This invention relates to a remote time clock activation and identification system for a game clock such as those used in basketball games.
In many sports, such as basketball, a contest is divided into specific time periods or durations of play which require accurate timing. The play periods are frequently interrupted for time outs including those for official or television commercial reasons, time outs allocated to each team, fouls called by the officials, and for time clock violations. Such fouls or actions requiring penalties must be assessed to the player committing the foul, and play is stopped to allow, for example, any applicable free throws resulting from the foul. In addition, officials may stop play for a wet floor or an injured player.
As a result, the official time clock is frequently started and stopped upon such actions of any of the officials or the timekeeper. Officials typically signal the stop and start of play by whistles and the corresponding starting and stopping of the official time clock is effectuated by the timekeeper pressing a button. Alternatively, the official time clock may be started and stopped remotely and automatically by the officials' whistles using equipment such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,354, issued Mar. 8, 1994 to Michael J. Costabile and U.S. Pat. No. 7,920,052 issued Apr. 5, 2011 to Michael J. Costabile, both of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety.
Existing technology has limitations. For example, existing technology requires that the officials use a specific whistle that is recognized by the system. Moreover, existing technology recognizes only that a whistle has been blown, but can't identify the specific whistle. This is less than ideal because it is often desirable in a multi-whistle environment to know the specific whistle, and therefore the specific official, that actuated the time clock.
Identifying the specific whistle that actuates the time clock is important in a variety of situations. For example, problems may be encountered when there is an inadvertent blowing of the whistle by an official who may be reluctant to own up to the error, or even by a spectator, or inadvertent pressing of the start/stop button by the timekeeper. Being able to identify which official blew his whistle is also important when multiple whistles are blown, and when calls by officials are in question.
Also, sports operations staff for sports associations such as the National Basketball Association (“NBA”) and college conference offices routinely review videotapes of all games in their quality and accuracy review of the calls by the officials, and to insure and preserve the integrity of the game. Officials do make mistakes which can affect which team wins a particular game. Moreover, the overall environment is often loud with shouting by spectators and bands playing. When officials are later determined to have made a serious error, particularly one affecting the outcome of a game, they may be punished such as by suspension for a specified period. The potential of after-game detection and punishment of officiating error encourages diligence and correct performance by officials. Moreover, because of potential bias or other improprieties, it is important that official calls be scrutinized, even after a game is completed.
Since officials frequently signal a game stopping event such as a foul by three or four quick whistle blasts, the blasts of two officials may be simultaneous or overlapping. An analysis for quality control review of the event is helped by the precise and reliable recording of the whistle blasts and identification of the officials involved.
Television replays are not designed to present an accurate review of the actions of officials and do not identify who blew a whistle first in the case of multiple whistles. Moreover, if television playback is slowed down to closely examine a play, the whistle blasts frequently become inaudible.
As a result, it is highly desirous to have a reliable record of each starting and stopping of play along with the identity of the initiator of such actions.
In accordance with one form of the invention, a record of the sonic fingerprint of the whistle blowing by the individuals officiating a sports event is digitally stored prior to commencement of the event, for subsequent comparison with whistles blown during the event in order to identify which individual blew the whistle during the event and to initiate actions, be it stopping play or starting play.
The sonic signal sensed by a microphone located close to the whistle worn by officials is passed through a band pass filter and then digitized for comparison with the stored signals to identify which official blew the whistle.
The band of frequencies obtained by a Fast Fourier Transform are processed to identify and store the highest amplitude resonant or center frequency signal. Also stored are the signals representing the next strongest resonant frequencies above and below the center frequency signal to provide a multiplicity of frequencies for comparison of the stored fingerprints with whistle blows during the sporting event. To minimize false acceptance and increase reliability while detecting a valid whistle, multiple parameters are measured and compared to the stored standard.
Those whistle signals for which there is a match are displayed and stored with identification of which official initiated the action and at what time the action was used to activate the official time clock, be it stopping play or starting play. They are also as indicated by the time clock response.
Many variables can affect how a whistle sounds each time it is blown, such as the way an individual blows air into it, or the way he/she holds it, or even the environment that it's in, whether inside a small room or a large gym or a crowded coliseum. Because of these variables, a certain level of tolerance must be accepted as to whether one whistle blow compares to another. But too much tolerance will cause false acceptances.
As used herein, the following terms shall apply:
The following structure numbers refer to the following structures among the various figures:
An overview of activation system 10 for a basketball game is depicted in
Referring to
Each official, 100, 101 and 102 carries one microphone 22 in close proximity to their whistle 50, preferably attached to the official's whistle cord, or on their shirt in the vicinity of the neck portion.
Microphones 22 produce sonic signals 23 which pass through filter amplifiers 25 which include a multi-feedback band-pass filter which has somewhat sharp rejection drop-offs at the outer band frequencies, for example the following parameters:
Multiple Feedback Band Pass @ 3 KHz
Damping Ratio=1.01 Q=0.493
Gain ×20 Amplifier
Lower Freqcutoff @ −3 db=˜1.25 KHz
Upper Freqcutoff @ −3 db=7.5 KHz
HPF Slope 2 KHZ to 200 HZ=−12 db/decade
LPF Slope 6 KHZ to 600 KHZ=−24 db/decade
LPF Slope 600 KHz to 6 MHz=−48 db/decade
The sharp rejection of the outer bands helps eliminate unwanted harmonics and other frequencies with large amplitudes such that they are not further processed. The signal within the band pass is amplified to a usable level without clipping, since clipping would cause harmonics that could result in a false detection.
Amplified sonic signals 23 are sampled by voltage comparator 27 to determine if they are of a large enough amplitude or strength for further processing. The signal sensitivity level determines which signals pass through voltage comparator 27. The selected audio frequency signals 28 are then transmitted by radio transmitters 29 to base station 30 shown in
Referring for a moment to
Referring next to
Referring to
The next highest amplitude signal within the band of frequencies above the center frequency is taken and stored as the first upper harmonic frequency, after which the next highest amplitude within the band of frequencies above the first upper harmonic frequency is taken and stored as the second upper harmonic frequency which together form the overtone frequencies.
The selection from the frequencies below the center frequency or undertone frequencies include those two frequencies with the next highest amplitude below the center frequency to obtain a sonic fingerprint 36 of the whistle blow including a center frequency and two overtone frequencies above and two undertone frequencies below the center frequency.
These five frequencies shown on
Subsequent sonic signals 23 pass through the filter of amplifier filter 25 which then pass through the level setting of voltage comparator 27 (see
Referring back to
As shown in
Once the desired signal match level or strength is set by the timekeeper the system not only passes and identifies all whistle signals which meet or exceed the match level but also records in percent (%) the actual level. This enables the identification of those officials with a weak or barely passable whistle blowing level to enable instructing those officials to blow their whistle more strongly to avoid any possibility of very weak whistle blows for which the subject time clock activation and identification system would be unresponsive.
It is preferable that the standard samples of the officials' sonic fingerprints are obtained and stored shortly before commencement of play by having each official blow his or her whistle 50 for that purpose. (Step 5 of
Sonic fingerprints stored in central sonic fingerprint file 39 at a remote location 70 can be provided to the comparator storage 37 as needed, usually by the official timekeeper, prior to the sporting event.
A method of using system 10 is set forth in
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims. By way of example, the system could be used in connection with other time-sensitive games and sports such as soccer, football, team handball, water polo, volleyball, wrestling and lacrosse. Also, a variety of different noisemakers, including bullhorns, musical instruments, alarms and/or and digital noisemakers could be used. Also, instead of stopping a time clock, the present invention could be modified to initiate a camera upon an auditory signal such as opening a door, squeaking a floor board, or breaking a window, which has security applications. Also, the system could be modified to identify which gun has been shot in an environment having multiple weapons. This could have security, gaming, hunting, and/or law enforcement applications. The system could also be modified to recognize certain sounds such as emergency vehicles, specific crying babies, specific animals, machine failure, and so forth, and activate the desired apparatus such as camera, lights, medical equipment, signal notification device, and so forth. As used herein, “approximately” and the like shall mean+/−10%, unless such a range would be nonsensical, such as a negative length. All ranges set forth shall include the endpoints themselves, as well as all increments there between.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/048594 | 9/4/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/039693 | 3/9/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4215856 | Schmall | Aug 1980 | A |
5293354 | Costabile | Mar 1994 | A |
20030058744 | Calace | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050195331 | Sugano | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20100085167 | Costabile | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100134614 | Aman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110263319 | Hamalainen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120002509 | Saguin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20170186414 | Ellingson | Jun 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO0073858 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180204391 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |