Embodiments herein relate to apparatus and methodologies for providing laser sources, and more particularly to methods for tuning lasers to achieve single-frequency operation.
Many laser applications, particularly those in the field of laser spectroscopy and coherent laser combining, require stable single transverse and longitudinal mode operation of a laser, which is often referred to as “single-frequency operation”. In some applications, the need for single transverse mode operation is a consequence of strict requirements on beam shape, while single longitudinal mode operation is needed to avoid mode beating and provide stable continuous wave operation. Additionally, the transverse modes of a beam can have different resonance frequencies than the fundamental mode, or be phase-shifted therefrom due to Gouy phase shift, which can also result in mode beating.
Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS), a powerful method for measuring concentrations of trace constituents in a gas mixture, for example the trace chemicals present in human breath, is an example of an application requiring single-frequency operation. The CRDS technique requires a laser source capable of emitting a pulsed or continuous wave and sequentially producing numerous lines with narrow linewidth, and a laser cavity/resonator with highly reflective mirrors to enable decay time measurements of each laser line inside the cavity. The gas mixture to be analyzed is then introduced into the cavity and the decay time of the laser lines can be measured and compared against the known decay time for an empty cavity. The analysis of decay times enables the identification and quantification of constituents in the gas mixture.
The CRDS technique works best with a tunable single-frequency laser source with a narrow linewidth. One method of resonance line selection is utilizing a rotatable intra-cavity diffraction grating that selects one spectral region that is fed back into the resonator, which in turn outputs a laser beam of the selected frequency spectrum. The output beam may be a single lowest-order mode emission, or some mode mixing may take place. Frequently, the extra modes are transverse modes which are excited and have not been excluded due to the line selection method, such as the diffraction grating, not being sufficiently fine-tuned for excluding them.
Existing methods for obtaining single-frequency operation such as Master Oscillator Power Amplifiers (MOPA) or injection-locked lasers are complex, expensive, and difficult to use. Methods requiring intra-cavity elements to filter out higher-order modes, such as using a hard aperture, result in loss of power of the resultant beam and are not suitable for a broad wavelength range. Single-mode fibers provide another means for achieving single-mode operation. However, their availability is severely limited for some wavelengths, for example, in the mid infra-red range.
Methods such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,324,191 (the '191 Patent), aimed for ophthalmic surgery, teach a means to achieve single transverse mode operation of a passively mode-locked Nd3+-doped glass laser. In the '191 Patent, single-frequency operation is obtained by detecting a beat-note in the emitted laser beam to determine the co-existence of modes therein, and advancing a straight edge towards the center of the beam until beat-note frequencies are no longer detected, thus indicating the successful suppression of higher-order transverse modes. The mode suppression method taught in the '191 Patent is based on preferential losses between transverse modes, and therefore makes the output power smaller, which is an undesirable effect. Further, the said method is intrinsically multi-frequency, and does not provide true single-frequency operation, as the use of a straight edge to suppress transverse modes cannot completely isolate the fundamental mode, due to the close spacing of the fundamental and transverse modes.
There is a need for a method and apparatus that provides true single-frequency operation in an economical, easy-to-use manner, and with a minimal loss of output power.
According to the present apparatus and methodologies, a system for tuning the parameters of a laser beam are provided, the system operative to produce and maintain single-frequency operation of the laser beam. Herein, the present apparatus and methodologies enable adjustment of the length of the laser beam cavity of the laser system by detecting a beat-note of the emitted laser beam and/or by calculating a mode purity value therefrom. Adjusting the length of the present laser cavity enables tuning of the present system such that overlap of gain bandwidth of a gain medium with a specific lowest-order mode of the laser cavity is optimized in order to obtain pure lowest order transverse and longitudinal mode operation. In some embodiments, tuning of the present system (i.e. adjustment of the cavity length) may be occur in real-time to maintain single-frequency operation of the system.
In some embodiments, the methods comprise providing a laser for emitting a laser beam within the cavity, wherein the length of the cavity may be adjusted to one of a plurality of cavity lengths; emitting the laser beam at each one of the plurality of cavity lengths; providing a detector, operably coupled to a computer, for: receiving at least a portion of the laser beam emitted at each one of the plurality of cavity lengths; detecting the presence of transverse modes, longitudinal modes, or both, in the received laser beam emitted at each one of the plurality of cavity lengths and when at least transverse modes, longitudinal modes, or both, are detected, generating at least one laser beam signal having a beat-note indicative thereof; and selecting, based upon the generated at least one laser beam signals, at least one cavity lengths for eliminating the beat-note and producing single-frequency operation of the laser beam; and adjusting the length of the cavity one of the one or more selected cavity lengths.
Detecting the presence of transverse modes, longitudinal modes, or both, comprises detecting a frequency difference of the transverse modes, the longitudinal modes, or both, wherein the frequency difference comprises the difference between the transverse modes, longitudinal modes, or both, across approximately one free spectral range within the cavity.
In other embodiments, the method further comprises calculating a mode purity value by combining a detected amplitude of the beat-note in the generated laser beam signal (AC portion) with a detected intensity of the generated laser beam signal (DC portion), and adjusting the length of the cavity to the highest mode purity value.
In yet other embodiments, the present system comprises a laser for emitting a laser beam, the laser beam emitted in a laser cavity having a first end and a second end, and having a length, the cavity comprising at least, a diffraction grating, positioned at the first end of the cavity, for providing a mirror within the cavity, an output coupler, positioned at the second end of the cavity, wherein the distance between the diffraction grating and the output coupler defines the length of the cavity, and a gain medium, positioned between the diffraction grating and the output coupler, a laser beam splitter for receiving and dividing the emitted laser beam and for directing at least a portion of the divided laser beam to a laser beam detector, a laser beam detector, for receiving and detecting the directed portion of the emitted laser beam from the laser beam splitter, and for generating at least one signal indicative thereof, an actuator, for actuating at least the diffraction grating, the output coupler, or both, to adjust the length of the cavity to produce a single-frequency operation of the laser.
According to embodiments herein, apparatus and methodologies for tuning the parameters of a laser system are provided, such tuning operative to provide or produce single-frequency operation of a laser beam generated by the system, and to maintain such single-frequency while the laser system is in use. As will be described in more detail, the present apparatus and methodologies can adjust the length of the laser beam cavity of the laser system by detecting a beat-note of the emitted laser beam and by calculating a mode purity value therefrom. Adjusting the length of the present laser cavity enables tuning of the present system such that overlap of gain bandwidth of a gain medium with a specific lowest-order mode of the laser cavity is optimized in order to obtain pure lowest order transverse and longitudinal mode operation. The present apparatus and methodologies will now be described having regard to
Having regard to
In some embodiments, the present laser beam cavity 12 comprises a diffraction grating 14, positioned at a first (rear) end of the cavity 12, serving as the rear mirror of the cavity 12, and an output coupler 16, positioned at a second opposite end of the cavity 12. The distance between diffraction grating 14 and output coupler 16 defines the length L of the cavity 12. Laser cavity 12 further comprises a gain medium 13, positioned between diffraction grating 14 and output coupler 16, serving to amplify energy from a laser pump (not shown) to generate the output laser beam 11.
The present laser cavity 12 may be operably coupled to a laser beam splitter 20 for splitting (i.e. dividing) laser beam 11 into a first test beam 21 for use according to embodiments herein (i.e. for detection by a laser beam detector), and a second main beam 23 for use in applications such as CRDS. Laser cavity 12 may be further operably coupled to a laser beam detector 22 (e.g. a fast photodetector) for detecting first beam 21 from splitter 20 and for measuring the power/intensity and frequency thereof (as described in more detail below). In some embodiments, detector 22 may comprise a bandwidth that exceeds a pre-determined or expected beat-note signal frequency for beam 21. For example, it should be understood that, for CO2 lasers emitting at specific frequencies, the highest expected beat frequency would be the difference in the frequency between two adjacent emissions frequencies. As such, it is contemplated that a suitable detector 22 may comprise a bandwidth in the order of the free spectral range (FSR) of the laser cavity/resonator 12 (e.g. 1 GHz). Preferably, in practice, in the case of free-space resonators where the modes are orthogonal, detector 22 may have a small surface area, or clip the beam 21, as full spatial integration of the beam 21 could result in vanishing of the overlap integral due to orthogonality of modes, thus eliminating the beat-note signal generated by the mixing of the modes. In response to the first beam 21 being detected, detector 22 may generate a detected signal 25 therefrom (represented by dashed lines), wherein the signal 25 may be digitized by a digitizer 24 (such as an acquisition card) and analyzed by a computer 26. As below, the present system, in whole or in part, may be operably coupled to computer 26, such that the entire system or components thereof may be automated.
The present system will now be described in operation having regard to the Examples provided below.
Generally, the present apparatus and methodologies serve to adjust the length L of cavity 12 as a means for tuning the present system to obtain the lowest-order transverse and longitudinal mode of operation. Herein, diffraction grating 14 can be rotatable about an axis x, enabling a particular frequency of laser beam 11 to be selected through resonance with output coupler 16. The particular frequency could be a mixture of frequencies (e.g. close in range but not identical) comprising the fundamental mode TEM00p and various higher-order transverse modes TEMmnp. The existence of transverse and/or longitudinal modes in the beam 11/21 will result in a beat-note in the detected signal 25 generated therefrom. Where a beat-note may be present, the length L of the cavity 12 can be adjusted to eliminate said beat-note so as to achieve single-frequency operation (i.e. to maximize a mode purity value calculated from the laser beam 21 being detected). Moreover, the detected laser beam signal 25 can also be used to dynamically tune the laser beam 11 in real-time, thereby counteracting frequency shifts due to temperature variation and/or vibration and maintain single-frequency operation.
It should be understood that the length L of cavity 12 can be adjusted by moving output coupler 16 substantially longitudinally along the axis z, such movement imparted on the coupler 16 by any means known in the art. For example, an actuator 18, such as a piezoelectric actuator controlled by a piezo driver 17, may be provided to translate coupler 16 along axis z (increasing or decreasing length L). According to other embodiments, diffraction grating 14 may be moved longitudinally along axis z to adjust length L of cavity 12, although it should be appreciated that adjusting grating 14 both rotatably and longitudinally could add a degree of complexity to the system 10.
It should further be understood that the ability to adjust the length L of cavity 12 by at least one free spectral range (FSR) of the cavity 12 enables the tuning of the present system 10 to obtain pure lowest-order transverse and longitudinal mode operation. As will be described, an optimal cavity length L can be determined by detecting a beat-note of emitted laser beam 11, and calculating a mode purity value therefrom, for various cavity lengths L over one FSR of the cavity 12. In some embodiments, the cavity length L providing minimal beat-note and a greatest mode purity value can be selected in order to optimize single-frequency operation of the system 10.
Beat-Note Signal Detection and Processing
As above, the existence of a beat-note in the detected signal 25 generated in response to at least a portion of laser beam 11 is a result of the frequency difference of the constituent modes of the beam, in particular the frequency difference between transverse modes TEMmnp within the same FSR of the cavity/resonator 12. For example, in a cavity 12 with two identical spherical mirrors, the resonance frequencies υmnp of the cavity 12 are given by:
where L=z2-z1 is the length of the cavity 12, Ψ(z)=arctan(z/zr) is the Gouy phase shift, zr is the Rayleigh length of the resultant beam 11, and (m, n) are the transverse mode indices and p is the longitudinal mode index. When a transverse mode TEMmnp is present in the at least one portion of the beam 11 together with the fundamental mode TEM00p, a beat-note signal can arise in the output intensity of the beam 11 due to coherent combining of the two modes. Additional transverse modes combine in the same manner and contribute to the beat-note signal. Where detector 22 comprises a sufficiently fast response time, i.e. a bandwidth greater than the maximum expected frequency of the beat-note signal, the presence of a beat-note can be detected and used to determine the position of single-frequency operation.
In some circumstances, analyzing the beat-note of the detected signal 25 alone may not provide the position of the single-frequency operation. For example, where accidental degeneracies exist for the resonance frequencies of several modes, the beat-note of the detected signal 25 may be nonexistent, but the competition between the multiple modes lowers the output power. In such cases, amplitude of the beat-note (AC component) of the detected signal 25 can be combined with the overall intensity (DC component) of the signal 25 to optimize cavity length L to provide purest mode operation. Typically, the DC portion of the detected signal 25 is indicative of the beam power and/or intensity, whereas the AC portion, i.e. the beat-note, is indicative of the degree of mode mixing. The relative strength of the AC portion can be determined by a variety of means which include, but are not limited to, peak-to-peak voltage, variance or standard deviation of the signal. Since TEM00p has a stronger signal (i.e. greater intensity) relative to higher order transverse modes TEMmnp due to better overlap with the bandwidth of the gain medium 13, and is often the desired mode, the cavity length L of highest mode purity can be identified by finding the length L of highest overall intensity and lowest beat-note amplitude.
To obtain a more straightforward representation of mode purity, the AC component can be normalized to the DC component to quantify a mode purity value of the emitted beam, as described in further detail below.
Mode Purity Value
A mode purity of laser beam 11 is inversely correlated with the number of longitudinal and transverse modes that exist in the first beam 21, and can be quantified by determining a mode purity value obtained from the AC and DC portions of the detected signal 25 generated in response to said beam 21. More specifically, a mode purity value can be determined by the ratio R of the overall signal (the DC component) with respect to the strength of the detected beat signal (the AC component). Various definitions can be used for the AC and DC components of the beat signal. For example, the ratio R can be one of the following:
where Vave is the average voltage and Vpp is peak-to-peak voltage;
where Vave is the average voltage and VRMS is the root mean square of the voltage; or
where Vave is the average voltage and Vσis the standard deviation of the voltage.
As one of skill in the art would understand, the above ratios are for exemplary purposes only, and other parameters could be used to produce a suitable mode purity value.
The above formulae demonstrate that the position corresponding with the highest mode purity value is the position where the AC portion of the detected signal 25 is weakest and the DC portion is strongest. Accordingly, a true single-frequency operation of the present system 10 can be obtained by scanning the emitted beam 21 by detector 22 through all of the cavity lengths L/output coupler 16 positions over at least one FSR of the cavity 12, calculating a mode purity value for each position using the formulae above, and selecting the cavity length L corresponding to the highest mode purity value.
Alternatively, the presence of the beat-note frequencies can also be detected by frequency-domain analysis of the detected signal 25, such as by taking the Fourier transform of the detected signal 25. The output coupler position/cavity length L corresponding to highest mode purity can be identified by the lowest frequency domain signal.
In embodiments, a normalized AC signal, or a representation thereof, could be used as an error signal to indicate mode mixing, which is fed back to the computer 26. The computer 26 may then be operable to activate actuator 28 to translate output coupler 16, adjusting the length L, to reduce the error signal until a threshold value is achieved, said threshold value being selected as being indicative that single-frequency operation of the system 10 has been achieved.
Example Use of Method
In operation, apparatus and methods for producing single-frequency operation of the present example laser system 10 are provided. Initially, output coupler 16 may be cycled through each of its positions across at least one FSR of the cavity/resonator 12 such that detector 22 generates a detected signal 25 from the first beam 21 at each of the said positions. The detected signal 25 is then digitized by digitizer 24 and fed into computer 26, which calculates a mode purity value for each coupler position/cavity length L using the method described above, and adjusts the position of output coupler 16 to the position corresponding with the highest mode purity value.
In this case, the mode purity value R for an output coupler 16 position/cavity length L is given by the average signal, shown as intensity in
As mentioned above, a Fourier transform of the detected signal 25 can also be used to determine the position of highest mode purity.
In embodiments, once the optimal mode purity, and thus single-frequency operation, has been achieved by the previously described method, the laser system 10 can be dynamically adjusted to maintain single-frequency operation even when there are fluctuations due to temperature, vibrations, etc. by monitoring the first beam 21, calculating the mode purity in real-time, and adjusting the position of the output coupler 16 to maintain maximum mode purity during operation of the laser.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/920,212, filed Mar. 13, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/470,544, filed on Mar. 13, 2017, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3431514 | Harris | Mar 1969 | A |
3453557 | Tobias | Jul 1969 | A |
3517330 | Doyle | Jun 1970 | A |
3534289 | Clark | Oct 1970 | A |
3596201 | Chester | Jul 1971 | A |
3628173 | Danielmeyer | Dec 1971 | A |
3733129 | Bridges | May 1973 | A |
4197513 | Bell | Apr 1980 | A |
4410271 | Matthews | Oct 1983 | A |
4468773 | Seaton | Aug 1984 | A |
4475199 | Sanders | Oct 1984 | A |
4648714 | Benner et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4672618 | Wijntjes | Jun 1987 | A |
4779279 | Brown | Oct 1988 | A |
4784486 | Van Wagenen et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4964132 | Fischer | Oct 1990 | A |
5014278 | Deki | May 1991 | A |
5029174 | Anderson | Jul 1991 | A |
5054027 | Goodberlet | Oct 1991 | A |
5091912 | Bretenaker | Feb 1992 | A |
5135304 | Miles et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5465728 | Phillips | Nov 1995 | A |
5528040 | Lehmann | Jun 1996 | A |
5573005 | Ueda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5646952 | Whittley | Jul 1997 | A |
5815277 | Zare et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5903358 | Zare et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912740 | Zare et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6076392 | Drzewiecki | Jun 2000 | A |
6084682 | Zare et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6233052 | Zare et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6324191 | Horvath | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363772 | Berry | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6466322 | Paldus et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479019 | Goldstein et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504145 | Romanini et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6540691 | Phillips | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563583 | Ortyn et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582376 | Baghdassarian | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6633596 | Wulfmeyer | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658034 | Garnache et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6726637 | Phillips | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727492 | Ye et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6865198 | Taubman | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6952945 | O'Brien | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7004909 | Patel et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7012696 | Orr et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7101340 | Braun | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7106763 | Tan et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7235054 | Eckerbom | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7352463 | Bounaix | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7391517 | Trebbia et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7450240 | Morville et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7538881 | Ye et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7541586 | Miller | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555024 | Ishaaya et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569823 | Miller | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606274 | Mirov et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612885 | Cole et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7613216 | Nakagawa | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616123 | Ridder et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7646485 | Tan | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7679750 | Li et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7902534 | Cole et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8018981 | Eckles et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8109128 | Kalkman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8288727 | Cormier et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8322190 | Kalkman et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8437000 | Cole et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8488639 | Diels | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8564785 | Newbury et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8659758 | Koulikov et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659759 | Koulikov et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665442 | Koulikov et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8885167 | Koulikov et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8958446 | Hirose | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8982352 | Hoffnagle et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9014221 | Kub et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9029819 | Zhu et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9097583 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9194742 | Kachanov et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9207121 | Adler | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9212990 | Muraviev | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9568465 | Rihani et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9625702 | Hodges et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9653877 | Arissian et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9671332 | Christensen | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9755399 | Tulip | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9768347 | Teo | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9778110 | Rella et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9918661 | Cormier et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10034621 | Wondka et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10101268 | Apolonskiy et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10130284 | Johnson | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10139392 | Kaariainen et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10141713 | Kim et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10168275 | Orcutt | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10194833 | Cormier | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10234381 | Koulikov | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10330592 | Koulikov | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10401281 | Koulikov | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10499819 | Wondka et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10527492 | Bouzid | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10620048 | Allison | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20030109794 | Phillips | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030189711 | Orr et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040022281 | Steffens et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040137637 | Wang et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142484 | Berlin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162500 | Kline | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190563 | Gendron | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050134836 | Paldus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177056 | Giron et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177057 | Friedman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050201428 | Cotteverte | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213617 | Gendron | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050254535 | Loewen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060200037 | Falasco | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060233205 | Farmiga | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070008995 | Oozeki | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070062255 | Talton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091941 | Mori | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070133001 | Cox et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070268941 | Kim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080091085 | Urushihata et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080139021 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170597 | van der Veer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090201957 | Brotherton-Ratcliffe | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090232172 | Masuda | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090306527 | Kubo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002234 | Cormier et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100074089 | Smith | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100135342 | Livas | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110072887 | Oki | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110216311 | Kachanov et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110269632 | Haick | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295140 | Zaidi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120143805 | Gold et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120250706 | Stiens | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120266883 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120309048 | Ratcliffe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130144561 | Harb et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130228688 | Plusquellie et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130303929 | Martino et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140125993 | Kachanov et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140293283 | Farooq et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320856 | McKeever et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150032019 | Acker et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150077747 | Smith et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150138558 | Kachanov et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150335267 | Cormier et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160069795 | Koulikov | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160174875 | Forster et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160285236 | Yvind | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160313233 | Zangmeister et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170074857 | Dennis et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170373462 | Guzman | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180059003 | Jourdainne | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180156718 | Fleisher et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180202918 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180202923 | Kageyama et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212396 | Kim | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180214050 | Purves | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180261974 | Purves et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180350304 | Ishii | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190265159 | Koulikov | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190265160 | Koulikov | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190271641 | Koulikov | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190301933 | Allison | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190323955 | Koulikov | Oct 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2792032 | Sep 2011 | CA |
2997070 | Sep 2019 | CA |
101470072 | Jul 2009 | CN |
102316801 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102798631 | Nov 2012 | CN |
102841082 | Dec 2012 | CN |
102264292 | May 2014 | CN |
106908389 | Jun 2017 | CN |
106981552 | Jul 2017 | CN |
107037003 | Aug 2017 | CN |
109856054 | Jun 2019 | CN |
2130331 | Mar 1977 | DE |
2723939 | Dec 1978 | DE |
3819687 | Dec 1989 | DE |
3819687 | Dec 1989 | DE |
10156149 | Jun 2003 | DE |
557658 | Sep 1993 | EP |
600711 | Jun 1994 | EP |
1535047 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1304955 | Dec 2008 | EP |
1997198 | Jun 2012 | EP |
1418842 | Jul 2012 | EP |
3037805 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2745097 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3419122 | Dec 2018 | EP |
3467473 | Apr 2019 | EP |
1019295 | Feb 1966 | GB |
1019295 | Feb 1966 | GB |
2001194299 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2006189392 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006226727 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2010243270 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2013011620 | Jan 2013 | JP |
5341519 | Nov 2013 | JP |
5537174 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2016503904 | Feb 2016 | JP |
2090935 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2005038436 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005076875 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2005088274 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2017142644 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2011117572 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2012004794 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2014070952 | May 2014 | WO |
2018142027 | Aug 2018 | WO |
2019239827 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Orr et al. “Cavity ringdown spectroscopy with widely tunable swept-frequency lasers,” European Quantum Eletronics Conference, 2005 *EQEC '05) Jun. 12-17, 2005, p. 204. |
ISR for PCT/CA2007/002306 dated Apr. 17, 2008. |
Office action for CA2671122 dated Jun. 13, 2011. |
Harren et al., Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in Trace Gas Monitoring, encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, pp. 2203-2226, J. Wiley and Sons, 2000. |
Freed, C., Status of CO2 Isotope Lasers and Their Applications in Turnable Laser Spectroscopy, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. QE-18, No. 8, 1982. |
Sharpe et al., “Gas Phase Databases for Quantitative Infrared Spectroscopy,” Applied Spectroscopy, vol. 58, No. 12, 2004. |
Akaike, H., “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6): 716-723, 1974. |
Cormier, John G., “Development of an Infrared Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy Experiment and Measurements of Water Vapor Continuum Absorption.,” Thesis, 2002. |
Kurochkin et al., “Three Mirror Cavity CO2 Lser for Inactivity Saturated-Absorption Spectroscopy.” Optical Spectroscopy, vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 265-267, Aug. 1988. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/517,036 dated Dec. 14, 2011. |
Fuchs, D., et al., “Decline of exhaled isoprene in lung cancer patients correlates with immune activation,” Journal of breath research 6.2 (2012): 027101+B8. |
Ligor, Magdalena, et al., “Determination of volatile organic compounds of exhaled breath of patients with lung cancer using solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry,” Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 47.5 (2009): 550-560. |
Vaughan, Christina, et al., “Automated determination of seven phenolic compounds in mainstream tobacco smoke,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research 10.7 (2008): 1261-1268. |
Cope, et al., “Effects of ventilation on the collection of exhaled breath in humans,” J. App l Physiol 96: 1371-1379: 2004. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/720,447 dated Apr. 6, 2017. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/720,447 dated Apr. 19, 2018. |
Final office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/720,447 dated Sep. 13, 2017. |
English translation of DE102013215640A1. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/720,456 dated Jun. 14, 2017. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,212 dated Jun. 27, 2019. |
Final Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,212 dated Oct. 3, 2019. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/920,212 dated Jan. 23, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2020/050252 dated May 12, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2020/050250 dated May 22, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2020/050/249 dated Apr. 29, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2020/050248 dated Jun. 11, 2020. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/917,225 dated Mar. 9, 2020. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/917,225 dated May 14, 2020. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/509,207 dated Oct. 7, 2020. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/564,662 dated Aug. 10, 2020. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/509,207 dated Aug. 18, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200212646 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62470544 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15920212 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16813073 | US |