System for metering and auditing the dots or drops or pulses produced by a digital computer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6318856
  • Patent Number
    6,318,856
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 9, 1999
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 2001
    22 years ago
Abstract
A device in a postage meter that uses dot or drop printing to enhance security. Security is achieved by counting the number of signal pulses that are used to produce ink drops or ink dots that are required to produce the entire document or specific regions of the document. The aforementioned may be accomplished by adding a smart module to digital print head modules. The smart module would capture driver pulses from the print head module and interpret the pulses associated with regions of the image. Thus, the smart module would take data from the printer controller that is used to cut off printing when the ink is consumed and relate “set” values to the drops produced during the production of the document or portions of the document, thereby linking the document to the actual volume of ink produced.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention pertains to digital printing and more particularly to the metering and auditing of the dots or drops produced by a digital printer.




DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART




Printers that print characters in the form of dots have been utilized in postage meters and other devices. The aforementioned printers form characters and/or graphics from a matrix of dots. Unlike the fully formed character printing methods, the printing elements are organized in rows or columns which print dots. A character in a dot printer is formed sequentially by printing at one time all the selected dots, respectively, in a column or a row. Graphics are made possible by precisely positioning dots on a page.




Printers that print characters and graphics by depositing drops of ink on a medium have been utilized in postage meters and other devices. The aforementioned printers form characters and graphics by selectively firing droplets of ink onto a surface. The ink dries upon its absorption into the substance.




Laser printers print characters and graphics by utilizing a focused laser beam and a rotating mirror to draw an image of the desired page on a photosensitive drum. The laser is pulsed periodically or fired periodically to produce small discharged areas on the photosensitive drum that represent the image. The charged image attracts and holds toner. A piece of paper is rolled against the drum while a charged plate behind the paper attracts the toner away from the drum and onto the paper. Heat and/or pressure is then applied to fuse the toner to the paper.




Dot matrix printers print characters. A dot matrix printer may have a 9 or 24 pin head. The pins impact the paper through a ribbon, creating patterns of dots in the shape of letters and numbers in multiple fonts and type sizes.




Thermal matrix printers have an array of 100-200 pins which are placed in contact with thermally sensitive paper. The pins are pulsed or fired with electrical current heating the pins. The heat produced darkens selective areas of the moving paper.




Printers that print by using dots and drops are commercially available as desk top printers and are often utilized as output devices of personal computers. The wide use of the above printers has made it easier to forge documents. Thus, additional security is needed to determine the authenticity of the printed document. One method that has been proposed for providing security is to print encrypted information in the document and decrypting the information at a later time to authenticate the document. One of the disadvantages of the foregoing is that it may be necessary to use a large amount of space on the document to prevent the encrypted information from being decrypted.




Another method that has been proposed for providing security to documents is to print authenticating text in invisible ink on the document to authenticate the document. A luminescent ink may also be used for similar security purposes. One of the disadvantages of the foregoing is that it may be necessary to use special chemicals or an ultraviolet light source to read the authenticating text.




Another method utilized by the prior art for providing security to documents involved the hiding of some information in the document or the modification of some information in the document. The hidden or modified information may be placed in graphics contained in the document. The hidden or modified information was accurately placed so as not to disturb the information. One of the disadvantages of the above is that it is difficult to read the hidden or modified information.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a system that makes it more difficult to print fraudulent documents. The apparatus of this invention provides a device for verifiable security in a postage meter or other devices using dot or drop printing. Security is achieved by counting the number of signal pulses that are used to produce ink drops or ink dots that are required to produce the entire document or specific regions of the document. The aforementioned may be accomplished by adding a smart module to digital print head modules. The smart module would capture driver pulses from the print head module and interpret the pulses associated with regions of the image. Thus, the smart module would take data from the printer controller that is used to cut off printing when the ink is consumed and relate “set” values to the drops produced during the production of the document or portions of the document, thereby linking the document to the actual volume of ink produced.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a drawing of a postal indicia affixed to a mail piece;





FIG. 2

is a drawing in greater detail of region


17


of indicia


11


of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a block drawing showing meter controller


52


connected to printer


25


and information capture module


26


;





FIG. 4

is a block diagram showing meter and printer controller


52


functioning as a meter controller;





FIG. 5

is a flow chart showing how region


17


is formed;





FIG. 6

is a flow chart of the program contained in controller


33


; and also of a portion of the program contained in controller


52


;





FIGS. 7A and 7B

is a flow chart of a portion of the program contained in controller


52


and of the program contained in data center


62


; and





FIG. 8

is a drawing of an Information Based Indicia affixed to a mail piece.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring now to the drawings in detail, and more particularly to

FIG. 1

, the reference character


10


represents a mail piece that has a postal indicia


11


affixed thereto. Indicia


11


has a graphics region


12


and a fixed and variable text region


13


. Region


12


includes a region


17


that is printed with 480 pixels.




Region


13


contains a postal meter serial number


14


, the date


15


, the place the mail piece was mailed from


16


, a dollar amount


18


, and a security code


19


. Indicia


11


may be printed with an ink jet printer, laser printer or thermal printer (not shown). Indicia


11


may be produced by an electronic postage meter.





FIG. 2

is a drawing in greater detail of portion


17


of indicia


11


of FIG.


1


. Region


17


contains 480 pixels or individual identifiable picture elements


20


. Pixels


20


are located at specific spatial coordinates. Upper case coordinates are located along the top edge of region


17


to indicate columns and lower case coordinates are located along a side edge of region


17


to indicate rows. Pixel


21


is located at coordinates (C, f). An ink jet printer may deposit a drop of ink in one or more pixels


20


to produce a picture. One ink jet pulse or one drop of ink is used for each pixel


20


. If 480 drops of ink are placed in region


17


, a black rectangle will be formed.




Column D contains 11 drops of ink which were produced by 11 ink jet pulses. The 11 drops of ink are located in coordinates (D, b), (D, c), (D, f), (D, j), (D, k), (D, m), (D, n), (D, o), (D, s), (D, t), and (D, u). Information may be embedded in the columns of region


17


. For instance, column D may be said to represent 11 units (one unit for each drop of ink). A constant number may be added to or subtracted from the counted units to scale the values or to make it more difficult to determine the information placed in particular columns. For instance, column D may be said to represent 9 units by subtracting the number 2 from the drops of ink in column D.




Column I contains 6 drops of ink which were produced by 6 ink jet pulses. The 6 drops of ink are located in coordinates (I, b), (I, c), (I, l), (I, n), (I, o) and (I, s). Column I represents 4 units of information, i.e. 6−2=4.




Column J contains 2 drops of ink which were produced by 2 ink jet pulses. The 2 drops of ink are located in coordinates (J, b) and (J, c). Column J represents 0 units of information, i.e. 2−2=0.




Column K contains 2 drops of ink which were produced by 2 ink jet pulses. The 2 drops of ink are located in coordinates (K, b) and (K, c). Column K represents 0 units of information, i.e. 2−2=0.




Column L contains 2 drops of ink which were produced by 2 ink jet pulses. The 2 drops of ink are located in coordinates (L, b) and (L, c). Column L represents 0 units of information, i.e. 2−2=0.




Column N contains 5 drops of ink which were produced by 5 ink jet pulses. The 5 drops of ink are located in coordinates (N, b), (N, c), (N, d), (N, s), (N, t). Column N represents 3 units of information, i.e. 5−2=3.




The amount of postage


18


indicated by indicia


11


of

FIG. 1

, namely $0.349 is indicated in the columns and rows of region


17


to make it more difficult to produce fraudulent indicia. The tens of dollar value of the amount of postage


18


is indicated by column L, i.e., 0, and the dollar value is indicated by column K, i.e., 0. The tenths of cents value of the amount of postage


18


is indicated by column N, i.e., 3 and the cents value is indicated by column I, i.e., 4. The tenths of cents value of the amount of postage


18


is indicated by column D, i.e., 9. Thus, columns L, K, N, I and D indicate that $00.349 was paid for postage. Additional drops of ink or ink jet pulses will be added to or subtracted from columns L,K,N,I and D to indicate the amount of postage


18


(FIG.


1


). The manner in which the foregoing is accomplished is described in the graphical encoding routines


61


of

FIG. 4. A

thresholding process is typically used for the encoding of information into region


17


. Whether or not the value of a particular pixel


20


should be counted is determined by using a value of 1 to 2% from 0 or white. It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that the amount of postage may also be encoded in the rows of region


17


.





FIG. 3

is a block drawing of meter and printer controller


52


functioning as a printer controller.

FIG. 3

shows a print module


25


and an information capture module


26


. Print module


25


comprises: a meter and print controller


52


; an ink jet assembly


28


; an ink jet array transport


29


; a mail piece transport


30


; a print image buffer


31


; and an ink supply


32


that is coupled to ink jet assembly


28


. Print controller


52


is coupled to ink jet assembly


28


, ink jet array transport


29


, mail piece transport


30


, print image buffer


31


, and ink jet assembly


28


. Information capture module


26


comprises: droplet image value capture controller


33


; image cell row/column coordinates Read Only Memory


34


; capture drop value routines Read Only Memory


35


; compute drop Read Only Memory


49


; processing buffer Random Access Memory


85


, and drop value storage non-volatile memory


36


. Processor


33


is coupled to ROM


34


, drop value routines ROM


35


, drop value non-volatile storage memory


36


, ROM


49


, process buffer Random Access Memory


85


and meter and print controller


52


. It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that either a laser printer or other digital printers may be used instead of ink jet assembly


28


and ink supply


32


to apply postage to an envelope, label or post card.




When one wants to print indicia


11


on mail piece


10


(FIG.


1


), one places mail piece


10


in the mail piece transport


30


and sets the correct postage value in electronic meter


50


(FIG.


4


), i.e. $0.349. Print image input data will then be transferred from print image buffer


31


to meter and print controller


52


. The print image input data will include all of the information that is necessary to print indicia


11


. The above information will include the information that is required to print region


17


of indicia


11


. Controller


52


will cause mail piece transport


30


to move mail piece


10


under ink jet assembly


28


back and forth and ink jet array transport


29


to move ink jet assembly


28


to deposit ink drops


42


on mail piece


10


to form indicia


11


. As the printing process proceeds, controller


52


also provides position data via line


38


and droplet data via line


39


to controller


33


. Controller


52


will transmit the position data for region


17


of indicia


11


to droplet image value capture processor


33


via line


38


. Controller


52


will transmit the droplet data for region


17


of indicia


11


to droplet image value capture processor


33


via line


39


, and controller


52


will provide a data clock signal to processor


33


via line


40


. At the appropriate time, controller


33


will obtain the row and column coordinates of region


17


from ROM


34


. The routines in ROM


35


are used to capture the number of drops in columns D, I, J, K, L, and N (

FIG. 2

) and to temporarily store the number of drops in the columns in non-volatile memory


36


. Controller


33


utilizes the computational routines in ROM


49


to calculate the postage value represented by the number of drops in columns D, I, J, K, L, and N. Thus, memory


36


will store the dollar amount of postage


18


indicated in indicia


11


(FIG.


1


). Controller


33


will transmit the number of drops in columns D, I, J, K, L, and N, and their locations and the number and locations of the other drops in region


17


to controller


52


via line


41


.





FIG. 4

is a block diagram showing meter and printer controller


52


functioning as a meter controller. Controller


52


will transmit the number of drops in columns D, I, J, K, L, and N and their locations to drops to value converter


59


via line


43


. Electronic meter


50


includes meter routines


51


, meter and print controller


52


, fixed graphic image Read Only Memory


53


, modem


54


, compose indicia image routines


55


, clock calendar non-volatile memory and battery


86


, I/O routines


101


, I/O ports, keyboard and display


141


and buffer memory


87


. Controller


52


is coupled to modem


54


, I/O routines


101


and meter routines


51


, I/O port keyboard and display


141


. A postage verifying module


65


is coupled to electronic meter


50


. Module


65


includes: a current indicia value buffer


57


that is coupled to controller


52


; a comparator


58


that is coupled to buffer


57


and controller


52


, graphic value buffer


88


that is coupled to comparator


58


; a drops to value buffer and converter


59


that is coupled to buffer


88


; an incident, non-volatile memory buffer


60


that is coupled to comparator


58


and to controller


52


; encoding module


137


includes graphic encoding routines


61


and variable graphic base image ROM


89


. Graphics encoding routines


61


are coupled to controller


52


and ROM


89


is coupled to controller


52


. Modem


54


is coupled to meter refill data center


62


. Postal scale


100


is coupled to I/O ports keyboard and display


141


.




Meter


50


begins to function when a user sets the postage dollar amount


18


(

FIG. 1

) by weighing mail piece


10


on scale


100


. Alternatively, the user may enter the weight of mail piece


10


into I/O ports, keyboard and display


141


of meter


50


. The weight and amount of postage for mail piece


10


is displayed by meter


50


. Controller


52


will compose an image of indicia


11


(

FIG. 1

) using the fixed graphic images from ROM


53


and using encoding routines


61


. The above image will be stored in print image buffer


31


. Buffer


31


will provide the above image to meter controller


52


. Upon completion of region


17


of indicia


11


, the drop values stored in non violate memory


36


may be transferred by controller


33


via line


41


to controller


52


. Controller


52


will also transfer the above values via line


43


to value converter


59


. Process controller


52


detects the drop information deposited in converter


59


and initiates conversion of the drop information to postal value. Controller


52


stores the value produced by converter


59


in buffer


88


. The value stored in buffer


88


is compared by comparator


58


to the value stored in buffer


57


. A match causes no output. A mismatch causes the difference between the value in buffer


88


and buffer


57


to be stored in buffer


60


. When buffers


57


and


88


do not have the same value, there exists the possibility of fraud or a micro processor malfunction. Meter routines


51


will handle the accounting functions of meter


50


. Routines


51


are not being described, because one skilled in the art is aware of their operation and function.




Modem


54


communicates with meter data center


62


during a refill of postage meter


50


by exchanging funds and the difference in value between buffers


57


and


88


is stored in buffer


60


so that possible fraud may be investigated.





FIG. 5

is a flow chart showing how region


17


is formed. The program begins in decision block


125


. Block


125


determines whether or not a graphic encoding request has been received from meter controller


52


. If block


125


determines that a graphic encoding request has not been received, the program goes back to the input of block


125


. If block


125


determines that a graphic encoding request has been received, the program goes to the input of block


126


. Block


126


reads the amount of postage that was set in meter


50


by the user, i.e., $0.349. Then the program goes to block


127


to compute each decimal value for the number of pixels in columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


(FIG.


2


). Now the program goes to block


128


to store the value obtained in block


127


in the buffer of block


128


. At this point the program goes to block


129


to read the base graphic cell (the remaining columns of region


17


). The base graphic cell is then stored in the buffer in block


130


.




At this point, the program goes to block


131


to adjust the value carrying graphic column heights i.e., the heights of columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


(FIG.


2


). The aforementioned heights are adjusted by using the values stored in the buffer of block


128


and checking that the number of pixels in columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


(

FIG. 2

) match the decimal values of the pixels indicated by the buffer of block


128


i.e., $0.349 postage is represented by the pixels of columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


. Now the program goes to block


132


to adjust all of the remaining columns of region


17


in order to make the graphic in region


17


pleasing to the human eye. Then the program goes to block


133


to begin the validation process. The validation process will read all the value bearing columns, i.e., columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


in the modified base cell, and convert the column counts to decimal values. Now the program goes to decision block


134


. Block


134


determines whether or not the value determined in block


133


matches the decimal value stored in the buffer of block


128


. If block


134


determines that the value determined in block


133


does not match the value stored in the buffer of block


128


, the program knows that a mistake was made and the program goes to block


99


retry and to block


136


. Block


136


will clear the buffers in blocks


128


and


130


. Then the program will go back to the input of block


125


. If block


134


determines that the value determined in block


133


matches the value stored in the buffer of block


128


, the program knows that a mistake was not made, and the program goes to the input of block


135


. Block


135


adds the edited base cell (region


17


) to the full indicia


11


(regions


12


and


13


). The foregoing result is stored in the buffer of block


137


. The program also goes to block


136


to clear the buffers in blocks


128


and


130


. Then the program will go back to the input of block


125


.





FIG. 6

is a flow chart of the program contained in controller


33


and a portion of the program contained in controller


52


. The Input to block


145


is received from controller


62


. Decision block


145


determines whether or not the printing that is going to take place (

FIG. 5

) has begun. If block


145


determines that the printing has not begun, the program goes back to the input of block


145


. If block


145


determines that the printing has begun, the program goes to the input of block


146


. Block


146


reads the stored locations of the encoded value by column and row. Then the program goes to block


147


. For the six identified columns i.e., columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


, block


147


sums the sensed print head pixel or drop firings transferred by line


39


(

FIG. 3

) from the start of a row to the end of a row for each of the six columns. Then block


147


stores the column sum for each of the six columns in the buffer in block


148


. Now the program goes to decision block


149


. Block


149


determines whether or not the printing has ended. If block


149


determines that the printing has not ended, the program goes back to the input of block


149


. If block


149


determines that the printing has ended, the program goes to the input of block


160


. In block


150


controller


33


(

FIG. 3

) reads the values stored in the buffer in block


148


and converts the values to a status message that Is transferred to the drop to value converter


59


(

FIG. 4

) block


151


(FIG.


7


). Then the program goes to block


152


where the drop values are converted to a postal value. The postal value is stored in buffer


88


(

FIG. 4

) block


153


buffer.




At this point the program goes to block


154


. Block


154


triggers comparator


58


(FIG.


4


). Then the program goes to decision block


155


. Block


155


determines whether or not the value in the buffer in block


128


equals the value in the buffer in block


153


. in other words, does the postage set by the user of meter


50


equal the coded value of the postage indicated in columns D, I, J, K, L and N of region


17


, i.e.: does the value in buffer


57


equal the value in buffer


88


? If block


155


determines that the value of the buffer in block


128


equals the value of the buffer in block


153


, the program goes to block


157


to reset the buffers in blocks


148


,


151


, and


153


. Then the program goes back to the input of block


145


. If block


155


determines that the value of the buffer in block


128


does not equal the value of the buffer in block


153


, the program goes to block


156


.




Block


156


will transfer the value of the buffer in block


128


and the value of the buffer in block


153


and the date and time to the Special Refill buffer in block


161


.




Now the program will go to decision block


157


. Block


157


will determine whether or not the value stored in the buffer of block


128


differs from the value stored in the buffer of block


153


by an amount greater than $10.00. If block


153


determines that the amount is less than $10.00, the program will go to block


157


to reset buffers


148


,


151


, and


153


. Then the program will go back to the input of block


145


. If block


153


determines that the amount is over $10.00, the program goes to block


159


to display the error to display a call service message. Then the program goes to block


160


and halts.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

is a flow chart of a portion of the program contained in controller


52


and the program contained in data center


62


. The input to block


165


comes from meter controller


52


. Decision block


165


determines whether or not the user of meter


50


has requested that additional funds be added to the vault (not shown) of meter


50


. If block


165


determines that no additional funds have been requested by the user of meter


50


, the program goes back to the input of block


165


. If block


165


determines that the user of meter


50


has requested that additional funds be added to the vault, the program goes to block


166


. Block


166


connects meter


50


to data center


62


and starts the standard meter refill process (which is well-known in the art).




At this point, the program goes to decision block


167


. Block


167


determines whether or not the special refill buffer in block


161


contains any data. If block


167


determines that the buffer in block


161


does not contain any data, the program goes to block


168


to complete the meter refill process. Then the program goes back to the input of block


165


. If block


167


determines that the buffer in block


161


contains data, the program goes to block


169


to transfer to data center


62


the postage value as set by the user and the postage value as printed on mail piece


10


, i.e.: $0.349 plus the date and time from the special refill buffer in block


161


.




Then the program goes to the input of decision block


170


(FIG.


7


B). Block


170


determines whether or not the special refill buffer in block


161


contains data. If block


170


determines that the buffer (not shown) in data center


62


does not contain data, the program goes to block


171


to continue the standard meter refill process. Now the program goes to the input of decision block


172


(FIG.


7


A). Block


172


determines whether or not to continue the standard meter refill process. If block


172


determines to continue the refill process, the program goes to block


168


to continue the refill process. Then the program goes back to the input of block


165


.




If decision block


170


(

FIG. 7B

) determines that the special refill buffer in block


161


contains data, the program goes to block


176


to review the meter refill history file for prior special refill buffer entries. Then the program goes to decision block


177


. Block


177


determines whether or not there are any prior special refill buffer entries in block


161


. If block


177


determines that there were prior entries in block


161


, the program goes to block


178


to stop the meter refill process and format a cancel command and recovery instructions for the display of meter


50


(FIG.


4


). Then the program goes back to the input of decision block


172


(FIG.


7


A).




If block


172


determines not to continue the meter refill process, the program goes to block


173


to store the special refill buffer data in the buffer in data center


62


(not shown). At this point, the program goes to block


174


to transfer a special data center


62


(

FIG. 4

) error command and cancel the meter refill process. Then the program goes to block


175


to display the data center


62


error message on the display of meter


50


notifying the user of the cancellation of the refill process.




If block


177


determines that there are no prior special refill buffer entries in block


161


, the program will go to block


179


to store the new special refill buffer entries. Then the program will go to block


171


.





FIG. 8

is a drawing of an Information Based Indicia affixed to mail piece


10


. Indicia


91


has a graphic region


92


, a fixed and variable text region


93


and a two dimensional bar code


90


. Region


92


includes a region


17


that is printed with 480 pixels. Region


93


contains a postal meter serial number


94


, the date


95


, the place the mail piece was mailed from


96


, and a dollar amount


98


.




Indicia


91


may be produced by a personal computer, a printer combined with either a postal security device attached to the personal computer (personal computer postage meter) or a postal security device coupled to a personal computer via a data center and a printer (virtual postage meter).




The above specification describes a new and improved apparatus for providing security to documents by metering and auditing the number of dots or drops used to produce the document or regions of the document. It is realized that the above description may indicate to those skilled in the art additional ways in which the principals of this invention may be used without departing from the spirit. It is, therefore, intended that this invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A postage meter that produces a postal indicia, said postal indicia comprises:a text region that indicates postage that has been paid; a graphic region that has at least one graphic containing a plurality of pixels, wherein the plurality of pixels form a code that indicates the amount of postage that has been paid, wherein the pixels that comprise the graphic are arranged in columns and rows, and the amount of postage paid is coded by the pixels in the columns, wherein a portion of one of the columns is coded by the pixels to indicate tens of dollars of postage paid; a portion of one of the columns is coded by the pixels to indicate dollars of postage paid; a portion of one of the columns is coded by the pixels to indicate tens of cents of postage paid; a portion of one of the columns is coded by the pixels to indicate the number of cents of postage paid; and a portion of one of the columns is coded by the pixels to indicate tenths of cents of postage paid, wherein the meter includes a printer that produces one or more pulses for each pixel printed, wherein the meter includes a counter that respectively counts: the number of pulses produced to form the coded tens of dollars of postage; the number of pulses produced to form the coded dollars of postage; the number of pulses produced to form the coded tens of cents of postage; the number of pulses produced to form the coded cents of postage; and the number of pulses produced to form the coded tenths of cents of postage.
  • 2. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter includes a vault that stores the amount of postage paid, and a comparator that compares the amount of postage paid with the amount of postage paid indicated by the coded pixels.
  • 3. The meter claimed in claim 2, further including:a memory that stores a cumulative differences in postage indicated by the comparator.
  • 4. The meter claimed in claim 3, further including:a locking mechanism that prevents the meter from printing additional indicia when the cumulative differences in postage reach a specified value.
  • 5. The meter claimed in claim 3, wherein the meter uploads the differences in postage stored in the memory to a data center during a meter refill.
  • 6. The meter claimed in claim 5, wherein the data center includes means for notifying the postal authorities when the cumulative differences in postage reach a specified value.
  • 7. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter includes a printer that produces one or more printing ink jet pulses for each pixel printed by a drop of ink.
  • 8. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter includes a counter that respectively counts: the number of printing pulses produced to form the coded tens of dollars of postage; the number of printing pulses produced to form the coded dollars of postage; the number of printing pulses produced to form the coded tens of cents of postage; the number of printing pulses produced to form the coded cents of postage; and the number of printing pulses produced to form the coded tenths of cents of postage.
  • 9. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter includes a vault that stores the amount of postage paid, and a comparator that compares the amount of postage paid with the amount of postage paid indicated by the coded pixels.
  • 10. The meter claimed in claim 1, further including:a memory that stores the cumulative differences in postage indicated by the comparator.
  • 11. The meter claimed in claim 1, further including:a locking mechanism that prevents the meter from printing additional indicia when the cumulative differences in postage reach a specified value.
  • 12. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein possible fraud is indicated if the postage indicated by the text region is not the same as the postage indicated by the plurality of pixels that form a code.
  • 13. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter is an electronic postage meter.
  • 14. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter is a personal computer and a postal security device.
  • 15. The meter claimed in claim 1, wherein the meter is a virtual meter.
  • 16. A postage meter that produces a postal indicia, said postal indicia comprises:a text region that indicates postage that has been paid; and a graphic region that has at least one graphic containing a plurality of pixels, wherein the plurality of pixels form a code that indicates the amount of postage that has been paid, wherein the pixels that comprise the graphic are arranged in columns and rows and the amount of postage paid is coded by the pixels in one or more of the rows, a portion of one of the rows is coded by the pixels to indicate tens of dollars of postage paid; a portion of one of the rows is coded by the pixels to indicate dollars of postage paid; a portion of one of the rows is coded by the pixels to indicate tens of cents of postage paid; a portion of one of the rows is coded by the pixels to indicate number of cents of postage paid; and a portion of one of the rows is coded by the pixels to indicate tenths of cents of postage paid, wherein the meter includes a printer that produces one or more pulses for each pixel printed; and wherein the meter includes a counter that respectively counts: the number of pulses produced to form the coded tens of dollars of postage; the number of pulses produced to form the coded dollars of postage; the number of pulses produced to form the coded tens of cents of postage; the number of pulses produced to form the coded cents of postage; and the number of pulses produced to form the coded tenths of cents of postage.
  • 17. The meter claimed in claim 16, wherein the meter includes a vault that stores the amount of postage paid, and a comparator that compares the amount of postage paid with the amount of postage paid indicated by the coded pixels.
  • 18. The meter claimed in claim 16, further including:a memory that stores the cumulative differences in postage indicated by the comparator.
  • 19. The meter claimed in claim 16, further including:a locking mechanism that prevents the meter from printing additional indicia when the cumulative differences in postage reach a specified value.
  • 20. The meter claimed in claim 16, wherein possible fraud is indicated if the postage indicated by the text region is not the same as the postage indicated by the plurality of pixels that form a code.
  • 21. The meter claimed in claim 16, wherein the meter is an electronic postage meter.
  • 22. The meter claimed in claim 16, wherein the meter is a personal computer and a postal security device.
  • 23. The meter claimed in claim 16, wherein the meter is a virtual meter.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Reference is made to commonly assigned copending patent application Ser. No. 09/458,231 filed herewith entitled “A System That Meters the Firings Of a Printer to Audit the Dots or Drops or Pulses Produced by a Digital Printer” in the name of Ronald P. Sansone, and Ser. No. 09/458,237 filed herewith entitled “A System for Metering and Auditing the Dots or Drops or Pulses Produced by a Digital Printer in Printing an Arbitrary Graphic” in the names of Ronald P. Sansone and Judith A. Martin.

US Referenced Citations (13)
Number Name Date Kind
4121222 Diebold et al. Oct 1978
4413264 Cruz-Uribe et al. Nov 1983
4455562 Dolan et al. Jun 1984
4813912 Chickneas et al. Mar 1989
4872027 Buskirk et al. Oct 1989
5049898 Arthur et al. Sep 1991
5068806 Gatten Nov 1991
5414452 Accatino et al. May 1995
5513563 Berson May 1996
5524995 Brookner et al. Jun 1996
5694156 Hoisington et al. Dec 1997
5699257 Emmett et al. Dec 1997
5793388 Martinson et al. Aug 1998