The invention relates to a system of a separable frame for presses and accordingly constructed press frames, wherein the respective press frame includes uprights and head piece as an upper cross-connection and a press table as a lower cross-connection which form as structural units a closed frame receiving static and dynamic forces for any necessary functions of a press, such as driving a ram for shaping using tools. Such frame-like press frames, also referred to as O-shaped press frames, are suitable for presses of all sizes and types and differ among other things depending on their design as a two-column presses and as a column design with four columns or in multi-ram presses as “two plus two times the number of ram”-columns.
The invention also relates to a computer program and a control and regulating device for the system of the press frame.
DE 102013108299 B4 describes a press frame together with a method for assembling the same and a press. In particular for a forging press, this press frame has an upper beam, also referred to as head piece, and a lower beam as a lower cross-connection with uprights arranged between upper beam and the lower beam. The upper and lower beams are braced against each other with tie rods, with the uprights being interposed.
The development of such O-shaped press frames can be traced from a one-piece frame made of cast iron to a multi-piece frame made of welded structural units. On the one hand, those press frames were already designed to be horizontally separable in order to be able to bypass the transitions (radii) between the head piece (upper beam) and lateral stands (uprights), which are critical in terms of strength and tension in the originally cast frame. On the other hand, monobloc frames made of cast material were then already braced with tie rods when the material properties of the casting material, for example with regard to the primary stiffness of the press to be achieved, needed to be compensated and/or improved.
In particular in the case of forming, cutting or punching presses, such or similarly constructed press frames have to accommodate rotary or translational drives for rams that perform lifting motions and are equipped with upper tools and act against tables having lower tools.
As frames of this type, the press frames are to be designed commensurate with the complex operating forces. This applies to all press frames used, for example, for the species single press, transfer presses, press lines, multi-ram presses, multiple-die presses.
To absorb these complex forces, press frame constructions have been developed where the interposed uprights are prestressed with tie rods against the upper cross-connection (such as the head piece) and the lower cross-connection (such as the press table).
In order to be able to control the forces caused by the working pressure and acting on the machine body, heavy presses have increasingly been equipped with tie rods, as documented, inter alia, in DE 1938279 A, DE 2239147 A, DE 2818511 C2, DE 3007975 C2 and EP 262 593 B1.
These tie rods are intended to prevent the loss of the prestressing force between the individual components as a result of the tensile load on the frame during, for example, a forming process, for example prevent the so-called lifting of the head piece from the uprights.
It is known that a residual clamping force of the tie rod connection and thus an overload protection of a conventional frame can be defined with sufficient accuracy by setting the prestress.
The reason for the use of tie rods is generally to influence elastic changes in shape such as the deflection and stresses in components of the machine system subject to complex loads.
A realization has emerged that the significant proportion of damage caused by dynamic loads in individual components of the press frame has to be countered.
Finally, this led to the conclusion to reduce the deflection of the press frame by preloading a tie rod.
However, the resulting effect, that the tension rod preload influences the static load and the residual clamping force, masked the problem of investigating significant parameters concerning the accuracy of the press and primarily the spring-back and dynamic loading of the press frame, which are decisive for the fatigue strength of a press and the useful value on the operator side.
In addition to the dynamic and static load criteria, the specialist and designer developing a press frame must also take the following into account:
Overall, logistically complex conditions have to be met in order to be able to assemble the heavy and large components with their associated high transport costs on-site without any problems and to be able to dismantle them for maintenance or repair, while saving time and material. In addition, preassembly of such components in a cost-saving manner should also be possible.
The generic press frames must therefore be constructed so that not only the parts that determine the function of a press are relevant, but also the structural units of the respective press frame as complete or partially pre-assembled units, can be initially transported worldwide after being produced in a factory in a cost-effective and space-optimized manner and then installed on-site at an operator's site to form a fully functioning press in a technologically favorable manner.
Lastly, the development of the workpieces to be processed into high-strength sheet metal and the increased complexity of the tools entail new demands on the presses.
According to JP 2000332 500 A, the following has been proposed for easy assembly of a frame structure for a press:
The separated uprights are braced against the upper and lower intermediate and vertically extended separation of the cross-connection with tie rods. The horizontal separation of the O-frame in the uprights is extended in the vertical separation in the headpiece body, resulting in shorter headpiece bodies, which are technologically and logistically advantageous.
Tests show that the objectionable damage in the prior art press frames caused by the press operation mainly occurred in the cross-connections and uprights, but not in the tie rods.
From a technological point of view, it is remarkable that the tie rods are made from high-quality forged materials and, due to the structural features (height of the upper cross-connection plus height of the columns plus height of the lower cross-connection plus height of the tie rod nuts), have a considerable length. This results in a specifically high expenditure of material and assembly costs. The press operator requires tall buildings with deep cellar pits to accommodate the overall height of the presses. Conversely, the uprights of the press frame can be made of less valuable materials in order to satisfy the welding production processes and a permanent absorption of the dynamic load.
The press frame, analyzed in this way with the focus on different aspects, can be described as follows:
Overall, the professional world has thus accepted a design practice of joining the press frame of a press consisting of uprights and cross-connections that absorb the static and dynamic forces for any required press functions and tools in form of a closed frame by way of expensive tie rod bracing, in order to counteract the damaging proportions of dynamic loads in the columns and cross-connections.
In the automotive industry, efforts are being made to reduce moving masses, for example by increasing the use of aluminum materials or fiber composite materials. Alternatively, steel materials are still used. Since, however, weight savings can only be achieved with thinner starting materials and thus thinner components, the strength of the material must be increased in order to meet safety and strength aspects, namely by processing so-called high-strength sheet metal.
This places increased demands on forming machines such as presses with respect to accuracy parameters and required pressing forces.
Accordingly, the conventional design has to be reinforced both with respect to the cross-section of the tie rods and the cross-sections of a press frame or its uprights, which disadvantageously increases the cost of the press.
Further references are JP 2005-279 747 A, JP 2003-230 993 A, CN 2 500 469 Y, CN 201 394 915 Y, CN 202 045 910 U, WO 2009/064 500 A1, CN 201 264 376 Y or DE 103 44 635 A1.
In order to be able to satisfy the problem of the higher pressing forces, the required accuracies and economic aspects, it is an object of the invention to create a press frame with controllable stress states resulting from the press operation, the components of which can in a technologically advantageous manner be joined to form a frame that absorbs the dynamically and statically acting forces, wherein the press frame has an increased fatigue strength and a reduced vertical elastic deflection according to velz while optimizing material use.
In this case, parts or structural units of a respective press frame should be transportable worldwide in a cost-effective and space-optimized manner as complete or partially prefabricated structural units after their manufacture, with technologically inexpensive on-site assembly into a fully functioning press.
Moreover, a computer program and a control and regulating device shall be created from the synergies resulting from the system of the press frame.
The combination of tie rod stiffness, column stiffness and stiffness of the cross-connections is important for the overall stiffness of the press frame forming the frame.
From the point of view of an expert, the deflection is to be considered more strictly as a distinctive accuracy parameter of the press, as it characterizes the maximum, vertical and elastic deformation of the frame during the press operation and is characteristic of the overall stiffness of the uprights that are braced with tie rods and screw connections.
The aforementioned stiffness is determined by the modulus of elasticity, the height of the components and the size of the effective cross-sections. It should be noted here that the selected steel material already has the highest modulus of elasticity of the materials under consideration, so that the modulus of elasticity can no longer be increased.
The component height of the press frame is, on the one hand, functionally determined by the geometry of the workpiece to be manufactured, and, on the other hand, physically determined by the dimensions of the components required to control and absorb the acting forces.
To improve the elastic properties of the press frame, the designers have only the option of affecting the dimensions of the cross sections and the associated cost through the use of the employed materials.
For an understanding of the invention and in accordance with the different press types specified at the beginning, a distinction should be made between the following arrangements of frames in a press frame:
According to the invention recited in claim 1, a system of a frame for presses includes structural units with uprights, an upper cross-connection with the head piece and a lower cross-connection with a press table, forming a closed and detachably assembled frame absorbing static and dynamic forces of the presses, wherein
According to this system, it should be emphasized that, due to the symmetrical deformability, commensurate with the operating force introduced asymmetrically into the uprights, different cross-sectional regions corresponding to the acting press forces can be created, with the press frame experiencing a reduced vertical deflection.
Compared to the prior art analyzed above, i.e. where the press frames are joined by tie rod bracing, this is new and inventive from a structural and functional point of view, since hitherto
Commensurate with the object of the invention, namely to construct the press frame having elevated fatigue strength with a reduced elastic vertical deflection while at the same time optimizing the use of materials, alternatively according to claim 2, a system of a press frame that includes uprights, an upper cross-connection with the head piece and a lower cross-connection with structural units including the press table and that forms a closed and detachably joined frame that absorbs static and dynamic forces of the presses, in which the reduced vertical deflection can be designed according to the relationship v2≤1/n*v1, wherein n=(s+k)/(s+1) and
This system is based on the more complex concept of considering a techno-economic (advantage-) factor composed of a cost factor and a stiffness ratio and investigating its relationship with the deflection behavior, which will be explained in more detail below in connection with the inventive-technical result or the structural and functional relationship.
Both systems are constructed with the features recited in dependent claims 3 to 11.
The following analytical considerations are relevant for realizing the press frame with uprights lacking tie rods in accordance with the invention according to claim 1 or claim 2:
All interacting parts of the press frame undergo a deformation under the pressing force, in particular due to asymmetrical forces acting on the uprights as a result of the bending of the table, ram and head piece, which thus tend to deform in the direction of the tool (center) and form a so-called hourglass effect.
Therefore, when designing a press, the stiffness of the components ram and table that cooperate directly with a tool is specifically dimensioned so as to ensure conventional deflection values of, for example, 0.125 mm/meter mounting surface in the ram and the table. The head piece, on the other hand, is dimensioned for a permissible tension and deforms more than the table. This design results in an asymmetric structure in the press.
With the inventive system, this effect is counteracted by an adapted design of the employed material cross-sections. The uprights exposed to the pressing force can thereby be influenced in such a way that they are deformed less or are deformed more symmetrically than with the classic press design.
With off-center loads, pairs of uprights are unevenly loaded because, for example, higher pressing forces occur on the inlet side than on the outlet side. The uprights on the inlet side deform more than those on the outlet side. Especially with transfer presses, this effect is predetermined in the production process. This asymmetry requires for the tool a correspondingly lengthy start-up associated with increased tool wear, wherein also a ram guide disposed on the uprights, which is specified in parallel with the construction and has a small guide play, is exposed to these loads. The stiffness can be influenced through specific asymmetrical dimensioning of the uprights, thereby counteracting possible adverse effects.
Alternatively, the uprights can also be designed with variable cross-sections by using additional activatable components, such as bracing elements, in order to adapt the stiffness and asymmetrical dimensioning of the press frame to different areas of tool use with correspondingly different requirements.
The aim is also to maintain the ram guide as parallel (symmetrical) as possible with the smallest possible guide play to ensure a high quality of the parts to be produced, such as workpieces, and a long service life of the tools with low wear.
In addition, a possible asymmetrical design of the uprights with an off-center operating force results in a more even load distribution, i.e. more homogeneous stress conditions in the uprights, which results in a higher fatigue strength of the uprights.
The aim is to avoid asymmetrical deformation of the uprights (relative to one another) under the operating force, in particular caused by an off-center operating force. The uprights guide the path of the ram (ram guide) with attached guide strips, in order to counteract an inclined position of the ram, such as tilting, and thus of the upper tool.
The respective system which is characterized by an optimally modified geometric separation of the press frame and without bracing with tie rods can be modified with constructional features and details of a press frame recited in the dependent claim 12 bis 29.
This obviates the need for expensive components which result in high costs not only in the procurement, but also in the manufacture, assembly and transportation. Thus, the respective system according to the invention surprisingly no more capital investment compared to conventional constructions by optimizing the sheet metal thickness in the uprights and components of the press frame and the technical effect of less elastic deformation—in particular the vertical deflection. Lower stress amplitudes, which in turn reduce the weld seam stress in the welded components, have an advantageous effect. In addition to the advantageous use of the press, this also results in a longer service life for the welded parts.
Advantageously, with a comparable size of the installation space for the tools and of the functional work areas and with a comparable total use of materials, the external dimensions of the presses as a frame construction without tie rods can be reduced. Furthermore, the size and weight of structural units such as the cross-connections can be limited or reduced, so that technological processing (stress-relieving annealing) and logistical operations using transport systems can be carried out more cost-effectively and in a space-saving manner (cranes, bridges, roads).
The higher overall stiffness of the presses achieved with the invention in the vertical direction (by optimizing the column cross-sections) and also in the horizontal direction, reinforced by the use of transverse and longitudinal traverses, has an advantageous effect on the ram guide, thus dispensing with internal guides in the tool.
Similarly, the play (clearance) of the ram guide can be affected during the effective time of a maximum operating force. In conventional presses, the stress in the columns is relieved during the forming process, with the columns deforming in an undefined direction with an undefined magnitude. In presses without tie rods, the columns tend to move during the forming process due to the tensile load towards the center of the tool and cause a reduction in the guide play, which may make an internal guide in the tool unnecessary.
The press frames without tie rods constructed according to the invention enable various new design options when setting up the press system. By eliminating the anchor nuts on the lower cross-connection, for example, the spring elements of the vibration-isolated installation can be positioned for optimized vibration insulation.
By extending the uprights downward, the concrete foundation supports in the basement can be dispensed with, i.e. the frame is located, vibration-isolated with spring elements, directly on the floor of a press pit foundation.
According to claim 30, with the invention, a program step for determining the reduced vertical spring deflection v can be integrated in a computer program for the structural design of
Finally, the invention includes according to claims 31 and 32 a control and regulating device for the system, which is used to evaluate data of the loads recorded in the system by a corresponding measuring means in a computer and to input data for executing controlling/regulating technical measures relating to the elastic behavior of components of the press frame, in particular for the active bracing of stiffness-relevant cross sections of the uprights by using activatable clamping elements.
For clarification the inventive systems compared with the prior art analyzed above,
The designations in the diagram are as follows:
This is based on the stiffness ratio s of the upright 2 (upright) and the tie rods 6 (tie rod) of, for example, 1.5:1, which is customary in press technology. Thus, the tie rods 6 experience the dynamic load proportion and the uprights 2 experience the dynamic load proportion corresponding to this stiffness ratio s. With a conventional preload of, for example, 1.3×pressing force Fp1, the spring deflection v1 can be deduced.
The diagram illustrates the unfavorable conventional distribution of the dynamic load on conventional tie rods and uprights because the tie rod, which was previously made of higher quality material, absorbs a lower dynamic load than the upright. The 1.5:1 stiffness ratio s of upright 2 to tie rod 6 causes a dynamic load distribution of 1.5:1 and thus prevents an optimized load distribution for the uprights. To increase stiffness, the tie rods 6 are therefore constructed of a more expensive/higher-load-bearing material than the uprights 2.
The preload achieved with the tie rods 6 has the disadvantage that, with an unchanged pressing force Fp1 and with an unchanged specified deflection v1, only a so-called residual clamping force is increased. If a higher pressing force Fp1 is required, a correspondingly higher deflection v1 must be accepted, which, for example, adversely affects the forming process.
Depending on the design, cavities/through holes are provided in uprights and cross-connections, such as the head piece and press table, and adequately dimensioned contact surfaces for the anchor nuts are provided on the head piece and the press table. A reinforcement/enlargement of the diameter of the tie rods would likewise result in an enlargement of the upright and/or of the external dimensions of the system, which due to the material consumption disadvantageously increases the financial outlay to be invested.
This development trend is, on the other hand, contravened by the system according to the invention of a frame for presses according to
This system is based on more complex detailed considerations, according to which a relation of a factor n=(s+k)/(s+1) was created, which is based on a
From this combined consideration which merges economic and technical issues of these characteristic parameters “k” and “s” and with the same financial investment as for the conventional design, the diagram according to
In the diagram denote (in comparison to
Conversely,
This system of a frame for presses is completed in the press frame 1 with the following features, either alone or in combination:
The particular design features or properties are realized or characterized in the press frame 1 by the following features, either individually or in combination:
Furthermore, according to the invention, this press frame 1 can be designed with the following special features:
Only with the inventive system can the press frame 1 advantageously be constructed as a releasably joined frame, due to the uprights 2 having mutually different heights L and/or by upper and lower cross-connections 3, 4 having mutually different widths b.
This makes it possible, provided that the uprights 2 with the length L laterally or longitudinally can be joined with the cross-connections 3, 4 by way of non-positive or non-positive and positive joining geometries 5 and releasable connecting means 5.1 in abutment without tie rod bracing, to employ for special cases and/or different press genres, types, and arrangements, for example in multi-ram presses, press lines, multi-stage presses, transfer presses,
The press frame 1 can advantageously be also designed
The usable cavities created by virtue of the elimination of the tie rods, allow vibration-damping materials, such as granulate and sand, to be embedded in the uprights 2.
In addition, the elimination of the tie rods together with anchor bolts allows more constructive freedom in design/location of the mounting surfaces of the press table, so that a vibration-isolating installation (spring elements) can be optimally placed and dimensioned, due to the elimination of previously necessary costly and time-consuming tightening of the anchor nuts for final structural unit at the site of the operator using a clamping device, which must be transported back and forth.
At a comparable and required deflection v, this means that the upright 2 assumes a stiffness that corresponds at least to the overall stiffness of the tensioned system according to
Thus, the load-bearing walls of the uprights 2 can be reinforced inwardly by using thicker metal sheets up to and including a design representing a solid stand.
The typical cross section of the uprights 2 may be designed to have a partially open or closed, symmetrical or asymmetrical shape so as to specifically affect the deformation of the upright 2 or accommodate the function modules 7 in a space-optimized manner.
The play of the ram guide on the press is specifically influenced by designing the stiffness of certain sections in the uprights 2 such that advantageously a small play can be set during or shortly before the forming process.
When a non-uniform/asymmetrical distribution of the pressing force is required due to the use of special multi-stage tools or with multi-ram presses, the uprights 2 may thereafter be differently dimensioned corresponding to the load distribution.
Empty cavities in the uprights 2 can be used for other purposes, in order to implement in accordance with
Functional structural units 7 of the press automation can be integrated between two uprights 2 as a supporting/stiffening part of the press frame 1. At the same time, a three-part unit as a preassembled structural unit would make assembly work easier for the operator.
The time and money required to assemble and transport a press plant could be reduced; costly hydraulic auxiliary devices for the previously required clamping by way of tie rods 6 and anchor nuts are eliminated.
The reduced spatial requirements for production halls and operator buildings lead to significant cost reductions.
According to the invention, to refine the design, a program step for the determination of the reduced vertical deflection v2 according to the relationship v21/n*v1 can be integrated in a computer program for constructing
A control and regulating device for the system according to the invention of a frame for presses includes
The scope of the invention includes the targeted use of less expensive materials that can be processed very easily in terms of welding technology and are available worldwide.
The maximum weight and dimensions of the individual components produced according to the invention up to an entire press system in a press plant can be reduced.
The system according to the invention with the targeted change in the stiffness of the press frames by eliminating the vertical preloading makes the application of the presses more flexible or expands of their field of application.
The change in the stiffness of the uprights by activating, deactivating or changing additional tensionable cross-sections of the uprights allows the press frame to be optimally adapted to
The selective use of material in determinable cross-sectional areas of the uprights to increase their stiffness increases the use-value for the press operator, both when the processing of high strength parts and also with respect to the critical cutting stroke when using cutting tools.
Elimination or reduction of the guide rods in the tool results in a structural simplification of the employed tools, which enables a more favorable workpiece transport and reduces tool costs.
Fp2
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 001 285.2 | Feb 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2020/100083 | 2/8/2020 | WO | 00 |