The present application is the U.S. counterpart of WO 2006/037908 and claims priority to French Application No. 04/52285 filed on Oct. 7, 2004, the contents of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the field of the manufacture of chopped strands for technical use, particularly thermoplastic strands and especially glass strands and it relates more specifically an automatic restart procedure and to a system for manufacturing such strands that implements this procedure.
Many devices capable of carrying out such manufacture are known. In general, these systems comprise at least one bushing from which glass strands are drawn and taken into a chopping device, consisting for example of a backup roll or anvil that cooperates with a chopper roll fitted with blades uniformly distributed around its periphery. The chopper is placed so as to come into contact with pressure applied, with the circumferential surface of the backup roll, thus defining a chopping zone.
French Certificate of Addition FR 2 075 019 illustrates a system of this type in which a bushing is combined with a chopping device.
To increase the productivity of chopped-strand manufacturing installations, solutions have been devised in which several bushings feed a single chopping device. French Patent FR 2 490 251 illustrates a solution of this type. These techniques have in principle the advantage of employing a single chopping machine combined with several bushings.
Now, these, chopping machines are designed to produce the order of ten tons of chopped strands per day. It is conventionally accepted that, to produce such a quantity, the user is faced with several tens of “bushing breaks” (a “bushing break” is defined as a break in the web of filaments between the exit of the bushing and the chopper) that will require as many restart phases to be carried out by the operator (a restart phase is an operation consisting in re-establishing continuity of the web of filaments between the bushing and the chopper).
To significantly increase the production capacity (by at least a factor of two) constitutes an objective almost impossible to achieve when considering the same industrial equipment, with manual restart, served by the same number of users.
As mentioned above, the most critical stage is the interruption in the bushings as a result of a bushing break. These bushing breaks require human intervention to restart the strand in the chopping machine. This incident is therefore particularly detrimental to the production efficiency, as it requires a relatively long preparation time.
A restart operation, for feeding a strand into a chopper, is a transient operation that is very difficult to manage insofar as the strand is fragile and its linear speed has to be brought from almost zero to several tens of m/s. In general it is found that a restart operation is broken down into ⅔ of the time for re-establishing optimum operating conditions at the bushing, and a little less than ⅓ of the time for bringing the installation back on stream.
It will therefore be understood that this restart phase is a vital operation in this continuous process insofar as, if it is not 100% successful, the production is stopped and the efficiency of the machine falls.
A first restart technique consists in manually depositing a strand onto a set of feed rolls lying approximately tangentially to the anvil wheel as far as a restart wheel designed to progressively bring the speed of the strand to a speed compatible with the chopping speed, and then, at this speed, after the strand has been transferred from the feed rolls onto the anvil wheel, the strand is introduced by an articulated arm between the anvil wheel and the chopper wheel.
Although this restart operation has the advantage of preserving the thermal stability of the bushings in production during the restart, manual human intervention is required for depositing the strand and impressing thereonto a curvilinear path as far as the restart wheel. This makes the operation difficult to automate as such, owing to the kinematics of the movements.
A second technique, described for example in the document FR 2 804 974, which is an improvement over the first technique, consists in considering a linear path of the strand between the bushing and the restart wheel. For this purpose, a chopper is interposed in the linear path, whereby the equipment formed by the anvil wheel and the chopper wheel forms a kind of clamp which can, depending on the case, progressively grip the strand and make it undergo a rotational movement before finally arriving in a standard chopping position, or else to move it away therefrom.
Although it will be understood that such a device is easy to automate, it does have, however, a major drawback in that the device can chop only a single strand coming from a single bushing, and therefore a chopper of this type has to be dedicated to each bushing. From the economic standpoint, this arrangement is less advantageous.
Also known, from document U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,289, is a restart system that consists, via a gripping member traveling across a guiding tube, in reproducing the movement of the operator. The main drawback of this solution lies mainly in its size, since it is permanently facing the bushings, it poses safety problems and it runs the risk of impeding the operator's movement and his interventions in the process.
The present invention offers a solution to the abovementioned problems by providing a procedure for automating the restart on a chopper position downstream of a plurality of bushings.
According to the invention, the automatic restart procedure is, characterized in that:
In other preferred methods of implementing the invention, one or more of the following arrangements may optionally be also employed:
Thus, the subject of the present invention is also a system intended for manufacturing chopped strands for technical use, in particular thermoplastic strands and especially glass strands, comprising at least one bushing that cooperates with at least one chopping machine comprising an anvil wheel and a chopper wheel, said chopping machine being placed in the extension of said bushing.
According to the invention, said system further includes a gripping device designed to move at least one strand up to a drawing device, for drawing said strand, and a transfer device for modifying the path of the strand between the bushing and the device for drawing said strand, the transfer device also being able to position the strand in at least two positions, namely one in which the strand is subjected to a pulling movement near the periphery of the anvil wheel and the chopper wheel and the other in which the strand is set back from the chopper wheel and the anvil wheel.
In other preferred embodiments of the invention, one or more of the following arrangements may optionally be also employed:
Thanks to this automatic restart system, the productivity of such systems may be increased (less human intervention) and the production costs can be reduced while still meeting the latest expectations of customers.
More precisely, because of the automatic restart, it is more difficult for the kinematics of the gripping device to be subject to any drift over time, thereby reducing the risk of seeing the restart fail because of inappropriate human intervention.
Preferably, the various elements are arranged in such a way that the path of the strands and of the filaments from the bushing right to the chopping machine lies overall in a vertical plane, the filaments having an approximately vertical direction from the bushing right to the turn roller, and the strands having an approximately horizontal direction from the turn roller right to their entry into the chopping machine.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the system comprises several bushings associated with just one chopping machine, and said bushings are aligned one beside another.
Other features, details and advantages of the present invention will become more clearly apparent on reading the description that follows, given by way of illustration but implying no limitation, with reference to the appended drawings in which:
The filaments 2 generally undergo a sizing operation, that is to say a chemical treatment designed to apply thereonto a product that provides the strand with cohesion and sufficient lubrication, and a capability to be subsequently used, in terms of processability and reinforcement/matrix compatibility, by a size applicator roller 3.
The filaments coming from a bushing are then combined by assembling rollers 4 into at least one strand 5 which is turned, by a device such as a deflection or turn roll 6, so as to send them to a chopping machine 7 located downstream of the bushing 1/size applicator roller 3/turn roll 6 assembly.
The chopping machine 7 may comprise a blade-carrying wheel 8, an anvil wheel 9 and, optionally, a grinding wheel (not shown), as described for example in patent application FR 2 075 019 filed in the name of the Applicant.
Moreover, the arrangement of the principal constituents of the installation illustrated in
The bushing 1 and the size applicator roller 3 are placed one above the others for example within one and the same fiberizing cell which stands on the floor on which the chopping machine stands.
The turn roll 6 lies vertically above the size applicator roller 3. An opening made in the floor allows the bundle of filaments to pass downstream of the size applicator roller. This opening may also allow the fibers to be removed when there are bushing breaks.
Thus, the filaments 2 follow an approximately vertical path from the bushing 1 the turn roll 6, which turns the strands through 90° so as to bring them horizontally (or approximately horizontally) to the chopping machine 7. The chopping machine 7 firstly comprises a blade-carrying wheel 8 (or chopper wheel) and an anvil wheel 9. Details about the construction of these wheels are given in the prior literature, especially in publication EP 0 040 145. The anvil and chopper wheels are in contact with one another under slight pressure, in such a way that, in the contact zone, which is also the chopping zone, deformation of the elastomer results in the blades of the blade-carrying wheel being flush. In practice, only one of the two wheels is a driving wheel, the other being driven by being in contact therewith. Preferably, it is the blade-carrying wheel that is the driving wheel. The driving is performed by an electric motor, preferably with direct transmission via the hub of the wheel in question.
The chopped strands 11 are collected in a receiving device 12. During the gaps in the chopping operation, in particular when a bushing is being restarted, the strands are drawn by a drawing system 23 usually called a strand puller (cf. see
Under running conditions the chopping machine 7 pulls on the strands, either or both of the anvil 9 and the blade-carrying wheel 8 of the machine being motor-driven.
The strand must pass from vertically below the bushing 1 to the chopping machine 7, either when starting up the assembly or during a restart phase, in one manner or the other, so that the strand is driven into the contact zone between the chopper wheel and the anvil wheel.
It will be recalled that, conventionally and according to the prior art, this introduction is carried out manually by the operator. This restart phase consists, in a known manners in grabbing a strand from the strand puller positioned at the base of the bushing and in bringing it to a restart wheel (shown schematically by the reference 24 in
The present invention aims to improve this installation of the prior art by substituting the chopping machine referenced 7 in
Without departing from the scope of the invention, the chopping machine with its automatic restart system may be placed to the rear or to the front of the bushing or to the right or the left and under the bushing.
In the diagram shown in
This is accomplished by using a high-speed drawing device 13 (visible in particular in
The high-speed drawing device comprises a three-dimensional frame possessing three or more sides, this being assembled from standard commercial components by conventional welding fabrication or equivalent techniques.
As may be seen in
In an alternative embodiments the drive members 14, 15 form a chopper. One of the members constitutes the anvil, while the other forms a chopping counterwheel provided with a plurality of blades mounted approximately perpendicular to the path of said strand. This alternative embodiment may be particularly advantageous as it is possible to continue to produce chopped strands during the transient phases, during which restart steps on the main chopping machine are carried out.
In
The gripping device 21 provided with its gripper or any other similar device performs a linear motion from the turn roll 6 to the high-speed drawing device 13.
The automatic restart procedure is broken down in the following manner (see the sequence in
In
It should be pointed out that the strand 5, over its path between the turn roll 10 and the high-speed drawing device 13, is guided by at least one entry strand guiding member 16 and at least one exit strand guiding member 17 positioned upstream and downstream of the chopping machine 7, respectively. These members are approximately in line and lie in the same plane as the turn wheel 10 and the high-speed drawing device 13.
This transfer device 18 is provided with at least one restart roll 19, 19′, this transfer device 18 being articulated between a first position, called the rest position (
During the operating phase shown in
In the example shown in
The sequence shown in
The transfer, engagement, gripping and drawing device of the automatic restart system described above are all operated and controlled by a controller or any other equivalent computer system.
Advantageously the present invention meets the increasingly stringent safety requirements. Using the automatic restart, the time during which there is contact between the operator and the fiber is reduced, thereby lowering the risk of an incident (cut, burn, etc.).
According to the present invention, the operator watches the automatic restart phases for each of the bushings—his own movements are thus considerably reduced between the bushings and the chopper—and he can thus bring his entire attention to the transient phase of re-establishing the thermal stability of the bushing.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04 52285 | Oct 2004 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2005/050727 | 9/12/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/3/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/037908 | 4/13/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3128028 | Crafford | Apr 1964 | A |
3279709 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3293013 | Drummond | Dec 1966 | A |
3644109 | Klink et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3681039 | Marzocchi | Aug 1972 | A |
3744361 | Van Doorn | Jul 1973 | A |
3771701 | Brunk et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3815461 | Genson | Jun 1974 | A |
3841184 | Thatcher | Oct 1974 | A |
3852141 | Cross | Dec 1974 | A |
3873290 | Marzocchi | Mar 1975 | A |
3915681 | Ackley | Oct 1975 | A |
4033741 | Drummond | Jul 1977 | A |
4175939 | Nakazawa et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4210293 | Fromaget | Jul 1980 | A |
4222758 | Stotler et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4347071 | Willis et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4362260 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4367084 | Cox et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4369681 | Van Doorn et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4411180 | Roncato | Oct 1983 | A |
4548106 | Fleissner | Oct 1985 | A |
4551160 | Frailey et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4655111 | Blaker et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4682523 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4771665 | Van Doorn et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5092207 | Kikuchi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108678 | Hirasaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5398575 | Rewitzer | Mar 1995 | A |
5935289 | Arterburn et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5970837 | Arterburn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6062048 | Arterburn et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076442 | Arterburn et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6148640 | Hendrickson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6182332 | Jander | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202525 | Hendrickson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6267035 | Bascom et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6415997 | Font et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6845696 | Font et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
20030000258 | Font et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040172978 | Bumgarner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050066688 | Eis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20090193852 | Boissonnat et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100139326 | Karbowski | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110008482 | Font | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
284044 | Jul 1952 | CH |
48658 | Mar 1982 | EP |
849381 | Jun 1998 | EP |
978580 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1910236 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2075019 | Oct 1971 | FR |
2126663 | Oct 1972 | FR |
2162068 | Jul 1973 | FR |
2204715 | May 1974 | FR |
2490251 | Mar 1982 | FR |
2804974 | Aug 2001 | FR |
2876392 | Apr 2006 | FR |
2916003 | Aug 2009 | FR |
2 036 716 | Jul 1980 | GB |
58-190834 | Nov 1983 | JP |
9801610 | Jan 1998 | WO |
2006008408 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006037908 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2007010168 | Jan 2007 | WO |
08141123 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/630,683 dated Jul. 20, 2012. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/312,849 dated Jun. 16, 2004. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/312,849 dated Oct. 5, 2004. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/630,683 dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/630,683 dated Jan. 21, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/630,683 dated Jun. 22, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,336 dated Feb. 16, 2011. |
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,336 dated Aug. 25, 2011. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200580021634.4 dated Jul. 24, 2009. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200580021634.4 dated Sep. 2, 2010. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200880015649.3 dated Jul. 12, 2010. |
Office action from Korean Application No. 10-2006-7027227 dated Mar. 6, 2012 with English explanation of relevant portions of action, 6 pgs. |
Office action from Japanese Application No. 2008-522031 dated Mar. 27, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Search Report from France Application No. 656723 dated May 20, 2005, 2 pgs. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200580034102.4 dated Apr. 10, 2009, 9 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/FRO5/050727 dated Jan. 26, 2006, 13 pgs. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200580034102.4 dated May 11, 2010, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/FRO5/50497 dated Oct. 24, 2005, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/FRO6/50728 dated Jan. 12, 2007, 8 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US08/063154 dated Oct. 20, 2008, 8 pgs. |
Communication from Chinese Application No. 200580021634.4 dated Aug. 2, 2010, 1 pg. |
Communication from European Application No. 06794482.7 dated Jul. 30, 2008, 4 pgs. |
Communication from European Application No. 06794482.7 dated Sep. 30, 2010, 5 pgs. |
Communication from European Application No. 05798963.4 dated Mar. 31, 2008, 4 pgs. |
Office action from Korean Application No. 10-2007-7007843 dated May 30, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Office action from Korean Application No. 10-2007-7007843 dated Dec. 31, 2012, 7 pgs. |
Office action from Mexican Application No. MX/a/2008/001000 dated Oct. 25, 2011 with English explanation of relevant portions of action, 3 pgs. |
Office action from Chiense Application No. 01812396.1 dated Jan. 27, 2006, 4 pgs. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200580034201.4 dated Apr. 10, 2009, 9 pgs. |
Office action from Chinese Application No. 200580034102.4 dated May 10, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Search Report and Written Opinion from FR 0755025 dated Dec. 21, 2007, 11 pgs. |
Office action from Indian Application No. IN/PCT/2002/01518 dated Nov. 18, 2005, 2 pgs. |
Office action from Mexican Application No. 2008/001000 dated Oct. 25, 2011 along with English translation of relevant portions of action, 3 pgs. |
Office action from Slovakia Application No. PP 1823-2002 dated Apr. 25, 2006, 4 pgs. |
Office action from Korean Application No. 10-2008-7001574 dated Oct. 16, 2012, 5 pgs. |
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,336 dated Sep. 17, 2013, 3 pgs. |
Resubmission of Office action from U.S. Application No. 11/996,336 dated May 23, 2013, 54 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/996,336 dated Oct. 11, 2013, 14 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080115537 A1 | May 2008 | US |