The present invention relates to a system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting. The present invention relates more particularly to system for reading and authenticating a sheeting including a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting. The present invention also relates more particularly to methods of reading and authenticating a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting.
As tampering and counterfeiting of identification documents, such as passports, driver's licenses, identification cards and badges, and documents of value, such as bonds, certificates, and negotiable instruments, increase, there is a need for greater security features and measures. Using commonly available technology, it is possible to alter such typed, printed, photographed or handwritten details in such a way that the document can then show that the ownership of that document, or an article to which that document relates, has been transferred to a party not legally entitled to that document or article. To impede the successful tampering or alteration of such details, it is a known practice to apply a security laminate over the top of such details. Such laminates may contain security features that will indicate whether the laminate itself is genuine, whether the laminate has been lifted or replaced, whether the laminate's surface has been penetrated, and whether that laminate surface has been overprinted or overlabelled. Other security features can include printing or patterns that respond to ultra-violet or infra-red light.
One example of a commercially available security laminate is the 3M™ Confirm™ Security Laminate with Floating Images, which is sold by 3M Company based in St. Paul, Minn. This security laminate with floating image is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,842 B1, “Sheeting with Composite Image that Floats,” (Florczak et al.), which is owned by the same assignee as the present application. This patent discloses microlens sheetings with composite images in which the composite image floats above or below the sheeting, or both. The composite image may be two-dimensional or three-dimensional. Methods for providing such an imaged sheeting, including by the application of radiation to a radiation sensitive material layer adjacent the microlens, are also disclosed in this patent.
A variety of security readers are known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,842, “Security Reader for Automatic Detection of Tampering and Alteration, (Mann) discloses a security reader for reading and processing information about security laminates. One example of a passport reader is commercially available from 3M Company based in St. Paul, Minn. and 3M AiT, Ltd. based in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, as the 3M™ Full Page Reader (formerly sold as the AiT™ imPAX™ Reader).
A variety of machine vision systems are known in the art. For example, Computer Vision written by Dana Bollard and Christopher Brown is a text book concerning computer vision or machine vision. Computer Vision discloses that computer vision or machine vision is the enterprise of automating and integrating a wide range of processes and representations used for vision perception. It includes as parts many techniques that are useful by themselves, such as image processing (transforming, encoding, and transmitting images) and statistical pattern classification (statistical decision theory applied to general patterns, visual or otherwise), geometric modeling, and cognitive processing. In essence, machine vision is taking a two-dimensional representation of a three-dimensional scene and trying to replicate the three-dimensional scene. However, machine vision systems are not used for verifying the existence of a perceived three-dimensional security feature and then authenticating such security feature by comparing it to a database of security features.
Although the commercial success of available security features and security readers has been impressive, as the capabilities of counterfeiters continues to evolve, it is desirable to further improve the ability to indicate that a security feature has been tampered with or somehow compromised to help protect against counterfeiting, alteration, duplication, and simulation.
One aspect of the present invention provides a system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting. The system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting comprises: a sheeting including a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting or both; a reader, comprising: a first camera to capture a first image of the sheeting and a first image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both; a second camera to capture a second image of the sheeting and a second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both; and a computer for comparing the first image and the second image of the sheeting and for comparing the first image and second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both to calculate the perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both.
In one preferred embodiment of the above system, the system further comprises a database including information about composite images that float above or below the sheeting or both and their floating distances relative to the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the computer compares the first image of the composite image that floats above or below the sheeting or both to the database of composite images to identify the composite image. In another aspect of this embodiment, the system compares the calculated perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image with the floating distances in the database to provide information about the sheeting. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the calculated perceived distance matches the floating distance in the database for the identified composite image and the system thereby authenticates the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the calculated perceived distance does not match the floating distances in the database for the identified composite image and the system thereby determines that the sheeting is not authentic.
In one preferred embodiment of the above system, the first camera and second camera are perpendicular to the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the sheeting is located in a fixed position. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float above the sheeting. In yet another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float above the sheeting.
In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float below the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float below the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image also appears to the unaided eye to be at least in part in the plane of the sheeting.
Another aspect of the present invention provides an alternative system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting. The system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting comprises: a sheeting including a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting or both; a reader, comprising: a camera moveable between a first position and a second position, wherein in the first position the camera captures a first image of the sheeting and a first image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both, wherein in the second position the camera captures a second image of the sheeting and captures a second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both; and a computer for comparing the first image and the second image of the sheeting and for comparing the first image and second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both to calculate the perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both.
In one preferred embodiment of the above system, the system further comprises a database including information about composite images that float above or below the sheeting or both and their floating distances relative to the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the computer compares the first image of the composite image that floats above or below the sheeting or both to the database of composite images to identify the composite image. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the system compares the calculated perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image with the floating distances in the database to provide information about the sheeting.
In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the calculated perceived distance of the floating image, above or below the sheeting or both, matches the floating distance in the database for the identified composite image and the system thereby authenticates the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the calculated perceived distance does not match the floating distances in the database for the identified composite image and the system thereby determines that the sheeting is not authentic. In yet another preferred embodiment of the above system, the sheeting is located in a fixed position.
In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float above the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float above the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float below the sheeting. In yet another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float below the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the composite image also appears to the unaided eye to be at least in part in the plane of the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the camera is perpendicular to the sheeting.
Another aspect of the present invention provides an alternative system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting. The system for reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting comprises: a sheeting including a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting; a reader, comprising: a camera; and a sheeting holder moveable between a first position and a second position, wherein the microlens sheeting is positioned on the sheeting holder, wherein in the first position the camera captures a first image of the sheeting and a first image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both, wherein in the second position the camera captures a second image of the microlens sheeting and a second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both; and a computer for comparing the first image and the second image of the sheeting and for comparing the first image and second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both to calculate the perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both.
In one preferred embodiment of the above system, the system further comprises a database including information about composite images that float above or below the sheeting or both and their floating distances relative to the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the computer compares the first image of the composite image that floats above or below the sheeting or both to the database of composite images to identify the composite image. In another aspect of this embodiment, the system compares the calculated perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image with the floating distances in the database to provide information about the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the calculated perceived distance matches the floating distance in the database for the identified composite image and the system thereby authenticates the sheeting. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the calculated distance does not match the floating distances in the database for the identified composite image and the system thereby determines that the sheeting is not authentic.
In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the first camera and second camera are perpendicular to the sheeting. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the sheeting is located in a fixed position. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float above the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float above the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float below the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float below the sheeting. In yet another aspect of this embodiment, the composite image also appears to the unaided eye to be at least in part in the plane of the sheeting.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of reading and authenticating a composite image in a sheeting. The method comprises the steps of: providing a sheeting including a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting or both; recording a first image of the microlens sheeting and recording a first image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both; recording a second image of the microlens sheeting and recording a second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both; calculating the perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both by comparing the first image and the second image of the microlens sheeting and by comparing the first image and second image of the composite image floating above or below the sheeting or both.
In one preferred embodiment of the above method, the method further includes the step of: providing a database including information about composite images that float above or below the sheeting or both and their floating distances relative to the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the method further includes the step of: identifying the composite image by comparing the first image of the composite image that floats above or below the sheeting or both to the database of composite images. In another aspect of this embodiment, the method further includes the step of: comparing the calculated perceived distance between the sheeting and the composite image with the floating distances in the database to provide information about the sheeting. In another aspect of this embodiment, the method further includes the step of: providing a signal to a user that the sheeting is authentic when the calculated perceived distance matches the floating distance in the database for the identified composite image and the system. In another aspect of this embodiment, the method further includes the step of: providing a signal to a user that the sheeting is not authentic when the calculated perceived distance does not match the floating distances in the database for the identified composite image.
In one preferred embodiment of the above method, the composite image appears under reflected light to float above the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float above the sheeting. In another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image appears under reflected light to float below the sheeting. In one preferred embodiment of the above method, the composite image appears in transmitted light to float below the sheeting. In yet another preferred embodiment of the above system, the composite image also appears to the unaided eye to be at least in part in the plane of the sheeting.
The present invention will be further explained with reference to the appended Figures, wherein like structure is referred to by like numerals throughout the several views, and wherein:
a is a photomicrograph of a passport including composite images that appear to float above and appear to float below the sheeting;
The system of the present invention reads a composite image that appears to be suspended, or to float, above, in the plane of, and/or below a sheeting. The system of the present invention is also useful for providing information to a user whether or not a sheeting having such a composite image is authentic or not. The system of the present invention is for reading and authenticating a composite image that appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below a sheeting or both, such a floating composite image as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,842 B1, (“the '842 patent”), “Sheeting with Composite Image that Floats,” (Florczak et al.), which is owned by the same assignee as the present application, and which is hereby incorporated by reference. These composite images are actually three-dimensional, optical illusions, and they are perceived by the user to either be floating above or below the sheeting or both. The system of the present invention assists in calculating the distance that is perceived by the user between the composite image and the sheeting in this optical illusion.
Composite images that appear to the unaided eye to be floating above a sheeting, below a sheeting, or both, are suspended images and are referred to for convenience as floating images. The term “unaided eye” means normal (or corrected to normal) human vision not enhanced by, for example, magnification. These suspended or floating images may be either two or three-dimensional images, can be in black or white or in color, and can appear to move with the observer or change in shape. The sheeting that has a composite image may be viewed using light that impinges on the sheeting from the same side as the observer (reflected light), or from the opposite side of the sheeting as the observer (transmitted light), or both. One example of sheeting including such composite images is shown in
In one exemplary embodiment of sheeting containing such composite images as described above, the sheeting includes: (a) at least one layer of microlens, the layer having first and second sides; (b) a layer of material disposed adjacent the first side of the layer of microlens; and (c) an at least partially complete image formed in the material associated with each of a plurality of the microlens, where the image contrasts with the material. Microlens may also be called lenticular lens or microlenslets. The composite image is provided by the individual images, and it appears to the unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting, or both. The '842 patent provides a complete description of the microlens sheeting, exemplary material layers of such sheeting, some of which are preferably radiation sensitive material layers, examples of radiation sources for creating the individual images, and exemplary imaging processes.
The sheeting having a composite image as described in the '842 patent may be used in a variety of applications such as securing tamperproof images in passports, ID badges, event passes, affinity cards, or other documents of value, product identification formats and advertising promotions for verification and authenticity, brand enhancement images which provide a floating or sinking or a floating and sinking image of the brand, identification presentation images in graphics applications such as emblems for police, fire or other emergency vehicles; information presentation images in graphics applications such as kiosks, night signs and automotive dashboard displays, and novelty enhancement through the use of composite images on products such as business cards, hang-tags, art, shoes and bottled products. The system of the present invention for reading and authenticating sheeting having a composite image includes a reader for reading and authenticating any of the items mentioned above. For sake of simplicity, the figures of the present application illustrate a passport having a floating image and a passport reader for reading and authenticating the floating image. However, the system of the present invention may include any reader for reading and authenticating any item having a floating image.
In this embodiment of the passport 14, the composite images 30 or floating images 30 include three different types of floating images. The first type of floating image 30a is a “3M” that appears to the unaided eye to float above the page in the passport 14. The second type of floating image 30b is a “3M” that appears to the unaided eye to float below the page in the passport 14. The third type of floating image 30c is a sine wave that appears to the unaided eye to float above the page in the passport 14. When the passport 14 is tilted by a user, the floating images 30a, 30b, 30c may appear to move to the observer. In reality, the floating images 30a, 30b, 30c are optical illusions that appear to the viewer's unaided eye to be floating above or below the sheeting 20 or both. The passport 14 or document of value may include any combination of floating images that float above, below and/or in the plane of the passport 14. The floating images may be any configuration and may include words, symbols, or particular designs that correspond to the document of value. For instance, passports issued by the Australian government include microlens sheeting having floating images in the shape of a kangaroo and boomerangs, two symbols representing the country. The other pages of the passport booklet may contain blank pages for receiving a country's stamp, as the person is processed through customs.
In the past, when a passport has been presented to a customs official as the person is being processed through customs to either leave or enter in a country, the customs official would typically look at the passport 14 with his unaided eyes to see if the passport included the appropriate floating images 30 to verify that the passport was authentic. However, as counterfeiters become more and more sophisticated, it may become necessary in the future to provide systems that assist the official in verifying that the passport is authentic based on the security feature of the floating images. The system of the present invention first verifies that the passport or document of value contains at least one floating image 30. Then, the system verifies that the floating image 30 is the correct floating image 30. Lastly, the system verifies the perceived distance between the floating image 30 and the passport page having the microlens sheeting, known as the “floating distance.” If this floating distance is the correct distance or within some margin of error, then the system verifies or authenticates or otherwise communicates to the customs official that the passport is an authentic passport. If, however, the floating distance is not the correct distance, the system indicates to the customs official that the passport is a forgery or a fake. The system also helps reduce time and effort spent by the customs official processing the passport.
The passport reader 14 includes light source 52, a mirror 54, and at least a first camera 58. The reader 14 may optionally include a second camera 60 (
In an exemplary embodiment, the mirror 54 is positioned at a 45° angle relative to both the light source 52 and the camera 58. This arrangement is such that the light from the light source 52 is reflected off the half-silvered mirror, up to the microlens sheeting or substrate 20 through the glass 40, and then reflected back down through the half-silvered mirror 54 and into the camera 58, as illustrated in
The reader 10 may include a stationary camera 58, one moveable camera 58a, or two cameras 58, 60, as discussed in more detail in reference to
The system includes a computer 56 (illustrated as box 56) in communication with the camera 58. The computer 56 processes the information obtained by either the first camera 58, second camera 60 or both cameras 58, 60. Any computer known in the art is suitable to be used in the passport reader 10.
The measurements illustrated in
The first camera 58 includes a first camera lens 62 and a first camera image plane 66 and the second camera 60 includes a second camera lens 64 and a second camera image plane 68. The first and second cameras 58, 60 both include a focal length “f” of their lens 62, 64. Preferably, the first and second cameras 58, 60 are similar cameras with the same focal lengths. The first camera image plane 66 has a center point 78. The second camera image plane 68 has a center point 80. The local length “f” is measured from the center point of the camera image planes to the lens of the cameras. The first camera 58 takes a first picture, records or captures a first image of the sheeting 20 and the floating image 30. The second camera 60 takes a second picture, records or captures a second image of the sheeting 20 and the floating image 30. The first image of the microlens sheeting 20 is represented schematically on the first camera image plane 66 as reference number 70. The first image of the floating image 30 is represented schematically on the first camera image plane 66 as reference number 72. The second image of the microlens sheeting 20 is represented schematically on the second camera image plane 68 as reference number 74. The second image of the floating image 30 is represented on the second camera image plane 68 as reference number 76. The lens 62, 64 of the cameras 58, 60 are preferably orthogonal relative to the microlens sheeting 20.
Distance “a” is the distance between the second image 74 of the microlens sheeting on the camera image plane 68 and the center 80 of the camera image plane 68. Distance “b” is the distance between the second image 76 of the floating image 30 on the camera image plane 68 and the center 80 of the camera image plane 68. Distance “d” is the distance between the first image 72 of the floating image 30 on the camera image plane 66 and the center 78 of the camera image plane 66. Distance “c” is the distance between the first image 70 of the microlens sheeting on the camera image plane 66 and the center 78 of the camera image plane 66. Distance “e” is the known distance between the centers of the lens 62, 64 of the cameras. Distance “g” is the known orthogonal distance between the lens 62, 64 of the cameras 58, 60 and the microlens sheeting 20. A relational point other than the center point of lens could be used with appropriate modification of the math formulas.
As a result, the system can measure distances “a”, “b”, “c”, and “d”. The distances “e”, “f”, and “g” are known distances based on how the reader 10 is built. The floating distance or distance p is the unknown distance. The system calculates distance “p” using the measured distances and known distances as follows:
h/e=f/(d−b) and g/e=f(c−a)
Divide h/e and g/e by each other to cancel out the distances “e” and distances “f”:
which provides a calculation for distance “h”:
h=g(c−a)/(d−b)
Now that distance “h” can be calculated, the floating distance “p” can be calculated as follows:
p=g−h
The example below provides calculation of actual floating distance based on the formulas above.
The system's computer 56 calculates the floating distance “p.” Then, the computer can compare the floating distance to the database of floating distances. This enables inspection authorities to identify any anomalies or discrepancies between the data presented by a traveler and data held in databases. If the calculated floating distance matches the floating distance in the database for the identified composite image 30, then the system authenticates the sheeting 20. If the calculated floating distance does not match the floating distances in the database for the identified composite image 30, then the system determines that the sheeting is not authentic.
In the embodiments illustrated in
In another alternative embodiment of reader 14 (not illustrated), the reader may have a one fixed focal-length camera. In this embodiment, the single focus camera is moveable between a first position and a second position perpendicular to the sheeting 20. The camera moves along a track between the first position and the second position. First, the camera moves until the microlens sheeting 20 comes into full focus, which establishes the first position of the camera. Then the camera captures a first image of the sheeting 20 and the composite image 30. Next, the camera moves until the composite image 30 comes into full focus, which establishes the second position of the camera. In the second position, the camera captures a second image of the microlens sheeting 20 and the composite image 30. The distance between the first camera position and the second camera position is the distance “p” between the microlens sheeting 20 in the passport 14 and the perceived distance of the floating image 30 floating above or below the sheeting or both.
The reader 10 is capable of locating the floating image 30 and identifying the floating image 30. The camera will first record the floating image 30 and then the computer 56 will compare the recorded floating image 30 with a database of floating images to identify the floating image. The computer 56 preferably includes a template matching program or a normalization correlation matrix, which compares a known image with a recorded image. One example of a normalization correlation is described in Computer Vision by Dana Bollard and Christopher Brown, copyright 1982, published by Prentice Hall, Inc., pages 65-70, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The reader 10 may include radio-frequency identification (“RFID”) reading capabilities. For instance the reader 10 may include the features disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/953,200, “A Passport Reader for Processing a Passport Having an RFID Element,” (Jesme), which is hereby incorporated by reference. The system will read and authenticate a variety of different floating images.
In an additional embodiment, the floating distance may vary from one sheeting to another. Optionally, the system reads a security code embedded in the sheeting that contains information relating to the floating distance of that sheeting and authenticates the sheeting only if the calculated floating distance matches the floating distance provided in the security code. Alternatively, the security code is used to retrieve the proper floating distance from a database of floating distances.
The operation of the present invention will be further described with regard to the following detailed example, which for convenience references the Figures. These examples are offered to further illustrate the various specific and preferred embodiments and techniques. It should be understood, however, that many variations and modifications may be made while remaining within the scope of the present invention.
In this example, a single Micron Semiconductor 1.3 Mega-pixel color sensor camera from Micron Semiconductor, located in Boise, Id., and a microlens sheeting with a composite image floating at a known distance of 1 centimeter, +/−1 millimeter, was arranged as depicted in
A first image of the microlens sheeting and of the composite image was captured. The camera was then moved laterally and a second image of the microlens sheeting and the composite image was captured.
The first image of the microlens sheeting and composite image were first used to identify if the microlens sheeting had a composite image and to verify if the composite image was the correct image. The computer ran the template matching program which was based on the normalization correlation matrix disclosed in Computer Vision by Dana Bollard and Christopher Brown, published by Prentice-Hall, Inc., copyright 1982, pages 65-70, which has been incorporated by reference. Using the template matching program, the computer was able to identify at least one of the floating images and verify that the floating image was what was expected.
Distances ‘c−a’ and ‘d−b’ (
With g known and c−a and d−b now determined, h was calculated as follows.
h=g(c−a)/(d−b)=12.5(0.76)/(0.83)=11.45 centimeters
With h now determined and g known, p—the floating height of the composite image—was calculated as follows.
p=g−h=12.5−11.45=1.05 centimeters
As the known floating height of the composite image was 1 centimeter +/−1 millimeter, the measured floating height of 1.05 centimeters was within range. Therefore, the system verifies the security laminate with the floating images as an authentic security laminate.
The tests and test results described above are intended solely to be illustrative, rather than predictive, and variations in the testing procedure can be expected to yield different results.
The present invention has now been described with reference to several embodiments thereof. The foregoing detailed description and example have been given for clarity of understanding only. No unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom. All patents and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes can be made in the embodiments described without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the exact details and structures described herein, but rather by the structures described by the language of the claims, and the equivalents of those structures.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1905716 | Ives | Apr 1933 | A |
1918705 | Ives | Jul 1933 | A |
2039648 | Ives | May 1936 | A |
2063985 | Coffey | Dec 1936 | A |
2279825 | Kaszab | Apr 1942 | A |
2326634 | Gebhard et al. | Aug 1943 | A |
2500511 | Bonnet | Mar 1950 | A |
2622472 | Bonnet | Dec 1952 | A |
2833176 | Ossoinak | May 1958 | A |
3154872 | Nordgren | Nov 1964 | A |
3161509 | Howe et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3306974 | Cunnally | Feb 1967 | A |
3357770 | Clay | Dec 1967 | A |
3365350 | Cahn | Jan 1968 | A |
3442569 | Bonnet | May 1969 | A |
3459111 | Cooper, Jr. | Aug 1969 | A |
3503315 | Montebello | Mar 1970 | A |
3584369 | Montebello | Jun 1971 | A |
3607273 | Kinney | Sep 1971 | A |
3613539 | Dudley | Oct 1971 | A |
3676130 | Burckhardt et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3706486 | de Montebello | Dec 1972 | A |
3751258 | Howe et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3801183 | Sevelin et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
4034555 | Rosenthal | Jul 1977 | A |
4082426 | Brown | Apr 1978 | A |
4099838 | Cook et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4121011 | Glover et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4200875 | Galanos | Apr 1980 | A |
4315665 | Haines | Feb 1982 | A |
4424990 | White et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4541727 | Rosenthal | Sep 1985 | A |
4552442 | Street | Nov 1985 | A |
4557590 | Winnek | Dec 1985 | A |
4618552 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4629667 | Kistner et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634220 | Hockert et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4650283 | Orensteen et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4668063 | Street | May 1987 | A |
4688894 | Hockert | Aug 1987 | A |
4691993 | Porter et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4708920 | Orensteen et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4714656 | Bradshaw et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4732453 | de Montebello et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743526 | Ando et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757350 | Street | Jul 1988 | A |
4775219 | Appeldorn et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4799739 | Newswanger | Jan 1989 | A |
4927238 | Green et al. | May 1990 | A |
4935335 | Fotland | Jun 1990 | A |
5064272 | Bailey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5169707 | Faykish et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5254390 | Lu | Oct 1993 | A |
5279912 | Telfer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5330799 | Sandor et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5359454 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5449597 | Sawyer | Sep 1995 | A |
5455689 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5554432 | Sandor et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5594841 | Schutz | Jan 1997 | A |
5639580 | Morton | Jun 1997 | A |
5642226 | Rosenthal | Jun 1997 | A |
5644431 | Magee | Jul 1997 | A |
5671089 | Allio | Sep 1997 | A |
5680171 | Lo et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681676 | Telfer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689372 | Morton | Nov 1997 | A |
5717844 | Lo et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5744291 | Ip | Apr 1998 | A |
5757550 | Gulick, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5850278 | Lo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850580 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5896230 | Goggins | Apr 1999 | A |
6084713 | Rosenthal | Jul 2000 | A |
6095566 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6288842 | Krasa et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6791723 | Vallmajo et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6919892 | Cheiky et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
20020054434 | Krasa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020126396 | Dolgoff | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030116630 | Carey et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050057812 | Raber | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2326180 | Oct 1999 | CA |
198 04 997 | Feb 1999 | DE |
0 314 134 | May 1989 | EP |
0 583 766 | Feb 1994 | EP |
1 130 541 | Sep 2001 | EP |
7-281327 | Oct 1995 | JP |
WO 8303019 | Sep 1983 | WO |
WO 0222376 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 03005075 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03022598 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060119876 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |