The present invention relates generally to systems, methods and computer programs to select digital information, such as advertisements, tags or links to deliver to individuals' communications devices.
Peer-to-peer and peer-to-group communications, such as Short Message Service (SMS), Multimedia Message Service (MMS), EMS (Enhanced Message Service), e-mail and Instant Messaging (IM), are being used more frequently as a mechanism for delivering advertisements. The term “tagging” is generally used when describing this type of advertising, i.e., a tag is an advertisement which is delivered to users' communication devices using any of the foregoing techniques. The term Tag refers to information added by a service operator, such as MVNO (mobile virtual network operator), MNO (mobile network operator), other 3rd party or a sender (e.g. using a suitable application in a sending device to a peer-to-peer, peer-to-group, service-to-peer or service-to-group digital message). The information contained within the Tag could be at least one of the following: part of a an advertisement campaign, a service acquisition message, and information services (news stories, weather, ‘What's On’, etc.), or any other content.
In particular, the SMS is a universal standard that allows the users of cellular telephones, cable telephones, or other communication devices which support it, to send and receive messages with a text content that can comprise a predetermined maximum number of alphanumerical characters.
In the alphabetical coding system of the European standard GSM, the maximum number of characters is 160, in the Cyrillic standard the maximun number of characters is 140, and with the UCS2 (Turkish, Greek, Arab, Chinese, Thai, etc.) standard the maximun number of characters is 70.
The evolution of SMS has led to EMS, for incorporating in a SMS text message graphics, images, animations and/or sounds.
In this context SMART MESSAGE (SM) is also used, which is a standard developed by Nokia Corporation and universally recognized. SM enables the addition graphical, audio and video content to normal SMS text messages.
Both the SMART MESSAGE and the EMS standards are made linking several SMS to one another.
A Flash Message, also called SMS of class 0, is a special text message, improved from the SMS message. Its content is displayed directly on the display of the mobile phone.
The MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service) is a universal standard that enables the users of mobile phones and other communication devices that support it to send and receive messages with content of text, images, graphics, sounds, audio clips and/or video clips. The structure of the MMS consists of one or more pages or “slides”, each containing two regions, one for the text and one for the images. The pages, furthermore, can be timed, and sound can be appended, and they can be displayed. Each page, or slide, has the same layout. The MMS is therefore an extension of the concept of SMS, are MMS messages are typically called multimedia messages.
Concerning SMS, the cost of the messages is typically independent of the length of the text being sent, which only seldom achieves the maximum allowed. Therefore, the user incurs the same cost for a single word as for a long text within the limits. The same applies for a Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO), i.e. MVNO typically pays to Mobile Network Operator (MNO) the same fee per message independent of the length of the text as delivered for MVNO's client. To clarify, a MVNO is a company that provides mobile (sometimes called wireless or cellular) telephone service but does not have its own allocation of the radio frequency spectrum nor all of the infrastructure required to provide mobile telephone service.
The same occurs for other types of the above cited messages, EMS, SMART MESSAGE and MMS, where the cost of the sent message is typically fixed, or calculated for blocks of fixed length, or calculated as packages of delivered data. Therefore, except for rare cases, a residual space not exploited by the user is always present.
The use of unused space within digital communications for advertising use creates a substantial inventory of available (that is, unused) tag space and thus requires a substantial inventory of tags to be used to fill these available tag spaces. Efficient use of this tag inventory with a varied supply of commercially viable tags can be problematic. For SMS tags alone, it is estimated that for every 100,000 mobile users, there are more than 2,000,000 tag spaces available every month. Accordingly, it is a primary concern of mobile operators and advertisers to deliver tags to the users of the service that are relevant, engaging and timely.
To this end, “House Ads” are frequently used by mobile operators and are a set of advertisements that promote the mobile operator itself. However, the mobile operator is then unable to directly obtain revenue from the advertisements, tags, links as would occur if a party other than the mobile operator were utilizing this unused available space.
The present invention enables selection of information such as advertisements, tags, and links to deliver to individuals' communication devices by determining relevant and/or recent url links that may be used as tags when tagging a message, such as SMS or MMS message, being delivered to each user's communication device. The search for relevant and/or recent links is tailored to the users who are sending/receiving the message and is designed to consider several factors including, but not limited to, profile information concerning either the recipient of the communication or, when no information is known about the recipient, the sender of the communication, any commercial relationship between the mobile operator and mobile internet service providers, suitability of a site to mobile internet access generally or based on device capability or rate agreement of sender or receiver of the message and the current popularity of a mobile internet site (for instance, an information provider while a major news story is breaking).
The invention, together with further objects and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals identify like elements, and wherein:
Referring to the accompanying drawings wherein the same reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements,
The first step 10 is for a user to create and send a digital communication, e.g., a message such as a SMS message, to another user's communication device. Then, this communication is analyzed to determine whether it can be modified to include a tag, or otherwise have a tag associated therewith 12. The analysis of the digital communication to determine whether the message can be modified to include additional information such as advertisements, tags or links and how the modification can be implemented is disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 10/555,543 entitled Messaging System and Service which was filed on Mar. 6, 2006, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. If not, then the communication is delivered to the user's device without modification 14, i.e., without an associated tag. However, if the message is determined to allow for inclusion or insertion of a tag, then a determination is made as to whether there is a tag in the inventory of tags 16, e.g., tags from advertisers who have paid to have tags delivered to individuals. This stage is performed by communicating with a database containing tag booking data 18. If there is an available and relevant tag, then one of the tags from the inventory is placed within the communication 20 and the communication is delivered to the individual's communication device 14. Selection of a particular tag to place within the communication may be based on the profile of the individual, the content of the communication, and other known parameters for targeting advertisements to individuals.
If there are no tags in the inventory, which is usually indicative of insufficient tags having been received for the allocatable spaces for the individuals for a given period of time, then a tag feed function is invoked to search for one or more links to include within or otherwise associate with the communication 22. In one embodiment of the invention, even if a tag is selected from an inventory of tags, this tag may be agreed to with an advertiser to be a tag wherein factual content is selected by doing a search according to the invention from the advertiser's web page or from other sources agreed to with the advertiser. This embodiment enables dynamic tags with factual content which is decided upon (selected) just before adding the tag. The search may be performed based on, for example, profile information available concerning the recipient of the communication (possibly contained in one or more user profile databases 24), profile information concerning the sender of the communication, especially if no information (no profile data) is available concerning the recipient but such profile information exists concerning the sender (also possibly contained in database 24), any commercial relationship between the mobile operator managing the individual's communication device and a mobile internet service provider possibly contained in a preferred partner database 26, suitability of a site to mobile internet access generally or based on device capability or rate agreement of the sender or receiver of the message, and the current popularity of a mobile internet site, possibly determined from an internet site index 28. A determination is made as to whether a relevant information to be included in the message has been found 30. Once a relevant information such as an advertisement, link or tag has been found it is inserted within the communication to fill the tag space fully or partly and the communication is delivered 14. It should be noted that a tag is not always something that can be found as such, but it corresponds, for example, to a relevant website, (e.g. a web page having a news about a celebrity buying a new dog). Thereafter a tag is created by creating a link to the site with short description of the link/site. It should also be noted that the length of tag, (i.e. number of characters used for a link and to describe it) is defined based on number of space left in a message (i.e. number of unused space in the message). This size can be used as one selection criteria when selecting a link for tagging (if there is limited amount of characters left then sites with short link to it may be preferred
User profile information may be generated from, for example, preferences (information, likes/dislikes and interests) provided by the user, information regarding purchases made by the user when using the communication system, internet searches conducted when using the communication system, subjects of and information conveyed when sending text messages and emails when using the communication system, and previous advertisements, tags, and/or messages sent from the communication service provider that the user has/has not responded to, among others.
Examples of the manner in which the system and method in accordance with the invention identify and place tags into available tag spaces are as follows:
User A of a mobile communications device sends an SMS to user B of a mobile communications device with the text “Going out tonight?”. The SMS satisfies conditions that allow a tag to be placed within the message prior to delivery and one is sought from the tag inventory. However, all inventory has been exhausted, i.e., there are no more tags to place within the message, or there are no more relevant tags, i.e., although there are still tags in the tag inventory, none of them are deemed relevant to mobile User B. The tagging service recognizes this and invokes a tag feed function. A search is then made on available internet sites, e.g., mobile internet sites, initially attempting to use profiling information known about the intended recipient of the message (User B). However, in this particular example, no profile information is known so a search is then made of the profile information known about the sender (User A), which information exists. The profile information about User A may be stored in one or more databases managed by the mobile service provider and accessed by the server which includes the computer program which performs the search, e.g., user profile database 24.
Profiling information about User A, from user profile database 24, indicates that the user is an avid sports fan with a history of specific interest in the Manchester United soccer club. A mobile internet search is made based upon this information. The search results identify over 200 references, e.g., links, that may be used. However, one result that is particularly popular is a link to an internet site having a breaking news story that a new player is about to sign with the club (this information being available in the internet site index 28). Coincidentally, the company that runs this particular mobile internet site has a commercial relationship with the mobile operator (of the communications network being used by mobile user B) whereby content sold to their users is subject to a revenue sharing agreement (this relationship being stored in the preferred partner database 26). These factors are therefore considered by the searching program, i.e., the popularity of the site and the commercial relationship, when deciding which result to insert into the message being delivered to mobile user B. As a result of these considerations the search engine determines that the link to this site is to be used to fill the tag space at least partly, and then proceeds to enable delivery of the SMS message from User A to User B with this link.
With reference to the foregoing example, it is foreseen that in one embodiment the internet search is performed only from sites that have a commercial relationship with the service provider (e.g. mobile operator).
With reference to
A computer program may be arranged to perform all of the steps shown in
This computer program may be resident on computer-readable media. Computer-readable medium could be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate or transmit a program for use by or in connection with the method, system, apparatus or device. The computer-readable medium can be, but is not limited to (not an exhaustive list), electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semi-conductor propagation medium. The medium can also be (not an exhaustive list) an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable, programmable, read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, and a portable compact disk read-only memory (CDROM). The medium can also be paper or other suitable medium upon which a program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via for example, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory. Also, a computer program or data may be transferred to another computer-readable medium by any suitable process such as by scanning the computer-readable medium.
Having described exemplary embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, it will be appreciated that the present invention is not limited to those embodiments, and that various changes and modifications can be effected therein by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0803273.2 | Feb 2008 | GB | national |
This application claims priority under 35 USC 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/999,004 filed Oct. 15, 2007, and U.K. Patent Application GB 0803273.2 filed Feb. 25, 2008, the entire disclosure of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5408519 | Pierce et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5459306 | Stein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5600364 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613213 | Naddell et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5678179 | Turcotte et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5978775 | Chen | Nov 1999 | A |
5978833 | Pashley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006197 | d'Eon et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009410 | LeMole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023700 | Owens et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055512 | Dean et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055513 | Katz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057872 | Candelore | May 2000 | A |
6097942 | Laiho | Aug 2000 | A |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286005 | Cannon | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6334145 | Adams et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338044 | Cook et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345279 | Li et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6381465 | Chern et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393407 | Middleton, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405243 | Nielsen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408309 | Agarwal | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6446261 | Rosser | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6502076 | Smith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6684249 | Frerichs et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690394 | Harui | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718551 | Swix et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738978 | Hendricks et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6795808 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6886000 | Aggarwal et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6920326 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6990462 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7039599 | Merriman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072947 | Knox et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7149537 | Kupsh et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7168084 | Hendricks et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7203684 | Carobus et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7280818 | Clayton | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7356477 | Allan et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370002 | Heckerman et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7539652 | Flinn et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7558559 | Alston | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7669212 | Alao et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685019 | Collins | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7730017 | Nance et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734632 | Wang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747676 | Nayfeh et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7870576 | Eldering | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882518 | Finseth et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7903099 | Baluja | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912843 | Murdock et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7984014 | Song et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8046797 | Bentolila et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8060406 | Blegen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8191098 | Cooper et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8229786 | Cetin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8380562 | Toebes et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20010044739 | Bensemana | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047272 | Frietas et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051925 | Kang | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006803 | Mendiola et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016736 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019829 | Shapiro | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020021809 | Salo et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052781 | Aufricht et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075305 | Beaton et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077130 | Owensby | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078147 | Bouthors et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083411 | Bouthors et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099842 | Jennings et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120498 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020137507 | Winkler | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138291 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161770 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164977 | Link, II et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165773 | Natsumo et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175935 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003935 | Vesikivi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023489 | McGuire et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040297 | Pecen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040300 | Bodic et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030083931 | Lang | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101454 | Ozer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126015 | Chan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126146 | Var Der Riet | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130887 | Nathaniel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154300 | Mostafa | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182567 | Barton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188017 | Nomura | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191689 | Bosarge et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197719 | Lincke et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003398 | Donian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040043777 | Brouwer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040045029 | Matsuura | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054576 | Kanerva et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068435 | Braunzell | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133480 | Domes | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136358 | Hind et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158858 | Paxton et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040185883 | Rukman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040192359 | McRaild et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203761 | Baba et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203851 | Vetro et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204133 | Andrew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040209649 | Lord | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240649 | Goel | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259526 | Goris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010641 | Staack | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021397 | Cui et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060425 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071224 | Fikes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075929 | Wolinsky et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125397 | Gross et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138140 | Wen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050228680 | Malik | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228797 | Koningstein et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229209 | Hildebolt et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239495 | Bayne | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239504 | Ishii et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249216 | Jones | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267798 | Panara | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273465 | Kimura | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273833 | Soinio | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289113 | Bookstaff | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031327 | Kredo | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040642 | Boris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060048059 | Etkin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059133 | Moritani | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068845 | Muller et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060075425 | Koch et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095511 | Munarriz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117378 | Tam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123014 | Ng | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129455 | Shah | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060141923 | Goss | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161520 | Brewer et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167747 | Goodman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168616 | Candelore | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060194595 | Myllynen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200460 | Meyerzon et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200461 | Lucas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206586 | Ling et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060276170 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276213 | Gottschalk et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282319 | Maggio | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282328 | Gerace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286963 | Koskinen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286964 | Polanski et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288124 | Kraft et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004333 | Kavanti | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011344 | Paka et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016743 | Jevans | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022021 | Walker et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027703 | Hu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027760 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070027762 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070037562 | Smith-Kerker et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047523 | Jiang | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061195 | Liu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061300 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067215 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072631 | Mock et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074262 | Kikkoji et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078712 | Ott et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083602 | Heggenhougen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088687 | Bromm et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088801 | Levkovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088851 | Levkovitz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094066 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100651 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100805 | Ramer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070105536 | Tingo, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113243 | Brey | May 2007 | A1 |
20070117571 | Musial | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118592 | Bachenberg | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136457 | Dai et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149208 | Syrbe et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156534 | Lerner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180147 | Leigh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192409 | Kleinstern et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198485 | Ramer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208619 | Branam et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214470 | Glasgow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233671 | Oztekin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244750 | Grannan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260624 | Chung et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288950 | Downey et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290787 | Fiatal et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004046 | Mumick et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004958 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013537 | Dewey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032703 | Krumm et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080032717 | Sawada et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040175 | Dellovo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052158 | Ferro et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065491 | Bakman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070579 | Kankar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071875 | Koff et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071929 | Motte et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082686 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091796 | Story | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080133344 | Hyder et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140508 | Anand et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080228568 | Williams et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243619 | Sharman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249832 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262927 | Kanayama et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271068 | Ou et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281606 | Kitts et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288476 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319836 | Aaltonen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006194 | Sridharan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029721 | Doraswamy | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049090 | Shenfield et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063249 | Tomlin et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106111 | Walk et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125377 | Somji et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132395 | Lam et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138304 | Aharoni et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090197619 | Colligan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216847 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240677 | Parekh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090275315 | Alston | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090286520 | Nielsen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090298483 | Bratu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030647 | Shahshahani | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100082397 | Blegen | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082423 | Nag et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088152 | Bennett | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114654 | Lukose et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125505 | Puttaswamy | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138271 | Henkin | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153216 | Liang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161424 | Sylvain | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169157 | Muhonen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169176 | Turakhia | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110106840 | Barrett et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110209067 | Bogess et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110276401 | Knowles et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1015704 | Jul 2005 | BE |
199 41 461 | Mar 2001 | DE |
10061984 | Jun 2002 | DE |
1061465 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 073 293 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 109 371 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1107137 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1109371 | Jun 2001 | EP |
2 369 218 | May 2002 | EP |
1 220 132 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 239 392 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1280087 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 365 604 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 408 705 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1 455 511 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1509024 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1528827 | May 2005 | EP |
1 542 482 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1 587 332 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1 615 455 | Jan 2006 | EP |
1 633 100 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 677 475 | Jul 2006 | EP |
1772822 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2343051 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2372867 | Sep 2002 | GB |
2 406 996 | Apr 2005 | GB |
2406996 | Apr 2005 | GB |
2 414 621 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2414621 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2424546 | Sep 2006 | GB |
2002-140272 | May 2002 | JP |
2007-087138 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007087138 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-199821 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007199821 | Aug 2007 | JP |
20060011760 | Jul 2004 | KR |
WO 9624213 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9821713 | May 1998 | WO |
0000916 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0030002 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0044151 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0122748 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0122748 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0131497 | May 2001 | WO |
0144977 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0152161 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0163423 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0157705 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0158178 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0165411 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0169406 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0171949 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0172063 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0191400 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0193551 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0197539 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0209431 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0231624 | Apr 2002 | WO |
0244989 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02054803 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02054803 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02069585 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02069651 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 02075574 | Sep 2002 | WO |
02086664 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02084895 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02096056 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03015430 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03019845 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03024136 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03049461 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03088690 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004084532 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004086791 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004100470 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004100470 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004100470 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004100521 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102993 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004104867 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005020578 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005029769 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005073863 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076650 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006005001 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006002869 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006005001 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006016189 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006024003 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006027407 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006040749 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006093284 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006119481 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007001118 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007002025 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007060451 | May 2007 | WO |
2007091089 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007103263 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008013437 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008024852 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008045867 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008045867 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008147919 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2008147919 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009009507 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009032856 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009061914 | May 2009 | WO |
2009077888 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009099876 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009158097 | Dec 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Definition of “user” at the Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing, Denis Howe 2010. |
definition of “message” at Random house Dictionary, Random House 2011. |
definition of “relevant”, World English Dictionary (1998). |
definition of “dynamic”, SCience Dictionary (2002). |
Search Report under Section 17 dated Jul. 7, 2008 in related U.K. Application GB 0803273.2. |
Examination Report dated Jun. 17, 2009 issued in counterpart U.K. Application No. GB0803273.2 by the U.K. Intellectual Property Office (4 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Feb. 11, 2009, issued by the International Searching Authority in related International Application PCT/EP2008/063839 (11 pages). |
“Advertisement System, Method and Computer Program Product”, IP.com Prior Art Database Disclosure, Pub No. IPCOM000138557D, dated Jul. 24, 2006, IP.com, Amherst, NY (Available online at http://priorartdatabase.com/IPCOM/000138557, last visited Aug. 30, 2010)., Jul. 24, 2006. |
“Combined Search and Examination Report”, for United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 0816228.1 dated Jan. 2009, Jan. 6, 2009. |
“Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 7, 2008”, for United Kingdom Patent Application No. GB 0721863.9, Mar. 7, 2008. |
“Communication (Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)) dated Jan. 30, 2009 issued from the United Kingdom Patent Office”, in related United Kingdom Application No. GB 0818145.5 (8 pages), Jan. 30, 2009. |
“Communication (European Search Report) dated Jun. 26, 2008”, in European Patent Application No. EP 08101394, Jun. 26, 2008. |
“Communication (European Search Report) dated Oct. 17, 2008 issued by the European Patent Office”, in counterpart European Patent Application EP 08156763, Oct. 17, 2008. |
“Communication (International Search Report along with Written Opinion of International Searching Authority) mailed Oct. 8, 2008 issued by the International Searching Authority”, in counterpart International Application PCT/EP 2008/056342, Oct. 8, 2008. |
“Communication (Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority)”, issued in connection with related International Application PCT/EP 2008/051489 and mailed on Sep. 24, 2009 (6 pages), Sep. 24, 2009. |
“Communication (Search Report under Section 17 along with Examination Report under Section 18(3)) dated Oct. 6, 2008 issued by the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office”, in counterpart U.K. Application GB 0809321.3, Oct. 6, 2008. |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC (European Examination Report) dated Oct. 23, 2008”, issued in counterpart European Patent Application No. EP 08101394.8-1238, Oct. 23, 2008. |
“Examination Report”, for counterpart European Patent Applicaiton No. 08153257.4 issued Jun. 2, 2009. |
“Examination Report dated Sep. 11, 2009”, for European Patent Application No. EP 08159355.0, Sep. 11, 2009. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion issued Nov. 24, 2009”, in International Application PCT/EP 2008/056342 ,Nov. 24, 2009. |
“International Search Report”, for International Application No. PCT/FI 2006/050455, dated Jul. 25, 2007. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Aug. 26, 2011”, for PCT/US 2011/034927 titled “Content Delivery Based on User Terminal Events,” to Apple Inc., Aug. 26, 2011. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority mailed Jun. 19, 2009”, for International Application No. PCT/EP 2008/056069, Jun. 19, 2009. |
“International Search Report mailed Mar. 24, 2009”, in related PCT International Application No. PCT/EP 2008/063326 (4 pages), Mar. 24, 2009. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 29, 2011”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/888,680, Apr. 29, 2011, 13 pages. |
“Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2011 issue by the U.S. Patent Office”, in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,124 (29 pages), Mar. 31, 2011. |
“Office Action issued from the USPTO dated Aug. 20, 2009”, issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,593 (14 pages), Aug. 20, 2009. |
“Office Action issued Mar. 17, 2010”, in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,593 (11 pages), Mar. 17, 2010. |
“Office Action Issued Oct. 15, 2010 by the U.S. Patent Office”, in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/080,124 (28 pages), Oct. 15, 2010. |
“U.K. Search Report under Section 17 dated Oct. 23, 2007”, in U.K. Application No. 0712280.7, Oct. 23, 2007. |
“Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Mar. 24, 2009 issued from the International Searching Authority”, in related PCT International Application No. PCT/EP 2008/063326 (5 pages), Mar. 24, 2009. |
“XP002456252—Statement in Accordance with the Notice from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007”, concerning business methods (OJ Nov. 2007; p. 592-593), Nov. 1, 2007, 592-593. |
Hillard, Dustin et al., “Improving Ad Relevance in Sponsored Search”, Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, WSDM'10, Feb. 4-6, 2010, Session: Ads, pp. 361-369, ACM, New York, New York, USA, 2010., Feb. 4, 2010, 361-369. |
Internet Reference, , “Specific Media Behavioral Targeting Index”, Specific Media, Inc., Irvine, CA, 2010, Available online at http://www.specificmedia.com/behavioral-targeting.php. |
Langheinrich, Marc et al., “Unintrusive Customization Techniques for Web Advertising”, Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, vol. 31, No. 11, May 1999, pp. 1259-1272, Elsevier North-Holland, Inc., New York, NY, 1999., May 11, 1999, 1259-1272. |
Mueller, Milton , “Telecommunication Access in Age of Electronic Commerce: Toward a Third-Generation Service Policy”, Nov. 1996, HeinOnline, 49. Fed. Comm L.J., Nov. 1, 1996, 655-665. |
Perkins, Ed , “When to buy airfare”, http://www.smartertrael.com/travel-advice/when-to-buy-airfare.html?id=1628038, Nov. 21, 2006 (4 pages), Nov. 21, 2006. |
Regelson, Moira et al., “Predicting Click-Through Rate Using Keyword Clusters”, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, EC'06, SSA2, Jun. 11, 2006, ACM, 2006., Jun. 11, 2006. |
Richardson, Matthew et al., “Predicting Clicks: Estimating the Click-Through Rate for New Ads”, Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Alberta, Canada, May 8-12, 2007, Session: Advertisements & click estimates, pp. 521-529, ACM, 2007., May 8, 2007, 521-529. |
Shaikh, Baber M. et al., “Customized User Segments for Ad Targeting”, IP.com Prior Art Database Disclosure, Pub No. IPCOM000185640D, dated Jul. 29, 2009 UTC, IP.com, Amherst, NY (Available online at http://priorartdatabase.com/IPCOM/000185640, last visited Aug. 30, 2010)., Jul. 29, 2009. |
“AdWords Reference Guide”, Google, 2004. |
Ghose, Anindya et al., “An Empirical Analysis of Search Engine Advertising: Sponsored Search in Electronic Markets”, Management Science, Informs, 2009. |
Karuga, Gilber G. et al., “AdPalette: An Algorithm for Customizing Online Advertisements on the Fly”, Decision Support Systems, vol. 32, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090099906 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60999004 | Oct 2007 | US |