Fuel cell power plants are useful as primary or back up power sources. Each power plant typically includes several cell stack assemblies that each include many fuel cells. One issue associated with fuel cell power plant operation is providing the anodes of the respective cell stack assemblies with sufficient hydrogen to avoid a fuel starvation condition. One known technique for avoiding potential fuel starvation includes using gas chromatography to measure hydrogen associated with the cell stack assemblies as part of the assembly or installation procedures. One drawback to this approach includes requiring additional time and labor, which contributes to the cost of the system. This approach is also not able to account for variations in fuel usage or hydrogen utilization over time, which occurs in most power plants.
An illustrative example system for managing hydrogen utilization in a fuel cell power plant includes a first hydrogen concentration sensor that provides an indication of a first concentration of hydrogen in a fluid flowing into an anode inlet of the power plant. A second hydrogen concentration sensor provides an indication of a second concentration of hydrogen in a fluid flowing out of an anode exit of the power plant. A processor determines a utilization of hydrogen by the power plant based on the first and second concentrations.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of the previous paragraph, the processor determines whether the utilization of hydrogen is within a preselected range and provides an output when the utilization is outside the preselected range.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs, the output comprises an alarm indicating fuel starvation if the utilization is above a threshold percentage.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs, the preselected range is based on a power output of the power plant.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs, the processor determines the utilization of hydrogen by the power plant based on a formula: (first concentration−second concentration)/(first concentration×(1−second concentration)).
An example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs includes at least one third hydrogen concentration sensor that provides an indication of a third concentration of hydrogen associated with anodes of at least one cell stack assembly within the power plant and wherein the processor determines a utilization of hydrogen by the at least one cell stack assembly based on the first and third concentrations.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs, the at least one third hydrogen concentration sensor comprises a plurality of third hydrogen concentration sensors that provide indications of the third concentration associated with respective cell stack assemblies of the power plant and the processor determines a utilization of hydrogen by each of the cell stack assemblies.
An illustrative example fuel cell power plant includes the system of any of the previous paragraphs and the processor controls an amount of fuel provided to the anode inlet of the power plant based on the utilization.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs includes a fuel reformer and wherein the processor controls operation of the fuel reformer based on the utilization.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs, the processor increases an amount of hydrogen provided to the anode inlet of the power plant when the utilization is above a preselected range.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the system of any of the previous paragraphs, the processor shuts down the power plant when the utilization of hydrogen by the power plant is outside the preselected range.
An illustrative example method of managing hydrogen utilization in a fuel cell power plant includes determining a first concentration of hydrogen in a fluid flowing into an anode inlet of the power plant, determining a second concentration of hydrogen in a fluid flowing out of an anode exit of the power plant, and determining a utilization of hydrogen by the power plant based on the first and second concentrations.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the method of the previous paragraph, the first concentration is determined based on an indication from a first hydrogen concentration sensor situated to sense hydrogen in the fluid flowing into the anode inlet of the power plant and the second concentration is determined based on an indication from a second hydrogen concentration sensor situated to sense hydrogen in the fluid flowing out of the anode exit of the power plant.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs includes determining whether the utilization of hydrogen is within a preselected range and providing an output at least when the utilization is outside the preselected range.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs, the output comprises an alarm indicating fuel starvation if the utilization is above a threshold percentage.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs includes determining a third concentration of hydrogen associated with anodes of at least one cell stack assembly within the power plant and determining a utilization of hydrogen by the at least one cell stack assembly based on the first and third concentrations.
In an example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs, determining the utilization of hydrogen by the power plant is based on a formula: (first concentration−second concentration)/(first concentration×(1−second concentration)).
An example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs includes controlling an amount of fuel provided to the anode inlet of the power plant based on the utilization.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs includes controlling operation of a fuel reformer of the power plant based on the utilization.
An example embodiment having one or more features of the method of any of the previous paragraphs includes shutting down the power plant when the utilization of hydrogen by the power plant is outside the preselected range.
Various features and advantages of at least one disclosed example embodiment will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
A first hydrogen concentration sensor 50 is situated to detect a hydrogen concentration in the fluid flowing through the anode inlet 34. The exact position of the first hydrogen concentration sensor may vary depending on the configuration of the power plant. In some embodiments, the first hydrogen concentration sensor is situated in an inlet pipe that feeds into the individual manifold inlets of the power plant.
The first hydrogen concentration sensor 50 provides an indication of the concentration of hydrogen in the fluid flowing through the anode inlet 34 to a processor 52. The processor 52 includes at least one computing device and memory.
A second hydrogen concentration sensor 54 provides an indication of a concentration of hydrogen in the fluid flowing through the anode exit 40. The exact location of the second hydrogen concentration sensor may vary depending on the configuration of the power plant provided that the indication corresponds to the hydrogen concentration at the outlet or anode exit 40. The processor 52 receives the indication from the second hydrogen concentration sensor 54.
A third hydrogen concentration sensor 56 is associated with the anodes 36 of the cell stack assembly 30. In an example embodiment, the third hydrogen concentration sensor 56 is situated to provide an indication of a concentration of hydrogen in fluid exhausted from the anodes 36. Another third hydrogen concentration sensor 58 is associated with the anodes 38 of the cell stack assembly 32. The hydrogen concentration sensor 58 provides an indication of a concentration of hydrogen in fluid exhausted by the anodes 38. In some embodiments, the third hydrogen concentration sensors 56, 58 are strategically placed in the manifold or at the manifold outlet of the respective stack to provide an indication of the hydrogen concentration of a sensitive one of the cell stack assemblies or a sensitive portion of such a stack. The processor 52 receives the hydrogen concentration indications from the third hydrogen concentration sensors 56 and 58.
The processor 52 manages hydrogen utilization by the power plant 20 and within the cell stack assemblies 30 and 32. The processor 52 in this example is capable of monitoring and managing the hydrogen utilization of individual cell stack assemblies within the power generating portion 28 of the power plant 20. Managing hydrogen utilization according to an embodiment consistent with this description allows for more efficient or complete use of the fuel. The example processor 52 actively manages bulk hydrogen utilization for the power plant 20 and hydrogen utilization by the cell stack assemblies 30, 32. Actively managing the hydrogen utilization avoids providing significantly more hydrogen than is needed while simultaneously avoiding a fuel starvation condition. Providing too much hydrogen is considered inefficient and providing too little increases the risk of fuel starvation. The disclosed example embodiment balances those two considerations.
At 66, the processor 52 determines a third hydrogen concentration associated with the anodes 36, 38 of the respective cell stack assemblies 30 and 32.
At 68, the processor 52 determines hydrogen utilization by the power plant 20 based on the first concentration and the second concentration. In an example embodiment, the hydrogen utilization by the power plant 20 is a percentage determined by the processor 52 based on the formula: 100×(first concentration−second concentration)/(first concentration×(1−second concentration)).
At 70, the processor 52 determines hydrogen utilization by the respective cell stack assemblies 30, 32 based on the first and respective third concentrations. In an example embodiment, the processor 52 determines the respective cell stack assembly hydrogen utilization as a percentage using the formula: 100×(first concentration−third concentration)/(first concentration×(1−third concentration)).
The hydrogen utilization information allows the processor 52 to control operation of the power plant 20, individual cell stack assemblies 30, 32, the reformer 24, or a combination of them to ensure desired power plant operation. In an example embodiment, the processor 52 determines when conditions exist that may be associated with or be a result of fuel starvation experienced by one or more of the cell stack assemblies. For example, the processor 52 has predetermined relationships between power outputs of the power plant 20 and hydrogen utilization percentages that correspond to desired operation. When the actual hydrogen utilization is outside of a predetermined or preselected range for a given power output, the processor 52 in some embodiments provides an alert or alarm output regarding the condition and adjusts operation of at least a portion of the power plant 20 to attempt to bring the hydrogen utilization back within an acceptable range.
For example, a hydrogen utilization range between 79% and 81% is considered acceptable when the power plant 20 output is on the order of 400 to 500 kilowatts. When the output is on the order of 250 kilowatts or lower, an acceptable hydrogen utilization range is between 72% and 81%.
In the event that the hydrogen utilization is too high, the processor 52 causes a change in operation of the reformer 24 to increase the supply of hydrogen to the cell stack assemblies to avoid a fuel starve event. For example, whenever the hydrogen utilization is greater than 90% over a period of time that is statistically significant, which is predetermined, the processor 52 generates an output that is issued as an alarm or indication to authorized personnel regarding the condition of the power plant 20. The processor 52 may also automatically implement control procedures to adjust the power output or the amount of fuel provided to the cell stack assemblies. In some examples, the processor 52 will shut down the power plant or one or more cell stack assemblies when the hydrogen utilization conditions satisfy a set of predetermined criteria.
The hydrogen concentration sensors 50, 54, 56 and 58 may be realized using a variety of different sensor types. One example embodiment includes a hydrogen concentration sensor as shown in
As shown in
A reference electrode 132 is situated to be exposed to the pure hydrogen in the hydrogen chamber 130. The reference electrode 132 is part of a second electrochemical cell 134 that also includes a detection electrode 136 and a matrix 138. The matrix 138 in this example also contains a liquid electrolyte, such as phosphoric acid.
The detection electrode 136 is exposed to the fluid of interest outside the hydrogen chamber 130, such as the fluid flowing through the power plant anode inlet 34, and provides an indication of a concentration of hydrogen in that fluid. The illustrated example embodiment utilizes the known Nernst Potential phenomenon as a basis for determining the hydrogen concentration outside of the hydrogen chamber 130. A potential difference (i.e., a voltage) across the detection electrode 136 and the reference electrode 132 provides an indication of the concentration of hydrogen in the fluid of interest.
In the illustrated example, the hydrogen oxidizing electrode 126 and the detection electrode 136 are exposed to the same fluid, such as the fuel from the reformer 26. At least some hydrogen from that gas is introduced into the hydrogen chamber 130 by the hydrogen evolving electrode 122. The first electrochemical cell 124 reduces protons based on the hydrogen oxidizing electrode 126 being exposed to the fluid outside the hydrogen chamber 130. The hydrogen oxidizing electrode 126 has a size and position relative to the detection electrode 136 that does not alter the hydrogen concentration in the fluid near the detection electrode 136 to avoid skewing the hydrogen concentration measured by the sensor 50.
In the illustrated example, the pure hydrogen in the hydrogen chamber 130 is kept from mixing with fluid outside the hydrogen chamber 130 by positive pressure within the hydrogen chamber 130. The hydrogen evolving electrode 122 introduces a positive pressure within the hydrogen chamber 130. The size of the hydrogen evolving electrode 122, the amount of pure hydrogen introduced into the hydrogen chamber 130 over time, or both is selectable to provide a desired level of positive pressure within the hydrogen chamber 130.
The example hydrogen chamber 130 includes a vent 140 that allows pure hydrogen to exit the hydrogen chamber 130. The positive pressure within the hydrogen chamber 130 prevents any fluid outside the hydrogen chamber 130 from entering the chamber 130.
One feature of the illustrated example hydrogen concentration sensor 50 is that the reference electrode 132 is distinct from the hydrogen evolving electrode 122. Using the hydrogen evolving electrode 122 to provide the pure hydrogen that keeps the reference electrode 132 at a desired reference potential avoids any need to apply current to the reference electrode. This feature eliminates any shifts in the reference potential that would otherwise occur if the reference electrode 132 were used to evolve pure hydrogen. Having the reference electrode 132 exposed to only pure hydrogen in the hydrogen chamber 130 also ensures a desired potential resulting from the exposure of the reference electrode 132 to the pure hydrogen.
Other sensor configurations may be used for any or all of the hydrogen concentration sensors shown in
One feature of the example embodiment hydrogen utilization management system and technique is that it allows for more effectively and efficiently using fuel within a fuel cell power plant. It is possible, for example, to have a higher fuel utilization level while still avoiding fuel starvation events. By knowing the hydrogen utilization on an ongoing basis, it is possible to adjust the performance of the reformer 24, the operation or output of the cell stack assemblies 30,32, or both to maintain an acceptable utilization percentage while avoiding fuel starvation. This provides a significant advance over arrangements that preset a fuel utilization target during installation of a power plant because the utilization changes over time. In order to compensate for such changes, preset operating conditions include a margin of error to accommodate situations that would otherwise result in a fuel starvation event. That margin of error results in under-utilization in some circumstances. With the ongoing monitoring and managing capabilities provided by the illustrated example, better utilization becomes possible and power plant life can be extended because the risk of fuel starvation is reduced or eliminated.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4025412 | LaConti | May 1977 | A |
4051006 | Neti et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4731211 | Lee | Mar 1988 | A |
4766044 | Sederquist | Aug 1988 | A |
4859305 | Schneider et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4859307 | Nishizawa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4895775 | Kato et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5547554 | Kiesele | Aug 1996 | A |
5667653 | Schneider et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5668302 | Finbow et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6168705 | Molter et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6280865 | Eisman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6368735 | Lomax | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376124 | Dodgson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6455181 | Hallum | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6506296 | Babes-Dornea et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6558519 | Dodgson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6638416 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645361 | Bloemer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6977121 | Balliet et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984464 | Margiott et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
8298712 | Stirakawa | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8747635 | Murakami et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771490 | Bordo | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8840775 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8932772 | Kumei et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9410919 | Spong et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
10062915 | Paganelli | Aug 2018 | B2 |
20010051290 | Kashiwagi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020092780 | Nadanami et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030077495 | Scartozzi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030158273 | Kosako | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040028967 | Katsuki et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040182705 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197621 | Balliet | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040261500 | Ng et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050042485 | Murayama | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050153180 | Hsu | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181262 | Vanderleeden et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214603 | Barton | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060032742 | Babes-Dornea et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060073373 | Andrin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080145722 | Coignet et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179199 | Coignet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080223516 | Tanuma | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090004551 | Burdzy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090136793 | Kanno | May 2009 | A1 |
20090166197 | Grincourt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090291342 | Tezuka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100028730 | Ghezel-Ayagh | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110151345 | Lundblad et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20140251834 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140311905 | Stetter et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160171797 | Kim | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170025692 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
207558943 | Jun 2018 | CN |
H05275097 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2000131273 | May 2000 | JP |
2000131273 | May 2000 | JP |
20000131273 | May 2000 | JP |
2005332610 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2005332610 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2009217951 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2014199233 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2015144092 | Aug 2015 | JP |
2015144092 | Aug 2015 | JP |
9409520 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO2008048270 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2011008898 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2018209082 | May 2017 | WO |
2019073850 | Apr 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cosa+Xentaur, Continuous Hydrogen Analyzer, 2004 COSA Instrument Corporation. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/2020/027136 dated Jul. 28, 2020. |
The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/059768, dated Jan. 21, 2020. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2020/027136 dated Nov. 11, 2021. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2021/058217 dated Feb. 8, 2022. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International application No. PCT/US2021/058186 dated Feb. 8, 2022. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection, Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7018973 dated May 31, 2023. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2021/058217 dated Jun. 22, 2023. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International application No. PCT/US2021/058186 dated Jun. 22, 2023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200350605 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |