This invention relates generally to voltage detection systems and more specifically to voltage detection systems using amplitude modulation techniques.
Prior to performing work on electrical installation/equipment, workers are required to verify that the equipment is in an electrically safe state. Until proven otherwise, one must assume that the equipment is energized and take all necessary precautions, including utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). One part of the verification of an electrically safe work condition involves a test for the absence of voltage. This test is performed by a trained and qualified electrician using an adequately rated voltage tester, usually a portable voltmeter or multi-meter. The electrician first tests his meter on a known, energized source to ensure it is working properly. He/she then verifies that voltage is absent in the electrical equipment by metering phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground. Finally, he re-tests his meter on a known, energized source to ensure it is still functioning properly and wasn't damaged during the test. Although voltage verification is an NFPA 70E requirement and considered a best practice, the test itself still presents a hazard because workers are exposed to energized circuits and conductors when using the voltage tester during the live portions of the test.
A permanent installed device that is able to detect the presence and verify the absence of primary (single- or multi-phase AC or DC) voltage and positively indicate the status of voltage in a particular electrical compartment would be useful for this type of application.
One of the key steps to verifying the absence of a signal is to perform a check to verify that the device/tester can detect a known voltage unit (test the tester). One other step is to verifying the unit is actually measuring the signal and has not unknowingly been disconnected (connectivity test).
A system for the verification of the absence of voltage includes a first impedance, an amplitude limiter electrically connected to the first impedance, a second impedance electrically connected to the first impedance and the amplitude limiter, a varactor circuit electrically connected to the second impedance, an isolation capacitor electrically connected to the second impedance and varactor circuit, an envelope circuit with a voltage detection circuit connected to the isolation circuit via a buffer, and an RF oscillator. The amplitude limiter configured to limit the voltage applied to the varactor circuit. The RF oscillator configured to interact with the varactor circuit in order to create a modulated circuit for the buffer and envelope circuit. The envelope circuit is configured to demodulate the signal for the voltage detection circuit.
The amplitude limiter 104 limits the amplitude of the signal that will be applied to the varactor circuit 107.
The varactor circuit 107 includes two opposing varactor diodes 108. Varactor diodes act as voltage controlled capacitors whose capacitance increases as the reverse voltage applied across the varactor diode decreases. As a result, as the reverse voltage decreases so does the impendence path for the RF oscillator circuit 112. Thus, since the resistor of the oscillator 113 circuit remains constant (and since a voltage divider is created between the resistor 113 and varactor circuit 107), a modulated signal is created for the envelope detection circuit 115 which reflects the voltage applied across the varactor circuit 107.
The envelope detection circuit 115 acts as a demodulator with an output that is dependent upon the detected voltage of the system 10. By monitoring the output voltage of the envelope detection circuit 115, and by knowing a base or calibration magnitude, one can then determine whether voltage is present from the power signal.
The isolation capacitor 110 isolates the RF oscillator circuit 112 and the envelope detection circuit 115 from low frequency and DC signals from the amplitude limiter 104 and varactor circuit 107.
The sensitivity of such a system can be optimized around a specific voltage level (such as zero volts) as shown in
Absence of voltage indicators may need to perform various tests to help indicate that the device is functioning properly. These tests may be performed automatically or manually (initiated by a user).
Another test can involve testing for continuity between the power line 101 and the rest of the system.
The above systems can be applied with a three phase power line as shown in
In order to meet some fault tolerant requirements and to provide a high degree of confidence in function of the devise, the functions of the system can be split into two independent branch circuits. One is to perform voltage detection function and the other one is for testing the system functionality by presenting various states and monitoring that the voltage-detection branch circuits are functioning as intended. The various states can include a connectivity test on each phase, voltage testability of the device on each phase, and other self-test functions
While particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as described.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/051344 | 9/22/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/048954 | 3/31/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3141128 | Behr | Jul 1964 | A |
3496453 | Swain | Feb 1970 | A |
3536997 | Holt | Oct 1970 | A |
3737765 | Lee et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3810003 | Portoulas | May 1974 | A |
3863208 | Balban | Jan 1975 | A |
3914757 | Finlay, Jr. | Oct 1975 | A |
4193026 | Finger | Mar 1980 | A |
4489278 | Sawazaki | Dec 1984 | A |
4870343 | Dooley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5245275 | Germer et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5285163 | Liotta | Feb 1994 | A |
5353014 | Carroll et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5600524 | Neiger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5715125 | Neiger et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5814997 | Bouchez | Sep 1998 | A |
5867019 | Malenko et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874895 | Devamey | Feb 1999 | A |
5986557 | Clarke | Nov 1999 | A |
6075448 | Verkhovskiy | Jun 2000 | A |
6100679 | McCasland | Aug 2000 | A |
6111733 | Neiger et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6157184 | Atherton | Dec 2000 | A |
6313642 | Brooks | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6703938 | Clarke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6988061 | Gray et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7154281 | Piesinger | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7268558 | Mills et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7319315 | Martin | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20070108992 | Yanagisawa | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10140855 | Mar 2003 | DE |
2597210 | Oct 1987 | FR |
H02214892 | Aug 1990 | JP |
H0651001 | Feb 1994 | JP |
H0977409 | Oct 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170269129 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62053420 | Sep 2014 | US |