System to automatically process components on a device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9092286
  • Patent Number
    9,092,286
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 18, 2003
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 28, 2015
    8 years ago
Abstract
System to automatically process components on a device. A method is provided for automatically processing components on a device. The method includes receiving a version identifier associated with an action list, determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to a stored version identifier, receiving the action list, parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier and an associated action, and performing the action on a component identified by the component identifier.
Description
BACKGROUND

I. Field


The present invention relates generally to the processing of components on a device, and more particularly, to a system for automatically installing, updating, or removing components on a device.


II. Description of the Related Art


Data networks provide a way for a large numbers of users to communicate with each other using a variety of network-enabled devices. For example, in a wireless communication network, a variety of network-enabled portable telephones allow users to communicate with each other over great distances. The network-enabled devices are generally configured with a variety of installed components that control how the device operates, and ultimately, how well the overall network performs.


In certain circumstances a network operator would like to upgrade, install, delete, or otherwise change the configuration of the network-enabled devices. For example, as system software is improved, the network operator would like to have new components installed on all devices in the network so that the network operates more efficiently. For example, the network operator may like to install application software, a binary executable, or other information on the devices to provide service improvements or upgrades. In another situation, the network operator may desire to install enterprise applications or other device upgrade applications based on the needs of a specific type of device. Furthermore, if it is determined that a problem exists with a currently installed system component, the network operator would like to install an upgraded component to repair the problem, regardless of whether the device user is even aware that the problem exists. For example, if a problem exists with a current device component that allows a user to view multimedia content, the network operator would like to upgrade all the devices on the network to replace this component with a new component that does not have the problem.


One technique used to install, upgrade, delete, or otherwise change the components on a device is to wait for the device user to return the device to a repair center. Once at the repair center, repair personnel can reprogram the device so that the device has the most recent component versions. Unfortunately, this process is very inefficient because device users may fail to return the device if they are unaware of the problem, or if the problem is not currently affecting how they used the device. Because not all of the devices will be upgraded, some devices will not operate to provide the best performance and the overall operation of the network may be degraded.


Therefore, what is needed is a system to automatically process components on a device to allow selected versions of components to be installed and activated. The system should be flexible enough to process the components on a large number of devices in a relatively short time, thereby providing fast upgrades to all devices operating on a network, which will result in the best device performance and increased network efficiency.


SUMMARY

In one or more embodiments, a system is provided to automatically process components on a device. For example, in one embodiment, the system allows a device to install, update, delete, activate, disable, recall or otherwise change the state of a component on a device using a versioned action list available on a download server.


The components that can be processed may be of any type, for example, an application, executable, configuration information, user interface settings, random data, or any other type of information.


During operation of the system, the device checks the version of the action list on the download server against a stored version associated with the last action list processed by the device. If the two versions are different, the device downloads the new action list from the server and parses each item in the action list to process components on the device. In one embodiment, each item in the action list comprises a component/action pair that associates a component identifier with an action identifier.


The component identifier identifies a type of component and its current version. The action identifier identifies an action to be performed by the device with respect to the identified component.


In one embodiment, the device parses each component/action pair in the action list to determine whether an action needs to be performed for the identified component.


The device compares the version of the component in the action list to a component version stored on the device. If the two component versions are the same, the device takes no action with regards to that component/action pair. If the versions are different, the device performs the action associated with the component in the action list. For example, if the action is to install the identified component, the device downloads the component, and any other necessary information from the download server, and installs the component on the device. Thus, the device steps through the action list performing the designated actions only on new component versions.


After processing a particular component/action pair, the component version stored on the device is updated with the new component version provided in the action list. When the entire action list has been processed, the device records the version identifier of the action list, so as to avoid re-processing the current action list in the future. Thus, the device will not process another action list until the version of the action list available on the download server is different from the stored version on the device.


In one embodiment, the device checks the version of the action list every time the device communicates with the download server. For example, the device may communicate with the download server after the device is powered on or at periodic intervals. The system provides a mechanism to allow components to be processed on the device with no user interaction or limited user interaction. For example, in one embodiment, components may be pushed to a device at power up to effectively provide a “silent installation.” In another embodiment, a user interface is provided so that the component processing may be at the option of the user. Thus, the system allows the component processing to be forced, prompted, required, or optional.


The system may be used to process components on a single device or on a large number of devices. For example, in a data network where are large number of devices can access an action list server, a single action list can be delivered to all devices and each device can determine what components to process for that device. In another embodiment, the server may provide multiple action lists that can be used for different device types. For example, different types of devices may access a different action list to process components for that type of device. Thus, it is possible for the system to provide global updates to a large number of devices, where the updates are performed over a period of hours or days as each device contacts the action list server.


Additionally, communication between the server and a device can be performed using any type of secure communication technique, such as encryption or any type of encoding, so that the devices can be authenticated and any transmission of information is done in a secure fashion.


In one embodiment, a method is provided for automatically processing components on a device. The method comprises receiving a version identifier associated with an action list, determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to a stored version identifier, receiving the action list, parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier and an associated action, and performing the action on a component identified by the component identifier.


In one embodiment, apparatus is provided for automatically processing components on a device. The apparatus comprises logic to receive a version identifier associated with an action list, and logic to compare the version identifier to a stored version identifier. The apparatus also comprises logic to receive the action list if the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier, and logic to parse the action list to obtain a component identifier and an associated action. The apparatus also comprises logic to perform the action on a component identified by the component identifier.


In one embodiment, apparatus is provided for automatically processing components on a device. The apparatus comprises means for receiving a version identifier associated with an action list, and means for determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to a stored version identifier. The apparatus also comprises means for receiving the action list, and means for parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier and an associated action. The apparatus also comprises means for performing the action on a component identified by the component identifier.


In one embodiment, a computer-readable media is provided comprising instructions, which when executed by processing logic in a device, operate to automatically process components on the device. The computer-readable media comprises instructions for receiving a version identifier associated with an action list, and instructions for determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to a stored version identifier. The computer-readable media also comprises instructions for receiving the action list, and instructions for parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier and an associated action. The computer-readable media also comprises instructions for performing the action on a component identified by the component identifier.


Other aspects, advantages, and features of the present invention will become apparent after review of the hereinafter set forth Brief Description of the Drawings, Detailed Description of the Invention, and the Claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and the attendant advantages of the embodiments described herein will become more readily apparent by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a system to automatically process components on a device;



FIG. 2 shows a functional diagram of a device that includes one embodiment of a system to automatically process components;



FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of a method for operating a device to provide a system to automatically process components on the device;



FIG. 4 shows transactions that occur between a download server and a device during operation of one embodiment of a system to automatically process components on the device; and



FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of an action list for use in a system to automatically process components on a device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description describes embodiments of a system to automatically process components on a device. The system is suitable for use in any type of wired or wireless network, including but not limited to, communication networks, public networks, such as the Internet, private networks, such as virtual private networks (VPN), local area networks, wide area networks, long haul network, or any other type of data network. The system is also suitable for use with any type of device that is capable of downloading and installing components. For example, the system is suitable for use with office computers, notebook computers, and handheld devices, such as portable telephones, PDAs, or any other type of device capable of receiving and installing components.


In one or more embodiments, the system interacts with a runtime environment executing on the device that is used to simplify operation of the device, such as by providing generalized calls for device specific resources. One such runtime environment is the Binary Runtime Environment for Wireless™ (BREW™) software platform developed by QUALCOMM, Inc., of San Diego, Calif. In the following description, it will be assumed that the device is executing a runtime environment, such as the BREW software platform. However, one or more embodiments of the system are suitable for use with other types of runtime environments to automatically process components on a variety of wired and wireless devices.



FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of a system 100 to automatically process components on a device. The system 100 comprises a server 102, a data network 104, and a device 106. The data network 104 may be any type of wired or wireless network that allows information to be communicated between the server 102 and the device 106.


For example, the network 104 may be a communication network, wide area network, virtual private network, or a public network, such as the Internet.


In one or more embodiments, the system operates to process components on the device 106. For example, the server 102 includes components 112, an action list 110, and an action list version identifier 108. The version identifier 108 identifies the current version of the action list 110. The action list 110 comprises component/action pairs where each pair comprises a component identifier and an action identifier. The component identifier is a unique item ID that identifies a particular component. A portion of the component identifier is used to identify a version of the component. For example, the component identifier is a series of bits where a portion of the bits is used to identify the version of the component. The action identifier identifies a particular action, such as install, update, delete, recall, disable, or any other action that the device 106 will perform with regards to the identified component.


During operation, the server 102 transmits the action list version identifier 108 to the device 106 via the network 104. For example, the device 106 may contact the server 102 during a power up sequence and the server 102 responds by transmitting the action list version identifier 108 to the device 106. The device 106 compares the version identifier 108 with a stored version identifier 114 that represents the version of the last action list to be processed by the device 106. If the downloaded version 108 and the stored version 114 are equivalent, then the device does not need to perform any installations or changes to the existing components 116 on the device. However, if the downloaded version 108 is different from the stored version 114, then the device 106 knows that additional component processing is required. For example, there may be new components located at the server 102 that need to be installed on the device 106.


Once the device 106 detects that a new version of the action list exists, it transmits a request to the server 102 to obtain the new action list 110. The server 102 responds by transmitting the action list 110 to the device 106. The device 106 then processes the action list 110 to install, update, delete or otherwise process components identified in the action list 110.


The device 106 operates to process the action list 110 by stepping through each component/action pair and determining whether or not to take action with regard to each component. For example, if the action list specifies that a component needs to be installed or updated, the device 106 downloads the component 112 and any other required files from the server 102 and installs it on the device 106. For example, information from the server 102 transmitted to the device 106 is shown generally at 120.


If the action list 110 specifies that a component needs to be deleted, the device 106 deletes the component. Thus, each component/action pair in the action list 110 is processed by the device 106 to automatically install, update, delete, etc., the identified component. The action list may be of any length and after processing the action list, the device 106 updates the stored action list version identifier 114 to store the version of the most recently processed action list (i.e., version 108).


In one embodiment, the device 106 parses the component/action pairs in the action list 110 to determine whether or not action related to a particular component needs to be taken. For example, the device 106 may already have the newest version of a component installed, and so it is not necessary for the device to re-install that component. In one embodiment, the component identifier in the action list 110 includes information to determine the version of the component. For example, the version information can be appended to the end of the component identifier. The device 106 compares a stored component version 118 to the component version downloaded in the action list 110. If the stored and downloaded component versions are the same, then the device need not take any action with regards to that component. However, if the stored and downloaded component versions are different, then the device 106 performs the action associated with that component in the action list. Thus, the system is very efficient, since the device 106 only processes new versions of the components.



FIG. 2 shows a functional diagram of a device 200 that includes one embodiment of a system to automatically process components on the device 200. The device comprises processing logic 208, compare logic 206, function logic 214, version update logic 224, a stored action list version identifier 204, component version identifiers 212, and installed components 226. The described logic and functions provided by the device 200 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. For example, in one or more embodiments, the processing logic 208 comprises a CPU, processor, gate array, hardware logic, memory elements, virtual machine, software, and/or any combination of hardware and software.


Thus, the processing logic 208 generally comprises logic to execute machine-readable instructions to perform the functions described herein. It should be noted that the device 200 illustrates just one embodiment and that changes, additions, or rearrangements of the device elements may be made without deviating from the scope of the invention.



FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of a method 300 for operating a device, such as device 200, to provide a system to automatically process components on the device 200.


For the purposes of clarity, the method 300 will be described with reference to the device 200 shown in FIG. 2. It will further be assumed that the device 200 is in secure communication with a download server via a data network, as illustrated in FIG. 1.


At block 302, the device obtains an action list version identifier from the download server. For example, the device communicates with the download server via a data network and the download server transmits the action list version identifier to the device, as shown at 202.


At block 304, a test is performed to determine if the downloaded action list version identifier is different from a stored version identifier that is associated with the last action list to be processed by the device. For example, the downloaded version identifier 202 and the stored version identifier 204 are input to compare logic 206 that compares the two identifiers to determine if they are equivalent. If the two version identifiers are equivalent, the method returns to block 302 to obtain a new version of the action list at another time. If the two version identifiers are different (Diff), the method proceeds to block 306.


At block 306, the device retrieves the action list from the download server. For example, the action list 210 is downloaded from the server to the processing logic 208 via the data network.


At block 308, the device begins processing the action list by parsing the first component/action pair in the action list. For example, the processing logic 208 operates to process the downloaded action list 210 to parse the component/action pairs.


At block 310, a test is performed to determine what action, if any, is required for the component/action pair that is currently being processed. In one embodiment, the device operates to automatically perform the action by proceeding to block 312.


However, this may result in existing components being re-installed on the device. In another embodiment, the version of the component is checked to determine if the action is necessary. For example, if the action is to “install” the component, the version of the component is checked to see if the device has that version of the component currently installed. Thus, the method operates to avoid re-installing components that are already installed on the device. For example, the processing logic 208 retrieves a stored component version identifier 212 and compares it to the version of the component identified in the action list. In one embodiment, the version of the component is incorporated in the component identifier provided in the action list. If the two component versions are the same, no further action is required with regards to that component and the method proceeds to block 416. If the two component versions are different, then the processing logic 208 operates to perform the action associated with the component and the method proceeds to block 312.


At block 312, the action associated with the component in the current component/action pair is performed to change the state of the identified component. For example, the processing logic 208 operates to control the action logic 214 to perform the action of installing, updating, deleting, activating, disabling, recalling or otherwise changing the state of the identified component. For example, a soft recall may be performed where the component is deleted from the device but associated data and/or licensing information is not removed. For example, if the action is to install or update the component, the processing logic 208 operates to download the component 222 (or update) from the download server via the data network. The downloaded component is then installed as an installed component 226. The processing logic 208 may perform any type of installation or update procedure to install or update the downloaded component 222 as an installed component 226. If the action is to delete a component, the processing logic 208 controls the delete logic 220 to delete the identified component from the installed components 226. Although not shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, virtually any type of action may be performed with regards to the component, such as installing, updating, deleting, recalling, activating, and deactivating, etc.


At block 314, a component version list is updated to reflect that a new version of the component has been installed or updated, or that the component has been deleted.


For example, the processing logic 208 controls the version update logic 224 to update the stored component version identifiers 212 with the new information about the currently processed component.


At block 316, a test is performed to determine if all of the component/action pairs in the action list have been processed. If all pairs have been processed, the method proceeds to block 320. If all pairs have not been processed, the method proceeds to block 318 where the next pair is accessed for processing at block 310. The action list 210 may be any length and so there may exist any number of component/action pairs to be processed.


At block 320, the stored action list version identifier at the device is updated.


For example, the processing logic 208 controls the update version logic 224 to update the stored action list version identifier 204 with the identifier associated with the most recently processed action list. Thus, the system will not operate to process another action list until a new version of the action list is available.


In one embodiment, the system for automatically processing components on the device comprises program instructions stored on a computer-readable media, which when executed by the processing logic 208, provides the functions described herein.


For example, instructions may be loaded into the device 200 from a computer-readable media, such as a floppy disk, CDROM, memory card, FLASH memory device, RAM, ROM, or any other type of memory device or computer-readable media that interfaces to the device 200. In another embodiment, the instructions may be downloaded into the device 200 from a network resource that interfaces to the device 200 via a data network. The instructions, when executed by the processing logic 208, provide one or more embodiments of a system for automatically processing components on the device as described herein.


It should be noted that the method 300 illustrates just one embodiment and that changes, additions, or rearrangements of the method elements may be made without deviating from the scope of the invention.



FIG. 4 shows transactions 400 that occur between a download server and a device during operation of one embodiment of a system to automatically process components on the device. For example, the transaction 400 may occur between the device 106 and the server 102 shown in FIG. 1.


At the start of the automatic process, the device 106 requests the latest version identifier of an action list from the server 102, as shown at 402. The action list comprises component/action pairs that describe an action the device should perform with respect to each identified component. The action list may be changed or updated periodically and the action list version identifier identifies the current version of the action list.


The server 102 responds to the request from the device 102 by transmitting the version identifier of the current action list, as shown at 404. After receiving the action list version identifier, the device compares that identifier with a stored action list version identifier. If the two version identifiers are equivalent, then the device takes no further action. If the two version identifiers are different, then the device 102 requests a new action list from the server 102, as shown at 406.


The server 102 responds to the request from the device 106 by transmitting the new action list, as shown at 408. The device 106 processes each component/action pair in the action list to determine whether or not to install, update, or delete a particular component. If the device 106 determines that a particular component needs to be installed or updated, the device 106 requests the component (or update) from the server 102 as shown at 410.


The server 102 responds to the request by transmitting the requested component to the device 106. The device 106 receives the component and performs the installation or update as required. The component may have a component version identifier that the device stores locally. After the device 106 parses the entire action list and retrieves all the needed components from the server 102 as necessary, the device 106 updates a locally stored action list version identifier with the version of the action list that was just processed. Thus, the device 106 will not process another action list from the server 102 until the action list version identifier downloaded from the server is different from the stored identifier.



FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of an action list 500 for use in a system to automatically process components on a device. The action list 500 comprises an action list version identifier 502 followed by component/action pairs (504, 506). For example, component/action pair 504 comprises a component identifier and a corresponding action. In one embodiment, the component identifier also includes a component version identifier, so that the version of the component can be used to determine whether or not the component currently exists on the device. The action may be one of “install”, “update”, or “delete” however, any other type of action may be specified. The information in the action list may be encoded using any suitable format and the component and action identifiers may be of any type.


Accordingly, while one or more embodiments of a system to automatically process components on a device have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made to the embodiments without departing from their spirit or essential characteristics. Therefore, the disclosures and descriptions herein are intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention, which is set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for automatically processing components on a device, the method comprising: receiving a version identifier of an action list, wherein the action list includes a component-specific set of actions to be selectively performed for each of a plurality of different components, each of the plurality of different components being a device-executable application;comparing the version identifier to a stored version identifier;determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;receiving the action list in response to the determination that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier that identifies one of the plurality of different components and an associated action for the identified component from the component-specific set of actions; andperforming the associated action on the identified component.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising updating the stored version identifier to be equivalent to the version identifier.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the associated action is installing and the performing comprises installing the identified component on the device.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the associated action is deleting and the performing comprises deleting the identified component from the device.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing comprises changing a state of the identified component on the device.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the parsing further comprises determining that a component version associated with the component identifier is not equivalent to a stored component version.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising updating the stored component version to be equivalent to the component version.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving the version identifier, the action list, and the identified component from a server.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the device is a wireless device.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the performing performs the associated action irrespective of a magnitude to which the version identifier is different than the stored version identifier.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the component-specific set of actions includes an installing action for installing the associated component, a deleting action for deleting the associated component and/or an updating action for updating the associated component.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the action list further includes at least one component version identifier for at least one of the plurality of different components,wherein the action list includes, for the at least one component, a given component-specific set of actions that includes the installing action and/or the updating action,further comprising:for the at least one component, performing the installing and/or updating actions only if the at least one component version identifier does not match a stored component version identifier for an already installed version of the at least one component on the device.
  • 13. An apparatus for automatically processing components on a device, the apparatus comprising: logic to receive a version identifier of an action list, wherein the action list includes a component-specific set of actions to be selectively performed for each of a plurality of different components, each of the plurality of different components being a device-executable application;logic to compare the version identifier to a stored version identifier;logic to determine that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;logic to receive the action list in response to the determination that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;logic to parse the action list to obtain a component identifier that identifies one of the plurality of different components and an associated action for the identified component from the component-specific set of actions; andlogic to perform the associated action on the identified component,wherein one or more of the logics include (i) a hardware processing circuit, or (ii) a combination of the hardware processing circuit and software stored in a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising logic to update the stored version identifier to be equivalent to the version identifier.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the logic to perform the associated action comprises logic to install the identified component on the device.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the logic to perform the associated action comprises logic to delete the identified component from the device.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the logic to perform the associated action comprises logic to change a state of the identified component on the device.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the logic to parse the action list further comprises logic to determine that a component version associated with the component identifier is not equivalent to a stored component version.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising logic to update the stored component version to be equivalent to the component version.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising logic to receive the version identifier, the action list, and the identified component from a server.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the device is a wireless device.
  • 22. An apparatus for automatically processing components on a device, the apparatus comprising: means for receiving a version identifier of an action list, wherein the action list includes a component-specific set of actions to be selectively performed for each of a plurality of different components, each of the plurality of different components being a device-executable application;means for comparing the version identifier to a stored version identifier;means for determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;means for receiving the action list in response to the determination that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;means for parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier that identifies one of the plurality of different components and an associated action for the identified component from the component-specific set of actions; andmeans for performing the associated action on the identified component.
  • 23. The apparatus of claim 22, further comprising means for updating the stored version identifier to be equivalent to the version identifier.
  • 24. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the means for performing comprises means for installing the identified component on the device.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the means for performing comprises means for deleting the identified component from the device.
  • 26. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the means for performing comprises means for changing a state of the identified component on the device.
  • 27. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the means for parsing further comprises means for determining that a component version associated with the component identifier is not equivalent to a stored component version.
  • 28. The apparatus of claim 27, further comprising means for updating the stored component version to be equivalent to the component version.
  • 29. The apparatus of claim 22, further comprising means for receiving the version identifier, the action list, and the identified component from a server.
  • 30. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the device is a wireless device.
  • 31. A non-transitory computer-readable media comprising instructions, which when executed by processing logic in a device, operate to automatically process components on the device, the non-transitory computer-readable media comprising: instructions for receiving a version identifier of an action list, wherein the action list includes a component-specific set of actions to be selectively performed for each of a plurality of different components, each of the plurality of different components being a device-executable application;instructions for comparing the version identifier to a stored version identifier;instructions for determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;instructions for receiving the action list in response to the determination that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;instructions for parsing the action list to obtain a component identifier that identifies one of the plurality of different components and an associated action from the component-specific set of actions for the identified component; andinstructions for performing the associated action on the identified component.
  • 32. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, further comprising instructions for updating the stored version identifier to be equivalent to the version identifier.
  • 33. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, wherein the instructions for performing comprise instructions for installing the identified component on the device.
  • 34. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, wherein the instructions for performing comprise instructions for deleting the identified component from the device.
  • 35. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, wherein the instructions for performing comprise instructions for changing a state of the identified component on the device.
  • 36. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, wherein the instructions for parsing further comprises instructions for determining that a component version associated with the component identifier is not equivalent to a stored component version.
  • 37. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 36, further comprising instructions for updating the stored component version to be equivalent to the component version.
  • 38. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, further comprising instructions for receiving the version identifier, the action list, and the identified component from a server.
  • 39. The non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 31, wherein the device is a wireless device.
  • 40. A method for automatically processing components on a network-enabled device by allowing the device to install, update or delete a component on the device using a version action list available on a download server, the method comprising: receiving a version identifier of an action list,wherein each item in the action list comprises a component/action pair that associates a component identifier with an action identifier;comparing the version identifier to a stored version identifier of the device;determining that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;receiving the action list in response to the determination that the version identifier is not equivalent to the stored version identifier;parsing each item in the action list to obtain a given component identifier and an associated action; andperforming the associated action on a given component that is identified by the given component identifier,wherein the performing performs the associated action irrespective of a magnitude to which the version identifier is different than the stored version identifier.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This Application claims the benefit of priority of a pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled “AUTO-INSTALL” having Application No. 60/435,486 and filed on Dec. 20, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes. This Application also claims the benefit of priority of a pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled “REGISTRY-BASED AUTO INSTALL COMPONENT HANDLING” having Application No. 60/435,828 and filed on Dec. 20, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (172)
Number Name Date Kind
5155847 Kirouac et al. Oct 1992 A
5473772 Halliwell et al. Dec 1995 A
5564051 Halliwell et al. Oct 1996 A
5612682 DeLuca et al. Mar 1997 A
5761618 Lynch et al. Jun 1998 A
5848064 Cowan Dec 1998 A
5913213 Wikstrom et al. Jun 1999 A
5920821 Seazholtz et al. Jul 1999 A
5995756 Herrmann Nov 1999 A
6006034 Heath et al. Dec 1999 A
6009274 Fletcher et al. Dec 1999 A
6023620 Hansson Feb 2000 A
6031830 Cowan Feb 2000 A
6061683 Alonso May 2000 A
6074434 Cole et al. Jun 2000 A
6128489 Seazholtz et al. Oct 2000 A
6167567 Chiles et al. Dec 2000 A
6199204 Donohue Mar 2001 B1
6272333 Smith Aug 2001 B1
6272677 Lam et al. Aug 2001 B1
6308061 Criss et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314565 Kenner et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327617 Fawcett Dec 2001 B1
6360366 Heath et al. Mar 2002 B1
6389423 Sakakura May 2002 B1
6397060 Oikawa May 2002 B1
6418554 Delo et al. Jul 2002 B1
6493871 McGuire et al. Dec 2002 B1
6564048 Sugita May 2003 B1
6590881 Wallace et al. Jul 2003 B1
6636872 Heath et al. Oct 2003 B1
6643506 Criss et al. Nov 2003 B1
6687901 Imamatsu Feb 2004 B1
6735625 Ponna May 2004 B1
6735766 Chamberlain et al. May 2004 B1
6748209 Lipsit Jun 2004 B2
6754894 Costello et al. Jun 2004 B1
6789255 Pedrizetti et al. Sep 2004 B1
6807415 Sato Oct 2004 B2
6832373 O'Neill Dec 2004 B2
6868455 Ariyama Mar 2005 B1
6877037 Adachi Apr 2005 B1
6909898 Mielke et al. Jun 2005 B2
6961764 Mizoguchi Nov 2005 B2
6966060 Young et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970960 Sarfati Nov 2005 B1
7080371 Arnaiz et al. Jul 2006 B1
7127712 Noble et al. Oct 2006 B1
7140013 Te'eni et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149508 Herle Dec 2006 B2
7149792 Hansen et al. Dec 2006 B1
7194258 Okita et al. Mar 2007 B2
7243163 Friend et al. Jul 2007 B1
7281245 Reynar et al. Oct 2007 B2
7287097 Friend et al. Oct 2007 B1
7391759 Wallace et al. Jun 2008 B2
7415706 Raju et al. Aug 2008 B1
7512638 Jhaveri et al. Mar 2009 B2
7516451 Peng Apr 2009 B2
7529780 Braginsky et al. May 2009 B1
7530065 Ciudad et al. May 2009 B1
7555750 Lilley Jun 2009 B1
7596720 Curtis et al. Sep 2009 B2
7603447 Hodgson Oct 2009 B2
7657886 Chen et al. Feb 2010 B1
7669197 O'Neill et al. Feb 2010 B1
7676792 Irie et al. Mar 2010 B2
7698698 Skan Apr 2010 B2
7747567 Teegan et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752626 Pandey et al. Jul 2010 B1
7788662 Haselden et al. Aug 2010 B2
7797695 Motta Sep 2010 B2
7840957 Kumashiro et al. Nov 2010 B2
7844964 Marolia Nov 2010 B2
7870412 Maes Jan 2011 B2
7958502 Motta et al. Jun 2011 B2
7971199 Chen Jun 2011 B1
7974613 Shanker et al. Jul 2011 B1
7987449 Marolia et al. Jul 2011 B1
8245218 Giambalvo et al. Aug 2012 B2
8311981 Braginsky et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316224 Vidal et al. Nov 2012 B2
8340635 Herz et al. Dec 2012 B2
8443361 Vidal et al. May 2013 B2
8495621 Traut et al. Jul 2013 B2
8522232 Carter et al. Aug 2013 B1
8555273 Chia et al. Oct 2013 B1
8595715 Ward et al. Nov 2013 B2
8612398 Jarrett et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612516 Mallur et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612961 Stewart Dec 2013 B2
8620272 Ganatra et al. Dec 2013 B2
8626146 Koganti et al. Jan 2014 B2
8635608 Ramesh et al. Jan 2014 B2
8762977 Olsson et al. Jun 2014 B2
8893109 Birtwhistle et al. Nov 2014 B2
8918775 Carpenter et al. Dec 2014 B1
20010029178 Criss et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010029605 Forbes et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010048728 Peng Dec 2001 A1
20010052052 Peng Dec 2001 A1
20010053688 Rignell et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020016956 Fawcett Feb 2002 A1
20020077094 Leppanen Jun 2002 A1
20020078209 Peng Jun 2002 A1
20020091799 Katz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100035 Kenyon et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020131404 Mehta et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020157090 Anton, Jr. Oct 2002 A1
20020177437 Chesavage et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020178178 Peng Nov 2002 A1
20020194578 Irie et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030023516 Sharrow et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030046676 Cheng et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078036 Chang et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030100297 Riordan et al. May 2003 A1
20030105847 Jennery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124974 Asami Jul 2003 A1
20030143991 Minear et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030145315 Aro et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040003266 Moshir et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003389 Reynar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040006630 Friend et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015953 Vincent Jan 2004 A1
20040024795 Hind et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038675 Criss et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040068724 Gardner et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040107417 Chia et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117785 Kincaid Jun 2004 A1
20040158817 Okachi et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181790 Herrick Sep 2004 A1
20040188510 Sprigg et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040205745 Piazza Oct 2004 A1
20040224674 O'Farrell et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040230965 Okkonen Nov 2004 A1
20050044235 Balahura et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050118991 Koganti et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050132357 Shell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050268296 Marolia et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010437 Marolia Jan 2006 A1
20060031262 Satoh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060037001 Irie et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060107260 Motta May 2006 A1
20060206888 Mavrinac et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060277408 Bhat et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070006222 Maier et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070067765 Motta et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074203 Curtis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070169073 O'Neill et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070169093 Logan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070293212 Quon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080003991 Sievers et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080028385 Brown et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080148250 Motta Jun 2008 A1
20080270481 Augustine Oct 2008 A1
20080270485 Yu et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281828 Swartz et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090077263 Koganti et al. Mar 2009 A1
20100242034 Rugh et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110055544 Vidal et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110055826 Vidal et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078675 Van Camp et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110252415 Ricci Oct 2011 A1
20120180037 McCaleb et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130047145 Cui Feb 2013 A1
20130139139 Mallur et al. May 2013 A1
20130198732 Fujita, Masatoshi Aug 2013 A1
20130326493 Poonamalli et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140053145 Steigleder Feb 2014 A1
20140128054 Koganti et al. May 2014 A1
20140130035 Desai et al. May 2014 A1
20140208306 Halder et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number Date Country
1288199 Mar 2001 CN
1937533 Mar 2007 CN
19543843 May 1997 DE
0841615 May 1998 EP
0959635 Nov 1999 EP
1672545 Jun 2006 EP
2348721 Oct 2000 GB
1198477 Aug 1989 JP
5210507 Aug 1993 JP
08106393 Apr 1996 JP
9292980 Nov 1997 JP
10021061 Jan 1998 JP
10049354 Feb 1998 JP
11110197 Apr 1999 JP
11225359 Aug 1999 JP
H11331937 Nov 1999 JP
11514760 Dec 1999 JP
2000132355 May 2000 JP
2000132397 May 2000 JP
2000276335 Oct 2000 JP
2001043073 Feb 2001 JP
2001053882 Feb 2001 JP
2001101219 Apr 2001 JP
2001251380 Sep 2001 JP
2001256053 Sep 2001 JP
2001296994 Oct 2001 JP
2001337832 Dec 2001 JP
2001356912 Dec 2001 JP
2002215692 Aug 2002 JP
2002278767 Sep 2002 JP
2005174048 Jun 2005 JP
2008536344 Sep 2008 JP
2009134589 Jun 2009 JP
2012091840 May 2012 JP
19990057991 Jul 1999 KR
1020020009741 Feb 2002 KR
20030030044 Apr 2003 KR
20030033396 May 2003 KR
20040069963 Aug 2004 KR
2233033 Jul 2004 RU
361057 Jun 1999 TW
448404 Aug 2001 TW
473660 Jan 2002 TW
503368 Sep 2002 TW
WO9102313 Feb 1991 WO
WO9729606 Aug 1997 WO
WO9838820 Sep 1998 WO
WO9945465 Sep 1999 WO
WO-0035117 Jun 2000 WO
WO0077614 Dec 2000 WO
WO0169888 Sep 2001 WO
WO0193030 Dec 2001 WO
WO0246914 Jun 2002 WO
WO02075525 Sep 2002 WO
WO-03083667 Oct 2003 WO
WO-2007056954 May 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (80)
Entry
Zdenék Tronićek, “Semi-Automatic Component Upgrade with RefactoringNG”, 2011 IEEE, pp. 907-910; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6078310>.
Grundy et al., “Engineering plug-in SW components to support collaborative work”, Software—Practice and Experience, vol. 32, Wiley, pp. 938-1013, 2002; <https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/˜john.../spe2002.p . . . >.
Valerio Panzica La Manna, “Dynamic Software Update for Component-based Distributed Systems”, Jun. 2011, Boulder, Colorado, USA, pp. 1-8; <http://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?h=1&source—query=&&cfid=304794976&cftoken=79323359>.
Lucrédio et al., “Orion—A Component-Based Software Engineering Environment”, Apr. 2004, Journal of Object Technology, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 51-74; <http://www.researchgate.net/publication/220299278—l A—Component-Based—Software—Engineering—Environment/file/9c960518a5c811582e.pdf>.
Gui et al., “A framework for adaptive real-time applications: the declarative real-time OSGi component model”, 2008 ACM, ARM 2008, Dec. 1, 2008 Leuven, Belgium, pp. 35-40; <http://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?h=1&cfid=527242570&cftoken=94290806>.
Yang et al., “A Component-based Software Framework for Product Lifecycle Information Management for Consumer Products”, May 2007 IEEE, pp. 1195-1203; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4341604>.
Tijs van der Storm “Continuous Release and Upgrade of Component-Based Software”, 2005 ACM, Sep. 5, 2005, SCM'05, pp. 43-57; <http://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?h=1&cfid=603384239&cftoken=64589296>.
Zden{hacek over (e)}k Troni{hacek over (c)}ek, “Semi-Automatic Component Upgrade with RefactoringNG”, 2011 IEEE, Sep. 18, 2011, FedCSIS, pp. 907-910; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6078310>.
Baggiolini et al., “Toward Automatic, Run-time Fault Management for Component-Based Applications”, 1998 Springer, pp. 1-5; <http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-69687-3—67.pdf>.
Tien N. Nguyen, “Component-based Software Update Process in Collaborative Software Development”, 2008 IEEE, APSEC'08, Dec. 3-5, 2008, pp. 437-444; <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4724576>.
Gu et al., “Low-disruptive Dynamic Updating of Java Applications”, 2014 Elsevier, vol. 56, Issue 9, Sep. 2014, pp. 1086-1098; <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584914000846>.
Annosi et al., “Managing and Assessing the Risk of Component Upgrades”, 2012 IEEE, PLEASE'12, Jun. 4, 2012, pp. 9-12; <http://dl.acm.org/results.cfm?h=1&cfid=646836014&cftoken=84377714>.
Written Opinion—PCT/US03/040926—IPEA, US—Oct. 9, 2008.
Advisory Action mailed Dec. 4, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Advisory Action mailed Jan. 22, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Advisory Action mailed Jul. 17, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Advisory Action mailed Mar. 19, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Advisory Action mailed Sep. 10, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Appeal Brief mailed Dec. 9, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Appeal Brief mailed Mar. 25, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Final Office Action mailed Dec. 17, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Final Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Final Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 9, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Final Office Action mailed May 18, 2004, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Final Office Action mailed Nov. 2, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Final Office Action mailed Oct. 6, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
International Search Report—PCT/US03/040926, International Search Authority, European Patent Office, Sep. 2, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 29, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 7, 2003, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jul. 26, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 28, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 31, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 26, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Aug. 29, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 18, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 22, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 16, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Final Office Action mailed May 9, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 21, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2004, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 22, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 23, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 22, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 28, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Dec. 23, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2004, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Jan. 31, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 4, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,355, filed Dec. 18, 2003.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed May 26, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/061,875, filed Jan. 31, 2002.
Response to Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/975,973, filed Oct. 27, 2004.
Supplementary European Search Report—EP03800088, Search Authority—Munich Patent Office, May 13, 2009.
Taiwanese Search Report—092136239—TIPO—Dec. 15, 2009.
Dolgolaptev, V.G., “Rabota v Windows 95 na primerakh”, (Operation in Windows 95 by Examples)—Moscow, Vostochnaya Knizhnaya Kompania (East Book Company), published on 1997, 464 pp.
Castro P., et al., “Before-Commit Client State Management Services for AJAX Applications”, Hot Topics In Web Systems And Technologies, 2006. HOTWEB '06. 1st IEEE Workshop on, IEEE, PI, Nov. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, XP031082790, ISBN: 978-1-4244-0595-4, abstract sections I., II.C, II.D, III., IV.F, IV.G, V.C, V.D, VII.
Mesbah A., et al., “An Architectural Style for Ajax”, Software Architecture, 2007, WICSA '07. The Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 1-10, XP031013840 ISBN: 978-0-7695-2744-4, abstract sections 2.2, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.
Open Mobile Alliance, “DS Protocol Approved Version 1.2 OMA-TS-DS—Protocol-V1—2-2- 20060710-A”, Internet Citation, [Online] Jul. 10, 2006, XP002456758 Retrieved from the internet: <http://www.openmobilealliance.org/release—program/docs/DS/V1—L 2-2-200607 10-A/OMA-TS-DS-Protocol-V1—2-20060710-A.pdf> [retrieved on Oct. 26, 2007] sections 5., 5.12, 9.
OMA “SyncML HTTP Binding,” Approved version 1.2—Feb. 21, 2007, Open Mobile Alliance, OMA-TS-SyncML—HTTPBinding-V1—2-20070221-A, pp. 1-24.
OMA “SyncML Meta Information,” Approved version 1.2—Feb. 21, 2007, Open Mobile Alliance, OMA-TS-SyncML—MetaInfo-V1—2-20070221-A, pp. 1-25.
OMA “SyncML OBEX Binding,” Approved version 1.2—Feb. 21, 2007, Open Mobile Alliance, OMA-TS-SyncML—OBEXBinding-V1—2-20070221-A, pp. 1-30.
OMA “SyncML Representation Protocol,” Approved version 1.2—Feb. 21, 2007, Open Mobile Alliance, OMA-SyncML-RepPro-V1—2-20070221-A, pp. 1-60.
OMA “SyncML Server Alerted Notification,” Approved version 1.2—Feb. 21, 2007, Open Mobile Alliance, OMA-TS-SyncML—SAN-V1—2-20070221-A, pp. 1-17.
OMA “SyncML WSPBinding,” Approved version 1.2—Feb. 21, 2007, Open Mobile Alliance, OMA-TS-SyncML—WSPBinding-V1—2-20070221-A, pp. 1-17.
SyncML Representation Protocol, Version 1.0.1, [retrieved on Jun. 15, 2001], 105 Pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.syncml.org/docs/syncml—represent—v101—20010615.pdf.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040188511 A1 Sep 2004 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60435486 Dec 2002 US
60435828 Dec 2002 US