This invention relates to electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and any other vehicles with batteries, specifically to recharge such vehicles whose battery needs to be electrically charged.
A plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) is an automobile which can use either electricity or gasoline. With today's high gas prices, electricity is becoming a promising alternative to power next generation automobiles. Battery electric vehicles (BEV) which use only electricity, also hold promise as a viable alternative to automobiles that just use petroleum-based fuels.
PHEV's which could have battery capacities equivalent to 10's of miles of driving are best suited for commuters who need to do short trips most of the time. An additional advantage of the PHEV is that charging can be done at home without the need of going to a gasoline station. Nonetheless, the small battery capacity of PHEV's may require recharging the batteries almost everyday. It would be convenient for an owner of a car with batteries to not have to plug in the battery each and every day that charging is required.
The invention is a system and method which are defined by the claims which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Our invention is a system that plugs the power automatically into the vehicle with minimal intervention. The system is composed of a robotic manipulator with a camera and a processing unit. The system uses the camera and vision processing techniques to identify the vehicle's position. The robotic manipulator then directs the charging cord's plug into the charging receptacle of the vehicle. Once charging is complete, the robotic manipulator removes the plug from the vehicle and returns to a neutral position.
The invention is designed to make it easier to maintain electric vehicles, such as PHEV's and BEV's which can be charged by an external source. By having a charger that requires minimal human intervention, the user does not have to worry about the hassle of plugging and unplugging the charger everyday. The invention can be placed in a garage, at recharging stations, or, if weather-proofing is done, in an outside parking area. Additionally, our invention is not just limited to automobiles but instead should have a scope that encompasses any moving device powered by batteries, including but not limited to: golf carts, cars, trucks, motorcycles, tanks, tri-wheeled vehicles, quadrupedal vehicles, and bipedal vehicles. Vehicles which transport people and those which do not transport people also fall within the scope of this invention.
LIDAR (light detection and ranging) is a method of measuring the distance of objects using light. The LIDAR system for this embodiment captures a 2-dimensional array of reflectivity and distance information from its field of view. The key difference between the video camera and a LIDAR system is that the LIDAR system generates the light source itself, whereas a camera usually relies on ambient light from the surroundings (for example sunlight). This allows the device to operate in conditions with no lighting, such as a darkened garage. Like a camera, the LIDAR system produces data that when processed can be used to help determine the position of the vehicle. Another term for LIDAR is LADAR (laser detection and ranging).
The LIDAR system 205 is mounted on the wall such that it can view the entire robotic manipulator 204 and the location of the receptacle 202. The robotic manipulator 204 attaches to the base 207 of the system. The base 207 contains the computing platform. The LIDAR system 205 communicates to the computing platform via a cord 209, though other embodiments could also use a form of wireless RF communication. Lastly, a power cord 208 from the base 207 is plugged into a power outlet on the back wall.
As an additional embodiment, a camera is attached to the end-effector of the robotic manipulator to aid in the accurate positioning of the charging plug relative the receptacle.
As an additional embodiment, the system contains a means of detecting humans in the vicinity. Ensuring the safety of humans in the vicinity of moving robots is clearly very important. While the chance of an accident occurring is small, extra safeguards can be taken to further reduce the chance of injury. The invention is designed to be no more dangerous than any other stationary object located in a garage. With that said, it is important to mention the potential risks such a system would have. Worst-case dangers are: 1) pinching of body parts like fingers if they are placed at a joint of the robotic manipulator, 2) bruises from the manipulator bumping into an individual, 3) eye damage from a manipulator's end-effector bumping into the face of an individual. To eliminate these dangers and as an additional embodiment to the invention, the system contains a means of detecting humans in the vicinity of the charger and taking precautionary action.
Two means of detecting the presence of humans are suggested. Ultrasound sensors emit high-frequency sound waves. Motion can be detected by the reflection of these waves off objects. This technology is commonly employed in burglar systems. These sensors offer an inexpensive and simple solution to detect human motion.
Another way of detecting humans in the vicinity of the charger is to employ a light-sensitive device either in the form of a camera or a LIDAR system. In addition to detecting the relative position of the car to the charger, these or additional light-sensitive devices can be used to detect the presence of humans in the field of view. This method differs from the method employing ultra-sound sensors in that the vision processing algorithms are more intensive but have the potential to be more reliable and offer more options for precautionary action than the simpler ultra-sound sensors.
In fact, specific LIDAR systems, such as the SICK S3000 Safety Laser Scanners, are specifically designed to detect human movement for robotic systems in industrial applications.
If human movement was detected, then appropriate precautionary action can be taken. For example, if the humans were very close to the manipulator while the system was in the process of connecting the charger to the vehicle, the robotic manipulator could freeze. By not moving, the manipulator is not in danger of bumping into a human. If people were detected but they were somewhat distant from the robotic manipulator, then the charger might have enough time to disengage the plug from the receptacle and position the robotic manipulator in a safe resting position.
The system can recharge the vehicle as long as the robotic manipulator is within reach of the charging receptacle. If the driver does not park the vehicle within range of the manipulator, then the system cannot charge the car. As another embodiment of the invention, the system contains a means of helping the driver position the vehicle while parking. This can be done by using a proximity sensor to detect the distance of the car to the charger. The proximity sensor could be in the form of ultrasound, LIDAR, or a camera. As the driver approaches the charging system, the system will alert the driver when the vehicle is sufficiently close to the manipulator. Alerting the driver could be as simple as a flashing light or an audible beep. Once alerted, the driver, knowing the vehicle is in range of the charger, can stop.
Consumer vehicles come with keys to lock and unlock the vehicles. Most vehicles come with keys that have wireless remote unlocking systems which we call the remote key. The remote key uses RF to transmit information to the vehicle to unlock and lock the vehicle. As an additional embodiment of the invention, the system is equipped with a wireless remote system that can communicate with the remote key or with the vehicle itself The method of operation would be as follows: when the user parks the car in the garage and locks the vehicle with the remote key, the charging system receives notification from the vehicle. The notification would indicate that the car is ready to be charged. The charger could then start to charge the car. Similarly, when the driver wants to use the car, he unlocks the car with the remote key. Since the vehicle is unlocked, there is a good chance the vehicle will be used. Therefore, the vehicle notifies the charger via RF communication that charging needs to be terminated and the robotic manipulator needs to disengage the plug from the vehicle.
Once the location of the vehicle is determined, the position of the charging receptacle on the vehicle needs to be determined 3004. There are a few methods the system can employ to identify the location of the charging receptacle 3005. The methods are bulleted below:
Once the receptacle position is known, then the system can proceed to move the plug of the charging cord towards the receptacle 3006. The system plans out the motion of the robotic manipulator using path planning algorithms and kinematic models of the system. Additionally, the torque of the linkages can be monitored for diagnostic purposes. If out-of-the-ordinary behavior occurs (for example, excessive torques or forces, motion that does not correlate with the expected response, objects obstructing the vision), then the system can take precautionary actions.
Once the plug of the charging cord reaches the receptacle, depending on the vehicle, it might be necessary to remove a cap or cover to expose the receptacle 3007. The end-effector of the robotic manipulator can have a specialized hook or gripper system, specifically designed to remove the cap. The vision system provides feedback to precisely control the motion of the grippers, directing them through the proper motions to open the cap.
Once the receptacle cap is removed, the manipulator engages the plug into the receptacle 3008. A proper connection is confirmed by the electronics of the system. The plug may contain additional electrical contacts to verify the integrity of the connection. Alternatively, inductively coupled plug/receptacle pairs can measure the electrical response of an applied signal to verify the connection integrity.
Once the connection is verified, the vehicle's batteries are charged 3009. Whether the charging time lasts a few hours or a few minutes, the system stays connected until the batteries are fully charged or until an external event necessitates the premature removal of the plug.
Once charging is completed, the robotic manipulator disconnects the plug from the receptacle, closes the receptacle cap, and moves to a resting position 3010. The system maintains a resting position until at a later time, it recognizes that a vehicle needs to be charged.
While my above figures and descriptions contain many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an exemplification of some preferred embodiments thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3527268 | Ginsburgh | Sep 1970 | A |
4158802 | Rose, II | Jun 1979 | A |
4289226 | Wilkinson | Sep 1981 | A |
4309644 | Reimers | Jan 1982 | A |
4983903 | Bae | Jan 1991 | A |
5157319 | Klontz | Oct 1992 | A |
5187423 | Marton | Feb 1993 | A |
5202617 | Nor | Apr 1993 | A |
5264776 | Hulsey | Nov 1993 | A |
5272431 | Nee | Dec 1993 | A |
5306999 | Hoffman | Apr 1994 | A |
5323099 | Bruni | Jun 1994 | A |
5327065 | Bruni | Jul 1994 | A |
5341083 | Klontz | Aug 1994 | A |
5404923 | Yamamoto | Apr 1995 | A |
5461298 | Lara et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461299 | Bruni | Oct 1995 | A |
5549443 | Hammerslag | Aug 1996 | A |
5609190 | Anderson | Mar 1997 | A |
5628351 | Ramsey, Jr. | May 1997 | A |
5634503 | Musil | Jun 1997 | A |
5646500 | Wilson | Jul 1997 | A |
5684379 | Svedoff | Nov 1997 | A |
5711648 | Hammerslag | Jan 1998 | A |
5760569 | Chase, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5892346 | Moroto | Apr 1999 | A |
5998963 | Aarseth | Dec 1999 | A |
6024137 | Strnad | Feb 2000 | A |
6094501 | Beatty | Jul 2000 | A |
6157162 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6194854 | Uchibori et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6354343 | Strnad | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371768 | Neblett | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7013205 | Hafner | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7173396 | Gunji | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7248018 | Sanders, Jr. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
5-207602 | Aug 1993 | JP |
6-014408 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2000-092727 | Mar 2000 | JP |