The present invention relates to the distribution of software applications and, in particular, the secure and vetted distribution of said applications along with provisions to protect data used by said applications.
The deployment of personal electronic devices has reached an all time high. These devices include smart telephones, with large memories, contacts data, and web access, as well as tablet computers. With the growing capabilities of such devices, there is no doubt that personal productivity rises. However, the proliferation of these devices creates several management problems in the work environment. These problems are the security of company data that a device could collect, the transfer of that data to a company computer, the use of applications that are trustworthy, and the availability of applications as new ones become available.
Security of Data Collected by a Device
If an employee of a company uses a personal electronic device to capture data, contacts, pictures, or video, the information must be kept secure. This means that there must be some level of password control or encryption to prevent unwanted access to the information, while at the same time allowing the user to access his or her personal information.
Transfer of Data from the Device to a Company Computer
Information that is captured by the device needs to be transferable to a company computer and removed from the device. Therefore, the device must be able to link of with a company computer, perhaps remotely, and transfer its data to that computer in a secure transmission.
Use of Trustworthy Applications
Not every application that operates on a personal electronic device is trustworthy. Some applications access the Web and other resources to accomplish their functions, possibly exposing sensitive data outside of a secure domain in which the application might be operating. Therefore, there needs to be a way to vet applications to assure that minimum standards are met.
Availability of New Applications
Many new applications for personal electronic devices are being developed. It is desirable to vet these new applications and make them available to users of personal electronic devices.
One embodiment of the present invention is a method for deploying applications to endpoint devices, where the method includes: obtaining an application for an endpoint device, where the endpoint device has a particular user and the application includes application logic; launching the application; during the launching of the application, connecting the application to a gateway, determining whether the application is bound to the endpoint device, and halting the launch of the application if the application is not bound to the endpoint device; determining the authenticity of the user; determining whether the application is bound to the user; and invoking the application logic on the endpoint device if the application is bound to the user and to the device and the user is authenticated.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a method of distributing applications where the method includes: receiving an instance of an application into an application distribution system, where the application includes application logic, the application distribution system includes one or more marketplaces with at least one marketplace receiving the instance of the application, and the marketplaces have at least one policy that can be enforced when the application is executed on an endpoint device; and performing an analysis of the application logic according to the at least one policy to ensure that said logic complies with said one or more policies.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is a method for deploying applications to endpoint devices, where the method includes: obtaining an application for an endpoint device, where the endpoint device has a particular user and the application includes application logic; launching the application; determining the authenticity of the user; determining whether the application is bound to the user; and invoking the application logic on the endpoint device if the application is bound to the user and the user is authenticated.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is a method for deploying applications to endpoint devices, where the method includes: obtaining an application for an endpoint device, where the endpoint device has a particular user and said application includes application logic; launching the application; during the launching of the application, connecting the application to a gateway, determining whether the application is bound to the endpoint device, and halting the launch of the application if the application is not bound to the endpoint device; determining the authenticity of the user; and invoking the application logic on the endpoint device if the application is bound to the endpoint device and the user is authenticated.
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is a method for deploying applications to endpoint devices, where the method includes: obtaining an application for an endpoint device, where the endpoint device has a particular user and said application includes application logic; launching the application; during the launching of the application, connecting the application to a gateway, determining whether the application is bound to the endpoint device, and halting the launch of the application if the application is not bound to the endpoint device; determining whether the application is bound to the user; and invoking the application logic on the endpoint device if the applications is bound to the user and to the endpoint device.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
The invention consists of three major components:
(1) An application framework, consisting of executable code and data, which is bundled with an instance of application logic, also consisting of executable code and data, in order to form an application.
(2) An application distribution system, composed of a network of application marketplaces or “app stores”. The purpose of a marketplace is to validate and accept or reject submitted instances of application logic, and to distribute instances of application logic to other marketplaces, and possibly to distribute applications to computation endpoints.
(3) A gateway, which constrains application access to data, such that authentication and authorization policies are enforced. The gateway also supports data collection for analysis and report generation, as well as live troubleshooting of deployed applications.
The Framework
The application framework 12 is combined with an instance of application logic 11 to form an application that can be executed on computation endpoint. Based on policy, the framework ensures that all local data is encrypted, and that all network traffic is encrypted. The framework, based on policy, manages encryption keys. The framework also enforces user authentication policy for the application. By handling all of these security and policy enforcement aspects, the application logic is not required to consider them.
Referring to
In some embodiments, when an application is launched, it attempts to connect to a gateway, depending on policy, as in steps 218, 284, 314. If the application is bound to a specific device as in steps 220, 286, 316, the framework presents a device-binding token to the gateway, as in step 402 of
After application launch, and after the verification of the device-binding token, if required by policy, user authentication is performed, as in steps 206, 256, 276. The protocol for authentication is determined by policy. For example, in one version, one application is required to perform only password-based authentication as in step 422 of
After a successful authentication, if the application is bound to a specific user, as in step 602 of
After success in any user authentication or device/user-binding checks, the application logic is invoked, as in steps 212, 262, 280, 310. Any access to local data storage by the application logic is via framework data APIs. These APIs ensure that all local data storage is encrypted according to policy. Any access to data across a network by the application logic is via framework network APIs. These APIs ensure, with the cooperation of the gateway, that all data access across the network is authorized by policy and secured/encrypted according to policy.
In some embodiments, the capabilities of the computation endpoint require that access to certain aspects of the computation endpoint be routed via framework APIs (e.g., access to a BlueTooth or data card interface). In other embodiments, the capabilities of the operating system on the computation endpoint require that access to any inter-application communication facilities be routed through framework APIs. In general, where the leakage of data is possible, or where the injection of data is possible, the framework APIs must be used so that the framework can enforce policies around data security.
The framework also includes utility APIs to enable diagnosis and remote troubleshooting.
These APIs include logging, event, counter and gauge facilities, as well as instrumented state machine mechanisms. When application logic is implemented in a way that uses these APIs, much of the execution history and application state is exposed to the framework. The framework is in turn able to make this information available for remote troubleshooting as well as data collection.
The Application Distribution System
The application distribution system accepts instances of application logic 2131, validates 3242 them and distributes them in a network of marketplaces. A marketplace 2333 that distributes executable applications to computation endpoints is a leaf marketplace 33. Whenever an instance of application logic is introduced into the application distribution system, it is submitted to a marketplace, as in step 702 of
In some embodiments, in cases of ambiguity, the marketplace static analysis unit rejects the submitted application logic. In some embodiments, a marketplace accepts instances of application logic from other marketplaces as well as from developers. In this case, IT personnel perform a curation function 35, as in step 704 of
In some embodiments, a marketplace is required to log and transmit information related to the transfer of instances of application logic to a billing system, as in stop 705. In embodiments with a leaf marketplace, the leaf marketplace is also required to log information related to the downloading of applications to computation endpoints. In some versions of the invention, such information is also transferred to a billing system.
A marketplace has a user interface where users can browse available applications and request application downloads. In some embodiments, a marketplace is required to authenticate users, as in step 707, before users are allowed access to the marketplace, or at the point of application download, or neither, or both. In some embodiments, a policy determines which apps a given user sees as available. Embodiments of the user interface include a web-interface, a mobile application, or other computer-human interface.
When an app is to be made available for download, the marketplace's binding unit 42 converts the instance of application logic into an executable application 43, as in step 706. The binding unit completes any necessary compilation, assembly, configuration, linking or other operation required to transform the instance of application logic into an executable application, as in steps 722, 724. In some embodiments, depending on policy and the target OS of the computation endpoint, the framework is combined, as in steps 722, 724 with the instance of application logic by the binder, or possibly at an earlier stage in the path from development of the instance of application logic to the final binding of the application for download. If dictated by policy, the binding unit generates the device-binding token, the user-binding token or both. Any required binding tokens are built into the application, as in steps 722, 724 prior to download.
In some embodiments, depending on policy, the application logic, and the deployment scenario, data access addresses is rewritten by the binding unit, as in steps 726, 728. For example, policy can dictate that an application communicate with one set of servers when launched by employees working in the finance department, and an entirely different set of servers when launched by other employees. In such cases, the binding unit fixes the data access addresses differently depending on the employee's group designation. The example given is for illustrative purposes; the data binding capability of the binding unit is total—any address in the data access namespace can be rewritten.
The Gateway
The gateway 51 is coupled between an application running on a computation endpoint 52 and data servers or data services 53 accessible by the application. The gateway ensures that the running of the application and the accesses by applications to data conforms are policy conformant, as in steps 404 of
As described, the framework 54 communicates with the authentication unit 55 in the gateway 51. The authentication unit 55 implements the required authentication protocols, interworking between the framework 54 embedded in the application and configured authentication servers and services 56.
The authorization unit/PEP (Policy Enforcement Point) 57 receives requests from the authentication unit 55 to ensure that a user/computation endpoint is entitled to run any given application. The authorization unit/PEP 57 also receives requests from the data interface unit 58 to ensure that data accesses performed on behalf of an application are permitted by policy. In some embodiments, the authorization unit/PEP 57 makes a request to external authorization servers or services 56, including PDPs (Policy Decision Points). In other embodiments, the gateway has an on-board PDP 59, and also exports an interface for the authoring and maintenance of policy/PAP (Policy Administration Point) 510. In such a case, the on-board PAP maintains a policy database 511, which is referenced by the on-board PDP 59.
The authorization unit 57 also has access to per-application instance key material 512. Upon satisfying all authentication requirements, as in step 752 of
When attempting to access data behind the gateway, as in step 652, the application logic 513 calls the framework APIs 54, which in tum attempt the access via the gateway 51. Such accesses are routed to the data interface unit 58, as in step 654. In some embodiments, if any additional translation of data access addresses is required, the data interface unit resolves final addresses prior to checking policy. After the data interface unit 58 has confirmed via the authorization unit 57 that access is permitted by policy, as in step 656, the request is forwarded to the bus 514, as in step 658.
In some embodiments, the bus 514 handles pendant and non-pendant access requests. For non-pendant requests, the gateway 51 retains sufficient state to appropriately handle the response.
The bus 514 maps the request, based on the address of the data, as in step 660, to the appropriate back-end protocol implementation 515. The bus 514 maintains a mapping function, and presents a user interface for administration of the underlying mapping data. In some embodiments, the underlying mapping data is administered programmatically by an external entity.
Back-end protocol implementations 515 accept requests from the bus 514 and proxy requests into the protocol supported by the specific back-end. In this way, the gateway is extensible to additional data access protocols by adding additional backend protocol implementation modules 515.
The service unit 516 provides a user interface and a programmatic interface 518 for the troubleshooting of remote applications. The troubleshooter, after being authenticated, can access the state of a currently running application. The degree of access to application state depends of the degree to which the application logic made use of the framework utility APIs.
The metrics unit 517 captures execution data from the gateway, and also execution data from applications serviced by the gateway. The metrics unit presents a user interface and a programmatic interface where policy as to which data is to be kept is maintained 519. The metrics unit can be embodied such that this policy is stored internally or outside the gateway. The metrics unit can be configured to store data inside the gateway, or to push data to external storage for off-board analysis 519. The metrics unit offers a user interface and a programmatic interface for generating and downloading reports 519.
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/226,351, filed Sep. 6, 2011 and titled “SYSTEM FOR THE DISTRIBUTION AND DEPLOYMENT OF APPLICATIONS WITH PROVISIONS FOR SECURITY AND POLICY CONFORMANCE”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/402,934, filed on Sep. 7, 2010 and titled “A SYSTEM FOR THE DISTRIBUTION AND DEPLOYMENT OF APPLICATIONS, WITH PROVISIONS FOR SECURITY AND POLICY CONFORMANCE”, which application in its entirety is incorporated by reference into the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5138712 | Corbin et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5737416 | Cooper et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5825883 | Archibald | Oct 1998 | A |
6005935 | Civanlar | Dec 1999 | A |
6035403 | Subbiah et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6134593 | Alexander et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134659 | Sprong et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6243468 | Pearce et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260141 | Park | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6460140 | Schoch et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6615191 | Seeley | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6801999 | Venkatesan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7134016 | Harris | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7823192 | Fultz | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7949998 | Bleisch et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20010011254 | Clark | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039625 | Ananda | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044780 | Miyazaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044782 | Hughes et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051928 | Brody | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020073316 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087883 | Wohlgemuth et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030135756 | Verma | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177351 | Skingle | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191823 | Bansal et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040107368 | Colvin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123122 | Asai | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148525 | Aida et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167859 | Mirabella | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168061 | Kostal et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199766 | Chew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202324 | Yamaguchi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267645 | Pollari | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005098 | Michaelis et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021992 | Aida et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050049970 | Sato et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091511 | Nave et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097348 | Jakubowski et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050222958 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060026690 | Yu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060069926 | Ginter et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060123412 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070100701 | Boccon-Gibod | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157310 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174424 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070186112 | Perlin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070287471 | Wood | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080072297 | Lu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082446 | Hicks | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080134347 | Goyal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148363 | Gilder et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080267406 | Asokan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090055749 | Chatterjee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063867 | Granados | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077637 | Santos et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090119218 | Ooki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090217367 | Norman et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090327091 | Hartin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050251 | Speyer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100192234 | Sugimoto et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100228870 | Terry | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281537 | Wang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293103 | Nikitin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299376 | Batchu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306668 | Williams, III et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110138174 | Aciicmez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120137281 | Kleiner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Grier et al., Secure web browsing with the OP web browser, 2008, IEEE. |
Pfeiffer et al., Accessibility for the HTML5 <video> element, 2009, ACM. |
Bartoletti et al., Jalapa: Securing Java with Local Policies, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61402934 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13226351 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14450179 | US |