The present invention relates to a system for piloting an aircraft, at least for piloting the aircraft during an autonomous approach for the purpose of landing, in particular in the military sector.
An autonomous approach must make it possible to fly the aircraft under instrument-based meteorological flight conditions of IMC (“Instrument Meteorological Conditions”) type, up to a decision height, for example 200 feet (about 60 meters), which corresponds to the decision height for a precision approach of ILS (“Instrument Landing System”) type, without using navigation means situated on the ground. During an autonomous approach such as this, the positioning means used by the aircraft are therefore exclusively onboard means, and in particular a satellite-based positioning system, for example of GPS (“Global Positioning System”) type, an inertial platform, and barometric sensors. The approach can also be carried out without an air space controller. At said decision height, the crew of the aircraft must visually acquire the runway. If such is the case, they finish the landing in visual mode with the aid of manual guidance. On the other hand, if at this decision height, the crew do not see the runway, they must perform a go-around so as to make the aircraft climb back up to a predetermined safety altitude. The approach trajectory used to carry out an autonomous approach such as this is created before the flight and described on a paper chart which is at the disposal of the crew in the course of the flight. Accordingly, the configuration of the terrain around the landing runway has been analyzed and margins in relation to obstacles have been defined. This approach trajectory is also saved in a database of the aircraft piloting system.
Document FR-2 852 686 discloses a system for piloting an aircraft intended to pilot the aircraft during a non-precision approach. This piloting system is used especially in the civil sector. A standard piloting system such as this, which therefore relates to a non-precision approach, presents a major objective common to an autonomous approach such as considered in the present invention, namely that said piloting system must be autonomous in relation to the navigation means situated on the ground and must thus be able to carry out the approach at any location on the terrestrial globe.
A standard piloting system such as this, intended for a non-precision approach, generally comprises:
It will be noted however that the objectives of an autonomous approach, in particular in the military sector, are more ambitious than those of a non-precision approach of aforesaid type in the civil sector. In particular, the decision heights envisaged are a minimum of 200 feet (about 60 meters) for an autonomous approach, while they are a minimum of 250 feet (about 75 meters) for a non-precision approach. Consequently, the safety cone in which the aircraft must remain in order to perform the approach is smaller in an autonomous approach than in a non-precision approach. Moreover, in an autonomous approach, the absence of any air traffic controller removes a surveillance means, as compared with the situation existing for a non-precision approach in the civil sector.
Thus, the standard piloting system of aforesaid type, which is very appropriate for piloting an aircraft during a non-precision approach, makes it possible to guarantee:
The object of the present invention is to remedy these drawbacks. It relates to a piloting system making it possible to implement an autonomous approach of aforesaid type, guaranteeing at one and the same time the upkeep of the performance demanded and compliance with the critical nature of certain parameters used.
For this purpose, according to the invention, said piloting system of the type comprising at least:
Thus, by virtue of the invention, the piloting system does not comprise any multi-mode landing aid receiver in contradistinction to an aforesaid standard piloting system, and the flight guidance computer directly calculates, with the aid of the position indication and of the information characterizing the virtual approach axis, the linear deviations which are used to calculate the piloting setpoints. This avoids carrying out conversions of angular deviations into linear deviations, such as carried out in the aforesaid standard piloting system. The piloting system in accordance with the invention also makes it possible to increase the flexibility of a piloting aid means, in particular an automatic pilot, used.
Moreover, the fact of carrying out the calculation of the linear deviations and the calculation of the setpoints of the guidance in one and the same flight guidance computer makes it possible to decrease the latency times.
Consequently, by virtue of the piloting system in accordance with the invention, the guidance is optimized so as to be able to fly with the same guidance laws for small slopes and for large slopes and to be able to capture relatively short approach axes.
Furthermore, as the piloting system in accordance with the invention does not comprise any multi-mode landing aid receiver (in contradistinction to the aforesaid standard piloting system), it exhibits a simplified architecture.
Furthermore, advantageously, said information sources comprise:
In a particular embodiment, the piloting system in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, at least one piloting aid means, for example an automatic pilot or a flight director, which is connected to said flight guidance computer and which uses said guidance setpoints to aid in guiding the aircraft.
Furthermore, said piloting system comprises, moreover, auxiliary means which are connected to said flight guidance computer and which use said lateral and vertical angular deviations, namely in particular a control and display system of CDS (“Control and Display System”) type which displays the angular deviations on at least one screen of the flight deck or a flight surveillance system of FWS (“Flight Warning System”) type which uses said angular deviations to carry out surveillance.
The single FIGURE of the appended drawing will clearly elucidate the manner in which the invention may be carried out. This single FIGURE is the schematic diagram of a piloting system in accordance with the invention.
The system 1 in accordance with the invention and schematically represented in the FIGURE, is intended for piloting an aircraft, in particular a military transport airplane. More particularly, its aim is at least to pilot the aircraft during an autonomous approach (that is to say in the absence of information making it possible to implement a standard instrument precision approach) for the purpose of landing on a landing runway (not represented).
Said piloting system 1 which is onboard said aircraft (not represented), is of the type comprising:
In a particular embodiment, said information sources 2 comprise:
According to the invention, said processing means 3 form part of a flight guidance computer 10 of FG (“flight guidance”) type, which comprises:
Said means 16 use the piloting setpoints received from said flight guidance computer 10 to allow the guidance of the aircraft up to the landing thereof, either directly (said means 16 can comprise for this purpose a standard automatic pilot 17) or indirectly (said means 16 can then comprise a standard flight director 18, to present the piloting setpoints to the pilot who in this case carries out the guidance manually).
In contradistinction to a standard piloting system making it possible to pilot the aircraft during a non-precision approach, the vertical and lateral angular deviations which are calculated in a standard manner by the calculation means 12 are not used to determine the linear deviations (which are calculated directly by the calculation means 11 within the framework of the present invention). However, these lateral and vertical angular deviations can be transmitted, by way of a link 19, to user devices, and in particular:
Thus, when during a flight of the aircraft the pilot desires to carry out an autonomous approach (following a virtual approach axis) for the purpose of landing on a runway, he selects this approach mode with the aid of a man/machine interface provided in a standard manner on the flight management system 4. Said flight system 4 then extracts the information making it possible to characterize the virtual approach axis from the database 6 which is an aircraft navigation database. This information is transmitted in real time to the flight guidance computer 10. The positioning system 8 also provides said flight guidance computer 10, in real time, with the current actual three-dimensional position of the aircraft, which comprises the position in two dimensions (latitude, longitude) in the horizontal plane as well as the geometric altitude. With the aid of said approach axis and of said three-dimensional position, the flight guidance computer 10 calculates at one and the same time:
The specific feature of the architecture of the piloting system 1 in accordance with the invention (used for an autonomous approach) is the fact that the linear deviations are calculated directly in the flight guidance computer 10, thereby making it possible to optimize the guidance chain.
In a particular embodiment, said positioning system 8 comprises, to determine the current actual position in 3D of the aircraft;
A GPS system (“Global Positioning System”) of military type is preferably used as satellite-based positioning device. However, it is also conceivable to use a global satellite navigation system of GNSS (“Global Navigation Satellite System”) type, an augmentation system based on satellites of SBAS (“Satellite Based Augmentation System”) type or a satellite-based positioning system of GALILEO type.
In a particular embodiment, said positioning system 8 and said flight guidance computer 10 are each embodied on the basis of three elements, namely three positioning units and three computers. In this case, each of the three positioning units calculates a position in two dimensions and a hybrid altitude that it dispatches to the three computers. Each computer consolidates a position in two dimensions and an altitude on the basis of the three data items received. The positioning system 8 determines, as a function of technical considerations such as the constellation of the satellites, a precision and an integrity level for the calculated positions. If these parameters are below the performance required for an autonomous approach, the positioning system 8 dispatches a message to the flight management computer 4 which declares the autonomous approach unavailable to the crew, for example by way of a display in particular on a screen of the display and control system 20. The previous characteristics make it possible to secure the use of the three-dimensional position of the aircraft in the guidance. Moreover, the direct use of this three-dimensional position by the flight guidance computer 10 makes it possible to optimize the latency time and therefore the precision of the comparison, in particular with respect to a standard architecture for which the position is hybridized in a flight management system before being used by a multi-mode landing aid receiver.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 00247 | Jan 2006 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2007/000037 | 1/10/2007 | WO | 00 | 5/28/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/080314 | 7/19/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3696671 | Steigleder et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
4385354 | Hornfeld et al. | May 1983 | A |
5136297 | Lux et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5654890 | Nicosia et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
6040798 | Kinal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6178363 | McIntyre et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6342853 | Kalafus | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6570531 | Stratton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6629023 | Silder et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6711479 | Staggs | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6845304 | Young | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7084785 | Rouquette et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7286077 | Falcati et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7715955 | Tatham et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20010020214 | Brenner | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020004692 | Nicosia et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030135327 | Levine et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040199304 | Tatham et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220733 | Pasturel et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060097895 | Reynolds et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132358 | Holderle et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070106433 | He | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 852 686 | Sep 2004 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Aug. 17, 2007 w/ English translation. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority w/ English translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080319591 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |