The invention relates to the management and handling and material and objects in a confined environment, particularly in the field of nuclear installations. It relates in particular to the problem relative to equipment maintenance in confined and controlled installations, in particular to the separation of two chambers tightly connected and having to be separated, the inside of each chamber having to remain confined.
In processing installations and installations for contaminated materials, in the nuclear field, it is common to use two equipment items each made up of a chamber, among other things, and which are operatively connected in a vacuum-tight manner. In the framework of maintenance for these equipment items, they commonly must be separated from each other. To this end, it is desirable to control the dispersion of pollution resulting from the chambers, toward the rest of the installation. Several reference solutions are known and described in works on standards for nuclear centers, in particular under the title “enceintes de confinement et éléments de transfert—chapitre IV.2” (“confinement chambers and transfer elements—chapter IV.2”) as well as the NF ISO 1 933-3 standard, “composant et enceinte de confinement” (“confinement component and chamber”).
A first technique consists of using a bag made of a flexible and tight material, such as a vinyl bag, tightly around the junction plane of the two equipment items to be separated. It is then possible to mechanically separate the two elements from each other, create two tight chambers at each end of the flexible bag, and cut the bag in two between the chambers thus formed to free the two equipment items, one part of the bag keeping each chamber closed. This method is inexpensive, but difficult to execute on large flanges. Moreover, the use of bolted flanges prohibits the use of the double groove needed to fix the flexible bag. In the case of heavy equipment, resting on legs, implementation of this solution is complicated. Also, in the case of material having large diameters, operative implementation with nuclear ventilation is difficult due to the vacuum. However, it presents the advantage of allowing realization without interrupting the confinement, with static sealing.
Another solution consists of using a tight double door transfer system. In this case, the two equipment items to be connected each have an identical tight door. These two equipment items are then placed against each other at the level of the tight doors, which are made integral with each other. This two-door unit is then removed from the two opening frames, thereby freeing the passage. This method is relatively simple and pollution-resistant, but quite costly. Moreover, it is not designed for use under vacuum. It is linked to the use of a glove box or a telemanipulator, which makes it possible to simultaneously open the two doors through the inside of the equipment.
The purpose of the invention is therefore to propose a system allowing two items of equipment comprising chambers, placed tightly connected relative to the vacuum, to be easily separated, safely and tightly, while avoiding the described drawbacks relative to the two methods described above.
To the end, the main purpose of the invention is a system for separating two equipment items each having a chamber having to be operatively linked to the chamber of the other equipment item, this operative link requiring vacuum-tightness and it being desirable to control the dispersion of pollution toward the exterior of the equipment items, during maintenance operations.
According to the invention, the system comprises:
In this way, the two equipment items may be separated from each other, the two chambers each being independently hermetically sealed by a closure plate.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the means for blocking the slot are made up of a longitudinal cover.
This is advantageously completed by a cover seal.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, a sealing joint is used between the male flange and the female flange, in a different plane parallel to that defined by the slot and the closure plane of the closure plates. This means not having a joint straddling, which is to say in the same plane as, the mechanical link between the two closure plates and allows the possibility of vacuum-tightness.
To facilitate the maintenance and invention of closure plates against each other, each of these plates has at least two strips each bearing on a strip of the other plate.
Moreover, there is preferably a handle on one of the closure plates, preferably on the larger of the two plates.
To perfect the tightness of the assembly formed by the two plates, the use of a plate joint is also provided for, this plate joint being placed between the two plates, over the entire periphery thereof.
To improve the pollution-resistance, it is also useful to use a pollution joint around the opening of the slot to insulate this slot.
Lastly, a double groove is provided for on the exterior part of the confinement flange for fixing of a sealing bag allowing the disassembly and introduction of closure plates, without interrupting the confinement.
The invention and its various technical characteristics will be better understood upon reading the following description, accompanied by several figures, respectively illustrating:
This confinement flange 10 assembly remains fixed in place on the installation during disassembly of the equipment item. It is in fact part of the installation.
Two important elements of the system according to the invention are made up of the female 20A and male 20B closure plates, also called female and male “guillotines”. These elements are illustrated in
In
On the surface of each of the closure plates 20A and 20B located opposite the other closure plate, there are several strips 23, namely at least two, horizontal, each placed so as to rest against a strip of the opposite plate for the purpose of facilitating the insertion and removal of the assembly formed by the two closure plates, by transmitting the effort for causing the assembly to move relative to the confinement flange. Moreover, they are used to stiffen each of the closure plates. These strips 23 may be magnetized to facilitate the simultaneous insertion of the two closure plates in the slot 12 of the confinement flange 10.
In
A cover joint 27 is also placed between the bearing surface of the cover 11 and the upper surface of the female flange 10A, on both sides of the slot 12.
A pollution joint 28 is placed on either side of the upper part of the female closure plate 20A to insulate the opening of the slot 12.
Lastly, the plate joint 21 has also been illustrated.
In
In reference to
The first step consists of removing the cover 11 held by fixing screws on the female flange. Given that there is a vacuum inside the installation, this is kept in place. It may potentially be secured there by wing screws.
The second operation consists of bringing the assembly of the two closure plates 20a and 20B forming a guillotine, through a vinyl sack 31 fixed on the double groove referenced as 15 in
The third phase is illustrated by
In reference to
The interest of the proposed solution is to make it possible to insert, simply, from the outside, closure plates forming guillotines, to limit the dissemination of pollution, during disassembly. The steps which must follow an operation of this type are local decontamination of the zone defined in particular by
This assembly constitutes a passive mechanism, requiring no maintenance, other than monitoring of the sealing joint 26 serving to maintain the vacuum.
The bulk of the assembly is limited.
In the framework of the use of nuclear ventilation, the dimensions of the vinyl bag to be implemented are relatively reduced and the manipulation of this bag is easy and accessible.
The confinement flange therefore makes it possible to ensure that in case of an interruption in the confinement, the passage cross-section is reduced to the passage cross-section of the closure plates, meaning that of the slot 12 of the confinement flange 10. This makes it possible to better manage the gauging of the ventilation of the nuclear installation, gauged, among other things, according to the necessary safety flows and proportionate to the passage cross-section in accident mode.
The principle of this type of guillotine is already used in industrial environments for which the cleanliness class is monitored. One may think in particular of installations relative to the optics industry. In these applications, the plates used as guillotines are then inserted at the level of the junction plane between the two concerned interfaces. On the contrary, in the present case, the insertion plane of the two closure plates is different from the joint plane defined by the position of the sealing joint 26 between the two male 10B and female 10A confined flanges.
The confinement flanges are useful in the case of a vacuum process where one wishes to maintain confinement, during disassembly of part of the equipment, after returning to atmospheric pressure, one may think in particular of radiological confinement, of cleanliness and chemical.
This system is intended to be applied first to an installation implementing a high-intensity laser, in which the experiment chamber is placed under vacuum, during a firing and to a radiological confinement function. The confinement flanges may then be used for disassembly of insertion systems, during the establishment of diagnostics in a transitory phase or during a period of increased radiological risk where one wishes to disassemble the equipment under confinement, without using costly systems, such as those described in the paragraphs on the prior art.
In the nuclear field, this system makes it possible to disassemble equipment having occasional maintenance and which does not justify the presence of a gate or a tight double door transfer system and for which maintenance in confinement is difficult.
Lastly, the flanges may be used for the disassembly of portholes under vacuum, for which one may wish to control dust accumulation during intervention. In this case, it is the outside environment which is considered to be the polluting environment.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
05 51438 | May 2005 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2006/050488 | 5/29/2006 | WO | 00 | 11/21/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/003825 | 1/11/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4009727 | Bailey | Mar 1977 | A |
4235257 | Wolf | Nov 1980 | A |
4666270 | Hager | May 1987 | A |
4732527 | Conche | Mar 1988 | A |
4866286 | Baatz et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4897963 | Reboul et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5020776 | Owens et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
6375157 | Van de Lande | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6672139 | Pampinella | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6997041 | Metzger et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7325442 | Pampinella et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7731242 | Coscarella | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20030194042 | Singh et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0212028 | Aug 1985 | EP |
0312460 | Oct 1988 | EP |
2613526 | Apr 1986 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080199291 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |