The present invention relates to application management, and more particularly to interfacing a plurality of applications.
In the space of just a few years, the Internet—because it provides access to information, and the ability to publish information, in revolutionary ways—has emerged from relative obscurity to international prominence. Whereas in general an internet is a network of networks, the Internet is a global collection of interconnected local, mid-level, and wide-area networks that use the Internet Protocol (IP) as the network layer protocol. Whereas the Internet embraces many local- and wide-area networks, a given local- or wide-area network may or may not form part of the Internet.
As the Internet and its underlying technologies have become increasingly familiar, attention has become focused on Internet security and computer network security in general. With unprecedented access to information has also come unprecedented opportunities to gain unauthorized access to data, change data, destroy data, make unauthorized use of computer resources, interfere with the intended use of computer resources, etc. As experience has shown, the frontier of cyberspace has its share of scofflaws, resulting in increased efforts to protect the data, resources, and reputations of those embracing intranets and the Internet.
Security threats have evolved significantly with the increased popularity of the Internet. Advanced hybrid threats have been designed to attack systems on multiple fronts, sometimes searching for vulnerabilities until one is found. New threats also attempt to attack security technology itself.
Traditional consumer security software suites often include a plurality of various applications such as an anti-virus application, a firewall application, etc. In use, each application works to protect against at least one of the aforementioned threats. Together, the applications provide the comprehensive protection required in modern computing and networking environments.
As the security threats become more and more complex, however, the number of applications required to combat the threats becomes greater. With each application carrying out its own functionality and reporting schemes, an administrator or user can easily become overwhelmed with security management.
A system, method and computer program product are provided for managing a plurality of applications via a single interface. It is initially identified as to which of a plurality of applications are installed on a computer. A status of each of the applications is then presented via a single graphical user interface.
In one embodiment, the identifying may include registering the applications upon the installation thereof. It may then be determined that one of the applications is not installed when such application is not registered.
In another embodiment, the applications may include an anti-virus application, a firewall application, a privacy service application, an anti-spam application, and/or a utilities application.
In still another embodiment, the single graphical user interface may include a list of the applications. Still yet, the single graphical user interface may include a plurality of status indicators adjacent to each of the applications in the list. Each status indicator may indicate whether the corresponding application is installed. Moreover, each status indicator may indicate whether the corresponding application is enabled. Still yet, each status indicator may indicate whether a subscription associated with the corresponding application is expired. As an option, each status indicator may be color coded.
Another system, method and computer program product are provided for managing a plurality of applications via a single interface. A status of a plurality of applications installed on a computer may initially be identified. Moreover, a visual indication as to the status of each of the applications may be displayed via a single graphical user interface.
In one aspect of the present embodiment, the status may include installed, not installed, expired, enabled, disabled, etc. Still yet, the visual indication may include a textual description of the status, a color coded representation of the status, and/or an icon representing the status.
Still another system, method and computer program product are provided for managing a plurality of applications. It is initially identified as to which of a plurality of applications are installed on a computer. A user is then allowed access to each of the applications via a single graphical user interface.
In one aspect of the present embodiment, the graphical user interface may include a home page for displaying a visual indication as to the status of each of the applications. Still yet, the graphical user interface may include a plurality of selection icons for allowing access to a plurality of windows associated with each of the applications. Optionally, such windows may each include access to functionality associated with the corresponding one of the applications.
Still another system, method and computer program product are provided for tailoring a multi-application managing interface. To accomplish this, provided is a plurality of fields associated with a plurality of aspects of a multi-application managing interface. Such fields are subsequently filled with content tailored to an entity including a multiplicity of computers each equipped with the multi-application managing interface. Thus, the multi-application managing interface may be displayed on the computers with the content.
Still another system, method and computer program product are provided for selling application-services via a single interface. Initially, a status of a plurality of applications installed on a computer is identified. The status of each of the applications is then presented via a single graphical user interface. A purchase link is conditionally displayed with the status based on the status of the applications on the computer. Such purchase link may be capable of being utilized by a user of the computer to purchase a service associated with the applications via the network.
Coupled to the networks 102 are data server computers 104 which are capable of communicating over the networks 102. Also coupled to the networks 102 and the data server computers 104 is a plurality of end user computers 106. In order to facilitate communication among the networks 102, at least one gateway or router 108 is optionally coupled therebetween. It should be noted that each of the foregoing network devices as well as any other unillustrated devices may be interconnected by way of a plurality of network segments.
The workstation shown in
The workstation may have resident thereon any desired operating system. It will be appreciated that a preferred embodiment may also be implemented on platforms and operating systems other than those mentioned. A preferred embodiment may be written using JAVA, C, and/or C++ language, or other programming languages, along with an object oriented programming methodology. Object oriented programming (OOP) has become increasingly used to develop complex applications.
Our course, the various embodiments set forth herein may be implemented utilizing hardware, software, or any desired combination thereof. For that matter, any type of logic may be utilized which is capable of implementing the various functionality set forth herein.
As shown, included is a plurality of applications 301. In the context of the present description, such applications 301 may include any type of application program or computer code. For example, the applications 301 may optionally be security related. Of course, the applications 301 may be related to any other aspects such as business, maintenance, entertainment, etc. In any case, the applications may be related by the virtue of being associated with a similar aspect, purpose, etc.
In the security context, the applications 301 may include an anti-virus application 302, a firewall application 304, a privacy service application 308, an anti-spam application 306, and any other related application 310 (i.e. a utilities application, etc.).
In use, the anti-virus application 302 may be capable of scanning for viruses or other malicious code by comparing virus signature files with data located in memory or being transmitted via a network; and taking any appropriate response (i.e. quarantine data, delete data, clean data, alert user, etc.). Moreover, the firewall application 304 may be capable of blocking or alerting a user of accesses to a computer based on a predetermined set of rules or policies.
Still yet, the privacy service application 308 may be capable of protecting personal information on a computer and preventing the same from being shared. Still yet, the privacy service application 308 may be capable of preventing certain users from accessing predetermined content on a network such as the Internet. Moreover, the anti-spam application 306 may be capable of filtering electronic mail messages based on a predetermined rule set to prevent the receipt (or delivery) of unwanted e-mail.
As mentioned earlier, any other related application 310 may be included in the group of applications 301. For example, a utilities application may be included for executing various maintenance tasks associated with a computer (i.e. cleaning files, optimizing memory, etc.).
Further provided in combination with the applications 301 of the system 300 is an interface 312. In use, such interface 312 may include any specific method, technique or protocol by which an application program can communicate with an operating system or another application. In one embodiment, such interface 312 may include an application program interface.
The interface 312 may further include a graphical user interface for allowing access to the various applications 301. Such graphical user interface may further be used for indicating a status of the applications 301. More information relating to such graphical user interface will be set forth hereinafter in greater detail.
In operation 402, it is determined which of a plurality of applications are installed on a computer. The identification of the installed applications may be carried out in any desired manner. For example, a simple scan of the computer may be initiated. Moreover, such identification may involve the registration of the applications upon the installation thereof. It may then be determined that one of the applications is installed or not based on whether such application is registered. Optionally, such registration may involve an application program interface such as that mentioned during reference to
Next, in operation 404, a status of each of the applications is presented via a single graphical user interface. Such single graphical user interface may take any desired form capable of simultaneously conveying a status of each of the applications. As an option, such status may be displayed via a home page of the single graphical user interface. Such home page may include a “main” page or interface associated with the graphical user interface. More information regarding an exemplary single graphical user interface that may be used in the context of the present method 400 will be set forth during reference to subsequent figures.
In operation 406, a plurality of selection icons may be displayed, where the selection icons are associated with a plurality of windows. Such windows may each correspond with one of the applications, for reasons that will soon become apparent. In the present description, such selection icons may include any visual entity that is displayed and is capable of being selected by a user. Moreover, such windows may include any frame, portion, subset, or page associated with the graphical user interface and corresponding with one of the applications.
It is then determined in decision 408 whether one of the selection icons has been selected by a user. Upon the selection of the corresponding selection icon, a user is allowed to access one of the windows. Each of the windows may include access to functionality associated with the corresponding application. Thus, a user is provided access to such functionality conveniently from the graphical user interface. Note operation 410.
To allow access to each of the applications via the single graphical user interface 500, the graphical user interface may include a home page 512 and a plurality of selection icons 514 for allowing access to a plurality of windows (not shown) associated with each of the applications. Optionally, such windows may each include access to functionality associated with the corresponding one of the related applications. More information relating to such application-specific windows will be set forth in greater detail during reference to subsequent figures.
In use, the home page 512 may be adapted for displaying a visual indication as to the status of each of the applications, along with various other information. For example, a security index 516 may be provided for indicating a level of risk associated with various aspects (i.e. security aspects) of a computer or networking environment. More information relating to such security index 516 will be set forth in greater detail during reference to
To convey the status of each of the applications, the home page 512 of the single graphical user interface 500 may include a list 502 of a plurality of applications 504. Still yet, the single graphical user interface 500 may include a plurality of status indicators 506 adjacent to each of the applications 504 in the list 502.
Each status indicator 506 may indicate whether the corresponding application is installed. Moreover, each status indicator 506 may indicate whether the corresponding application is enabled. Still yet, each status indicator 506 may indicate whether a subscription associated with the corresponding application is expired. While this is shown to be accomplished using text, it should be noted that such status may be conveyed in any desired manner. As an option, each status indicator 506 may be color coded. For example, an icon may be included as a status indicator 506, as shown. In use, such icon may exhibit a red color to reflect the fact that an application is not installed, disabled or expired (i.e. security vulnerability present); and a green color may indicate that the application is installed and/or running (i.e. protection present). Still yet, an amber color may be used to reflect caution or some intermediate degree of vulnerability.
Of course, the status indicator 506 may include any combination of textual, graphic, numeric visuals that indicates a status of the applications 504. Moreover, such status may include installed, not installed, expired, enabled, disabled, version number or any other conceivable state of the applications.
As shown, the anti-virus application window 600 may include a control frame 602 including an enable/disable icon 604 for selectively enabling/disabling the anti-virus application by a simple mouse-click or the like. Further provided in such control frame 602 are an application-specific help icon 606 and an application-specific information icon 608. Similar to the home page of
In addition to the previous features, the anti-virus application window 600 may include a scan icon 630 for scanning data on the computer. A rescue disk icon 632 is provided for creating a rescue disk capable of rebooting a computer after being infected by a virus. Still yet, a quarantine icon 634 is provided for situating an allegedly or known to be infected file in a quarantine area. Further provided is a configure icon 636 for modifying various options associated with the anti-virus application. A virus map icon 638 may be used to view concentrations of infected data and sources of viruses on a world map. A virus information icon 640 may be used to locate general information regarding various viruses.
As shown, the firewall application window 700 may include a control frame 702 including an enable/disable icon 704 for selectively enabling/disabling the firewall application by a simple mouse-click or the like. Further provided in such control frame 702 are an application-specific help icon 706 and an application-specific information icon 708. Similar to the home page of
In addition to the previous features, the firewall application window 700 may include a firewall summary icon 730 for viewing a non-technical report of firewall activity. Moreover, an event log icon 732 may be provided for viewing a technical highly-detailed report of the firewall activity. An attack may be traced on a map utilizing a track icon 734. Still yet, the firewall application may be configured and tested utilizing a firewall configure icon 736 and firewall test icon 738, respectively.
As shown, the privacy service application window 800 may include a control frame 802 including an enable/disable icon 804 for selectively enabling/disabling the privacy service application by a simple mouse-click or the like. Further provided in such control frame 802 are an application-specific help icon 806 and an application-specific information icon 808. Similar to the home page of
The privacy service application window 800 may further include a sign out icon 830 for signing out a current user so that a next user can use a computer. This is important since the privacy service application may selectively block content based on a user profile. Moreover, a report icon 832 may be included to report Internet-related crimes via a network. Still yet, the privacy service application may be configured utilizing a configure icon 834. A privacy information icon 836 may be used to obtain additional information relating to various privacy-related subjects (i.e. On-line chatting, etc.).
As shown, the anti-spam application window 900 may include a control frame 902 including an enable/disable icon 804 for selectively enabling/disabling the anti-spam application by a simple mouse-click or the like. Further provided in such control frame 902 are an application-specific help icon 906 and an application-specific information icon 908. Similar to the home page of
Moreover, the anti-spam application window 900 may further include a blocked e-mail icon 930 adapted for allowing a user to view e-mail that has been blocked by the anti-spam application. As an option, the anti-spam application may be configured utilizing a configure icon 932.
In operation 1001, a status of at least one security application is identified. In one embodiment, the status of a plurality of applications may be identified. As set forth before, the status may include installed, not installed, expired, enabled, disabled, version number, update status or any other conceivable state of each application.
Next, in operation 1002, an individual index representative of a degree of risk associated with the status of each security application is calculated. Again, one individual index may be calculated for each security application or, in other words, a plurality of indices may be calculated for multiple security applications.
In one embodiment, each individual index may be calculated using a plurality of aspects of the status of the associated security application. Just by way of example, a signature file of the security application and/or a version of the security application may be used to calculate the individual index. More information regarding exemplary techniques of calculating the indices will be set forth in greater detail during reference to
As an option, each index may include a number between one (1) and ten (10). Of course, each index may include any alphanumeric range or merely include symbols, etc.
Instead of or in addition to calculating the individual index in operation 1002, an overall index may be calculated which is representative of a degree of risk associated with the collective status of the security applications. Note operation 1004. In one embodiment, such calculation may include a weighted average of the individual indices associated with each of the security applications.
In operation 1006, each individual index and/or the overall index are displayed. Of course, such display may be accomplished in any desired manner. Just by way of example, the indices may be displayed alphanumerically, graphically, utilizing a bar-graph, utilizing a color coding, etc. As an option, the color coding may correlate with the degree of risk associated with the status, as will soon become apparent during the description of the exemplary interface of the following figure.
As shown, two versions 1102, 1104 of the graphical user interface 1100 are shown to reflect different statuses of the various applications associated therewith. Included with the graphical user interface 1100 is a plurality of bar graphs 1106 each associated with a corresponding application. The size of each bar graph 1106 is commensurate with a numerical index 1108 associated therewith, and optionally positioned adjacent thereto.
Moreover, the bar graphs 1106 may be color-coded. Specifically, the color of each bar graph 1106 may be based on the associated numerical index 1108. Just by way of example, each bar graph 1106 may include a red color upon the numerical index 1108 falling below a predetermined numerical index threshold, thus representing a high degree of risk associated with the current status of the associated application. Conversely, each bar graph 1106 may include a green color upon the numerical index 1108 rising above a predetermined numerical index threshold, thus representing a low degree of risk associated with the current status of the associated application.
As shown in
In one embodiment, an index associated with the status of an anti-virus security application may reflect a signature file of the anti-virus security application and/or a version of the anti-virus security application. Optionally, such index may be calculated using a weighted average of a plurality of aspects of the anti-virus security application including the signature file of the anti-virus security application and the version of the anti-virus security application.
In another embodiment where the index is associated with the status of a firewall security application, the index may reflect a version of the firewall security application. Similarly, in still another embodiment where the index is associated with the status of a privacy service security application, the index may reflect a version of the privacy service security application.
In yet another embodiment where the index includes an overall index reflecting a plurality of security applications, such overall index may be calculated using a weighted average of a plurality of separate indices associated with each of the security applications.
With continuing reference to
Appendix A sets forth a detailed exemplary technical specification for calculating and presenting the security indices set forth in
Optionally, additional information relating to the status may be displayed upon the selection of the appropriate displayed index 1106. For example, a window associated with the appropriate application (see, for example,
Initially, in operation 1202, a security alert is generated including information relating to a security event utilizing a server. The security alert may take any desired format (i.e. HTML, XML, etc.) capable of being transmitted via a network and eventually displayed on a user computer. Moreover, the information may include any data relevant to the security event. Table 1 illustrates some exemplary information that may be included with the security alert. Of course, such information is set forth for illustrative purposes only, and should not be construed as limiting in any manner.
It should be noted that the foregoing alert status may be generated in any desired manner. For example, it may be gleaned from an organization such as the Anti-Virus Emergency Response Team (AVERT) administered by NETWORK ASSOCIATES, INC®.
Thus, the information may include a level of the security alert. Such level of the security alert may, in turn, reflect a level of risk associated with the security event. Moreover, the information may include at least one proposed user action relating to the security event. For example, such proposed user action may involve obtaining more information relating to the security event and/or obtaining protection from the security event. Further, the information may include a response automatically carried out in reaction to the security event. For example, such response may include scanning a computer, scanning a file, cleaning a file, and/or blocking access to a computer. Still yet, the information may simply include a description of the security event.
Next, in operation 1204, the security alert is pushed from the server to a plurality of user computers via a network such as the Internet. In the context of the present description, such pushing may include any technique where the server initiates the delivery of the security alert to the user computers.
It should be noted that the foregoing pushing may be accomplished in a variety of foreseeable ways. Just by way of example, the security alert pushed from the server to the user computers may actually come as the result of a programmed request from the user computers. That is, a client program may be used to facilitate such pushed security alerts. This program may further capture a user profile for reasons that will soon become apparent.
Still yet, the pushing may include a simple broadcasting of the security alert. In this case, the security alert may be pushed to the user computers that have access to a particular channel or frequency. Broadcast may (but not always) involve a continuous flow of information.
As mentioned earlier, a user profile may be obtained during the course of the present method 1200. In particular, in operation 1206, a status of security applications on the computer may be identified. Such user profile may include data relating to a security application installed on a computer. For example, the status may indicate whether the security application is installed, enabled, etc. Also, the status may indicate whether a subscription associated with the security application is expired.
The specific profile identified in operation 1206 may, in turn, be used to conditionally display the information of the security alert based on the status of the security application(s) on the computer. Note operation 1208.
For example, the security alert may include a plethora of user options such as updating a particular security application, etc. However, if upon delivery of the security alert, it may be determined that the particular security application is not installed, expired, etc. In such case, an option to obtain the security application may be displayed, as opposed to an option to obtain an update.
Thus, in one embodiment, a large amount of information associated with the security alert may be downloaded to accommodate the numerous statuses associated with different computers. This may be feasible, for example, since large amounts of HTML information may be efficiently transmitted over a network such as the Internet. Logic (i.e. an application program interface, plug-in, etc.) may then be used to parse the large amount of information into a subset which is to be displayed based on the status of the security applications. Of course, some of such logic may conceivably be carried out on the server such that the alerts are tailored prior to being pushed.
In any case, the security alert may be displayed in a front most window of a user interface of the computers. In the present description, such a window may include any frame, portion, etc. of the user interface. By virtue of the aforementioned pushing, such display may be carried out in an automatic fashion, thus alerting users as soon as possible. One exemplary security alert will be set forth in greater detail during reference to
As shown, the graphical user interface 1300 includes a front most window 1304 which is automatically displayed over a background window 1302 that was running at the time the pushed security alert was received. Optionally, the front most window 1304 may be moved about the background window 1302 while a user decides how to react to the security alert.
Still yet, the user may continue work in the background window 1302 while the front most window 1304 is maintained in the foreground. Moreover, this foreground status of the front most window 1304 may be maintained despite the background window 1302 being changed as a result of the user changing applications, etc. As an option, the front most window 1304 may stay in the foreground until the user selects one of the options set forth in the security alert. More information regarding the design of a specific security alert will be set forth during reference to
As shown, the security alert 1400 may include a square or rectangular window with a first portion 1402 including a description 1404 of the security event. As shown, such description includes an alert level associated with the security event. Again, such description and alert level may be pushed as part of the information corresponding with the security alert 1400.
Further provided is a second portion 1406 including a number of proposed response options displayed to the user based on the profile of the user (i.e. status of the applications on the computer, etc.). Such response options may be carried out by the selection thereof by a user utilizing a mouse-click or the like. While this may be accomplished in any desired manner, one exemplary method may include the technique set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,266,774 entitled “Method and system for securing, managing or optimizing a personal computer,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
It should be noted that the security alert shown in
Moreover, a status of security applications on the computer may be identified upon the receipt of a security alert like that shown in
As an option, the security alert 1400 may be color-coded to reflect a level of severity associated with the alert. For example, red may reflect a high severity (i.e. including security alerts), blue may reflect a medium severity (i.e. including application tasks), and green may reflect a low severity (i.e. including application responses, marketing or general information).
As shown, a plurality of purchase links 1502 is conditionally displayed based on the status of the related applications on the computer. Such purchase link may be capable of being utilized by a user of the computer to purchase a service associated with the related applications via the network.
As shown, the graphical user interface 1600 includes a field for a specific entity logo 1602 using the present system. Moreover, various tailored user options 1604 are provided to accommodate the specific needs of the entity. Also, the various selection icons 1606 may be selectively displayed based on whether the applications are being used by the entity.
To accomplish this, a plurality of fields associated with such aspects of the multi-application managing interface may be made available to a desirer or administrator. In one embodiment, such fields may be provided via a management/designer/programmer interface or the like. Such fields are subsequently filled with content tailored to an entity (i.e. a specific company) including a multiplicity of computers each equipped the multi-application managing interface. Thus, the multi-application managing interface may be displayed on the computers with the content.
Optionally, a data structure may be provided for tailoring a multi-application managing interface. Included with the data structure is a map object for mapping a plurality of fields with content tailored to an entity including a multiplicity of computers each including a multi-application managing interface. Such fields are associated with a plurality of aspects of the multi-application managing interface.
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. For example, any of the network elements may employ any of the desired functionality set forth hereinabove. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/855,941, filed Sep. 14, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/319,288 filed on Dec. 13, 2002, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4899136 | Beard et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5121430 | Ganzer et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5333256 | Green et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5657460 | Egan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5870543 | Ronning | Feb 1999 | A |
5956481 | Walsh et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970474 | LeRoy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991881 | Conklin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6035423 | Hodges et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088804 | Hill et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6205552 | Fudge | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6266774 | Sampath et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269456 | Hodges et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282709 | Reha et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298445 | Shostack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304975 | Shipley | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327594 | Van Huben et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329904 | Lamb | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357008 | Nachenberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6460142 | Colvin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493871 | McGuire et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535227 | Fox et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553378 | Eschelbeck | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567808 | Eschelbeck et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6704874 | Porras et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711615 | Porras et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715083 | Tovander | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6785732 | Bates et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6816878 | Zimmers et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6871214 | Parsons et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6894793 | Roosen et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6941467 | Judge et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948169 | Amro et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952779 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6966059 | Shetty et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976251 | Meyerson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980927 | Tracy et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986059 | England et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989715 | Yin | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007301 | Crosbie et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010696 | Cambridge et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7080000 | Cambridge | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7096215 | Bates et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114183 | Joiner | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7127743 | Khanolkar et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7134141 | Crosbie et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137145 | Gleichauf | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7174566 | Yadav | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181519 | Pillai et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7233781 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7305709 | Lymer et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7308697 | Jerding et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7342581 | Vinberg | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353229 | Vilcauskas, Jr. et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7434177 | Ording et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7444679 | Tarquini et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7555776 | Lymer et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7584403 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599856 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606821 | Leahy et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624450 | Lymer et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7640434 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7882193 | Aronson et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7921459 | Houston et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8019688 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028326 | Palmer et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8122498 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8312535 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
20010042022 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019945 | Houston et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020040346 | Kwan | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046299 | Lefeber et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052950 | Pillai et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059095 | Cook | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077933 | Dutta et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078382 | Sheikh et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083343 | Crosbie et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087643 | Parsons et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103666 | Hanai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133522 | Greetham et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147803 | Dodd et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171546 | Evans et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178381 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184533 | Fox | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030084322 | Schertz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084340 | Schertz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120733 | Forman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135749 | Gales et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149888 | Yadav | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154263 | Hirai | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154269 | Nyanchama et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172301 | Judge et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191966 | Gleichauf | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208687 | Liang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006704 | Dahlstrom et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015719 | Lee et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064722 | Neelay et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083474 | McKinlay et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040148281 | Bates et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040181685 | Marwaha | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225877 | Huang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250133 | Lim | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010649 | Payne et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050086685 | Rahman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060016885 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021031 | Leahy et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060080735 | Brinson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060129947 | Hamzy et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060273893 | Warner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070273499 | Chlubek et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080046524 | Jerding et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090138353 | Mendelson | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144155 | Lora et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110270940 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Office Action Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288 mailed on Feb. 5, 2009. |
Final Office Action Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288 mailed on Sep. 17, 2009. |
Symantec Corporation, News Release, Symantec to Support New Version of Virus Scanning API for Microsoft Exchange 2000, Jun. 25, 2001, Cupertino, CA USA, retrieved from htt;://www.symantec.com/press/2001/n010625a,html on Feb. 8, 2011. |
Symantec Corporation, Norton AnitiVirus™ User's Guide: 2002, 2001, pp. 1-90, Version 8.0, Cupertino, CA, USA. |
Symantec Corporation, Norton Internet Seurity™ Professional User's Guide: 2002, Professional Edition, 2001, pp. 1-253, Version 1.0, Cupertino, CA, USA. |
Symantec Corporation, Norton Internet Seurity™ User's Guide: 2003, 2002, pp. 1-255, Version 6.0, Cupertino, CA, USA. |
Symantec Corporation, Norton AnitiVirus™ Corporate Edition User's Guide, 2000, 38 pages, Version 7.5, Cupertino, CA, USA. |
Phillips, C. et al., A Graph-Based System for Network-Vulnerability Analysis, Proceedings of the 1998 workshop on New security paradigms, 1998, pp. 71-79, ACM, New York, NY, USA. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Jan. 29, 2010. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Mar. 30, 2007. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Jan. 11, 2007. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Feb. 25, 2008. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Nov. 12, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Apr. 24, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Jun. 21, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Jul. 3, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Jul. 24, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Aug. 18, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated Nov. 10, 2008. |
Restriction Requirement from from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, dated May 16, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,072, dated Aug. 25, 2010. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, dated May 30, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, dated May 8, 2006. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, dated Oct. 5, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, dated Dec. 21, 2006. |
Advisory Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, dated Feb. 14, 2007. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, dated Nov. 1, 2006. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, dated Nov. 28, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, dated Apr. 18, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, dated Jun. 14, 2007. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, dated Jan. 29, 2007. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, dated Dec. 2, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, dated May 16, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, dated Jun. 22, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, dated Oct. 17, 2007. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,953, dated Feb. 24, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,953, dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/470,163, dated Sep. 9, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,170, dated Feb. 5, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,170, dated Jul. 5, 2006. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,877, dated Jul. 29, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,877, dated Dec. 24, 2008. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,877, dated Nov. 3, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,109, dated May 14, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/624,325, dated Dec. 14, 2010. |
Examiner's Answer from U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, dated Oct. 29, 2009. |
Examiner's Answer from U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, dated Apr. 17, 2008. |
“Norton Internet Security User's Guide: Norton Internet Security”, Symantec Corporation, 2000. |
“Norton Internet Security Professional User's Guide: Norton Internet Security, Professional Edition”, Symantec Corporation, 2001. |
“Norton Internet Security, User's Guide”, Symantec Corporation, 2002. |
“Norton Internet Security, User's Guide”: 2002. |
Symantec AntiVirus for Palm OS basics pp. 196-206. |
Dale Farris, Ontrack SystemSuite 3.0, “http://web.archive.org . . . ” |
Advisory Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, Mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, 2 pages. |
Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, Mailed on Apr. 28, 2011, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, Mailed on Sep. 15, 2011, 11 pages. |
Restriction Requirement Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, Mailed on May 16, 2006, 5 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, Mailed on May 25, 2011, 31 pages. |
Application for U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, filed Dec. 13, 2002, 80 pages. |
Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, Mailed on Dec. 2, 2008, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,025, Mailed on Sep. 29, 2011, 17 pages. |
Advisory Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,072, Mailed on Jul. 18, 2011, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,072, Mailed on Apr. 27, 2011, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,072, Mailed on Oct. 7, 2011, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action Received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/470,163, Mailed on Jul. 28, 2011, 12 pages. |
Application for U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,877, filed Apr. 16, 2007, 53 pages. |
Application for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, filed Dec. 12, 2002, 37 pages. |
Application for U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, filed Dec. 12, 2002, 37 pages. |
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,941, mailed on Jun. 20, 2011, 2 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,559, filed Dec. 12, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/318,693, filed Dec. 12, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, filed Dec. 13, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/325,170, filed Dec. 19, 2002. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,941, filed Sep. 14, 2007. |
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,941, mailed on Apr. 1, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/735,877, mailed on Apr. 16, 2007. |
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,941, mailed on Jul. 22, 2010. |
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 11/855,941, mailed on Nov. 14, 2011. |
Ontrack SystemSuite 3.0, “http://web.archive.org/web/20010427043719/http://www.gtpcc.org/gtpcc/systemsuite.htm”, pp. 1-8. |
Norton Internet Security User's Guide 2001 pp. 1-61. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/319,288, dated Sep. 17, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150113421 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11855941 | Sep 2007 | US |
Child | 14581286 | US | |
Parent | 10319288 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11855941 | US |