System, method, and computer program for providing a pricing platform for performing different types of pricing calculations for different customers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12014387
  • Patent Number
    12,014,387
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 23, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 18, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
The present disclosure relates to a system, method, and computer program for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations. An instance of the price-calculation pipeline is created for each of a plurality of customers of the pricing platform. The instances of the price-calculation pipeline are executed to perform pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations. For each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, a performance metric is generated for each of the modular pricing stages within the instance. The performance metrics are displayed in a user dashboard that provides user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the platform. The computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages are adjusted in accordance with received user input.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to pricing platforms, and more specifically to a system and method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations.


2. Description of the Background Art

A platform-based service allows developers and customers to create, host, and deploy applications without having to set up and maintain the infrastructure for such, with the added benefit of being able to adjust scalability. One type of application that is essential to many customers' businesses is pricing applications. Unfortunately, because such a pricing platform would be used for different customers with different pricing calculation needs, it is hard to build one big monolith system that is tailored to and optimized for every customer. For example, some customers perform certain types of calculations and may need more processing power in certain areas, whereas other customers may need more processing power in other areas. As it would be difficult to build one application that is optimized for everyone, there is a need for a modular system so that an administrator or machine-learning system can customize how the resources are allocated to different stages.


One of the disadvantages, however, with typical modular services, such as microservices, is that there are often overhead delays between the microservices communication. Therefore, there is a need for a way to minimize the delays while being able to provide optimization to the pricing platform. This is solved in the present application by making sure that for each instance of the pricing pipeline, all modular stages operate within the same process boundary so that there are minimal delays in communication between stages.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure describes a system, method, and computer program for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations. The method is performed by a computer system that includes servers, storage systems, networks, operating systems, and databases.


The invention is a system and method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for different customers having different pricing calculation needs. Despite the customer variance, the system is able to provide a pricing platform that is tailored to and optimized for each particular customer's pricing calculation needs. It does this by creating an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of the customers of the pricing platform, where the price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages. It then executes each instance of the price-calculation pipeline and generates a performance metric for each modular pricing stage within each instance of the price-calculation pipeline. The system then displays the performance metrics to the user (e.g., an administrator) and enables the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages within an instance of the pipeline. In addition to enabling each customer to optimize the pricing platform despite the customers having different pricing calculation needs, the system groups the modular pricing stages within a single instance to be executed within the same process boundary to reduce communication delays and thereby increase efficiency of the system.


In one embodiment, a method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, where the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages, comprises the following steps:

    • creating an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of a plurality of customers of the pricing platform, wherein the price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages for performing pricing calculations;
    • executing the instances of the price-calculation pipeline to perform pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein:
      • inputs to the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are cart data and outputs of the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are price calculations,
      • the modular pricing stages within a single instance of the price-calculation pipeline are executed within the same process boundary, and
      • the computational resources allocated to each modular pricing stage within an instance of the price-calculation pipeline are independently configurable;
    • for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, generating a performance metric for each of the modular pricing stages within the instance;
    • displaying the performance metrics in a user dashboard and providing user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the platform, wherein the allocation of computational resources to the modular pricing stages is independently configurable for each customer and for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline;
    • receiving user input to make one or more adjustments to the computational resources allocated to the modular pricing stages; and
    • adjusting the computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages in accordance with the user input.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a flowchart that illustrate a method, according to one embodiment, for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram that illustrates an example software architecture according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram that illustrates an example of one instance of the pricing pipeline for one client application according to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present disclosure describes a system, method, and computer program for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, where the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages. The method is performed by a computer system that includes servers, storage systems, networks, operating systems, and databases (“the system”).


A system and method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations is provided, where the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages. The system creates an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of a plurality of customers of the pricing platform. The price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages for performing pricing calculations. The system executes the instances of the price-calculation pipeline to perform pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations. For each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, the system generates a performance metric for each of the modular pricing stages within the instance. The system displays the performance metrics in a user dashboard and provides user controls that enable the user (e.g., an administrator) to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the platform, where the allocation of computational resources to the modular pricing stages is independently configurable for each customer and for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline. The system receives user input to make one or more adjustments to the computational resources allocated to the modular pricing stages. The system then adjusts the computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages in accordance with the user input.


Example implementations of the method are described in more detail with respect to FIGS. 1-3.


1. Method for Providing a Pricing Platform for Performing Different Types of Pricing Calculations for Different Customers



FIG. 1 illustrates a method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, where the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages. The system creates an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of the customers of the pricing platform, where the price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages (step 110).


Modular pricing stages are specific steps in a pricing operation and are executed as separate software modules. Examples of modular pricing stages include matching products, matching attributes, applying rules, applying promotions, price matrix, price list item, price escalator, quantity and selling term, pricing callback or pricing extension, approval check, deal guidance check, etc. A person skilled in the art would understand that the modular pricing stages may include other examples not listed above within the scope of the present invention. Within an instance, all the modular pricing stages are executed within the same process boundary and on the same machine, and they share the same memory address space.


The system executes each of the instances of the price-calculation pipeline (step 120). The amount of computation performed at each modular pricing stage varies among the instances of the pricing pipeline due to the different types of pricing calculations of the different customers. Inputs to the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are cart data and outputs of the instances are price calculations (step 120a). In certain embodiments, if the cart data is large, the cart data will be divided into batches. Each batch will be assigned to an instance of the pricing pipeline, and the plurality of instances may run in parallel. A customer may have one or more instances of the pricing pipeline, depending on the pricing calculation requirements of the customer. The modular pricing stages within a single instance are executed within the same process boundary (step 120b). Different instances may run on different machines and, therefore, in different process boundaries. The computational resources allocated to each modular pricing stage within an instance of the pricing pipeline are independently configurable (step 120c).


The system generates a performance metric for each modular pricing stage within each instance of the price-calculation pipeline (step 130). The performance metric indicates how long it takes for each of the modular pricing stages to run a batch, and when the performance metrics are aggregated, it provides the overall throughput of the pipeline. The system displays the performance metrics in a user dashboard and provides user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the pricing platform (step 140). The amount of computational resources allocated to a particular modular pricing stage varies across instances. For example, the amount of computational resources allocated to pricing stage 3 in instance X may be different than the computational resources allocated to pricing stage 3 in instance Y.


The system receives user input to make one or more adjustments to the computational resources allocated to the modular pricing stages (step 150). The system adjusts the computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages in accordance with the user input (step 160).


In certain embodiments, allocating more resources means to add more resources to modular pricing stages that are slower in order to balance the load. Examples of computational resources include memory (e.g., RAM), processing power (e.g., CPU), PODS (i.e., horizontal scaling or an increase in copies), etc. In certain embodiments, an administrator manually adjusts the computational resources. In certain embodiments, the system can adjust the computational resources automatically by means of a machine-learning system that uses the historical recommendations and the corresponding approval or rejections of the user. For each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, certain modular pricing stages may be mandatory and certain modular pricing stages may be optional and, therefore, a pass through. In other words, for the modular pricing stages that are optional, the user may choose to lower the allocation to the modular pricing stage such that its impact is negligible.


In certain embodiments, adjusting the computational resources allocated to a modular pricing stage comprises increasing or decreasing the computational resources assigned to the modular pricing stage. In certain embodiments, the system recommends to the user one or more adjustments to the modular pricing stages in order to optimize throughput of the instances of the pricing pipeline. In certain embodiments, receiving user input and making adjustments includes receiving the user feedback on the recommendations and making any recommended adjustments to the modular pricing stages that were approved by the user. In certain embodiments, the user may adjust how long the cart data is stored and how much of the cart data is stored. For example, the cart data may be stored short term (e.g., one to two months, two weeks, etc.), but the price master data may be stored long term (e.g., indefinitely). In certain embodiments, the cart data is divided into batches, the batches of cart data are run in parallel using multiple instances of the pricing pipeline, and the batches are combined before updating the price.


2. Example System Architecture



FIG. 2 illustrates an example architecture for a pricing platform 200 that performs the methods described herein. However, the methods described herein may be implemented in other systems and are not limited to the illustrated pricing platform 200. A plurality of client applications 210 associated with different customers having different pricing calculation needs sends data over a network to the web APIs 230 of the pricing platform 200. The web APIs 230 supply the data to a plurality of cart management modules 240, where each cart management module 240 manages the cart data for one of the client applications 210 (i.e., keeps track of cart contents and responds to the actions of the end user, such as a sales representative, on the cart). An instance of the pricing pipeline 250 is created for each client application 210, and the cart management module 240 provides the cart data to the corresponding instance of the pricing pipeline 250. Within each instance of the pricing pipeline 250, a plurality of modular pricing stages is executed on the pricing platform 200.


The performance metrics module 260 monitors the execution of the modular pricing stages and generates a performance metric for each modular pricing stage within each instance of the pricing pipeline 250. It provides the performance metrics both to a recommendation module 270, which provides recommendations on how to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages, as well as to the user interface module 280, which displays the performance metrics and provides user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the pricing platform 200.


3. Example of One Instance of a Pricing Pipeline



FIG. 3 is a block diagram that illustrates an example of one instance of the pricing pipeline for one client application according to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2. However, as noted above, the methods described herein may be implemented in other systems and are not limited to the illustrated pricing platform 200. In FIG. 3, one customer of the pricing platform 200, i.e., user 300, enters data into one of the client applications 210. The data is transmitted over a network 302 to the web APIs 230 of the pricing platform 200. The cart management module 240 receives the data as a request 304. In certain embodiments, multiple requests can be executed at the same time. It then determines whether there is a need for a pricing calculation 306. It prepares option lines for the batch 308. In certain embodiments, if the cart data is large, the cart data will be divided into batches. Each batch will be assigned to instances of the pricing pipeline 250 that may be run in parallel. Then it sends for the pricing calculation 310 from the instance(s) of the pricing pipeline 250.


The pricing pipeline 250 receives the cart data from the cart management module 240, which is denoted as the source 312. The pricing pipeline 250 then processes the cart data in the first modular pricing stage (i.e., pricing stage 1314). Subsequent to the first modular pricing stage are n modular pricing stages. These are denoted in FIG. 3 as pricing stage 2316, pricing stage 3318, pricing stage 4320, pricing stage 5322, pricing stage 6324, and pricing stage n 326. A person skilled in the art would understand that there can be more or less modular pricing stages within the scope of the present invention. As noted previously, the outputs of the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are price calculations, which are denoted as the sink 328.


The price calculations, which are the result of the modular pricing stages, update the pricing 330 in the cart management module 240. If the cart data was divided into multiple batches, the instances of the pricing pipeline 250 will be combined before updating the price. The updated pricing is then sent to the web APIs 230, which transmit it through the network 302 to the client application 210. As noted previously, the system monitors the execution of the modular pricing stages 314-326 and generates a performance metric for each modular pricing stage 314-326 within an instance of the pricing pipeline 250. The system displays the performance metrics in a user interface module and provides user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages 314-326 executing on the pricing platform 200.


4. General


The methods described with respect to FIGS. 1-3 are embodied in software and performed by a computer system (comprising one or more computing devices) executing the software. A person skilled in the art would understand that a computer system has one or more memory units, disks, or other physical, computer-readable storage media for storing software instructions, as well as one or more processors for executing the software instructions.


As will be understood by those familiar with the art, the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. Accordingly, the above disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages, the method comprising: creating an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of a plurality of customers of the pricing platform, wherein the price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages for performing pricing calculations;executing the instances of the price-calculation pipeline to perform pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein: inputs to the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are cart data and outputs of the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are price calculations,the modular pricing stages within a single instance of the price-calculation pipeline are executed within the same process boundary, andthe computational resources allocated to each modular pricing stage within an instance of the price-calculation pipeline are independently configurable;for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, generating a performance metric for each of the modular pricing stages within the instance;displaying the performance metrics in a user dashboard executed by a computer server and providing user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the platform, wherein the allocation of computational resources to the modular pricing stages is independently configurable for each customer and for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline;receiving user input to make one or more adjustments to the computational resources allocated to the modular pricing stages; andadjusting the computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages in accordance with the user input, wherein, for at least one modular pricing stage executing on the platform, automatically adjusting the computational resources allocated by means of a machine-learning system that uses historical recommendations and corresponding approvals or rejections of the user.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein adjusting the computational resources allocated to a modular pricing stage comprises increasing or decreasing the computational resources assigned to the modular pricing stage.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: recommending to the user one or more adjustments to the modular pricing stages in order to optimize throughput of the instances of the pricing pipeline.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein receiving user input and making adjustments include: receiving the user feedback on the recommendations; andmaking any recommended adjustments to the modular pricing stages that were approved by the user.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the user adjusts how long the cart data is stored and how much of the cart data is stored.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cart data is divided into batches, the batches of cart data are run in parallel using multiple instances of the pricing pipeline, and the batches are combined before updating the price.
  • 7. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising a computer program, that, when executed by a computer system, enables the computer system to perform the following method for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages, the steps comprising: creating an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of a plurality of customers of the pricing platform, wherein the price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages for performing pricing calculations;executing the instances of the price-calculation pipeline to perform pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein: inputs to the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are cart data and outputs of the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are price calculations,the modular pricing stages within a single instance of the price-calculation pipeline are executed within the same process boundary, andthe computational resources allocated to each modular pricing stage within an instance of the price-calculation pipeline are independently configurable;for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, generating a performance metric for each of the modular pricing stages within the instance;displaying the performance metrics in a user dashboard executed by a computer server and providing user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the platform, wherein the allocation of computational resources to the modular pricing stages is independently configurable for each customer and for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline;receiving user input to make one or more adjustments to the computational resources allocated to the modular pricing stages; andadjusting the computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages in accordance with the user input, wherein, for at least one modular pricing stage executing on the platform, automatically adjusting the computational resources allocated by means of a machine-learning system that uses historical recommendations and corresponding approvals or rejections of the user.
  • 8. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein adjusting the computational resources allocated to a modular pricing stage comprises increasing or decreasing the computational resources assigned to the modular pricing stage.
  • 9. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, further comprising: recommending to the user one or more adjustments to the modular pricing stages in order to optimize throughput of the instances of the pricing pipeline.
  • 10. The computer-readable medium of claim 9, wherein receiving user input and making adjustments include: receiving the user feedback on the recommendations; andmaking any recommended adjustments to the modular pricing stages that were approved by the user.
  • 11. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein the user adjusts how long the cart data is stored and how much of the cart data is stored.
  • 12. The computer-readable medium of claim 7, wherein the cart data is divided into batches, the batches of cart data are run in parallel using multiple instances of the pricing pipeline, and the batches are combined before updating the price.
  • 13. A computer system for providing a pricing platform for performing pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein the pricing platform has a price-calculation pipeline with multiple stages, the system comprising: one or more processors;one or more memory units coupled to the one or more processors, wherein the one or more memory units store instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to perform the operations of: creating an instance of the price-calculation pipeline for each of a plurality of customers of the pricing platform, wherein the price-calculation pipeline has a plurality of modular pricing stages for performing pricing calculations;executing the instances of the price-calculation pipeline to perform pricing calculations for a plurality of different customers with different types of pricing calculations, wherein: inputs to the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are cart data and outputs of the instances of the price-calculation pipeline are price calculations,the modular pricing stages within a single instance of the price-calculation pipeline are executed within the same process boundary, andthe computational resources allocated to each modular pricing stage within an instance of the price-calculation pipeline are independently configurable;for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline, generating a performance metric for each of the modular pricing stages within the instance;displaying the performance metrics in a user dashboard executed by a computer server and providing user controls that enable the user to adjust the computational resources allocated to each of the modular pricing stages executing on the platform, wherein the allocation of computational resources to the modular pricing stages is independently configurable for each customer and for each instance of the price-calculation pipeline;receiving user input to make one or more adjustments to the computational resources allocated to the modular pricing stages; andadjusting the computational resources allocated to one or more modular pricing stages in accordance with the user input, wherein, for at least one modular pricing stage executing on the platform, automatically adjusting the computational resources allocated by means of a machine-learning system that uses historical recommendations and corresponding approvals or rejections of the user.
  • 14. The computer system of claim 13, wherein adjusting the computational resources allocated to a modular pricing stage comprises increasing or decreasing the computational resources assigned to the modular pricing stage.
  • 15. The computer system of claim 13, further comprising: recommending to the user one or more adjustments to the modular pricing stages in order to optimize throughput of the instances of the pricing pipeline.
  • 16. The computer system of claim 15, wherein receiving user input and making adjustments include: receiving the user feedback on the recommendations; andmaking any recommended adjustments to the modular pricing stages that were approved by the user.
  • 17. The computer system of claim 13, wherein the user adjusts how long the cart data is stored and how much of the cart data is stored.
  • 18. The computer system of claim 13, wherein the cart data is divided into batches, the batches of cart data are run in parallel using multiple instances of the pricing pipeline, and the batches are combined before updating the price.
US Referenced Citations (95)
Number Name Date Kind
5960407 Vivona Sep 1999 A
6473084 Phillips et al. Oct 2002 B1
7328177 Lin-Hendel Feb 2008 B1
7574381 Lin-Hendel Aug 2009 B1
7693762 Dagum Apr 2010 B1
7725358 Brown et al. May 2010 B1
8498954 Malov et al. Jul 2013 B2
8644842 Arrasvuori et al. Feb 2014 B2
9495222 Jackson Nov 2016 B1
9519907 Carter, III et al. Dec 2016 B2
10289261 Aggarwal et al. May 2019 B2
10521491 Krappe et al. Dec 2019 B2
10621640 Krappe et al. Apr 2020 B2
10783575 Krappe et al. Sep 2020 B1
11232508 Krappe Jan 2022 B2
11455373 Krappe et al. Sep 2022 B2
11550786 Naganathan et al. Jan 2023 B1
11604799 Bigdelu et al. Mar 2023 B1
11615080 Naganathan et al. Mar 2023 B1
11615089 Naganathan et al. Mar 2023 B1
11720951 Krappe Aug 2023 B2
20020040332 Maari et al. Apr 2002 A1
20030033240 Balson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20040158560 Wen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20060100912 Kumar et al. May 2006 A1
20060136470 Dettinger et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070016536 Mirlas et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070039209 White et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070087756 Hoffberg Apr 2007 A1
20070162373 Kongtcheu Jul 2007 A1
20070294157 Singla Dec 2007 A1
20080046355 Lo Feb 2008 A1
20080091551 Olheiser et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080177717 Kumar et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090024613 Niu et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090048937 Contreras et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090222319 Cao et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234710 Belgaied Hassine et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090299974 Kataoka et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327166 Carter, III et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100179859 Davis et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100262478 Bamborough et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100306120 Ciptawilangga Dec 2010 A1
20110246136 Haratsch et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246434 Cheenath et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120173384 Herrmann et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120221410 Bennett et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120246035 Cross et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120254092 Malov et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120259801 Ji et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130103391 Millmore et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130132273 Stiege et al. May 2013 A1
20130304757 Gebhard et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140025529 Honeycutt et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140040275 Dang et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140136443 Kinsey, II et al. May 2014 A1
20140149273 Angell et al. May 2014 A1
20140379755 Kuriakose et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150120526 Peterffy et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150142704 London May 2015 A1
20150309705 Keeler et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310005 Ryger et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310114 Ryger et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310115 Ryger et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150348551 Gruber et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150378156 Kuehne Dec 2015 A1
20160034923 Majumdar et al. Feb 2016 A1
20170004588 Isaacson et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170068670 Orr et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170124176 Beznos et al. May 2017 A1
20170124655 Crabtree et al. May 2017 A1
20170235732 Williams et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170243107 Jolley et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170351241 Bowers et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170358024 Mattingly et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180005208 Aggarwal et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180096406 Krappe et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180218032 Wong et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180285595 Jessen Oct 2018 A1
20180293640 Krappe Oct 2018 A1
20180336247 Ignatyev et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180349324 Krappe et al. Dec 2018 A1
20180349377 Verma et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190258632 Pal et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190370388 Li et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200057946 Singaraju et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200065354 Krappe et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200334241 Muralidhar et al. Oct 2020 A1
20210064483 Paramasivam et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210089587 Gupta et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210090575 Mahmood et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210107141 Shrivastava et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210241301 Christensen Aug 2021 A1
20220148071 Krappe May 2022 A1
20220318223 Ahluwalia et al. Oct 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
2742395 Jan 2019 CA
1315705 Mar 2001 CN
106910091 Jun 2017 CN
2650776 Oct 2013 EP
3073421 Sep 2016 EP
2001290977 Oct 2001 JP
2017146909 Aug 2017 JP
0052605 Sep 2000 WO
03003146 Jan 2003 WO
WO-2005006122 Jan 2005 WO
2015106353 Jul 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Alicia “Developing Product Configurators for Use in a Multinational Industrial Goods Company”, May 2013, MIT, pp. 1-87 (Year: 2013).
Torsten “Controlling instruments' for price management: a single case study on a B2B company in the OEM business operating in the German electrical/electronics industry”, Sep. 2018, A thesis submitted to The University of Gloucestershire, pp. 1-339 (Year: 2018).
Oracle: Automating the Quote-to-Cash Process: An Oracle White Paper, Jun. 2009, pp. 1-19.
McCormick, M., “What is Quote to Cash?” Blog, BlackCurve, Jan. 20, 2016, pp. 1-8.
Microsoft/APTTUS: Ultimate Guide to Quote-To-Cash for Microsoft Customers, Web Archives, Oct. 1, 2015, pp. 1-28.
Morelli et al., “IBM SPSS Predictive Analytics: Optimizing Decisions at the point of impact”, 2010, pp. 1-59.
Riggins, J., “Interview Quote-to-Cash Pioneers Apttus Links Leads to Revenue”, May 21, 2014, pp. 1-7.
Spedicato, G., et al., Machine Learning Methods to Perform Pricing Optimization. A Comparison with Standard GLMs, Dec. 2018, pp. 1-21.
Wainewright, Phil, “Salesforce, Microsoft quote-to-cash partner Apttus raises $88m”, Sep. 29, 2016, pp. 1-7.
Wainewright, Phil, Apttus Applies Azure Machine Learning to Quote-to-Cash, Apr. 3, 2016, pp. 1-5.
Wireless News: Banglalink Keeps Mobile Subscribers Using Predictive Analytics with KXEN, Close-Up Media, Inc., Oct. 5, 2013, pp. 1-2.
Xie, Qitao et al., “Chatbot Application on Cryptocurrency”, 2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics, 2019, pp. 1-8.