Military communications typically require long distance, low latency, and high reliability links. There is interest in leveraging commercial off-the shelf (COTS) wireless technology to bolster military communication capabilities. However, COTS radios are typically designed for home, school, or office use, requiring that either the COTS radios be modified, or specific architectures be designed for particular military applications.
It is important to test a chosen radio or communication architecture for functionality within its intended operational environment. For proof-of-concept and prototyping, purely software-based simulation can be helpful. However, drawbacks to the software-only approach to simulation include high costs, limited hardware-in-the-loop options, and steep learning curves for use of the software. On the other hand, solely using hardware in a near-operational environment is prohibitively expensive for proof-of-concept and development testing.
A need exists for a system that lies within the middle ground between software-only simulation and operational environment hardware testing.
At least two of second RF lens array ports 32 are connected to at least two of first RF lens array ports 22 by phase-matched connectors 40. As an example, phase-matched connectors 40 may be nested cosine wires. In other embodiments, phase-matched connectors 40 may be discrete coaxial cables or waveguides designed and tested to provide the same total phase shift. Such a configuration of RF lenses 20 and 30 may be referred to as a “back-to-back” configuration. By connecting RF lenses 20 and 30 in a back-to-back configuration, one-dimensional transmit and receive beam steering can be simulated. RF lenses 20 and 30 can each independently generate a phase slope φn that, if feeding a linear array antenna, would create a beam at some angle, θs, where:
where λ is the wavelength, n is the number of elements, and Δx is the inter-element spacing. By reciprocity, the same beam impinging upon a linear array antenna would generate a phase slope of φn. By connecting first RF lens 20 and second RF lens 30 together with phase-matched connectors 40, free space propagation between the lenses can be avoided.
System 10 may further include one or more phase-shifter 50 connected between at least one first RF lens array port 22 and at least one second RF lens array port 32. Phase-shifter 50 may be configured to more finely steer the beam in the case of using discretely-steerable RF lenses or to introduce further beam shaping regardless of the type of RF lenses used. An example of further beam shaping may be null-steering.
System 10 may also include a first RF switch 60, environment controller 70, RF transmitter 80, long-distance simulator 90, second RF switch 100, receiver controller 110, and RF receiver 120. First RF switch 60 may be connected to at least two beam ports 24 of first RF lens 20. As an example, first RF switch 60 may be a single pole, double throw GaAs RF switch, such as switch HMC270MS8G manufactured by the Hittite Microwave Corporation.
Environment controller 70 is connected to the control line(s) of first RF switch 60, RF transmitter 80, and long-distance simulator 90. Environment controller 70 may comprise a general purpose computing device having software installed therein that controls the throw selection of first RF switch 60 and the distance selection of the long-distance simulator 90. The environment controller may steer one RF lens to simulate changing the position of the remote node or a rotation of the local node. Then, the system under test (SUT, for example, the receiver controller 110) sweeps across the beams on its RF lens to choose the best pointing direction.
An example of an RF transmitter 80 is an HP 8673D Synthesized Signal Generator manufactured by the Agilent Corporation. Another example is the voltage controlled oscillator HMC431LP4 manufactured by the Hittite Microwave Corporation.
Long-distance simulator 90 is connected to environment controller 70, RF transmitter 80, and first RF switch 60. Long-distance simulator 90 is discussed in more detail with reference to
Second RF switch 100 may be connected to at least two beam ports 34 of second RF lens 30. Second RF switch 100 may be configured the same as or similar to first RF switch 60. Receiver controller 110 is connected to the control line(s) of second RF switch 100 and to RF receiver 120. RF receiver 120 is connected to receiver controller 110 and to the common/pole port of second RF switch 100. An example of an RF receiver 120 suitable for use within system 10 is the HP 8566B Spectrum Analyzer manufactured by the Agilent Corporation. Alternatively, wireless radios or other transceivers can be used in place of RF receiver 120 and RF transmitter 80. An example of a wireless radio suitable for use in place of RF receiver 120 and RF transmitter 80 is the Xtreme Range 5 radio manufactured by the Ubiquiti Networks Corporation.
The configuration of system 200 is the reciprocal of system 10 and may be used, as an example, to simulate and test transmit-only systems that need to find or track their target spatially and over long distances. The feedback of receiver information such as bit error rate, signal strength, or average RF power, may be fed to transmit controller 270 via an out-of-band feedback line 320. Feedback line 320 may simulate out-of-band feedback to transmitter 260, visual verification of target acquisition, or similar feedback mechanisms that are not sent on the same directional, long-distance wireless channel being simulated.
System 400 may be incorporated into either system 10 or 200 as described herein. As an example, if system 400 is incorporated into system 10, system 400 would replace long-distance simulator 90. In such a scenario, third RF switch 410 may be connected to first RF switch 60 and fourth RF switch 450 may be connected to RF transmitter 80. Further, the control line(s) of both third RF switch 410 and fourth RF switch 450 may be connected to environment controller 70. As another example, if system 400 is incorporated into system 200, system 400 would replace long-distance simulator 310. In such a scenario, third RF switch 410 may be connected to second RF switch 280 and fourth RF switch 450 may be connected to RF receiver 300. Further, the control line(s) of both third RF switch 410 and fourth RF switch 450 may be connected to environment controller 290.
In operation, a signal entering third RF switch 410 may be routed through a first path comprising RF optical modulator 420, fiber-optic cable 430, RF-optical demodulator 440, and fourth RF switch 450. Alternatively, a signal entering third RF switch 410 may be routed through a second path comprising RF optical modulator 460, fiber-optic cable 470, RF-optical demodulator 480, and fourth RF switch 450. The signal may be routed through the first path or second path depending upon the distance or propagation delay desired and chosen by the environment controller. Switch 450 outputs the signal to either RF transmitter 80 or RF receiver 300, depending upon the system configuration.
System 500 may be incorporated into either system 10 or 200 as described herein. As an example, if system 500 is incorporated into system 10, system 500 would replace long-distance simulator 90. In such a scenario, RF optical demodulator 560 may be connected to RF transmitter 80 and RF optical modulator 510 may be connected to first RF switch 60. Further, the control line(s) of both first optical switch 520 and second optical switch 540 may be connected to environment controller 70. As another example, if system 500 is incorporated into system 200, system 500 would replace long-distance simulator 310. In such a scenario, RF optical modulator 510 may be connected to second RF switch 280 and RF optical demodulator 560 may be connected to RF receiver 300. Further, the control lines of both first optical switch 520 and second optical switch 540 may be connected to environment controller 290.
In operation, a signal entering RF optical modulator 510 may be output to first optical switch 520. The signal may then be either routed through fiber optic cable 530 or fiber optic cable 550, from either of which the signal is output to second optical switch 540. Second optical switch 540 outputs the signal to RF optical demodulator 560, which outputs the signal to either RF transmitter 80 or RF receiver 300, depending upon the system configuration.
Second RF lens pair 650 may include a first RF lens 660 having at least two first RF lens array ports 662 and at least one first RF lens beam port 664, and a second RF lens 670 having at least two second RF lens array ports 672 and at least one second RF lens beam port 674. At least two of second RF lens array ports 672 are connected to at least two of the first RF lens array ports 662 by phase-matched connectors 680. In some embodiments, phase-matched connectors 680 are nested cosine wires. Second RF lens pair 650 may be connected to a second branch of power divider/combiner 700 via, as an example, first RF lens beam port 664.
System 600 may further comprise an RF transmitter 710 connected to the common port of power divider/combiner 700, as well as an environment controller 720 connected to RF transmitter 710. RF transmitter 710 may be configured similarly to RF transmitter 80 of
System 600 may further include a first RF receiver 730 connected to second RF lens beam port 634, as well as a first receiver controller 740 connected to first RF receiver 730. System 600 may also include a second RF receiver 750 connected to second RF lens beam port 674, as well as a second receiver controller 760 connected to second RF receiver 750. First RF receiver 730 and second RF receiver 750 may be configured similarly to RF receiver 120 of
The configuration of system 600 enables the physical simulation of directional wireless systems operating over wider spatial angles than are possible through use of a single back-to-back RF lens pair. RF lenses are typically limited to at most +/−60° scanning. Use of multiple back-to-back RF lens pairs in system 600 allows each lens pair to cover different sectors of the total angular space. Steering continuity between sectors is simulated by having the same signals through each lens pair, through use of power divider/combiner 700, and affecting the attenuation of one branch relative to the other through use of variable attenuator 690. An example use would be to test handover between sectors of a cellular base station.
Second RF lens pair 850 may include a first RF lens 860 having at least two first RF lens array ports 862 and at least one first RF lens beam port 864, and a second RF lens 870 having at least two second RF lens array ports 872 and at least one second RF lens beam port 874. At least two of second RF lens array ports 872 are connected to at least two of the first RF lens array ports 862 by phase-matched connectors 880. In some embodiments, phase-matched connectors 880 are nested cosine wires. Second RF lens pair 850 may be connected to a second branch of power divider/combiner 900 via, as an example, first RF lens beam port 864.
System 800 may further comprise an RF receiver 910 connected to the common port of power divider/combiner 900, as well as an environment controller 920 connected to RF receiver 910. RF receiver 910 may be configured similarly to RF receiver 300 of
System 800 may further include a first RF transmitter 930 connected to second RF lens beam port 834, as well as a first transmitter controller 940 connected to first RF transmitter 930. System 800 may also include a second RF transmitter 950 connected to second RF lens beam port 874, as well as a second transmitter controller 960 connected to second RF transmitter 950. First RF transmitter 930 and second RF transmitter 950 may be configured similarly to RF transmitter 260 of
The feedback of receiver information such as bit error rate, signal strength, or average RF power, may be fed to first transmit controller 940 via an out-of-band feedback line 970, and to second transmitter controller 960 via out-of-band feedback line 980. Feedback lines 970 and 980 may simulate out-of-band feedback to first transmitter 930 and second transmitter 950, respectively, visual verification of target acquisition, or similar feedback mechanisms that are not sent on the same directional, long-distance wireless channel being simulated. Feedback lines 970 and 980 may be configured similarly to feedback line 320 of system 200.
Many modifications and variations of the System for Physical Simulation of Long-Distance and Directional Wireless Channels are possible in light of the above description. Within the scope of the appended claims, the System for Physical Simulation of Long-Distance and Directional Wireless Channels may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. Further, the scope of the claims is not limited to the implementations and embodiments disclosed herein, but extends to other implementations and embodiments as may be contemplated by those having ordinary skill in the art.
The System for Physical Simulation of Long-Distance and Directional Wireless Channels is assigned to the United States Government and is available for licensing for commercial purposes. Licensing and technical inquiries may be directed to the Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific, Code 2112, San Diego, Calif., 92152; voice (619) 553-2778; email T2@spawar.navy.mil. Reference Navy Case No. 99574.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3761936 | Archer et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
4121221 | Meadows | Oct 1978 | A |
4176322 | Kommrusch | Nov 1979 | A |
4348678 | Thomas | Sep 1982 | A |
4490723 | Hardie et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4558324 | Clapp | Dec 1985 | A |
4845507 | Archer et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
7075893 | Mlinarsky et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7136587 | Davis et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |