The present invention relates to a gait assistance device for people with spinal cord injury who preserve hip flexion capacity. In particular, it relates to an active orthosis for gait assistance, by means of actuation of the knee and inertial sensing, for people with spinal cord injury who preserve hip flexion capacity. Moreover, the gait assistance device of the present invention can also be used to assist people, who preserve hip flexion capacity, suffering from stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy and poliomyelitis affecting lower limbs.
A considerable number of people with spinal cord injury maintain certain control over the hip joint, but not the knee or ankle joint. These patients can walk using crutches and passive orthoses (Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis or KAFO) which block the rotation of the knee and limit plantar flexion of the ankle. The problem with this type of gait is that since the knee is always completely extended, there is a need to lift the hip in an unnatural manner to take a step, which entails a very high energy cost, leading patients to use a wheelchair in their daily life.
In a natural gait, flexion of the knee allows lowering the hip during the swing phase, which reduces oscillations of the center of mass, improving the energy efficiency of the gait. The use of a device which makes said flexion of the knee easier would lead people with spinal cord injury to be inclined to walk more instead of using a wheelchair, with the benefits that this would entail for their rehabilitation and health.
There are some active devices on the market, such as C-Brace by Otto Bock, which regulate knee joint stiffness depending on the reading from an inertial sensor measuring leg orientation and a force sensor measuring the reaction upon contact of the foot with the ground (see patent documents U.S. Pat. No. 8,876,912 B2 and US 2010/0125229 A1). The control system blocks the knee in the supporting phase and releases it during the swing phase. However, this device is not intended for use by people with spinal cord injury, but rather patients with a certain capacity to walk with no help, generally with a unilateral lesion. Patent document U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,193 B2 relates to a similar stiffness control device, but plantar sensors are not specified.
There is also another more generic patent document relating to a prosthesis which controls a joint by means of an actuator controlled based on the reading from a sensor (WO 2010/120403 A2), but it only refers to prosthetic devices.
For people with spinal cord injury, even those who have no control over the hip joint, there are exoskeletons for gait assistance such as ReWalk (ReWalk Robotics Ltd, Israel), Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, USA), HAL (Cyberdyne Inc, Japan), Exo-H2 (Technaid SL, Spain), etc. They are large and very expensive devices that act on the ankle, knee and/or hip joints by means of electric motors or functional electrical stimulation.
The present invention relates to a gait assistance system for people with spinal cord injury that preserve hip flexion capacity, solving the problems and limitations of the state of the art. Moreover, the gait assistance device of the present invention can also be used to assist people, who preserve hip flexion capacity, suffering from stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy and poliomyelitis affecting lower limbs.
The gait assistance device of the present invention can be used to assist walking in people suffering from the above cited diseases, without the need of a specific adaptation for the individual diseases.
More particularly it relates to a system to assist walking including at least a first orthosis for the leg of the user, where said orthosis has a support for the foot, a lower structure for the calf, an upper structure for the thigh, a lower articulation between the lower structure and the support for the foot. It also has an upper articulation between the lower structure and the upper structure. This system further incorporates an array of sensors for measuring at least the following variables:
This system also includes an actuator coupled to the upper articulation for setting the angle of flexion (αr) when it is activated by a control unit. Said control unit detects the need to apply a subsequent leg flexion-extension cycle according to the values measured by the preceding sensors. Said flexion-extension cycle is applied by changing the angle of flexion (αr) with the actuator of the upper articulation (knee).
Optionally, the plurality of sensors includes a uniaxial gyroscope and at least two uniaxial accelerometers.
Preferably, the system includes a second orthosis for the opposite leg of the user.
Optionally, the control unit can detect a subsequent leg flexion-extension cycle depending on the values measured by the sensors of the opposite leg.
Optionally, the control unit can detect a subsequent leg flexion-extension cycle when the vertical acceleration (αz) of said leg increases above a threshold.
Optionally, the control unit can detect a subsequent leg flexion-extension cycle when the vertical acceleration (αz) of the opposite leg remains below a threshold for a period of time.
Optionally, the control unit can detect a subsequent leg flexion-extension cycle depending on the angular velocity of the opposite leg.
Optionally, the actuator associated with the upper articulation can apply a variable angle depending on time during a flexion-extension cycle.
Optionally, the array of sensors for measuring the position of the leg includes at least one uniaxial gyroscope and two uniaxial accelerometers.
Optionally, the flexion-extension cycle is set and started when intention to walk is detected from the data of the array of sensors.
Optionally, the flexion of the knee is defined in each instant depending on the inclination of the opposite leg, or on the angular velocity of the opposite leg.
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention refers to the use of the system to assist walking, as defined above, in people who preserve hip flexion capacity suffering from spinal cord injury, stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy and poliomyelitis affecting lower limbs.
In another preferred embodiment, the present invention refers to a system to assist walking in people who preserve hip flexion capacity suffering from spinal cord injury, stroke, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy and poliomyelitis affecting lower limbs, the system comprising:
Some embodiments of the invention will be described below by way of non-limiting example in reference to the attached drawings, in which:
A device, which is an embodiment of the invention, can be seen in
Again,
As can be seen in
In a second embodiment, the system would be installed in two orthoses, one for each leg. Each orthosis has its own actuator (5) and array of sensors (6) that are connected to a control unit (7). Therefore, for each leg, information both from its own sensors and the sensors of the opposite leg can be used, if necessary. The possibility of using the data from the sensors of one limb for controlling the opposite limb can serve to improve the interpretation of the data from the sensors. It is therefore considered that the cycle depends on the state of the opposite leg, whereby the angle αr of the right knee would be dynamically defined based on the progression of the left leg (inclination and/or speed of rotation).
In one variant of the invention, flexion with a specific pace can be implemented in the actual actuator of the upper articulation (5) (corresponding to the knee) to adapt it to the desired gait by flexing/extending, once a cycle has been detected. In that case, the actuator incorporates a controller so that the motors determine a preset path (e.g., according to a time history of the flexion-extension of the knee).
Optionally, the desired flexion/extension characteristics can be established according to user preferences, so it may follow a curve different from that shown in
With these verifications, safety ranges can be established to prevent a cycle from being started when the user does not actually have any intention to walk.
The main steps carried out to decide, among others, on the moment in which the cycle must be started is explained in further detail in the following paragraphs. Variables are initialized in a first step (P0). As soon as the user lifts his/her heel, an upward vertical acceleration αz which is captured by the accelerometer is produced. If it exceeds an activation threshold αzth (P3), it is considered that the heel is being lifted, and in principle the flexion-extension cycle would be started.
A problem related to the foregoing is that this acceleration is not only exceeded upon lifting the heel, but can also occur during the swing and/or in the moment the heel hits the ground after taking a step. To avoid drawing the wrong conclusion, the condition whereby the foot must have first been supported for a minimum time Tα (P2) before exceeding the minimum acceleration can be imposed. The condition of being supported is confirmed by verifying (P14) that the vertical acceleration value remains within a range of standby acceleration ±αzα.
Additionally, for even greater certainty compliance with two other additional conditions can be established at the moment of detection: the angle of inclination of the right leg (θ in
It is highly unlikely that the cycle will start incorrectly when these conditions are complied with. For example, if acceleration occurs in the right leg, the subject must adopt a posture similar to that shown on the left side of
Another example of an elevated acceleration is when the heel hits the ground, but this will not start a cycle either. This is because the foot has not been previously in standby (P2, P14) as it comes from a swing phase, and furthermore the inclinations of the legs do not comply with the conditions (P4, P5), since the leg experiencing acceleration is farther ahead, and therefore inclined backward.
These and other verifications are described in the diagram of
The gray (rhombus-shaped) decision blocks indicate measurements of the sensors, whereas the gray (rectangular) action blocks represent commands sent to the actuator (5).
The steps defined by the algorithm of
The variables shown in the diagram are as follows:
Note: positive inclination is always a forward inclination. Therefore, the parameter θomax will generally have a negative value.
The orthosis is preferably fixed by means of belts. Velcro is used in the upper and lower parts, and a support fastened with buckles can be placed on the knee.
Although cases with two orthoses were mentioned for an alternative embodiment, it may be sufficient for the user to use only one orthosis. The system would therefore only have information from an inertial sensor unit.
In another embodiment, the safety could be additionally increased by measuring the stress supported by the orthosis braces (canes), for example the measurement provided by a sensor, such as a strain gauge bridge.
Several particular embodiments have been described in the present detailed description, but a person skilled in the art will be able to introduce modifications and replace technical features with other equivalent or improved features, depending on the requirements of each case, without departing from the scope of protection defined by the attached claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
ES201600886 | Oct 2016 | ES | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/076482 | 10/17/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/073252 | 4/26/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7985193 | Thorsteinsson et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8876912 | Kampas et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20040116836 | Kawai | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20100125229 | Rudolph et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20160206447 | Auberger et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2015-512287 | Apr 2015 | JP |
2016-530935 | Oct 2016 | JP |
2009140948 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010120403 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011058641 | May 2011 | WO |
2013049658 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013142777 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Eva Pröbsting et al., “Safety and walking ability of KAFO users with the C-Brace® Orthotronic Mobility System, a new microprocessor stance and swing control orthosis”, May 4, 2016, Prosthetic and Orthosis International, pp. 1-13. |
Juan C. Moreno et al., “Design and implementation of an inertial measurement unit for control of artificial limbs: Application on legs orthoses”, Sensors and Actuators B, Oct. 25, 2006, vol. 118, Nos. 1-2, pp. 333-337. |
T. Suga et al., “Newly designed computer controlled knee-ankle-foot orthosis (Intelligent Orthosis)”, 1998, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 230-239. |
J. Moreno et al., “Una aproximacion a la compensación y valoración funcional de marcha humana”, Apr. 7, 2015 (with English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190231573 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |