The present invention relates, in general, to database management systems and, more particularly, to a system, method and software for independently predicting attitudinal and message responsiveness, and preferences for communication media, channel, timing, frequency, and sequences of communications, using an integrated data repository.
Business and consumer records are typically contained in databases and other forms of data repositories. Typical databases may contain records such as demographic data, customer data, marketing data, name and address information, observed and self-reported lifestyle and other behavioral data, consumer data, public record information, realty and property tax information, summarized automotive statistics, summarized financial data, census data, and so on. Virtually any type of information may be contained in any such database. One such highly inclusive database, containing much of the above-mentioned types of data for approximately 98% of U.S. individuals and living units (households), is the Experian INSOURCE® database.
Various database applications have been directed to attempts to utilize the wide array of information contained in such databases for marketing and analytical purposes. For example, demographic data may be appended to customer records, to identify the demographic composition of a set of customers, followed by marketing directed toward people having similar demographic characteristics.
These database applications, in their various forms, attempt to understand and access distinct customer and prospect groups, and then send the right message to the right individual, household, living unit or other target audience. Typically, all of the individuals and/or households contained in the corresponding database are segmented into groups which share distinct demographic, lifestyle, and consumer behavior characteristics. In other applications, following such segmentation, consumer attitudes and motivations are assumed and attributed to those individuals/households within each such segment or cluster. The number of segments utilized varies widely by application.
In addition, in these various database marketing applications, consumer attitudes and preferred marketing message themes or types are generally assumed and assigned to a segment, without any independent empirical research and analysis. As a consequence, once a population is segmented, any further analysis of the population based on preferred messaging themes does not, in fact, add any additional, independent information, and merely reiterates the underlying message theme assumptions of any given segment.
The resulting data, moreover, may have a large degree of uncertainty, may or may not be accurate, and may or may not be actionable. For example, the attitudes, motivations and behaviors attributed or assigned to each segment may not be accurate and may not be based on factual, empirical research. Such attitudes, motivations and behaviors may or may not actually reflect representative attitudes found in a particular customer database.
The diminished accuracy of current marketing methods is further underscored by comparatively low response rates, such as 1-2% response from a target audience for direct mail marketing. Other methods and systems are required to appropriately target and motivate the remainder of the target audience, and to determine potentially new and underdeveloped target audiences. In addition, new methods and systems are required to maximize marketing returns, by not overly saturating the target audience with excessive and ineffective communications, and instead to appropriately communicate with the target audience using the audience's preferred methods and times of communication.
As a consequence, a need remains for a predictive methodology and system, for accurate prediction of attitudes, motivations and behaviors, which may be utilized for marketing applications. Such a method and system should be empirically-based, such as based on actual attitudinal, behavioral or demographic research and other information from a population sample, and further should provide accurate modeling to predict and extrapolate such attitudinal or other information to a larger or entire population. Such a method and system should provide information concerning preferred message themes or message content independently from any population grouping, segmentation or clustering process. In addition, such a method and system should be actionable, providing not only audience attitudinal information and preferred message content, but also preferred communication channel information or other preferred communication media, preferred frequency of communication or other contact, and communication timing information.
The present invention provides a system, method and software for independently predicting a plurality of first, message content classifications and a plurality of second, attitudinal classifications, for a selected population of individuals, households, living units or other groupings of people represented in a data repository, such as a selected population of customers or prospects represented in a database or data files. In addition, the system, method and software of the invention, depending on the selected embodiment, also determine preferences for communication channel or other media forms, communication timing, frequency of communication, and/or sequences of types of communication.
The illustrated, exemplary embodiments of the present invention are empirically-based, using actual attitudinal research and other information from a population sample. Other types of research or data may also be utilized, such as transactional data, demographic data, marketing research data, or other types of survey information. With this empirical basis, the invention provides accurate modeling to predict and extrapolate such attitudinal, behavioral, demographic or other information to a larger reference population, thereby providing for accurate prediction of attitudes, motivations and behaviors, which may be utilized for marketing applications, for example. The exemplary embodiments of the invention further provide information concerning preferred message themes or message content independently from any population grouping, segmentation or clustering process. In addition, the exemplary embodiments of the invention provide actionable results, providing not only audience attitudinal information and preferred message content, but also preferred communication channel information, communication media, communication frequency, and communication timing and sequencing information.
The power of the invention cannot be overstated. As indicated above, prior art methods have focused on finding “who”, namely, those individuals or households to whom marketers should direct their communications. None of these prior art methods provide, independently of the selection of “who”, determination of the “what” of the communication, such as preferred content or versions of marketing information. None of these prior art methods provide independent information on the “when” of the communication, such as the customer's or prospect's preferred time of day to receive communications. None of these prior art methods provide independent information on the “how” of the communication, such as the customer's or prospect's preferred medium or channel for communication, such as direct mail, telephone, electronic mail (email), broadcast media, print media, and so on. Lastly, none of these prior art methods provide independent information on the frequency (how often) and sequencing (ordering) of the communications, based on preferences, such as print media for a first number of times, followed by direct mail for a second number of times, followed by email, for example.
More specifically, in exemplary embodiments, the present invention provides a method, system and software for independently predicting both a plurality of first predictive classification, referred to as message content classifications, and a plurality of second predictive classifications, referred to as attitudinal or other behavioral classifications, for a selected population of a plurality of individuals, households, living units or other groupings of persons, as “entities”, represented in a data repository. As used herein, any reference to “entity” or “entities” should be understood to mean and include any individual, household, living unit, group or potential grouping of one or more people, whether related or unrelated, individually or collectively, however defined or demarcated, such as a household, a living unit, a geographic unit, or any other grouping of individuals for whom or which data may be maintained, generally at a granular or atomic level, in a database.
In the exemplary embodiments, empirical attitudinal research and predictive attitudinal classifications are illustrated as examples, and should be understood to mean and include other forms of research and classifications, such as behavioral or demographic classifications formed from corresponding empirical research, such as corresponding behavioral or demographic survey research, for example.
The various exemplary method, system and software embodiments of the invention, perform the following:
In addition, depending upon the selected embodiment, for each entity (e.g., individual or household) of the plurality of entities of the selected population, the various embodiments optionally provide for appending from the data repository a corresponding predictive communication media (or other channel) classification of a plurality of predictive communication media classifications, a corresponding predictive communication timing classification of a plurality of predictive communication timing classifications, a corresponding predictive frequency of communication classification of a plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications, and a corresponding predictive sequence of communications of a plurality of predictive communication sequence classifications, with these classifications having been determined from information stored in the data repository.
Typically, the plurality of predictive communication media classifications comprises at least two of the following communication media (equivalently referred to as communication channels): electronic mail, internet, direct mail, telecommunication, broadcast media (such as radio, television, cable, satellite), video media, optical media (DVD, CD), print media (such as newspapers, magazines), electronic media (such as web sites and electronic forms of newspapers, magazines), and public display media (such as signage, billboards, multimedia displays). Depending upon the selected embodiment, the plurality of communication media and channel classifications may be more or less specific, such as further subdividing print and electronic media channels into newspaper, weekly magazines, monthly magazines, journals, business reports, and further into their print, internet, email or electronic versions. In addition, various forms of broadcast media may have any of a plurality of forms, such as cable, satellite, television and radio frequency transmission, internet, etc. Also typically, the plurality of predictive communication timing classifications comprises at least two of the following communication timing classifications: morning, afternoon, evening, night, weekday, weekend, any time (no preference), and none. The plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications typically comprises at least two of the following frequency of communication classifications: daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly, semi-monthly, bimonthly, annually, semi-annually, and none. Lastly, the plurality of communication sequences are highly varied and may include, for example, print communications, followed by electronic communications.
In the various embodiments, the plurality of predictive message content classifications are or have been determined by:
The invention also provides for determining core, niche and growth attitudinal classifications, as follows:
In yet another aspect of the invention, the exemplary embodiments provide a method and system for independently predicting communication responsiveness of a selected population of a plurality of entities represented in a data repository. The method comprises: (a) for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population, appending from the data repository a corresponding predictive identification classification of a plurality of predictive identification classifications, wherein the plurality of predictive identification classifications designate a plurality of entities according to a selected property; (b) for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population in a corresponding predictive identification classification, appending at least one corresponding predictive message version classification of a plurality of predictive message version classifications, the plurality of predictive identification classifications and the plurality of predictive message version classifications having been determined from a plurality of predictive models developed from a sample population and applied to a reference population represented in the data repository; and (c) for each predictive identification classification of the plurality of predictive identification classifications, independently determining at least one predominant predictive message version classification from the corresponding, appended predictive message version classifications of the plurality of entities of the selected population of the predictive identification classification. The selected property is derived from at least one of the following: attitudinal characteristics, behavioral characteristics, demographic characteristics, geographic characteristics, financial characteristics, or transactional characteristics.
In yet another aspect of the invention, the exemplary embodiments provide a data structure for independently predicting communication responsiveness of a selected population of a plurality of entities represented in a data repository. Such a data structure may be stored in a database, transmitted electronically, or stored in a tangible medium. The data structure comprises: a first field having a plurality of predictive identification classifications, wherein the plurality of predictive identification classifications designate a plurality of entities according to a selected property; and a second field having, for each predictive identification classification of the first field, at least one predominant predictive message version classification of a plurality of predictive message version classifications, the plurality of predictive identification classifications and the plurality of predictive message version classifications having been determined from a plurality of predictive models developed from a sample population and applied to a reference population represented in the data repository.
The data structure may also include a third field having, for each predictive identification classification of the first field, at least one predominant predictive communication media classification of a plurality of predictive communication media classifications; a fourth field having, for each predictive identification classification of the first field, at least one predominant predictive communication timing classification of a plurality of predictive communication timing classifications; a fifth field having, for each predictive identification classification of the first field, at least one predominant predictive communication frequency classification of a plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications; a sixth field having, for each predictive identification classification of the first field, at least one predominant predictive communication sequencing classification of a plurality of predictive communication sequencing classifications; and a seventh field having a penetration index for each predictive identification classification of the plurality of predictive identification classifications. As indicated above, the selected property is derived from at least one of the following: attitudinal characteristics, behavioral characteristics, demographic characteristics, geographic characteristics, financial characteristics, or transactional characteristics.
In yet another aspect of the invention, the exemplary embodiments provide a method for independently predicting communication media responsiveness of a selected population of a plurality of entities represented in a data repository, comprising: (a) for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population, appending from the data repository a corresponding predictive identification classification of a plurality of predictive identification classifications, wherein the plurality of predictive identification classifications designate a plurality of entities according to a selected property; and (b) for each predictive identification classification of the plurality of predictive identification classifications, independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication media classification of a plurality of predictive communication media classifications.
In other embodiments, instead of step (b) above, the exemplary method provides for each predictive identification classification of the plurality of predictive identification classifications, independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication timing classification of a plurality of predictive communication timing classifications, or for independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication frequency classification of a plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications.
These and additional embodiments are discussed in greater detail below. Numerous other advantages and features of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention and the embodiments thereof, from the claims and from the accompanying drawings.
The objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily appreciated upon reference to the following disclosure when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and examples which form a portion of the specification, in which:
While the present invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there are shown in the drawings and will be described herein in detail specific examples and embodiments thereof, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific examples and embodiments illustrated.
As indicated above, the present invention provides a system, method and software for independently predicting a plurality of attitudinal classifications and a plurality of message content classifications, for a selected population of individuals, households or other living units (“entities”) represented in a data repository, such as a database. The embodiments of the present invention provide a predictive methodology, system and software, for accurate prediction of attitudes, motivations and behaviors, which may be utilized for marketing, research, assessment, and other applications. The embodiments of the invention are empirically-based upon actual attitudinal research and other information from a population sample, and provide accurate modeling to predict and extrapolate such attitudinal information to a larger reference population. The embodiments of the invention further provide information concerning preferred message themes or message content independently from any population grouping, segmentation or clustering process. In addition, the embodiments of the invention provide actionable results, providing not only audience attitudinal information and preferred message content, but also preferred communication and media channel information, communication frequency, and communication timing and sequence information.
In the exemplary embodiments of system 150, the database management server 140 and the application server 125 may be implemented together, such as implemented within the application server 125. Either or both of the database management server 140 and the application server 125 are connected or coupled (or couplable) to the data repository (database) 100B, for full duplex communication, such as for database queries, database file or record transfers, database updates, and other forms of database communication. In the second system embodiment 150, the database management server 140 and/or the application server 125 perform the methodology of the invention utilizing a correspondingly programmed or configured processor as discussed below (not separately illustrated), such as a processor 115 illustrated for system 110, in conjunction with a database 100 (such as database 100B).
Typically, the databases 100A and 100B are ODBC-compliant (Open Database Connectivity), although this is not required for the present invention. The first system 110 and second system 150 may also be coupled to or may be part of a local area network (“LAN”) 130 or, not separately illustrated, a wide area network (“WAN”), such as for full duplex communication with a plurality of computers (or other terminals) 135, also for database queries, database file or record transfers, database updates, and other forms of database communication. The LAN 130 communication capability provides for the first system 110 and second system 150 to be accessible for local access to the databases 100A and 100B, such as for large file transfers or other batch processing, discussed in greater detail below. In addition, the first system 110 may also be directly accessible (185), such as for loading of records (e.g., magnetic tape records or other media) for batch processing.
The first system 110 and second system 150 may also be included within or coupled to a larger data communication network 180, through network (or web) server 160, for full duplex communication with remote devices, such as a remote Internet or other network server 170 and remote computer (or other terminal) 175. Such remote communication capability provides for the first system 110 and second system 150 to be accessible for on-line functionality, discussed in greater detail below, such as for web-based access, using any of the prior art protocols, such as hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) or other Internet Protocol (“IP”) forms of communication for data, voice or multimedia.
The data repository (or database) 100, illustrated as databases 100A and 100B, may be embodied in any number of forms, including within any data storage medium, memory device or other storage device, such as a magnetic hard drive, an optical drive, a magnetic disk or tape drive, other machine-readable storage or memory media such as a floppy disk, a CDROM, a CD-RW, DVD or other optical memory, a memory integrated circuit (“IC”), or memory portion of an integrated circuit (such as the resident memory within a processor IC), including without limitation RAM, FLASH, DRAM, SRAM, MRAM, FeRAM, ROM, EPROM or E2PROM, or any other type of memory, storage medium, or data storage apparatus or circuit, which is known or which becomes known, depending upon the selected embodiment.
In the first system 110, the I/O interface may be implemented as known or may become known in the art. The first system 110 and second system 150 further include one or more processors, such as processor 115 illustrated for first system 110. As the term processor is used herein, these implementations may include use of a single integrated circuit (“IC”), or may include use of a plurality of integrated circuits or other components connected, arranged or grouped together, such as microprocessors, digital signal processors (“DSPs”), custom ICs, application specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”), field programmable gate arrays (“FPGAs”), adaptive computing ICs, associated memory (such as RAM and ROM), and other ICs and components. As a consequence, as used herein, the term processor should be understood to equivalently mean and include a single IC, or arrangement of custom ICs, ASICs, processors, microprocessors, controllers, FPGAs, adaptive computing ICs, or some other grouping of integrated circuits which perform the functions discussed below, with associated memory, such as microprocessor memory or additional RAM, DRAM, SRAM, MRAM, ROM, EPROM or E2PROM. A processor (such as processor 115), with its associated memory, may be adapted or configured (via programming, FPGA interconnection, or hard-wiring) to perform the methodology of the invention, as discussed above and as further discussed below. For example, the methodology may be programmed and stored, in a processor with its associated memory (and/or memory 120) and other equivalent components, as a set of program instructions (or equivalent configuration or other program) for subsequent execution when the processor is operative (i.e., powered on and functioning). Equivalently, when the first system 110 and second system 150 may implemented in whole or part as FPGAs, custom ICs and/or ASICs, the FPGAs, custom ICs or ASICs also may be designed, configured and/or hard-wired to implement the methodology of the invention. For example, the first system 110 and second system 150 may implemented as an arrangement of microprocessors, DSPs and/or ASICs, collectively referred to as a “processor”, which are respectively programmed, designed, adapted or configured to implement the methodology of the invention, in conjunction with a database 100.
The application server 125, database management server 140, and the system 110 may be implemented using any form of server, computer or other computational device as known or may become known in the art, such as a server or other computing device having a processor, microprocessor, controller, digital signal processor (“DSP”), adaptive computing circuit, or other integrated circuit programmed or configured to perform the methodology of the present invention, such as a processor 115, as discussed in greater detail below.
The database 100 generally includes, for example, a name table 205, an address table 210, a lifestyle and behavioral data table 215, and a demographic data table 220, and depending upon the selected embodiment, may also include a public record table 225, a census data table 230, a summarized financial data table 235, and other information tables 265. In various embodiments, the name table 205 and address table 210 may be combined as a single table. In the exemplary embodiments, the database 100 further includes an attitudinal (or behavioral) classification table 240, a message theme table 245, a communication media (or channel) table 250, a communication timing table 255, a communication frequency table 260, a communication sequence table 285, a response data table 275, and a transactional data table 280, as discussed in greater detail below. While illustrated as separate tables or relations, it should be understood that the information contained in such tables may be contained or distributed between or among any number of tables or relations, depending upon any applicable or selected schema or other database 100 structure, in any number of equivalent ways, any and all of which being within the scope of the present invention. The data repository 100 is generally included within a first system 110 and/or second system 150, and respectively accessed through the I/O 105 and processor 115, or an application server 125 or database management server 140, discussed above.
The name table 205 contains all individual, consumer, household, living unit, group or other entity names, in various forms, variations, abbreviations, and so on, and is also utilized for searching and matching processes, as discussed below. The address table 210 contains all addresses of individuals, households, living units, groups or other entities which will be utilized for searching and matching processes, as discussed below. In the exemplary embodiment, the lifestyle and behavioral data table 215 contains lifestyle and behavioral information for individuals, households, living units, or other groups or consumers, as “entities”, such as purchase behavior, activity data, and any self-reported data. The demographic data table 220 contains demographic information and possibly geodemographic information for consumers and other individuals, households, living units, or other entities, such as age, gender, race, religion, household composition, income levels, career choice, etc. The public record table 225 contains information available in public records, such as vehicle ownership records, driving records, property ownership records, public proceeding records, secured transaction records, and so on. The census data table 230 contains census information, typically available through a government agency. The summarized financial data table 235, when included in database 100, typically includes summaries of financial information generally for individuals or households in a given geographic region (e.g., by postal code), and could possibly also include bank account information, investment information, securities information, and credit or other private information, when available and to the extent allowable under any applicable regulations or laws.
The transactional data table 280 typically contains information concerning purchase history or other transaction history of the various entities. The response data table 275 contains information typically related to transactional data, such as for purchases made in response to a particular communications, such as in response to a catalogue, direct mail, or a magazine advertisement. The transactional data table 280 and the response data table 275, for example, may be based upon data from particular clients or groups of clients. The information contained in the lifestyle and behavioral data table 215, the demographic data table 220, the public record table 225, the census data table 230, and the summarized financial data table 235, other information tables 265, and any other available tables, depending upon the selected embodiment, are utilized in the creation of independent variables for the predictive attitudinal (or behavioral) modeling discussed below. The selected population data 270, which may be in any of various forms such as a table, a file, a flat file, a relation, a database, or another data schema, such as a copy of a selected customer database, contains names or names and addresses of individuals, households, living units, other groups or entities, such as customers or any other selected or designated population, and is utilized to provide predictive attitudinal marketing information for the selected population, as discussed in greater detail below. Also optionally included within database 100 are other information tables 265, such as for other demographic information, credit information, and fraud information, when available or authorized.
The attitudinal classification table 240, the message theme table 245, the communication channel table 250, the communication timing table 255, the communication frequency table 260, and the communication sequence table 285, are generally created, populated or segregated based upon the predictive attitudinal (or behavioral) modeling discussed below with reference to
Depending upon the selected database 100 embodiment, a table or index (relation or look-up table) 200 of identifiers or identifications (“IDs”) of a plurality of individuals, consumers, households, living units, other groups or entities, may be included within the database 100. The identifiers are typically persistent, with every entity assigned at least one ID. In the exemplary embodiments, the ID table 200 also provides relations, links or cross-references to a plurality of other relations or tables, such as, for example, the name table 205, the address table 210, the lifestyle and behavioral data table 215, the demographic data table 220, the public record table 225, the census data table 230, the summarized financial data table 235, the attitudinal classification table 240, the message theme table 245, the communication channel table 250, the communication timing table 255, the communication frequency table 260, the communication sequence table 285, and the other information tables 265. The ID table 200 may also provide relations, links or cross-references to selected population data (file, table or database) 270, depending upon the selected embodiment and the form of the data. The ID table 200 may be utilized in the searching and matching processes discussed below, and for other database applications, such as updating.
The method begins, start step 300, with results of one or more attitudinal (or behavioral) surveys of individuals, as consumers or as members of a living unit (household). As mentioned above, as used herein, “entity” or “entities” should be understood to mean and include any individual person, household, living unit, group or potential grouping of one or more people, whether related or unrelated, individually or collectively, such as a single individual, a household, a living unit, a geographic unit, or any other grouping of individuals for which data may be maintained, generally at a granular or atomic level in a database. For example, various databases may be maintained in which information is stored and available at an individual level, for individual persons and, in many cases, also maintained at a less granular level of living units (households), while in other cases, also within the scope of the present invention, information may be stored and available in a database only at a household level, with the predicted attitudinal and messaging classifications then pertaining to corresponding households (as a larger grouping of one or more individuals). In other cases, an individual residing at a first location may also be considered to be part of a living unit at a second location, such as a student residing in a college dormitory being considered part of a family household residing at a different location. All such variations are within the scope of the present invention and, for ease of reference, any references to an entity or entities means and includes any individual, person, or grouping or collection of persons, however such a grouping may be defined or demarcated.
In the exemplary embodiments, an empirical modeling process is performed in which selected questions from a survey are utilized for obtaining information pertinent to consumer purchasing, behaviors, and attitudes (which also may be considered to include various behavioral and demographic components). Survey questions, data and results are available from a wide variety of vendors, publications, and other sources. Survey questions may also be determined based upon the goals of the modeling and classification processes. The survey may be conducted and results obtained in any of various forms, such as via telephone, written survey, email survey, mail survey, internet survey, personal interview, etc. The selected questions from the survey are then subjected to a factor analysis, step 305, to statistically determine which questions are highly related to or among other survey questions, to what degree, and to isolate the significant questions and determine corresponding factors, step 510, with a selected group of highly related survey questions forming a selected, corresponding factor. This factor analysis may also be an iterative process in selected embodiments. The resulting plurality of empirical attitudinal factors identify attitudes, behaviors and motivations of the survey participants, and identify the significant corresponding survey questions. The plurality of empirical attitudinal factors which are selected depend upon the selected purposes of the classifications discussed below, such as marketing analyses, for example, and are also dependent upon the selected purposes of the survey (as are the resulting attitudinal and message content classifications, discussed below), and the cultural, sociological, demographic, and other characteristics of the sample population of the survey.
In an exemplary embodiment, a plurality of empirical attitudinal factors were developed as a result of the factor analysis and empirical attitudinal model determinations of steps 305 and 310. Exemplary factors for marketing purposes include, for example, consumer brand loyalty, impulse buying behavior, incentive driven behavior, and so on. Innumerable other factors and corresponding questions will be apparent to those of skill in the art, for other behavioral or demographic modeling, for example. Corresponding exemplary statements are illustrated below, to which a sample population was asked to agree or disagree, on a varying scale, from highly agree, somewhat agree, neutral, somewhat disagree, and highly disagree, resulting in an equivalent question format. The sample questions are exemplary, for purposes of illustration only, and any resulting set of attitudinal, behavioral or demographic models (discussed below) will be empirically determined based upon the purpose of the research survey, the selected survey questions and results, the survey population and culture, followed by factor analysis. Additional survey questions may also be utilized to expand the attitudinal factors utilized. Exemplary statements, utilized in a representative survey of the present invention, include, for example:
If a product is made by a company I trust, I'll buy it even if it is slightly more expensive.
I am willing to pay more for a product that is environmentally safe.
I like to shop around before making a purchase.
I'm always one of the first of my friends to try new products or services.
I prefer products that offer the latest in new technology.
If I really want something I will buy it on credit rather than wait.
I'd rather receive a sample of a product than a price-off coupon.
Following development of the plurality of empirical attitudinal factors of steps 305 and 310, all of the survey participants, as a sample population, are scored across each of the empirical attitudinal factors, step 315. For example, various survey participants may have indicated various levels of agreement (or disagreement) with the survey questions of a particular attitudinal factor, and as such, would be scored high (or low) for that particular attitudinal factor. The scoring process may also be computed in probabilistic terms, as a probability of exhibiting a particular attitude. As a consequence, in the exemplary embodiment, each survey participant was scored across the plurality of empirical attitudinal factors. Also for example, various survey participants may have similar scores across a plurality of empirical attitudinal factors, such as high scores for the same first factor, and low scores for the same second factor.
Following scoring of the survey participants across each of the empirical (attitudinal) factors in step 315, records in the database 100 pertaining to the survey participants, as individuals (or entities such as living units), are searched, and the survey participants are matched with their corresponding records within the database 100, step 320, generally utilizing the name table 205 and address table 210. For all entities such as individuals, households, living units, or other groups having matching records (i.e., matching individuals/households), demographic, lifestyle, behavioral, and other variables (from the database 100) are appended or linked to each (matching) survey participant, step 325, such as variables from the lifestyle and behavioral data table 215, the demographic data table 220, the public record table 225, the census data table 230, the summarized financial data table 235, the transactional data table 280, and the response data table 275, for example. In the exemplary embodiment, the Experian INSOURCE® database, as previously described, was utilized as the database 100. Using the appended database variables as independent variables, and using the empirical attitudinal factor scores as dependent variables, a predictive attitudinal model (or, equivalently, an attitudinally predictive model) is developed for each empirical attitudinal factor, step 330, thereby generating a corresponding plurality of predictive attitudinal models, one for each empirical attitudinal factor. In the exemplary embodiment, a logistic regression analysis is performed, to identify the database variables (as independent variables) which are statistically significant predictors of the attitude of the corresponding empirical attitudinal factor. Other statistical methods, such as multiple linear regression analysis, other forms of regression analysis, and other forms of modeling and statistical analysis, are also considered equivalent and within the scope of the present invention. Selection of given database variables is also a function of the availability of such variables within the database 100, namely, any given database may or may not include variables available in other databases. Not separately illustrated in step 330, the plurality of attitudinally predictive models may also be validated, such as by using a “holdout” (or separate) sample from the survey results.
Using the plurality of predictive attitudinal models of step 330, all or most database entities (or members), namely, all or most individuals, consumers, households, living units, or other groups contained in the database (i.e., contained in the database by having representative information in the database 100), are scored (or otherwise evaluated) across each of the plurality of predictive attitudinal models, step 335. Having been scored/evaluated, these entities (e.g., individuals or households) then form a reference population, utilized for comparative purposes discussed below. The results from each such entity (individual or group) being scored or evaluated based on each of the predictive attitudinal models, in step 335, then form or represent (or otherwise generate or determine) a corresponding plurality of predictive message content classifications, also referred to as predictive message theme classifications, for each such entity (individual or group) represented in the database 100. More specifically, using the plurality of predictive attitudinal models, each entity (individual, household, living unit, or other group) represented in the database 100 is predicted to have a corresponding probability of belonging in or to a classification associated with a particular attitude/behavior/demographic of interest, in which entities (individuals, households, living units, or other groups) exhibiting that attitude/behavior/demographic are generally responsive, receptive, attentive, conducive to or motivated by messages or other communications having a particular content or theme. Such content or themes, for example, to which individuals or groups may be receptive, may be matched, correlated or derived from various information sources, such as information contained in the lifestyle and behavioral data table 215, the response data table 275, and the transactional data table 280. As a consequence, the results from the evaluations using the predictive attitude/behavior/demographic models provide or form the corresponding predictive message content classifications for each entity (individual, household, living unit, or other group) of the reference population.
These classifications are referred to as predictive message content classifications (or message theme classifications) because, as discussed below, they are utilized to predict the message content or message themes to which individuals, households, living units, or other groups within that classification are likely to be receptive or responsive. As indicated above, the actual result of the scoring may be a probability of exhibiting the attitude in question, or may be a number or percentile which can be equivalently translated into such a probability. In the exemplary embodiment, the probability scores were further classified into nine tiers, which were then further utilized to create dichotomous variables in order to classify the entity (individual or group) as either exhibiting the attitude of interest or not exhibiting the attitude of interest. For each such entity (individual or group), the results of step 335, namely, the scores for each of the predictive attitudinal models and/or each of the resulting predictive message content classifications, are stored in the database, step 340, such as in message theme table or relation 245.
For example, using the scores or evaluations from the plurality of predictive attitudinal models for individual (or group) “A”, records may be stored indicating that “A” has a high probability level of belonging to predictive message content classifications “X”, “Y”, and “Z”, and a low probability level of belonging to each of the remaining predictive message content classifications. Alternatively and equivalently, records for individual (or group) “A” may be stored indicating that “A” has certain scores from the evaluations under each of the predictive attitudinal models, and belongs to predictive message content classifications “X”, “Y”, and “Z” (with dichotomous variables of “1”), and does not belong to each of the remaining predictive message content classifications (with dichotomous variables of “0”). As a consequence, depending upon the selected embodiment, all or most entities represented in the database 100 have associated scores for each of the plurality of predictive attitudinal models and, correspondingly, a membership (or no membership), or a degree or probability of membership, in each of the corresponding plurality of predictive message content (or theme) classifications.
It should be noted that in the exemplary embodiments, the empirical attitudinal factors and predictive message content classifications have a one-to-one correspondence, and may be very similar. In other embodiments, there may be more or fewer predictive message content classifications compared to empirical attitudinal factors. As indicated above, the empirical attitudinal factors are based on the factor analysis of the survey questions from the sample population and are utilized to develop the predictive attitude/behavior/demographic models incorporating the database variables. The predictive attitude/behavior/demographic models derived from the empirical analysis of the sample population are then extended into the database population, as the reference population. The results from this predictive modeling are then matched or correlated with other database information to create the corresponding predictive message content classifications. In addition, given the appended database variables, various demographic, lifestyle and behavioral characteristics may also be included in or as part of the descriptions of the predictive message content (or theme) classifications.
In the exemplary embodiments, a plurality of representative, predictive message content (or message theme) classifications were developed as a result of the analysis of step 335. Several examples of predictive message content classifications are illustrated below, with corresponding, exemplary message content guidelines. It will be understood in the art that these predictive message content classifications are exemplary and for purposes of illustration and not limitation, and that any resulting set of predictive message content classifications will be empirically determined based upon the selected survey purposes; the selected survey questions and results; the survey or sample population, demographics, socioeconomics and culture; the plurality of predictive attitudinal models; and the extrapolated database population.
Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classifications:
First Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classification: Exemplary message content guidelines include rewarding and complimenting for being the first to take advantage of new products and services, highlighting new or cutting edge products or offers, and demonstrating the prestige of the product/service offered.
Second Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classification: Exemplary message content guidelines include communicating the strength and quality of a brand, the importance of relationships and customer service, emphasizing the quality of a product, emphasizing the number of years in business, and integrity and quality awards.
Third Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classification: Exemplary message content guidelines include a family focus, bonuses, presenting how a product/offer is better than a competitive product/service, price comparison, and value features.
Fourth Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classification: Exemplary message content guidelines include appealing to altruism, activism, and appreciation for our ecology, the use of natural ingredients, and emphasis on quality with details.
Fifth Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classification: Exemplary message content guidelines include use of celebrity endorsements and testimonials to emphasize image and style, and use of incentive gifts.
Sixth Exemplary Predictive Message Content (or Theme) Classification: Exemplary message content guidelines include demonstrating a fair value using a straightforward, logical approach, a masculine emphasis, and use of peer/user comparisons and testimonials.
Referring again to
For example, for the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications described below: a first exemplary cluster exhibited both a “trend following” attitude and an “impulsive” attitude, but not an “incentive driven” attitude; and a second exemplary cluster exhibited an “environmentally conscious” attitude, a “brand loyal” attitude, and a “buy American” attitude, but not a “price conscious” attitude.
As a result of the cluster (segmentation or grouping) analysis of step 345, a plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications are developed, generally having a greater number of classifications than the plurality of predictive message content classifications, and providing higher granularity or discrimination among the various attitudes/behaviors/demographics exhibited among the database reference population. In the exemplary embodiments, using membership or non-membership in the plurality of predictive message content classifications (based on probability scores from the predictive attitudinal models), clusters were identified where the mean value of the dichotomous variable was 0.70 or higher, indicating a segment that had at least one strong loading.
Following the cluster analysis, in step 350, each entity (individual or group) represented in the database is assigned to a predominant predictive attitudinal (behavioral or demographic) classification, of the plurality of predictive attitudinal (behavioral or demographic) classifications, based upon his, her or its highest probability of exhibiting the attitude(s) (behaviors or demographics) of interest of the corresponding classification. This assignment may be determined equivalently by the entity's scores from the predictive attitudinal models and/or the correspondingly determined memberships in one or more predictive message content classifications. For example, individuals or groups predicted to exhibit only a single attitude of interest would be assigned to that corresponding predictive attitudinal classification (or cluster), while those exhibiting more than one attitude of interest would be assigned to a corresponding predictive attitudinal classification, as a cluster of those particular of attitudes. In the exemplary embodiment, those entities (using dichotomous variables or “all or none” scores for the predictive attitudinal models) not assigned as described above are then re-clustered to identify an optimal segment or cluster, which may not meet stricter scoring requirements, but nonetheless indicate a predominant, predictive attitudinal classification. Also in the exemplary embodiments, an entity is assigned to one and only one predictive attitudinal classification; in other embodiments, multiple predictive attitudinal/behavioral/demographic classifications may be assigned.
As is the case with the scores from the plurality of predictive attitudinal models and the corresponding assignments to the plurality of predictive message content classifications, such assignments of predictive attitudinal classifications are also stored in the database 100, step 355, such as in attitudinal classification table or relation 240. As a consequence, all or most entities represented in the database 100, in accordance with the present invention, have a plurality of records stored in the database 100, namely: (1) either or both the associated scores (results) for each of the plurality of predictive attitudinal models and/or, correspondingly and equivalently, a membership (or no membership) or a degree or probability of membership in the corresponding plurality of predictive message content (or theme) classifications (message theme table 245); and (2) an assignment into a predominant, predictive attitudinal classification (attitudinal classification table 240). Following step 355, the method of determination of predictive attitudinal classifications and predictive message content classifications using a data repository, in accordance with the present invention, may end, return step 360.
In the exemplary embodiment, a plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications were developed as a result of the analysis of step 345, and representative examples are illustrated immediately below. For each such exemplary predictive attitudinal classification, corresponding marketing strategies, lifestyle and interests, demographics, behaviors and attitudes, and socioeconomic indicators are illustrated, generally derived from corresponding database variables and other information available in a database 100, as well as syndicated survey research. It will be understood in the art that these predictive attitudinal classifications and their marketing names are exemplary and for purposes of illustration and not limitation, and that any resulting set of predictive attitudinal classifications will be empirically determined based upon the selected survey questions and results; the survey population, demographics, socioeconomics and culture; the plurality of predictive attitudinal models; the extrapolated database population; and the selected cluster analysis.
Exemplary Predictive Attitudinal (or Behavioral) Classifications:
First Exemplary Predictive Attitudinal (or Behavioral) Classification: Individuals and households in this first predictive attitudinal classification stay true to themselves and the brands that they prefer. They are selective with their purchases, and look for well-established products and services that have demonstrated quality and value. Individuals and households in this first predictive attitudinal classification are responsive to brand extensions and use coupons on the products that they already have an affinity toward. From the database 100, their lifestyle and interests include enjoyment of reading and visits to bookstores; television viewing and preferring informative programming and movie classics; investing wisely and often; maintaining an exercise and fitness regimen; and participation in activities such as golf, tennis, fishing, and occasional gambling. Also from the database 100, their demographics include being established mid-lifers; married, divorced or single; any children are grown and have left home; they typically own their own homes, and have established residences, usually in larger, affluent cities. The behaviors and attitudes of the individuals and households in this first predictive attitudinal classification include being ardent catalog shoppers; having a preference for outdoor lifestyle companies; shopping at upscale retail stores; preferring “the real thing” to generic products; visiting the grocery store frequently with a likelihood of using coupons to save on preferred brands; and enjoyment of domestic and overseas travel. Their socioeconomic indicators include a high income; an above average home value; established credit experience with a well-maintained, stable credit history; an undergraduate degree and some graduate studies; occupations including finance, accounting, engineering and real estate; and they drive luxury vehicles.
Second Exemplary Predictive Attitudinal (or Behavioral) Classification: Individuals and households in this second predictive attitudinal classification represent a highly affluent, successful and stable consumer market, containing established old-wealth and the nouveau riche. Their investments and dividends are as impressive as their incomes. They aspire to own and use the finest quality brands and services, and they are willing to pay the extra dollar for the privilege of living this lifestyle. They enjoy traveling quite extensively, so incentives that provided added benefit in this area are preferable. The active lifestyles they lead drive them to utilize all modes of convenient communication. The lifestyle and interests of individuals and households in this second predictive attitudinal classification include a love to travel domestically and overseas, preferring cruises and tours; shopping at mid-level to upscale stores; diverse sports interests and may be avid golfers; socially involved as club members, theatre and concert-goers, and with environmental causes. Their demographics include a wide age range, from young to mature adults; largest concentration is established and mid-life adults, who are typically married; their children range in age from grade school to high school; they typically own their own homes, having well-established residences, usually in comfortable and prosperous neighborhoods, in major and mid-size cities, and in urban city settings. The behaviors and attitudes of the individuals and households in this second predictive attitudinal classification include “working to live” rather than “living to work”; they are active, affluent, have an influential lifestyle and are financially astute; they make time for family and individual interests, and want the “good life” for their family; they are technology- and internet-savvy, with frequent web accessing. The socioeconomic indicators include a high income; an above average home value; extensive, established and good credit experience; they have an undergraduate degree with some graduate studies; their occupations include finance, engineering, healthcare, counseling, computer/technology and marketing; they are more likely to lease vehicles than to buy; drive new and used import cars and light trucks, and are drawn to near-luxury, luxury, specialty and SUV models.
Third Exemplary Predictive Attitudinal (or Behavioral) Classification: Individuals and households in this third predictive attitudinal classification are dedicated sports fans that enjoy a wide variety of outdoor pursuits—from do-it-yourself home improvement projects to scuba diving, and they enjoy their lifestyle. Their independence may make it a challenge to establish relationships with these customers, and they prefer product samples to coupons to provide immediate proof of the product's quality and immediate savings. Their lifestyle and interests include being outdoor enthusiasts; they have no preference for brand name goods over generic brands; they are dedicated sports fans, they enjoy working on mechanics, home improvement, boating, motorcycles, scuba diving and video games. The demographics of individuals and households in this third predictive attitudinal classification include mainly being young adults, who are single or divorced, with low indications of children present in the household; they typically rent instead of own residences, and live in apartments rather than single-family homes, with a wide variety of residential settings, often transient or in rural towns. Individuals and households in this third predictive attitudinal classification have behaviors and attitudes such as liking things to be simple and straightforward, “rough and rugged”, and self-determining. Socioeconomic indicators of individuals and households in this third predictive attitudinal classification include a below average income; a slightly below average home value; a newer credit experience with average extension; varied education levels; typically employed in service- and consumer-oriented industries and/or may be students; they typically drive used, domestic vehicles, and models include small to mid-size cars and small- and full-size pickup trucks.
Fourth Exemplary Predictive Attitudinal (or Behavioral) Classification: Individuals and households in this fourth predictive attitudinal classification are conservative, content with the status quo and not easily swayed. They focus on “hearth and home” for comfort and entertainment, avidly donate to the causes they support, and enjoy timeless activities such as leisure sports, musical performances, gardening, and reading. As consumers, they are motivated to spend money on their families, homes and hobbies but are careful to spend it well, making them highly responsive to coupons and discount offers. Their lifestyle and interests include family-oriented, domestic activities such as home improvement projects, gardening, cooking and entertaining. They are typically passionate donors that support causes such as religious, political and health issues. They are also devoted book and magazine lovers and sports enthusiasts. The demographics of the individuals and households in this fourth predictive attitudinal classification are that they are mainly seniors and retirees, typically married, whose children have left home (empty nesters). They typically own their own homes, usually multi-dwelling units rather than single-family homes, and prefer to live in rural towns and small city communities. The behaviors and attitudes of the individuals and households in this fourth predictive attitudinal classification include a relaxed living attitude, with a healthy standard of living, deriving significant pleasure from daily activities with family and friends. They make the most of their spending and utilize coupons. They like to keep up on interests in music, trivia and collectibles. Socioeconomic indicators for this classification include a low income, with an average to below average home value; stable, consistent and capable credit experience; they are typically high school graduates with some college; and primarily are retired. They typically drive domestic used vehicles that include mid-range cars and pick-up trucks
The plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications and plurality of predictive message content classifications, with additional information available in a database 100 as discussed below, become extraordinarily powerful tools when applied to a selected population, such as a group of individuals represented in a customer database, a prospect database, a client database, a membership database, an association database, and so on. In the exemplary embodiment, the additional information available in the database 100 includes, for all or most of the represented (or matched) individuals, households, living units or other entities: their preferred methods of communication and/or communication media (communication media table 250), their preferred times (time of day) of communications (communication timing table 255), their preferred frequencies of communication (communication frequency table 260), and their preferred sequences of communication (communication sequence table 285). This additional information may be determined in a wide variety of ways, including self-reported preferences and behaviors, third-party reported preferences and behaviors (such as transactions, purchases, and activities), observed preferences and behaviors, and inferred preferences and behaviors based on modeled data.
Referring to
There are a wide variety of alternatives or defaults for non-matching entities of step 405, including variations depending upon degrees or levels of matching. Exemplary alternatives include, for non-matching individuals or groups, appending and utilizing the average, most common or mode classifications for a particular geographic region, such as a postal code area. Another alternative includes excluding those non-matching individuals or groups from the remainder of the method and, equivalently, the selected population may be considered to be comprised of the matching entities from step 405. Those of skill in the art will recognize that the matching step 405 and the appending step 410 may be performed in a plurality of ways, including use of conditional loops or iterations, with each iteration corresponding to the matching and appending for a given entity, and with iterations continuing until all entities have been matched (or found to not match) and corresponding data appended.
The method then determines the distribution of the selected population across or within each of the predictive attitudinal classifications, to form a corresponding plurality of selected population distributions, step 415. Each selected population distribution is compared to a reference distribution for each of the predictive attitudinal classifications, step 420. Typically, a reference or baseline distribution is or may be the distribution, across or within each of the predictive attitudinal classifications, of the larger, often national or regional population represented in the database 100, referred to above as the reference population. For example, for a selected population, such as the purchasers of a particular automobile brand, when compared to a larger regional or national population on a proportional or percentage basis, that selected population may be comparatively or relatively over-represented in certain predictive attitudinal classifications, and that selected population may be comparatively or relatively underrepresented in other predictive attitudinal classifications.
Based on these comparisons of the distribution of the selected population with a reference distribution, for each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, a “penetration” or comparative index (or rate) is determined, step 425, with a comparatively greater or higher penetration index indicative of a higher proportional concentration of entities of the selected population within a given predictive attitudinal classification compared to the reference distribution, and with a comparatively lower or lesser penetration index indicative of a lower proportional concentration of entities of the selected population within a given predictive attitudinal classification compared to the reference distribution. For example, a 15% distribution of the selected population for the predictive attitudinal classification of “Q”, when compared to an 8% distribution for the reference population for this same “Q” predictive attitudinal classification, indicates a comparatively higher (or above average) penetration index or rate (a ratio of 1.875) of the selected population in this classification. Similarly, an 11% distribution of the selected population for the predictive attitudinal classification of “P”, when compared to a 16% distribution for the reference population for this same “P” predictive attitudinal classification, indicates a comparatively lower (or below average) penetration index or rate (a ratio of 0.6875) of the selected population in this classification.
In addition, for each predictive attitudinal classification, the reference distribution may be normalized to a particular value, such as 100 or 1.0, e.g., a reference distribution of 11% in a first predictive attitudinal classification may be normalized to 100 and a reference distribution of 7% in a second predictive attitudinal classification may also be normalized to 100. Also for example, for the selected population, and for a given predictive attitudinal classification, a penetration index of 150 or 1.5 may be utilized to indicate that the selected population has proportionally (or percentage-wise) 50% (or 1.5 times) more individuals (households, living units or other groups) in that given predictive attitudinal classification compared to the larger reference population, such as a national or regional population. As illustrated above with the various percentage distributions for the “Q” and “R” predictive attitudinal classifications, these comparisons are performed on a proportional or percentage basis, rather than a comparison of pure or gross numbers, as the selected population generally concerns a considerably smaller total number of individuals (or groups) compared to the reference population represented in the database 100.
As a result of step 425, penetration indices or rates are determined for each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, comparing the proportion or distribution of the selected population in that classification to the proportion or distribution of the reference population in that classification. The plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications are then evaluated by their penetration indices and, depending upon the selected embodiment, are also evaluated based upon the relative (or proportional) reference and selected population sizes within each predictive attitudinal classification, step 430. Using the penetration indices and relative or comparative reference and selected population sizes of each predictive attitudinal classification, three additional levels of attitudinal classifications are determined, namely, core attitudinal classifications, niche attitudinal classifications, and growth attitudinal classifications (steps 435, 440, 445). While core determinations are usually determined first (to avoid potential confusion with niche determinations, as based upon proportions of the selected population in addition to penetration indices), the other determinations may be performed in any order. In other variations, depending upon the selected evaluation algorithm, other determination orders for core, niche and growth attitudinal classifications may be available.
More specifically, in step 435, one or more core attitudinal classifications are determined by selecting, from the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, at least one predictive attitudinal classification having a comparatively greater (e.g., average or above) penetration index and having a comparatively greater proportion of the selected population. These core attitudinal classifications represent predictive attitudinal classifications having the largest percentage of the selected population, such as customers, and corresponding, significant market share. With respect to a selected population of customers of a particular brand, the core attitudinal classifications represent significant brand appeal to population segments exhibiting corresponding behavioral characteristics.
In step 440, one or more niche attitudinal classifications are determined by selecting, from the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, at least one predictive attitudinal classification having a comparatively greater (e.g., average or above) penetration index and having a comparatively lesser proportion of the reference population. These niche attitudinal classifications represent predictive attitudinal classifications having a high penetration rate (and corresponding market share), but a relatively small percentage of the reference population, such as a small percentage of a prospect population.
In step 445, one or more growth attitudinal classifications are determined by selecting, from the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, at least one predictive attitudinal classification having a comparatively lesser (e.g., below average) penetration index and having a comparatively greater proportion of the reference population. These growth attitudinal classifications represent predictive attitudinal classifications having some penetration success, and with the comparatively large percentages of the reference population, such as prospective customers, indicate significant opportunities to increase penetration and add new customers from an otherwise underrepresented group.
To this point in the method of the present invention, considerable attitudinal and behavioral information has been provided, which may be utilized for a wide variety of purposes. Based on empirical modeling, actual attitudes and behaviors of segments of a selected population may be predicted, using the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications. Depending upon selected purposes of the embodiment, additional information may be provided, such as the actual attitudes and behaviors of individuals or groups in the predictive attitudinal classifications, including the core, niche and growth classifications.
Additional information is also independently provided in accordance with the present invention. While a selected population has been predictively classified as exhibiting certain attitudes and behaviors, as “who” segments (such as who among the population are significant customers or prospects), an additional, independent and more fine-grained level of information is also provided, based upon the plurality of predictive message content classifications, providing independent “what” segments (such as what content will be most effective). More specifically, the actual members of the selected population, although assigned to a predictive attitudinal classification as a predominant classification, may also exhibit other or different attitudes and behaviors, represented by a probability or membership in one or more predictive message content classifications, in addition to those of the predominant predictive attitudinal classification. As consequence, in step 450, for each of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, the method also independently determines one or more predictive message content classifications, based on the predictive message content classifications of the actual entities (individuals or groups) of the selected population assigned to that selected predictive attitudinal classification. For each predictive attitudinal classification, the plurality of predictive message content classifications may also be ranked, such as by comparative or relative penetration, proportion or distribution of a given predictive message content classification for that predictive attitudinal classification, step 455.
This independent determination of predictive message content classifications based upon the actual, selected population (step 450 and optional ranking step 455) within each predictive attitudinal classification, may be used to produce (or effectively results in) an information matrix or data structure, consisting of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications (e.g., as rows) and the plurality of predictive message content classifications (e.g., as columns), both of which may be further ranked or ordered according to relative distribution, penetration and/or population size. As a result, not only may a selected population be predictively classified or segmented attitudinally and behaviorally, using the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, they may also be independently and predictively classified based on content or theme receptivity, using the plurality of predictive message content classifications. Communication channel, media, timing, frequency, and sequencing information may also be included in such a matrix, e.g., as columns, and is discussed in greater detail below, as the various fields of a data structure of the present invention.
In the exemplary embodiments, with the availability of channel, media, timing, frequency, and sequencing information in the database 100, the method continues with step 460, in which the predominant communication channel and/or media preferences are determined for each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, based upon the preferred communication channels and/or preferred media types of the entities (individuals or groups) of the selected population assigned to the given predictive attitudinal classification, such as email, internet, direct mail, telecommunication, radio (broadcast, cable and satellite), television (network (broadcast), cable or satellite), video (or DVD) media, print media, electronic media, visual or other public display media, and depending upon the selected embodiment, the plurality of communication and media channel classifications may be more or less specific, such as further subdividing print and electronic media channels into newspaper, weekly magazines, monthly magazines, journals, business reports, and further into their print, internet, email or electronic versions. For example, predominant communication channels for a first predictive attitudinal classification may be, in preferred order, direct mail followed by radio followed by email, while predominant communication channels for a second predictive attitudinal classification may be, also in preferred order, television followed by telecommunication followed by direct mail.
In step 465, the predominant timing (time of day) preferences for communications are determined for each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, also based upon the communication timing preferences of the entities (individuals or groups) of the selected population assigned to the given predictive attitudinal classification. For example, predominant timing preferences for a first predictive attitudinal classification may be, in preferred order, weekends followed by evening, while predominant timing preferences for a second predictive attitudinal classification may be, also in preferred order, mornings followed by afternoons. The timing preferences may be further qualified based upon media and communication channels, such as predominant timing preferences being evenings for television, and weekends for telecommunications.
In step 470, optionally, the predominant frequency preferences for communications are determined for each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, also based upon the frequency of communication preferences of the entities (individuals or groups) of the selected population assigned to the given predictive attitudinal classification. For example, predominant frequency preferences for a first predictive attitudinal classification may be, in preferred order, monthly followed by semi-annually, while predominant timing preferences for a second predictive attitudinal classification may be, also in preferred order, weekly followed by bi-weekly. The predominant frequency of communications also may be further qualified based on either or both timing preferences and media and communication channels, such as no frequency preference (unlimited) for television communications, and zero frequency (no communication) for telecommunication channels (e.g., telephone call, faxes).
In step 475, optionally, the predominant sequencing preferences for communications are determined for each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, also based upon the sequencing of communication preferences of the entities (individuals or groups) of the selected population assigned to the given predictive attitudinal classification. This information may also be incorporated into the matrix discussed above and the data structure discussed below.
Lastly, this collection of information is output and, in the illustrated exemplary embodiment, also stored in a database, step 480. In the exemplary embodiment, as indicated, a matrix or data structure of information is provided in step 480, indicating the following:
As indicated above, the system of the present invention generally comprises a memory storing a data repository (or database) 100 and a processor, such as a processor 115 included within a mainframe computer of system 110 or within either (or both) a database management server 140 or an application server 125 of system 150. The processor is programmed to perform the methodology of the present invention. As a consequence, the system and method of the present invention may be embodied as software which provides such programming.
More generally, the system, methods and programs of the present invention may be embodied in any number of forms, such as within any type of computer, within a workstation, within an application server such as application server 125, within a database management server 140, within a computer network, within an adaptive computing device, or within any other form of computing or other system used to create or contain source code. Such source code further may be compiled into some form of instructions or object code (including assembly language instructions or configuration information). The software or source code of the present invention may be embodied as any type of source code, such as SQL and its variations (e.g., SQL 99 or proprietary versions of SQL), C, C++, Java, or any other type of programming language which performs the functionality discussed above. As a consequence, a “construct” or “program construct”, as used herein, means and refers to any programming language, of any kind, with any syntax or signatures, which provides or can be interpreted to provide the associated functionality or methodology (when instantiated or loaded into a server or other computing device).
The software or other code of the present invention, such as any resulting or compiled bit file (object code or configuration bit sequence), may be embodied within any tangible storage medium, such as within a memory or storage device for use by a computer, a workstation, any other machine-readable medium or form, or any other storage form or medium for use in a computing system. Such storage medium, memory or other storage devices may be any type of memory device, memory integrated circuit (“IC”), or memory portion of an integrated circuit (such as the resident memory within a processor IC), including without limitation RAM, FLASH, DRAM, SRAM, MRAM, FeRAM, ROM, EPROM or EPROM, or any other type of memory, storage medium, or data storage apparatus or circuit, depending upon the selected embodiment. For example, without limitation, a tangible medium storing computer readable software, or other machine-readable medium, may include a floppy disk, a CDROM, a CD-RW, a magnetic hard drive, an optical drive, a quantum computing storage medium or device, a transmitted electromagnetic signal (e.g., used in internet downloading), or any other type of data storage apparatus or medium.
The results, information and other data provided by the system, methods and programs of the present invention also may be embodied as a data structure and stored or provided in any number of forms and media, such as a data structure stored within any type of computer, within a workstation, within an application server such as application server 125, within a database management server 140, within a computer network, within a database 100, within an adaptive computing device, or within any form of memory, storage device, or machine-readable media, as discussed above. In accordance with the present invention, such a data structure is comprised of at least two fields of a plurality of fields, as follows.
A first field of the plurality of fields provides or stores information, such as codes or designations, pertaining to a first plurality of classifications which provide identification of persons according to a selected property. For example, the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications identify persons (in either or both the reference population or the selected population), according to an attitudinal (selected) property. In other circumstances, this identification of “who” may be based on other selected properties, such as behavioral characteristics, demographic characteristics, geographic characteristics, financial characteristics, transactional characteristics, etc., such as identification of persons who engage in certain activities, who live in certain types of households, who live in a certain region or postal code area, who have incomes greater than a certain amount, who purchase particular goods of a particular monetary amount, and so on.
Optionally, depending upon the selected embodiment, additional fields related to this first field or which are subfields of this first field provide or store additional information pertaining to, for example, the percentage of the selected population or the reference population within each classification of the first plurality of classifications, or the corresponding penetration indices for each classification of the first plurality of classifications, or both, such as the corresponding penetration indices for the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications. Other information in these additional fields or subfields may also specify a size of a prospect population, for marketing applications, for example.
Also optionally, depending on the selected embodiment, the first field may also include additional fields or subfields based on other relevant or related properties. For example, this first field may be further divided into categories such as core, niche and growth classifications, as discussed above.
A second field of the plurality of fields provides or stores information, such as codes or designations, pertaining to a second plurality of classifications, in which the second plurality of classifications provides information pertaining to a corresponding plurality of message versions, message content, or message themes. This second field providing a designation or code for the “what” of a communication will typically have one or two forms (or both), such as containing general information concerning types of messages, as in the plurality of predictive message content classifications described above, or containing more particular information, such as specific content versions correspondingly tailored to the plurality of predictive message content classifications. For an example of the latter case, this second field may include at least one designation or code for a particular version (of a plurality of content versions) for use in a direct mail to the entities identified in the first field (via the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications), with other versions transmitted to other entities of the other classifications of the first plurality of classifications.
A third field of the plurality of fields provides or stores information, such as codes or designations, pertaining to a third plurality of classifications which provide media/channel information, such as the media and channel preferences which correspond to the preferences of the individuals identified in the first field. For example, this third field may include designations or codes (providing the “how” of a communication) corresponding to communication media (channels), such as for electronic mail, internet, direct mail, telecommunication, broadcast media (such as radio, television, cable, satellite), video media, optical media (DVD, CD), print media (newspaper, weekly magazines, monthly magazines, journals, business reports), electronic media (such as web sites and electronic forms of newspapers, magazines), and public display media (such as signage, billboards, multimedia displays).
A fourth field of the plurality of fields provides or stores information, such as codes or designations, pertaining to a fourth plurality of classifications which provide communication timing information. For example, this fourth field may include designations or codes (providing the “when” of a communication) corresponding to communication timing classifications such as morning, afternoon, evening, night, weekday, weekend, any time (no preference), and none.
A fifth field of the plurality of fields provides or stores information, such as codes or designations, pertaining to a fifth plurality of classifications which provide frequency of communication information. For example, this fifth field may include designations or codes corresponding to predictive communication frequency classifications, such as daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly, semi-monthly, bimonthly, annually, semi-annually, and none.
A sixth field of the plurality of fields provides or stores information, such as codes or designations, pertaining to a sixth plurality of classifications which provide communication sequencing information. For example, this fourth field may include designations or codes corresponding to particular sequences of communications, such as direct mail, followed by electronic media, followed by email. As indicated above, there are innumerable such combinations available.
A wide variety of selections of which fields are included in the data structure and the ordering of these various selected fields are available, as will be apparent to those of skill in the art, and are within the scope of the invention. In addition, this data structure embodiment may be housed, embodied, or stored in myriad orders and locations, such as different memory locations as directed by a DMA engine or memory address generator, for example. The data structure of the present invention may also be embodied, stored, distributed or communicated in a wide variety of forms, such as electronically (e.g., internet, wireless, email, storage disk), or through various print media, for example, such as in the form of a market research report.
In summary, the present invention provides a method, system and software for independently predicting a plurality of attitudinal classifications and a plurality of message content classifications, for a selected population of a plurality of entities (such as individuals or households) represented in a data repository. The method, system and software embodiments of the invention, in operation, each perform the following:
Typically, the independent determination of at least one predominant predictive message content classification comprises: for each predictive attitudinal classification, determining all of the appended plurality of predictive message content classifications of the plurality of entities of the selected population having the corresponding predictive attitudinal classification; and selecting one or more predictive message content classifications corresponding to a comparatively greater number of entities of the selected population.
In addition, depending upon the selected embodiment, for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population, the various embodiments provide for appending from the data repository at least one corresponding predictive communication media/channel classification of a plurality of predictive communication media classifications, with the corresponding predictive communication media classification having been determined from information stored in the data repository. For each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, the various embodiments provide for independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication media classification from the appended plurality of predictive communication media classifications of the plurality of entities of the selected population having the corresponding predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications. Typically, the plurality of predictive communication media classifications comprises at least two of the following communication media: electronic mail (email), direct mail, telecommunication, radio, television, video or DVD (digital versatile disk) media, print media, and visual or public display media. Depending upon the selected embodiment, the plurality of communication and media channel classifications may be more or less specific, such as further subdividing print and electronic media channels into newspaper, weekly magazines, monthly magazines, journals, business reports, and further into their print, internet, email or electronic versions, and such as further subdividing broadcast media such as radio and television into network, cable, satellite, etc.
Similarly, depending upon the selected embodiment, for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population, the various embodiments provide for appending from the data repository at least one corresponding predictive communication timing classification of a plurality of predictive communication timing classifications, the corresponding predictive communication timing classification having been determined from information stored in the data repository. For each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, the various embodiments provide for independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication timing classification from the appended plurality of predictive communication timing classifications of the plurality of entities of the selected population having the corresponding predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications. Also typically, the plurality of predictive communication timing classifications comprises at least two of the following communication timing classifications: any time, morning, afternoon, evening, night, weekday, and weekend.
Also similarly, depending upon the selected embodiment, for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population, the various embodiments provide for appending from the data repository at least one corresponding predictive communication frequency classification of a plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications, the corresponding predictive communication frequency classification having been determined from information stored in the data repository. For each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, the various embodiments provide for independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication frequency classification from the appended plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications of the plurality of entities of the selected population having the corresponding predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications. The plurality of predictive communication frequency classifications typically comprises at least two of the following frequency classifications: daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly, semi-monthly, bimonthly, annually, semi-annually, unlimited, and none.
Also similarly, depending upon the selected embodiment, for each entity of the plurality of entities of the selected population, the various embodiments provide for appending from the data repository at least one corresponding predictive communication sequencing classification of a plurality of predictive communication sequencing classifications, the corresponding predictive communication sequencing classification having been determined from information stored in the data repository. For each predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, the various embodiments provide for independently determining at least one predominant predictive communication sequencing classification from the appended plurality of predictive communication sequencing classifications of the plurality of entities of the selected population having the corresponding predictive attitudinal classification of the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications.
As part of the present invention, the various embodiments provide for determining the selected population of the plurality of entities by matching a listing of a plurality of customers to the reference population represented in the data repository. Alternatively, non-matching entities of the selected population may simply be considered eliminated from the processes involving the selected population. Exclusion of entities of the selected population from these processes may also be dependent upon a level or degree of match to the entities of the data repository 100, such as matching to an individual, a household, or merely a geographic or postal code area.
Also in summary, in the various embodiments, the plurality of predictive message content classifications are determined by: developing a plurality of empirical attitudinal factors based on a factor analysis of an attitudinal survey of the sample population; using each empirical attitudinal factor of the plurality of empirical attitudinal factors, scoring each participant of the attitudinal survey to create a corresponding plurality of empirical attitudinal factor scores; using a plurality of selected variables from the data repository as independent variables, and using the corresponding plurality of empirical attitudinal factor scores as dependent variables, performing a regression analysis to create the plurality of predictive attitudinal models; and using each predictive attitudinal model of the plurality of predictive attitudinal models, scoring the plurality of entities represented in the data repository, as the reference population, to create the plurality of predictive message content classifications. The plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications are determined by a cluster analysis of the plurality of predictive message content classifications of each entity of the plurality of entities represented in the data repository.
The invention also provides for determining core, niche and growth attitudinal classifications, as follows: determining one or more core attitudinal classifications by selecting, from the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, at least one predictive attitudinal classification having a comparatively greater (e.g., average or above average) penetration index and having a comparatively greater proportion of the selected population; determining one or more niche attitudinal classifications by selecting, from the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, at least one predictive attitudinal classification having a comparatively greater penetration index and having a comparatively lesser proportion of the reference population; and determining one or more growth attitudinal classifications by selecting, from the plurality of predictive attitudinal classifications, at least one predictive attitudinal classification having a comparatively lesser (e.g., below average) penetration index and having a comparatively greater proportion of the reference population.
Numerous advantages of the present invention are readily apparent. The embodiments of the present invention provide a predictive methodology, system and software, for accurate prediction of attitudes, motivations and behaviors, which may be utilized for marketing, research, assessment, and other applications. The embodiments of the invention are empirically-based upon actual attitudinal research and other information from a population sample, and provide accurate modeling to predict and extrapolate such attitudinal information to a larger reference population. In addition to identifying to “whom” a communication should be directed, the embodiments of the invention further provide information concerning the “what” of the communication, such as the preferred message themes or message content, independently from any population grouping, segmentation or clustering process. In addition, the embodiments of the invention provide actionable results, providing not only audience attitudinal information and preferred message content, but also preferred communication channel or media information, communication frequency, communication timing information, and communication sequencing information.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concept of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific methods and apparatus illustrated herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/791,331, filed Oct. 23, 2017, titled “System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/621,142, filed Jun. 13, 2017, titled “System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository,” which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/292,861, filed Oct. 13, 2016, titled “System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository”, which is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/689,425, filed Nov. 29, 2012 and issued Oct. 18, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,471,928, titled “System and Method for Generating Targeted Communications Having Different Content and with Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences Of Communications, Using An Integrated Data Repository”, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/881,436, filed Jun. 30, 2004 and issued Jan. 1, 2013 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,346,593, titled “System, Method and Software for Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness”, which are commonly assigned herewith, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein with the same full force and effect as if set forth in their entireties herein, with priority claimed for all commonly disclosed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4775935 | Yourick | Oct 1988 | A |
4982346 | Girouard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5201010 | Deaton et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5274547 | Zoffel et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5283731 | Lalonde et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305195 | Murphy | Apr 1994 | A |
5325509 | Lautzenheiser | Jun 1994 | A |
5347632 | Filepp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5454030 | de Oliveira et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459306 | Stein et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5504675 | Cragun et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515098 | Carles | May 1996 | A |
5560008 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563783 | Stolfo et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583380 | Larsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592560 | Deaton et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5627973 | Armstrong et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629982 | Micali | May 1997 | A |
5630127 | Moore et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649114 | Deaton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661516 | Carles | Aug 1997 | A |
5689565 | Spies et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696898 | Baker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696907 | Tom | Dec 1997 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745654 | Titan | Apr 1998 | A |
5745694 | Egawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5774357 | Hoffberg et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774868 | Cragun et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774870 | Storey | Jun 1998 | A |
5809481 | Baton et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819092 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819226 | Gopinathan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823879 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825884 | Zdepski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828837 | Eikland | Oct 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5857175 | Day et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864822 | Baker, III | Jan 1999 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5873068 | Beaumont et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889799 | Grossman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889958 | Willens | Mar 1999 | A |
5890140 | Clark | Mar 1999 | A |
5907608 | Shaffer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907830 | Engel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912839 | Ovshinsky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915243 | Smolen | Jun 1999 | A |
5918014 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924082 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930764 | Melchione | Jul 1999 | A |
5930776 | Dykstra et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933811 | Angles et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933813 | Teicher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944790 | Levy | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953707 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961593 | Gabber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966695 | Melchione et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991735 | Gerace | Nov 1999 | A |
6014688 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029139 | Cunningham et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044357 | Garg | Mar 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz | Apr 2000 | A |
6061658 | Chou et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061691 | Fox | May 2000 | A |
6064973 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070142 | McDonough et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070147 | Harms et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073241 | Rosenberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078892 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085169 | Walker et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101486 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115693 | McDonough et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144948 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6178442 | Yamazaki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202053 | Christiansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205432 | Gabbard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208979 | Sinclair | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209033 | Datta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6269343 | Pallakoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289318 | Barber | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298330 | Gardenswartz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308210 | Fields et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317752 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324566 | Himmel et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330546 | Gopinathan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334110 | Walter et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6385592 | Angles et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6385594 | Lebda et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412012 | Bieganski et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6424956 | Werbos | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442529 | Krishan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442577 | Britton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445975 | Ramsey | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460036 | Herz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477509 | Hammons et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487538 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
5870721 | Norris | Jan 2003 | C1 |
6505168 | Rothman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513018 | Culhane | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546257 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549944 | Weinberg et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6604089 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606744 | Mikurak | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611816 | Lebda et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6615247 | Murphy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623529 | Lakritz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631356 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633850 | Gabbard et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640215 | Galperin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6665715 | Houri | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671818 | Mikurak | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6698020 | Zigmond et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6748426 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757740 | Parekh et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801909 | Delgado et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810356 | Garcia-Franco et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6839682 | Blume et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847934 | Lin et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6873979 | Fishman et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6901406 | Nabe et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6915269 | Shapiro et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6925441 | Jones, III et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6959281 | Freeling et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6970830 | Samra et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983478 | Grauch et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993493 | Galperin et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003792 | Yuen | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013285 | Rebane | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7023980 | Lenard | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031945 | Donner | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7033792 | Zhong et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039607 | Watarai et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047251 | Reed et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050989 | Hurt et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054828 | Heching et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7072853 | Shkedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072963 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076442 | Lin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080027 | Luby | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085734 | Grant et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7117172 | Black | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7136448 | Venkataperumal et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7150030 | Eldering et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7152018 | Wicks | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152237 | Flickinger et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155508 | Sankuratripati et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165037 | Lazarus | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185353 | Schlack | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191144 | White | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194420 | Ikezawa et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212979 | Matz | May 2007 | B1 |
7240059 | Bayliss et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243075 | Shaffer et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249048 | O'Flaherty | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7275083 | Seibel et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7296734 | Pliha | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305364 | Nabe et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308418 | Malek et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310617 | Cunningham | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7313538 | Wilmes et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313622 | Lee et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314166 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328169 | Temares et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343294 | Sandholm et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7346540 | Lin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363308 | Dillon et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366694 | Lazerson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370057 | Burdick et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376603 | Mayr et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7376714 | Gerken | May 2008 | B1 |
7386786 | Davis et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392203 | Edison et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7424439 | Fayyad et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7428526 | Miller et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444302 | Hu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451095 | Bradley et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7458508 | Shao et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467106 | Levine et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7472088 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7499868 | Galperin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529689 | Rowan | May 2009 | B2 |
7546266 | Beirne et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546619 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556192 | Wokaty, Jr. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7562184 | Henmi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565153 | Alcock et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571139 | Giordano et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7580856 | Pliha | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7584126 | White | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7590589 | Hoffberg | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593893 | Ladd et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7606778 | Dewar | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610257 | Abrahams | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7617136 | Lessing et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7617160 | Grove | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7636941 | Blinn et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653592 | Flaxman et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7668840 | Bayliss et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672865 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7672897 | Chung et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685021 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686214 | Shao et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689528 | Zheng | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698236 | Cox et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707059 | Reed et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711635 | Steele et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7715546 | Pagel et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720750 | Brody | May 2010 | B2 |
7725300 | Pinto et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730509 | Boulet et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734570 | Bachman | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739142 | Chand et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742982 | Chaudhuri et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752236 | Williams et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7783515 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783534 | Armstrong | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788147 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788358 | Martino | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792702 | Katz et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7793835 | Coggeshall et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7801843 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7814004 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7835940 | Kowalchuk | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853630 | Martino et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7853700 | Lee et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7877320 | Downey | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7904524 | Wehner et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925549 | Looney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937286 | Newman | May 2011 | B2 |
7957991 | Mikurak | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962368 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962404 | Metzger, II et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7962501 | Semprevivo et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
RE42663 | Lazarus et al. | Aug 2011 | E |
7996521 | Chamberlain et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005712 | von Davier et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8005759 | Hirtenstein et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8006261 | Haberman et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8015045 | Galperin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8015140 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024264 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027871 | Willams et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027888 | Chandran et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8064586 | Shaffer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078453 | Shaw | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8078524 | Crawford et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086524 | Craig et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8104671 | Besecker et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126426 | Fridman et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126805 | Sulkowski et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8127982 | Casey et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135607 | Willams et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145754 | Chamberlain et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8161104 | Tomkow | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8190470 | Srivastava et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8200677 | Martino et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8234498 | Britti et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255268 | Rane et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271313 | Williams et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271378 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280805 | Abrahams et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8285577 | Galperin et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8285656 | Chang et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296229 | Yellin et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301574 | Kilger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8346593 | Fanelli | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8364588 | Celka et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8386377 | Xiong et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8392334 | Hirtenstein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412593 | Song et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8417559 | Joshi et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423634 | Drees et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438170 | Koran et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8458062 | Dutt et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468198 | Tomkow | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489619 | Martino et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8515828 | Wolf et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8515862 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8533038 | Bergh et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533322 | Chamberlain et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8560434 | Morris et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560666 | Low | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566167 | Munjal | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571919 | Rane et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571929 | Srivastava et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8606626 | DeSoto et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8606695 | Arora et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8620740 | Bergh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626563 | Williams et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630929 | Haggerty et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639920 | Stack et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8694361 | Durvasula et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8732004 | Ramos et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8738515 | Chaudhuri et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8768743 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8943060 | Krishnan et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8966649 | Stack et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9058340 | Chamberlain et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9105048 | Koran et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9152727 | Balducci et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9213646 | LaPanse et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9329715 | Schwarz et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9471928 | Fanelli et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9501781 | Singh et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9547870 | Bradford | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9595051 | Stack et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9704192 | Ainsworth et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9767309 | Patel et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9785890 | Sowani et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9846884 | Milana et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10019593 | Patel et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10089664 | Hamdi et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10169775 | Koltnow et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10248968 | Sivaramakrishnan et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10292008 | Nack et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10304075 | Walz et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10354311 | Ainsworth, III et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10380619 | Pontious | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10380654 | Hirtenstein et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10423976 | Walz | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10460335 | West | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10467672 | Ainsworth, III et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10510094 | Sivaramakrishnan et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10621600 | Palan et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10657229 | Zoldi et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10664759 | Naik | May 2020 | B2 |
10678894 | Yin et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10685133 | Patel et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10726425 | Korra et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10810605 | Fanelli et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10825038 | Walz et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10885544 | Chaouki et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10929924 | Koltnow et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10956940 | Rahman et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11026042 | Nack et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11080722 | Werner et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11087339 | Sowani et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11164206 | Andrick | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11250499 | Fahner | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11257117 | Tsang et al. | Feb 2022 | B1 |
11443299 | Hoar | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11468472 | Zoldi et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11468508 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039523 | Iwamoto | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004754 | Gardenswartz | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023051 | Kunzle et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029162 | Mascarenhas | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046099 | Frengut et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046105 | Gardenswartz | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049968 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051020 | Ferrari et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055906 | Katz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065716 | Kuschill | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069203 | Dar et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077890 | LaPointe et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077964 | Brody et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083043 | Hoshi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099641 | Mills et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099824 | Bender et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099936 | Kou et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116253 | Coyne et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120504 | Gould et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123904 | Amengual et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020123928 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128960 | Lambiotte et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129368 | Schlack et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133404 | Pedersen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138331 | Hosea et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138333 | DeCotiis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138334 | DeCotiis et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147669 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147695 | Khedkar et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161664 | Shaya et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169655 | Beyer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018769 | Foulger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023489 | McGuire et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033242 | Lynch et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041050 | Smith et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046222 | Bard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060284 | Hamalainen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061233 | Manasse et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065563 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093311 | Knowlson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110293 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120591 | Birkhead et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144950 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158776 | Landesmann | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163708 | Tang | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200135 | Wright | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216965 | Libman | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229507 | Perge | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229892 | Sardera | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233278 | Marshall | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233323 | Bilski et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233655 | Gutta et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024848 | Smith | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039688 | Sulkowski et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049729 | Penfield | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059626 | Smallwood | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062213 | Koss | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078809 | Drazin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083215 | de Jong | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040098625 | Lagadec et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102197 | Dietz | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107125 | Guheen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122730 | Tucciarone et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122735 | Meshkin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128193 | Brice et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128236 | Brown et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138932 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139025 | Coleman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153509 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163101 | Swix | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176995 | Fusz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193487 | Purcell et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199456 | Flint et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199584 | Kirshenbaum et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199789 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205157 | Bibelnieks et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210471 | Luby | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230820 | Hui Hsu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040261116 | Mckeown et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010494 | Mourad et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021397 | Cui et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050027 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060242 | Armstrong | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065809 | Henze | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091077 | Reynolds | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097039 | Kulcsar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102375 | Varghese | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120045 | Klawon | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120249 | Shuster | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144067 | Farahat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144641 | Lewis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159996 | Lazarus | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177442 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177489 | Neff et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192008 | Desai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201272 | Wang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204381 | Ludvig et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209922 | Hofmeister | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222900 | Fuloria et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222906 | Chen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050233742 | Karaoguz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234969 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251820 | Stefanik et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257250 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261959 | Moyer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273849 | Araujo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278246 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278743 | Flickinger et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288954 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004626 | Holmen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004731 | Seibel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020611 | Gilbert et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041443 | Horvath | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041500 | Diana et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053047 | Garcia et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059062 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059073 | Walzak | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080210 | Mourad et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080233 | Mendelovich et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080251 | Fried et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080274 | Mourad | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089914 | Shiel | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095363 | May | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100954 | Schoen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122921 | Comerford et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144927 | Love et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155639 | Lynch et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168068 | Ziegert | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173772 | Hayes et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178189 | Walker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178971 | Owen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178983 | Nice et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195866 | Thukral | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206379 | Rosenberg | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206416 | Farias | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212350 | Ellis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212353 | Roslov et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218079 | Goldblatt et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224696 | King et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229943 | Mathias et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229996 | Keithley et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230415 | Roeding | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241923 | Xu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242046 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242050 | Haggerty et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247991 | Jin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253323 | Phan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259364 | Strock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276171 | Pousti | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277102 | Agliozzo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282327 | Neal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282328 | Gerace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282856 | Errico et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287915 | Boulet et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287919 | Rubens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293921 | McCarthy et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293954 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293955 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294199 | Bertholf | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011020 | Martin | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011039 | Oddo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011099 | Sheehan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016518 | Atkinson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070022032 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027791 | Young et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033227 | Gaito et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038516 | Apple et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061190 | Wardell | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061195 | Liu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061243 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067297 | Kublickis | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067437 | Sindambiwe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078835 | Donnelli | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121843 | Atazky et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129993 | Alvin | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156515 | Hasselback et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156589 | Zimler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070157110 | Gandhi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169189 | Crespo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174122 | Howard et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175986 | Petrone et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192165 | Haggerty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192409 | Kleinstern et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208619 | Branam et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220553 | Branam et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220611 | Socolow et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233857 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244732 | Chatterji et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271178 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271582 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282684 | Prosser et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288271 | Klinkhammer | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288298 | Gutierrez et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288950 | Downey et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288953 | Sheeman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294126 | Maggio | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294163 | Harmon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299771 | Brody | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004957 | Hildreth et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005313 | Flake et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010142 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010206 | Coleman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021802 | Pendleton | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028067 | Berkhin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040216 | Dellovo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059317 | Chandran et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059352 | Chandran | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065774 | Keeler | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086368 | Bauman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091535 | Heiser et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097928 | Paulson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120155 | Pliha | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126476 | Nicholas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133325 | De et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134042 | Jankovich | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140476 | Anand et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147425 | Durvasula | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167956 | Keithley | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177836 | Bennett | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183564 | Tien et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080184289 | Cristofalo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080208548 | Metzger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215470 | Sengupta et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215607 | Kaushansky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222127 | Bergin | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228578 | Mashinsky | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228635 | Megdal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255897 | Megdal et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080256061 | Chang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294540 | Celka et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294546 | Flannery | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301727 | Cristofalo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006475 | Udezue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018996 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019027 | Ju et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024462 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090044246 | Sheehan et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064326 | Goldstein | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090076883 | Kilger et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089205 | Bayne | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094640 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113532 | Lapidous | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119169 | Chandratillake et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119199 | Salahi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132347 | Anderson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132559 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132691 | Daurensan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090133058 | Kouritzin et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144102 | Lopez | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144201 | Gierkink et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164293 | Coley | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171755 | Kane et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172035 | Lessing et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177480 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090215479 | Karmarkar | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222380 | Choudhuri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228918 | Rolff et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234665 | Conkel | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234708 | Heiser, II et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234715 | Heiser, II et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249440 | Platt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265326 | Lehrman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288109 | Downey et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313163 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319648 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100010935 | Shelton | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017300 | Bramlage et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030649 | Ubelhor | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037255 | Sheehan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100094704 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094758 | Chamberlain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106568 | Grimes | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114663 | Casas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138290 | Zschocke et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145791 | Canning et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161492 | Harvey et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169159 | Rose et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169264 | O'Sullivan | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185453 | Satyavolu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191598 | Toennis | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211445 | Bodington | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100268660 | Ekdahl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023115 | Wright | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029388 | Kendall et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047072 | Ciurea | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066495 | Ayloo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071950 | Ivanovic | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076663 | Krallman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078018 | Chunilal | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078073 | Annappindi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093327 | Fordyce, III et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125595 | Neal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137789 | Kortina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164746 | Nice et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178843 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178844 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178845 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178846 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178847 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178848 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178855 | Rane et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178899 | Huszar | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202407 | Buhrmann et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208578 | Bergh et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110211445 | Chen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110212717 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213641 | Metzger, II et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219421 | Ullman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258050 | Chan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264581 | Clyne | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270618 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270661 | Heiser, II et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276396 | Rathod | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282739 | Mashinsky et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110307397 | Benmbarek | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314048 | Ickman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011056 | Ward et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011068 | Dearing | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011158 | Avner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016733 | Belvin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120016948 | Sinha | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120047219 | Feng et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054592 | Jaffe et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120060207 | Mardikar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066065 | Switzer | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101892 | LeFebvre | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110677 | Abendroth et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143921 | Wilson | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179536 | Kalb et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120203639 | Webster et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209586 | Mieritz et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239497 | Nuzzi | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120239515 | Batra et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130080242 | Alhadeff et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080467 | Carson et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085804 | Leff et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117832 | Gandhi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132151 | Stibel et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130173481 | Hirtenstein et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218638 | Kilger et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226857 | Shim et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252638 | Yang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262226 | LaChapelle et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293363 | Plymouth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130332230 | Fanelli et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339065 | Denning et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339087 | Fanelli et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339143 | Drozd et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140025489 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025815 | Low | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032265 | Paprocki et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140046887 | Lessin | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058818 | Drozd et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140096249 | Dupont et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140164112 | Kala | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164398 | Smith et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140172576 | Spears et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188555 | Durvasula | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214482 | Williams et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222908 | Park et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140236706 | Opie et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140278507 | Potter | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140279420 | Okerlund et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140310098 | Epperson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330670 | Ainsworth, III et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150019394 | Unser et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150058957 | Halliday et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150095104 | Goldberg | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106270 | Burrell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150128240 | Richards et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128287 | LaFever | May 2015 | A1 |
20150193821 | Izumori et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150262248 | Chaouki et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150278225 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150295906 | Ufford et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150332391 | Srivastava et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150348200 | Fair et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160055487 | Votaw et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160071175 | Reuss et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092997 | Shen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160162913 | Linden et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160189192 | Walz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160267508 | West | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160371740 | Heiser, II et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170032393 | Fanelli et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170186297 | Brenner | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170193315 | El-Khamy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20180060954 | Yin | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180068323 | Stratton et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190087848 | Koltnow et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190147519 | Ainsworth, III et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190164184 | Walz | May 2019 | A1 |
20190180327 | Balagopalan et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190230464 | Nack et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190244237 | Magnuson, Jr. et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200043103 | Sheptunov | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200126040 | Chilaka et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200286168 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294127 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200334695 | Schmidt | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200334702 | Butvin et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200349240 | Yin et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210019742 | Pontious et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210142372 | Sadhwani et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210406948 | Chaouki et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220027934 | Andrick | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220182352 | Torrey et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220198555 | Fahner | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 865 348 | Mar 2015 | CA |
2 942 328 | Apr 2020 | CA |
1290372 | May 2001 | CN |
114004655 | Feb 2022 | CN |
91 08 341 | Oct 1991 | DE |
0 554 083 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 749 081 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1 028 401 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 122 664 | Aug 2001 | EP |
10-293732 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-068828 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2009-122880 | Jun 2009 | JP |
10-2013-0107394 | Oct 2013 | KR |
I256569 | Jun 2006 | TW |
WO 91003789 | Mar 1991 | WO |
WO 94006103 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 95016971 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 96042041 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 97023838 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 98041913 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 98049643 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 98057285 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 99004350 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 99022328 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 99032985 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 99033012 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 99037066 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 99059375 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 99067731 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 00055789 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 00055790 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 00068862 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 01010090 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 01011522 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 01075754 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 02013025 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 03101123 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2006110873 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007149941 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008022289 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008057853 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008076343 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008127288 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009132114 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010045160 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010062537 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2010093678 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010132492 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2010150251 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011005876 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2014018900 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2018039377 | Mar 2018 | WO |
200903243 | Mar 2010 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models.” Management science 35.8 (1989): 982-1003. (Year: 1989). |
Bagozzi, Richard P., and Youjae Yi. “On the evaluation of structural equation models.” Journal of the academy of marketing science 16.1 (1988): 74-94. (Year: 1988). |
Warshaw, Paul R. “A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein.” Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 17.2 (1980). (Year: 1980). |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/881,436, U.S. Pat. No. 8,346,596, System, Method, and Software for Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, filed Jun. 30, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,425, U.S. Pat. No. 9,471,928, System and Method for Generating Targeted Communications Having Different Content and With Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository, filed Nov. 29, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/292,861, 2017/0032393, System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository, filed Oct. 13, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/621,142, System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository, filed Jun. 13, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/791,331, U.S. Pat. No. 10,810,605, System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository, filed Oct. 23, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,443, 2013/0339087, System, Method, Software and Data Structure for Independent Prediction of Attitudinal and Message Responsiveness, and Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository, filed Nov. 29, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,465, 2013/0332230, System and Method for Generating Targeted Communications Having Different Content and With Preferences for Communication Media, Channel, Timing, Frequency, and Sequences of Communications, Using an Integrated Data Repository, filed Nov. 29, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,489, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,511, filed Feb. 12, 2010, Bargoli et al. |
“Accenture Launches Media Audit and Optimization Service to Help U.S. Companies Measure Return on Investment in Advertising,” Business Wire, May 22, 2006, 2 pages, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2006_May_22/ai_n16374159. |
“Accenture Newsroom: Accenture Completes Acquisition of Media Audits: Acquisition Expands Company's Marketing Sciences and Data Services Capabilities,” accenture.com, Dec. 12, 2005, 2 pages, http://accenture.tekgroup.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=428. |
“Aggregate and Analyze Social Media Content: Gain Faster and Broader Insight to Market Sentiment,” SAP Partner, Mantis Technology Group, Apr. 2011, pp. 4. |
Akl, Selim G., “Digital Signatures: A Tutorial Survey,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 15-24. |
“Atlas on Demand, Concurrent, and Everstream Strike Video-On-Demand Advertising Alliance”, www.atlassolutions.com, Jul. 13, 2006, 3 pages. |
“Arbitron 2006 Black Consumers,” Arbitron Inc., lvtsg.com, Jul. 8, 2006, 2 pages, http://www.lvtsg.com/news/publish/Factoids/article_3648.shtml. |
“Atlas On Demand and C-COR Join Forces to Offer Advertising Management Solution for On Demand TV: Global Provider of On Demand Systems Partners with Atlas to Develop and Market Comprehensive VOD Advertising Solution,” www.atlassolutions.com, Jul. 25, 2005, 3 pages. |
“Atlas On Demand and Tandberg Television Join Forces to Enhance Dynamic Ad Placement for On-Demand Television: Combined End-to End Solution to Provide Media Buying and Selling Communities with New Tools for Dynamic Advertising that Eliminate Technical Bar” Jun 22, 2006—3 pages, http://www.atlassolutions.com/news_20060622.aspx. |
Adzilla, Press Release, “ZILLACASTING Technology Approved and Patent Pending,” http://www.adzilla.com/newsroom/pdf/patent_051605.pdf, May 16, 2005, pp. 2. |
AFX New Limited—AFX International Focus, “Nielsen moving to measure off-TV viewing,” Jun. 14, 2006, 1 page. |
Amo, Tina, “How to Find Out Who Has Lived inYour House Before You”, https://web.archive.org/web/20130327090532/http://homeguides.sfgate.com/out-lived-house-before-50576.html as archived Mar. 27, 2013, pp. 2. |
Applied Geographic Solutions, “What is MOSAIC™”, as captured Feb. 15, 2004 from http://web.archive.org/web/20040215224329/http://www.appliedgeographic.com/mosaic.html in 2 pages. |
Axiom, “Capabilites”, http://www.axiomcom.com/capabilities/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Bachman, Katy, “Arbitron, VNU Launch Apollo Project,” mediaweek.com Jan. 17, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/search/article_display.jsp?schema=&vnu_content_id=1001847353. |
Bagozzi et al., “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models”, JAMS, 1988, pp. 74-94. |
“Bank of America Direct Web-Based Network Adds Core Functionality to Meet Day-To-Day Treasury Needs”, Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999. pp. 2. |
“Bank of America Launches Total Security Protection™; Features Address Cardholders' Financial Safety Concerns; Supported by $26 Million National Advertising Campaign; Free Educational Materials”, PR Newswire, Oct. 9, 2002, pp. 2. |
Bitran et al., “Mailing Decisions in Catalog Sales Industry”, Management Science (JSTOR), vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1364-1381, Sep. 1996. |
Blackbaud.com, www.blackbaud.com, various pages, retrieved Jan. 22, 2009 from www.archive.org, 23 pages. |
Brown et al., “ALCOD IDSS:Assisting the Australian Stock Market Surveillance Team's Review Process,” Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, Dec. 1, 1996, pp. 625-641. |
Bult et al., “Optimal Selection for Direct Mail,” Marketing Science, Nov. 1995, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 378-394. |
Burr Ph.D., et al., “Utility Payments as Alternative Credit Data: A Reality Check”, Asset Builders of America, Inc., Oct. 5, 2006, pp. 1-18, Washington, D.C. |
“Cable Solution Now, The Industry Standard for Information Management: Strata's TIM.net Crosses Important Threshold Dominant Solution for All Top 20 TV Markets,” stratag.com, Apr. 28, 2006, 1 page, http://stratag.com/news/cablepress042806.html. |
Caliendo, et al., “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching”, IZA:Discussion Paper Series, No. 1588, Germany, May 2005, pp. 32. |
Card Marketing, Use the Latest CRM Tools and Techniques, www.CardForum.com, vol. 5 No. 10, Dec. 2001. |
“Case Study: Expanding to Non-Traditional Prescreen Marketing Channels Reduces Company's Cost per Account Booked”, FairIsaac, https://web.archive.org/web/20060428115326/http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/rdonlyres/048FAE87-14B5-4732-970D-BDF20F09EB2D/0/MSDSRealTimeCS.pdf, Apr. 2003, pp. 2. |
ChannelWave.com, PRM Central—About PRM, http://web.archive.org/web/20000510214859/http://www.channelwave.com as printed on Jun. 21, 2006, May 2000 Archive. |
“Chase Gets Positive,” Bank Technology News, May 6, 2000, vol. 14, No. 5, p. 33. |
Chung, Charles; Internet Retailer, “Multi-channel retailing requires the cleanest data—but don't expect it from the customer”, Jan./Feb. 2002. |
“Claritas Forms Life Insurance Consortium with Worldwide Financial Services Association: Initiative with Limra International is First of its Kind to Provide Actual Sales Information at Small Geographic Areas,” Feb. 9, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.claritas.com/claritas/Default/jsp?ci=5&si=1&pn=limra. |
“Claritas Introduces PRIZM NE Consumer Electronic Monitor Profiles: New Information Product Provides Insight Into the Public's Purchasing Behaviors of Consumer Electronics,” May 30, 2006, 3 pages. |
“Cole Taylor Bank Chooses Integrated E-Banking/E-Payments/Reconciliation Solution From Fundtech”, Business Wire, Oct. 21, 1999, pp. 2. |
Click Z, “ISPs Collect User Data for Behavioral Ad Targeting,” dated Jan. 3, 2008, printed from http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=clickz Apr. 16, 2008. |
CNET news.com, “Target me with your ads, please,” dated Dec. 5, 2007, printed from http://www.news.com/2102-1024_3-6221241.html?tag+st.util.print Mar. 18, 2008. |
Creamer, Matthew; Consulting in marketing; Accenture, Others Playing Role in Firms' Processes, Crain's Chicago Business, Jun. 12, 2006, 2 pages. |
Culhane, Patrick, “Data: Powerfully Linking Service and Profitability,” Jul./Aug. 1996, Bank Management, vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 8-12. |
CuneXus, “CuneXus Unveils Click-to-Accept Mobile Lending Platform at Finovate (VIDEO)”, https://cunexusonline.com/cunexus-finovatespring-video-released/, May 2, 2014, pp. 2. |
“Database Marketing: A new Approach to the Old Relationships,” Chain Storage Executive Edition, Dialogue, Sep. 1991, pp. 2. |
Davies, Donald W., “Applying the RSA Digital Signature to Electronic Mail,” Computer, Feb. 1983, pp. 55-62. |
Davis et al., “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, Aug. 1989, vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003. |
DeGruchy, et al., “Geodemographic Profiling Benefits Stop-Smoking Service;” The British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management; Feb. 2007; 24, 7; pp. 29-31. |
Delany et al., “Firm Mines Offline Data to Target Online”, http://web.archive.org/web/20071117140456/http://www.commercialalert.org/news/archive/2007/10/firm-mines-offline-data-to-target-online-ads, Commercial Alert, Oct. 17, 2007, pp. 3. |
demographicsnow.com, sample reports, “Age Rank Report”, Jul. 17, 2006, 3 pages. |
demographicsnow.com, sample reports, “Consumer Expenditure Summary Report”, Jul. 17, 2006, 3 pages. |
demographicsnow.com, sample reports, “Income Comparison Report”, Jul. 17, 2006, 4 pages. |
Dolnicar, Sara, “Using Cluster Analysis for Market Segmentation—Typical Misconceptions, Established Methodological Weaknesses and Some Recommendations for Improvement,” Australasian Journal of Market Research, 2003, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 5-12. |
Downey, Sarah A., “Smile, you're on Spokeo.com! Concerned? (here's what to do)”, https://www.abine.com/blog/2011/how-to-remove-yourself-from-spokeo/, as posted Jan. 13, 2011 in 7 pages. |
Drawbridge, “Customer Success”, http://www.drawbrid.ge/customer-success, printed May 7, 2015 in 17 pages. |
Drawbridge, “Solutions”, http://www.drawbrid.ge/solutions, printed May 7, 2015 in 5 pages. |
Drawbridge, “Technology”, http://www.drawbrid.ge/technology, printed May 7, 2015 in 3 pages. |
Dstillery, “Products”, http://dstillery.com/how-we-do-it/products/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Dstillery, “What We Do”, http://dstillery.com/what-we-do/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Dstillery, “Who We Are”, http://dstillery.com/who-we-are/, printed May 7, 2015 in 2 pages. |
Dymi, Amilda, Need for Leads Spurs Some Upgrades, Origination News-Special Report, May 1, 2008, Vol. vol. 17, Issue No. 8, Pages p. 24, Atlanta, Copyright 2008 SourceMedia, Inc. |
Egol, Len; “What's New in Database Marketing Software,” Direct, Aug. 1994, vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 39. |
“Epsilon Leads Discussion on Paradigm Shift in TV Advertising,” epsilon.com, Jun. 24, 2004, 2 pages, http://www.epsilon.com/who-pr_tvad040624.html. |
Experian and AGS Select SRC to Deliver Complete Marketing Solutions; Partnership First to Marketplace with Census2000 Data. PR Newswire. New York: Mar. 21, 2001. p. 1. |
“Experian Launches Portfolio Monitor—Owner NoticesSM”, News Release, Feb. 2003, Costa Mesa, CA. |
Fanelli, Marc, “Building a Holistic Customer View”, MultiChannel Merchant, Jun. 26, 2006, pp. 2. |
Findermind, “PeopleFinders Review”, as archived Jun. 1, 2012 in 4 pages. http://web.archive.org/web/20120601010134/http://www.findermind.com/tag/peoplefinders-review/. |
Frontporch, “Ad Networks—Partner with Front Porch!,” www.frontporch.com printed Apr. 2008 in 2 pages. |
Frontporch, “New Free Revenue for Broadband ISPs!”, http://www.frontporch.com/html/bt/FPBroadbandISPs.pdf printed May 28, 2008 in 2 pages. |
“FTC Testifies: Identity Theft on the Rise”, FTC News Release, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 3. |
Georges, et al., “KDD'99 Competition: Knowledge Discovery Contest”, SAS Institute, 1999, 6 pages. |
Gilje, Shelby, “Keeping Tabs on Businesses That Keep Tabs on Us”, NewsRoom, The Seattle Times, Section: SCENE, Apr. 19, 1995, pp. 4. |
Gonul, et al., “Optimal Mailing of Catalogs: A New Methodology Using Estimable Structural Dynamic Programming Models”, 14 pages, Management Science, vol. 44, No. 9, Sep. 1998. |
Halliday, Jean, “Ford Recruits Accenture for Marketing Plan,” Automotive News Feb. 13, 2006, 2 pages, Crain Communications. |
Hartfeil, Guenther, “Bank One Measures Profitability of Customers, Not Just Products,” Journal of Retail Banking Services, Aug. 1996, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 23-29. |
Haughton et al., “Direct Marketing Modeling with CART and CHAID”, Journal of Direct Marketing, Fall 1997, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 42-52. |
Helm, Burt, “Nielsen's New Ratings Yardstick,” businessweek.com, Jun. 20, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060620_054223.htm. |
Hill, Kerry, “Identity Theft Your Social Security Number Provides Avenue for Thieves”, NewsRoom, Wisconsin State Journal, Sep. 13, 1998, pp. 4. |
Hinman, Donald P., “The Perfect Storm: Response Metrics and Digital TV,” chiefmarketer.com, May 17, 2006, 2 pages, http://www.chiefmarketer.com/crm_loop/roi/perfect-storm-051706/index.html. |
Information Resources, Inc. and Navic Networks Form Joint Relationship to Support Next Generation of Technology for Advertising Testing, IRI Expands BehaviorScan® Solution to Meet Digital and On-demand Needs, Feb. 27, 2006, http://us.infores.com/page/news/pr/pr_archive?mode=single&pr_id=117, printed Oct. 4, 2007 in 2 pages. |
“Intelligent Miner Applications Guide”, IBM Corp., Apr. 2, 1999, Chapters 4-7, pp. 33-132. |
“IRI and Acxiom Introduce More Efficient and Actionable Approach to Consumer Segmentation and Targeted Marketing,” eu-marketingportal.de, Jan. 26, 2006, 2 pages, http://www.eu-marketingportal.de. |
Jost, Allen; Neural Networks, Credit World, Mar./Apr. 1993, vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 26-33. |
Karlan et al., “Observing Unobservables:Identifying Information Asymmetries with a Consumer Credit Field Experiment”, Jun. 17, 2006, pp. 58, http://aida.econ.yale.edu/karlan/papers/ObservingUnobservables.KarlanZinman.pdf. |
Lamons, Bob, “Be Smart: Offer Inquiry Qualification Services,” Marketing News, ABI/Inform Global, Nov. 6, 1995, vol. 29, No. 23, pp. 13. |
LeadVerifier: Why Should You Use LeadVerifier?, downloaded from www.leadverifier.com/LeadVerifier_Why.asp, dated Feb. 7, 2006 on www.archive.org. |
Leskovec, Jure, “Social Media Analytics: Tracking, Modeling and Predicting the Flow of Information through Networks”, WWW 2011—Tutorial, Mar. 28-Apr. 1, 2011, Hyderabad, India, pp. 277-278. |
LifeLock, http://web.archive.org/web/20110724011010/http://www.lifelock.com/? as archived Jul. 24, 2011 in 1 page. |
Littwin, Angela, “Beyond Usury: A Study of Credit-Card Use and Preference Among Low-Income Consumers”, Texas Law Review, vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 451-506; Feb. 2008. |
Longo, Tracey, “Managing Money: Your Family Finances”, Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine, Jun. 1, 1995, vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 4. |
Loshin, Intelligent Enterprise: Better Insight for Business Decisions, “Value-Added Data: Merge Ahead”, Feb. 9, 2000, vol. 3, No. 3, 5 pages. |
McManus et al.; “Street Wiser,” American Demographics; ABI/Inform Global; Jul./Aug. 2003; 25, 6; pp. 32-35. |
McNamara, Paul, “Start-up's pitch: The Envelope, please,” Network World, Apr. 28, 1997, vol. 14, No. 17, p. 33. |
“Mediamark Research Inc. Releases Findings From Mobile Marketing Consumer Study; Outback Steakhouse and Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Among Brands Participating in Mobile Marketing Research,” www.thefreelibrary.com, May 9, 2006, 4 pages. |
Morrissey, Brian, “Aim High: Ad Targeting Moves to the Next Level”, ADWEEK, dated Jan. 21, 2008 as downloaded from http://www.adweek.com/aw/magazine/article_display.isp?vnu on Apr. 16, 2008. |
Muus, et al., “A Decision Theoretic Framework for Profit Maximization in Direct Marketing”, Sep. 1996, pp. 20. |
NebuAd, “Venture Capital: What's New—The Latest on Technology Deals From Dow Jones VentureWire”, Press Release, http://www.nebuad.com/company/media_coverage/media_10_22_07.php, Oct. 22, 2007, pp. 2. |
“New FICO score extends lenders' reach to credit-underserved millions”, Viewpoints: News, Ideas and Solutions from Fair Isaac, Sep./Oct. 2004 as downloaded from http://www.fairisaac.com/NR/exeres/F178D009-B47A-444F-BD11-8B4D7D8B3532,frame . . . in 6 pages. |
“New Privista Product Provides Early Warning System to Combat Identity Theft”, PR Newswire, Oct. 24, 2000, PR Newswire Association, Inc., New York. |
Otter, et al., “Direct Mail Selection by Joint Modeling of the Probability and Quantity of Response”, Jun. 1997, pp. 14. |
Polatoglu et al., “Theory and Methodology, Probability Distributions of Cost, Revenue and Profit over a Warranty Cycle”, European Journal of Operational Research, Jul. 1998, vol. 108, Issue 1, pp. 170-183. |
“PostX to Present at Internet Showcase”, PR Newswire, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 2. |
PostX, “PostX® Envelope and ActiveView”, http://web.archive.org/web/19970714203719/http://www.postx.com/priducts_fm.html, Jul. 14, 1997 (retrieved Nov. 7, 2013) in 2 pages. |
PR Web: Press Release Newswire, Anchor Launches LeadVerifier to Verify, Correct and Enhance Internet Leads, Jul. 19, 2005, pp. 2 pages, Farmingdale, NY. |
Predictive Behavioral Targeting http://www.predictive-behavioral-targeting.com/index.php.Main_Page as printed Mar. 28, 2008 in 4 pages. |
PrivacyGuard, http://web.archive.org/web/20110728114049/http://www.privacyguard.com/ as archived Jul. 28, 2011 in 1 page. |
Punj et al., “Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application,” Journal of Marketing Research, May 1983, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 134-148. |
Reinbach, Andrew, “MCIF Aids Banks in CRA Compliance”, Bank Systems & Technology, Aug. 1995, vol. 32, No. 8, p. 27. |
Rossi et al.; “The Value of Purchasing History Data in Target Marketing”; Marketing Science, Apr. 1996, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 321-340. |
Schmittlein et al., “Customer Base Analysis: An Industrial Purchase Process Application”, Marketing Science, vol. 13, No. 1, Winter 1994, pp. 41-67. |
Smith, Richard M., “The Web Bug FAQ”, Nov. 11, 1999, Version 1.0, pp. 4. |
“SRC Announces Free Dashups to Mashups Adding Geographic Business Intelligence at Web Speed to the Enterprise on www.FreeDemographics.com/API,” directionsmag.com, Jun. 12, 2006, 3 pages, http://www.directionsmag.com/press.releases/index.php?duty=Show&id=1. |
“SRC Delivers Industry's First Drive Time Engine Developed to Follow Actual Road Networks,” thomasnet.com, May 21, 2006, 4 pages, http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/485722. |
Stein, Benchmarking Default Prediction Models: Pitfalls and Remedies in Model Validation, Moody's KMV, Revised Jun. 13, 2002, Technical Report #020305; New York. |
Sweat, Jeff; “Know Your Customers,” Information Week, Nov. 30, 1998, pp. 20. |
Tao, Lixin, “Shifting Paradigms with the Application Service Provider Model”; Concordia University, IEEE, Oct. 2001, Canada. |
TARGUSinfo: Lead Verification, Verify Your Leads With Unique Accuracy and Ease, downloaded from www.targusinfo.com/solutions/verify/Default.asp, as printed Aug. 1, 2006. |
TARGUSinfo: Solutions: Services: Verify Express—Verify, Correct and Enhance Customer Provided Data, downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20051028122545/http://www.targusinfo.com/solutions/services/verify/, Oct. 28, 2005, as printed Apr. 30, 2011, 27 pgs. |
Thoemmes, Felix, “Propensity Score Matching in SPSS”, Center for Educational Science and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Jan. 2012. |
TransUnion, “DecisionEdge | MobileCredit”, https://www.transunion.co.za/resources/transunion-za/doc/product/resources/product-decisionedge-acquisition-mobilecredit-as.pdf, 2015, pp. 2. |
UPI, “Nielsen Media Research goes electronic,” Jun. 14, 2006, 1 page. |
“VOD Integration Now Available in Strata: Buyers / Sellers Benefit from VOD Component on Popular Platform,” stratag.com, Feb. 21, 2006, 1 page, http://www.stratag.com/news/mediapress022106.html. |
Warshaw, Paul R., “A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein”, Journal of Marketing Research, May 1980, vol. XVII, pp. 153-172. |
Webber, Richard, “The Relative Power of Geodemographics vis a vis Person and Household Level Demographic Variables as Discriminators of Consumer Behavior,” CASA:Working Paper Series, http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper84.pdf, Oct. 2004, pp. 17. |
White, Ron, “How Computers Work”, Millennium Edition, Que Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, Sep. 1999, pp. 284. |
Whitney, Daisy; Atlas Positioning to Shoulder VOD Ads; Campaign Management Tools Optimize Inventory, TelevisionWeek, May 23, 2005, 3 pages. |
Wyner, “Customer valuation: Linking behavior and economics”, Aug. 1996, Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management & Applications vol. 8, No. 2 pp. 36-38. |
Yoon, Chang Woo; “Vicarious Certification and Billing Agent for Web Information Service”, High Spped Network Access Section, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Jan. 21-23, 1998, pp. 344-349. |
Yun et al., “An Efficient Clustering Algorithm for Market Basket Data Based on Small Large Ratios,” Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oct. 2001, pp. 505-510. |
Zen et al., “Value-Added Internet: a Pragmatic TINA-Based Path to the Internet and PSTN Integration”, Global Convergence of Telecommunications and Distribute Object Computing, Nov. 17-20, 1997, pp. 10. |
Declaration of Paul Clark, DSc. for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,504,628 (Symantec Corporation, Petitioner), dated Jan. 15, 2014 in 76 pages. |
Exhibit D to Joint Claim Construction Statement, filed in Epsilon Data Management, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-00511-JRG (E.D. Tex.) (combined for pretrial purposes with RPost Holdings. Inc., et al. v. Experian Marketing Solutions. Inc., No. 2:12-cv-00513-JRG (E.D. Tex.)) Filed Jan. 14, 2014 in 9 pages. |
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. and Rpost Communications Limited V. Constant Contact, Inc.; et al.) filed Feb. 11, 2013 in 14 pages. |
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-511-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. and Rpost Communications Limited V. Epsilon Data Management, LLC.) filed Sep. 13, 2013 in 9 pages. |
First Amended Complaint in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-513-JRG (Rpost Holdings, Inc. and Rpost Communications Limited V. Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc.) filed Aug. 30, 2013 in 9 pages. |
Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review in U.S. Pat. No. 8,161,104 (Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc., Epsilon Data Management, LLC, and Constant Contact, Inc., v. Rpost Communications Limited) dated Jan. 29, 2014 in 90 pages. |
Source Code Appendix attached to U.S. App. No. 08/845,722 by Venkatraman et al., Exhibit A, Part 1 & 2, pp. 32. |
Official Communication in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,381,349, dated May 17, 2013. |
Official Communication in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,381,349, dated Jul. 31, 2014. |
International Preliminary Examination Report in International Application No. PCT/US00/21453 dated Jun. 26, 2001. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2007/021815, dated Sep. 5, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/064594, dated Oct. 30, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2008/064594, dated Dec. 10, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2008/083939, dated Jan. 29, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US09/60393, dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Jun. 23, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2010/034434, dated Feb. 4, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Nov. 21, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/052342, dated Feb. 5, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/048265, dated Dec. 5, 2017. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2017/048265, dated Mar. 7, 2019. |
Greitsch, Philipp, “Beginner's Guide to Location-Based Mobile Advertising”, https://trendblog.net/beginners-guide-location-based-mobile-advertising/, Mar. 8, 2013, pp. 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15791331 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 17071915 | US | |
Parent | 15621142 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 15791331 | US | |
Parent | 15292861 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 15621142 | US | |
Parent | 13689425 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 15292861 | US | |
Parent | 10881436 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 13689425 | US |