1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to the financial service and card product industries, and, more particularly, to systems, computer program products, and associated methods of providing an automatic credit line draw in preselected increments for a prepaid card.
2. Background
Millions of prepaid cards are issued each year in the United States. It is known that many consumers rely primarily on cash and a prepaid card account for their personal finances; these consumers often do not have a traditional checking, savings, or other bank deposit account, and they usually do not write checks. These consumers typically do not have a credit card.
It is also known to use a prepaid card as payment for a proposed purchase at a merchant. The consumer proposes a purchase and submits the prepaid card to the merchant so that the merchant can request authorization from a prepaid card processor associated with the prepaid card. That is, the merchant checks that funds are available in the account associated with the prepaid card to cover the amount of the proposed purchase. This authorization process also provides an opportunity for security services, such as, for example, determining if the prepaid card has been reported as stolen. If there are insufficient funds available in the account associated with the prepaid card to cover the amount of the proposed purchase, the authorization request is denied by the prepaid card processor, and the proposed purchase is rejected by the merchant. Embarrassed and disappointed, many rejected consumers quickly give up and leave the merchant's premises so that even if a loan or credit were readily available with minimal effort, such as, for example, by placing a short phone call to the prepaid card processor or to a lender, the proposed purchase is abandoned.
It is known that consumers can receive a loan without having a bank account and that proceeds from a loan can be credited to or posted to a prepaid card. Loans, including, e.g., payday loans, payday advances, and other short-term cash advances, however, involve hassles of applying for and obtaining the loan prior to the consumer having access to the funds. In addition, inherent in requesting a loan is determining the amount of the loan. If the loan amount is too small, the consumer may need to obtain an additional loan, with additional fees; if the loan amount is too large, the consumer will needlessly pay extra interest.
In view of the foregoing, Applicant has recognized one or more sources of many of these problems and provides enhanced embodiments of methods, e.g., computerized methods, of advancing one or more preselected loan increments to a prepaid card, and associated systems and computer program products. According to embodiments of the present invention, a lending institution prequalifies a consumer for a line of credit for a prepaid card responsive to consumer underwriting data and predetermined qualification parameters, makes available draws to the line of credit line in an authorization stream for a proposed purchase using the prepaid card as payment, and loads a prepaid card in preselected loan increments so that the prepaid card then has a new amount that exceeds or equals the value of a proposed purchase. Next, for example, a new value for the line of credit balance available is determined, accounting for value loaded onto the prepaid card and a preselected loan advance fee for each loan increment loaded onto the prepaid card.
Embodiments of the present invention provide, for example, a computer-implemented method of advancing one or more preselected loan increments to a prepaid card. The computer-implemented method includes initiating consumer engagement of predetermined prepaid card approval and authorizing advancing of one or more preselected loan increments by the consumer upon approval by a lending institution up to a preauthorized total loan value. The preauthorized total loan value represents a maximum amount of value available to the consumer from the lending institution via a line of credit associated with the prepaid card as understood by those skilled in the art. The computer-implemented method also includes using the predetermined prepaid card to propose a purchase of one or more items, determining an amount of value of proposed purchase (including, for example, coupons, discounts, instant rebates, sales tax, or a combination thereof as understood by those skilled in the art), determining an amount of value on the predetermined prepaid card, and determining difference in amount of value of proposed purchase and the amount of value on the predetermined prepaid card. The computer-implemented method includes loading the predetermined prepaid card with an additional value equal to one or more preselected loan increments so that the prepaid card then has a new amount totaling the amount previously on the prepaid card plus the one or more preselected loan increments and so that the new amount exceeds or, alternatively, equals the value of the proposed purchase. The computer-implemented method also includes determining a predetermined loan advance fee for each increment of the one or more increments from the preauthorized total loan value.
According to other embodiments of the present invention, the consumer initiating engagement of approval can include, for example, the consumer opting in to a program with the lending institution using a written correspondence from the consumer, a consumer selection on a website, a telephone conversation with an interactive voice response unit, a telephone conversation with a customer service representative, a mobile phone, or a combination thereof as understood by those skilled in the art. That is, embodiments of the present invention provide numerous flexible and convenient ways to initiate consumer engagement of predetermined prepaid card approval. A line of credit amount, for example, can be established based on direct deposit and preselected underwriting formula, as understood by those skilled in the art, that use the amount of direct deposits, among other factors, to determine the size of the credit line available.
In addition, embodiments of the present invention provide, for example, a computer-implemented method of accessing a line of credit with a prepaid card. The computer-implemented method includes a lending institution prequalifying a consumer for a line of credit for a prepaid card responsive to consumer underwriting data and predetermined qualification parameters to thereby convert consumer underwriting data into line of credit data. The computer-implemented method further includes making available draws to the line of credit line in an authorization stream for a proposed purchase using the prepaid card as payment. The line of credit has a total loan value, a preselected loan increment, a preselected loan advance fee associated with each preselected loan increment, and a line of credit balance available. The computer-implemented method also includes loading the prepaid card with an additional value equal to one or more preselected loan increments so that the prepaid card then has a new amount totaling a previous amount of value on the prepaid card plus the amount of value of the one or more preselected loan increments and so that the new amount exceeds or, alternatively, equals the value of a proposed purchase. The computer-implemented method further includes determining a new value for the line of credit balance available. The new value is a previous value for the line of credit balance available minus the value loaded onto the prepaid card and minus fees, as each of the one or more preselected loan increments loaded onto the prepaid card generates a preselected loan advance fee.
By prequalifying the consumer for the line of credit responsive to consumer underwriting data and predetermined qualification parameters and making draws to the line of credit available in the authorization stream for a purchase using the prepaid card as payment, embodiments of the present invention advantageously allow a consumer to avoid the planning and hassle associated with determining the amount of a loan prior to proposing a purchase. Previously, a consumer would have to determine the amount of the loan necessary to fund the proposed purchase, then secure the loan, and only then propose the purchase at a merchant using the prepaid card. If the information necessary to determine the amount of the loan exists only at the merchant, multiple trips to the merchant may be required. Under the embodiments of the present invention, however, multiple trips are not required as the amount of the loan is determined, up to the total loan value, in the authorization stream for a proposed purchase using the prepaid card as payment, resulting in fewer rejections of proposed purchases, less embarrassment for consumers, and reduced cost due to fewer abandoned sales as understood by those skilled in the art. Advantageously, under the embodiments of the present invention, the consumer only pays for what is actually drawn.
By loading the prepaid card in preselected loan increments, embodiments of the present invention advantageously can guarantee a fee structure that is proportional to the amount of credit accessed. By comparison, an overdraft fee charge by a bank for “bounced” check is often larger than the overdraft amount. Instead, the fee structure according to embodiments of the present invention more closely resembles an automated teller machine (ATM) fee from a consumer's point of view as understood by those skilled in the art. In addition, the use of preselected loan increments can often result in value remaining on the prepaid card, allowing for small transactions without generating additional loan fees. For example, after of a load of a preselected loan increment of $50 and subsequent purchase transaction, the balance on the prepaid card ranges from $0.00 to $49.99.
Embodiments of the present invention provide, for example, a system of advancing one or more preselected loan increments to a prepaid card. The system includes a lending institution computer positioned to manage a line of credit associated with a prepaid card, i.e., to control access to funds from a line of credit associated with a prepaid card; a plurality of merchant computers positioned to determine an amount of value of a proposed purchase of one or more items; a plurality of point-of-sale terminals, each in communication with a merchant computer; and a third computer associated with a customer prepaid card account defining a prepaid card processor. The prepaid card processor is in communication with the lending institution computer and the plurality of acquiring processors of the point-of-sale terminal through an electronic communications network. The prepaid card processor is positioned to process an authorization request for a proposed purchase of one or more items from an acquiring processor of the point-of-sale terminal. The system further includes a computer program product associated with the lending institution computer as discussed herein.
Embodiments of the present invention provide, for example, a computer program product associated with the lending institution computer, stored on a tangible computer memory media, and operable on a computer, the computer program product comprising a set of instructions that, when executed by the computer, cause the computer to perform various operations. The operations include prequalifying a consumer for a line of credit for a prepaid card by the lending institution responsive to consumer underwriting data and predetermined qualification parameters to thereby convert consumer underwriting data into line of credit data. The operations further include making available draws to the line of credit line in an authorization stream for a proposed purchase of one or more items using the prepaid card as payment. The proposed purchase data can be, for example, received by the lending institution computer through the electronic communications network from a card reader device associated with a point of sale terminal. The operations further include loading the prepaid card with an additional value equal to one or more preselected loan increments so that the prepaid card then has a new amount totaling a previous amount of value on the prepaid card plus the amount of value of the one or more preselected loan increments and so that the new amount exceeds or, alternatively, equals the value of a proposed purchase to thereby convert line of credit data into a value associated with the prepaid card to thereby fund the proposed purchase. The operations also include determining a new value for the line of credit balance available, in which the new value is a previous value for the line of credit balance available minus a value equal to the one or more preselected loan increments loaded onto the prepaid card and minus a value equal to one or more preselected loan advance fees associated with each of the one or more preselected loan increments loaded onto the prepaid card.
Additional embodiments of the present invention include a computer program product stored on a tangible computer memory media, operable on a computer, and associated with a prepaid card processor.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the financial institution can be a federally-chartered bank subject to federal banking laws and regulations and not subject to state banking laws and regulations. Also, the line of credit program can be bank product so that the line of credit program complies with federal Regulation Z.
In addition, embodiments of the present invention include systems, program products, and associated methods of advancing one or more preselected loan increments to a prepaid card and accessing a line of credit with a prepaid card as will be understood by those skilled in the art.
So that the manner in which the features and benefits of the invention, as well as others which will become apparent, may be understood in more detail, a more particular description of the invention briefly summarized above may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings, which form a part of this specification. It is also to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only various embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope as it may include other effective embodiments as well.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate embodiments of the invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As illustrated in
According to other embodiments of the present invention, the consumer initiating engagement of approval can include, for example, the consumer opting in to a program with the lending institution using a written correspondence from the consumer, a consumer selection on a website, a telephone conversation with an interactive voice response unit (IVRU), a telephone conversation with a customer service representative, a mobile phone, or a combination thereof as understood by those skilled in the art. That is, embodiments of the present invention provide numerous flexible and convenient ways to initiate consumer engagement of predetermined prepaid card approval. When launched as an accessible website, for example, the website can provide various software based program product segments, as will be understood by those skilled in the art, from which bank products are accessible or downloadable. The website preferably includes secure site pages or portions, as understood by those skilled in the art, as financial and personal data on or for customers may be provided by a customer. As described herein, the website in an exemplary embodiment includes prepaid card management capabilities as understood by those skilled in the art to enhance qualification of customers and tracking of customer usage data or history. By including this feature, embodiments of other program products, methods, and systems can be enhanced and provided.
In an embodiment of the present invention involving prequalifying a consumer for a line of credit from a bank or other lending institution, the lending institution can require or define, for example, the following initial qualification parameters for a customer: (1) customer should be a prepaid card customer; (2) customer should provide employment and wage verification through a direct deposit history; (3) customer should authorize bank initiated withdrawals from their prepaid card; and (4) customer should have a history of at least one electronic deposit. In addition, the following on-going criteria, for example, should be met: (1) customer's card account should be in good standing, not overdrawn, cancelled, or in default of the customer agreement; and (2) customer should continue to initiate electronic deposits to the card. The bank or lending institution, for example, can elect to make the account ineligible for a line of credit if an electronic deposit ceases. The bank can have a dedicated program manager qualify, approve, or authorize a customer or can use program product stored in memory to make sure the criteria or parameters are satisfied or meet certain thresholds as selected by the bank or lending institution.
For example, as illustrated in
As understood by those skilled in the art, a loan, micro-loan, repayment, line of credit, or other type of payment processor, such as provided by First Data Corporation, Total Systems Services, Inc., Fidelity National Information, Inc., or as custom developed by a bank, a financial institution, or other organization, operates to provide a customer interface on a line of credit or micro-loan request (see, e.g., access interface 700 of
The customer transaction using a prepaid card, for example, can then cause the request for the loan advance through the line of credit processor 30 or other payment processor. The credit processor 30 then posts notification of the micro-loan request through an application program interface (API) to post the loan advance in real time through an API Router 32 as understood by those skilled in the art. The API Router 32 passes the request through a security firewall 35 which passes the request through the API to a card processor 42 and particular processor API 44, such as, Metavante. The request data can be compared to flat files 46, 60, 70, e.g., data files that have no structural relationship as understood by those skilled in the art, or flat files database so that the bank or institution reconciles the loan transaction with the customer's line of credit or other account 62. Some card processors, for example, provide additional processor interfaces or allow development of additional processor interfaces, as understood by those skilled in the art, (see, e.g., API to Program Manager 52). Program manager operations, for example, can be provided by various financial solution/program management companies, such as AccountNow of San Ramon, Calif., as understood by those skilled in the art. A program manager 54, a card processor API 56, and a card processor 58 can be used by the credit processor or other payment processor for a customer transaction as understood by those skilled in the art.
The following example illustrates an embodiment of the present invention. See also
In other embodiments of the present invention, the lending institution can make available only a part of the preauthorized total loan value available for loading onto the prepaid card, responsive to a consumer determination, so that the consumer retains maximum control. For example, the consumer determines to make available only $75 of the preauthorized total loan value, of say $200. The amount of value of the proposed purchase is determined to be $98; the amount of value on the prepaid card is determined to be $20; and the difference is determined to be $78. Because the difference is greater than the amount available for loading onto the prepaid card, authorization for the proposed purchase is denied, and the proposed purchase is rejected.
As understood by those skilled in the art, by loading the prepaid card only in preselected loan increments, embodiments of the present invention advantageously can guarantee a fee structure that is proportional to the amount of credit accessed. By comparison, an overdraft fee charge by a bank for “bounced” check is often by larger than the overdraft amount. Instead, the fee structure according to embodiments of the present invention more closely resembles an automated teller machine (ATM) fee. In addition, the use of preselected loan increments can often result in value remaining on the prepaid card, allowing for small transactions without generating additional loan fees. For example, after of a load of a preselected loan increment of $50 and subsequent purchase transaction, the balance on the prepaid card ranges from $0.00 to $49.99.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the financial institution can be a federally-chartered bank subject to federal banking laws and regulations and not subject to state banking laws and regulations. Therefore, the federally-chartered financial institution enjoys rate preemption; that is, state licensing requirements, as well as regulations in many states that limit lending interest rates, are preempted and do not apply to the federally-chartered financial institution. As understood by those skilled in the art, a federally-chartered financial institution can operate in every state with a consistent implementation nationally rather than a state-by-state approach, can provide consumers with Regulation Z protection, and can charge any loan or interest rate for the gap filling loans or immediate financing loans without regard to state law.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the lending institution can adjust the preauthorized total loan value and repayment terms based on the performance of the consumer. That is, a consumer with good repayment history can typically earn access to a larger line of credit.
As illustrated in
As understood by those skilled in the art, by prequalifying the consumer for the line of credit and making draws to the line of credit available in the authorization stream for a purchase using the prepaid card as payment, embodiments of the present invention advantageously allow a consumer to avoid the planning and hassle associated with determining the amount of a loan prior to proposing a purchase. Previously, a consumer would have to determine the amount of the loan necessary to fund the proposed purchase, then secure the loan, and only then propose the purchase at a merchant using the prepaid card. If the information necessary to determine the amount of the loan exists only at the merchant, multiple trips to the merchant may be required. Under the embodiments of the present invention, however, multiple trips are not required as the amount of the loan is determined, up to the total loan value, in the authorization stream for a proposed purchase using the prepaid card as payment, resulting in fewer rejections of proposed purchases, less embarrassment for consumers, and reduced cost due to fewer abandoned sales as understood by those skilled in the art. Advantageously, under the embodiments of the present invention, the consumer only pays for what is actually drawn.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
According to embodiments of the present invention, the prepaid card processor can communicate with the lending institution computer in real-time, near real-time, in a batch process, daily, or periodically, as understood by those skilled in the art, to assess if a line of credit is available and if a draw is available, or to update line of credit balances.
Other embodiments of the present invention, for example, can include a stand-in account at the prepaid card processor associated with the line-of-credit or the lending institution to facilitate loading the prepaid card as will be understood by those skilled in the art. A stand-in account allows a consumer to have transactions approved even when the primary authorization system is technically unavailable. This is achieved by one processor using data and instructions provided to it by the authorizing processor to “stand in” and approve or decline transactions on the authorizing processor's behalf if the authorizing processor system is unavailable for real-time processing.
In other embodiments of the present invention, rather than loading the prepaid card in preselected loan increments with each increment associated with a preselected loan advance fee, the prepaid card can be loaded through a draw for an exact amount of purchase at a defined rate. In such embodiment, a standard consumer draw on the line of credit could be in $20 increments, but when an auto-draw is initiated by a purchase at a point of sale or an automated teller machine (ATM) withdrawal, the exact amount of funds needed to be borrowed will be advanced. As a result, for example, the fee amount assessed for a $20 draw might be $2.50, while if the amount borrowed on an auto-draw is only $10 the fee would be assessed ratably and would be $1.25 for the borrowing.
Embodiments of the present invention can, for example, include repayment of at least portions of the line of credit responsive to a subsequent direct deposit received for customer's benefit by the bank so that the repayment of the at least portions of the line of credit is deducted from the subsequent direct deposit. That is, loans made under a line of credit can be repaid out of the proceeds of a direct deposit. Recurring direct deposits include, for example, employer payroll funds, federal or state government electronic benefits payments, annuities, dividends, interest payments, lottery winnings, royalty payments, and other streams of payments as understood by one skilled in the art.
Embodiments of systems, program products, and methods of the present invention can include, for example, for substantially all programs if desired, features such as any repayment of draws on the line of credit can be automatically collected from the next electronic deposit regardless of payment source. As payments are received, fees also can be paid first then the payment applied to the oldest outstanding draw amount. When payments are received, total available line limit is restored by the payment amount. If funds from the electronic deposit are not sufficient to cover the outstanding balance, a partial repayment can be made in the full amount of the electronic deposit resulting in an unpaid balance on the line. Repayment of the remaining unpaid balance can be taken from subsequent electronic deposits until the line has been paid in full. Other cash equivalent repayment options also can be accepted and processed by a line of credit processor as understood by those skilled in the art.
It will also be understood by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the line of credit product or program product, for example, can be associated with a payroll processing company that processes direct deposits (see, e.g.,
Additionally, along these lines, any repayment of a line supersedes repayment of a negative balance on a card due to force posts or settlement transactions that cause the card to go negative. Any monies remaining after a payment is received can be credited to the prepaid card account. If payment takes the card balance to $0, any transactions attempted with the card can be declined. Those transactions can be subject to any related decline fees. Repayment of a draw, for example, should not be taken from the principal balance on a card. That is, if a card balance is positive prior to a draw, only when the next electronic deposit is initiated to the card will repayment be triggered. If a draw is not paid within the preselected time period, preferably days, e.g., 35 day timeframe, any amount owed can be taken from the principal balance on a card.
Embodiments of the present invention provide, for example, a program product 900 associated with a bank or other financial or lending institution implemented in modules or components, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
A person having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that various types of memory are readable by a computer such as described herein, e.g., lending institution, prepaid processor, or other computers with embodiments of the present invention. Examples of computer readable media include but are not limited to: nonvolatile, hard-coded type media such as read only memories (ROMs), CD-ROMs, and DVD-ROMs, or erasable, electrically programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), recordable type media such as floppy disks, hard disk drives, CD-R/RWs, DVD-RAMs, DVD-R/RWs, DVD+R/RWs, flash drives, memory sticks, and other newer types of memories, and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links. For example, such media can include operating instructions, as well as instructions related to the system and the method steps described above and can operate on a computer. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that such media can be at other locations instead of or in addition to the lending institution computer to store program products, e.g., including software, thereon.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the invention will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the illustrated embodiments disclosed, and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority and the benefit to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,211, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card” filed on Apr. 2, 2009, which claims benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/042,612, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card” filed on Apr. 4, 2008, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application also relates to: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/016,213, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Methods” filed on Dec. 21, 2007; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/052,454, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Methods to Prioritize Payments from Preselected Bank Account” filed May 12, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/029,975, by Sorbe et al., titled “Methods To Advance Loan Proceeds On Prepaid Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products” filed on Feb. 20, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/042,624, by Crowe et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method to Authorize Draw for Retailer Optimization” filed on Apr. 4, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/032,750, by Ahlers et al., titled “Methods, Program Product, and System for Micro-Loan Management” filed on Feb. 29, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/060,559, by Galit et al., titled “Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time” filed on Jun. 11, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/082,863, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method For Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw” filed on Jul. 23, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/053,056, by Galit et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method For Loading a Loan On a Pre-Paid Card” filed on May 14, 2008, all of which are each incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. This application also relates to: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,365, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,402, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,440, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,584, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Computer-Implemented Methods to Prioritize Payments from Preselected Bank Account” filed Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,645, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Computer-Implemented Methods to Prioritize Payments from Preselected Bank Account” filed Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/389,749, by Sorbe et al., titled “Methods to Advance Loan Proceeds on Prepaid Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products” filed on Feb. 20, 2009; PCT/US09/34692, by Sorbe et al., titled “Methods to Advance Loan Proceeds on Prepaid. Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products” filed on Feb. 20, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,211, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card” filed on Apr. 2, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,182, by Crowe et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method to Authorize Draw for Retailer Optimization” filed on the Apr. 2, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,684, by Ahlers et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System for Micro-Loan Management” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; PCT/US08/87660 by Ahlers et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System for Micro-Loan Management” filed on Dec. 19, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,712, by Galit et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; PCT/US08/87689 by Galit et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time” filed on Dec. 19, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,162, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method For Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw” filed on the same day herewith, all of which are each incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority and the benefit to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,211, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card” filed on Apr. 2, 2009, which claims benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/042,612, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card” filed on Apr. 4, 2008, each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application also relates to: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/016,213, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Methods” filed on Dec. 21, 2007; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/052,454, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Methods to Prioritize Payments from Preselected Bank Account” filed May 12, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/029,975, by Sorbe et al., titled “Methods To Advance Loan Proceeds On Prepaid Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products” filed on Feb. 20, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/042,624, by Crowe et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method to Authorize Draw for Retailer Optimization” filed on Apr. 4, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/032,750, by Ahlers et al., titled “Methods, Program Product, and System for Micro-Loan Management” filed on Feb. 29, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/060,559, by Galit et al., titled “Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time” filed on Jun. 11, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/082,863, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method For Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw” filed on Jul. 23, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/053,056, by Galit et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method For Loading a Loan On a Pre-Paid Card” filed on May 14, 2008, all of which are each incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. This application also relates to: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,365, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,402, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,440, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,584, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Computer-Implemented Methods to Prioritize Payments from Preselected Bank Account” filed Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,645, by Sorbe et al., titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Computer-Implemented Methods to Prioritize Payments from Preselected Bank Account” filed Dec. 18, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/389,749, by Sorbe et al., titled “Methods to Advance Loan Proceeds on Prepaid Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products” filed on Feb. 20, 2009; PCT/US09/34692, by Sorbe et al., titled “Methods to Advance Loan Proceeds on Prepaid Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products” filed on Feb. 20, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,211, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card” filed on Apr. 2, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,182, by Crowe et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method to Authorize Draw for Retailer Optimization” filed on the Apr. 2, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,684, by Ahlers et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System for Micro-Loan Management” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; PCT/US08/87660 by Ahlers et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System for Micro-Loan Management” filed on Dec. 19, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/338,712, by Galit et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time” filed on Dec. 18, 2008; PCT/US08/87689 by Galit et al., titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time” filed on Dec. 19, 2008; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/417,162, by Ahlers et al., titled “System, Program Product, and Method For Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw” filed on the same day herewith, all of which are each incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3752904 | Waterbury | Aug 1973 | A |
4247759 | Yuris et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4334307 | Bourgeois et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4439636 | Newkirk et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4449040 | Matsuoka et al. | May 1984 | A |
4528643 | Freeny, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4532416 | Berstein | Jul 1985 | A |
4577061 | Katzeff et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4625276 | Benton et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4677565 | Ogaki et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4678895 | Tateisi et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4706275 | Kamil | Nov 1987 | A |
4722054 | Yorozu et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727243 | Savar | Feb 1988 | A |
4750201 | Hodgson et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4797540 | Kimizu | Jan 1989 | A |
4827113 | Rikuna | May 1989 | A |
4868900 | McGuire | Sep 1989 | A |
4877947 | Mori | Oct 1989 | A |
4879744 | Tasaki et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884212 | Stutsman | Nov 1989 | A |
4951308 | Bishop et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4968873 | Dethloff et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5012077 | Takano | Apr 1991 | A |
5048085 | Abraham et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5050207 | Hitchcock | Sep 1991 | A |
5068891 | Marshall | Nov 1991 | A |
5101098 | Naito | Mar 1992 | A |
5138650 | Stahl et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146067 | Sloan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5148481 | Abraham et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155342 | Urano | Oct 1992 | A |
5163086 | Ahearn et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5192947 | Neustein | Mar 1993 | A |
5220593 | Zicker et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221838 | Gutman et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5225666 | Amarena et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5264689 | Maes et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265155 | Castro | Nov 1993 | A |
5266782 | Alanara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5272320 | Hakamada | Dec 1993 | A |
5278752 | Narita et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285382 | Muehlberger et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5327482 | Yamamoto | Jul 1994 | A |
5334821 | Campo et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340969 | Cox | Aug 1994 | A |
5352876 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359182 | Schilling | Oct 1994 | A |
5409092 | Itako et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416306 | Imahata | May 1995 | A |
5438186 | Nair et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442567 | Small | Aug 1995 | A |
5448044 | Price et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5465206 | Hilt et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477038 | Levine et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5504808 | Hamrick, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511114 | Stimson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513117 | Small | Apr 1996 | A |
5550358 | Tait et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5577109 | Stimson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577121 | Davis et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5661254 | Steuer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5696908 | Muehlberger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699528 | Hogan | Dec 1997 | A |
5732136 | Murphree et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5814798 | Zancho | Sep 1998 | A |
5841365 | Rimkus | Nov 1998 | A |
5859419 | Wynn | Jan 1999 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5875437 | Atkins | Feb 1999 | A |
5878141 | Daly et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893907 | Ukuda | Apr 1999 | A |
5897620 | Walker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920848 | Schutzer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923016 | Fredregill et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933812 | Meyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963921 | Longfield | Oct 1999 | A |
6000608 | Dorf | Dec 1999 | A |
6012635 | Shimada et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021397 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032859 | Muehlberger et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041308 | Walker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065679 | Levie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6112191 | Burke | Aug 2000 | A |
6144948 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6189787 | Dorf | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208978 | Walker et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6249773 | Allard et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253998 | Ziarno | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6304860 | Martin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315193 | Hogan | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6450407 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467684 | Fite et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6704714 | O'Leary et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6739506 | Constantine | May 2004 | B1 |
6865544 | Austin | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6920434 | Cossette | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6999943 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010507 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031939 | Gallagher et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7072862 | Wilson | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7127452 | Yashiro | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7177829 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7206761 | Colvin | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7252223 | Schofield | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258273 | Griffin | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7370076 | Friedman et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398919 | Cooper | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426492 | Bishop et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7451920 | Rose | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7472089 | Hu et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7493279 | Kwan | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7509286 | Bent et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7546945 | Bucci et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7567936 | Peckover et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7599879 | Louie et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606918 | Holzman et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607570 | Constantine | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7628319 | Brown et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653591 | Dabney | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7702583 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7702587 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7757944 | Cline et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7783571 | Fish et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792717 | Hankins et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7810735 | Madani | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813955 | Ariff et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814012 | Johnson | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7865434 | Sheets | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873569 | Cahn | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7899750 | Klieman et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7904333 | Perkowski | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7933833 | Hotz et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7954704 | Gephart et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8024242 | Galit | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8046256 | Chien et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051006 | Rourk | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8055557 | Sorbe et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065187 | Ahlers et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069085 | Ahlers et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8086494 | Dooley et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090649 | Galit et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103549 | Ahlers et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8108272 | Sorbe et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108279 | Galit et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108977 | Miller | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8150764 | Crowe et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8214286 | Galit et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8244611 | Galit | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8244637 | Galit et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20010021925 | Ukigawa et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034663 | Teveler et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034676 | Vasic | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010042785 | Walker et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002075 | Rowe | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032612 | Williams et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038285 | Golden et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042744 | Kohl | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055904 | Mon | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055909 | Fung et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077971 | Allred | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107797 | Combaluzier | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152161 | Aoike | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194122 | Knox et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194124 | Hobbs et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004997 | Parker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055782 | Slater | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061170 | Uzo | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074311 | Saylors et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097331 | Cohen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135459 | Abelman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144935 | Sobek | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158811 | Sanders et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167225 | Adams | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191702 | Hurley | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191714 | Norris | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197059 | Tidball et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200118 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208443 | Mersky | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217003 | Weinflash et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040036215 | Butler | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047459 | Diaz | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098351 | Duke | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111370 | Saylors et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117250 | Lubow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117302 | Weichert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133515 | McCoy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143527 | Benkert et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148252 | Fleishman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153407 | Clubb et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199463 | Deggendorf | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210484 | Lee | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211830 | Algiene | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215554 | Kemper et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225545 | Turner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230523 | Johnson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040235542 | Stronach et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236646 | Wu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004839 | Bakker et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015332 | Chen | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021363 | Stimson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075939 | Bao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082364 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108121 | Gravett et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050167481 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050167487 | Conlon et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050173520 | Jaros et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177489 | Neff et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203837 | Leigh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205663 | Algiene | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228724 | Frangiosa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050278188 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278347 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283436 | Greer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289044 | Breslin et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060059085 | Tucker | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085269 | Guilfoyle | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085334 | Murphy | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149665 | Weksler | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149670 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161499 | Rich et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169784 | Collins et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190322 | Oehlerking et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206402 | Sullivan | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212392 | Brown | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212393 | Brown | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224502 | McGowan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249570 | Seifert | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259957 | Tam et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282356 | Andres et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282374 | Stone | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293966 | Inouye | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000997 | Lambert et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011089 | DeSchryver | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038515 | Postrel | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038924 | Beyer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070045401 | Sturm | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061206 | LeFebvre | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083462 | Cubillo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070087819 | Van Luchene et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090183 | Hursta et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100745 | Keiser et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100746 | Blair et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106603 | Whyte et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136194 | Sloan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152038 | Ciancio et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168265 | Rosenberger | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174189 | Bishop et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175982 | Bonalle et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070175984 | Khandaker et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198352 | Kannegiesser | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198354 | Senghore et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198403 | Aloni et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233596 | Ambrose | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244778 | Bailard | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250380 | Mankoff | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260536 | Stone | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262140 | Long | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265957 | Advani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265960 | Advani et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070267479 | Nix et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271178 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276736 | Guilfoyle | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282740 | Wendt | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005001 | Davis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021772 | Aloni et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040261 | Nix et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040265 | Rackley et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052224 | Parker | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059363 | Hotz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065532 | De La Motte | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091519 | Foss | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103968 | Bies et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103970 | Books et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120129 | Seubert et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140561 | Neel | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140568 | Henry | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162271 | Benjamin | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162337 | Greenland et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080210753 | Plozay et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228643 | Hall | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235095 | Oles et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080270298 | McElroy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281734 | Longe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294977 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301162 | Wall et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090048963 | Bishop et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061929 | Evans | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063297 | Dooley et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063342 | Beckers | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063351 | Schmeyer et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090157220 | Walker et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164351 | Sorbe et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164362 | Moore | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164363 | Ahlers et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171775 | Cashion et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192934 | Chu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222367 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228307 | Sorbe | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254431 | Crowe et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100030687 | Panthaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057554 | Lanford | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057609 | Sibson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076836 | Giordano et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076875 | Ernst et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100106555 | Mneimneh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100222132 | Sanford et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100280949 | Van Rensburg | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306104 | Johnson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312684 | Kemper et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047039 | Crames et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110093323 | Prus et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106698 | Isaacson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112957 | Ingram et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110270664 | Jones | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0397512 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0619565 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0348932 | May 1995 | EP |
2-238593 | Sep 1990 | JP |
2-278495 | Nov 1990 | JP |
3-100791 | Apr 1991 | JP |
4-165588 | Jun 1992 | JP |
2010010217 | Feb 2010 | KR |
8602757 | May 1986 | WO |
8607647 | Dec 1986 | WO |
8803297 | May 1988 | WO |
8908899 | Sep 1989 | WO |
9109370 | Jun 1991 | WO |
9309515 | May 1993 | WO |
9410649 | May 1994 | WO |
9428498 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9503570 | Feb 1995 | WO |
9746986 | Dec 1997 | WO |
0060487 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2007133315 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008102329 | Aug 2008 | WO |
200709282 | Oct 2007 | ZA |
Entry |
---|
Daniel Wolfe. (Jul. 28, 2005). An E-Variation on Payday Loan Theme. American Banker, p. 1. Retrieved Aug. 9, 2011, from Accounting & Tax Periodicals. |
David Lazarus (Oct. 6, 2004). 120% rate for Well's advance. San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco, California, p. C1. |
Congressional Budget Office, “Emerging Electronic Method for Making Payments” (Jun. 1996) CBO. |
Coady et al., “Targeted anti-povety intervention: A selected annotated bibliography” (Apr. 2002), World Bank. |
Notice of Allowance from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,896, dated Jan. 3, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,268, dated Dec. 13, 2011. |
Office Action from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/367,187 dated Jan. 6, 2012. |
Office Action from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,852, dated Dec. 22, 2011. |
Business Dateline, Q Comm Expands Calling Card Products with Best Telecom Point-of-Sale Activated Cards; All Q Comm VeriFone Merchants Can Now Deliver Durable Calling Cards (Dec. 6, 2010), Business Wire (Dec. 18, 2011). |
Notice of Allowance from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,803 dated Dec. 20, 2011. |
MasterCard Electronic prepaid (Oct. 2003). The Nilson Report, (798), (Dec. 9, 2011), The Banking Source (Document ID 474833171). |
Downes, How to avoid exchange charges Wasting Money a foreign currency bank account could be the answer, The Daily Telegraph, London (UK), Mar. 10, 2007. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,405 dated Feb. 2, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,524 dated Feb. 14, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,182 dated Feb. 14, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,497 dated Mar. 1, 2012. |
Final Office Action co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,277 dated Feb. 28, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/607,780 dated Mar. 19, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,803 dated Mar. 20, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/562,331 dated Mar. 20, 2012. |
Ex-parte Quayle Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/700,681 dated Mar. 23, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/389,749 dated Mar. 29, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,852 dated Apr. 5, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,306 dated Apr. 11, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,423 dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,490 dated Apr. 18, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,847 dated Apr. 30, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,440 dated Jan. 19, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,306 date Nov. 10, 2011. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,540 dated Mar. 15, 2012. |
Wolf, File History of US 2005/0278347. |
Check Cashers Move Into Cards, Accounts (Cover Story), ATM & Debit News [serial online], Apr. 20, 2006, 6(24), pp. 1-3, available from Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. |
Mangu-Ward, K.; (Oct. 2009), Payday of Reckoning, Reason, 41(5), pp. 40-47, retrieved Jun. 15, 2012, from Research Library (Document ID:1861658171). |
Wolf, Alan Steven, What to do when the Chain Breaks, Servicing Management, Feb. 1997, 3 pages. |
99Bill Launches Installment Credit Services, (Aug. 21, 2008), PR Newswire, 2 pages, retrieved Jul. 9, 2012, from Business Dateline (Document ID: 1536854041). |
Intralinks, Inc. Begins European Rollout of Its Proven Electronic Solution for Loan Syndication, London (Business Wire), Oct. 8, 1997, 3 pages. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,405 dated May 22, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/405,051 dated Jun. 6, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,524 dated Jun. 8, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/700,681 dated Jun. 11, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/365,982 dated Jun. 26, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/554,432 dated Jun. 29, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,290 dated Jul. 3, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,540 dated Jul. 9, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,186 dated Jul. 13, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/330,397 dated Jul. 18, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/367,187 dated Jul. 19, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,700 dated Jul. 19, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/626,349 dated Jul. 20, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/036,076 dated Jul. 24, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/481,950 dated Jul. 30, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/405,079 dated Aug. 6, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/474,519 dated Aug. 27, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,281 dated Aug. 30, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,405 dated Sep. 4, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,497 dated Sep. 17, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,490 dated Sep. 20, 2012. |
Jane Boon Pearlstine, “Lenders, Borrowers Hook Up Over the Web: Prosper.com and Other Sites Provide Forum for Individual Bidders Willing to Offer Small Loans”, Wall Street Journal, May 20, 2006. |
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “E-Finance and Small and Medium-Size Enterprises (SMEs) in Developing and Transition Economies”, UNCTAD Expert Meeting, Oct. 17, 2001. |
Tim Jones, “Paradigms Lost”, RSA Journal, Oct. 2006,pp. 28-31. |
Diego Rumiany, “Internet Bidding for Microcredit: Making it Work in the Developed World, Conceiving it for the Developing World”, Mar. 2007. |
Stefan Heng, Thomas Meyer,and Antje Stobbe, “Implications of Web 2.0 for Financial Institutions: Be a Driver, Not a Passenger”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Jul. 31, 2007. |
Matt Flannery, “Kiva and the Birth of Person to Person Microfinance”, Innovations, pp. 31-58, Winter & Spring 2007. |
Michael K. Hulme and Collette Wright, “Internet Based Social Lending: Past, Present and Future”, Social Futures Observatory, Oct. 2006. |
Richard. W. Coleman, “Is the Future of the Microfinance Movement to be Found on the Internet?”, International Trade and Finance Association Working Papers, 2007. |
Amanda Scott and Patrick Towell, “The Web We Weave”, Financial World, pp. 12-15, Nov. 2006. |
Prosper, “Access and Transparency through Person-to-Person Lending,” FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic Inclusion, Mar. 28, 2007. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,402, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,440, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,712, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Program Product, and System to Enhance Banking Terms Over Time”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,684, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,497, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Private Label Promotion Card System, Program Product, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,540, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Private Label Promotion Card System, Program Product, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,584, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Methods to Prioritize Payments From Preselected Bank Accounts”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,645, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Methods to Prioritize Payments From Preselected Bank Accounts”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/554,659, filed Sep. 4, 2009, titled “System,Method, and Program Product for Foreign Currency Travel Account”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/554,432, filed Sep. 4, 2009, titled “System, Program Product and Methods for Retail Activation and Reload Associated With Partial Authorization Transactions”. |
Cross, Sam Y., All About . . . The Foreign Exchange Market in the United States, 1998, Federal Reserve Bank of new York. |
Wolfe, Daniel, “An E-Variation on Payday Loan Theme”, American Banker, Jul. 28, 2005. |
Financial Advice Investment Money Oct. 1, 2009 at 5:50pm. HSBC Offshore Internet Banking (Notice of Allowance in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/554,659 by Examiner). |
Financial Advice Investment Money Oct. 1, 2009 at 7:52 am. HSBC Offshore Internet Banking (Notice of Allowance in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/554,659 by Examiner). |
Orszag, Peter, “Unemployment Insurance as an Economic Stimulus”, Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, Nov. 15, 2011. |
Powell, Robert L., “Statewide Electronic Commerce Program Status Report”, State of North Carolina Office of the State Controller, Mar. 7, 2007. |
Parrott, James, “Jittery Wall Street, Calm City?”, Gotham Gazette, Apr. 16, 2007. |
Zandi, Mark, “Washington Throws the Economy a Rope”, Moody's Economy.com, Jan. 22, 2008. |
Blair, Christine E., et al., “Challenges to the Dual Banking System: The Funding of Bank Supervision”, FDIC Bank Review, Mar. 31, 2006. |
“Developing Asia and the World”, Asian Development Bank 2002. |
Microtrax Ltd., PC Electronic Payment Systems Reference Manual; 1995 (381 pages). |
Caskey, John P. et al., “Is the Debit Card Revolution Finally Here”, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review: Fourth Quarter 1994; pp. 70-95, vol. 79, #4 (17 pages). |
Castaneda, Laura, “Business Promote Services to Customers Day In and Day Out”, The Dallas Morning News, Nov. 26, 1994 (3 pages). |
Mannix, Margaret, “Checkout Tech”, U.S. News and World Report, Feb. 27, 1995, (6 pages). |
“Credit Terminals to be Used at Canadian Liquor Outlets”, Card News, Jan. 23,1995, (1 page). |
“Debit Card Popularity on the Rise,” Chain Store Age Executive, Jan. 1994, (1 page). |
“Debit Goes to Dinner”, Credit Card Management, New York, Oct. 1994 (2 pages). |
Peppard, Alan, “Down and Dirty in Deep Ellum,” The Dallas Morning News, Dec. 3, 1994 (2 pages). |
Everest Reference Manual, VeriFone Part No. 25399, Revision A, Manual Revision 1.0, Jul. 1995, (66 pages). |
“Express Cards and Trains”, Chain Store Age Executive Edition, Jan. 1995, (1 page). |
Brown, Suzanne, “Goodnight Amy, Meg, Beth and Jo”, Rocky Mountain News, Dec. 8, 1994 (1 page). |
Klein, Robert J., “Here Comes the Debit Card”, D& B Reports, Jul./Aug. 1990 (2 pages). |
Hypercom S7C Advertisement, Chain Store Age, Sep. 1995 (4 pages). |
Hypersom S7SC Advertisement, Chain Store Age, Feb. 1996 (2 pages). |
IBM 4680-4690 Advanced Payment System for Chain Drug Sales Application User's Guide, Nov. 1996 (256 pages). |
IBM 4680-4690 Advanced Payment System for Chain Drug Sales Application User's Guide, Jul. 1996 (248 pages). |
IBM 4680-4690 Advanced Payment Systems for Supermarket Application User's Guide, Sep. 1996 (222 pages). |
Fox, Linda A., “Keep an Eye on Your Credit Card,” The Toronto Sun, Aug. 9,1996 (1 page). |
Pyatt, Rudolph A., Jr., “Mobil Stations to Permit Use of Bank Cards”, The Washington Post (1 page). |
NCR 4430-5000 MSR/PIN User's Guide, 1994 (265 pages). |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,211, filed Apr. 2, 2009, titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to Prepaid Card”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,182, filed Apr. 2, 2009, titled “System, Program Product, and Method to Authorize Draw for Retailer Optimization”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,320, filed Mar. 19, 2009, titled “Computerized Extension of Credit to Existing Demand Deposit Accounts, Prepaid Cards and Lines of Credit Based on Expected Tax Refund Proceeds, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,162, filed Apr. 2, 2009, titled System, Program Product, and Method for Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/367,187, filed Feb. 6, 2009, titled “Government Targeted-Spending Stimulus Card System, Program Product and Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,277, filed May 13, 2009, titled “System, Program Product, and Computer- implemented Method for Loading a Loan on a Pre-Paid Card”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,306, filed May 13, 2009, titled “System, Program Product, and Computer- Implemented Methods for Loading a Loan on an Existing Pre-Paid Card”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,803, filed May 13, 2009, titled “System, Program Product, and Method for Loading a Loan on a Pre-Paid Card”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/607,780, filed Oct. 28, 2009, titled “Shopping Center Gift Card Offer Fulfillment Machine, Program Product, and Associated Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,896, filed Oct. 30, 2009, titled “Machine Methods, and Program Product for Electronic Order Entry”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/626,349, filed Nov. 25, 2009, titled “Machine, Methods, and Program Product for Electronic Inventory Tracking”. |
Co-pending U.S. 13/232,405, filed Sep. 14, 2011, titled “System, Method, and Program Product for Foreign Currency Travel Account”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/233,268, filed Sep. 15, 2011, titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to Prepaid Card”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/214,126, filed Aug. 19, 2011, titled “Person-to-Person Lending Program Product, System, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
Nieman Marcus: High-Tech for the Holidays, ADWEEK, Dec. 5, 1994 (1 page). |
Neiman Marcus Offers Electronic Gift Certificate, Card Fax, Jan. 23, 1995 (1 page). |
Neiman Marcus to Launch NM Express Automated Gift Card, PR Newswire, Nov. 22, 1994 (1 page). |
NM Express Card Advertisement, The New Yorker, Dec. 12, 1994 (3 pages). |
Service Mark Registration No. 1,981,044 for “NM Express Card”, registered Jun. 18, 1996 (1 page). |
Omni 480/490 Programmer's Guide, VeriFone Part No. 12924—Revision A, Manual Revision 1.0, Oct. 1993 (228 pages). |
“One Company's Diversification Shakes Up Peripherals Market”, Chain Store Age, Jun. 1996 (3 pages). |
O'Keefe, Michael, “Portable POS Terminal Mean Greater Convenience”, Bank Systems & Technology, Nov. 1994 (2 pages). |
“POS Terminal Can Handle Direct Debits”, ABA Banking Journal, Sep. 1984 (2 pages). |
Racel Corp, Advertisement, POS Terminal Eliminates Credit Card Vouchers, ABA Banking Journal, Nov. 1985 (2 pages). |
Szabo, Joan C., “The Changing World of Financial Services”, Nation's Business, Oct. 1994 (7 pages). |
VeriFone Everest Advertisement, Stores, May 1995 (2 pages). |
VeriFone Folio (TM) Brings Credit and Debit Card Payment to the Restaurant Table, PR Newswire, May 16, 1994 (3 pages). |
Barnes, David B., VeriFone Introduces Everest (TM) Customer Activated Payment System to Multi-Lane Retail Market, OR Newswire, Feb. 20, 1995 (2 pages). |
VeriFone Introduces Pinpad (TM) 1000 to Point-of-Sale Debit Market, M2 Presswire, Apr. 21, 1995 (1 page). |
VeriFone TCL Terminal Control Language Programmer's Manual, VeriFone Part No. 00368-01, Revision G, Manual Revision 8.0, Aug. 1992 (362 pages). |
VeriFone Tranz 330 Reference Manual, VeriFone Part No. 00483-Revision D, Manual Revision 3.01, Apr. 1990 (144 pages). |
Microtrax, Ltd. Omni 490 M (and 490ML) Operation Manual for Integrated and Non-Integrated Configurations, 1994 (60 pages). |
Microtrax Electronic Payment Systems: The MicroTrax Pinstripe Lane Equipment Users Guide, MicroTrax Ltd., Newport Beach, CA 1991 (54 pages). |
IBM 4680-4690 Supermarket Application—Electronic Funds Transfer Feature Enhancement: User's Guide, IBM Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC, Sep. 1995 (318 pages). |
IBM 4680 General Sales Application Electronic Funds Transfer User's Guide, IBM Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC, Dec. 1990 (280 pages). |
IBM 4680 General Sales Application Electronic Funds Transfer User's Guide, IBM Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC, Mar. 1991 (263 pages). |
IBM 4680 General Sales Application: Guide to Operations, Research Triangle Park, NC, Jun. 1991 (429 pages). |
Krino, Gray, et al., “A Birthday Card That Pays Off”, The Orange County Register, Jul. 19, 1996 (2 pages). |
Cohen, Bruce, “Alternative to Cash Gains Ground”, The Financial Post, Apr. 22, 1994 (2 pages). |
Bank of Boulder POS Debit Solution at the Table Now in Beta: First Bank to Certify IVI Spirit C2000 on MAPP (R), Business Wire, Aug. 3, 1994 (1 page). |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/562,331, filed Sep. 18, 2009, titled “Computerized Extension of Credit to Existing Demand Deposit Accounts, Prepaid Cards and Lines of Credit Based on Expected Tax Refund Proceeds, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/700,681, filed Feb. 4, 2010, titled System and Computer Program Product to Issue a Retail Prepaid Card including a User-Designed External Face Using a Chit and Related Computer Implemented Methods. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/814,405, filed Jun. 11, 2010, titled Environmental-Friendly Fuel Credit Card System, Program Product, and Computer-Implemented Methods. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,490, filed Sep. 8, 2010, titled “System, Program Product, and Method for Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/877,524, filed Sep. 8, 2010, titled System, Program Product, and Method for Debit Card and Checking Account Autodraw. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/889,281, filed Sep. 23, 2010, titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Computer Program Products, and Systems for Enhanced Loan Product Repayments”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/892,847, filed Sep. 28, 2010, titled “Computer-Implemented Methods, Computer Program Products, and Systems for Management and Control of a Loyalty Rewards Network”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/731,852, filed Mar. 25, 2010, titled “Machine, Program Product, and Computer Implemented Methods for Confirming a Mobile Banking Request”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/036,076, filed Feb. 28, 2011, titled “Machine, Program Product, and Computer—Implemented Method to Construct a Person-To-Person Loan”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,199, filed Apr. 2, 2009, titled “System, Program Product, and Associated Methods to Autodraw for Micro-Credit Attached to a Prepaid Card”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/389,749, filed Feb. 20, 2009, titled “Methods to Advance Loan Proceeds on Prepaid Cards, Associated Systems and Computer Program Products”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,113, filed Mar. 3, 2009, titled “Person-To-Person Lending Program Products, System, and Associated Computer—Implemented Methods”. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,365, filed Dec. 18, 2008, titled “Transfer Account Systems, Computer Program Products, and Associated Computer-Implemented Methods”. |
“Letter of Credit Explained: What is Lettter of Credit?”, Dec. 26, 2005, pp. 1-2. |
VIPGift Received Investment from Summit Partners and Bridgescale Partners, Nov. 11, 2008, Chattanooga, TN and Palo Alto, CA. |
Bank Deals-Best Rates and Deals: EverBank's World Currency CDs—My Interview with EverBank's Executive Frank Trotter, http://bankdeals.blogspot.com, Jul. 29, 2007. |
Foreign Exchange Market, http://en.wikipedia.org. |
Avoid Gift Card Pitfalls, ConsumerReports.org. |
Office action from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,497 dated Aug. 18, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,199 dated Aug. 18, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,211 dated Aug. 22, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/554,669 dated Aug. 2, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,712 dated Jul. 28, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,440 dated Aug. 1, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/367,187 dated Jun. 27, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,896 dated Apr. 5, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,162 dated Apr. 13, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,684 dated Mar. 4, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,199 dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,803 dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,584 dated Mar. 22, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,211 dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,320 dated Mar. 29, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,402 dated Feb. 18, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,402 dated Sep. 28, 2010. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,162 dated Sep. 3, 2010. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/56072 dated Oct. 20, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/39504 dated May 27, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/39512 dated Jun. 8, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/43978 dated Jun. 30, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/43988 dated Jul. 14, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/39492 dated May 14, 2009 |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/39495 dated May 18, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US08/87689 dated Jun. 17, 2009. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,365 dated Jul. 9, 2010. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,645 dated Jul. 9, 2010. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,645 dated Jul. 19, 2010. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,365 dated Jan. 26, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,162 dated Jan. 19, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/389,749 dated Feb. 1, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,540 dated Sep. 1, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/34692 dated Apr. 14, 2009. |
Final Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,584 dated Sep. 15, 2011. |
Final Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,684 dated Sep. 23, 2011. |
Lazarus, David, “120% rate for Wells' Advances”, Oct. 16, 2004, San Francisco Chronicle (Final Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,684 dated Sep. 23, 2011). |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/397,113 dated Sep. 30, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/338,645 dated Oct. 3, 2011. |
Office Action in co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,182 dated Sep. 28, 2011. |
Zubko, N., “An Automotic Connection Electronic Transaction Tools Help Manufacturers Connect With Suppliers to Streamline Sourcing Efforts”, Industry Week, Jul. 2008, pp. 26-27, vol. 257, No. 7. |
Notice of Allowance from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/609,896 dated Oct. 27, 2011. |
Office Action from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/465,277 dated Oct. 20, 2011. |
Office Action from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/562,331 dated Oct. 20, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance from co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,320 dated Oct. 18, 2011. |
Office Action co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/626,349, dated Nov. 22, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/417,162 dated Oct. 1, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/214,126 dated Oct. 4, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/607,780 dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
Final Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,700 dated Oct. 12, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/284,524 dated Oct. 15, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/601,724 dated Oct. 18, 2012. |
Office Action for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/536,765 dated Nov. 30, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/282,186 dated Dec. 17, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120005094 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61042612 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12417211 | Apr 2009 | US |
Child | 13233465 | US |