Patent Grant
9199594
The present invention relates to energy and impact absorption system used in a vehicle, more particularly relates to an under run protection device used in vehicles to absorb impact and energy generated in an event.
Use of under-run protection devices as an impact absorption apparatus is well known and well received in the field of body and chassis construction for trucks as a safety apparatus. They play an important role when a truck and a light motor vehicle are involved in a crash.
The ride height of a heavy vehicle is higher compared to a light motor vehicle (LMV), therefore, when involved in a crash with each other, the LMV under-runs the heavy vehicle, making the crash a high impact and fatal. The effect of light vehicle under running a heavy vehicle can be two fold.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,399,015 issued to Patel, et al. discloses a tube like structure along with a plate that would protect in case of a crash. However, the new regulation introduced do not allow for tubular structures for under-run protection, due to the ineffectiveness in case of greater impact crash. The new regulation therefore mandates the face or the surface that is exposed to a vehicle involved in an accident as to be flat. Thus, making the granted patent obsolete for use under present regulations.
Though the prior arts in the field meet the standards set by various regulating bodies around the world there is a need to reduce the amount of material being used to manufacture the under-run protection devices (UPD) without changing impact absorbing capacity.
The principal objective of the present invention is to provide an improved energy absorbing structure for heavy vehicles.
Another objective of the invention is to simplify the manufacturing process for an improved energy absorbing structure by reducing the complexity of the component design using an automated designing method wherein only three inputs value help compute all the desired set of dimensions.
Yet another objective of the invention is to provide an improved energy absorbing structure for heavy vehicles with reduced weight and manufacturing method that enables to achieve reduction in weight.
Before the present methods and apparatuses are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular apparatus and methodologies described for an under-run protection device, as there can be multiple possible embodiments of the under run protection device, which are not expressly illustrated, in the present disclosure. It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the under-run protection device, which will be limited only by the appended claims.
In the highly competitive market of commercial vehicles, for an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to be profitable, the pricing of product should be very competitive. One such product addressed in the present application is the Under-run Protection Device used in vehicles.
In one aspect, a cost effective Under-run Protection Device is designed, contributing the product to be competitive.
The another aspect of the present disclosure, a novel under-run protection device is disclosed, the simple design of the under-run protection device gives a noteworthy cost savings due to manufacturing and weight reduction. The under-run protection device for a vehicle, comprises a first beam member (100) extending in a lateral direction of the vehicle comprising at least two distinguishable portions (110, 120), positioned adjacent to each other, wherein the first portion (110) has a corrugated cross-section and the second portion (120) has a “C” cross-section. A second beam member (210) is mounted on the first beam member (100), extending in the lateral direction is adapted to absorb an impact from another vehicle. Further a plurality of L-shape brackets (300) are mounted on the first beam (100), connecting the said first beam member (100) with the vehicle.
In another aspect of the invention, a system is provided comprising an energy absorbing structure with reduced weight. The energy absorbing structure with reduced weight for a vehicle comprises a first beam (405) member extending laterally to the direction of the vehicle, wherein a partial portion (420, 435) of the first beam has a corrugated cross-section. A second beam member (415) is mounted on the first beam member positioned and adapted to absorb an impact from another vehicle by deforming when the impact force exceeds a predetermined level, further the partial corrugated cross-section (420, 435) of the first beam member (405) enables reduction in construction/manufacturing material for the said second beam member. A plurality of brackets (440) characterized by a L-shape, are joined to the first beam member (405) at one arm of the L-shape and with the vehicle at other arm of the L-shape.
In another aspect of the invention, an energy-absorbing under-run protection system is provided, that minimizes the damage and improves the safety of vehicle occupants in a collision where a heavy vehicle and light motor vehicle are involved. The energy-absorbing under-run protection device is characterized by a partial corrugated first beam comprising: a second beam mounted on the first beam, wherein the said second beam is adapted to deform when an impact force exerted by another vehicle exceeds a predefined value; and a plurality of L-shape brackets are mounted in the trough of the corrugated first beam at one arm of the L-shape.
Yet in another aspect of the invention, a method for manufacturing an improved energy absorbing structure, having a set of dimensions computed based in inputs of only three values is disclosed. The set of dimensions are computed automatically without any trial and error approach. The set of dimension computed confer to standard requirement of various governing bodies. The use of said method reduces the cost of development for an under-run protection device and enables fast re-designing of the UPD as per requirement.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings example constructions of the invention; however, the invention is not limited to the specific methods and product disclosed in the drawings:
Some embodiments of this invention, illustrating its features, will now be discussed:
The words “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” and “including,” and other forms thereof, are intended to be equivalent in meaning and be open ended in that an item or items following any one of these words is not meant to be an exhaustive listing of such item or items, or meant to be limited to only the listed item or items.
It must also be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Although any systems, methods, apparatuses, and devices similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the present invention, the preferred, systems and parts are now described.
The disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which may be embodied in various forms.
Definitions of the Terms:
The term vehicle refers to at least one element that can be selected from the group comprising of motor vehicle, automobile, personal transport vehicle, Automated guided vehicle, or self-propelled machines.
The terms “system,” “systems,” “components” or “parts” refers to a common term “systems” and essentially mean the same.
The terms “smart energy absorbing system (SEAS),” “under-run protection device,” energy absorbing structure,” or “(UPD),” refers to a common term “under-run protection device” and essentially mean the same.
The
In another embodiment of the present invention, the second beam (210) comprises a plurality of trough and a plurality of crest extending laterally over the entire length of the second beam (210).
The
According to another embodiment, the corrugated cross section extends the entire length of the first member with the plurality of crests and the plurality of troughs having uniform size.
According to another embodiment, the corrugated cross section extends to a predefined length with varying sizes of crest and trough. For example, as illustrated in the
According to an embodiment, the under-run protection device (400) wherein the plurality of L-shape bracket (440) is welded in the plurality of trough on a side facing the vehicle (410).
The present disclosure would be appreciated best by a person skilled in the art when read in conjugation with the following experimental data performed using a standard procedure as required by various regulating bodies:
The
When a load or force is applied to the setup model at point P1, the results were captured in the form of a graph shown as
It was observed from
When the load or force was applied at the location “P2” to the claimed invention and conventional design it was observed that the claimed invention achieved a 10% overload at 110 kN compared to the conventional design at the same load, this is represented in
The Table B, illustrated below shows the economical advantage of using the system and apparatus disclosed in the present application.
According to the present embodiment, a maximum allowable weight (803) for the vehicle would depend on the weight of the vehicle (801). The process further comprises step of computing and displaying the permissible weight or load or force acting at positions “P1,” and “P3”. When the permissible force that can be exerted on location “P1” and “P3” exceeds 25 kilo Newton (kN) then only 25 kN is rendered (807) and when it's below 25 kN then the actual permissible force is rendered (810). For position “P2” when permissible force exceeds 100 kilo Newton (kN) then only 100 kN is rendered (814) and when its below 100 kN then the actual permissible force is rendered (813). According to an embodiment “P1” and “P3” are computed as 12.5% of the maximum allowable weight (803) and “P2” is computed as 50% of the maximum allowable weight (803). The flow chart illustrating the designing on the under-run protection device further comprises of rendering the target load as per the regulation (815) of various governing bodies and predicted load (816).
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4221413 | Bonnetain | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4329824 | Lowe | May 1982 | A |
| 4409771 | Lowe | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4468052 | Koike | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4966378 | Cook | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5252002 | Day | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5632518 | Kendall | May 1997 | A |
| 6089629 | Hope et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6179355 | Chou et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6390438 | McManus | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398275 | Hartel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6435579 | Glance | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6652010 | Huddle et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6712411 | Gotanda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6764118 | DePottey et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 7284788 | Barbat et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7399015 | Patel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7950705 | Saitou | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8308207 | Fang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 20020149214 | Evans | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20060119116 | Goertz | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20080012364 | Boggess | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080185851 | Evans et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20100109353 | Allen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20130113226 | Bobba et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Vicroads,“Review of Truck Safety: Stage 1: Frontal, Side and Rear Underrun Protection”, Monash University Accident Research Centre, Australia, Apr. 2002. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150076846 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
