System for independent powering of a computer system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6202160
  • Patent Number
    6,202,160
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 1, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 13, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A fault tolerant system for independent powering of diagnostic processes through a remote interface by use of a serial (local) or modem (dial-in) gateway. A server connects to a local or remote facility which includes a client computer. If the internal server power is off, the remote interface provides independent external power to portions of the server to facilitate reading of the server internal status or to remotely power up the server from the client computer. The remote interface provides bias power to a chassis microcontroller and a system recorder comprising a non-volatile memory and a microcontroller. The management of the server devices is directed by a network of microcontrollers without intervention of the server operating system software.
Description




COPYRIGHT RIGHTS




A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.




INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF COMMONLY OWNED APPLICATIONS




The following U.S. pat. application, commonly owned and filed Oct. 1, 1997, are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety be reference thereto:


















U.S. patent








application






Title




Ser. No.




Status











“System Architecture for




08/942,160




PENDING






Remote Access and Control of






Environmental Management”






“Method of Remote Access




08/942,215




PENDING






and Control of Environmental






Management”






“System for Independent




08/942,410




PENDING






Powering of Diagnostic






Processes on a Computer






System”






“Diagnostic and Managing




08/942,402




PENDING






Distributed Processor System”






“Method for Managing a




08/942,448




PENDING






Distributed Processor System”






“System for Mapping




08/942,222




PENDING






Environmental Resources to






Memory for Program Access”






“Method for Mapping




08/942,214




PENDING






Environmental Resources to






Memory for Program Access”






“Hot Add of Devices




08/942,309




PENDING






Software Architecture”






“Method for The Hot Add of




08/942,306




PENDING






Devices”






“Hot Swap of Devices




08/942,311




PENDING






Software Architecture”






“Method for The Hot Swap of




08/942,457




PENDING






Devices”






“Method for the Hot Add of a




08/943,072




ISSUED 4/6/99






Network Adapter on a System





(U.S. Pat. No. 5,892,928)






Including a Dynamically






Loaded Adapter Driver”






“Method for the Hot Add of a




08/942,069




PENDING






Mass Storage Adapter on a






System Including a Statically






Loaded Adapter Driver”






“Method for the Hot Add of a




08/942,465




PENDING






Network Adapter on a System






Including a Statically Loaded






Adapter Driver”






“Method for the Hot Add of a




08/962,963




PENDING






Mass Storage Adapter on a






System Including a






Dynamically Loaded Adapter






Driver”






“Method for the Hot Swap of




08/943,078




ISSUED 3/30/99






a Network Adapter on a





(U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,965)






System Including a






Dynamically Loaded Adapter






Driver”






“Method for the Hot Swap of




08/942,336




PENDING






a Mass Storage Adapter on a






System Including a Statically






Loaded Adapter Driver”






“Method for the Hot Swap of




08/942,459




PENDING






a Network Adapter on a






System Including a






Statically Loaded Adapter






Driver”






“Method for the Hot Swap of




08/942,458




PENDING






a Mass Storage Adapter on a






System Including a






Dynamically Loaded Adapter






Driver”






“Method of Performing an




08/942,463




ISSUED 3/07/00






Extensive Diagnostic Test in





(U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,420)






Conjunction with a BIOS Test






Routine”






“Apparatus for Performing an




08/942,163




ISSUED 12/28/99






Extensive Diagnostic Test in





(U.S. Pat. No. 6,009,541)






Conjunction with a BIOS Test






Routine”






“Configuration Management




08/941,268




PENDING






Method for Hot Adding and






Hot Replacing Devices”






“Configuration Management




08/942,408




PENDING






System for Hot Adding and






Hot Replacing Devices”






“Apparatus for Interfacing




08/942,382




PENDING






Buses”






“Method for Interfacing




08/942,413




ISSUED 11/16/99






Buses”





(U.S. Pat. No. 5,987,554)






“Computer Fan Speed Control




08/942,447




ISSUED 11/23/99






Device”





(U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,582)






“Computer Fan Speed Control




08/942,216




ISSUED 10/05/99






Method”





(U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,933)






“System for Powering Up and




08/943,076




PENDING






Powering Down a Server”






“Method of Powering Up and




08/943,077




PENDING






Powering Down a Server”






“System for Resetting a




08/942,333




ISSUED 5/16/00






Server”





(U.S. Pat. No. 6,065,053)






“Method of Resetting a




08/942,405




PENDING






Server”






“System for Displaying




08/942,070




PENDING






Flight Recorder”






“Method of Displaying




08/942,068




PENDING






Flight Recorder”






“Synchronous Communication




08/943,355




PENDING






Interface”






“Synchronous Communication




08/942,004




ISSUED 5/30/00






Emulation”





(U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,661)






“Software System Facilitating




08/942,317




PENDING






the Replacement or Insertion






of Devices in a Computer






System”






“Method for Facilitating the




08/942,316




PENDING






Replacement or Insertion of






Devices in a Computer






System”






“System Management




08/943,357




PENDING






Graphical User Interface”






“Display of System




08/942,195




ISSUED 4/4/00






Information”





(U.S. Pat. No. 6,046,742)






“Data Management System




08/942,129




PENDING






Supporting Hot Plug






Operations on a Computer”






“Data Management Method




08/942,124




ISSUED 5/2/00






Supporting Hot Plug





(U.S. Pat. No. 6,058,445)






Operations on a Computer”






“Alert Configurator and




08/942,005




PENDING






Manager”






“Managing Computer System




08/943,356




PENDING






Alerts”






“Computer Fan Speed Control




08/940,301




PENDING






System”






“Computer Fan Speed Control




08/941,267




PENDING






System Method”






“Black Box Recorder for




08/942,381




PENDING






Information System Events”






“Method of Recording




08/942,164




PENDING






Information System Events”






“Method for Automatically




08/942,168




PENDING






Reporting a System Failure in






a Server”






“System for Automatically




08/942,384




PENDING






Reporting a System Failure in






a Server”






“Expansion of PCI Bus




08/942,404




PENDING






Loading Capacity”






“Method for Expanding PCI




08/942,223




PENDING






Bus Loading Capacity”






“System for Displaying




08/942,347




PENDING






System Status”






“Method of Displaying




08/942,071




PENDING






System Status”






“Fault Tolerant Computer




08/942,194




PENDING






System”






“Method for Hot Swapping




08/943,044




PENDING






of Network Components”






“A Method for




08/942,221




PENDING






Communicating a Software






Generated Pulse Waveform






Between Two Servers in a






Network”






“A System for




08/942,409




PENDING






Communicating a Software






Generated Pulse Waveform






Between Two Servers in a






Network”






“Method for Clustering




08/942,318




PENDING






Software Applications”






“System for Clustering




08/942,411




PENDING






Software Applications”






“Method for Automatically




08/942,319




PENDING






Configuring a Server after Hot






Add of a Device”






“System for Automatically




08/942,331




PENDING






Configuring a Server after Hot






Add of a Device”






“Method of Automatically




08/942,412




PENDING






Configuring and Formatting a






Computer System and






Installing Software”






“System for Automatically




08/941,955




PENDING






Configuring and Formatting a






Computer System and






Installing Software”






“Determining Slot Numbers




08/942,462




PENDING






in a Computer”






“System for Detecting Errors




08/942,169




PENDING






in a Network”






“Method of Detecting Errors




08/940,302




PENDING






in a Network”






“System for Detecting




08/942,407




PENDING






Network Errors”






“Method of Detecting




08/942,573




PENDING






Network Errors”














BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to fault tolerant computer systems. More specifically, the invention is directed to a system for providing remote access and control of server environmental management.




2. Description of the Related Technology




As enterprise-class servers become more powerful and more capable, they are also becoming increasingly sophisticated and complex. For many companies, these changes lead to concerns over server reliability and manageability, particularly in light of the increasingly critical role of server-based applications. While in the past many systems administrators were comfortable with all of the various components that made up a standards-based network server, today's generation of servers can appear as an incomprehensible, unmanageable black box. Without visibility into the underlying behavior of the system, the administrator must “fly blind.” Too often the only indicators the network manager has on the relative health of a particular server is whether or not it is running.




It is well-acknowledged that there is a lack of reliability and availability of most standards-based servers. Server downtime, resulting either from hardware or software faults or from regular maintenance, continues to be a significant problem. By one estimate, the cost of downtime in mission critical environments has risen to an annual total of $4.0 billion for U.S. businesses, with the average downtime event resulting in a $140 thousand loss in the retail industry and a $450 thousand loss in the securities industry. It has been reported that companies lose as much as $250 thousand in employee productivity for every 1% of computer downtime. With emerging Internet, intranet and collaborative applications taking on more essential business roles every day, the cost of network server downtime will continue to spiral upward.




While hardware fault tolerance is an important element of an overall high availability architecture, it is only one piece of the puzzle. Studies show that a significant percentage of network server downtime is caused by transient faults in the I/O subsystem. These faults may be due, for example, to the device driver, the adapter card firmware, or hardware which does not properly handle concurrent errors, and often causes servers to crash or hang. The result is hours of downtime per failure, while a system administrator discovers the failure takes some action, and manually reboots the server. In many cases, data volumes on hard disk drives become corrupt and must be repaired when the volume is mounted. A dismount-and-mount cycle may result from the lack of “hot pluggability” in current standards-based servers. Diagnosing intermittent errors can be a frustrating and time-consuming process. For a system to deliver consistently high availability, it must be resilient to these types of faults. Accurate and available information about such faults is central to diagnosing the underlying problems and taking corrective action.




Modern fault tolerant systems have the functionality to provide the ambient temperature of a storage device enclosure and the operational status of other components such as the cooling fans and power supply. However, a limitation of these server systems is that they do not contain self-managing processes to correct malfunctions. Also, if a malfunction occurs in a typical server, it relies on the operating system software to report, record and manage recovery of the fault. However, many types of faults will prevent such software from carrying out these tasks. For example, a disk drive failure can prevent recording of the fault in a log file on that disk drive. If the system error caused the system to power down, then the system administrator would never know the source of the error.




Traditional systems are lacking in detail and sophistication when notifing system administrators of system malfunctions. System administrators are in need of a graphical user interface for monitoring the health of a network of servers. Administrators need a simple point-and-click interface to evaluate the health of each server in the network. In addition, existing fault tolerant servers rely upon operating system maintained logs for error recording. These systems are not capable of maintaining information when the operating system is inoperable due to a system malfunction. Existing systems do not have a system log for maintaining information when the main computational processors are inoperable or the operating system has crashed.




Another limitation of the typical fault tolerant system is that the control logic for the diagnostic system is associated with a particular processor. Thus, if the environmental control processor malfunctioned, then all diagnostic activity on the computer would cease. In traditional systems, if a controller dedicated to the fan system failed, then all fan activity could cease resulting in overheating and ultimate failure of the server. What is desired is a way to obtain diagnostic information when the server OS is not operational or even when main power to the server is down.




Existing fault tolerant systems also lack the power to remotely control a particular server, such as powering up and down, resetting, reading system status, displaying flight recorder and so forth. Such control of the server is desired even when the server power is down. For example, if the operating system on the remote machine failed, then a system administrator would have to physically go to the remote machine to re-boot the malfunctioning machine before any system information could be obtained or diagnostics could be started.




Therefore, a need exists for improvements in server management which will result in greater reliability and dependability of operation. Server users are in need of a management system by which the users can accurately gauge the health of their system. Users need a high availability system that must not only be resilient to faults, but must allow for maintenance, modification, and growth—without downtime. System users must be able to replace failed components, and add new functionality, such as new network interfaces, disk interface cards and storage, without impacting existing users. As system demands grow, organizations must frequently expand, or scale, their computing infrastructure, adding new processing power, memory, storage and I/O capacity. With demand for 24-hour access to critical, server-based information resources, planned system downtime for system service or expansion has become unacceptable.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The inventive remote access system provides system administrators with new levels of client/server system availability and management. It gives system administrators and network managers a comprehensive view into the underlying health of the server—in real time, whether on-site or off-site. In the event of a failure, the invention enables the administrator to learn why the system failed, why the system was unable to boot, and to control certain functions of the server from a remote station.




One embodiment of the present invention is a system for independent powering of a first computer, comprising a first computer storing status information; a first computer power supply that supplies power to the first computer; a remote interface power supply that is independent from the first computer power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from the remote interface power supply and is capable of providing independent power to portions of the first computer to facilitate reading of the status information.




Another embodiment of the present invention is a system for independent powering of a first computer, comprising a first computer storing status information; a first computer power supply that supplies power to the first computer; a remote interface power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from the remote interface power supply and is capable of providing power to at least a portion of the first computer.




Yet another embodiment of the present invention is a system for independent powering of a power-on process on a computer comprising a first computer having a first computer power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from a power supply that is independent from the first computer power supply and provides independent power to portions of the first computer to facilitate remotely powering up the first computer if the first computer power supply is operating below a predetermined threshold.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a top level block diagram of microcontroller network components utilized by an embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram of the server portion of the microcontroller network shown in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote interface board (RIB) that is part of the microcontroller network shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

.





FIG. 4

is a diagram of one embodiment of a serial protocol message formats utilized by the RIB shown in FIG.


3


.





FIG. 5

is a schematic diagram of a bias power portion of the RIB shown in FIG.


3


.





FIG. 6

is a schematic diagram of a bias power portion of the server system board in the server system of FIG.


2


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The following detailed description presents a description of certain specific embodiments of the present invention. However, the present invention can be embodied in a multitude of different ways as defined and covered by the claims. In this description, reference is made to the drawings wherein like parts are designated with like numerals throughout.




For convenience, the description will be organized into the following principal sections: Introduction, Server System, Microcontroller Network, Remote Interface Board, Remote Interface Serial Protocol, Microcontroller Network Bias Power.




I. INTRODUCTION




The inventive computer server system and client computer includes a distributed hardware environment management system that is built as a small self-contained network of microcontrollers. Operating independently of the system processor and operating software, embodiments of the present invention use separate processors for providing information and managing the hardware environment including fans, power supplies and temperature.




Initialization, modification and retrieval of system conditions are performed through utilization of a remote interface by issuing commands to the environmental processors. The system conditions may include system log size, presence of faults in the system log, serial number for each of the environmental processors, serial numbers for each power supply of the system, system identification, system log count, power settings and presence, canister presence, temperature, BUS/CORE speed ratio, fan speeds, settings for fan faults, LCD display, Non-Maskable Interrupt (NMI) request bits, CPU fault summary, FRU status, JTAG enable bit, system log information, remote access password, over-temperature fault, CPU error bits, CPU presence, CPU thermal fault bits, and remote port modem. The aforementioned list of capabilities provided by the present environmental system is not all-inclusive.




The server system and client computer provides mechanisms for the evaluation of the data that the system collects and methods for the diagnosis and repair of server problems in a manner that system errors can be effectively and efficiently managed. The time to evaluate and repair problems is minimized. The server system ensures that the system will not go down, so long as sufficient system resources are available to continue operation, but rather degrade gracefully until the faulty components can be replaced.




II. SERVER SYSTEM




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a server system


100


with a remote client computer will be described. In one embodiment, the server system hardware environment


100


may be built around a self-contained network of microcontrollers, such as, for example, a remote interface microcontroller on the remote interface board or circuit


104


, a system interface microcontroller


106


and a system recorder microcontroller


110


. This distributed service processor network


102


may operate as a fully self-contained subsystem within the server system


100


, continuously monitoring and managing the physical environment of the machine (e.g., temperature, voltages, fan status). The microcontroller network


102


continues to operate and provides a system administrator with critical system information, regardless of the operational status of the server


100


.




Information collected and analyzed by the microcontroller network


102


can be presented to a system administrator using either SNMP-based system management software (not shown), or using microcontroller network Recovery Manager software


130


through a local connection


121


or a dial-in connection


123


. The system management software, which interfaces with the operating software (OS)


108


such as Microsoft Windows NT Version 4.0 or Novell Netware Version 4.11, for example, provides the ability to manage the specific characteristics of the server system, including Hot Plug Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI), power and cooling status, as well as the ability to handle alerts associated with these features.




The microcontroller network Recovery Manager software


130


allows the system administrator to query the status of the server system


100


through the microcontroller network


102


, even when the server is down. Using the microcontroller network remote management capability, a system administrator can use the Recovery Manager


130


to re-start a failed system through a modem connection


123


. First, the administrator can remotely view the microcontroller network Flight Recorder, a feature that stores all system messages, status and error reports in a circular Non-Volatile Random Access Memory buffer (NVRAM)


112


. Then, after determining the cause of the system problem, the administrator can use microcontroller network “fly by wire” capability to reset the system, as well as to power the system off or on. “Fly by wire” denotes that no switch, indicator or other control is directly connected to the function it monitors or controls, but instead, all the control and monitoring connections are made by the microcontroller network


102


.




The remote interface board (RIB)


104


interfaces the server system


100


to an external client computer. The RIB


104


connects to either a local client computer


122


at the same location as the server


100


or to remote (or link) client computer


124


through an optional switch


120


. The client computer


122


/


124


may in one embodiment run either Microsoft Windows 95 or Windows NT Workstation version 4.0 operating software (OS)


132


. The processor and RAM requirements of the client computer


122


/


124


are such as necessary by the OS


132


. The serial port of the client computer


122


/


124


may utilize a type 16550A Universal Asynchronous Receiver Transmitter (UART). The switch facilitates either the local connection


121


or the modem connection


123


at any one time, but allows both types of connections to be connected to the switch. In an another embodiment, either the local connection


121


or the modem connection


123


is connected directly to the RIB


104


. The local connection


121


utilizes a readily available null-modem serial cable to connect to the local client computer. The modem connection may utilize a Hayes-compatible server modem


126


and a Hayes-compatible client modem


128


. In one embodiment, a model V.34X 33.6K data/fax modem available from Zoom is utilized as the client modem and the server modem. In another embodiment, a Sportster 33.6K data/fax modem available from US Robotics is utilized as the client modem.




The steps of connecting the remote client computer


124


to the server


100


will now be briefly described. The remote interface


104


has a serial port connector


204


(

FIG. 3

) that directly connects with a counterpart serial port connector of the external server modem


126


without the use of a cable. If desired, a serial cable could be used to interconnect the remote interface


104


and the server modem


126


. The cable end of an AC to DC power adapter (not shown, for example a 120 Volt AC to 7.5 Volt DC, or a 220V, European or Japanese adapter) is then connected to the DC power connector J2 (220,

FIG. 3

) of the remote interface, while the double-prong end is plugged into a 120 Volt AC wall outlet. One end of an RJ-45 parallel-wire data cable


103


is then plugged into an RJ-45 jack (226,

FIG. 3

) on the remote interface


104


, while the other end is plugged into a RJ-45 Recovery Manager jack on the server


100


. The RJ-45 jack on the server then connects to the microcontroller network


102


. The server modem


126


is then connected to a communications network


127


using an appropriate connector. The communications network


127


may be a public switched telephone network, although other modem types and communication networks are envisioned. For example, if cable modems are used for the server modem


126


and client modem


128


, the communications network can be a cable television network. As another example, satellite modulator/demodulators can be used in conjunction with a satellite network.




At the remote client computer


124


, a serial cable (25-pin D-shell)


129


is used to interconnect the client modem


128


and the client computer


124


. The client modem


128


is then connected to the communications network


127


using an appropriate connector. Each modem is then plugged into an appropriate power source for the modem, such as an AC outlet. At this time, the Recovery Manager software


130


is loaded into the client computer


124


, if not already present, and activated.




The steps of connecting the local client computer


122


to the server


100


are similar, but modems are not necessary. The main difference is that the serial port connector of the remote interface


104


connects to a serial port of the local client computer


122


by the null-modem serial cable


121


.




III. MICROCONTROLLER NETWORK




In one embodiment, the invention is implemented by a network of microcontrollers


102


(FIG.


1


). The microcontrollers may provide functionality for system control, diagnostic routines, self-maintenance control, and event logging processors. A further description of the microcontrollers and microcontroller network is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/942,402, entitled “Diagnostic and Managing Distributed Processor System”, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/942,160, entitled “System Architecture For Remote Access and Control of Environmental Management”.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, in one embodiment of the invention, the network of microcontrollers


102


includes ten processors. One of the purposes of the microcontroller network


102


is to transfer messages to the other components of the server system


100


. The processors may include: a System Interface controller


106


, a CPU A controller


166


, a CPU B controller


168


, a System Recorder


110


, a Chassis controller


170


, a Canister A controller


172


, a Canister B controller


174


, a Canister C controller


176


, a Canister D controller


178


and a Remote Interface controller


200


. The Remote Interface controller


200


is located on the RIB


104


(

FIG. 1

) which is part of the server system


100


, but may preferably be external to a server enclosure. The System Interface controller


106


, the CPU A controller


166


and the CPU B controller


168


are located on a system board


150


in the server


100


. Also located on the system board are one or more central processing units (CPUs) or microprocessors


164


and an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus


162


that connects to the System Interface Controller


106


. Of course, other buses such as PCI, EISA and microchannel may be used. The CPU


164


may be any conventional general purpose single-chip or multi-chip microprocessor such as a Pentium®, Pentium® Pro or Pentium® II processor available from Intel Corporation, a SPARC processor available from Sun Microsystems, a MIPS® processor available from Silicon Graphics, Inc., a Power PC® processor available from Motorola, or an ALPHA® processor available from Digital Equipment Corporation. In addition, the CPU


164


may be any conventional special purpose microprocessor such as a digital signal processor or a graphics processor.




The System Recorder


110


and Chassis controller


170


, along with the NVRAM


112


that connects to the System Recorder


110


, may be located on a backplane


152


of the server


100


. The System Recorder


110


and Chassis controller


170


are typically the first microcontrollers to power up when server power is applied. The System Recorder


110


, the Chassis controller


170


and the Remote Interface microcontroller


200


are the three microcontrollers that have a bias 5 volt power supplied to them. If the main server power is off, an independent power supply source for the bias 5 volt power is provided by the RIB


104


(FIG.


1


). The Canister controllers


172


-


178


are not considered to be part of the backplane


152


because they are located on separate cards and are removable.




Each of the microcontrollers has a unique system identifier or address. The addresses are as follows in Table 1:















TABLE 1











Microcontroller




Address













System Interface controller 106




10







CPU A controller 166




03







CPU B controller 168




04







System Recorder 110




01







Chassis controller 170




02







Canister A controller 172




20







Canister B controller 174




21







Canister C controller 176




22







Canister D controller 178




23







Remote Interface controller 200




11















The microcontrollers may be Microchip Technologies, Inc. PIC processors in one embodiment, although other microcontrollers such as an 8051 available from Intel, an 8751 available from Atmel, and a P80CL580 microprocessor available from Philips, could be utilized. The PIC16C74 (Chassis controller


170


) and PIC16C65 (the other controllers) are members of the PIC16CXX family of CMOS, fully-static, EPROM-based 8-bit microcontrollers. The PIC controllers have 192 bytes of RAM, in addition to program memory, three timer/counters, two capture/compare/Pulse Width Modulation modules and two serial ports. The synchronous serial port is configured as a two-wire Inter-Integrated Circuit (I


2


C) bus in one embodiment of the invention. The PIC controllers use a Harvard architecture in which program and data are accessed from separate memories. This improves bandwidth over traditional von Neumann architecture processors where program and data are fetched from the same memory. Separating program and data memory further allows instructions to be sized differently than the 8-bit wide data word. Instruction opcodes are 14-bit wide making it possible to have all single word instructions. A 14-bit wide program memory access bus fetches a 14-bit instruction in a single cycle.




In one embodiment of the invention, the microcontrollers communicate through an I


2


C serial bus, also referred to as a microcontroller bus


160


. The document “The I


2


C Bus and How to Use It” (Philips Semiconductor, 1992) is hereby incorporated by reference. The I


2


C bus is a bidirectional two-wire bus and may operate at a 400 kbps rate. However, other bus structures and protocols could be employed in connection with this invention. For example, Apple Computer ADB, Universal Serial Bus, IEEE-1394 (Firewire), IEEE-488 (GPIB), RS-485, or Controller Area Network (CAN) could be utilized as the microcontroller bus. Control on the microcontroller bus is distributed. Each microcontroller can be a sender (a master) or a receiver (a slave) and each is interconnected by this bus. A microcontroller directly controls its own resources, and indirectly controls resources of other microcontrollers on the bus.




Here are some of the features of the I


2


C-bus:




Two bus lines are utilized: a serial data line (SDA) and a serial clock line (SCL).




Each device connected to the bus is software addressable by a unique address and simple master/slave relationships exist at all times; masters can operate as master-transmitters or as master-receivers.




The bus is a true multi-master bus including collision detection and arbitration to prevent data corruption if two or more masters simultaneously initiate data transfer.




Serial, 8-bit oriented, bidirectional data transfers can be made at up to 400 kbit/second in the fast mode.




Two wires, serial data (SDA) and serial clock (SCL), carry information between the devices connected to the I


2


C bus. Each device is recognized by a unique address and can operate as either a transmitter or receiver, depending on the function of the device. For example, a memory device connected to the I


2


C bus could both receive and transmit data. In addition to transmitters and receivers, devices can also be considered as masters or slaves when performing data transfers (see Table 2). A master is the device which initiates a data transfer on the bus and generates the clock signals to permit that transfer. At that time, any device addressed is considered a slave.












TABLE 2











Definition of I


2


C-bus terminology












Term




Description









Transmitter




The device which sends the data to the bus






Receiver




The device which receives the data from the bus






Master




The device which initiates a transfer, generates clock







signals and terminates a transfer






Slave




The device addressed by a master






Multi-master




More than one master can attempt to control the bus at







the same time without corrupting the message






Arbitration




Procedure to ensure that, if more than one master







simultaneously tries to control the bus, only one is







allowed to do so and the message is not corrupted






Synchronization




Procedure to synchronize the clock signal of two or







more devices














The I


2


C-bus is a multi-master bus. This means that more than one device capable of controlling the bus can be connected to it. As masters are usually microcontrollers, consider the case of a data transfer between two microcontrollers connected to the I


2


C-bus. This highlights the master-slave and receiver-transmitter relationships to be found on the I


2


C-bus. It should be noted that these relationships are not permanent, but depend on the direction of data transfer at that time. The transfer of data would proceed as follows:




1) Suppose microcontroller A wants to send information to microcontroller B:




microcontroller A (master), addresses microcontroller B (slave);




microcontroller A (master-transmitter), sends data to microcontroller B (slave-receiver);




microcontroller A terminates the transfer.




2) If microcontroller A wants to receive information from microcontroller B:




microcontroller A (master addresses microcontroller B (slave);




microcontroller A (master-receiver) receives data from microcontroller B (slave-transmitter);




microcontroller A terminates the transfer.




Even in this situation, the master (microcontroller A) generates the timing and terminates the transfer.




The possibility of connecting more than one microcontroller to the I


2


C-bus means that more than one master could try to initiate a data transfer at the same time. To avoid the chaos that might ensue from such an event, an arbitration procedure has been developed. This procedure relies on the wired-AND connection of all I


2


C interfaces to the I


2


C-bus.




If two or more masters try to put information onto the bus, the first to produce a ‘one’ when the other produces a ‘zero’ will lose the arbitration. The clock signals during arbitration are a synchronized combination of the clocks generated by the masters using the wired-AND connection to the SCL line.




Generation of clock signal on the I


2


C-bus is the responsibility of master devices. Each master microcontroller generates its own clock signals when transferring data on the bus.




The command, diagnostic, monitoring and history functions of the microcontroller network


102


are accessed using a global network memory model in one embodiment. That is, any function may be queried simply by generating a network “read” request targeted at the function's known global network address. In the same fashion, a function may be exercised simply by “writing” to its global network address. Any microcontroller may initiate read/write activity by sending a message on the I


2


C bus to the microcontroller responsible for the function (which can be determined from the known global address of the function). The network memory model includes typing information as part of the memory addressing information.




Using a network global memory model in one embodiment places relatively modest requirements for the I


2


C message protocol.




All messages conform to the I


2


C message format including addressing and read/write indication.




All


1




2


C messages use seven bit addressing.




Any controller can originate (be a Master) or respond (be a Slave).




All message transactions consist of I


2


C “Combined format” messages. This is made up of two back-to-back I


2


C simple messages with a repeated START condition between (which does not allow for re-arbitrating the bus). The first message is a Write (Master to Slave) and the second message is a Read (Slave to Master).




Two types of transactions are used: Memory-Read and Memory-Write.




Sub-Addressing formats vary depending on data type being used.




IV. REMOTE INTERFACE BOARD




Referring to

FIG. 3

, the remote interface board (RIB)


104


, previously shown in

FIG. 1

, will now be described. The RIB is an interface between the microcontroller network


102


(

FIG. 1

) of the server system


100


and an external client computer


122


/


124


. The server system status and commands are passed through the RS232 connector port


204


at the client side of the RIB to the microcontroller network


102


on the server


100


, controlled through the on-board PIC16C65 microcontroller


200


. Signals in the microcontroller network


102


are transported by the microcontroller bus


160


(FIG.


2


). In one embodiment, the microcontroller bus


160


utilizes the PC bus protocol, previously described. The signals on the microcontroller bus


160


are received from the server


100


by the RIB


104


on the RJ-45 cable


103


and are translated by the PIC16C65 microcontroller


200


into an eight signal RS232 protocol. These RS232 signals are passed through a RS232 line transceiver


202


, such as a LT1133A chip available from Linear Technology, with a baud rate capable of reaching the speed of 120 kbaud. A 25 pin D-Sub connector


204


connects to the other side of the line transceiver


202


and provides the point at which either the local client computer


122


or the server modem


126


makes a connection.




The two wire microcontroller bus


160


is brought in from the server


100


and passed to the microcontroller


200


using the RJ-


45


cable


103


and RJ-45 connector


226


. A switch


228


, such as a QS3126 switch available from Quick Logic, connects to the RJ-45 connector


226


and provides isolation for the data and clock bus signals internal and external to the RIB


104


. If the RIB


104


and switch


228


have power, the switch


228


feeds the bus signals through to a microcontroller bus extender


230


. Otherwise, if the switch


228


does not have power, the microcontroller bus


160


is isolated from the RIB


104


. The bus extender


230


connects between the switch


228


and the microcontroller


200


. The bus extender


230


is a buffer providing drive capability for the clock and data signals. In one embodiment, the bus extender


230


is a 82B715 chip available from Philips Semiconductor. Microcontroller


200


Port C, bit


3


is the clocking bit and Port C, bit


4


is the data line.




Communication with the server modem


126


is based on the RS232 protocol. The microcontroller


200


generates the receive and the transmit signals, where the signal levels are transposed to the RS232 levels by the LT1133A line transceiver


202


. There are three transmit signals, RTS, SOUT and DTR, which are from Port A, bits


2


,


3


and


4


of the microcontroller


200


, whereas the five receive signals are from two ports, DCD, DSR from Port C, bits


1


and


0


and SIN, CTS and RI from Port A, bits


5


,


0


and


1


.




In one embodiment the 25 pin RS232 pin connector


204


is used instead a 9 pin connector, since this type of connector is more common than the other. All the extra pins are not connected except the pins


1


and


7


, where pin


1


is chassis ground and pin


7


is a signal ground.




A static random access memory (SRAM)


208


connects to the microcontroller


200


. In one embodiment, the SRAM


208


is a 32k×8 MT5LC2568 that is available from Micron Technology. The SRAM


208


is also available from other memory manufacturers. An external address register


206


, such as an ABT374, available from Texas Instruments is used for latching the higher addressing bits (A8-A14) of the address for the SRAM


208


so as to expand the address to fifteen bits. The SRAM


208


is used to store system status data, system log data from the NVRAM


112


(FIG.


1


), and other message data for transfer to the external interface port


204


or to a microcontroller on the microcontroller bus


160


(FIG.


2


).




Port D of the microcontroller


200


is the address port. Port B is the data bus for the bi-directional data interconnect. Port E is for the SRAM enable, output tristate and write control signals. The microcontroller


200


operates at a frequency of 12 MHz.




A Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EPROM)


212


is used for storing board serial number identification information for the RIB


104


. The serial number memory


212


is signal powered, retaining the charge into a capacitor sourced through the data line. In one embodiment, the serial number memory


212


stores eight sixteen-byte serial/revision numbers (for maintaining the rework/revision history) and is a DS2502 chip available from Dallas Semiconductor. The programming of memory


212


is handled using a jumper applied through an external connector JI


210


. The serial number memory


212


connects to the microcontroller


200


at Port C, bit


6


and to the external connector JI


210


.




The RIB


104


may be powered through a 7.5 Volt/800 mA supply unit that plugs into a connector J


2




220


. In one embodiment, the supply unit is 120 Volt AC to DC wall adapter. Connector J


2




220


feeds a LT1376 high frequency switching regulator


222


, available from Linear Technology, which regulates the power source. The regulated power output is used locally by the components on the RIB


104


, and 300 mA are sourced to the microcontroller network


102


through a 300 mA fuse


224


and the RJ-45 connector


226


. Thus, the output of the regulator


222


provides an alternative source for a bias-powered partition of the microcontroller network


102


. The bias-powered partition includes the system recorder


110


(FIG.


1


), the NVRAM


112


and the Chassis controller


170


(

FIG. 2

) which are resident on the server backplane


152


.




V. REMOTE INTERFACE SERIAL PROTOCOL




The microcontroller network remote interface serial protocol communicates microcontroller network messages across a point-to-point serial link. This link is between the RIB controller


200


that is in communication with the Recovery Manager


130


at the remote client


122


/


124


. This protocol encapsulates microcontroller network messages in a transmission packet to provide error-free communication and link security.




In one embodiment, the remote interface serial protocol uses the concept of byte stuffing. This means that certain byte values in the data stream have a particular meaning. If that byte value is transmitted by the underlying application as data, it must be transmitted as a two-byte sequence.




The bytes that have a special meaning in this protocol are:





















SOM 306




Start of a message







EOM 316




End of a message







SUB




The next byte in the data stream must be substituted








before processing.







INT 320




Event Interrupt







Data 312




An entire microcontroller network message















As stated above, if any of these byte values occur as data in a message, a two-byte sequence must be substituted for that byte. The sequence is a byte with the value of SUB, followed by a type with the value of the original byte, which is incremented by one. For example, if a SUB byte occurs in a message, it is transmitted as a SUB followed by a byte that has a value of SUB+1.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, the two types of messages


300


used by the remote interface serial protocol will be described.




1. Requests


302


, which are sent by remote management (client) computers


122


/


124


(

FIG. 1

) to the remote interface


104


.




2. Responses


304


, which are returned to the requester


122


/


124


by the remote interface


104


.




The fields of the messages are defined as follows:


















SOM 306




A special data byte value marking the start of a message.






EOM 316




A special data byte value marking the end of a message.






Seq.# 308




A one-byte sequence number, which is incremented on







each request. It is stored in the response.






TYPE 310




One of the following types of requests:














IDENTIFY




Requests the remote interface to send back identification








information about the system to which it is connected.








It also resets the next expected sequence number.








Security authorization does not need to be established








before the request is issued.







SECURE




Establishes secure authorization on the serial link by








checking password security data provided in the message








with the microcontroller network password.







UNSECURE




Clears security authorization on the link and attempts to








disconnect it. This requires security authorization to








have been previously established.







MESSAGE




Passes the data portions of the message to the








microcontroller network for execution. The response








from the microcontroller network is sent back in the data








portion of the response. This requires security








authorization to have been previously established.







POLL




Queries the status of the remote interface. This request








is generally used to determine if an event is pending in








the remote interface.












STATUS 318




One of the following response status values:














OK




Everything relating to communication with the remote








interface is successful.







OK_EVENT




Everything relating to communication with the remote








interface is successful. In addition, there is one or more








events pending in the remote interface.







SEQUENCE




The sequence number of the request is neither the








current sequence number or retransmission request, nor








the next expected sequence number or new request.








Sequence numbers may be reset by an IDENTIFY








request.







CHECK




The check byte in the request message is received








incorrectly.







FORMAT




Something about the format of the message is incorrect.








Most likely, the type field contains an invalid value.







SECURE




The message requires that security authorization be in








effect, or, if the message has a TYPE value of SECURE,








the security check failed.












Check 314




Indicates a message integrity check byte. Currently the







value is 256 minus the sum of previous bytes in the







message. For example, adding all bytes in the message







up to and including the check byte should produce a







result of zero (0).






INT 320




A special one-byte message sent by the remote interface







when it detects the transition from no events pending to







one or more events pending. This message can be used







to trigger reading events from the remote interface.







Events should be read until the return status changes







form OK_EVENT to OK.














VI. MICROCONTROLLER NETWORK BIAS POWER




There are two separate 5 voltpower sources associated with the server system


100


: a 5 voltbias power that is supplied to the Chassis controller


170


(

FIG. 2

) and the System Recorder


110


by a server power supply whenever AC power is enabled, and a 5 Volt (5V) general or main power that is also provided by the server power supply. Bias power is considered to be low current (generally less than one Amp, e.g., 300 mA) but has less delay than general power when the supply is initially turned on. General 5V power is controlled through the Chassis controller


170


. When the server system


100


is down, i.e., the general 5V power is off, the microcontroller network


102


(

FIG. 1

) is still electronically responsive via the remote interface board


104


to the Chassis controller


170


and System Recorder


110


. Commands can be issued from a software application running on the local client computer


122


or remote client computer


124


to turn on the general 5V power, read the system log, check system type, and so forth.




When the general 5V power is off at the server


100


, the 5V bias power supplied by the server power supply will also be off. However, as long as the independent power supply


360


located at the remote interface


104


is operational, the remote interface board provides the 5V bias power and sends it via the RJ-45 cable


103


(

FIG. 1

) to the Chassis controller


170


and the System Recorder


110


on the microcontroller network


102


. This power supply


360


could be a battery, or an AC/DC adapter or any other source of electrical power.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, the bias power portion of the remote interface board


104


will be described. As previously described, the independent RIB power supply


360


, such as a 120 Volt AC/7.5 Volt DC power adapter, is connected to the DC power connector J


2




220


. Pin


1


of the connector J


2


connects via line


370


to provide the DC voltage to a VIN pin of the LT1376 high frequency step-down switching regulator


222


. Pin


2


of the connector J


2


connects to ground via line


372


. The regulator


222


, along with the external components suggested in the data sheet for the Linear Technology LT1376 component, provides a positive 5V output on a VCC5 line


374


. The VCC5 line


374


connects to the other components on the RIB


104


to provide power to each RIB component. The VCC5 line


374


also connects to a fuse


224


. In one embodiment the fuse


224


may be rated at 300 milliAmperes. The fuse


224


further connects via XVCC5 line


376


to pin


5


of RJ-45 connector


226


, thereby providing 300 mA, positive 5V bias power to be fed to the server microcontroller network


102


(FIG.


1


). The extender microcontroller bus clock (XLCL) and data (XLDA) signals to/from the switch


228


(

FIG. 3

) also connect to the RJ-45 connector


226


at pins


2


and


4


, respectively. These signals correspond to I


2


C clock and data signals.




Referring to

FIG. 6

, the bias power portion of the server


100


will now be described. The bias power portion of the server is generally located at the backplane


152


(FIG.


2


). The RJ-45 cable


103


(

FIG. 1

) interconnects the RJ-45 connector


226


(

FIG. 5

) and a RJ-45 connector


406


at the server


100


. Pin


5


of the RJ-45 connector


406


provides the 300 mA, positive 5V bias power from the RIB


104


on a line


408


. The line


408


feeds the anode side of a diode


404


. In one embodiment, the diode is a type MBRS320. The cathode side of diode


404


is the BIAS





5V power


400


for selected components of the server


100


. The selected components include the Chassis controller


170


, the System Recorder


110


and the NVRAM


112


as shown in FIG.


6


. Other components closely affiliated with the Chassis controller


170


and System Recorder


110


are also powered by the bias power. Of course, in other embodiments, other components of the diagnostic network


102


or of the server


100


could be fed power by the RIB


104


via its independent power supply


360


.




The diode


404


prevents the 5V bias power from the server power supply


410


from being supplied to the RIB


104


via the RJ-45 cable


103


. However, when the server power supply is off, the bias power from the RIB


104


flows on line


408


through diode


404


to supply the bias power driven components of the server


100


. In addition, when the server 5V bias power is below a nominal voltage, the RIB supplied bias power engages to brings the bias





5V voltage up to 5V.




The extender microcontroller bus clock (XLCL) and data (XLDA) signals link to a microcontroller bus extender circuit


402


. The bus extender


402


is a buffer providing drive capability for the clock and data signals. In one embodiment, the bus extender


402


is a 82B715 chip available from Philips Semiconductor. The outputs of the bus extender


402


are the serial clock (SCL) and serial data (SDA) signals of the microcontroller bus


160


. These two signals on the microcontroller bus


160


connect to the Chassis controller


170


and System Recorder


110


, as previously described.




An example of using the independent powering aspect of the server system


100


will now be described. In the event of a server failure where the server power supply


410


is off, the server 5V bias power is not available for the server components. When this situation occurs, the RIB


104


supplies the bias power to the bias powered components on the server. The loss of power by the server power supply


410


is reported as an event by the Chassis controller


170


(which is powered by the RIM supplied bias power) to the RIB microcontroller


200


(

FIG. 3

) via the microcontroller network


102


. This event is sent to the Recovery Manager


130


(

FIG. 1

) so as to be displayed to a user of the client computer


122


/


124


. The user may then elect to view the system log in the NVRAM


112


by use of the Recovery Manager


130


at the client computer


122


/


124


to determine the cause of the problem. After diagnosing the server problem, the user may then decide to power up the server by issuing a power up command through the Recovery Manager


130


to the Chassis controller


170


. The Chassis controller


170


then powers up the server power supply


410


to restore general power to the server system.




While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out the fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the system illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art, without departing from the intent of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A system for independent powering of a first computer, comprising:a first computer storing status information; a first computer power supply that supplies power to the first computer; a remote interface power supply that is independent from the first computer power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from the remote interface power supply so as to power at least a computational device in the remote interface circuit and is configured to provide independent power to only a portion of the first computer to facilitate reading of the status information.
  • 2. The system defined in claim 1, additionally comprising a second computer in data communication with the first computer through the remote interface circuit.
  • 3. The system defined in claim 2, wherein the second computer displays the status information.
  • 4. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the independent power provided by the remote interface circuit is isolated from the first computer power supply by a diode.
  • 5. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the independent power supply includes an AC to DC adapter.
  • 6. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the status information is stored in a system log.
  • 7. The system defined in claim 6, wherein the system log is stored in a non-volatile, random access memory (NVRAM).
  • 8. The system defined in claim 7, wherein the NVRAM is accessed by a microcontroller.
  • 9. The system defined in claim 1, wherein independent power is provided to the first computer when the first computer power supply is off.
  • 10. The system defined in claim 1, wherein independent power is provided to the first computer when the first computer power supply is inoperable or operating below a threshold power level.
  • 11. The system defined in claim 1, wherein the portion of the first computer includes a microcontroller.
  • 12. A system for independent powering of a first computer, comprising:a first computer storing status information; a first computer power supply that supplies power to the first computer; a remote interface power supply, wherein the remote interface power supply provides power that is independent of the power supplied by the first computer power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives the power from the remote interface power supply so as to power at least a computational device in the remote interface circuit and is configured to provide the independent power to only a portion of the first computer.
  • 13. The system defined in claim 12, wherein the independent power facilitates reading of the status information when the first computer power supply is inoperable or operating below a threshold power level.
  • 14. The system defined in claim 12, wherein the portion of the first computer includes a microcontroller.
  • 15. A system for independent powering of a computer, comprising:a first computer having a first computer power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from a power supply that is independent from the first computer power supply so as to power at least a computational device in the remote interface circuit and provides independent power to only a portion of the first computer if the first computer power supply is inoperable or operating below a threshold power level.
  • 16. The system defined in claim 15, wherein the portion of the first computer includes a microcontroller.
  • 17. The system defined in claim 16, wherein the remote interface circuit includes a remote interface microcontroller connected by a bus to the microcontroller in the first computer.
  • 18. The system defined in claim 15, additionally comprising a second computer in data communication with the first computer through the remote interface circuit.
  • 19. The system defined in claim 18, wherein the second computer remotely turns on the first computer power supply through the remote interface circuit, wherein a command is received by the remote interface circuit and the computational device executes the command.
  • 20. The system defined in claim 15, wherein the power provided by the remote interface circuit is isolated from the first computer power supply by a diode.
  • 21. A system for independent powering of a first computer, comprising:a first computer storing status information and having a system processor; a first computer power supply that supplies power to the first computer; a remote interface power supply that is independent from the first computer power supply; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from the remote interface power supply and is configured to provide independent power to at least a portion of the first computer to facilitate reading of the status information without the system processor being powered.
  • 22. The system defined in claim 21, additionally comprising a second computer connected to the first computer through the remote interface circuit.
  • 23. The system defined in claim 22, wherein the second computer displays the status information.
  • 24. A system for independent powering of a computer, comprising:a first computer having a first computer power supply and having a system processor; and a remote interface circuit that receives power from a power supply that is independent from the first computer power supply and provides independent power to at least a portion of the first computer, without powering the system processor, if the first computer power supply is inoperable or operating below a threshold power level.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The subject matter of U.S. Patent Application entitled “Method of Independent Powering of Diagnostic Processes on a Computer System,” filed on Oct. 1, 1997, application Ser. No. 08/942,320, and having attorney Docket No. MNFRAME.002A4 is related to this application.

US Referenced Citations (305)
Number Name Date Kind
4057847 Lowell et al. Nov 1977
4100597 Fleming et al. Jul 1978
4449182 Rubinson et al. May 1984
4672535 Katzman et al. Jun 1987
4692918 Elliott et al. Sep 1987
4695946 Andreasen et al. Sep 1987
4707803 Anthony, Jr. et al. Nov 1987
4769764 Levanon Sep 1988
4774502 Kimura Sep 1988
4821180 Gerety et al. Apr 1989
4835737 Herrig et al. May 1989
4894792 Mitchell et al. Jan 1990
4949245 Martin et al. Aug 1990
4999787 McNally et al. Mar 1991
5006961 Monico Apr 1991
5007431 Donehoo, III Apr 1991
5033048 Pierce et al. Jul 1991
5051720 Kittirutsunetorn Sep 1991
5073932 Yossifor et al. Dec 1991
5103391 Barrett Apr 1992
5118970 Olson et al. Jun 1992
5121500 Arlington et al. Jun 1992
5123017 Simpkins et al. Jun 1992
5136708 Lapourtre et al. Aug 1992
5136715 Hirose et al. Aug 1992
5138619 Fasang et al. Aug 1992
5157663 Major et al. Oct 1992
5210855 Bartol May 1993
5222897 Collins et al. Jun 1993
5245615 Treu Sep 1993
5247683 Holmes et al. Sep 1993
5253348 Scalise Oct 1993
5261094 Everson et al. Nov 1993
5265098 Mattson et al. Nov 1993
5266838 Gerner Nov 1993
5269011 Yanai et al. Dec 1993
5272382 Heald et al. Dec 1993
5272584 Austruy et al. Dec 1993
5276814 Bourke et al. Jan 1994
5276863 Heider Jan 1994
5277615 Hastings et al. Jan 1994
5280621 Barnes et al. Jan 1994
5283905 Saadeh et al. Feb 1994
5307354 Cramer et al. Apr 1994
5311397 Harshberger et al. May 1994
5311451 Barrett May 1994
5317693 Cuenod et al. May 1994
5329625 Kannan et al. Jul 1994
5337413 Lui et al. Aug 1994
5351276 Doll, Jr. et al. Sep 1994
5367670 Ward et al. Nov 1994
5379184 Barraza et al. Jan 1995
5379409 Ishikawa Jan 1995
5386567 Lien et al. Jan 1995
5388267 Chan et al. Feb 1995
5402431 Saadeh et al. Mar 1995
5404494 Garney Apr 1995
5423025 Goldman et al. Jun 1995
5430717 Fowler et al. Jul 1995
5430845 Rimmer et al. Jul 1995
5432715 Shigematsu et al. Jul 1995
5432946 Allard et al. Jul 1995
5438678 Smith Aug 1995
5440748 Sekine et al. Aug 1995
5448723 Rowett Sep 1995
5455933 Schieve et al. Oct 1995
5460441 Hastings et al. Oct 1995
5463766 Schieve et al. Oct 1995
5465349 Geronimi et al. Nov 1995
5471617 Farrand et al. Nov 1995
5471634 Giorgio et al. Nov 1995
5473499 Weir Dec 1995
5483419 Kaczeus, Sr. et al. Jan 1996
5485550 Dalton Jan 1996
5485607 Lomet et al. Jan 1996
5487148 Komori et al. Jan 1996
5491791 Glowny et al. Feb 1996
5493574 McKinley Feb 1996
5493666 Fitch Feb 1996
5513314 Kandasamy et al. Apr 1996
5513339 Agrawal et al. Apr 1996
5515515 Kennedy et al. May 1996
5517646 Piccirillo et al. May 1996
5519851 Bender et al. May 1996
5526289 Dinh et al. Jun 1996
5528409 Cucci et al. Jun 1996
5530810 Bowman Jun 1996
5533193 Roscoe Jul 1996
5535326 Baskey et al. Jul 1996
5542055 Amini et al. Jul 1996
5546272 Moss et al. Aug 1996
5548712 Larson et al. Aug 1996
5555510 Verseput et al. Sep 1996
5559764 Chen et al. Sep 1996
5559958 Farrand et al. Sep 1996
5559965 Oztaskin et al. Sep 1996
5560022 Dunstan et al. Sep 1996
5564024 Pemberton Oct 1996
5566299 Billings et al. Oct 1996
5566339 Perholtz et al. Oct 1996
5568610 Brown Oct 1996
5568619 Blackledge et al. Oct 1996
5572403 Mills Nov 1996
5577205 Hwang et al. Nov 1996
5579487 Meyerson et al. Nov 1996
5579491 Jeffries et al. Nov 1996
5579528 Register Nov 1996
5581712 Herrman Dec 1996
5581714 Amini et al. Dec 1996
5584030 Husak et al. Dec 1996
5586250 Carbonneau et al. Dec 1996
5588121 Reddin et al. Dec 1996
5588144 Inoue et al. Dec 1996
5592611 Midgely et al. Jan 1997
5596711 Burckhartt et al. Jan 1997
5598407 Bud et al. Jan 1997
5602758 Lincoln et al. Feb 1997
5604873 Fite et al. Feb 1997
5606672 Wade Feb 1997
5608865 Midgely et al. Mar 1997
5608876 Cohen et al. Mar 1997
5615207 Gephardt et al. Mar 1997
5621159 Brown et al. Apr 1997
5621892 Cook Apr 1997
5622221 Genga, Jr. et al. Apr 1997
5625238 Ady et al. Apr 1997
5627962 Goodrum et al. May 1997
5628028 Michelson May 1997
5630076 Saulpaugh et al. May 1997
5631847 Kikinis May 1997
5632021 Jennings et al. May 1997
5636341 Matsushita et al. Jun 1997
5638289 Yamada et al. Jun 1997
5644470 Benedict et al. Jul 1997
5644731 Liencres et al. Jul 1997
5651006 Fujino et al. Jul 1997
5652832 Kane et al. Jul 1997
5652833 Takizawa et al. Jul 1997
5652839 Giorgio et al. Jul 1997
5652892 Ugajin Jul 1997
5652908 Douglas et al. Jul 1997
5655081 Bonnell et al. Aug 1997
5655083 Bagley Aug 1997
5655148 Richman et al. Aug 1997
5659682 Devarakonda et al. Aug 1997
5664118 Nishigaki et al. Sep 1997
5664119 Jeffries et al. Sep 1997
5666538 DeNicola Sep 1997
5668943 Attanasio et al. Sep 1997
5668992 Hammer et al. Sep 1997
5669009 Buktenica et al. Sep 1997
5671371 Kondo et al. Sep 1997
5675723 Ekrot et al. Oct 1997
5680288 Carey et al. Oct 1997
5682328 Roeber et al. Oct 1997
5684671 Hobbs et al. Nov 1997
5689637 Johnson et al. Nov 1997
5696895 Hemphill et al. Dec 1997
5696899 Kalwitz Dec 1997
5696949 Young Dec 1997
5696970 Sandage et al. Dec 1997
5701417 Lewis et al. Dec 1997
5704031 Mikami et al. Dec 1997
5708775 Nakamura Jan 1998
5708776 Kikinis Jan 1998
5712754 Sides et al. Jan 1998
5715456 Bennett et al. Feb 1998
5717570 Kikinis Feb 1998
5721935 DeSchepper et al. Feb 1998
5724529 Smith et al. Mar 1998
5726506 Wood Mar 1998
5727207 Gates et al. Mar 1998
5732266 Moore et al. Mar 1998
5737708 Grob et al. Apr 1998
5737747 Vishlitzky et al. Apr 1998
5740378 Rehl et al. Apr 1998
5742514 Bonola Apr 1998
5742833 Dea et al. Apr 1998
5747889 Raynham et al. May 1998
5748426 Bedingfield et al. May 1998
5752164 Jones May 1998
5754396 Felcman et al. May 1998
5754449 Hoshal et al. May 1998
5754797 Takahashi May 1998
5758165 Shuff May 1998
5758352 Reynolds et al. May 1998
5761033 Wilhelm Jun 1998
5761045 Olson et al. Jun 1998
5761085 Giorgio Jun 1998
5761462 Neal et al. Jun 1998
5761707 Aiken et al. Jun 1998
5764924 Hong Jun 1998
5764968 Ninomiya Jun 1998
5765008 Desai et al. Jun 1998
5765198 McCrocklin et al. Jun 1998
5767844 Stoye Jun 1998
5768541 Pan-Ratzlaff Jun 1998
5768542 Enstrom et al. Jun 1998
5771343 Hafner et al. Jun 1998
5774640 Kurio Jun 1998
5774645 Beaujard et al. Jun 1998
5774741 Choi Jun 1998
5777897 Giorgio Jul 1998
5778197 Dunham Jul 1998
5781703 Desai et al. Jul 1998
5781716 Hemphill et al. Jul 1998
5781744 Johnson et al. Jul 1998
5781767 Inoue et al. Jul 1998
5781798 Beatty et al. Jul 1998
5784555 Stone Jul 1998
5784576 Guthrie et al. Jul 1998
5787019 Knight et al. Jul 1998
5787459 Stallmo et al. Jul 1998
5787491 Merkin et al. Jul 1998
5790775 Marks et al. Aug 1998
5790831 Lin et al. Aug 1998
5793948 Asahi et al. Aug 1998
5793987 Quackenbush et al. Aug 1998
5794035 Golub et al. Aug 1998
5796185 Takata et al. Aug 1998
5796580 Komatsu et al. Aug 1998
5796934 Bhanot et al. Aug 1998
5796981 Abudayyeh et al. Aug 1998
5797023 Berman et al. Aug 1998
5798828 Thomas et al. Aug 1998
5799036 Staples Aug 1998
5799196 Flannery Aug 1998
5801921 Miller Sep 1998
5802269 Poisner et al. Sep 1998
5802298 Imai et al. Sep 1998
5802305 McKaughan et al. Sep 1998
5802324 Wunderlich et al. Sep 1998
5802393 Begun et al. Sep 1998
5802552 Fandrich et al. Sep 1998
5802592 Chess et al. Sep 1998
5803357 Lakin Sep 1998
5805804 Laursen et al. Sep 1998
5805834 McKinley et al. Sep 1998
5809224 Schultz et al. Sep 1998
5809256 Najemy Sep 1998
5809287 Stupek, Jr. et al. Sep 1998
5809311 Jones Sep 1998
5809555 Hobson Sep 1998
5812748 Ohran et al. Sep 1998
5812750 Dev et al. Sep 1998
5812757 Okamoto et al. Sep 1998
5812858 Nookala et al. Sep 1998
5815117 Kolanek Sep 1998
5815647 Buckland et al. Sep 1998
5815651 Litt Sep 1998
5815652 Ote et al. Sep 1998
5821596 Miu et al. Oct 1998
5822547 Boesch et al. Oct 1998
5826043 Smith et al. Oct 1998
5829046 Tzelnic et al. Oct 1998
5835719 Gibson et al. Nov 1998
5835738 Blackledge, Jr. et al. Nov 1998
5838932 Alzien Nov 1998
5841964 Yamaguchi Nov 1998
5841991 Russell Nov 1998
5845061 Miyamoto et al. Dec 1998
5845095 Reed et al. Dec 1998
5850546 Kim Dec 1998
5852720 Gready et al. Dec 1998
5852724 Glenn, II et al. Dec 1998
5857074 Johnson Jan 1999
5857102 McChesney et al. Jan 1999
5864653 Tavallaei et al. Jan 1999
5864654 Marchant Jan 1999
5864713 Terry Jan 1999
5867730 Leyda Feb 1999
5875307 Ma et al. Feb 1999
5875308 Egan et al. Feb 1999
5875310 Buckland et al. Feb 1999
5878237 Olarig Mar 1999
5878238 Gan et al. Mar 1999
5881311 Woods Mar 1999
5884027 Garbus et al. Mar 1999
5884049 Atkinson Mar 1999
5886424 Kim Mar 1999
5889965 Wallach et al. Mar 1999
5892898 Fujii et al. Apr 1999
5892915 Duso et al. Apr 1999
5892928 Wallach et al. Apr 1999
5893140 Vahalia et al. Apr 1999
5898846 Kelly Apr 1999
5898888 Guthrie et al. Apr 1999
5905867 Giorgio May 1999
5907672 Matze et al. May 1999
5909568 Nason Jun 1999
5911779 Stallmo et al. Jun 1999
5913034 Malcolm Jun 1999
5922060 Goodrum Jul 1999
5930358 Rao Jul 1999
5935262 Barrett et al. Aug 1999
5936960 Stewart Aug 1999
5938751 Tavallaei et al. Aug 1999
5941996 Smith et al. Aug 1999
5964855 Bass et al. Oct 1999
5983349 Kodama et al. Nov 1999
5987554 Liu et al. Nov 1999
5987621 Duso et al. Nov 1999
5987627 Rawlings, III Nov 1999
6012130 Beyda et al. Jan 2000
6038624 Chan et al. Mar 2000
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0 866 403 A1 Sep 1998 EP
04 333 118 Nov 1992 JP
05 233 110 Sep 1993 JP
07 093 064 Apr 1995 JP
07 261 874 Oct 1995 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
Haban, D. & D. Wybranietz, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 16(2):197-211, Feb. 1990, “A Hybrid Monitor for Behavior and Performance Analysis of Distributed Systems”.
ftp.cdrom.com/pub/os2/diskutil/, PHDX software, phdx.zip download, Mar. 1995, “Parallel Hard Disk Xfer”.
Cmasters, Usenet post to microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup, Aug. 1997, “Re: FDISK switches”.
Hilderbrand, N., Usenet post to comp.msdos.programmer, May 1995, “Re: Structure of disk partition info”.
Lewis, L., Usenet post to alt.msdos.batch, Apr. 1997, “Re: Need help with automating FDISK and FORMAT”.
Netframe, http://www.netframe-support.com/technology/datasheets/data.htm, before Mar. 1997, “Netframe ClusterSystem 9008 Data Sheet”.
Simos, M., Usenet post to comp.os.msdos.misc, Apr. 1997, “Re: Auto FDISK and FORMAT”.
Wood, H. H., Usenet post to comp.os.netware.misc, Aug. 1996, “Re: Workstation duplication method for WIN95”.
Lyons, Computer Reseller News, Issue 721, pp. 61-62, Feb. 3, 1997, “ACC Releases Low-Cost Solution for ISPs”.
M2 Communications, M2 Presswire, 2 pages, Dec. 19, 1996, “Novell IntranetWare Supports Hot Pluggable PCI from NetFRAME”.
Rigney, PC Magazine, 14(17): 375-379, Oct. 10, 1995, “The One for the Road (Mobile-aware capabilities in Windows 95)”.
Shanley, and Anderson, PCI System Architecture, Third Edition, p. 382, Copyright 1995.
Gorlick, M., Conf. Proceedings: ACM/ONR Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Debugging, pp. 175-181, 1991, “The Flight Recorder: An Architectural Aid for System Monitoring”.
IBM Technical Disclosure Bulliten, 92A=62947, pp. 391-394, Oct. 1992, Method for Card Hot Plug Detection and Control.
Davis, T, Usenet post to alt.msdos.programmer, Apr. 1997, “Re: How do I create an FDISK batch file?”.
Davis, T., Usenet post to alt.msdos.batch, Apr. 1997, “Re: Need help with automating FDISK and FORMAT . . . ”.
NetFRAME Systems Incorporated, Doc. No. 78-1000226-01, pp. 1-2, 5-8, 359-404, and 471-512, Apr. 1996, “NetFRAME Clustered Multiprocessing Software: NW0496 DC-ROM for Novell® NetWare® 4.1 SMP, 4.1, and 3.12.”.
Shanley, and Anderson, PCI System Architecture, Third Edition, Chapter 15, pp. 297-302, Copyright 1995, “Intro To Configuration Address Space.”
Shanley, and Anderson, PCI System Architecture, Third Edition, Chapter 16, pp. 303-328, Copyright 1995, “Configuration Transactions.”
Sun Microsystems Computer Company, Part No. 802-5355-10, Rev. A, May 1996, “Solstice SyMON User's Guid.”.
Sun Microsystems, Part No. 802-6569-11, Release 1.0.1, Nov. 1996, “Remotes Systems Diagnostics Installation & User Guide.”.
Shanley and Anderson, PCI System Architecture, Third Edition, Chapters 15 & 16, pp. 297-328, CR 1995.
PCI Hot-Plug Specification, Preliminary Revision for Review Only, Revision 0.9, pp. i-iv, and 1-25, Mar. 5, 1997.
SES SCSI-3 Enclosure Services, X3T10/Project 1212-D/Rev 8a, pp. i, iii-x, 1-76, and I-1 (index), Jan. 16, 1997.
Compaq Computer Corporation, Technology Brief, pp. 1-13, Dec. 1996, “Where Do I Plug the Cable? Solving the Logical-Physical Slot Numbering Problem.”
NetFRAME Systems Incorporated,News Release, 3 pages, referring to May, 9, 1994, “NetFRAME's New High-Availability ClusterServer Systems Avoid Scheduled as well as Unscheduled Downtime.”
Herr, et al., Linear Technology Magazine, Design Features, pp. 21-23, Jun. 1997, “Hot Swapping the PCI Bus.”
Lockareff, M., HTINews,, http://www.hometoys.com/htinews/dec96/articles/Ionworks.htm,Dec. 1996, “Lonworks—An Introduction”.
NetFRAME Systems Incorporated, datasheet, Feb. 1992, “NF450FT Network Mainframe”.
NetFRAME Systems Incorporated, datasheet, Mar. 1996, “NetFRAME Cluster Server 8000”.
Schofield, M.J., http://www.omegas.co.uk/CAN/canworks.htm, Copyright 1996, 1997, “Controller Area Network—How CAN Works”.
Http://www.nrtt.demon.co.uk/cantech.html, May 28, 1997, “CAN: Technical overview”.
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60/046397 May 1997 US
60/047016 May 1997 US
60/046416 May 1997 US