processing, CAS No. 79-21-0, NOSB TAP Review Compiled by OMRI, Last updated Nov. 3, 2000 (7 pages). |
Zeco, LLC, d/b/a Zee Company v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc., Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgement In the United States Direct Court Eastern Direct of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Case No. 1:21-cv-00079-CEA-CHS, Document 95, filed Aug. 30, 2022. 21 pages. |
Simpson, Catherine A. et al. “Antimicrobial Ingredients” Chapter 14 from Ingredients in Meat Products, pp. 301-377 (2009). |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,210 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,974,211) filed Feb. 17, 2017, inventors Beason et al. |
Labadie, J., et al., “Development of a New Technique of Obtaining Axenic Meat”, European J. Appl. Microbiol. (1977), 4, 67-73. |
Joeseph, Robin L.(editor), James, Christian, et al., “Meat Decontamination—The State of the Art”, University of Bristol (1997), pp. 1,8-9, 12, 33-35, 38, 43, 64-91, 98-99, and 104-105. |
Harris, D., et al., “Microbiological and Organoleptic Characteristics of Beef Trim and Gound Beef Treated with Acetic Acid, Latic Acid, Acidified Sodium Chlorite, or Sterile Water in a Simulated Commercial Processing Environment to Reduce Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and Salmonella”, Meat Science, 90 (2012) pp. 783-788. |
Gusev, A. A., et al., “Peracetic Acid for Salmonella Decontamination of Poultry Carcasses”, Veterinary Disease Control Review (2007), UDC 819.614.31:858/838, 4 pages. |
Dorn, P., et al., Examination of Salmonella Decontamination of Broiler Carcasses (1988), and English Translation, 28 pages. |
Carciofi, Bruno A.M., et al., “Water Uptake by Poultry Carcasses During Cooling by Water Immersion”, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 46, No. 5 (2007) pp. 444-450. |
Bell, Kristen Y., et al., “Reduction of Foodborne Micro-organisms on Beef Carcass Tissue Using Acetic Acid, Sodium Bicarbonate, and Hydrogen Peroxide Spray Washes”, Food Microbiology (1997), 14, pp. 439-448. |
Mohan, Anand, et al., “Role of Peroxyacetic Acid, Octanoic Acid, Malic Acid, and Potassium Lactate on the Microbiological and Instrumental Color Characteristics of Ground Beef”, J. Food Science. vol. 77, No. 4, (2012), pp, M188-M193. |
nationalchickencouncil.org, “Food Safety and Inspection in the U.S. Broiler Chicken Industry”, (2013). http:///www.nationalchickencouncil.org/industry-issues/food-safety/, 2 pages. |
Quilo, S.A., et al., Microbial, Instrumental Color and Sensory Characteristics of Inoculated Ground Beef Produced Using Potassium Lactate, Sodium Metasilicate or Peroxyacetic Acid as Multiple Antimicrobial Interventions, Meat Science 84 (2010) pp. 470-476. |
Russell, Scott M., “Solving The Yield/Pathogen Reduction Dilemma”, Watt Poultry USA, Oct. 2007, pp. 30-34. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 17/676,622 (now U.S. Pat. No. 11,350,640) filed Aug. 14, 2017, inventors Bullard et al. |
Bottemiller, Helena, “Russia Agrees to Lift Ban on U.S. Poultry Imports”, FSN, Food Safety News., Jun. 25, 2010. |
Young, L.L., et al., “Moisture Retention by Water and Air-Chilled Chicken Broilers During Processing and Cutup Operations”, Poultry Science Association, Inc., (2004), pp. 119-122. |
May, K.N., et al., “Effect of Phosphate Treatment of Carcass-Weight Changes and Organoleptic Quality of Cup-Up-Chicken”, University of Georgia and Market Quality Research Division. (1962) pp. 24-32. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62374468 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15676622 | Aug 2017 | US |
Child | 17805263 | US |