The present invention relates to shelving and product display and a system for aiding in determining the inventory on the shelf in a retail store.
A major cost in the operation of retail stores relates to inventory management, which includes the tracking and storing of inventory. A significant portion of this cost relates to product inventory management in the selling area of the store. A considerable portion of this inventory management cost is the periodic counting of product on the store shelves. This counting is necessary to determine the amount of product on the shelf and to help ensure the shelves are fully stocked.
Historically, the counting of inventory on store shelves was done manually and the results were recorded on paper. More recently, however, inventory has been counted manually with the use of a small hand-held computer that can be configured to transmit the entered data to a central computer that compiles data and can be programmed to make decisions regarding the purchase of products for restocking the shelves. These recent advances have helped reduce the cost of inventory management but counting inventory still requires significant manual labor. It would be beneficial to reduce the amount of manual labor required to count the inventory.
Another significant cost relating to inventory management is product theft. Certain items are relatively small but represent a high value to potential thieves who can either resell the items or use them for other illegitimate purposes, as in the case of certain pharmaceutical products. The losses generated by such thefts have a negative impact on the profitability of the retail stores.
Theft can be the result of both customers and employees actions and has been difficult to eliminate. Attempts to deter and prevent theft have proven to be only partially effective. For instance, in-store cameras often do not observe the theft clearly enough to catch or prosecute the thief. In addition, in-store security personnel are rarely in the correct position to actually observe a thief in action. As a result, theft continues to be a significant problem and cost in the management of inventory. It would be beneficial to provide aid in monitoring for theft.
Currently, retail stores can track the amount of product sold based on a number of items scanned at the checkout counter. While this ability has proven useful, certain inherent disadvantages result from the use of such a system. One inherent disadvantage is that the scanner only counts the number of products that are legitimately purchased. Therefore, if product is removed from the shelf but not purchased, the store is unable to determine the fact that product has been misplaced or stolen without visual inspection or detection. It would be useful to compare changes in product level on the shelves with the amount of product sold.
A second inherent disadvantage relates to store-run product promotions. A typical promotion will have a product located at the end of an aisle or in some type of promotional location that increase customer awareness of the product. Usually the product is also placed on the shelf in its traditional location so that customers familiar with the product placement of the store can find the product without undue searching. Therefore, customers can obtain the product being promoted in multiple places and it can be difficult to determine the effectiveness of a particular promotional display, i.e., the effect of a promotional discount offered for the product versus the normal purchasing of the product. It would be beneficial to more accurately determine the effectiveness of in-store promotions.
Another major cost of inventory management is associated with having to maintain more inventory in the store then is actually needed to meet customer demand. As current systems of inventory do not automatically indicate that a shelf is empty, retail stores tend to rely on output measured through the checkout or, alternatively, through visual inspection to determine if additional product needs to be placed on the shelf. In order to ensure the shelves are stocked with product, often more product than is typically needed for a given period of time will be placed on the shelf, sometimes in multiple facings on each shelf. The use of multiple facings tends to take up valuable shelf space that could otherwise be allocated towards additional product choices so as to maximize consumer satisfaction. It would be beneficial to reduce the amount of inventory of a particular product in the retail store.
Methods of minimizing the amount of required shelf space are known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,720 to Hardy and U.S. Pat. No. 4,830,201 to Breslow, which are incorporated by reference in their entirety, teach a system for organizing and displaying items on a shelf through the use of a pusher assembly. While these systems are effective at moving items on a shelf from the back to the front of the shelf, the systems do not provide notification that a shelf is empty. Additionally, if multiple facings are being used for a single product, an uneven usage of the facings can result. If one facing of product is depleted before the other facings of the same product, the shelf will have a gap that provides a less satisfactory appearance to the consumer. This can happen even when ample product is still available. It would be beneficial to indicate to store personnel that shelves require adjustment so as to maintain a more satisfactory product appearance.
The above deficiencies and drawbacks known in the art are overcome by the present invention.
An embodiment of the present invention includes a system for detecting and communicating the position of a pusher assembly on a shelf that comprises: a rear reflector strip; a control module with a microcomputer; and a laser assembly comprising a laser scanner. The laser scanner may be configured to transmit a laser beam to a rotating mirror, wherein the rotating mirror directs the laser beam to a mirrored reflective surface located along the length of the rear reflector strip. The mirrored reflective surface may also comprise a plurality of angled mirror sections that are configured to reflect the laser beam to the pusher assembly. The plurality of angled mirror sections may have a piece-wise linear approximation of a parabola. Additionally, the mirrored reflective surface may include a plurality of flat sections located at the leading edge of each angled mirror section, with the plurality of flat sections configured to retro-reflect the laser beam back to the laser scanner. The control module may analyze the laser beam at the laser scanner and/or the angular location of the rotating mirror to detect the position of the pusher assembly on the shelf.
Another embodiment of the present invention includes a system for detecting and communicating the position of a pusher assembly on a shelf that comprises: a control module with a microcomputer and a light assembly. The light assembly may include a light transceiver located within a channel and behind the pusher assembly. The light transceiver may transmit a light signal to the pusher assembly. The light transceiver may receive the light signal reflected from the pusher assembly. Additionally, the microcomputer may analyze the light signal to determine the position of the pusher assembly on the shelf.
Another embodiment of the present invention includes a system for aiding in the prevention of theft of inventory that comprises: a laser assembly associated with a pusher assembly for transmitting data relating to the movement of the pusher assembly; and a store computer configured to receive the data and to transmit a signal in response to the data. The laser assembly may include: a rear reflector strip; a control module with a microcomputer; and a laser scanner configured to transmit a laser beam to a rotating mirror and the rotating mirror directing the laser beam to a segmented mirrored reflective surface located along the length of the rear reflector strip. The segmented mirrored reflective surface may include a plurality of angled mirror sections configured to reflect the laser beam to the pusher assembly and a plurality of flat sections configured to retro-reflect the laser beam back to the laser scanner. The plurality of flat sections may be located at the leading edge of each angled mirror section, the plurality of flat sections. Additionally, the microcomputer may analyze the laser beam at the laser scanner and the angular location of the rotating mirror to detect the position of the pusher assembly on the shelf. Additionally, the system may further include a security camera configured to respond to the signal, with the response including focusing in the direction of the laser assembly. The store computer may be further configured to provide a notification that a deviation in the typical movement of the pusher assembly has occurred.
Several embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of example, but are not limited to the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
Before the embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including” and “comprising” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items and equivalents thereof.
The present invention may be used with the shelf and pusher assembly system described in either U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,720 to Hardy or U.S. Pat. No. 4,830,201 to Breslow. The present invention may also be used with other pusher assemblies and shelf configurations known in the art.
As depicted
The indicia strip 21 is depicted in
The representations in the pattern contained on the indicia strip 21 can be optically readable or can be read based on other methods, including but not limited to passive variable capacitance, inductance, resistance, or magnetic, or active signal detection.
In another alternative embodiment, the sensor assembly 30 may be mounted within or on the pusher 25 and configured to read the indicia strip 21. In this embodiment, the indicia strip 21 is not mounted to or part of the coil spring; rather, the indicia strip 21 may be positioned along the top of the floor 24 or along the underside of the floor 24 and is read by the sensor assembly 30. In one aspect of this embodiment, the indicia strip 21 is of the type that may have variable magnetic or capacitive characteristics. The sensor assembly 30 may incorporate an analog oscillator whose frequency is determined by the magnetism or capacitance of the indicia strip 21 at the particular position of the pusher 25. The oscillator can directly modulate the radio frequency signal and send that signal to a central access point, as discussed below. The central access point can then demodulate the signal and use the signal to determine the position of the pusher 25.
For a black/white printed indicia strip 21, an optical infrared or visible light LED retro-reflective sensor array can be used. In an embodiment, the indicia strip 21 pattern containing the various representations could be 6 bits wide. In an alternative embodiment, depending on the width of the shelf and the desired precision, the pattern on the indicia strip could be more than 6 bits wide.
In yet another alternative embodiment, the indicia strip 21 could be less than 6 bits wide. Reducing the number of bits on the indicia strip 21 reduces the precision regarding the position of the pusher 25 but has the advantage of potentially avoiding the need to determine the dimension of the product. An embodiment with a reduced number of bits will be discussed below. The indicia strip will preferably include at least two representations so that the two representations can be used to reflect at least two positions of the pusher.
Depending on the indicia strip 21 and the sensor assembly 30, the number of measurable positions of the pusher 25 can be varied. For example, a configuration of a 6 bit wide pattern on an indicia strip 21 with a sensor assembly 30 that can scan 6 bits could scan at least 64 representations associated with 64 positions of the pusher 25. The representations in the pattern on the indicia strip 21 can be in many symbologies but a Gray Code provides that only one bit will change in each increment of movement, reducing potential errors. The sensor assembly 30 and the indicia strip 21 can be configured depending on the distance of travel of the pusher 25 and the expected size of the product.
In an embodiment, the coil spring 20 has a width of about 1 inch and the indicia strip 21 covers approximately 80% of the width of the coil spring 20. One skilled in the art will understand that other widths of the coil spring 20, and other dimensions of the indicia strip 21 are possible with the invention.
In an embodiment, the number of products on the shelf could be measured by the number of measurable positions of pusher 25. In such an embodiment, the position of the pusher 25 could be used to determine the amount of product on the shelf without the need to manually count the product. In an alternative embodiment, the number of measurable positions could exceed the number of products that can be placed in a facing. In this alternative embodiment, it would be preferable to have the number of measurable positions be an integer multiple of the number of products for ease of calculating the amount of product on the shelf. Increasing the number of measurable positions can therefore improve the ability of the system to precisely calculate the amount of product in a facing. This can become more important when a product package is unusually thin and therefore the incremental movement of the pusher 25 from one code to the next becomes a large percentage of the thickness of each product package that it is pushing.
Thus, as different products have different dimensions, a configuration of the sensor assembly 30 and indicia strip 21 might be desired with an increased number of measurable positions. For example, a configuration where 256 positions of the pusher 25 are measured might be desirable. Such a configuration could be used to determine the actual number of product on the shelf for a wide variety of product dimensions.
In an alternative embodiment, the sensor assembly 30 and indicia strip 21 can be configured to provide a decreased number of measurable positions. In an embodiment, four positions of the pusher 25 are measurable. In such a configuration, the shelf would provide information regarding how full the shelf was but would not provide the actual quantity of items on the shelf (assuming that 4 products would not fill the facing). This configuration could be useful in providing an automatic notification that a shelf was running out of product and needed to be restocked without the need to determine the product dimensions.
For a black/white printed indicia strip 21, the sensor 50 can include, but is not limited to, an optical infrared or visible light LED retro-reflective sensor. Preferably, for a 6 bit wide pattern, a linear array of 6 emitters/sensors will be used where one emitter/sensor is aligned with each bit position printed on the indicia strip 21. In an embodiment, the sensor 50 is positioned approximately 0.1 inches from the surface of the printed strip mounted on the indicia strip 21. As each emitter/sensor pair illuminates its bit position, a binary code can be assembled by the controller 55 that corresponds to the representation on the indicia strip 21, the representation associated with a position of the pusher 25.
Regardless of how the position of the pusher 25 is determined, the controller 55 generates a pusher code that represents the position of the pusher 25. The pusher code can be in digital or analog form and reflects the position of the pusher 25. In addition, the pusher code can be processed data or unprocessed data. Thus, the pusher code can be, but is not limited to, the scanned representation or a controller processed representation. Alternatively, the pusher code can be some other data that reflects the relative position of the pusher 25.
The controller 55 is powered by a power source 75. The power source 75 can be, but is not limited to, a long life battery, a wired power supply, or a solar panel. As can be appreciated, the type of power supply will have an impact on the functionality of the sensor assembly 30. If the power source 75 is a long life battery, a system configuration designed to utilize less energy will be preferable to avoid the need to change the battery on a frequent basis. If the power source 75 is a wired power source, the sensor 50 can be used more frequently without the need to replenish the power supply and the sensor assembly 30 can even be configured to provide real time information.
The controller 55 can be manufactured with a unique serial number. In this embodiment, each pusher 25 would be associated with a unique serial number or identity code. Alternatively, each indicia strip 21 can include a unique identity code along with the representation associated with the position of the pusher 25. Encoding the indicia strip 21 with a unique identity code can reduce the complexity of the controller 55 but typically will result in increased complexity of the sensor 50. Regardless, when the information is transmitted from the sensor assembly 30, the information may include an identity code and the pusher code representative of the pusher 25 position. In addition, information such as time of sending and the status of the circuitry or the status of the power source may also be transmitted.
In this embodiment, an input signal is provided to the controller 155. The input signal can be a signal generated by the timing device 170 or can be from some other source. The controller 155, in response, activates the sensor 150 by sending a signal to the power management circuit 148. The controller 155 receives data from the sensor 150 which is used to form the pusher code representative of the position of the pusher 25. The controller 155 compares the data scanned by the sensor 150 with the previous data scanned by the sensor 150, which is data residing in the memory 156. Depending on the configuration of the system, if the data scanned by the sensor 150 is the same as the previous scanned data, the controller 155 can be configured to wait until the end of the next interval of the timer. If the data scanned by the sensor 150 is different, the controller 155 can then activate the communication control 157 and provide the pusher code to the communication control 157 for transmission. The communication control 157 can then transmit the pusher code for further processing. The terms “transmit” and “transmission,” unless otherwise specified, include sending of information over a wire or via a wireless system and can be direct or indirect (i.e. through a network). If the power source 175 is not a wired power supply, however, it is preferable to use a method of communication that consumes relatively little power.
In general, the power required to transmit wireless signals increases as the transmission distance increases. Thus, especially with a battery powered controller, the preferred wireless communication configuration will transmit low powered signals over a short distance. As depicted in
In an alternative embodiment, the controller 55 corresponding to each pusher 25 can be hard-wired to an access point 80 so that the controller 55 transmits the data to access point 80 over one or more wires. The access point 80 can then transmit the data to the store computer 90. In another alternative embodiment, the data is transmitted directly from the sensor assembly 30 to the store computer 90. In this embodiment, the transmission can be either wireless, such as an infrared, ultrasonic or electromagnetic wave transmission, or can be hard-wired. Depending on the method of transmission, it may be desirable to transmit the data from the sensor assembly 30 to the store computer 90 via a network protocol that can compensate for, or minimize, communication errors.
The use of a wired connection can provide a useful source of power and can reduce the possibility of communication collisions, especially if the signals are directly to the store computer 90. In addition, by providing additional power, the controller 55 can be configured to provide a real time update on the level of product on the shelf or in the store so that more accurate decisions regarding the need to order additional product can be made. This configuration also makes it possible to recognize and send alerts regarding potential theft situations based on the real-time movement of the pusher 25. The real time product information may make it possible to provide a more responsive inventory system so as to lower the amount of inventory in the store and therefore reduce the cost of inventory.
Wireless systems, on the other hand, provide increased flexibility in installation and can be readily installed in existing shelves without the need to install wires for either power or communication. In addition, the use of a wireless system allows for the gradual installation of an inventory system. For example, items of high value (and therefore suffering from an increased likelihood of being stolen) or items that tend to have significant variations in customer demand can be monitored first.
In an embodiment, the sensor assemblies 30 may be networked together via a series of wireless access points 80 where each access point 80 accepts transmissions from any sensor assembly 30 in the vicinity of the access point 80. Thus, in an embodiment, there exist a number of wireless access points 80 and the access points 80 are connected via a network, where the network transmits the data to the store computer 90. In an alternative embodiment, each wireless access point 80 transmits the data directly to the store computer 90.
Naturally, some combination of network and direct transmission is also possible and is considered within the scope of the present invention. For example, a battery powered sensor assembly 30 could communicate via a low powered wireless transmission to an access point 80, the access point 80 being powered by a wired power supply. The access point would transmit a wireless signal to a central access point 85 that was powered by a wired power supply. The central access point 85 could be connected via a wire to the store computer 90.
Referring back to
In an alternative embodiment, the sensor 50 continuously monitors the indicia strip 21. When a product is removed from the shelf, the pusher 25 will move and the sensor 50 can scan a new representation on the indicia strip 21 corresponding to the new position of the pusher 25. The controller 55 can then send a transmission including the new position of the pusher 25 to the store computer 90 (i.e. the controller 55 can send a new pusher code). In this alternative embodiment, the store computer 90 can monitor the amount of product on the shelf in real time.
As depicted in
For example, the store computer 90 could query a particular controller 55 about the position of the associated pusher 25. The controller 55 could activate the sensor 50 in response to the query and determine a pusher code reflecting the position of the pusher 25. The controller 55 could then transmit the pusher code along with the identity code of the controller 55 to the store computer 90. Based on the pusher code, the store computer 90 could determine the inventory level of a product. To avoid activating the wrong controller 55, the store computer 90 could include the identifying code in the transmission. The store computer 90 may store, access, and perform functions with the identifying codes of all or a subset of the controllers or pusher systems in the store.
In an embodiment, all the controllers 55 associated with products purchased from the same vendor could be queried just before the order to the respective vendor was placed. The order to that vendor could then be updated with the latest product inventory information. In this manner, the order placed to the vendor could be made more accurate without the need for laborious counting of products on the shelf.
Some vendors are responsible for stocking the shelves in a retail store instead of the store personnel. In a situation where a vendor was responsible for stocking the shelves, an embodiment of the present invention could provide the vendor with updates in response to queries from the vendor's computer. In an embodiment, the vendor could track the amount of product available on the shelves as frequently as desired, even in real time.
For example, a vendor could send a query to a controller 55 via a wide area network (“WAN”). The controller 55 could determine the position of the pusher 25 and transmit a signal back to the vendor via the WAN. In an alternative embodiment, the vendor could communicate with the store computer 90 to obtain information regarding the inventory level of products on the shelf.
In an embodiment, the vendor could control the manufacturing process of the product in response to inventory levels on the shelves. As can be appreciated, the vendor would have an increasingly effective inventory system if multiple stores were networked to the vendor's computer so that the aggregate amount of product on all the store shelves could be determined. If the vendor was only connected to a single store, the information, while less indicative of the total inventory, could provide valuable details regarding patterns of behavior of the consumers.
Information from the security camera could be sent to a television or other visual display device that is located near the location where the potential theft is occurring. The visual display device could display an image of the potential thief such that the potential thief could appreciate the fact that the thief was being watched.
As can be appreciated, the controller 155 preferably monitors the position of pusher 25 on a frequent or even real time basis so as to provide a more timely response. If a power source 75 consisting of a long life battery is utilized, it may be beneficial to utilize a controller that can determine a potential theft situation without the need to transmit data to the store computer 190. In such an embodiment, the controller can be configured to transmit data to provide inventory level updates and also to provide security notifications.
As can be appreciated, the position of the potential theft relative to the security camera 195 would be beneficial to provide an instruction to the security camera 195 to focus on a particular position. This positional information could be generated by a number of methods, including providing the store computer 190 with the security camera coordinate system for the security camera 195. The position of the controller 155 relative to the security camera 195 could be determined during setup and during a potential theft situation; the position of the controller 155 could be used to direct the focus of the security camera 195. Alternatively, the security camera 195 could be configured to focus in several positions, such as three points along an aisle, and the store computer 190 could indicate which position was the most appropriate for the particular situation. The described methods are illustrative because of the numerous methods of controlling the security camera 195 that exist.
In an embodiment with a two-way transmission between the store computer 190 and the controller 155, the store computer 190 could signal to the controller 155 to activate a device capable of providing an audible warning tone.
In another embodiment, the controller 155 could determine that a potential theft had occurred and could provide a notification, including the sounding of an audible warning tone. In addition, the controller 155 could transmit a signal to the store computer 190. In this alternative embodiment, the sensor assembly 30 would preferably include a timing device 70 so as to allow the controller 155 to more readily determine whether the rate of movement of pusher 25 exceeds a preset level.
In another embodiment, a two-tiered response could be implemented. If the change in position of the pusher 25 was greater than normal, a signal could be transmitted to the security camera 195. In addition, an inaudible notification could be provided directly to security personnel. If the positional change of the pusher 25 more clearly indicated a potential theft, an audible alarm and flashing lights could also be activated. Thus, the response could be configured to more carefully match the situation.
In step 410, the sensor 50 scans the representation contained in the pattern on the indicia strip 21 so that the controller 55 can generate the pusher code representative of the position of the pusher 25. In step 415, the controller 55 generates the pusher code in response to the pattern scanned by the sensor 50. In step 420, the controller 55 transmits a signal that can include the unique serial number of the controller 55 and the pusher code, to the store computer 90.
Next, in step 430, the store computer 90 receives the data from the controller 55. In an embodiment, the transfer of data from the controller 55 to the store computer 90 is direct. In another embodiment, the controller 55 transmits data to the store computer 90 indirectly through an access point or a network.
Then, in step 440, the store computer 90 calculates the amount of product on the shelf based on the position of the pusher 25. The store computer 90 also updates the inventory list at this point. In an embodiment where multiple facings have the same product, the total amount of product on all of the facings that have that product can be calculated. In an embodiment, the calculation of product in a facing can be accomplished through the use of a database of products and the relevant dimensions of a product, and the position of the pusher. In another embodiment, the number of products placed in the facing can be provided during setup of the controller 55 for that product. The position of the pusher 25 and the number of products corresponding to that position of the pusher 25 can be used to calculate the quantity of remaining products based on a later position of the pusher 25 through the use of well known extrapolation techniques.
In another embodiment, the position of the pusher 25 can be one of four positions representing X>¾, ¾≥X>½, ½≥X>¼, and X≤¼. This latter embodiment provides less precise information but also requires less computation effort to provide the approximate inventory level. In addition, this embodiment can be used to manage inventory without the need to determine and track the dimension of the product. In an embodiment, the amount product on the shelf can be roughly determined based the number of facings containing the product and whether the pusher 25 for each facing is in a position representative of a full, mostly full, low or almost empty facing.
In step 450, the store computer 90 determines whether any action is required. In an embodiment, a potential theft, a decrease in the inventory below a pre-set level or the emptying of a facing of product while ample product still remains on the shelf in other facings would indicate that some action was required. For example, the store computer 90 could determine that, based on historical usage and the average delivery time and the cost per delivery, the current level of inventory was low. In an alternative embodiment, the minimum inventory level could be preset and once the inventory level drops below a preset level, the store computer 90 could determine that the product level was low.
In step 460, the store computer 90 would determine if a potential theft was taking place. In an embodiment, the store computer 90 could compare the current level of inventory, based on the position of the pusher 25, to the previous level of inventory. If the rate of change in inventory level exceeded a preset level, the store computer 90 would determine that a potential theft was taking place. In step 465, the store computer 90 would notify security. The notification could include a page to security or a signal to a security camera 195 to focus in a particular direction.
Next, in step 470, the store computer 90 would determine if the existing order needed to be modified. The store computer 90 could compare the current product requirement to the current order. If the store computer 90 determined that an amount of product ordered was insufficient, the store computer 90 would proceed to step 475. In step 475, the store computer 90 would update the current inventory order so that the inventory order matched the current product requirements.
Next, in step 480, the store computer 90 would determine if a facing on a shelf was empty. If there was an empty facing, the store computer 90 would then notify the store management that there was an undesirable empty facing in step 485. The store management could then decide the appropriate action to take depending on the type of product and the availability of substitute goods. If the facing was not empty, the store computer 90 would wait until the next product update.
In step 520, the sensor assembly 30 receives the query from the store computer 90. In response to the query, the controller 55 activates the sensor 50 and prepares to receive data reflecting the position of the pusher 25. In step 530, the sensor 50 scans the indicia strip 21 and the controller 55 generates a pusher code representative of the position of the pusher 25.
In step 540, the sensor assembly 30 transmits the pusher code representative of the position of the pusher 25 along with the unique serial number of the controller 55 to the store computer 90.
Next, the store computer 90 receives this transmission in step 550. This transmission can be sent directly from the sensor assembly 30 to the store computer 90 or, preferably, it can be indirectly through a network. The transmission can be sent in a wireless manner, over wires, or some combination of a wireless and wired transmission.
Then, in step 560, the store computer 90 determines the level of inventory on the shelf. In an embodiment, the determination can be based on the product dimension and the position of the pusher 25. In an alternative embodiment, the determination can be based solely on the position of the pusher 25.
In step 620, a set-up button on a hand-held device is pressed. The hand-held device is configured to transmit a signal to a store computer 90 indicating that the user of the hand-held device is about to associate a product with a serial number or identifying code of a controller 55. Preferably, the transmission of signals between the hand-held device and the store computer 90 is done in a wireless manner. In an embodiment, the store computer 90 provides feedback to the user indicating that the store computer 90 is ready to proceed. In an alternative embodiment, no feedback is provided.
Next, in step 630, the UPC code of the product is scanned and transmitted to the store computer 90. Then, in step 640, the store computer 90 looks up the product dimension based on the UPC code. If the UPC code does not have a listed dimension, the store computer 90 checks if the user can input the needed dimension in step 642. If the user cannot, the setup is terminated and the user can try to setup a new product. If the user can determine the dimension, the user enters the dimension in step 644.
Next, in step 646, a dimension is associated with the UPC code. Then, in step 650 the store computer 90 sends a signal to the hand-held device to indicate that the user should proceed with the setup.
Next, in step 660 the user activates the controller 55 with the hand-held device. In an embodiment, an optical setup sensor is mounted on the pusher assembly and is connected to the controller 55. Preferably, the setup sensor is recessed in the pusher 25 but could be mounted in other locations such as on the top or the side of the pusher 25. The hand-held device will be configured to transmit a signal to the setup sensor. The act of transmitting the setup signal to the setup sensor will cause the controller 55 to awake from a dormant state.
Then in step 670, the controller 55, in response to the setup signal, will send data indicating that the controller 55 is being setup to the store computer 90. The data will include the unique serial number of the controller 55. The data may also include a generic setup code or a setup code corresponding to the hand-held scanner and can include a pusher code representative of the position of the pusher 25. In the event that multiple hand-held devices are being utilized at the same time, it may be beneficial to provide a setup code associated with a particular hand-held device.
Next, in step 680, the store computer 90 will receive the data from the controller 55. If the data includes the pusher code, the store computer 90 can calculate the amount of product in the facing at this time. In step 685, the store computer 90 sends a signal to the hand-held device indicating that the controller 55 has been setup and associated with the UPC code of a particular product. In addition, if the position of the pusher 25 was originally included, the store computer 90 can also provide a calculation of the current quantity of product in the facing that was just set up. In addition, the store computer 90 requests that the user verify that the setup information is correct.
Finally, in step 690, the user indicates the information is correct. Upon verification, the setup for the controller 55 is complete. To change the product associated with the controller 55, the process can be repeated.
In step 720, the hand-held device is used to scan the UPC code of the product and transmit the information to the store computer 90. Next, in step 730, the store computer 90 looks to see if a product dimension is listed for that scanned UPC code. In the event that no dimension is associated with the UPC code, the computer, in step 732, transmits a signal to the hand-held device requesting the user to input the appropriate product dimension.
If the user does not know the product dimension or cannot measure the dimension, the user can cancel the setup and start over with a new product in step 734.
If the user does know the dimension or is able to measure the dimension, the user then enters the dimension and transmits the information to the store computer 90 in step 736. After the product dimension is determined, in step 740, the store computer 90 sends a signal to the hand held device indicating that the user should proceed.
Next, in step 750, the user scans the serial number of the controller 55. Preferably, the serial number of the controller 55 is printed in a black/white code on a sticker mounted to the sensor assembly 30. After scanning the serial number, the hand held device transmits the serial number to the store computer 90.
Then, in step 760, the store computer 90 associates the UPC code of the product with the serial number of the controller 55. The store computer 90 then signals the hand held device that the setup for the device is complete. To avoid potential communication problems during setup, all communications between the hand-held device and the store computer 90 can include a code representing the hand-held device.
In an alternative embodiment, the method of associating a product with a controller 55 could be done without sending a signal to the store computer 90. In this embodiment, the data would be uploaded from the hand-held device once the user had associated the various controllers with the various products.
As can be appreciated, numerous methods of product association with a controller 55 are possible, thus the above methods are illustrative.
A system for determining the location of the pusher with an indicia strip and sensor has been described. Numerous additional methods exist for measuring the distance between the front or rear of a shelf and the pusher or the final product in a facing of products. Based on this distance, and understanding the dimension of the products in the facing, a simple calculation can be performed to determine the number of products in the facing. This calculation can be performed by a microprocessor, store computer, controller or some other processing device which has received the information regarding the distance between the shelf front and the last product in a facing. Moreover, the pusher assembly has been described to include a spring. However, some other biasing method, such as gravity or magnetism, would also work to move the pusher and the product forward.
In an embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in
A corresponding receiver is incorporated into a location that is stationary in relation to the pusher 725. The receiver 712 can be incorporated into a front rail or another location at or near the front of the shelf, a receiver 730 can be incorporated into a rear rail or other location at or near the rear of the shelf, it also can be incorporated into the floor of the shelf, the track of the pusher, the roof of the shelf or the divider wall. The receiver detects the signal that is sent from the transmitter. For example, a LED may radiate light having a particular intensity. A phototransistor acting as a receiver detects the light signals being emitted from the LED. The sensitivity of the phototransistor and the intensity of the LED may be adjusted by the microprocessor in order to adjust the overall sensitivity of the optical components. In an embodiment, the adjustment can be done remotely. Thus, the transmitter can communicate in a wireless fashion with the receiver through RF, IR or other known means such as magnetic fields, electrical fields, sound waves and the like.
The transmitter and receiver may be in communication with a controller that tracks the time of sending and receiving. This data can be provided to a processing device such as a microprocessor or a store computer, thus in this embodiment the pusher code would include the time interval between sending and receiving. Information regarding the time at which the signal was sent and the time at which it was received may be utilized by a processing device to determine the time between the transmission and the receipt of the signal. Based on this length of time, the processing device can calculate the distance between the transmitter and the receiver. Knowing the dimensions of the shelf, the pusher system and the components thereof, this distance can then be translated into the distance between the front side 6 of the shelf and the face of the pusher 25 that is biased against the back of the facing of products. Such a translation is well known and within the knowledge of one of ordinary skill. If the relevant dimension of the products in the facing is known, the processing device can then calculate the number of products in the facing based on the known dimension of the products.
In an alternative embodiment, the transmitter and the receiver switch locations. The transmitter can be placed at or near the front or the rear of the shelf or other relatively stationary position and the receiver can be placed on or near the pusher. In an alternative embodiment, the transmitter and the receiver can be incorporated into the same device which merely bounces a signal off a stationary position. For example, a reflector can be placed on the pusher and a transmitter/receiver using a laser, or some other light source, can determine the distance between the reflector and the transmitter/receiver based on the time of travel. Examples of possible transmitter/receivers include, but are not limited to, optical displacement measurement sensors and reflective laser sensors. As can be appreciated, if a transmitter and a receiver are used to determine distance, it is preferable that the location of either the part that is stationary be located near the front side or the rear side of the shelf so as to make the distance calculation simpler and to avoid problems with symmetric distances on both sides of the stationary unit mounted to the shelf. For example, mounting a transmitter halfway between the front and rear of the shelf would make determining the location of the pusher more complicated because there would be two possible locations for a given distance.
In an embodiment, depicted in
A receiver is located at a position that is fixed in relation to the movement of the pusher 725. The receiver may be a phototransistor and can be located on the front of the shelf 705, such as receiver 710 or on a front rail 708 connected to the front of the shelf, such as receiver 712. The receiver can further be located on the floor of the shelf at any number of positions as represented by 714, on the floor of the pusher track at 716 or at a location above the shelf 705 such as on another shelf (not shown) mounted above the shelf 705. The receiver can be located on the divider wall at 720 or 722 or other location on the divider wall. The receiver also can be located near the rear side 707 at 730 or at 732. Preferably, the receiver will be mounted near the either front side 706 or the rear side 707 so as to make distance calculation simpler.
The receiver and the transmitter can also switch locations. The pusher can incorporate a receiver, and a transmitter can be incorporated at any of the locations 710-732 as well as in any other location that is fixed in relation to the movement of the pusher. Preferably, however, the location of the transmitter will be near either the front side 706 or the rear side 707 so as to make calculation of distance simpler.
In an embodiment, the transmitter is located at 700 and the receiver is located at 710. When the pusher moves backward or forward on the shelf, the transmitter 700, mounted on the pusher 725, moves with the pusher 725. When the pusher 725 is located near the back of the shelf, a signal will take a certain amount of time to travel from the transmitter 700 to the receiver 710. When the pusher 725 is located closer to the front of the shelf, a signal will take less time to travel from the transmitter 700 to the receiver 710. Data regarding the transmission and receipt of the signal (i.e. the pusher code) is sent to a microprocessor or other processing device. The processing device determines the amount of time it takes the signal to travel from the transmitter to the receiver. Knowing the signal travel speed, the processing device determines the distance between the transmitter and the receiver.
With an understanding of the location of the transmitter in relation to the products and an understanding of the location of the receiver in relation to the front or back of the shelf, the processing device will be able to determine the distance between the pusher and the front of the shelf. Using the dimension of the products, the processing device can then determine the number of products in the facing. The light emitting diode or other transmitter can be set to function periodically, continuously or on command from a remote location.
Alternatively, the processing device may control both the LED and phototransistor. The processing device may record a time T1 in which the microprocessor issues a command to generate a pulse from the LED and a time T2 in which the light signal is detected by the phototransistor. Both of these times T1 and T2 may be stored in memory and used to determine the number of product in the facing, using the above described relationships.
In an alternative sensing environment, a capacitive proximity sensor may be utilized to measure the distance between the front of the shelf and the pusher or the final product in a facing of products. The capacitive proximity sensor detects the pusher which acts as a target for the capacitive proximity sensor. The capacitive proximity sensor generates an electrostatic field which is directed at the target. As the distance of the pusher changes with respect to the location of the capacitive proximity sensor, the capacitive proximity sensor reacts to the changes in capacitance caused by the movement of the pusher in relation to the sensor.
Additional sensing environments may also include the use of magnetic proximity sensor or an inductive proximity sensor. In both sensing environments, the proximity sensors may be utilized to measure the distance between the front of the shelf and the pusher or the final product in a facing of product.
An inductive proximity sensor is useful in detection of metal targets as the inductive proximity sensor uses an induced field to sense the target object. In an embodiment with an inductive proximity sensor, the proximity of a pusher in relation to the inductive proximity sensor can be detected as the distance of the pusher changes with respect to the location of the inductive proximity sensor. Similarly, a magnetic proximity sensor based on the Hall Effect principle may also be utilized to sense the location of the pusher.
In an embodiment, a proximity sensor could be mounted near the rear side 707, the proximity sensor configured to sense the distance to the pusher 25. A processing device, such as the store computer or microprocessor, could determine the distance between the pusher 725 and the front side 706 and use that distance to determine how much product was left on the shelf.
In an alternative embodiment, a Radio Frequency Identifying Transponder (“RFIT”) having a unique identity code is mounted to the pusher 725. A sensor assembly including a transmitter/receiver can be mounted on the rear side 707 of the shelf 705. The transmitter/receiver, when activated, transmits an activation signal that activates the RFIT. The RFIT, upon activation, transmits a responsive signal that includes the unique identifying code. The transmitter/receiver receives the responsive signal from the RFIT. The sensor assembly is equipped with a timing device and measures the time between the initial transmission of the signal from the transmitter/receiver until the receipt of the responsive signal from the RFIT. In an embodiment, a controller can initiate the transmission of the signal and record the receipt of the responsive signal into memory. The controller is also equipped with a timing device to measure the delay. The delay in time can be used to calculate the distance between the transmitter/receiver and the RFIT. In an embodiment, the controller can calculate the distance and provide a pusher code that includes the distance. Alternatively, the pusher code will include data regarding the delay and the pusher code will be forwarded to a processing device for distance calculation. As discussed above, the distance between the pusher 25 and the transmitter/receiver can be used to calculate the amount of product remaining in the shelf.
An advantage of using an RFIT in combination with a transmitter/receiver is that it can be easily retro-fitted to existing systems. As the RFIT does not require internal power, this embodiment eliminates the need to provide a powered device on the pusher 725. The transmitter/receiver, however, is powered. Preferably, the transmitter/receiver transmits a focused or low powered signal so that only the RFIT associated with the transmitter/receiver is activated. Alternatively, the transmitter/receiver ignores responsive signals from RFIT's that do not include the proper unique identifying code.
In another alternative embodiment, a low powered, one-chip radar sensor may be used to determine the distance between the radar sensor and the pusher 725. Preferably the radar sensor may be mounted near the rear side 707 so as to make distance determinations less complex.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, a device for measuring the tension of the spring used for pushing the products can be used. The tension on the spring will, at least in part, be dependent upon the number of products in front of the pusher. As more products are placed in front of the pusher, the spring either further compresses or expands. In the case of a coil spring, as more products are placed in front of the pusher, the two ends of the spring move further apart and the spring further uncoils. As the spring uncoils, the amount of tension or pressure within the remaining coil of the spring increases. By measuring the tension of the spring, the length of the spring that is uncoiled can be determined.
The spring tension measuring device can incorporate a processing device or can transmit the information it measures to a microprocessor or other processing device. With a previous understanding of how the tension on the spring relates to the length of the spring, the processing device can determine the amount or length of spring that is uncoiled. For example, if the coil spring has a fixed spring constant, “k”, then the formula F=−kX can be used to calculate the length of spring that is uncoiled. This information can be used to determine the distance between the front of the shelf and the pusher. Understanding the dimensions of the products, the computing device can then determine the number of products in a facing.
A spring tension measuring device may include a force measuring unit that includes, but is not limited to, strain gauges, tensiometers, torque transducers or some other force measuring device to determine the tension exerted on the coil spring. The force measuring unit is preferably connected to a controller, where the controller is configured to convert the data from the force measuring unit into a force value. The controller could then transmit the force value to a processing device. In this embodiment, the pusher code would include a force value. Numerous other methods of measuring spring tension will be apparent to one of skill in the art and are within the scope of the invention.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the number of products remaining in a particular facing is determined in part through the use of one or more transmitter(s) and receiver(s) placed on opposite lateral sides of the products. In one embodiment the transmitters or receivers may be placed on divider walls that separate facings of products. In one embodiment, a series of transmitters is incorporated into or onto the base of a divider wall. A series of receivers in incorporated into or onto the other side of the divider wall. In this manner, when products are on a shelf, those products that are being pushed are between the transmitters on one divider wall and the receivers on another divider wall.
Periodically, when prompted, or continuously, the transmitter sends a signal. If there is no product between the transmitter and the receiver, the receiver will receive the signal. If there is a product between the transmitter and the receiver, the product will block the signal, and the signal will not be received by the receiver.
A microprocessor receives the information regarding whether or not the various receivers received a signal. Based on this information, the microprocessor can determine the approximate distance between the front of the facing and the last product in the facing. With an understanding of the dimension of the products, the information regarding receipt and non-receipt of signals can be translated into an understanding of the approximate number of products in the particular facing. In an embodiment, one transmitter and one receiver is used to indicate that a particular shelf is running low on the associated product. In this embodiment, the location of the transmitter/receiver is preferably closer to the front side 706 then the rear side 707. Preferably a controller with a unique identifying code is associated with the transmitter and receiver so that the unique identifying code can be associated with the product.
The transmitter and the receiver can be incorporated into the same device which attempts to bounce a signal off a predetermined target affixed to a particular location. If the signal bounces as expected, it indicates that there is no product between the transmitter and the target location. If the signal does not bounce as expected, a product exists between the transmitter and the target location.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the pusher contacts a variety of sensing devices as it moves backward or forward on a shelf. Sensing devices are placed on a surface below, above, or on the sides of a pusher. These sensing devices include devices that are mechanical, electrical and eletromechanical, optical and magnetic, and can include spring loaded latches, electrical contacts, light emitting diodes or metal wires or other sensors such as linear position sensors.
As the pusher moves backward or forward on a shelf, it interacts with the sensing devices. The pusher may interact with the devices through the mechanical contact of the pusher and the devices. The pusher may also be equipped with a separate sensing device that interacts with the stationary sensing devices as the pusher moves backward or forward.
Information regarding the interaction between the pusher and the sensing devices (i.e. the pusher code) is sent to a processing device. Based on the determination of the devices with which the pusher interacted, the processing device can determine the approximate position of the pusher in relation to the front of the shelf. With an understanding of product data, such as the dimension of the product, a processing device can then determine the approximate number of products that are in the particular facing related to the pusher and the sensing devices.
In an embodiment, as depicted in
In an alternative embodiment, as depicted in
For example, while contact 816 is activated, the processing device can determine that the amount product is equal to the amount of product that can fit in the space between the contact 816 and the front side 806 of the shelf 801. In the event that the contact 816 is activated and then deactivated, the processing device can determine that the pusher 825 is between contacts 815 and 817. This, therefore, provides an approximate position of the pusher 825 and the approximate position can be used to determine the approximate quantity of product remaining on the shelf. In an embodiment, the contacts can be spaced closer together near the front side 806 of the shelf 801 so that more accurate measurements can be taken as the amount of product on the shelf decreases. Alternatively, enough contacts can be used to provide a relatively precise location of the pusher 825.
In an alternative embodiment, as depicted in
In an alternative embodiment similar to the embodiments described above, a shelf management system 900 for detecting and communicating the position of a pusher assembly on a shelf is depicted in
As depicted, the pusher assembly 915 may include a biasing mechanism such as a coil spring. The pusher assembly 915 may include an integral divider wall 922 and a floor section 920 on one or both sides of the divider wall 922. The coil spring may be operatively connected or associated with a pusher 925 and can be used to urge the pusher 925, and the associated product 910, toward the front side of the shelf. The pusher assembly 915 may be modular and can include a divider wall or an additional floor section that fits or mates in place. Additionally, since the present invention has no connection to the pusher assembly 915, the present invention may work with any product shelving system.
The light assembly may include a light channel 930 and a light transceiver 932. The light transceiver 932 may be one of many light transceivers located on the light channel 930. The light transceiver 932 may be located behind the product 910 to be measured on a shelf. The light transceiver 932 may consist of a light transmitter 934 and a light sensor 936. The light transmitter 934 is configured to send a light signal 935 towards the pusher 925, while the light sensor 936 is configured to receive the light signal 935 from the pusher 925. In an alternative embodiment, the light transmitter 934 and the light sensor 936 may be the same component as part of the light transceiver 932. The spacing of the light transmitters 934 and the light sensors 936 on the light channel 930 may ensure that at least one light transmitter 934 and one light sensor 936 is focused on or sees every pusher 925. Additionally, the light channel 930 may include an electronic connection 938.
Without departing from this invention, the light assembly may utilize one of many different types of light, with one type of light being utilized is in the “infrared spectrum.” For example, the light assembly could include an infrared (IR) transceiver, wherein the IR transceiver may consist of an IR transmitter and an IR sensor.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In an aspect of the invention, the microcomputer in the control module 940 may compare the most current position of the pusher 925 with a previous position of the pusher. The difference in positions of the pusher 925 may result in the microcomputer determining a condition of the shelf management system 900. First, the microcomputer may determine that no activity has occurred since the last reading. Second, the microcomputer may determine that a normal shopping instance has occurred, and if so how many product packages are still being urged by the pusher 925. Third, if more than a predetermined number of product packages have been removed in less than a predetermined amount of time, the microcomputer may determine that a potential theft situation is in progress. Another condition that may be communicated is a low product condition. For example, the microcomputer may determine a low product condition if any pusher location is empty of product packages or less than a predetermined number of product packages are still being urged by the pusher 925.
As illustrated in
Additionally, for the shelf system 900 illustrated in
The thickness of the product also may be determined by the system when products are initially stocked in the system. The light transceiver 932 transmits the light signal 935 to the pusher 925 when no product is on the shelf. The light signal 935 may then be reflected back to the light transceiver 932 to determine the location of the pusher 925 by measuring and calculating the time to receive the light signal 935 at the light transceiver 932. When one product is added to the shelf, for example by an employee, the time to receive the light signal 935 back at the light transceiver 932 decreases a particular amount. Based on this decrease in the amount of time, the control module can calculate the thickness of the product.
In an alternative embodiment similar to the embodiments described above,
The pusher assembly 1015 may include a biasing mechanism such as a sheet coil spring. The pusher assembly 1015 may include an integral divider wall 1022 and a floor section 1020 on one or both sides of the divider wall 1022. The sheet coil spring may be operatively connected to a pusher 1025 and can be used to urge the pusher 1025, and the associated product 1010, toward the front side of the shelf. The pusher assembly 1015 may be modular and can include a divider wall or an additional floor section that fits or mates in place.
The laser assembly may include a rear reflector strip 1030 and a single light transceiver or laser scanner 1032. The laser scanner 1032 may emit or transmit a laser light or output beam 1035. The laser scanner 1032 may include a moving mirror or rotating mirror (not shown) located within or associated with the laser scanner 1032. Without departing from this invention, in place of or in addition to the moving mirror, the laser scanner 1032 may include an integrated circuit mirror technology, such as microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) mirrors used in the Digital Light Projector (DLP) field, wherein an array of tiny microscopic mirrors are used to direct and alter the output beam 1035. The moving mirror may rotate within the laser scanner to alter the output beam 1035 being emitted from the laser scanner 1032. The transmission and angles of the output beam 1035 may also be altered by other various ways. The moving mirror may be controlled by a microcomputer within the control module 1040. The moving mirror may direct the output beam 1035 from the laser scanner 1032 at various angles, thereby creating a swept beam 1037. The swept beam 1037 may be directed along the rear reflector strip. An example of a portion of the swept beam 1037 is illustrated in
As further illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The microcomputer in the control module 1040 may compare the most current position of the pusher 1025 with a previous position. The difference in positions of the pusher 1025 may result in the microcomputer determining a condition of the shelf management system 1000. First, the microcomputer may determine that no activity has occurred since the last reading. Second, the microcomputer may determine that a normal shopping instance has occurred, and if so how many product packages are still being urged by the pusher 1025. Third, if more than a predetermined number of product packages have been removed in less than a predetermined amount of time, the microcomputer may determine that a potential theft situation is in progress. Another condition that may be communicated is a low product condition. For example, the microcomputer may determine a low product condition if any pusher location is empty of product packages or less than a predetermined number of product packages are still being urged by the pusher 1025.
As illustrated in
In another embodiment similar to the embodiments described above, as illustrated in in
Additionally, the microcomputer may execute an algorithm which determines that multiple readings represent only one wide pusher 1125. This might be the case if readings are taken every 1 inch along the length of an example 48 inch-long shelf. A product position 1110 in front of a pusher 1125 on the shelf may be six inches wide. Therefore, in this example, five or six readings may be taken across the back of the pusher 1125 and product as the mirror sweeps and directs the swept beam 1137. If one of the six-inch wide products is removed from the pusher 1125, the microcomputer detects that at least five or six sensing positions essentially simultaneously changed an equal amount. The microcomputer may then be able to determine that all five or six readings represent one product width. This can be a learned aspect of the shelf management system 1100 which can change as different products are merchandised on the shelf over time.
In another embodiment similar to the embodiments described above, as illustrated in
For example, as specifically illustrated in
Additionally, for the shelf system illustrated in
The advantage of the invention illustrated in
The sensors of the various sensing configurations discussed in the above embodiments may output a signal representing the sensed parameter in either analog or digital format. The analog output may in the form of a voltage or current signal. As one skilled in the art will realize, an analog-to-digital converter may be utilized to transform the analog signal to a digital signal for use by a controller or processing device.
Variations and modifications of the foregoing are within the scope of the present invention. It should be understood that the invention disclosed and defined herein extends to all alternative combinations of two or more of the individual features mentioned or evident from the text and/or drawings. All of these different combinations constitute various alternative aspects of the present invention. The embodiments described herein explain the best modes known for practicing the invention and will enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention. The claims are to be construed to include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted by the prior art.
Various features of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This Application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/308,989, filed Jun. 19, 2014, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/194,649, filed Jul. 29, 2011, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,812,378 on Aug. 19, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/876,919, filed Sep. 7, 2010, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,938,396 on Jan. 20, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/772,010, filed Feb. 3, 2004, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,792,711 on Sep. 7, 2010. U.S. application Ser. No. 12/876,919, filed Sep. 7, 2010, also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/371,417, filed Aug. 6, 2010. All of the above referenced applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
154940 | Adams | Sep 1874 | A |
355511 | Danner | Jan 1887 | A |
632231 | Blades | Dec 1905 | A |
808067 | Briggs | Dec 1905 | A |
847863 | Watts | Mar 1907 | A |
1156140 | Hair | Oct 1915 | A |
1682580 | Pratt | Aug 1928 | A |
1703987 | Butler | Mar 1929 | A |
1712080 | Kelly | May 1929 | A |
1714266 | Johnson | May 1929 | A |
1734031 | Carlston | Nov 1929 | A |
1786392 | Kemp | Dec 1930 | A |
1964597 | Rapellin | Jun 1934 | A |
1971749 | Hamilton | Aug 1934 | A |
1991102 | Kernaghan | Feb 1935 | A |
2057627 | Ferris | Oct 1936 | A |
2079754 | Waxgiser | May 1937 | A |
2085479 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 1937 | A |
2110299 | Hinkle | Mar 1938 | A |
2111496 | Scriba | Mar 1938 | A |
2129122 | Follett | Sep 1938 | A |
2185605 | Murphy | Jan 1940 | A |
2218444 | Vineyard | Oct 1940 | A |
2499088 | Brill | Feb 1950 | A |
2516122 | Hughes | Jul 1950 | A |
2538165 | Randtke | Jan 1951 | A |
2555102 | Anderson | May 1951 | A |
2563570 | Williams | Aug 1951 | A |
2652154 | Stevens | Sep 1953 | A |
2670853 | Schneider | Mar 1954 | A |
2678045 | Erhard | May 1954 | A |
2732952 | Skelton | Jan 1956 | A |
2738881 | Michel | Mar 1956 | A |
2750049 | Hunter | Jun 1956 | A |
2775365 | Mestman | Dec 1956 | A |
2893596 | Gabrielsen | Jul 1959 | A |
2918295 | Milner | Dec 1959 | A |
2934212 | Jacobson | Apr 1960 | A |
2948403 | Vallez | Aug 1960 | A |
2964154 | Erickson | Dec 1960 | A |
3083067 | Vos et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3103396 | Portnoy | Sep 1963 | A |
3151576 | Patterson | Oct 1964 | A |
3161295 | Chesley | Dec 1964 | A |
3166195 | Taber | Jan 1965 | A |
3285429 | Propst | Nov 1966 | A |
3308961 | Chesley | Mar 1967 | A |
3308964 | Pistone | Mar 1967 | A |
3348732 | Shwarz | Oct 1967 | A |
3405716 | Cafiero | Oct 1968 | A |
3452899 | Libberton | Jul 1969 | A |
3497081 | Field | Feb 1970 | A |
3501020 | Krikorian | Mar 1970 | A |
D219058 | Kaczur | Oct 1970 | S |
3550979 | Protzmann | Dec 1970 | A |
3598246 | Galli | Aug 1971 | A |
3652154 | Gebel | Mar 1972 | A |
3667826 | Wood | Jun 1972 | A |
3698568 | Armstrong | Oct 1972 | A |
3709371 | Luck | Jan 1973 | A |
3724715 | Auriemma | Apr 1973 | A |
3751129 | Wright et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3767083 | Webb | Oct 1973 | A |
3814490 | Dean et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3815519 | Meyer | Jun 1974 | A |
3830169 | Madey | Aug 1974 | A |
3848745 | Smith | Nov 1974 | A |
3868021 | Heinrich | Feb 1975 | A |
3870156 | O'Neill | Mar 1975 | A |
4007841 | Seipel | Feb 1977 | A |
4042096 | Smith | Aug 1977 | A |
4106668 | Gebhardt et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4269326 | Delbrouck | May 1981 | A |
4300693 | Spamer | Nov 1981 | A |
4303162 | Suttles | Dec 1981 | A |
4314700 | Dylag | Feb 1982 | A |
4331243 | Doll | May 1982 | A |
4351439 | Taylor | Sep 1982 | A |
4378872 | Brown | Apr 1983 | A |
4448653 | Wegmann | May 1984 | A |
4454948 | Spamer | Jun 1984 | A |
4460096 | Ricci | Jul 1984 | A |
4463854 | MacKenzie | Aug 1984 | A |
4467927 | Nathan | Aug 1984 | A |
4476985 | Norberg et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482066 | Dykstra | Nov 1984 | A |
4488653 | Belokin | Dec 1984 | A |
4504100 | Chaumard | Mar 1985 | A |
4588093 | Field | May 1986 | A |
4589349 | Gebhardt et al. | May 1986 | A |
4602560 | Jacky | Jul 1986 | A |
4615276 | Garabedian | Oct 1986 | A |
4620489 | Albano | Nov 1986 | A |
4629072 | Loew | Dec 1986 | A |
4651883 | Gullett et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4685574 | Young et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4705175 | Howard et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4706821 | Kohls et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4724968 | Wombacher | Feb 1988 | A |
4729481 | Hawkinson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4730741 | Jackle, III et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742936 | Rein | May 1988 | A |
4762235 | Howard et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4762236 | Jackle, III et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768661 | Pfeifer | Sep 1988 | A |
4775058 | Yatsko | Oct 1988 | A |
4776472 | Rosen | Oct 1988 | A |
4790037 | Phillips | Dec 1988 | A |
4809856 | Muth | Mar 1989 | A |
4828144 | Garrick | May 1989 | A |
4830201 | Breslow | May 1989 | A |
4836390 | Polvere | Jun 1989 | A |
4846367 | Guigan et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4883169 | Flanagan, Jr. | Nov 1989 | A |
4899668 | Valiulis | Feb 1990 | A |
4901853 | Maryatt | Feb 1990 | A |
4901869 | Hawkinson et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907707 | Crum | Mar 1990 | A |
4934645 | Breslow | Jun 1990 | A |
4954697 | Kokubun et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5009334 | Bodkins | Apr 1991 | A |
5012936 | Crum | May 1991 | A |
5025936 | Lamoureaux | Jun 1991 | A |
5027957 | Skalski | Jul 1991 | A |
5082125 | Ninni | Jan 1992 | A |
5088607 | Risafi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5110192 | Lauterbach | May 1992 | A |
5111942 | Bernardin | May 1992 | A |
5123546 | Crum | Jun 1992 | A |
5148927 | Gebka | Sep 1992 | A |
5161702 | Skalski | Nov 1992 | A |
5172314 | Poland et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178258 | Smalley et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183166 | Belokin, Jr. et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190186 | Yablans et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203463 | Gold | Apr 1993 | A |
5215199 | Bejarano | Jun 1993 | A |
5240126 | Foster et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5255802 | Krinke et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257090 | Meinzer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265738 | Yablans et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5316154 | Hajec, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5341945 | Gibson | Aug 1994 | A |
5351839 | Beeler et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366099 | Schmid | Nov 1994 | A |
5381908 | Klepp | Jan 1995 | A |
5390802 | Pappagallo et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413229 | Zuberbuhler et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415297 | Klein et al. | May 1995 | A |
5448226 | Failing, Jr. et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450969 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458248 | Alain | Oct 1995 | A |
5464105 | Mandeltort | Nov 1995 | A |
5469975 | Fajnsztajn | Nov 1995 | A |
5469976 | Burchell | Nov 1995 | A |
5537312 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542552 | Yablans et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548282 | Escritt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562217 | Salveson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5613621 | Gervasi et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
D378888 | Bertilsson | Apr 1997 | S |
5615780 | Nimetz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634564 | Spamer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638963 | Finnelly et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5665304 | Heinen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671362 | Cowe | Sep 1997 | A |
5671851 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673801 | Markson | Oct 1997 | A |
D386363 | Dardashti | Nov 1997 | S |
5685664 | Parham et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5730320 | David | Mar 1998 | A |
5737504 | Yamada | Apr 1998 | A |
5738019 | Parker | Apr 1998 | A |
5740944 | Crawford | Apr 1998 | A |
5743428 | Rankin, VI | Apr 1998 | A |
5746328 | Beeler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5788090 | Kajiwara | Aug 1998 | A |
5803276 | Vogler | Sep 1998 | A |
5826731 | Dardashti | Oct 1998 | A |
5839588 | Hawkinson | Nov 1998 | A |
5855283 | Johnson | Jan 1999 | A |
5859414 | Grimes et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873473 | Pater | Feb 1999 | A |
5878895 | Springs | Mar 1999 | A |
5880449 | Teicher et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5906283 | Kump et al. | May 1999 | A |
5933813 | Teicher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963134 | Bowers et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971204 | Apps | Oct 1999 | A |
5992652 | Springs | Nov 1999 | A |
5992653 | Anderson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006678 | Merit et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041720 | Hardy | Mar 2000 | A |
6076670 | Yeranossian | Jun 2000 | A |
6082557 | Leahy | Jul 2000 | A |
6082558 | Battaglia | Jul 2000 | A |
6089385 | Nozawa | Jul 2000 | A |
6105004 | Halperin et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105791 | Chalson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112938 | Apps | Sep 2000 | A |
6129218 | Henry et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142317 | Merl | Nov 2000 | A |
6158598 | Josefsson | Dec 2000 | A |
6164491 | Bustos et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173845 | Higgins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6209733 | Higgins et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227385 | Nickerson | May 2001 | B1 |
6234325 | Higgins et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234326 | Higgins et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234328 | Mason | May 2001 | B1 |
6253190 | Sutherland | Jun 2001 | B1 |
D445615 | Burke | Jul 2001 | S |
6253954 | Yasaka | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269285 | Mignault | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289326 | LaFleur | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6357606 | Henry | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378727 | Dupuis et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382431 | Burke | May 2002 | B1 |
6389991 | Morrisson | May 2002 | B1 |
6401942 | Eckert | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405880 | Webb | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409026 | Watanabe | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6409027 | Chang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409028 | Nickerson | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6464089 | Rankin, VI | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484891 | Burke | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497326 | Osawa | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497367 | Conzola et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507352 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6523664 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523703 | Robertson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527127 | Dumontet | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533131 | Bada | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6536658 | Rantze | Mar 2003 | B1 |
D472411 | Burke | Apr 2003 | S |
6550674 | Neumark | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6598754 | Weiler | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622874 | Hawkinson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6655536 | Jo et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666533 | Stavros | Dec 2003 | B1 |
D485699 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
6717516 | Bridgelall | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6738628 | McCall et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6772888 | Burke | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6830157 | Robertson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6866156 | Nagel et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886699 | Johnson et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6889854 | Burke | May 2005 | B2 |
6897763 | Schulmerich et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914648 | Niiyama et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6948900 | Neuman | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6964235 | Hardy | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7002451 | Freeman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7084769 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090125 | Goel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093546 | Hardy | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114606 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152040 | Hawthorne et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152791 | Chappidi et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155238 | Katz | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7216770 | Mueller et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7252230 | Sheikh et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7319397 | Chung et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7400251 | Czyszczewski et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7458473 | Mason | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7493336 | Noonan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7520429 | Koster | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526762 | Astala et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7542283 | Curran et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7565108 | Kotola et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580845 | Burman et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7614065 | Weissmueller, Jr. et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7641057 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7675422 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686185 | Zychinski | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7743984 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775130 | Harish et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775430 | Lin | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792711 | Swafford, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815060 | Iellimo | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7823734 | Hardy | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837106 | Fabre et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853477 | O'Shea et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864041 | Godlewski | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7896172 | Hester | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7904333 | Perkowski | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7982622 | Burchell et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8089357 | Irmscher et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135482 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8144245 | Vik | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8171142 | Kolin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8184005 | Kamel | May 2012 | B2 |
8207819 | Bonner et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8219558 | Trandal et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8231017 | Clontz et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255500 | Cacheria, III et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280784 | Hurtis et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284059 | Ross | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284061 | Dione | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8312999 | Hardy | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8321302 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8322544 | Hardy | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8342340 | Ratajczak, III et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376154 | Sun | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8410931 | Petite et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463431 | Segal et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489452 | Warner et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8629772 | Valiulis et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8662325 | Davis et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8698606 | Choi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8739984 | Hardy | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751318 | Kim et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8781622 | Mockus et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8810392 | Teller et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8844431 | Davis et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8978904 | Hardy | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9167916 | Grant et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9318007 | Valiulis et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9318008 | Valiulis et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9898712 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010010302 | Nickerson | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010017284 | Watanabe | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010051901 | Hager et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020036178 | Tombu | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020108916 | Nickerson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020148794 | Marihugh | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158133 | Conzola et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020170866 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178013 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030000956 | Maldonado | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010732 | Burke | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053014 | Niiyama et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055727 | Walker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057167 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061973 | Bustos | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078691 | Holt | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030085187 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106867 | Caterinacci | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030141265 | Jo et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030150829 | Linden et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193481 | Sokolsky | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217980 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233288 | Sweeney et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040104239 | Black et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118795 | Burke | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040140278 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140279 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040145451 | Failing | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040178156 | Knorring et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040245197 | McElvaney | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260572 | George et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050077259 | Menz | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092702 | Nagel | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108098 | Syed et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131578 | Weaver | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165649 | Mahaffey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168345 | Swafford et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190072 | Brown et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195081 | Studnicki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228718 | Austin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279722 | Ali | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060049122 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071774 | Brown et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060102718 | Kajino et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060131401 | Do et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060163272 | Gamble | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163349 | Neugebauer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060186064 | Merit et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060237381 | Lockwood et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060279527 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289637 | Brice et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016494 | Brown et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070095903 | Suenbuel | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159298 | Zegelin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194037 | Close | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070278164 | Lang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080074264 | Sharpe et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080142458 | Medcalf | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080164310 | Dupuy et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208695 | Condron | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228346 | Lucas et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249658 | Walker et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250464 | Masucci et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255894 | Falls et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080303637 | Gelbman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090020548 | VanDruff | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090084812 | Kirschner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101606 | Olson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090133301 | Saxena et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134103 | Saxena et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139945 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157515 | Lafauci et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090179825 | Enarvi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248198 | Siegel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287992 | Bresolin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313365 | Whitehead | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319399 | Resta et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017025 | Lockwood et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100072152 | Kim | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100460 | Aronson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106588 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106662 | Ramaswamy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100108624 | Sparkowski | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133214 | Evans | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138304 | Boyarsky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169189 | Allison et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169190 | Allison et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100176075 | Nagel et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100200526 | Barkdoll | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205045 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206829 | Clements et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100258513 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262554 | Elliott | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276383 | Hardy | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110010271 | Black et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110017532 | Langford et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018685 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022980 | Segal et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110106624 | Bonner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110106653 | Wein | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128378 | Raji | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161146 | Walker et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178863 | Daigle | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234514 | Gothard | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110251920 | Watson | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110304316 | Hachmann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120004769 | Hallenbeck et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120044056 | Byun et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120120327 | Marx et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147055 | Pallakoff et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120223943 | Williams et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120228240 | Gentile et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245969 | Campbell | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246023 | Starr | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120273442 | Hardy | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120280810 | Wheeler | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284085 | Walker et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284132 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286937 | Cote et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330781 | Borrero | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002422 | Wiese et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130024023 | Siegel et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030953 | Marsic | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130037562 | Close | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130109323 | Ruutu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132216 | Aihara et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157569 | Torvmark et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130210360 | Ljung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130214909 | Meijers et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226742 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130235206 | Smith et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130275261 | Yoked | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130317903 | Majrani | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332271 | Hay | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006225 | Bowman et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006229 | Birch et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140043162 | Siciliano et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140055243 | Kerai | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140100769 | Wurman et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100999 | Mountz et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110584 | Campbell | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140113560 | Graube et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140139548 | Byers | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145828 | Bassan-Eskenazi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140197953 | Valiulis et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201042 | Meyer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210692 | Waters et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214195 | Worsley | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140220883 | Emigh et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140239061 | Smith et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247116 | Davidson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140258028 | Bynum et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268949 | Kayser | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291405 | Harkes | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140299620 | Swafford, Jr. et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140299663 | Shah et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140305891 | Vogler et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140352372 | Grant et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140360953 | Pichel | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150088306 | Varrasso | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150090675 | Vosshernrich | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150356657 | Pas | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150382150 | Ansermet et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160132822 | Swafford | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132823 | Swafford et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132949 | Adoni et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20170061525 | McCoy et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007233199 | Oct 2007 | AU |
906083 | Apr 1987 | BE |
1008382 | Apr 1996 | BE |
2822926 | Feb 2014 | CA |
2822926 | Mar 2018 | CA |
223095 | Aug 1942 | CH |
412251 | Apr 1966 | CH |
1787003 | Jun 2006 | CN |
1972228 | May 2007 | CN |
101208718 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101472509 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101507380 | Aug 2009 | CN |
103703476 | Apr 2014 | CN |
969003 | Apr 1958 | DE |
1819158 | Oct 1960 | DE |
2002720 | Jul 1971 | DE |
7311113 | Aug 1973 | DE |
2232398 | Jan 1974 | DE |
2825724 | Dec 1979 | DE |
3116145 | Nov 1982 | DE |
8308485 | Sep 1983 | DE |
3211880 | Oct 1983 | DE |
8426651 | Feb 1985 | DE |
8520125 | Jan 1986 | DE |
3628609 | Feb 1988 | DE |
4307082 | Sep 1994 | DE |
19745813 | Apr 1999 | DE |
299026888 | Jul 1999 | DE |
102004037365 | Mar 2006 | DE |
0004921 | Oct 1979 | EP |
0018003 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0048479 | Mar 1982 | EP |
0176209 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0224107 | Jun 1987 | EP |
270016 | Jun 1988 | EP |
298500 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0337340 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0398500 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0408400 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0454586 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0572119 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0587059 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0806749 | Nov 1997 | EP |
986980 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0779047 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1057164 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1249804 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1356425 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1395152 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2309377 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2367101 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2385365 | Oct 1978 | FR |
2526338 | Nov 1983 | FR |
2617385 | Jan 1989 | FR |
2859364 | Mar 2005 | FR |
697994 | Oct 1953 | GB |
140311 | Nov 1955 | GB |
881700 | Nov 1961 | GB |
1082150 | Sep 1967 | GB |
1088654 | Oct 1967 | GB |
2027339 | Aug 1982 | GB |
2180527 | Apr 1987 | GB |
2 232 398 | Dec 1990 | GB |
D2037553 | Jul 1994 | GB |
2281289 | Mar 1995 | GB |
2290077 | Dec 1995 | GB |
2297241 | Jul 1996 | GB |
2283407 | Oct 1997 | GB |
2392667 | Mar 2004 | GB |
2480462 | Nov 2011 | GB |
54168195 | Nov 1979 | JP |
59218113 | Aug 1984 | JP |
62060521 | Mar 1987 | JP |
6329463 | Feb 1988 | JP |
6056224 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6209945 | Jul 1994 | JP |
7257714 | Sep 1994 | JP |
H11342054 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2007525393 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2007-284238 | Nov 2007 | JP |
10-2005-0066397 | Jun 2005 | KP |
1020040089123 | Oct 2004 | KR |
1020060123497 | Jun 2008 | KR |
1020090054501 | Dec 2010 | KR |
1020100022890 | Aug 2011 | KR |
1020100041969 | Nov 2011 | KR |
106617 | Nov 1963 | NL |
2101731 | Jan 1998 | RU |
394537 | Jun 1977 | SE |
1600615 | Oct 1990 | SU |
9115141 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9311449 | Jun 1993 | WO |
0061438 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0071004 | Nov 2000 | WO |
02091885 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03016938 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2003032775 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03039301 | May 2003 | WO |
2004104951 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005057444 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006023954 | Mar 2006 | WO |
06133487 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007024639 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007073334 | Jun 2007 | WO |
07140800 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2007149967 | Dec 2007 | WO |
10082835 | Jul 2010 | WO |
10137883 | Dec 2010 | WO |
11001024 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011089452 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012166613 | Dec 2012 | WO |
14080252 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Apr. 6, 2018—(KR) Office Action—App 10-2017-7015819. |
Jan. 18, 2018—(AU) Examination Report—App 2015346254. |
Apr. 2, 2018—(CN) First Office Action—App 201480024831.0. |
May 30, 2018—(AU) Examination Report—App 2015346254. |
Jul. 26, 2018 (US)—Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 14/939,220. |
Jan. 31, 2019—(CN)—Second Office Action—App 201480024831.0. |
Apr. 2, 2014—(RU)—Office Action—App 2013109955. |
Sep. 5, 2013—(US)—Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,919. |
FFr Yello Pages 02003 Product Catalog, “Merchandising Ideas Made Easy for Every Retail Environment!”, Cover p., 9-11, 48-49, 52-58, Back Cover. |
Letter from Maria Comninou of Harness Dickey to Stephanie Knapp dated Nov. 11, 2009. |
Document entitled “Relevant Prior Art for U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010”. |
Shelf-edge digital price tags invade the South of France http://www.digitalsignagetoday.com/article/196299/Shelf-edge-digital-price-tags-invade-the-South-of-France. |
eSignage http://www.episys.com/page/25/esignage.htm. |
Electronic Shelf-Edge Labels (“Realprice system”) http://www.hitech-lcd.com/ESL.htm. |
Segmented Dot Matrix Electronic Shelf Label â€″ SM Model' and 'Segmented Dot Matrix Electronic Narrow Facing Label â€″ MM http://www.ilid.com.au/product-range.php#sm. |
Electronic Shelf-Edge Labels http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/EU/uk/pdf/industries/retail/retail-solutions-electronic-self-edge-labels.pdf. |
The NZ ESL range from pricer http://www.electronicshelflabelling.co.nz/products/. |
Retailer introduces electronic shelf-edge labelling http://www.conveniencestore.co.uk/news/retailer-introduces-electronic-shelf-edge-labelling/231511.article. |
Revolutionary Shelf Edge Displays from in the UK http://crystal-display.com/digital-signage/shelf-edge-displays/. |
XDS-1068: 10-inch All-in-One Multi-touch Signboard with Power-over-Ethernet http://www.iadea.com/product/xds-1068. |
ZBD Solutions, Shelf Edge Labelling -http://www.zbdsolutions.com/solutions/index.html (printed Jan. 29, 2013). |
Vectron, Speedy POS Solutions to make ezi-profits. 15 pages. |
“How physics drives the supermarket industry,” IOP Institute of Physics, PhysicsWorks. 4 pages. |
John Ross, “Retail technology and the evolving shopper,” Shopper Sciences. 11 pages. |
Altierre Digital Retail, Altierre Corp., “Altierre Unveils E-Paper Product Family for Digital Signs and Price Tags.” 2 pages, http://www.altierre.com/pr_e-paper.html (printed Jan. 31, 2013). |
Suzanne Vita Palazzo, “New life for ESLs?, Advanced capabilities being built into electronic shelf labels may help overcome retailers' concerns about ROI.”, Grocery Headquarters (www.groceryheadquarters.com), Mar. 2007, pp. 97-100. |
Scott D. Walkins & Megan E. Henriksen of Anderson Economic Group, LLC, “Michigan's Item Pricing Law: The Price Tag for Retailers and Consumers,” Dec. 11, 2010 (http://www.AndersonEiectronicGroup.com) 39 pages. |
“Product Range :: I LID—The next generation in electronic shelf labels,” : http://www.ilid.com.au/product-range.php, printed on Mar. 5, 2013, dale of website unknown but prior to the filing of the present matter. |
“Electronic Shelf Label controlling various information in real lime (ESL),” hllp:l/cesl.co.kr/eng/product-inlroduction/cest-esl.hlml, CEST—Center for Embedded Software Technology, printed on Mar. 5, 2013, dale of website unknown but prior to the filing of the present matter. |
Jun. 24, 2014—(MX)—Office Action—App MX/a/2013/001455—Eng Tran. |
Mar. 3, 2015—(AU) Office Action—App 2011285929. |
Mar. 3, 2015—(AU) Office Action—App 2013205058. |
Apr. 6, 2015—(PCT) International Search Report—App PCT/US14/29124. |
Dec. 14, 2015—(EP) Exam Report—App 11745636.8. |
Apr. 19, 2016—(KR) Office Action—App 10-2015-7027591. |
Apr. 22, 2016—(PCT)—International Search Report—App PCT/US2015/060404. |
Apr. 22, 2016 (PCT) ISR and Written Opinion—App PCT/US2015/060404. |
Jun. 22, 2016—(AU) Search Report—App 2014225837. |
Jun. 28, 2016—(AU) Examination Report—App 2014228923. |
Aug. 18, 2016—(EP) Office Action—App 14716461.0. |
Jun. 10, 2014—(PCT) ISR & Written Opinion—App PCT/US2014/020797. |
Sep. 19, 2016—(PCT) International Search Report—App PCT/US2016/032328. |
Robertson, “Food Packaging: Principles and Practice, Second Edition”, CRC Press, XP055301114, ISBN: 978-0-8493-3775-8, vol. 0, p. 308, dated Sep. 22, 2005. |
George Coulouris et al., “Distributed Systems: Concepts and Design (5th Edition)”, Addison-Wesley, US, XP055261658, ISBN: 978-0-13-214301-1 pp. Ch01-Ch06, Ch09-Ch10, ch13 Chapters 1, 3 and 19, dated May 7, 2011. |
Oct. 27, 2016—(KR) Final Rejection—App 10-2015-7027591. |
Nov. 18, 2016—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,989. |
Jul. 10, 2013—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,649. |
Jan. 15, 2014—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 13/194,649. |
Jan. 3, 2014—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 12/876,919. |
Mar. 4, 2008—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010. |
Sep. 3, 2008—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010. |
Mar. 9, 2009—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010. |
Aug. 19, 2009—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010. |
Feb. 2, 2010—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010. |
Jun. 2, 2010—(US) Final Office Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 10/772,010. |
Oct. 7, 2015—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,989. |
May 4, 2016—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,989. |
Dec. 15, 2016—(US) Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,680. |
Jun. 2, 2016—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,680. |
Sep. 23, 2014—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,680. |
Mar. 24, 2015—(US) Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 13/836,680. |
Dec. 14, 2015—(EP) Examination Report—App 11745636. |
Mar. 20, 2008—(WO) ISR and Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US05/02836. |
Jan. 28, 2011—(EP) Supplementary Search Report—App. No. 05712322.6-2221. |
Dec. 6, 2011—(EP) Office Action—App. No. 05712322.6-2221. |
May 25, 2011—(EP) Office Action—App. No. 05712322.6-2221. |
Nov. 24, 2011—(WO) ISR and Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US2011/046209. |
Feb. 21, 2013—(WO) IPR and Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US2011/046209. |
Apr. 2, 2014—(RU) Office Action—App. No. 2013109955. |
Sep. 24, 2015—(WO) IPRP and Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US2014/29124. |
Apr. 6, 2015—(WO) Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US2014/29124. |
Mar. 1, 2017—(AU) Second Office Action—App. No. 2014228923. |
Aug. 19, 2016—(EP) Extended ESR—App. No. 14723571.7-1903. |
Apr. 6, 2015—(WO) ISR—App. No. PCT/US2014/29124. |
Jun. 19, 2017—(CN) First Office Action and ISR—App. No. 201480026575.9. |
Jun. 7, 2017—(CN) ISR—App. No. 201480026575.9. |
Jul. 18, 2017—(KR) Office Action—App. 10-2015-7029832. |
Sep. 7, 2017—(US)—Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,421. |
Oct. 28, 2018—(KR) Final Rejection—App 10-2017-7015819. |
Jan. 10, 2019—(WO) International Search Report and Written Opinion—App. No. PCT/US2018/051775. |
Apr. 22, 2019—(KR) Office Action—App. No. 10-2018-7015060. |
Jun. 14, 2019—(EP) Partial European Search Report—App 19158063.8. |
Jul. 6, 2018—(CN) Third Office Action—App 201480026575.9. |
Nov. 7, 2017—(EP) Extended Search Report—App. No. 17177125.6. |
Nov. 7, 2017—(EP)—Communication 94(3) EPC—App 14716461.0. |
Nov. 28, 2017 (US)—Non-Final Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 14/713,809. |
Feb. 11, 2019—(KR) Office Action—App 10-2017-736152. |
Mar. 15, 2019—(EP) Extended Europen Search Report and European Search Opinion—App 19153057.5. |
Jul. 5, 2019—(CN) Office Action—App. No. 201580072899.0. |
Feb. 23, 2018—(CN) Second Office Action—App. No. 201480026575.9—MM. |
Mar. 14, 2018—(EP) Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180047243 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61371417 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14308989 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 15794985 | US | |
Parent | 13194649 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 14308989 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12876919 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13194649 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10772010 | Feb 2004 | US |
Child | 12876919 | US |