Patent Application
20220107934
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
One or more implementations relate generally to operations on data, and more particularly to operating on data stored in a data structure.
The subject matter discussed in the background section should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its mention in the background section. Similarly, a problem mentioned in the background section or associated with the subject matter of the background section should not be assumed to have been previously recognized in the prior art. The subject matter in the background section merely represents different approaches, which in and of themselves may also be inventions.
Conventionally, the data stored in a data structure has been maintained for various purposes, such as providing access to the data by users, allowing the data to be updated, etc. However, traditional techniques for maintaining data in structures have exhibited various limitations. For example, when a data structure is shared by multiple users, the entire data structure is generally locked while a change is being made to a portion of the data structure for preserving data integrity. As another example, changes desired to be made to the data in the data structure may be complex and thus may take a long time to compute, such that when there are multiple of such complex changes to be made the performance associated with the data structure may be negatively impacted. As a further example, due to the writeable nature of the data structure, methods to identify errors introduced when changes are made to the data may also negatively impact performance associated with the data structure and/or the system on which the data structure is located, particularly when there is a large amount of data within the data structure to validate.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide improved techniques enabling maintenance of data stored in data structures to increase efficiency, functionality, etc. of operations utilized for providing such data structure maintenance.
In accordance with embodiments, there are provided mechanisms and methods for maintaining data stored in a data structure. These mechanisms and methods for maintaining data stored in a data structure can enable embodiments to provide maintenance operations with improved efficiency, functionality, etc.
In an embodiment and by way of example, a method for maintaining data stored in a data structure is provided. In one embodiment, a request to perform a first operation associated with a data structure is received. Additionally, a portion of the data structure utilized for performing the first operation is identified. Further, during performance of the first operation, at least one second operation is blocked only with respect to the portion of the data structure.
In another embodiment, a plurality of changes is applied to a first data structure. In addition, a second data structure storing data derived from the first data structure is identified. Still yet, recalculation of the second data structure is performed after the application of the plurality of changes to the first data structure.
In yet another embodiment, resource utilization of a system is determined to be below a predetermined threshold. Moreover, data stored in a data structure of the system is compared to expected data, in response to the determination. Furthermore, at least one error is identified in the data stored in the data structure, based on the comparison.
While one or more implementations and techniques are described with reference to an embodiment in which maintaining data stored in a data structure is implemented in a system having an application server providing a front end for an on-demand database service capable of supporting multiple tenants, the one or more implementations and techniques are not limited to multi-tenant databases nor deployment on application servers. Embodiments may be practiced using other database architectures. i.e., ORACLE®, DB2® by IBM and the like without departing from the scope of the embodiments claimed.
Any of the above embodiments may be used alone or together with one another in any combination. The one or more implementations encompassed within this specification may also include embodiments that are only partially mentioned or alluded to or are not mentioned or alluded to at all in this brief summary or in the abstract. Although various embodiments may have been motivated by various deficiencies with the prior art, which may be discussed or alluded to in one or more places in the specification, the embodiments do not necessarily address any of these deficiencies. In other words, different embodiments may address different deficiencies that may be discussed in the specification. Some embodiments may only partially address some deficiencies or just one deficiency that may be discussed in the specification, and some embodiments may not address any of these deficiencies.
In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples, the one or more implementations are not limited to the examples depicted in the figures.
Systems and methods are provided for maintaining data stored in a data structure.
As used herein, the term multi-tenant database system refers to those systems in which various elements of hardware and software of the database system may be shared by one or more customers. For example, a given application server may simultaneously process requests for a great number of customers, and a given database table may store rows for a potentially much greater number of customers. As used herein, the term query plan refers to a set of steps used to access information in a database system.
Next, mechanisms and methods for providing and maintaining data stored in a data structure will be described with reference to example embodiments.
In one embodiment, the data structure may store group membership information, such as for each of a plurality of users that are members of the group. In another embodiment, the data structure may store content access control information, such as which content each group is permitted to access (and optionally which content a user is permitted to access where the user is given permission directly and not necessarily via a group).
Further, the first operation that is requested to be performed on the data structure may include any operation capable of being performed on at least a portion of the data stored in the data structure. For example, the first operation may include modifying the data, such as updating the data, removing the data from the data structure, etc. It should be noted that the request may be received in any context (e.g. from a user, from an application, etc.).
Additionally, as shown in operation 104, a portion of the data structure utilized for performing the first operation is identified. The portion of the data structure utilized for performing the first operation may include data within the data structure. For example, the portion of the data structure may include a particular string, value, etc. stored in the data structure.
In another embodiment, the portion of the data structure utilized for performing the first operation may include a substructure within the data structure on which the first operation may be performed. For example, the portion of the data structure may include at least one row, field, etc. of the data structure. Of course, however, the portion of the data structure utilized for performing the first operation may include any subpart of the data structure with respect to which the first operation may be performed.
Moreover, the aforementioned portion of the data structure may be identified in any desired manner. In one embodiment, the portion of the data structure may be identified based on a predetermination that the portion of the data structure is utilized for performing the first operation. For example, the operation may include a preconfigured operation, such that for each of a plurality of preconfigured operations, the portion of the data structure associated therewith may be predetermined.
In another embodiment, the portion of the data structure may be identified based on at least one parameter of the first operation. For example, the parameter may identify the portion of the data structure. Just by way of example, the first operation may indicate a row of the data structure on which it is to be performed.
Further, as shown in operation 106, during performance of the first operation, at least one second operation is blocked only with respect to the portion of the data structure. In the context of the present description, the second operation may include any operation capable of being performed with respect to the data structure. Thus, the second operation may be allowed to be performed on portions of the data structure not utilized by the first operation, but may be blocked from being performed on the portion of the data structure utilized by the first operation, the reasons for which will be set forth below.
In one embodiment, the second operation may include modifying data included in the portion of the data structure. As noted above, the first operation may include modifying a particular data in the data structure. To this end, a second operation which also modifies the same particular data may be blocked during performance of the first operation.
In another embodiment, the second operation may include applying a lock to the portion of the data structure, where the lock is utilized for blocking modifications to the portion of the data structure. For example, a first lock may be placed on the portion of the data structure in association with the first operation, for blocking other operations from being performed on the portion of the data structure during performance of the first operation. Thus, where the second operation includes application of a second lock on the portion of the data structure, the second operation, and therefore the second lock, may be blocked during performance of the first operation (e.g. while the first lock is held on the portion of the data structure). In this way, multiple locks may optionally be prevented from being held on the same portion of the data at the same time.
More examples of the types of operations (e.g. data modifications, types of locks, etc.) that may be blocked during performance of the first operation with respect to the associated portion of the data structure are provided in more detail below with respect to the description of
Thus, since the second operation is blocked only with respect to the portion of the data utilized for performing the first operation, the second operation may optionally be performed with respect to other portions of the data structure not necessarily utilized for performing the first operation. In this way, parallel operations may be performed on the data structure when such operations are being performed on different portions of data within the data structure, for maintaining the integrity of the data on which an operation is being performed while also enabling greater throughput of operations performed on the data structure.
As shown in decision 202, it is determined whether a request to perform an operation associated with a data structure is received. In one embodiment, the operation may include modifying a portion of the data structure. In another embodiment, the operation may include applying a lock to a portion of the data structure.
If it is determined that that a request to perform an operation associated with a data structure is not received, the method 200 continues to wait for such a request to be received. However, upon receipt of a request to perform an operation associated with a data structure, a portion of the data structure utilized for performing the operation is identified. Note operation 204. In the present embodiment, the portion of the data structure may include any specific data or substructure within the data structure on which the operation is to be performed.
Additionally, a lock to be placed on the portion of the data structure is identified, as shown in operation 206. As noted above, the operation may include placing the lock on the portion of the data structure, such that the lock may be placed on the portion of the data structure as a result of performance of the operation. In another embodiment (e.g. where the operation includes modifying data in the portion of the data structure), the lock may be placed on the portion of the data structure prior to or otherwise in conjunction with the operation being performed.
In one embodiment, identifying the lock may include identifying a type of lock to be placed on the portion of the data structure. For example, various types of operations may be predetermined to be associated with different types of locks. Thus, the type of the lock may be determined based on the type of the operation. Table 1 illustrates two types of locks which may be utilized for locking a portion of a data structure. Of course, it should be noted that the locks shown in Table 1 are set forth for illustrative purposed only, and thus should not be construed as limiting in any manner.
In another embodiment, identifying the lock may include identifying a specific lock from a pool of locks. For example, a plurality of locks (including shared and exclusive locks) may be provided for use (e.g. by a particular tenant of a multi-tenant on-demand database service), where each lock has a different unique name. In this way, identifying the lock may include identifying the name of the lock. As an option, various operations may be predetermined to be associated with different specific locks within the pool. Thus, the specific lock may be determined based on the operation.
Furthermore, as shown in operation 208, it is determined whether the lock to be placed on the portion of the data structure is allowed. In one embodiment, the determination may be based on whether the lock is currently in use by another operation. For example, where the specific lock is determined from the pool of locks, as described above, it may be determined that the specific lock is allowed if the specific lock is not already placed on any portion of the data structure. Similarly, it may be determined that the specific lock is not allowed if the specific lock is already placed on any portion of the data structure.
In another embodiment (e.g. where the specific lock is not already placed on any portion of the data structure), the determination may be based on whether another lock that is already in place or that is to be placed on the portion of the data structure prohibits the placement of the lock identified in operation 206. Thus, the allowability of the lock may be determined based on rules associated with locks. For example, if no other lock is currently placed on the portion of the data structure, it may be determined that the lock is allowed.
As another example, if the lock to be placed on the portion of the data structure is a shared lock, it may be determined that that the shared lock is allowed to be placed on the portion of the data structure if another shared lock is already placed on the portion of the data structure, such that the shared locks are placed on the portion of the data structure concurrently. As yet another example, if the lock to be placed on the portion of the data structure is either of a shared lock or exclusive lock, it may be determined that that the shared lock/exclusive lock is not allowed to be placed on the portion of the data structure if an exclusive lock is already placed on the portion of the data structure.
As shown, if it is determined that the lock is allowed, the lock is applied to only the portion of the data structure utilized for performing the first operation. Note operation 210. Thus, subsequent locks attempted to be placed on the portion of the data structure in association with other operations (which are subsequently requested and which utilize the portion of the data structure) may be conditionally blocked in accordance with the embodiments described above.
Furthermore, the operation is performed, as shown in operation 212. Optionally, upon completion of the operation, the lock may be removed from the portion of the data. If, however, it is determined in decision 208 that the lock is not allowed, the operation requested to be performed in association with the data structure is prevented. Note operation 214. For example, in the present embodiment, the operation may be blocked.
As shown in operation 302, a plurality of changes is applied to a first data structure. With respect to the present embodiment, the changes may include any modifications to data stored in the first data structure. For example, the changes may include updates, deletions, insertions, etc. applied to the first data structure.
In one embodiment, the first data structure may store policies. Each policy may be a statement linking subsets of different data. For example, the policies may include a first set of statements indicating members of each of a plurality of groups and a second set of statements indicating content accessible to each of the plurality of groups.
Additionally, as shown in operation 304, a second data structure storing data derived from the first data structure is identified. With respect to the present embodiment, the second data structure may include any data structure that is separate from the first data structure and which stores data derived from the first data structure. Such data may be derived from the first data structure by being calculated in dependence upon data stored in the first data structure.
For example, where the first data structure stores policies, as described above, the data stored in the second data structure that is derived from the first data structure may include a result of an evaluation of the policies. As another example, where the first data structure stores the exemplary policies noted above, the data stored in the second data structure that is derived from the first data structure may include a determination of content that is accessible to each of the members via membership of the member in at least one of the groups.
Just by way of illustration, policy A1 stored in the first data structure may include a statement that user A is a member of Group A. Additionally, policy A2 stored in the first data structure may include a statement that Group A is allowed to access content A. Accordingly, the data stored in the second data structure that is derived from the first data structure may include a result of an evaluation of policy A1 and policy A2. In the present example, such result stored in the second data structure may include a statement that user A is allowed to access content A (e.g. by virtue of the membership of user A in Group A and the permission given to Group A to access content A).
Still yet, as shown in operation 306, recalculation of the second data structure is performed after the application of the plurality of changes to the first data structure. It should be noted that the recalculation may include any operation performed with respect to the second data structure whereby the data stored in the second data structure is re-derived based on the data stored in the first data structure. For example, the recalculation of the second data structure may include re-evaluating data stored in the first data structure and storing a result of the reevaluation in the second data structure. With respect to the above described embodiment where the first data structure stores policies indicating group membership and content accessible to various groups, the data stored in the second data structure may be recalculated from the data stored in the first data structure by determining, based on the policies, content that is accessible to each of the members. Accordingly, where multiple changes have been made to the first data structure, as described above, the recalculation may take into account such changes, such that the data stored in the second data structure as a result of the recalculation may reflect the changes.
By recalculating the second data structure only after the application of the plurality of changes to the first data structure, the second data structure may only be recalculated after a group of changes have been made to the first data structure, thus separating the changes made to the first data structure from changes made to the second data structure. For example, the recalculation may be performed after the plurality of changes to the first data structure such that recalculation of the second data structure after each of the plurality of changes to the first data structure is avoided. Deferring the recalculation of the second data structure in the manner described above may reduce the amount of resources utilized by reducing a number of times the second data structure is recalculated.
As shown in operation 402, a plurality of changes is applied to a first data structure. Just by way of example, the changes may include updating a statement indicating which members are in a particular group, removing a group's permission to access a particular piece of content, etc. It should be noted that the changes may occur in conjunction with one another (e.g. may be dependent upon one another), or may be separate from one another. Furthermore, the changes may occur over any period of time, such as a predetermined period of time.
In one embodiment, the changes may be grouped over a particular period of time. For example, the changes may be stored in a queue prior to be made to the first data structure. Thus, upon the termination of the particular period of time, the changes may be made to the first data structure in sequence (e.g. and thus in a short period of time).
Additionally, a second data structure storing data derived from the first data structure is identified, as shown in operation 404. For example, the second data structure may store evaluations of the statements stored in the first data structure. Further, it is determined whether a request to recalculate the second data structure is received. Note decision 406.
In one embodiment, the request may be made periodically (e.g. at a predefined interval, at a predetermined time, etc.). In another embodiment, the request may be issued manually. If it is determined that a request to recalculate the second data structure has not been received, the method 400 continues to wait for such a request to be received.
However, in response to receipt of a request to recalculate the second data structure, a lock is applied to the first data structure to prevent additional changes to the first data structure. Note operation 408. In particular, the lock may prevent any changes from being made to the first data structure while the lock is held on the first data structure. Such lock may be utilized to ensure data integrity of the first data structure and the second data structure during recalculation of the second data structure (described below).
Still yet, the second data structure is recalculated, as shown in operation 410. Since the recalculation is performed after the application of the plurality of changes to the first data structure, the recalculation may serve to update the second data structure to reflect the changes made to the first data structure. Moreover, the lock on the first data structure is removed, as shown in operation 412. In this way, further changes may be made to the first data structure (e.g. and the second data structure recalculated again via the method 400 described above).
As shown in operation 502, resource utilization of a system is determined to be below a predetermined threshold. In the present embodiment, the resource utilization may include any use of (e.g. load on) a resource of the system, where the system may include a server, etc. For example, the resource may include a data structure, processor [e.g. central processing unit (CPU)], etc.
Further, data stored in a data structure of the system is compared to expected data, in response to the determination. Note operation 504. Accordingly, the comparison may only be performed in response to the determination that the resource utilization of the system is below the predetermined threshold. Thus, it should be noted that the resource utilization of the system may be monitored for making the aforementioned determination, and that as a result of such monitoring the comparison may also be terminated in response to a subsequent determination that the resource utilization of the system is above the predetermined threshold.
In one embodiment, the expected data may include data which is expected to be present in the data structure as a result of at least one change made to the data structure. For example, the data stored in the data structure may be changed as a result of at least one operation performed on the data, and the expected data may include resultant data expected from the performance of the at least one operation on the data. To this end, the expected data may be compared to the actual data stored in the data structure.
In one example, if all rows of the data structure are expected to not have an access level of READ due to a default READ permission placed with respect to all of the rows, then the expected data may include rows of the data structure not having a field indicating an access level of READ. To perform the aforementioned comparison with respect to the present example, the data structure may be queried to find all rows indicating an access level of READ, where such rows are the actual data in the data structure. Of course, it should be noted that the comparison may be performed in any desired manner.
Still yet, as shown in operation 506, at least one error in the data stored in the data structure is identified, based on the comparison. For example, in the present embodiment, the error may be identified in response to the comparison indicating that the expected data is different from the data stored in the data structure. Similarly, if the actual data matches the expected data, as determined based on the comparison, an error may not necessarily be identified.
To this end, errors in the data structure of the system may be identified only when the resource utilization of the system is below the predetermined threshold. This may prevent the identification of errors, and thus the consumption of resources to identify such errors, from impacting other operations of the system. Furthermore, by automatically performing the comparison to identify the errors when the resource utilization of the system is below the predetermined threshold, the errors may be identified proactively, and thus prior to an administrator or any other user of the data structure noticing the errors.
It should be noted that the present method 600 may be carried out separately for each customer of a multi-tenant on-demand database system (as described below with reference to
As shown in decision 602, it is determined whether utilization of a resource of a system is below a predetermined threshold. The determination may be made with respect to a single resource, or optionally a plurality of resources of the system. If it is determined that the system resource utilization is not below the predetermined threshold, the method 600 continues to wait for a determination that the system resource utilization is below the predetermined threshold.
However, once it is determined that the system resource utilization is below the predetermined threshold, data on the system that is to be analyzed is identified. Note operation 604. In one embodiment, the data may include data which has been changed. In another embodiment, the data may include data within a data structure. More information regarding the analysis to be performed is described below with reference to the comparison of the data to expected data.
Additionally, data expected to be stored on the system is identified, as shown in operation 606. With respect to the present embodiment, the data expected to be stored on the system may include any data expected as a result of a change to the data stored on the system. Just by way of example, if a user is added to a group with access to a particular piece of content, the expected data would be that the user has access to the particular piece of content.
Further, the data identified from the system is compared with the expected data, as shown in operation 608. In the present embodiment, the comparison may determine whether the data identified from the system matches the expected data. If it is determined that the data identified from the system matches the expected data, the method 600 is terminated. Specifically, such a determination may indicate that any change made to the data had an expected result (e.g. that the change was implemented as expected).
If, however, it is determined that the data identified from the system does not match the expected data, an administrator is notified and the error is fixed. Note operation 612. For example, in the present embodiment, a determination that the data identified from the system does not match the expected data may indicate that any change made to the data had an unexpected result (e.g. that the change was not necessarily implemented as expected).
It should be noted that the notification sent to the administrator may include any information indicating that the data on the system is not as expected. For example, the notification may generally indicate that that the data on the system is not as expected (for allowing the administrator to manually determine a source of the unexpected data). Of course, as another option, the notification may include a specific reference to a portion of the data that is unexpected (i.e. the error), which may be determined as described below.
Furthermore, as noted above, the error is fixed. In one embodiment, each change made to the data may be logged in a change log. For example, a time of the change, a type of the change, the specific data that was changed, etc. may be logged. In addition, each execution of the method 600 may be logged in an execution log, including a time of such execution.
Thus, if unexpected data is found as a result of a particular execution, all changes made between that execution and the execution immediately prior may be identified from the aforementioned change log (e.g. based on the times of the changes included in the change log that are between the time of the latest execution and the immediately prior execution included in the execution log). The identified changes may then be analyzed to determine which one resulted in the unexpected data, and the error may be fixed based on the change that was determined to be the source of the error. To this end, identified errors may be corrected. Moreover, the method 600 may be repeated with respect to the same data, in response to the correction of the errors, for validating that the errors were corrected.
Environment 710 is an environment in which an on-demand database service exists. User system 712 may be any machine or system that is used by a user to access a database user system. For example, any of user systems 712 can be a handheld computing device, a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network of computing devices. As illustrated in
An on-demand database service, such as system 716, is a database system that is made available to outside users that do not need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system, but instead may be available for their use when the users need the database system (e.g., on the demand of the users). Some on-demand database services may store information from one or more tenants stored into tables of a common database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS). Accordingly, “on-demand database service 716” and “system 716” will be used interchangeably herein. A database image may include one or more database objects. A relational database management system (RDMS) or the equivalent may execute storage and retrieval of information against the database object(s). Application platform 718 may be a framework that allows the applications of system 716 to run, such as the hardware and/or software, e.g., the operating system. In an embodiment, on-demand database service 716 may include an application platform 718 that enables creation, managing and executing one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand database service, users accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 712, or third party application developers accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 712.
The users of user systems 712 may differ in their respective capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 712 might be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a particular user system 712 to interact with system 716, that user system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However, while an administrator is using that user system to interact with system 716, that user system has the capacities allotted to that administrator. In systems with a hierarchical role model, users at one permission level may have access to applications, data, and database information accessible by a lower permission level user, but may not have access to certain applications, database information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with regard to accessing and modifying application and database information, depending on a user's security or permission level.
Network 714 is any network or combination of networks of devices that communicate with one another. For example, network 714 can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network), WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network, point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub network, or other appropriate configuration. As the most common type of computer network in current use is a TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol) network, such as the global internetwork of networks often referred to as the “Internet” with a capital “I,” that network will be used in many of the examples herein. However, it should be understood that the networks that the one or more implementations might use are not so limited, although TCP/IP is a frequently implemented protocol.
User systems 712 might communicate with system 716 using TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc. In an example where HTTP is used, user system 712 might include an HTTP client commonly referred to as a “browser” for sending and receiving HTTP messages to and from an HTTP server at system 716. Such an HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network interface between system 716 and network 714, but other techniques might be used as well or instead. In some implementations, the interface between system 716 and network 714 includes load sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests evenly over a plurality of servers. At least as for the users that are accessing that server, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS' data; however, other alternative configurations may be used instead.
In one embodiment, system 716, shown in
One arrangement for elements of system 716 is shown in
Several elements in the system shown in
According to one embodiment, each user system 712 and all of its components are operator configurable using applications, such as a browser, including computer code run using a central processing unit such as an Intel Pentium® processor or the like. Similarly, system 716 (and additional instances of an MTS, where more than one is present) and all of their components might be operator configurable using application(s) including computer code to run using a central processing unit such as processor system 717, which may include an Intel Pentium® processor or the like, and/or multiple processor units. A computer program product embodiment includes a machine-readable storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the embodiments described herein. Computer code for operating and configuring system 716 to intercommunicate and to process webpages, applications and other data and media content as described herein are preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data. Additionally, the entire program code, or portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will also be appreciated that computer code for implementing embodiments can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, Java™, JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used. (Java™ is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.).
According to one embodiment, each system 716 is configured to provide webpages, forms, applications, data and media content to user (client) systems 712 to support the access by user systems 712 as tenants of system 716. As such, system 716 provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate unless the data is shared. If more than one MTS is used, they may be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city B). As used herein, each MTS could include one or more logically and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across one or more geographic locations. Additionally, the term “server” is meant to include a computer system, including processing hardware and process space(s), and an associated storage system and database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in the art. It should also be understood that “server system” and “server” are often used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the database object described herein can be implemented as single databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database or storage network and associated processing intelligence.
User system 712, network 714, system 716, tenant data storage 722, and system data storage 724 were discussed above in
Application platform 718 includes an application setup mechanism 838 that supports application developers' creation and management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into tenant data storage 722 by save routines 836 for execution by subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 804 managed by tenant management process 810 for example. Invocations to such applications may be coded using PU/SOQL 834 that provides a programming language style interface extension to API 832. A detailed description of some PL/SOQL language embodiments is discussed in commonly owned co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/828,192 entitled. PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTENDING APIS TO EXECUTE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATABASE APIS, by Craig Weissman, filed Oct. 4, 2006, which is incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be detected by one or more system processes, which manages retrieving application metadata 816 for the subscriber making the invocation and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual machine.
Each application server 800 may be communicably coupled to database systems, e.g., having access to system data 725 and tenant data 723, via a different network connection. For example, one application server 8001 might be coupled via the network 714 (e.g., the Internet), another application server 800N-1 might be coupled via a direct network link, and another application server 800N might be coupled by yet a different network connection. Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) are typical protocols for communicating between application servers 800 and the database system. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that other transport protocols may be used to optimize the system depending on the network interconnect used.
In certain embodiments, each application server 800 is configured to handle requests for any user associated with any organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a user and/or organization to a specific application server 800. In one embodiment, therefore, an interface system implementing a load balancing function (e.g., an F5 Big-IP load balancer) is communicably coupled between the application servers 800 and the user systems 712 to distribute requests to the application servers 800. In one embodiment, the load balancer uses a least connections algorithm to route user requests to the application servers 800. Other examples of load balancing algorithms, such as round robin and observed response time, also can be used. For example, in certain embodiments, three consecutive requests from the same user could hit three different application servers 800, and three requests from different users could hit the same application server 800. In this manner, system 716 is multi-tenant, wherein system 716 handles storage of, and access to, different objects, data and applications across disparate users and organizations.
As an example of storage, one tenant might be a company that employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 716 to manage their sales process. Thus, a user might maintain contact data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 722). In an example of a MTS arrangement, since all of the data and the applications to access, view, modify, report, transmit, calculate, etc., can be maintained and accessed by a user system having nothing more than network access, the user can manage his or her sales efforts and cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the lobby.
While each user's data might be separate from other users' data regardless of the employers of each user, some data might be organization-wide data shared or accessible by a plurality of users or all of the users for a given organization that is a tenant. Thus, there might be some data structures managed by system 716 that are allocated at the tenant level while other data structures might be managed at the user level. Because an MTS might support multiple tenants including possible competitors, the MTS should have security protocols that keep data, applications, and application use separate. Also, because many tenants may opt for access to an MTS rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and backup are additional functions that may be implemented in the MTS. In addition to user-specific data and tenant specific data, system 716 might also maintain system level data usable by multiple tenants or other data. Such system level data might include industry reports, news, postings, and the like that are sharable among tenants.
In certain embodiments, user systems 712 (which may be client systems) communicate with application servers 800 to request and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 716 that may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 722 and/or system data storage 724. System 716 (e.g., an application server 800 in system 716) automatically generates one or more SQL statements (e.g., one or more SQL queries) that are designed to access the desired information. System data storage 724 may generate query plans to access the requested data from the database.
Each database can generally be viewed as a collection of objects, such as a set of logical tables, containing data fitted into predefined categories. A “table” is one representation of a data object, and may be used herein to simplify the conceptual description of objects and custom objects. It should be understood that “table” and “object” may be used interchangeably herein. Each table generally contains one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an instance of data for each category defined by the fields. For example, a CRM database may include a table that describes a customer with fields for basic contact information such as name, address, phone number, fax number, etc. Another table might describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as customer, product, sale price, date, etc. In some multi-tenant database systems, standard entity tables might be provided for use by all tenants. For CRM database applications, such standard entities might include tables for Account, Contact, Lead, and Opportunity data, each containing pre-defined fields. It should be understood that the word “entity” may also be used interchangeably herein with “object” and “table”.
In some multi-tenant database systems, tenants may be allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,161, filed Apr. 2, 2004, entitled “Custom Entities and Fields in a Multi-Tenant Database System”, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, teaches systems and methods for creating custom objects as well as customizing standard objects in a multi-tenant database system. In certain embodiments, for example, all custom entity data rows are stored in a single multi-tenant physical table, which may contain multiple logical tables per organization. It is transparent to customers that their multiple “tables” are in fact stored in one large table or that their data may be stored in the same table as the data of other customers.
While one or more implementations have been described by way of example and in terms of the specific embodiments, it is to be understood that one or more implementations are not limited to the disclosed embodiments. To the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements as would be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
This application claims the benefit of: U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/319,787, entitled “Granular Locking During Group Membership Maintenance,” by Jain et al., filed Mar. 31, 2010 (Attorney Docket No. SFC1P103+/293PROV); U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/329,040, entitled “Methods And Systems For Performing Group Level Scrutiny In A Multi-Tenant Database Environment,” by Yongsheng Wu, filed Apr. 28, 2010 (Attorney Docket No. SFC1P128+/338PROV); and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/329,043, entitled “Methods And Systems For Deferring Group Membership And Access Calculation During Admin Operations In A Multi-Tenant Database Environment,” by Yancey et al., filed Apr. 28, 2010 (Attorney Docket No. SFC1P129+/339PROV), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61329040 | Apr 2010 | US | |
| 61329043 | Apr 2010 | US | |
| 61319787 | Mar 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15707400 | Sep 2017 | US |
| Child | 17473833 | US | |
| Parent | 12977012 | Dec 2010 | US |
| Child | 15707400 | US |
