Patent Application
20140233938
The present invention relates to a system for interconnecting one or more nodes attached to a passive optical network and to a remote node for a passive optical network.
The standard physical fiber layout for passive optical network based fiber-to-the-home systems (FTTH) is a tree with 32, 64 or 128 leaves, where the leaves are installed at the customer side. As shown schematically in
The deployed FTTH system may e.g. be a time-division multiplexing PON, e.g. an EPON, GPON, or 10G-PON. The splitter is thus a power splitter that splits the incoming optical signal from the feeder evenly among the distribution fibers.
In another scenario the deployed FTTH system may comprise a WDM PON which uses a wavelength demultiplexer, e.g. an arrayed waveguide grating (AWG).
For the access network sharing case, the mobile operator will use the fibers of the leaves to attach its basestations to its own wired (core) network. Several approaches can be followed for this. The most obvious one is to treat a basestation like any other user and add it as client to the fixed operators' network. While this works from a technical perspective, the required bandwidth differs strongly between a single normal user and a basestation that multiplexes traffic of hundreds of users. Furthermore, this might also create organisational issues, e.g. with respect to traffic separation. A more viable approach is adding further wavelengths to the already deployed passive optical network to attach the basestations. This provides sufficient bandwidth and allows separating the traffic easily. Independent of the used approach however, the underlying treelike fiber structure is vulnerable to faults as will be outlined below.
In the following, the term “basestation” will be used when referring to a ‘client’ node of a mobile operator being connected as a node to a leaf of a passive optical network (PON). Such a “basestation” is composed of radio layer equipment as well as optical layer equipment. For simplicity and to avoid confusion, this term is used in the following to refer to the collection of these equipments. The term optical network unit “ONU” will be used whenever this refers to a client node or a node of the fixed operator being connected as a node to a leaf of a passive optical network (PON).
The treelike fiber structure of a fiber to the home (FTTH) system does not provide redundancy. Faults like a fiber cut can disconnect up to 128 leaves. If the fibers only attach fixed operator's customers, this risk normally is tolerated for cost reasons. If some of the leaves host basestations, the picture changes. As a basestations serves hundreds of customers, the number of users affected by a fault is much higher. Thus, while the fixed operator might not require protection against such faults, protection is important for the mobile operator.
There exist four protection schemes for passive optical networks that have been standardized by ITU in the ITU-T Recommendation G.983.1 (ITU-T, 2004). They all involve partial or complete duplication of either the fiber tree and/or the active networking equipment (i.e. the central office side OLTs and the client side optical network units ONUs). The type A scheme provides a redundant feeder fiber; the type B scheme duplicates the OLT side equipment as well as the feeder fiber; the type C scheme duplicates the complete infrastructure, connecting each ONU to two fiber trees; the type D also uses a full duplication but adds an additional link between the remote nodes that allows to also attach ONUs that do not require protection (and thus do not require distribution fiber redundancy). The first two schemes add protection (for the feeder fiber) for all nodes and are thus different from the approach of the present invention described later that is designed for a mixture of protected and unprotected nodes. Type C scheme also is different as it duplicates the complete equipment and protects all nodes. Also the type D scheme is not suited for the present application scenario. It results in some protection (of the feeder fiber) even for those nodes without protection requirements. It duplicates the fiber infrastructure but still requires a joint wavelength assignment; it is not possible to run an own TDM PON on each of the two sub-trees. Thus, the cost for the unprotected nodes may be higher than with the scheme proposed later by the present invention. Last but not least, scheme D introduces the protection link between the remote nodes while the proposed approach is different.
A number of different solutions exist that vary the idea to duplicate fibers, e.g. Chan, T.-K., Chan, C.-K., Chen, L.-K., & F., T. (2003), A self-protected architecture for wavelength-division-multiplexed passive optical networks. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 15 (11), 1660-1662, where the feeder section is deployed as ring and neighbor-ONUs are connected with an additional fiber link thus protecting each other in case of a distribution fiber cut.
Ghazisaidi et al. (Ghazisaidi, N., Scheutzow, M., & Maier, M. (2010). Survivability Analysis of Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks and Fiber-Wireless Access Networks. IEEE Transactions on Reliability) propose to install a wireless mesh network that can be used to communicate in case the fixed fiber network fails. Chinese Patent Application No. CN000101431702A proposes to use wireless protection as well, but between pairs of neighboring ONUs. In case of a failure, an ONU can activate a link to a neighbor ONU via a wireless channel.
In contrast, the later described approach proposed herein establishes the protection between complete trees rather for single ONUs/basestations. As will become apparent later the two ONUs/basestations are in different fiber trees and the link not only transports the protection signal of a single ONU/basestation but also those of the other ONUs/basestations on the same tree. While the scheme of CN000101431702A provides protection from a cut in the distribution section, the proposed scheme protects the feeder section.
Zong et al. (Zong, L., Ting, W., Ji, P., Xu, L., & Cvijetic, M. (2006 September). A Novel Protection Scheme for WDM-PONs Using Waveband Filters. ECOC 06: European Conference on Optical Communications 2006) propose a protection scheme (only for the distribution fibers) that requires an active remote node and an additional physical protection path. This path connects the remote node to the first ONU, the first ONU with the second ONU, the second ONU with the third ONU, and so on until the last ONU. In case a distribution fiber fails, the remote node (that requires active electronic components in this configuration) can switch the wavelength for the affected ONU to the protection path.
Compared to the approach presented later herein, there are four differences. First, the architecture requires an active remote node and does not work with a passive configuration. Second, all ONUS require two fiber connections and thus much newly deployed fiber while the later described approach requires only few nodes to have such a ‘dual-homing’. Third, the solution of Zong et al. only protects the distribution fibers but does not survive a cut in the feeder fibers. And fourth, while the later proposed approach (at least partly) survives the failure of the remote node, the scheme of Zong et al. will be completely disconnected in such a case.
Son et al. (Son, E., Han, K., Lee, J., & Chung, Y. (2005). Survivable network architectures for WDM PON. OFC'05: Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference) introduce the idea to add a link between the remote nodes to protect the two adjacent WDM PONS, a variation of the above-presented ITU-T standard scheme D. This link allows protecting the feeder fiber, but also requires a coordinated wavelength assignment between the two PONs. Furthermore, the protection link is established between the remote nodes in contrast to the later proposed approach that establishes this link between the leafs.
Based on these prior art approaches it is an object of the invention to provide an approach for enhancing the interconnection between passive optical networks in a way which enhances their protection or their capacity.
It is desirable to support two types of nodes on the same fiber infrastructure: cheap, unprotected nodes with low, varying bandwidth requirements for the fixed operator and more expensive, protected basestations with high-volume, steady traffic for the mobile operator.
According to one embodiment there is provided a system for interconnecting one or more nodes attached to the leaves of an optical distribution network (ODN), comprising: A first and a second optical distribution network respectively comprising a remote node for distributing signals received by said remote node via a trunk feeder fiber from a central office and/or an optical line terminal to a plurality of leaf nodes connected to said optical distribution network;
a link connecting a first leaf node connected to the first optical distribution network to a second leaf node connected to the second optical distribution network, wherein
the remote node of the second optical distribution network comprises an input unit being adapted to receive signals from the central office and/or optical line terminal of the second optical distribution network, said remote node further comprising an additional signal path connecting said second leaf node to the input unit of said remote node to enable said remote node to forward an optical signal from said second leaf node which has received the signal from said first leaf node to the other leaf nodes of said second optical distribution network to thereby enable to compensate for a failure in said trunk fiber by routing the signal intended for the leaf nodes of said second optical distribution network to said first optical distribution network, via said first leaf node and said link to said second leaf node and then via the additional signal path to the leaf nodes of said second optical distribution network.
By interconnecting the leaf nodes of the separate optical distribution networks a further signal distribution path is provided which can be used to e.g. protect against a connection failure or to increase the capacity.
According to one embodiment said plurality of leaf nodes comprise one or more basestations; and/or
said first leaf node and said second leaf node are base stations.
This is a particularly advantageous implementation of a use case, since it enables the protection of base stations against a connection failure, and for base stations such a failure would be rather significant, since usually they have many end users being connected to them. Therefore an efficient protection scheme for the base stations against a connection failure is highly desirable.
According to one embodiment optical distribution networks shared between a fixed network operator and a mobile network operator, the clients of said fixed network operator comprising as clients optical network units which are connected as leaf nodes without being protected by being connected to at least one other leave of another optical distribution tree, and the clients of said mobile network operator comprising basestations which are connected as leaves nodes are protected against failure by being connected to at least one other leave node of said other optical distribution network.
This is an advantageously efficient implementation for a shared network where the most sensitive and relevant nodes, the base stations, are provided with failure protection while the less relevant optical network units (ONUS) are not protected.
According to one embodiment said system is adapted to forward, in case of a failure of the connection between a central office and the remote node of said second optical distribution network, said optical signal intended for the leaf nodes of said second optical distribution network via the first optical distribution network to said first leaf node, via said link from said first leaf node to said second leaf node, and via said remote node of said second optical distribution network from said second leaf node to the other base stations connected to said second optical distribution network, and/or
said system is adapted to forward, in case of a failure of the connection between the remote node of said second optical distribution network and said second leaf node, said optical signal intended for said second leaf node of said second optical distribution network via the first optical distribution network to said first leaf node and via said link from said first leaf node to said second leaf node.
In this manner a failure protection against a connection failure in the trunk line (first alternative) or at the leave node (second alternative) can be efficiently implemented.
According to one embodiment the link between said first leaf node and said second leaf node is a wireless link.
This is a particularly efficient and advantageous implementation, because it requires no cable infrastructure and can make use of the already existing capabilities of the basestations to provide a wireless link.
According to one embodiment there is provided remote node for an optical distribution network which connects a central office and/or or an optical line terminal with a plurality of optical nodes, said remote node comprising:
An input unit for being connected to at least one feeder fiber for receiving one or more signals from said central office and/or an optical line terminal;
a plurality of output units which are to be connected to respective distribution fibers of said optical distribution network, said distribution fibers being connected to respective optical nodes forming leaf nodes in said optical distribution network;
a splitting unit for distributing said one or more signals to said plurality of output units; said remote node further comprising
an additional signal path connecting one of said output units to the input unit of said remote node to enable said remote node to transmit an optical waveband from a first leaf node connected to said optical distribution network through said input unit and said splitting unit to other leave nodes attached to said optical distribution network.
In this manner there is provided an efficient way of distributing a signal (e.g. a “protection signal” which e.g. due to some connection failure cannot be received form the central office) which was received from a different distribution tree to the distribution tree where the connection failure occurs.
According to one embodiment the optical distribution further comprises one or more of the following:
said additional signal path comprises a first waveband demultiplexer connected to said first leaf node for demultiplexing the optical waveband received from said first leaf node; and/or
said signal path comprises a waveband multiplexer connected to said input unit through which said distribution tree receives the signals to be distributed to the nodes of said optical distribution tree, said waveband multiplexer being adapted for multiplexing said optical waveband onto said input unit.
By using a first waveband demultiplexer in said signal path it becomes possible to extract the signal which may have been received by the first leave node (such as e.g. a base station) from the leaf node of another distribution tree (a basestation connected to the other optical distribution network, and the demultiplexed signal can then be fed to the input unit of the remote node so that it can be forwarded to the other leaf nodes of said (first) optical distribution network.
By—additionally or alternatively—using a (further) waveband multiplexer in said signal path which is connected to the input unit it becomes possible to feed the signal which is to be distributed to the other leaf nodes and which may have been received from another distribution tree into said (first) distribution tree so that it can be forwarded to the other leaf nodes.
According to one embodiment said remote node comprises a (power) splitter unit connected to said input unit for splitting the one or more signals received from the input unit and for distributing them to the leaf nodes of said distribution tree, or
said remote node comprises a wavelength demultiplexer, such as an arrayed waveguide grating, for distributing the one or more signals received from the input unit to the leaf nodes of said distribution tree.
Using a splitting unit is a suitable implementation for a case where the system is a time-division multiplexing PON.
On the other hand, using a wavelength demultiplexer is a suitable implementation for a case where the system is a WDM PON. In case of an arrayed waveguide grating being used as a wavelength demultiplexer, it is not necessary to have a separate multiplexer for feeding the signal which is to be distributed to the other leaves, since this signal may be fed to a separate input provided by the arrayed waveguide grating. The “input unit” therefore in this case may comprise the inputs of the arrayed waveguide grating.
However, if a splitter is used for distributing the signal to the other leaves, then it may be necessary to multiplex the signal which is to be distributed from one leaf to the other leaves by a multiplexer so that it is distributed by the splitter to the other leaf nodes.
According to one embodiment the said remote node is adapted such that the optical waveband is transmitted upstream towards said demultiplexer where said optical waveband is split off from the remaining signal, further transmitted to said multiplexer and from there fed downstream towards said splitter to be distributed to the other nodes of said distribution tree.
Alternatively said optical waveband is transmitted directly from said first leaf node via a dedicated cable and without need for demultiplexing to said input unit.
This is an efficient implementation of the signal path for distributing the signal received form a different distribution tree. In one alternative a demultiplexer is used to extract the signal which may be received from another basestation, and the multiplexer is then used to feed it into the downstream signal path so that it can be forwarded to the other leaves of said distribution tree, e.g. by a splitter or a wavelength multiplexer.
In another alternative there may be provided a dedicated cable or link to forward the optical waveband from the leave node to the input unit of the optical distribution tree.
According to one embodiment said first leaf node is a first base station which is connected via a link to a second base station connected to another optical distribution network;
said optical waveband is an optical signal which is received by said first leaf node being a first base station from said lead node connected to a different optical distribution network being a second base station and then transmitted from
said first base station via said signal path, preferably said demultiplexer, said multiplexer and said splitter, to the other optical nodes of said distribution tree, where one or more of said other optical nodes are third base stations.
This is an advantageous implementation where the apparatus can be used to protect base stations against a connection failure.
According to one embodiment said first base station strips off its own wavelength of the optical waveband and forwards the remaining part of the optical waveband to said demultiplexer.
This allows the basestation to decode the optical signal.
According to one embodiment wherein the optical waveband received from said first leaf node comprises a waveband, preferably carrying a protection signal which has been received by said first leaf node from a leaf node connected to a different optical distribution network, said remote node further comprising:
a filter located between said splitter and said first base station for filtering the waveband of said protection signal.
In this manner a collision of the protection waveband received from the different distribution tree and transmitted with the same signal being transmitted downstream after having been fed into the downstream path can be avoided.
According to one embodiment said demultiplexer is a multiplexer/demultiplexer;
said multiplexer is a multiplexer/demultiplexer;
said remote node being adapted such that signals from said third base stations attached to said optical distribution network are transmitted upstream, demultiplexed by a multiplexer/demultiplexer comprised by said input unit, are forwarded to a multiplexer/demultiplexer connected to said first leaf node and forwarded via said multiplexer/demultiplexer towards said first leaf node, transmitted from said first leaf node to said second leaf node, and forwarded from said second leaf node towards an central office or an optical line terminal.
This is a suitable and advantageous implementation of the signal path in the upstream for protecting against a connection failure.
According to one embodiment said optical waveband is a protection signal which is transmitted via said second leaf node, the link between said second and said first leaf node, said demultiplexer, said multiplexer and said splitter towards the other leaf nodes attached to said optical distribution network to avoid a failure of the nodes attached to said optical distribution network.
In this way a protection against a connection failure can be achieved.
According to one embodiment the remote node or the system for interconnecting nodes comprises one or more of the following:
a module for performing a wavelength conversion of the optical waveband when it is transmitted by either said second leaf node or by said first leaf node;
a detector for detecting a failure in said first distribution tree and for triggering the transmission of said optical waveband via a leaf of said second distribution tree to said first distribution tree.
In this manner a suitable generation of the protection signal and its transmission to the distribution tree where the failure occurred via a different distribution tree can be implemented.
According to one embodiment there is provided an integrated system which comprises a system for interconnecting one or more nodes according to one of the embodiments and an apparatus for transmitting an optical waveband according to one of the embodiments.
The present invention will now be described by means of exemplary embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings.
First of all, before explaining embodiments of the invention, the terms which are used in the following description are explained in connection with
A central office (which may comprise an optical line terminal OLT and a mobile network operator) is connected to a plurality of nodes (in
The term optical distribution network (ODN) in the following refers to the combination of remote node, feeder fiber and distribution fibers. The term remote node refers to a unit which is connected between the feeder fiber and the distribution fibers and which comprises an input unit for being connected to the feeder fiber, a splitter and a plurality of outputs for being respectively connected to the distribution fibers. The ODN therefore forms a tree structure by which the signal which is received from the central office is branched to a plurality of (leaf) nodes.
The optical distribution network (ODN) together with the nodes connected to the distribution fibers and the central office and/or the optical line terminal forms a passive optical network (PON).
Such a remote node according to one embodiment is modified by further comprising a signal path for transmitting an optical waveband from a first leaf node connected to said optical distribution network through said input unit and said splitting unit to other leave nodes attached to said optical distribution network.
This may be implemented in one embodiment by a signal path for transmitting an optical waveband which is received by one of said output units from a first leaf node connected to said optical distribution network to said input unit of the remote node and from there through the splitting unit to the other leave nodes connected to said optical distribution network. This is schematically illustrated in
The remote node according to such an embodiment may be used in a system for interconnecting nodes which are connected to different distribution trees of a passive optical network.
This will now be explained in somewhat more detail in connection with
The optical distribution networks receive the signals from both providers or a central office and distribute them—via a remote node comprising as e.g. a splitter or splitting unit illustrated as a square—to their leaf nodes which comprise “normal” fixed network optical nodes and are illustrated as hexagons and which further comprise basestations illustrated as antennas in
Assuming that the left-hand distribution tree has some failure, e.g. due to a connection failure between the central office and the remote node. This would mean that not only the normal optical nodes are disconnected but also the basestations which may each have connected thereto quite a number of terminals.
To avoid such a negative effect, there is provided a “protection link” between a basestation connected to the right-hand side optical distribution network and a basestation connected to the left-hand side optical distribution network. In this manner the left-hand-side distribution tree and the right-hand-side distribution tree are connected.
The signal which is intended to be sent from the mobile network operator to the left-hand distribution tree is then instead sent as a “protection signal” to the right-hand-side distribution tree. Via the base station of the right-hand-side distribution tree and the protection link it is then forwarded to the basestation at the left-hand-side distribution tree.
In this manner the protection signal reaches the left-hand-side distribution tree despite the connection failure.
However, in order not to reach only one basestation of the left-hand-side distribution tree, according to one embodiment the protection signal is then forwarded also to the other basestations of the left-hand-side distribution tree. For that purpose there is according to one embodiment provided some modification of the “remote node” of the optical distribution network of this distribution tree. This is illustrated in
By providing this additional signal path which enables the forwarding of a signal from one leaf of the distribution tree to the other leaves of the distribution tree it becomes possible to compensate for a failure in the trunk (feeder) fiber. This is achieved in one embodiment by routing the signal intended for the leaves on the left-hand-side optical distribution networks through the right-hand-side optical distribution network, from there via the basestation and the protection link to the basestation connected to the left-hand-side optical distribution network, and then via the additional signal path and the distribution unit to the other leaves of the left-hand-side optical distribution network.
According to one embodiment the modification relates to the remote node which in this embodiment comprises a “splitter” and which is illustrated as square in
The embodiment illustrated in
A further modification of the embodiment shown in
Further embodiments of the invention will now be described in the following.
According to one embodiment there is proposed a system architecture to combine protected and unprotected nodes on the same fiber plant for sharing the last mile access network between a mobile and a fixed operator. The proposed approach provides resiliency and fault protection for the basestations on top of the unprotected network that the fixed operator needs to attach its customers. The result is a cheap, unprotected network for the fixed operator and a more complicated but protected network for the mobile operator running on the same physical fibers in parallel. This should be achieved with minimal new fiber deployment as trenching ducts for new fibers can cost several 10,000 US$ per kilometre and is the main cost block of access networks.
The application scenario of an embodiment of the invention is the sharing of the fiber access network between a fixed operator and a mobile operator: the mobile operator uses the fiber-to-the-home (FFTH) infrastructure of the fixed operator to backhaul its base stations.
Current FTTH-systems are deployed as passive optical networks (PONs) in a tree topology using an optical distribution network. A fault like a fiber cut can thus disconnect some or all nodes attached to the tree. The goal of this invention is to protect basestations from such faults in this scenario.
To this end, according to one embodiment there are combined two FTTH-trees for mutual protection. Existing schemes that follow this idea establish the protection connection between the tree's branching points. In the embodiment of the invention however, the protection signal is exchanged between two leafs of the trees.
This has a number of advantages, especially if the protection should be added to an already deployed infrastructure. First of all, a FTTH-tree has only one branching point but between 32 and 128 leafs. Thus, there are many more possible connection points, allowing for shorter and thus cheaper links. Furthermore, the protection link can be realized wirelessly as the basestations are powered and at elevated positions. In contrast, branching points are unpowered and often installed underground.
According to one embodiment there are two adjacent fiber trees that provide the fixed operator with two sets of unprotected ONUs and adds the base stations to these trees. The trees are used for mutual protection and the link between the two trees is established between one basestation in the first and a second basestation in the second tree. The protection signal for nodes on the second tree is transmitted from the central office to the first basestation, forwarded to the second basestation and then distributed by the second basestation in the second tree. To enable this distribution, the remote node is modified such that the second basestation can transmit to and receive signals from all other basestations in the same tree. Protection for the first tree is not presented here to simplify explanation. However, the skilled person readily recognizes that it can be provided by mirroring the second tree configuration.
The embodiment solves the problem to support two types of nodes on the same fiber infrastructure: cheap, unprotected nodes with low, varying bandwidth requirements for the fixed operator and more expensive, protected basestations with high-volume, steady traffic for the mobile operator.
One advantage of embodiments of the invention is lower costs for the wired connection of basestations. It can reduce the amount of newly deployed fiber and thus avoids the CAPEX for this deployment. It does this through sharing the fiber infrastructure with a standard FTTH system while fulfilling the protection requirements of basestations. It helps to bridge the gap between the two different requirement sets: low-cost unprotected end user links for FTTH in contrast to higher-cost and protected links to basestations for the mobile operator.
In contrast to existing solutions that can be modified to support the sharing scenario (e.g. type D protection (ITU-T, 2004) and the solution of Son et. al. (Son, Han, Lee, & Chung, 2005)), the link to transmit the protection signals is established between the leafs in two fiber trees. As there are many more leafs than remote nodes and these leafs are geographically distributed, there are many more connection possibilities. This results in less distance that has to be bridged by the link and thus less money to be spent on it. Furthermore, it is the unique feature of this invention that the protection link can be easily realized with a wireless link, thus avoiding civil engineering altogether.
Further embodiments of the invention will be described in the following in somewhat more detail.
According to one embodiment there are combined two adjacent fiber trees to provide protection for each other. In contrast to existing schemes, the link between the trees is established between two leafs of the two fiber trees. To distribute the protection signal in the trees, the remote node is modified accordingly.
The same system as shown in
The protection signal is transmitted from the central office (CO, in the Figure labelled Mobile operator) in a third waveband over the second fiber tree towards the third basestation on the second fiber tree. The “protection signal” is the signal which is actually intended for the first distribution tree but cannot be sent to its nodes due to a connection failure. Instead, the signal is transmitted as “protection signal”, possibly via a different waveband, here the third waveband, to and through the second distribution tree. The signal is transmitted towards the third basestation and, not illustrated in
To transmit a protection signal in the upstream, the first basestation uses a lambda in the fourth waveband as well and transmits it via its distribution fiber towards the remote node. After passing the passive splitter (that serves as combiner in the upstream), the fourth waveband passes the second waveband (de-) multiplexer. It is split off and transmitted to the first waveband (de-) multiplexer and then forwarded via the distribution fiber to the second basestation. This basestation then transmits the protection signal (probably together with its own upstream protection wavelength) via the protection link towards the third basestation. Also here, a wavelength translation is performed towards the third waveband. The third basestation then transmits the third waveband towards the central office via the normal path along the second fiber tree. The complete protection scheme for both fiber trees is shown in
It should be noted that the protection link between the second and the third basestation can also be established wirelessly as shown in
In the proposed protection scheme according to the described embodiments, all basestations are protected from a feeder fiber cut. Furthermore, the basestations that implement the protection link (in the example the second and the third basestation) are protected from a cut of their distribution fiber and from a damage of the remote node, as they are dual homed via the protection link.
While the present invention has been described by exemplary embodiments, it will be understood that these embodiments may be modified without departing form the scope of the claims. For example, the use of the link between basestations of different distribution trees has been explained in connection with the purpose to obtain a protection against a connection failure. However, since the proposed configuration in fact adds a further signal distribution path, another purpose or effect which may be achieved with this configuration is to increase the capacity or the bandwidth. This can e.g. be useful if there is network congestion. Then the further signal distribution path can be used to circumvent the congestion. Alternatively the further distribution path may be used to transport low priority or best effort traffic.
Furthermore, it will be readily understood that while the embodiments described herein before explain only the connection between two distribution trees by connecting their leave node through a link, it is also possible to connect more than two such distribution trees. For example, the protection signal may be transmitted from the first base station of a first distribution tree to a second base station of a second distribution tree and from there to a third base station of a third distribution tree. In such a case the second distribution tree (or its second base station) which is connecting the first and the third distribution trees (or the first and third base stations) may be regarded as forming a “link” which interconnects the first and third base stations in order to transmit the protection signal.
As a matter of course, even more than three distribution trees may be connected in an analogous manner.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11182745.7 | Sep 2011 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2012/068975 | 9/26/2012 | WO | 00 | 3/26/2014 |
