The present invention relates generally to the environmental control of storm water and its associated contaminants.
It is well known in the art that wastewater can be collected into a separator tank to remove debris. Separator tanks have long been used to separate oils from water. Generally, these debris or oils may be called contaminants.
The use of separator tanks poses two problems when used to treat waste water. One, high flow rates create turbulence. The turbulence diminishes the ability of separator tanks to separate the contaminants. The turbulence may also re-mobilize the already separated contaminants, placing the contaminants back into the waste water to be treated. To avoid these undesired effects, the separator tanks must be made significantly large to overcome the effects of turbulence. Second, the separator tanks must be made large enough to perform during peaks in flow. Peaks in flow mean higher flow rates, causing two effects which impact the total amount of contaminants contained in these flows. First, the high flow rate brings a higher volume of liquid and overall more contaminants. Second, the high flow rate has increased contaminant carrying capacity owing to the higher flow rate itself. These two factors, combined, would result in greater total contaminants being brought to the separator tank during peak flows. This phenomenon is particularly apparent with treatment of storm water runoff, where the initial storm water contains the bulk of the contaminants, being the “first flush” of the drainage area. However, there is a limit to the total amount of contaminants available. Even though the high flow rates are capable of carrying and remobilizing a greater amount of contaminants, the drainage area has already been washed by the initial flush of storm water. After this initial flush of storm water, the separator tank then experiences relatively high flow of water that is relatively free of contaminants. If the separator tank is too small, these high flows will remobilize the already separated contaminants. Again, the separator tanks must be designed to be large enough so that these peak high volumes and flow rate do not remobilize the contaminants.
The large size requirements for separator tanks limit their usefulness to treat liquids of variable or high flow. Many attempts have been made to reduce the size requirements of the separator tank.
Of note, U.S. Pat. No. 4,578,188 to Cousino teaches a method to allow low flow to fall into a separator tank or other disposal and high flow to jump across a gap. The gap is contained within a weir such that extremely high flow completely bypasses the gap. Presumably, the low flow will spill into the settlement tank along with its carried contaminants while the high flow has enough kinetic energy to continue on.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,985,148 to Monteith teaches a nearly identical and simplified method to achieve a similar result. Monteith dispenses with the gap but continues to use the weir, dumping all low flow into an integrated separator tank. As the separator tank fills, the separated water in the separator tank exits downstream of the weir. Monteith teaches a way to house the weir, separator tank, and return from separator tank all in a single container.
The present invention improves environmental control of waste water. The present invention provides a method of installing an environmental control system so as to allow for separate sizing of treatment and bypass capacity while also offering the ability to make or change either treatment or bypass capacities at different times. This is accomplished by containing the treatment and bypass functions in separate chambers, using screen, baffle, or coalescing media pack to further refine effectiveness and capacity of each structure independently. The control structure and interceptor structure may be pre-engineered to a variety of sizes, capacities, or other specifications. This allows simple selection of a specific control structure and a specific interceptor structure from a variety of combinations, eliminating the need for custom engineering for each installation.
While both teachings of Cousino and Monteith provide a way to limit the kinetic energy in the separator area while at the same time allowing high flow to bypass the separator tank altogether, their methods are both limited to a certain range of useful flow rates and contaminant load. It is an object of the present invention to expand the range of useful flow rates and contaminant loads as well as enable application of a greater diversity of separation techniques. As such, the present invention is more desirous and offers significant advantages over the prior art.
It is a further object of this invention to allow fluids to exit the control structure from the side independent of location of a treatment compartment, resulting in the ability to control the quality or ratio of separation for various flow rates.
An object as well as advantage is that different control structure size requirements over treatment interceptor structure sizes may be chosen. With the present invention, these sizes may be independently determined.
The features of the treatment interceptor structure and the specific separation means employed may be designed independently from the control structure.
Either control structure or treatment interceptor structure may be installed at different times, allowing retrofits to existing installations of either.
An advantage of the present invention is its ability to retrofit existing manholes.
The control structure may be designed to allow multiple connections to an array of inlet sources or treatment interceptor structures. The control structure can act as a stand-alone junction box.
The physical separation of control structure from treatment interceptor structure results in more predictable operation.
Independent sizing of the control structure may be guided by the customer's drainage pipe sizes, reflecting the anticipated maximum capacity of surge flow.
Independent sizing of the treatment interceptor structure and choice of filtering methods reflect the amount and type of anticipated waste pollutants needed to be captured.
A further object and advantage of the present invention is to introduce an environmental control system whereby the coalescing plate media do not have to be disassembled for their proper cleaning. With the present invention, the coalescing plate media are readily and effectively cleaned in situ.
A further object and advantage is to manufacture the control structure and interceptor structure to a variety of pre-engineered performance specifications. Customers are then able to select a combination of control structure and interceptor structure pairs without the need for custom engineering.
The present invention and its advantages will be better understood by referring to the following detailed description and the attached drawings in which:
Interceptor partition 60 generally divides the interior of interceptor structure 50 into two chambers, upstream interceptor chamber 55 and downstream interceptor chamber 58. Treatment water inlet pipe 40 enters that portion of interceptor structure 50 comprising upstream interceptor chamber 55. The second end of treatment water inlet pipe 40 attaches to a first end of interceptor inlet pipe 62, which bends downward into upstream interceptor chamber 55. The second end of interceptor inlet pipe 62 opens into upstream interceptor chamber 55. Liquids held within upstream interceptor chamber 55 communicate via an opening in interceptor partition 60. Interceptor debris screen 70 covers said opening in interceptor partition 60. Media pack frame 67 is affixed to interceptor structure 50, preferably affixed to the interceptor partition 60, downstream of interceptor debris screen 70 and preferably contained within downstream interceptor chamber 58.
Coalescing media pack 65 is placed into media pack frame 67. In the preferred embodiment, coalescing media pack 65 is comprised of multiple plates stacked in a horizontal fashion, at a spacing typically approximately one-quarter to one-half inch. The plates have bi-directional corrugations forming crests and valleys in two directions. The crests and valleys include bleed holes for passage there through of immiscible components mixed with the fluid undergoing treatment. The bi-directional corrugations are approximately orthogonal to one another and approximately sinusoidal. Generally, the wavelength of the corrugations in one direction is greater than the wavelength of corrugations in the other direction, and it is preferred that the direction of flow be parallel to the corrugations formed by the longer wavelengths. Such coalescing media plates are available from Facet International of Tulsa, Oklahoma under the trademark of Mpak® coalescing plates.
A first end of interceptor outlet pipe 64 opens into downstream interceptor chamber 58. The second end of interceptor outlet pipe 64 bends outward and attaches to one end of treatment water outlet pipe 45. An outlet cutoff valve 46 may be inserted in the flow path of treatment water outlet pipe 45, as will be illustrated in
Coalescing media pack 65 is preferably installed so as to allow for in situ cleaning. This is accomplished by placing the bleed holes of coalescing media pack 65 generally upright so as to allow for ease of access from interceptor extension riser 75.
In an alternate embodiment, a surface grate positioned over the top of upstream control chamber 30 replaces, or is placed in addition to, upstream convergence drain pipe 26a. Fluids washing from the surface fall through the surface grate, into upstream control chamber 30 for further processing.
The present invention is a method of installing an environmental control system so as to allow for separate sizing of treatment and bypass capacity while also offering the ability to make or change either treatment or bypass capacities at different times. This is accomplished by containing the treatment and bypass functions in separate chambers, using screen, baffle, or coalescing media pack to further refine effectiveness and capacity of each structure independently.
The control structure and interceptor structure may be pre-engineered to a variety of sizes, capacities, or other specifications. This allows simple selection of a specific control structure and a specific interceptor structure from a variety of combinations, eliminating the need for custom engineering for each installation.
In typical operation, storm water flows into control structure 28 by way of upstream convergence pipe 26a. Control partition 38 retains the storm water and its associated debris generally in upstream control chamber 30. Storm water exits upstream control chamber 30 by way of treatment water inlet pipe 40. A treatment debris screen 36 may be used to prevent debris from entering treatment water inlet pipe 40. Fluid levels inside upstream control chamber 30 rise when incoming flow exceeds the capacity of treatment water inlet pipe 40 to drain upstream control chamber 30. Should upstream control chamber 30 fill across control partition 38, fluids in that event will exit upstream control chamber 30 and enter into downstream control chamber 31. Control debris screen 35 retains debris in upstream control chamber 30, preventing debris from entering downstream control chamber 31.
Fluids from treatment water inlet pipe 40 enter upstream interceptor chamber 55 via interceptor inlet pipe 62. Diffusion baffle 53 disperses the flow from interceptor inlet pipe 62 to reduce the velocity of the entering fluids, thereby reducing the amount of disturbance of contaminants contained in upstream interceptor chamber 55. Interceptor inlet pipe 62 is positioned so as to expel entering fluids towards the lower portion of upstream interceptor chamber 55, allowing less dense fluids, such as oils, to separate towards the upper portion of upstream interceptor chamber 55. Debris tend to settle towards the lower portion of upstream interceptor chamber 55. Interceptor debris screen 70 is positioned above the lowest portion of upstream interceptor chamber 55 and the highest portion of upstream interceptor chamber 55, preventing debris from passing from upstream interceptor chamber 55 to downstream interceptor chamber 58. Coalescing media pack 65 is positioned downstream of interceptor debris screen 70 and generally within downstream interceptor chamber 58, receiving fluids passing from upstream interceptor chamber 55 to downstream interceptor chamber 58. Coalescing media pack 65 generally removes additional oils from the water and also further disperses the flow to reduce flow velocity, creating a fluid environment relatively more quiet than that experienced in upstream interceptor chamber 55. Interceptor outlet pipe 64 opens towards the lower portion of downstream interceptor chamber 58, where fluids tend to be free of debris and oils. Interceptor outlet pipe 64 rises towards and connects to treatment water outlet pipe 45. Treated fluids flow into interceptor outlet pipe 64 and out of interceptor structure 50 by way of treatment water outlet pipe 45. Treatment water outlet pipe 45 enters control structure 28 into downstream control chamber 31, which is downstream from control partition 38. Fluids entering the downstream side of control partition 38, from either treatment water outlet pipe 45 or from upstream control chamber 30, exit control structure 28 by way of downstream convergence drain pipe 26b. Control partition 38 generally prevents treated fluids from back flowing into upstream control chamber 30.
Maintenance and cleaning of control structure 28 is accomplished by entering via control access cover 34 and control extension riser 32. Debris may be removed from either upstream control chamber 30 or downstream control chamber 31. Maintenance and cleaning of interceptor structure 50 is accomplished by entering via interceptor access cover 77 and interceptor extension riser 75. Debris, oils, or other contaminants may be removed from either upstream interceptor chamber 55 or downstream interceptor chamber 58. Coalescing media pack 65 may be cleaned by introducing a nozzle through the bleed holes of coalescing media pack 65.
In alternate embodiments, the present invention offers flexibility by choosing the type of control structure used. The control structure can take the form of a typical control manhole, an open ditch containing a weir, a pumped method, or by modifying other existing structures. Elimination of the use of the control structure offers total treatment of all stormwater.
Although the description above contains many specifications, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this present invention. Persons skilled in the art will understand that the method and apparatus described herein may be practiced, including but not limited to, the embodiments described. Further, it should be understood that the invention is not to be unduly limited to the foregoing which has been set forth for illustrative purposes. Various modifications and alternatives will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the true scope of the invention, as defined in the following claims. While there has been illustrated and described particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated that numerous changes and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art, and it is intended in the appended claims to cover those changes and modifications which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.
Thus, the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/987,126, filed Nov. 12, 2004, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/520,001, filed Nov. 14, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60520001 | Nov 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10987126 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 12327948 | US |