This invention relates generally to ecommerce systems, and, more specifically, to a system that provides similar product recommendations for non-merchant publishers based on publisher preferences.
The role of influencers and bloggers in commerce is growing rapidly. Many shoppers, especially younger generations, prefer to purchase products that are vetted and recommended by a trusted influencer. Certain providers of digital shopping platforms, such as SHOPSTYLE, maintain product databases and search engines that are accessible to third-party, non-merchant publishers (e.g., bloggers, influencers, etc.). Non-merchant publishers are able to search the product database and insert links to products in the database in their sites. When a user of a publisher site clicks on a linked product, the user is redirected to the applicable merchant webpage for the product. The user's shopping session on the merchant's site is associated with the digital shopping platform, which receives a commission for any sale made during the session, and in turn passes a share of it to the publisher.
The Internet “shelf life” of blog posts (or other non-merchant publisher posts) tend to be significantly longer than the availability of the products recommended in the posts. Therefore, when a product referenced in a post is sold out, it would be helpful to provide the user with similar product recommendations.
The present disclosure relates to a system, method, and computer program for automatically providing similar product recommendations for sold-out products promoted on non-merchant publisher sites, wherein the similar product recommendations are filtered for publisher preferences. A computer system with a product database provides a platform that enables non-merchant publishers to search products in the database, create call-to-actions (e.g., a “buy” button) on publisher sites for products in the database, and automatically receive similar product recommendations when end users of the publisher sites attempt to purchase promoted products that are now sold out. Once a publisher creates a call-to-action for a product that subsequently becomes sold out, similar product recommendations are provided without requiring any action on the publisher's part to change the publisher's site. Similar product recommendations are tailored to each publisher to account for publisher preferences. In certain embodiments, publisher preferences are learned by the system based on publisher behavior, and in other embodiments, publisher preferences are inputted by each publisher.
In one embodiment, providing the platform comprises the following steps:
The present disclosure relates to a system, method, and computer program for automatically providing similar product recommendations for sold-out products promoted on non-merchant publisher sites, wherein the similar product recommendations are filtered for publisher preferences. Specifically, a digital shopping platform is provided that enables third-party, non-merchant publishers to search a product database with products from multiple merchants, create call-to-actions on the non-merchant publisher sites with respect to products in the database, and automatically receive similar product recommendations when end users of the publisher sites attempt to purchase promoted products in the database that are now sold out. Once a publisher creates a call-to-action for a product that subsequently becomes sold out, similar product recommendations are provided without requiring any action on the publisher's part to change the publisher's site. The platform is accessible to multiple non-merchant publishers that promote merchant products. The method is performed by a computer system (“the system”). The term “publisher” herein references to non-merchant publishers that promote third party merchant products. A “publisher site” is a publisher's website or mobile application content.
The system provides a publisher user interface to the product database that enables a plurality of non-merchant publishers, each associated with a different publisher site, to register with the system, access the product database, and create call-to-actions on the different publisher sites with respect to products in the product database (step 120). An example of a call-to-action is a “buy” button or link that redirects an end user of the non-merchant publisher site to a merchant product webpage from which the end user can purchase a product promoted on the publisher's site.
The system provides an application programming interface (API) that enables the system to receive, via client applications running non-merchant publishers' sites, call-to-action selections on non-merchant publisher sites from the end users with respect to products in the product database (step 130). An end user initiates the call-to-action from a non-merchant publisher site. The system can receive call-to-action requests from many different non-merchant publisher sites. Examples of client applications that can run non-merchant publisher sites are web browsers and mobile applications.
In response to receiving a call-to-action request to purchase a product, the system determines whether the product is in stock at the merchant associated with the product (steps 135, 140). If so, the system redirects the end user's client application (e.g., web browser) to a page on the merchant's site for the product (step 145). The end user's shopping session on the merchant's site is associated with the system, which typically provides the publisher with a share of any commission received from the merchant for product(s) purchased during the session.
In response to receiving a call-to-action to purchase a product that is out-of-stock, the system identifies a plurality of similar products to the out-of-stock product in the product database by comparing product images and/or product metadata in the product database (step 150). For example, the system may search the product database for products with similar metadata or the same GTIN number (a 14-digit number that is used to identify trade items, products or services). Visual image analysis of product images may be used to identified similar products. The visual image analysis may be performed by the system or by a third-party source. In one embodiment, the system uses a combination of metadata searches and visual image analysis to identify similar products.
Identifying a plurality of similar products in step 150 may mean identifying similar products in real-time or retrieving information for previously-identified similar products. In certain embodiments, the system may identify the similar products in advance of receiving the call-to-action request and then retrieve information about the identified similar products in response to receiving the call-to-action request. For example, system may track the products in the database for which non-merchant publishers have created call-to-actions, and, in response to any of these products going out of stock, identify similar products and cache this information for quick retrieval upon receiving a call-to-action request.
The system filters the identified similar products by one or more publisher preferences specific to the non-merchant publisher associated with the call-to-action request (step 160). In one embodiment, the publisher preferences are explicit preferences specified by the publisher when the publisher registers with the system or updates his/her profile in the system. In an alternate embodiment, the system ascertains publisher preferences based on past publisher behavior. For example, the system may track the merchants associated with products in the product database to which the publisher links, the typical price range of products to which the publisher links, the type of products, etc. The system may filter out identified similar products that are inconsistent with the publisher's past behavior. For example, the system may filter out identified similar products from merchants to whom the publisher has never linked or filter products that are outside a price range of products typically promoted by the publisher. After filtering the similar product search results by one or more publisher preferences, the system enables the end user that made the call-to-action selection to view information on one or more of the filtered and identified similar products (step 170).
In certain embodiments, the system enables publishers to create call-to-actions for products in the product database using “product widgets.” Product widgets are software code that enable certain functionality in a web browser or mobile application with respect to products associated with the widget. For example, a product widget may display a product image, a title or brief description, and a “buy” button for purchasing the displayed product, and it may initiate the call-to-action request to the system in response to an end user selecting the “buy” button.
In certain embodiments, the system provides a user interface for publishers that enables them to create instances of widgets and associate them with products in the product database. The user interface displays one or more widgets. Each widget type may display product information differently. The user interface enables the publisher to select a widget and associate one or more products in the product database with an instance of the selected widget. Each instance of a widget has a unique widget ID. Each widget ID is mapped to product identifiers for the products associated with the instance of the widget. The widget ID also is associated with a publisher ID for the publisher that created the instance of the widget. The user interface enables the publisher to copy the software code for the instance of the widget. The publisher can then incorporate the code into the publisher's website or mobile application.
The system retrieves product metadata associated with each of the identified product IDs (step 240). The metadata may include an image of the product, the brand of the product, a title or brief description of the product, the merchant selling the product, the price, and the current availability (i.e., in stock or out of stock). The metadata may be retrieved from a cached index of products or the product database. The system provides some or all of the product metadata to the requesting widget (step 250).
The widget uses the product metadata to display product information on the publisher sites (step 260). For example, for each product associated with the widget, the widget may display an image of the product, a title, and a price. The widget also displays a call-to-action, such as a “buy” button, for each product associated with the widget. The widget may display the product information and call-to-action directly on the publisher's site or within a frame/window on the site.
In response to a user selecting a call-to-action to purchase a product, the widget notifies the system of the call-to-action selection, along with the associated product ID (step 270). The system uses the product ID to look up availability information in the product database or a cached product index. If the product is in stock, the server redirects the user's browser to the merchant webpage associated with the product ID (step 280). If the product is out-of-stock, the system notifies the widget and provides the widget with metadata for similar products within the product database that have been filtered for publisher preferences (also step 280). As discussed above, similar products may be identified by searching product metadata within the system and/or doing visual analysis to identify similar-looking products.
In response to receiving notification that a product is out-of-stock, the widget indicates the product is out-of-stock on the publisher's site (step 290). For example, the widget may display a notice that the product is out-of-stock, as well as a call-to-action that enables a user to see similar products. If the user clicks on the call-to-action to see similar products, the widget displays a window/frame/modal window (e.g., an iframe) with similar products. Each similar product is displayed with a call-to-action for buying the product. If a user clicks on a call-to-action for a similar product, the system repeats steps 280 and, if applicable, 290 for the similar product.
In certain embodiments, the system notifies a widget of any out-of-stock products associated with the widget upon the widget initializing. In such cases, the call-to-action initially displayed by the widget on the publisher's site may be a call-to-action to see similar products.
Server 410 interfaces with publisher sites 420 and merchant websites 430 for the purpose of providing product information to end users, processing call-to-action requests, and redirecting customers to merchants' sites, as described above.
The methods described herein may be implemented in a system configured differently and are not limited to the system architecture illustrated in
The methods described herein are embodied in software and performed by a computer system (comprising one or more computing devices) executing the software. A person skilled in the art would understand that a computer system has one or more memory units, disks, or other physical, computer-readable storage media for storing software instructions, as well as one or more processors for executing the software instructions.
As will be understood by those familiar with the art, the invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. Accordingly, the above disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/918,706 filed on Jul. 1, 2020, and titled “System, Method, and Computer Program for Providing Similar Product Recommendations for Non-Merchant Publishers based on Publisher Preferences,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/884,627 filed on Aug. 8, 2019, and titled “System, Method, and Computer Program for Providing Similar Product Recommendations for Non-Merchant Publishers based on Publisher Preferences.” The contents of the foregoing provisional and non-provisional patent applications are incorporated by reference as if fully disclosed herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4910672 | Off et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 5250789 | Johnsen | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5500890 | Rogge et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 6029141 | Bezos et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6101482 | DiAngelo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6128600 | Imamura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6341353 | Herman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6460036 | Herz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6571279 | Herz et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6611814 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6725222 | Musgrove et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 7162443 | Shah | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7305355 | Tarvydas et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7328176 | Tarvydas et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7512548 | Bezos et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
| 7734729 | Du et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7752535 | Satyavolu | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7925546 | Jacobi et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8036934 | Mankoff | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8176067 | Ahmad et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8224935 | Bandopadhyay et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8359309 | Provine et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8392288 | Miller | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8489456 | Burgess et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8510166 | Neven | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8527436 | Salaka et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8661029 | Kim et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8676665 | Tarvydas et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8694511 | Corduneanu et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8812532 | Skaf | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8844010 | Brady et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8935192 | Ventilla et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 9159079 | Lambert et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9201672 | Arana et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
| 9384504 | Lampert | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9779441 | Jadhav et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
| 9922327 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 10540698 | Pratt et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10740781 | Tam et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
| 10762511 | Pope | Sep 2020 | B1 |
| 10832305 | Woodbeck | Nov 2020 | B1 |
| 10970755 | Doubinski et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11568468 | Locks et al. | Jan 2023 | B2 |
| 11720575 | Huang et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
| 20010032128 | Kepecs | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049628 | Icho | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056359 | Abreu | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020038255 | Tarvydas et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046109 | Leonard et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095335 | Barnett et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020117544 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124255 | Reichardt et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143660 | Himmel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030158844 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20040083134 | Spero et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122736 | Strock et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040254855 | Shah | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050131768 | Rodriguez et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267809 | Zheng | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060085255 | Hastings et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060122899 | Lee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129463 | Zicherman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242011 | Bell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060259364 | Strock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265281 | Sprovieri et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070033531 | Marsh | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070050258 | Dohse | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203784 | Keller et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271147 | Crespo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271149 | Siegel | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005090 | Khan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033939 | Khandelwal | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103887 | Oldham et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109327 | Mayle et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120129 | Seubert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080149710 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154731 | Mesaros | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155547 | Weber et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208606 | Allsop et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255962 | Chang | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294643 | Moss et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080319854 | Duroux et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090024464 | Weiss et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083164 | Hull et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099920 | Aharoni et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234737 | Sarelson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240588 | Turner et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100042515 | Crespo et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100049538 | Frazer et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070448 | Omoigui | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161399 | Posner et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174623 | McPhie et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205068 | Hodson et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110022448 | Strock et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035379 | Chen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110060998 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110093520 | Doyle | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110106605 | Malik et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110131098 | Bafia et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110167456 | Kokenos et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173097 | McKee | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191181 | Blackhurst et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191310 | Liao et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20120030065 | Tarvydas et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120078731 | Linevsky et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120158705 | Konig et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166268 | Griffiths | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120191568 | Gandhi | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197700 | Kalin | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120197753 | Kalin | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120203632 | Blum et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271691 | Hammad et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120284108 | Fontana et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120311509 | Maggiotto et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120330729 | Carter | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130006713 | Haake | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130006803 | Oskolkov et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130024282 | Kansal | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130030853 | Agarwal et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130046621 | Asseoff et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130073356 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130144706 | Qawami et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130173364 | Choong et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130179303 | Petrou et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130185125 | Celorio-Martinez et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130204748 | Sugiura | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130246199 | Carlson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130304563 | Haupt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130346221 | Rangachari et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140006165 | Grigg et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140100929 | Burgess et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140122203 | Johnson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140129308 | Rappoport | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140143251 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172536 | Korzenko et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140200997 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140207551 | Van Der Spoel | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214508 | Lee et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140279214 | Wagoner-Edwards et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140281864 | Frankel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140372193 | Jorgensen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150032522 | Dintenfass et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032538 | Calman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150032602 | Blackhurst et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150039481 | Els et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150088607 | Georgoff et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150112774 | Georgoff et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150112789 | Yadati et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150112836 | Godsey et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150178820 | Green et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150220979 | Ouimet et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150302424 | Akbarpour et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150310468 | Mesaros | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150347595 | Norman et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150348140 | Campbell | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160110762 | Mastierov et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160140610 | McDonough | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20170039583 | Aissa | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170148046 | Akbarpour Mashadi et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170200219 | Mebed | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20180089692 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180108054 | Doubinski et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180315067 | Shi et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20190130433 | Tam et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20200320607 | Beauchamp | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200334704 | Tam et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20210042812 | Locks et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101194282 | Jun 2008 | CN |
| 10-240823 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| 11-134408 | May 1999 | JP |
| 2000-163480 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2001-109742 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2002-063431 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-245366 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2002-259792 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002-312608 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2008-040753 | Feb 2008 | JP |
| 2012-093953 | May 2012 | JP |
| 2013-218697 | Oct 2013 | JP |
| 2015-082134 | Apr 2015 | JP |
| 1020010077123 | Aug 2001 | KR |
| 1020090008777 | Jan 2009 | KR |
| 20100040829 | Apr 2010 | KR |
| 1020100099843 | Sep 2010 | KR |
| 1020110055182 | May 2011 | KR |
| 1020110120241 | Nov 2011 | KR |
| 2428741 | Sep 2011 | RU |
| 2012074919 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| 2012103462 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012165033 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 014205552 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2018071673 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Au-Yong-Oliveria, Manuel, Strain Effect—A Case Study About the Power of Nano-Influencers, Jun. 1, 2019, 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 1-5 (Year: 2019). |
| Amazon, “Creating a Wish List”, available Feb. 25, 2011, retrieved May 29, 2014, http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?ie=UTF8&nodeld=501088. |
| Bajaj, “Shopping for Diwali? Here's how you can crack the best online deals”, Oct. 20, 2016, pp. 1-3. |
| Hong, Hsuan et al., “Determining advanced recycling fees and subsidies in “E-scrap” reverse supply chains”, Journal of Environmental Management 92 (2011), pp. 1495-1502. |
| Impulse, “Save your favorite products on an impluse. Buy them when you're ready”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, pp. 1-2. |
| Keepa, “Features”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, p. 1-1. |
| Nakamura, “Out-of-Browser” Function Supported Outside the Web Browser, Oct. 1, 2009, vol. 94, p. 154-155. |
| Oliveira et al., “Strain Effect—A Case Study About the Power of Nano-Influencers”, 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Jun. 19-22, 2019, Coimbra, Portugal. |
| Owen et al., “Going Beyond Redemption: Closing the Loop with Card-Linked Offers”, Jul. 12, 2012, pp. 1-8. |
| Shoptagr, “When you discover something you want, save it to Shoptagr”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, p. 1-1. |
| Taggr, “Wish List any Store & Price Watch”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, p. 1-1. |
| Ziftr Alerts, “You do the shopping. We'll do the searching. It's that simple”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, pp. 1-2. |
| Wishlist, “Extension for Wishlist App”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, p. 1-1. |
| Wishtack, “Gift Ideas & Wishlist”, retrieved Oct. 23, 2016, p. 1-1. |
| Word Press, “Status Tracking”, retrieved Oct. 25, 2016, pp. 1-4. |
| Levchenko, Kirill et al., “Click Trajectories: End-to-End Analysis of the Spam Value Chain”, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2011, pp. 431-446. |
| Ying, Wang et al., “Multi-agent Framework for Third Party Logistics in E-Commerce”, Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, pp. 431-436. |
| Kim, Yong Soo et al., “Recommender system based on click stream data using association rule mining”, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011), pp. 13320-13327. |
| Kuramitsu, Kimio et al., “Openbasket: a Pick-and-Droppable Shopping Agent Placing Orders to Multiple Electronic Storefronts”, IEEE, 2001, pp. 65-74. |
| Liao, Shu-hsien et al., “Mining customer knowledge to implement online shopping and home delivery for hypermarkets”, Expert Systems with Applications 38 (2011), pp. 3982-3991. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230117410 A1 | Apr 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62884627 | Aug 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16918706 | Jul 2020 | US |
| Child | 18085504 | US |