A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The invention is generally related to wind turbines and other mechanical turbines and motors, and is particularly related to a system for providing dynamic pitch control in a wind turbine.
Wind power is the conversion of wind energy into a useful form of energy, such as electricity, using a wind turbine. Large wind turbines, and groups of turbines referred to as wind farms, can be connected to the electrical grid, and their power output used to power whole communities. Smaller, individual wind turbines can be used to provide power to isolated locations, such as single household or farm. Wind energy is a plentiful, renewable, and clean energy source, and is an important step in eliminating dependence on fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and providing an alternative and environmentally friendly energy source. Technologies that allow wind turbines to make more optimal use of available winds are of great interest in promoting the advance of wind power. This is the general area that embodiments of the invention are intended to address.
Described herein is a system for providing dynamic pitch control in a wind turbine. In accordance with an embodiment, the dynamic pitch control uses a starting spring to pitch the blades of the wind turbine into a starting position that is suited for very low wind speeds. The pitch control then automatically pitches the blades into a run position as the wind speed increases, using a combination of a rotational mass and a restraining spring. This allows the turbine to be started, and to generate power, at a much lower starting wind speed than the turbine's operating wind speed, yet still operate at optimal speeds in its typical running range. In accordance with an embodiment, as the wind speed further increases beyond an overspeed limit, the rotational mass overcomes its restraining spring, and automatically pitches the blades back toward and beyond their start position, thereby limiting rotation speed and power reducing the likelihood of damage to the turbine caused by high speeds.
Described herein is a system for providing dynamic pitch control in a wind turbine. As described above, wind energy is a plentiful, renewable, and clean energy source, and is an important step in eliminating dependence on fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and providing an alternative and environmentally friendly energy source. Wind turbines are generally designed to produce electrical energy efficiently, which usually requires the turbines to operate in the most typical and commonly experienced conditions. However, available wind speed is itself a variable quantity, and even for a particular location can vary substantially from day-to-day, and even at different times of the day. Wind turbines are generally designed so that they yield maximum power output at average wind speeds, for example 30 knots. It rarely pays to design the turbine to increase output at stronger winds, since stronger winds are comparatively rarer than weak winds. Even if the power output could be increased, the mechanical forces on the turbine at high rotation can make it unstable and prone to damage if it does not limit power and rotation speed in very high wind speeds. For this reason, many wind turbines include some form of power control that controls or governs the maximum rotation of the turbine blades at high wind speeds, and correspondingly governs the maximum power output of the turbine.
Two of the more common ways to govern a wind turbine are pitch control and stall control. Both of these techniques can be designed to be passive, in which case the operation of the wind against the turbine itself initiates the control; or active, in which case a computer or other controller monitors wind or turbine speed and initiates the control. Stall-controlled wind turbines are not described in detail herein. In an active pitch controlled wind turbine, the turbine's controller monitors the maximum rotation of the blades, or the power output of the turbine. When the speed or power output becomes too high, it adjusts the blade pitch mechanism, which immediately pitches (turns) the rotor blades slightly out of the wind, and causes the turbine rotation speed to be reduced. The blades can then be turned back into the wind whenever the wind drops again, which causes the turbine rotation speed to be increased. To pitch, each rotor blade has to be able to turn around their longitudinal axis. In a passive pitch control system, the control is performed by the forces generated by the moving turbine itself, rather than an externally-triggered force. When the blades rotate increasingly faster at higher wind speeds, the pitch mechanism generates a correspondingly higher centripetal force. This centripetal force can be used to mechanically pitch the blades, and to control or govern the turbine's speed.
As described above, one of the advantages of passive pitch control is that it can be used to slow the blade rotation, and reduce the likelihood of damage to the turbine at high speeds. However, the commonly available forms of pitch control have no effect whatsoever at low rotation speeds. Furthermore, as described above, most wind turbines are generally designed so that they yield maximum power output at average wind speeds. This generally requires that the starting pitch of the turbine blades are usually in the optimal run position. A problem with this approach is that each wind turbine differs in their starting wind speed versus their running speed range. While a wind turbine may be designed to run in a range of 5-30 knots, it may take an initial wind speed of 10 knots to start rotating that same turbine. If a working turbine drops below its operating speed (in this example, say below 5 knots), then it must wait idle for a higher wind speed (in this example, 10 knots), before it can be started again.
In accordance with an embodiment, a system for providing dynamic pitch control in a wind turbine is provided. In a traditional wind turbine, the starting pitch of the turbine blades are usually presented in their optimal run position, so that, once the wind turbine has been started, the wind turbine yields good power output at typical wind speeds. However, the starting wind speed that is needed to start the wind turbine is often higher than the lower limit of the turbine's operating wind speed. This represents a wind obstacle that must be overcome before any power is produced, and hinders overall turbine performance.
In accordance with an embodiment, a dynamic pitch control uses a starting spring to pitch the blades of the wind turbine into a starting position that is suited for very low wind speeds. The pitch control then automatically pitches the blades into a run position as the wind speed increases, using a combination of a rotational mass and a restraining spring. This allows the turbine to be started, and to generate power, at a much lower starting wind speed than the turbine's operating wind speed, yet still operate at optimal speeds in its typical running range. In accordance with an embodiment, as the wind speed further increases beyond an overspeed limit, the rotational mass overcomes its restraining spring, and automatically pitches the blades back toward and beyond their start position, reducing the likelihood of damage to the turbine caused by high speeds.
As described above, one of the advantages of pitch control is that it can be used to slow the blade rotation, and reduce the likelihood of damage to the turbine at high speeds. However, the forms of pitch control described above have no effect whatsoever at low rotation speeds. Furthermore, as described above, most wind turbines are generally designed so that they yield maximum power output at average wind speeds. This generally requires that the starting pitch of the turbine blades are usually in the optimal run position, or as described above, that the pitch control mechanism pitches the blades to stall or feather at overspeed, and then back to their optimal run position.
A retaining member 166 together with a stop 172 ensures that in a first position of the beam, only the start pitch spring has operable tension on the beam, with the stop preventing the retaining member and its limit pitch spring from having any considerable tension on the beam. The limit pitch spring is connected to the retaining member using a tension adjustment means 176, such as a threaded nut or bolt.
In usage, when the rotational speed 180 of the turbine is zero, or very low, the start pitch spring deforms the beam, pulling it closer to the shaft. This shortens the effective length of the beam and pulls the spider closer toward the support (i.e. away from the blades). Since the spider is coupled to the turbine blades, this movement can be used to control the pitch of the blades, and in particular to pitch the blades in the optimal position for a low wind speed start. When the rotational speed of the turbine increases, the center mass exerts a centripetal force on the beam, and the lateral or outward translation 184 of the mass negates the deformation on the beam. This lengthens the effective length of the beam, and causes a corresponding lateral translation 186 of the spider away from the support (i.e. toward the blades). Again, since the spider is coupled to the turbine blades, this can be used to control the pitch of the blades, and in particular to pitch the blades in this instance to the optimal position for normal running speed. The limit pitch spring and its tension adjustment can be adjusted to control the tension and to tune the degree to which the center mass has such an effect the blades. When the rotational speed of the turbine increases further to its maximum operating range, the center mass exerts a centripetal force on the beam that exceeds the pre-set tension of the limit pitch spring. Once again, this shortens the effective length of the beam and pulls the spider closer toward the support (i.e. away from the blades), which pitches the blades back to either their start position, or another stalled or feathered position, depowering the turbine. The process repeats with changes in wind condition, and corresponding changes in blade pitch to compensate.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In the description of the above embodiment, the dynamic pitch control is shown as being positioned generally downwind from the turbine blades, and having tension springs on one side of the beam. It will be evident that in accordance with other embodiments the dynamic pitch control can alternatively be positioned upwind from the turbine blades, i.e. in front of the blades. Similarly, it will be evident that in accordance with other embodiments, compression springs can be used on one or more sides of the beam, or a combination of tension springs and compression springs can be used. In accordance with other embodiments, the dynamic pitch control can also be duplicated within a single control mechanism, for example to provide greater control, and redundancy in case of failure.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. Particularly, it will be evident that different means of implementing or connecting and using the dynamic pitch control mechanism with the blades can be used. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalence.
This applicant claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/117,059, titled “SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING DYNAMIC PITCH CONTROL IN A WIND TURBINE”, filed Nov. 21, 2008; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/117,061, titled “VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE WITH VARIABLE AREA”, filed Nov. 21, 2008, each of which applications are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1482690 | Lanzius | Feb 1924 | A |
2086686 | Weible | Jul 1937 | A |
2383002 | Mader | Aug 1945 | A |
2533321 | King | Dec 1950 | A |
3976397 | Hunt | Aug 1976 | A |
4047832 | Sforza | Sep 1977 | A |
4050246 | Bourquardez | Sep 1977 | A |
4084921 | Norz | Apr 1978 | A |
4109885 | Pender | Aug 1978 | A |
4111594 | Sforza | Sep 1978 | A |
4257736 | Jacobs | Mar 1981 | A |
4355955 | Kisovec | Oct 1982 | A |
4435646 | Coleman et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4474531 | Weiss | Oct 1984 | A |
4478379 | Kerr | Oct 1984 | A |
4495423 | Rogers | Jan 1985 | A |
4582013 | Holland, Jr. | Apr 1986 | A |
4601444 | Lindenbaum | Jul 1986 | A |
4695012 | Lindenbaum | Sep 1987 | A |
4703189 | DiValentin et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4792281 | Coleman | Dec 1988 | A |
4795113 | Minovitch | Jan 1989 | A |
4807129 | Perks | Feb 1989 | A |
4947334 | Massey et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952120 | Aubry et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958289 | Sum et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4967550 | Acton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4993348 | Wald | Feb 1991 | A |
5005353 | Acton et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5011373 | Aubry et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5064143 | Bucher | Nov 1991 | A |
5082421 | Acton et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083039 | Richardson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086993 | Wainfan | Feb 1992 | A |
5140170 | Henderson | Aug 1992 | A |
5141391 | Acton et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5224665 | Goldsberry et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5225712 | Erdman | Jul 1993 | A |
5237618 | Bethel | Aug 1993 | A |
5474425 | Lawler | Dec 1995 | A |
5529263 | Rudolph | Jun 1996 | A |
5570859 | Quandt | Nov 1996 | A |
5709419 | Roskey | Jan 1998 | A |
5779169 | Sloan | Jul 1998 | A |
5798631 | Spee et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5823468 | Bothe | Oct 1998 | A |
5915649 | Head | Jun 1999 | A |
5973440 | Nitzsche et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975464 | Rutan | Nov 1999 | A |
RE36487 | Wainfan | Jan 2000 | E |
6072303 | Nickoladze et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6119979 | Lee et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129306 | Pham | Oct 2000 | A |
6137187 | Mikhail et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6231004 | Peebles | May 2001 | B1 |
6239506 | Roskey | May 2001 | B1 |
6320272 | Lading et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322324 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6365039 | Henkin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387250 | Henkin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390412 | Stevens | May 2002 | B1 |
6420795 | Mikhail et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425552 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6453669 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464459 | Illingworth | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6493689 | Kotoulas et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6575406 | Nelson | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581537 | McBride et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600240 | Mikhail et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607161 | Krysinski et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609889 | Vilsboll | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612522 | Aldrin et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616094 | Illingworth | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6619918 | Rebsdorf | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622973 | Al-Garni et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652221 | Praenkel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6670721 | Lof et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
RE38479 | Henkin et al. | Mar 2004 | E |
6751602 | Kotoulas et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6768277 | Ichinose et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769873 | Beauchamp et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6847128 | Mikhail et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853094 | Feddersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856039 | Mikhail et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856040 | Feddersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856041 | Siebenthaler et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863239 | Terpay | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6902370 | Dawson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911744 | Roskey | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913228 | Lee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921045 | Chang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921985 | Janssen et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6933625 | Feddersen et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938854 | Nelson | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6940185 | Andersen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949842 | Earley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966758 | Grabau et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7004724 | Pierce et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015595 | Feddersen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032860 | Kirk et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7042110 | Mikhail et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7095129 | Moroz | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7095131 | Mikhail et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118336 | Waddleton | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118338 | Moroz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121795 | Moroz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126236 | Harbourt et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164368 | Ireland | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7172392 | Wastling et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199486 | Roskey | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7245037 | Angquist et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7262395 | Bilyk et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267300 | Heath et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7281891 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7334755 | Svoboda, Jr. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7345373 | Delmerico et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351033 | McNerney | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7352076 | Gabrys | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7360996 | Driver | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7410123 | Nunnally | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7416155 | Cuccias et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7417333 | Miller et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7425771 | Rivas et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7445431 | Larsen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7470086 | Jennings et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7485018 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7525208 | Wobben | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7528496 | Fortmann | May 2009 | B2 |
7569944 | Oohara et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581926 | Dehlsen et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7582977 | Dehlsen | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7605488 | Rebsdorf | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7632068 | Bak et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648338 | Welsh | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7658346 | Goossen | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663262 | Roskey | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7686583 | Siegel | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692322 | Wakasa et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709972 | Arinaga et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717673 | Menke | May 2010 | B2 |
7719128 | Kammer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728452 | Arinaga et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740448 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758300 | Friesth | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761190 | Delmerico et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7785098 | Appleby et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7789624 | Appa et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802968 | Jacobsen | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7819019 | Bisgaard | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7834472 | Rebsdorf et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7851934 | Myborg | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7854589 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880321 | Arinaga et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7884492 | Xiong et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7884562 | Klatt | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7891944 | Jeppesen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893413 | Appleby et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7896614 | Fisher | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7902487 | Mistry et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7902689 | Kinzie et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020105189 | Mikhail et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030230898 | Jamieson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040094964 | Mikhail et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040207208 | Mikhail et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050062291 | Earley | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050253396 | Mikhail et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002794 | Moroz et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070057517 | McNerney | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080206051 | Wakasa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090321555 | Nitzsche et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100129215 | Preus | May 2010 | A1 |
20100143129 | Fisher | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100187820 | Wakasa et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110018280 | Mahaffy et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59134385 | Aug 1984 | JP |
04194368 | Jul 1992 | JP |
2005061320 | Mar 2005 | JP |
1020070054331 | May 2007 | KR |
8404362 | Nov 1984 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report re: Application No. PCT/US2009/065396 dated Sep. 7, 2010, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100129215 A1 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61117059 | Nov 2008 | US | |
61117061 | Nov 2008 | US |