Patent Application
20230266303
The present invention provides a system for the study of tau protein aggregation in neuronal cells in vitro which can be used to screen agents for therapeutic effectiveness against aggregates of tau protein or fragments thereof.
Assembly of tau protein into paired helical filaments (PHFs) and straight filaments as aggregates is a key feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aggregation of tau has been implicated in neurodegeneration, cellular toxicity and the propagation which accompanies disease progression.
The misfolding, self-assembly and accumulation of tau protein in tangles is a major pathological feature shared by tauopathies, the most common of which is Alzheimer's disease (AD). Under pathological conditions, the abnormal aggregation of tau protein into paired helical filaments (PHFs) into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) is accompanied by the loss of function of tau protein and neuronal dysfunction.
Tau has been shown to exhibit prion-like behaviour, including cellular uptake and templated seeding. In vitro studies have shown that extracellular tau aggregates can be internalised by neurons to induce self-assembly of intracellular endogenous tau, which can then be released and transferred to neighbouring or synaptically connected neurons. In cultured cell lines, internalised aggregates of recombinant tau induced using heparin or AD brain-derived tau aggregates can be observed in endosomal compartments and are capable of recruiting endogenous and aggregation-prone tau to aggregate. A consistent finding in these studies is the co-localisation of tau with endosomes and lysosomes.
Whilst there is strong support for transmission of tau aggregates between neurons and/or glial cells, the species responsible for this has been debated. Studies have suggested that the seeding competence of tau is dependent on the size and conformation of the tau aggregate and that tau oligomers act as the key species for inducing propagation rather than monomers or longer fibrils purified from rTg4510 mice. It was reported in one study that large tau aggregates (>10mers) are the seed-competent species in P301S tau transgenic mice, whereas in another study, tau trimers were found to be the minimal unit necessary for conformational template seeding and intracellular tau aggregation in human tau-expressing HEK-293 cells.
Many studies have used animal or cell models in which human and/or mutant tau has been overexpressed. In vitro studies have utilised full-length or truncated tau proteins that require heparin-induced fibrilisation. Both approaches aim to overcome the low aggregation propensity and the lack of cytotoxicity of full-length tau. However, there are increasing doubts as to the physiological relevance of heparin-induced tau filaments as they do not self-assemble and do not reproduce the key structural features of AD filaments. The truncated repeat-domain fragment of tau spanning residues 297-391 (referred to as dGAE (see Despres et al ACS Chem. Biol., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1363-1379, (2019); Zhang et al Elife, vol. 8, p. e43584, (2019); Wischik et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., vol. 85, no. 12, pp. 4506-4510, (1988)) which was first identified biochemically in proteolytically stable PHF core preparations from AD brain tissues, overlaps with the core sequence (306-378) characterised by cryo-electron microscopy as forming C-shaped subunits assembled to form a combined cross-beta/beta-helix structure. It is not understood what initiates the process of tau aggregation in AD, but truncated dGAE serves for template-directed aggregation of tau in cell-free and cellular models (Harrington et al. J. Biol. Chem., vol. 290, no. 17, pp. 10862-10875, 2015), Wischik et al Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, vol. 93, no. 20, pp. 11213-11218 (1996)), and in transgenic mice (Melis et al. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 2199-2222, (2015)). The dGAE region of tau (297-391) assembles spontaneously in physiological conditions to form PHF-like filaments in vitro in the absence of additives such as heparin.
Previous studies investigating the properties of exogenously applied tau in tissue culture cell models have been hampered by the use of non-neuronal or neuronal in vitro models that overexpress human wild-type or mutant tau, often using non-physiological fragments or preparations of tau to initiate aggregation (Falcon et al., J. Biol. Chem., vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 1049-1065, (2015); J. L. Guo and V. M. Y. Lee, J. Biol. Chem., vol. 286, no. 17, pp 15317-15331 (2011); and Kfoury et al., J. Biol. Chem., vol. 287, no. 23, pp. 19440-19451, (2012)).
It has also been reported that full-length tau, mutated tau and tau aggregates with different phosphorylation states have minimal effects on cell viability (Kumar et al., J. Biol. Chem., vol. 289, no. 29, pp. 20318-20332, (2014); Tepper et al., J. Biol. Chem., vol. 289, no. 49, pp. 34389-34407, (2014) and Kaniyappan et al., Alzheimer's Dement., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1270-1291, (2017)). For instance, it was observed that oligomers formed from a variant repeat tau fragment (corresponding to tau244-372 with a Lys-280 deletion; TauRDΔK) are selectively toxic to dendritic spines without affecting cell viability (Kaniyappan et al., Alzheimer's Dement., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1270-1291, (2017)).
Other studies have also shown that toxicity is dependent the precise fragments of tau that are used (Flach et al., J. Biol. Chem., vol. 287, no. 52, pp. 43223-43233, (2012); Lasagna-Reeves et al., Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 47, pp. 10039-10041, (2010); and Lasagna-Reeves et al., Mol. Neurodegener., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 39, (2011)). Variation in tau toxicity assays may be related in part to the differences in tau fragments used and in their methods of preparation.
Identification of Tau aggregation inhibitors is described in WO 1996/030766 and WO 2002/055720. Screening for inhibitors of paired helical filaments of Tau is described in WO 2001/018546. High-throughput screens for use in identification of inhobitors of Tau aggregation have been reviewed in Bulic et al (J. Med. Chem. Vol. 56, pp 4135-4155 (2013)). Liu et al (Pharm. Pat. Anal. Vol. 3 pp 429-447 (2014)) also report on various Tau targeting approaches using several different mechanisms distinct from Tau aggregation inhibitors. Clinical development of compounds identified are discussed in Panza et al (BioMed Research Int., Vol. 216, Article ID 3245935, (2016)). Despite these reports none of the inhibitors other than Methylene Blue (MB) or LMT ((leuco-methylthioninium bis-hydromethanesulfonate, LMTM; also known as LMT-X or TRx0237) described have progressed to full phase III clinical trials (Panza et al (BioMed Research Int., Vol. 216, Article ID 3245935, (2016)).
The novel system described herein permits the molecular mechanisms of propagation of tau aggregation pathology to be studied in vitro in a more physiological manner with a view to development of novel therapeutic approaches. The new model system described herein permits the investigation of the internalisation, cytotoxicity and effect on endogenous tau of the PHF forming region of tau in human neuronal cells in the absence of mutant tau overexpression or exogenous seeding factors.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of screening for an agent effective in inhibiting cytotoxicity of a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto to a neuronal cell comprising the steps of:
The method of the invention is suitably carried out in vitro on a population of neuronal cells. The methods of the invention are therefore ex vivo methods for screening for agents with a desired activity against aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof.
The neuronal cell may be cultured in the presence of the agent and then further cultured in the presence of the fragment of Tau protein. Alternatively, the neuronal cell can be cultured in the present of the fragment of Tau protein and then further cultured in the presence of the agent.
The fragments of Tau protein as defined above suitably aggregate to form self-assembled structures, including oligomers and/or filaments. The fragments of Tau protein may be in a predominantly random coil conformation and/or consist of soluble monomer and dimer forms. The aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof as described herein may be any suitable form of tau protein. Suitably, the tau protein is a recombinant form of tau protein. Such fragments of Tau protein may be also referred to as tau aggregates. The fragments of Tau protein may be present in a purified preparation in which contaminants (shorter peptide fragments) are removed from the preparation.
The fragments of Tau protein as described herein are able to self-aggregate without phosphorylation. The fragments of Tau protein described herein co-aggregate with endogenous Tau protein. After co-aggregation, the fragments of Tau protein described herein and the endogenous Tau protein accumulate together within endosomal and/or lysosomal compartments within a neuronal cell.
The fragments of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto suitably comprises a contiguous sequence of at least 70 amino acids from the amino acid of SEQ ID NO: 4.
The fragments of Tau protein as defined above for use according to the invention may be from 70 to 97 amino acids in length, optionally from 71 to 97 amino acids in length. The fragment of Tau protein as defined above may be suitably selected from the group of fragments of 71, 73, 94, 95, 97 amino acids in length.
The fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto may therefore be selected from the group consisting of fragments of Tau protein having amino acid sequences as described in SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO: 3, SEQ ID NO: 5, SEQ ID NO: 6, or SEQ ID NO: 7, or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto.
dGAE95 refers to the 95 residues fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Ile-297 and C-terminus at residue Glu-391, as described in SEQ ID NO: 4, or at homologous positions in other species (the residues mentioned referring to the human or mouse Tau sequence, which are identical in this region).
The fragments of Tau protein used according to the invention therefore also include the fragments dGAE97 (dGAE97 refers to the 97 residues fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Asp-295 and C-terminus at residue Glu-391, as described in SEQ ID NO: 3, or at homologous positions in other species), dGA (“dGA” refers to the 94 residues fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Ile-297 and C-terminus at residue Ala-390, as described in SEQ ID NO: 5, or at homologous positions in other species), dGAE73 (dGAE73 refers to the fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Val-306 and C-terminus at residue Phe-378, as described in SEQ ID NO: 6, or at homologous positions in other species), and the amino acid sequence of residues 308 to 378 of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Ile-308 and C-terminus at residue Phe-378, as described in SEQ ID NO: 7, or at homologous positions in other species.
All residue numbers of the Tau protein sequence and structure in the present disclosure refer to the residues of SEQ ID NO:1, which is the sequence of the four-repeat isoform 2N4R of human Tau protein (Uniprot ID P10636-8), or homologous positions in other species or variants thereof. Human Tau isoform 2N4R (Uniprot ID P10636-8) corresponds to amino acids 1-124, 376-394 and 461-758 of full-length Tau, Uniprot ID P10636 or P10636-1, provided as SEQ ID NO:2. SEQ ID NO: 2 relates to a longer form of Tau found in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) but not the central nervous system (CNS). As used herein, references to “full-length” tau refer to SEQ ID NO: 1 (the relevant sequence for the CNS) and not to SEQ ID NO: 2 (which is not relevant in the CNS).
sapiens OX = 9606 GN = MAPT
dGAE97 refers to the 97 residues fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Asp-295 and C-terminus at residue Glu-391, as described in SEQ ID NO: 3, or at homologous positions in other species (the residues mentioned referring to the human or mouse Tau sequence, which are identical in this region). As will be apparent to the skilled person, dGAE97 also corresponds to the fragment of Isoform PNS-Tau (P10636-1) with N-ter at Asp-612 and C-ter at Glu-708.
dGAE95 refers to the 95 residues fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Ile-297 and C-terminus at residue Glu-391, as described in SEQ ID NO: 4, or at homologous positions in other species (the residues mentioned referring to the human or mouse Tau sequence, which are identical in this region). As will be apparent to the skilled person, dGAE95 also corresponds to the fragment of Isoform PNS-Tau (P10636-1) with N-ter at Ile-614 and C-ter at Glu-708. This sequence may sometimes be referred to simply as “dGAE”. Residues 297 to 391 of Tau (2N4R) are also known as the predominant fragment isolated from proteolytically stable core of the paired helical filament (PHF).
The dGAE region of tau (297-391) assembles spontaneously in physiological conditions to form PHF-like filaments in vitro in the absence of additives such as heparin.
“dGA” refers to the 94 residues fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Ile-297 and C-terminus at residue Ala-390, as described in SEQ ID NO: 5, or at homologous positions in other species (the residues mentioned referring to the human or mouse Tau sequence, which are identical in this region).
dGAE73 refers to the fragment of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Val-306 and C-terminus at residue Phe-378, as described in SEQ ID NO: 6, or at homologous positions in other species (the residues mentioned referring to the human or mouse Tau sequence, which are identical in this region). This fragment corresponds to residues 306-378 of the sequence identified by cryo-EM as being the core of PHFs isolated from AD brain tissue (Fitzpatrick et al, 2017; Nature). The core can extend beyond these residues but is limited by the resolution of the cryo-EM. As will be apparent to the skilled person, dGAE73 also corresponds to the fragment of Isoform PNS-Tau (P10636-1) with N-ter at Val-623 and C-ter at Phe-695.
A further fragment of the PHF core is residues 308 to 378 of Tau (2N4R) with N-terminus at residue Ile-308 and C-terminus at residue Phe-378, as described in SEQ ID NO: 7, or at homologous positions in other species (the residues mentioned referring to the human or mouse Tau sequence, which are identical in this region).
One preferred form of the tau protein is the dGAE fragment of tau protein, corresponding to amino acid residues 297-391 (using numbering from 2N4R tau), suitably the recombinant form thereof, according to SEQ ID NO: 4. Following purification, dGAE exists in a predominantly random coil conformation and consists mainly of soluble monomer and dimer forms of dGAE.
The fragments of Tau which may be used in accordance with a method of the present invention are fragments comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto. Optionally, the sequence may have 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98% or 99% identity thereto.
Such sequences are therefore defined as having a certain percentage sequence identity to one or more sequences (with reference to SEQ ID NOs) as described herein. Sequence identity may be assessed by any convenient method. However, for determining the degree of sequence identity between sequences, computer programmes that make pairwise or multiple alignments of sequences are useful, for instance EMBOSS Needle or EMBOSS stretcher (both Rice, P. et al., Trends Genet., 16, (6) pp 276-277, 2000) may be used for pairwise sequence alignments while Clustal Omega (Sievers F et al., Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:539, 2011) or MUSCLE (Edgar, R. C., Nucleic Acids Res. 32(5):1792-1797, 2004) may be used for multiple sequence alignments, though any other appropriate programme may be used. Whether the alignment is pairwise or multiple, it must be performed globally (i.e. across the entirety of the reference sequence) rather than locally.
Sequence alignments and percentage (%) identity calculations may be determined using for instance standard Clustal Omega parameters: matrix Gonnet, gap opening penalty 6, gap extension penalty 1. Alternatively, the standard EMBOSS Needle parameters may be used: matrix BLOSUM62, gap opening penalty 10, gap extension penalty 0.5. Any other suitable parameters may alternatively be used.
For the purposes of this application, where there is dispute between sequence identity values obtained by different methods, the value obtained by global pairwise alignment using EMBOSS Needle with default parameters shall be considered valid.
For use in the method of the invention, the aggregates of tau protein or a fragment of Tau protein (aggregates of tau protein) may suitably be diluted in a physiological buffer solution, e.g. a phosphate buffer (physiological pH, suitably pH 7.4, for example a phosphate buffered solution) and incubated at physiological temperature (suitably at 37° C.) suitably with agitation prior to administration to the neuronal cell. Suitable forms of phosphate buffered solution can comprise aqueous solutions of disodium hydrogen phosphate and sodium chloride, or potassium chloride and potassium dihydrogen phosphate. The agitation may be from 500 rpm to 1000 rpm, for example 700 rpm. The agitation may be for 24 hours to 96 hours, for example 24, hours, 36, hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72 hours, or 96 hours.
In one example, therefore a suitable preparation of the aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof for use in a method of the invention may be prepared by diluting 100 μM protein in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and incubated at 37° C. suitably with agitation, for example agitating with a speed of 700 rpm for up to 72 hours prior to administration to the neuronal cell.
The neuronal cell may suitably express the endogenous form of Tau protein. For example, the cell line SH-SY5Y expresses endogenous human Tau protein. The neuronal cell is therefore not transfected to express a Tau protein.
The neuronal cell may be from a neuronal cell line, for example a neuroblastoma cell line, e.g. the cell line SH-SY5Y. The cells may be undifferentiated and then subsequently differentiated in culture in the presence of an appropriate growth factor, for example retinoic acid. The methods of the invention may therefore use an undifferentiated neuronal cell, for example undifferentiated SH-SY5Y. Suitably, the neuronal cell is a differentiated neuronal cell, for example differentiated SH-SY5Y (dSH-SY5Y). Where the cells are an undifferentiated cell type, the methods of the invention may therefore include an initial pre-step in which the undifferentiated cells are differentiated in culture in the presence of a growth factor. The growth factor may be retinoic acid.
Suitably, the cells of the neuronal cell line may be provided in a culture medium, for example a low-serum or serum-free culture medium e.g. DMEM growth medium; or phosphate buffered saline solution, optionally supplemented with differentiation factors and/or growth factors. The neuronal cells may be cultured in such media according to the present invention.
Undifferentiated SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells may be cultured in any generally suitable growth medium, for example Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) supplemented with 10% Foetal Calf Serum (FCS), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) and 1% L-glutamine. For differentiation, SH-SY5Y cells can be plated at a density of for example 25,000 to 30,000 cm2, optionally 50,000 cells per well in 24-well plates or 300,000 cells per well in 6-well plates. On the first day of differentiation, media may be suitably replaced with low-serum culture media (DMEM/F-12 containing 1% Foetal Calf Serum (FCS), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) and 1% L-glutamine) containing 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid (RA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and cells may be incubated for 48 hours. On day 3, this process can be repeated with fresh RA and cells incubated for a further 48 hours. On day 5, the cells can be washed once in serum-free culture media to remove traces of serum. Serum-free culture media (DMEM/F-12 containing 1% P/S and 1% L-glutamine) containing 50 ng/ml brain-derived neurotrophic factor (STEMCELL Technologies) may be added to the cells and incubated for 48 hours. Differentiated cells (dSH-SY5Y) are suitably ready to use for experiments on day 7.
Incubation of the neuronal cell with the agent may be for up to 12 hours to 72 hours, for example for 12 hours, 16 hours, 20 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, or 72 hours.
The aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof may be administered to the cells (plated at a density of 50,000-300,000 per well in 24-well or 6 well plates respectively) or 25,000-30,000/cm2 at a concentration of from 0.01 μM to 100 μM, for example at 1 μM, 5 μM, or 10 μM.
Suitably the culturing of the neuronal cell with the agent is conducted for sufficient time in order to allow the agent to be internalised by the neuronal cell, such as for example from 1-24 hours, 1 to 36 hours or 1 to 48 hours.
The administration of the aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof to the neuronal step is carried out under conditions to allow for the aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof to be internalised by the neuronal cell, such as for example from 24 to 48 hours.
Cytotoxicity with respect to the neuronal cells used in accordance with the present invention can be defined as percentage survival of cells in a culture, including the measurement of the relative oxidative stress, endogenous recruitment of tau, lysosome/mitochondrial damage in the neuronal cells, etc.
A reduction in toxicity may be determined by cell viability, cell morphology, or the cytoskeletal distribution of Tau protein in a neuronal cell.
As described herein, the agent being screened can be added to the neuronal cell at a different time point relative to the administration of the fragment of Tau protein to the neuronal cell, i.e. before administration of the fragment of Tau protein, or after the administration of the fragment of Tau protein.
The methods of the invention can therefore be used to assess whether an agent being tested is able to prevent or reduce the cytotoxicity of the fragment of Tau protein as defined above. A reduction in the cytotoxicity of the fragment of Tau protein may be shown in the reduction in the percentage of cell death in a culture of neuronal cells cultured with a fragment of Tau protein as defined above in the presence of an agent compared to the percentage of cell death in a culture of neuronal cells cultured with a fragment of Tau protein as defined above in the absence of the agent.
Suitably, the determination of the inhibition of cytotoxicity in step (c) can include a comparison with a control value for the neuronal cell when the neuronal cell is incubated with aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof in the absence of the agent being tested. The determination of cytotoxicity can be expressed as a percentage of control-treated cells (neuronal cells incubated with a fragment of Tau protein as defined above in the absence of the agent). A reference level for the toxicity of the fragment of Tau protein as defined above can also be established with reference to buffer-treated cells which will provide the level of absolute toxicity for the concentration of the fragment of Tau protein as defined above used in any given assay.
A suitable method to establish whether the result of an assay showed that an agent was able to prevent or reduce cytotoxicity would be by means of a statistical test, i.e. a statistical test to examine significance of differences (e.g. unpaired T test). The reduction may therefore be a statistically significant reduction in cytotoxicity. For example, a cytotoxic fragment of Tau protein may result in 40%-60% cell death in a culture of neuronal cells compared to a control value of 20% cell death for a neuronal cell culture in a control culture medium, for example a low-serum or serum-free culture medium e.g. DMEM growth medium; or phosphate buffered saline solution.
The assay for cytotoxicity according to a method of the invention may be suitably normalised to the results obtained for cells treated without agent or with treatment vehicle. Compounds exhibiting 50% inhibition with agent at a suitable concentration of about 2 μM or less may be considered as active inhibitors of cytotoxicity. The relative activity can also therefore be compared for different agents also according to a method of the invention as described herein.
The cytotoxicity of any substance can be assayed by means of a cell viability assay. The cell viability assay may be undertaken using any generally suitable method, such as for example (i) a fluorometric assay; (ii) a colorimetric assay; (iii) a luminometric assay; or (iv) a dye exclusion assay.
Fluorometric assays for cytotoxicity include: ReadyProbes® Cell Viability Imaging Kit (Life Technologies), resazurin, alamarBlue assay or CFDA-AM assay. Colorimetric assays for cytotoxicity include: MTT assay, MTS assay, XTT assay, WST-1 assay, WST-8 assay, LDH assay, SRB assay, NRU assay or crystal violet assay. Luminometric assays for cytotoxicity include: ATP assay or real-time viability assay. Dye exclusion assays for cytotoxicity include: TUNEL, Caspase-3, Trypan blue, eosin, Congo red, erythrosine B assays.
Fluorometric assays of cell viability and cytotoxicity are easy to perform with the use of a fluorescence microscope, fluorometer, fluorescence microplate reader or flow cytometer, and they offer many advantages over traditional dye exclusion and colorimetric assays. Fluorometric assays are also applicable for adherent or suspended cell lines and easy to use. A fluorometric assay may therefore be preferred in assessing the effect of an agent of interest on the cytotoxicity of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof on neuronal cells according to a method of the invention.
One such approach using a fluorometric approach may suitably use a differential fluorescence approach. Following the addition of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof to a population of neuronal cells, e.g. dGAE, cell viability may be measured using ReadyProbes® Cell Viability Imaging Kit (Life Technologies). The kit contains a NucBlue® reagent which can be used to label all cells (blue) and a NucGreen® reagent to label dead cells only (green). For tagged aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof, e.g. dGAE, NucRed® reagent can be used to label dead cells (red).
Neuronal cells may suitably be incubated with the reagents at 37° C. for 15 minutes. DAPI fluorescence may be captured using a G 365 excitation filter and a LP 420 emission filter with a FT 395 dichroic. Green fluorescence may be captured using a FITC filter set (BP 450-490 excitation filter, BP 515-565 emission filter and FT 510 dichroic).
The proportion of buffer-treated cell death may be quantified by converting the images to grayscale followed by manually adjusting the threshold and converting it into a binary image to highlight live DAPI-stained cells. The number of cells may be automatically counted. The dead cells may be counted in the same way and cell death can expressed as a percentage of buffer-treated cells.
Fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) may also be used for bulk measurements of fluorescence intensity. A quantification of internalised unlabelled fragments of Tau protein can be determined using immunofluorescence. Alternatively, unlabelled fragments of Tau protein can be measured using thioflavin S (ThS) staining or similar.
A colorimetric assay measures a biochemical marker to evaluate metabolic activity of a cell. Reagents used in colorimetric assays develop a colour in response to the viability of cells, allowing the colorimetric measurement of cell viability via spectrophotometer. Colorimetric assays are applicable for adherent or suspended cell lines.
Luminometric assays provide fast and simple determination of cell proliferation and cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. These assays can be performed in a convenient 96-well and 384-well microtiter plate format and detection by luminometric microplate reader.
The simplest and widely method for assessing cytotoxicity is the dye exclusion method. In a dye exclusion method, viable cells exclude dyes, but dead cells not exclude them. A variety of such dyes may be used, including eosin, Congo red, erythrosine B, and trypan blue.
The system of the invention can be used to assess the effectiveness of an agent of interest in altering the effect of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof on a neuronal cell. The agent may be any pharmaceutically active molecule or substance, including compounds or biological molecules, suitably a specific binding molecule, such as antibodies (for example, polyclonal antibodies or monoclonal antibodies, including bispecific antibodies, or antibody fragments such as Fab, F(ab′)2, Fc, Fd, Fv, dAb, scFv, CDR fragment, diabody, or variants or derivatives thereof). The agent may be administered directly or formulated in a suitable adjuvant, diluent or solution (e.g. a suitable physiologically buffered solution, such as phosphate buffered saline), or formulated as a pharmaceutical formulation using standard techniques know in the art.
The methods of the invention may comprise a step of establishing the activity of an agent as a positive control with known activity. Examples of known test compounds with established inhibitory activity against fragments of Tau protein for use as a positive control may include, but are not limited to, Methylene Blue (MB; also known as methylthioninium chloride) or LMT (leuco-methylthioninium bis-hydromethanesulfonate, LMTM; also known as LMT-X or TRx0237). The activity of an agent assayed according to a method of the invention can be compared to the positive control.
The methods of the invention may comprise a step of establishing a baseline for no activity of an agent using a negative control (with no known activity). Examples of suitable negative controls may include culture medium for the neuronal cells, phosphate buffered saline solution, or similar. The activity of an agent assayed according to a method of the invention can be compared to the negative control.
Optionally, the method of the invention may additionally comprise the step of treating a subject with a tauopathy with the said agent, further optionally including another therapeutically active substance suitable for the treatment of a tauopathy.
The present invention therefore provides a system for study of the effects of agents on the behaviour of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof which can be used to assess the effectiveness of the agent in the treatment of a tauopathy or disease characterised by abnormal accumulation of tau proteins in neuronal cells of a subject.
Aggregation of the tau protein is a hallmark of diseases referred to as “tauopathies”. Various tauopathy disorders that have been recognized which feature prominent tau pathology in neurons and/or glia and this term has been used in the art for several years. The similarities between these pathological inclusions and the characteristic tau inclusions in diseases such as AD indicate that the structural features are shared and that it is the topographic distribution of the pathology that is responsible for the different clinical phenotypes observed. In particular, cryo-electron microscope structures of aggregated Tau in AD, Pick's disease (a subtype of Frontotemporal Dementia), chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and cortico-basal degeneration (CBD) have been previously obtained, and all show common conformational features, indicating that compounds that have the ability to modulate Tau aggregation in e.g. PHFs (as observed in AD), may also modulate aggregation of Tau in other tauopathies. In addition to specific diseases discussed below, those skilled in the art can identify tauopathies by combinations of cognitive or behavioural symptoms, plus additionally through the use of appropriate ligands for aggregated tau as visualised using PET or MRI, such as those described in WO 02/075318.
As well as Alzheimer's disease (AD), the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders such as Pick's disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) appears to correlate with an accumulation of pathological truncated tau aggregates in the dentate gyrus and stellate pyramidal cells of the neocortex, respectively. Relevant tauopathies (or tau-associated dementias) include fronto-temporal dementia (FTD); parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17); disinhibition-dementia-parkinsonism-amyotrophy complex (DDPAC); pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND); Guam-ALS syndrome; pallido-nigro-luysian degeneration (PNLD); cortico-basal degeneration (CBD); Dementia with Argyrophilic grains (AgD); Dementia pugilistica (DP) wherein despite different topography, NFTs are similar to those observed in AD (Bouras et al., 1992); Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a tauopathy including DP as well as repeated and sports-related concussion (McKee, et al., 2009). Others are discussed in Wischik et al. 2000, for detailed discussion—especially Table 5.1).
Abnormal tau in NFTs is found also in Down's Syndrome (DS) (Flament et al., 1990), and in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (Harrington et al., 1994). Tau-positive NFTs are also found in Postencephalitic parkinsonism (PEP) (Charpiot et al., 1992). Glial tau tangles are observed in Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) (Ikeda et al., 1995). Other tauopathies include Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC) (Love et al., 1995); Sanfilippo syndrome type B (or mucopolysaccharidosis III B, MPS III B) (Ohmi, et al., 2009); myotonic dystrophies (DM), DM1 (Sergeant, et al., 2001 and references cited therein) and DM2 (Maurage et al., 2005). Additionally, there is a growing consensus in the literature that a tau pathology may also contribute more generally to cognitive deficits and decline, including in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (see e.g. Braak, et al., 2003, Wischik et al., 2018).
All of these diseases, which are characterized primarily or partially by abnormal tau aggregation, are referred to herein as “tauopathies” or “diseases of tau protein aggregation”. In aspects of the present invention relating to tauopathies, the tauopathy may be selected from any tauopathy defined herein.
The tauopathy may be selected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, Primary age-related tauopathy (PART), Neurofibrillary tangle-predominant senile dementia, Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Corticobasal degeneration (CBD), Frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17), Pick disease, disinhibition-dementia-parkinsonism-amyotrophy complex (DDPAC), pallido-ponto-nigral degeneration (PPND), Guam-ALS syndrome; pallido-nigro-luysian degeneration (PNLD), Dementia with Argyrophilic grains (AgD), Down's Syndrome (DS), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Postencephalitic parkinsonism (PEP), Dementia pugilistica (DP), traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, ischemia, Lytico-bodig disease (Parkinson-dementia complex of Guam), Ganglioglioma, Gangliocytoma, Meningioangiomatosis, Postencephalitic parkinsonism, Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), Lead encephalopathy, tuberous sclerosis, Pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration, lipofuscinosis and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
The tauopathy may be Alzheimer's disease.
The invention also embraces treatment as a prophylactic measure. The treatment may be prophylactic treatment. The treatment may be by active immunization or passive immunization.
Active tau immunization has been shown to reduce tau pathology by targeting single or multiple phospho-epitopes, the amino terminus, full-length normal and mutant tau or aggregated tau. Reductions in pathological tau are achieved with few reported adverse effects, and the long-lasting immune response makes active immunization a promising option. However, elicitation of antibodies against a native protein always carries the risk of adverse immune reactions and detrimental targeting of the normal protein.
Passive immunization offers a potential solution to the safety concerns that arise from active strategies. Patients will not develop their own antibodies, and the effects of immunization are likely to be transient, which reduces the risk of immunological adverse effects. Passive immunization also offers greater specificity for the epitope that is being targeted. Antibodies could also modify disease progression by blocking the spread of tau pathology.
The agents identified by a method of the present invention with therapeutic effectiveness against a tauopathy or disease characterised by abnormal accumulation of tau proteins in neuronal cells of a subject may therefore be for use in treatment of an early stage tauopathy and/or a tauopathy characterised by mild symptoms. The agent may be for use in treatment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
The agent may be for use in treatment of a tauopathy in a subject at risk of developing a tauopathy. The subject at risk of developing a tauopathy may be identified by any suitable means, such as one or more of medical history, physical examination, neurological examination, brain imaging, mental status tests (such as the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and the Mini-Cog test), computerised cognitive tests (such as the Cantab Mobile, Cognigram, Cognivue, Cognision and Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) devices), mood assessment and genetic testing.
The skilled person is aware that a tauopathy diagnosis may not always be definitive until post-mortem. Accordingly, the agent may be for use in treatment of a tauopathy in a subject at risk of developing a tauopathy. The subject may be suspected of having a tauopathy. The subject may have one or more symptoms of a tauopathy. The agent may be for use in slowing progression of a tauopathy or suspected tauopathy.
The term “therapeutically-effective amount,” where used herein, pertains to that amount of an agent used in the practice of the combination methodologies of the invention which is effective for producing some desired therapeutic effect, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio, when administered in accordance with a desired treatment regimen.
As explained above the invention also embraces treatment as a prophylactic measure. For example, the invention provides a method of prophylactic treatment of a tauopathy in a subject, which method comprises administering to said subject an agent identified by a method of the invention.
The term “prophylactically effective amount,” where used herein, pertains to that amount of an agent identified by a method of the invention which is effective for producing some desired prophylactic effect, commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio, when administered in accordance with a desired treatment regimen. “Prophylaxis” in the context of the present specification should not be understood to circumscribe complete success i.e. complete protection or complete prevention. Rather prophylaxis in the present context refers to a measure which is administered in advance of detection of a symptomatic condition with the aim of preserving health by helping to delay, mitigate or avoid that particular condition.
Preferred features of the second and subsequent aspects of the invention are as for the first aspect mutatis mutandis.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of screening for an agent effective in inhibiting internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto comprising the steps of:
As described herein, internalisation of the fragment of Tau protein as defined above results in production of insoluble tau species (i.e. aggregates), abnormal phosphorylation and truncation of endogenous full-length tau protein.
Inhibition of internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein as described herein may be assayed using immunofluorescence and/or transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Such techniques can show the relative amounts of the fragment of Tau protein internalised by the neuronal cells in the presence of an active agent. Suitable positive and negative controls can be prepared also as described herein in order to establish known level of activity for an agent with known inhibitory activity and baseline activity in the absence of agent, respectively.
In a method using immunofluorescence, the fragments of Tau protein as described herein may be labelled with a detectable fluorescent label. The method can use a single (primary) antibody, linked to a suitable fluorophore wherein the antibody specifically recognizes and binds to a fragment of Tau protein as described herein. Alternatively, the method can use two antibodies, in which an unlabelled first (primary) antibody specifically recognizes and binds to a fragment of Tau protein as described herein, and a secondary antibody labelled with a fluorophore recognise and binds the primary antibody.
Immunogold transmission electron microscopy (TEM) uses colloidal gold particles which may be attached to antibodies which specifically recognise and bind a fragment of Tau protein as defined herein. The colloidal gold particles may be attached to a primary antibody which specifically recognised and binds to a fragment of Tau protein as defined herein, or the colloidal gold particles may be attached to secondary antibody which specifically recognises and binds to a primary antibody which specifically recognises and binds to a fragment of Tau protein as described herein.
Internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein as described herein may also be assayed using a detectably labelled fragment of Tau protein, for example a fluorescently labelled fragment of Tau protein.
The step of determining the inhibition of internalisation of the fragment of Tau protein in the neuronal cell may therefore use photography or TEM in order to visualise the relative amount of Tau protein fragment internalised in the neuronal cells.
Immunofluorescence and immunogold transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of treated cells as described herein reveal that the fragment of Tau protein as defined above, e.g. for example dGAE, accumulates within the endosomal/lysosomal compartments of cells.
Following incubation, the neuronal cells can be imaged and analysis performed using a suitable analysis program, such as for example “ImageJ”, to quantify the fluorescence intensity within the cell body to provide a readout of internalisation and statistical analysis carried out to compare fluorescence intensity of positive and negative controls with agent treated samples. The number of cells can be counted to express the level of internalisation as mean fluorescence intensity/cell to take into account different numbers of cells in fields of view.
A suitable method to establish whether the result of an assay showed that an agent was able to inhibit internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein may be undertaken by means of a statistical test, i.e. a statistical test to examine significance of differences (e.g. unpaired T test). The reduction may therefore be a statistically significant reduction in internalisation. For example, a fragment of Tau protein able to serve as an inhibitor of internalisation may result in 40%-60% inhibition of internalisation of the fragment of Tau protein in a culture of neuronal cells compared to a control value of 20% inhibition for a neuronal cell culture in a control culture medium, e.g. DMEM growth medium.
The assay for inhibition of internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein according to a method of the invention may be suitably normalised to the results obtained for cells treated without agent or with treatment vehicle. Compounds exhibiting 50% inhibition with agent at a suitable concentration of about 2 μM or less may be considered as active inhibitors of internalisation. The relative activity can also therefore be compared for different agents also according to a method of the invention as described herein.
The methods of the invention may comprise a step of establishing the activity of an agent as a positive control with known activity. Examples of known test compounds with established inhibitory activity against fragments of Tau protein for use as a positive control may include, but are not limited to, Methylene Blue (MB also known as methylthioninium chloride) or LMT (leuco-methylthioninium bis-hydromethanesulfonate, LMTM; also known as LMT-X or TRx0237). The activity of an agent assayed according to a method of the invention can be compared to the positive control.
The methods of the invention may comprise a step of establishing a baseline for no activity of an agent using a negative control (with no known activity). Examples of suitable negative controls may include culture medium for the neuronal cells, phosphate buffered saline solution, or similar. The activity of an agent assayed according to a method of the invention can be compared to the negative control.
Optionally, the method of the invention may additionally comprise the step of treating a subject with a tauopathy with the said agent, further optionally including another therapeutically active substance suitable for the treatment of a tauopathy.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of screening for an agent effective in disrupting interaction of a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto with endogenous tau protein comprising the steps of:
The disruption of the interaction between the fragment of Tau protein and the endogenous Tau protein may be suitably assayed using immunofluorescence and/or immunogold transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as described herein.
As described herein, internalisation of the fragment of Tau protein as defined above results in production of insoluble tau species, abnormal phosphorylation and truncation of endogenous full-length tau protein.
Immunofluorescence and immunogold TEM of treated cells reveal that the aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof, e.g. for example dGAE, accumulates within the endosomal/lysosomal compartments of cells. Disruption of the interaction of a fragment of Tau protein with endogenous Tau protein may be described as inhibition of the interaction between the fragment of Tau protein and the endogenous Tau protein.
The step of determining the disruption of the interaction between the fragment of Tau protein and the endogenous Tau protein in the neuronal cell may therefore use photography or TEM in order to visualise the relative interaction of Tau protein fragment and endogenous Tau protein in the neuronal cells.
As described herein, immunofluorescence and/or immunogold TEM can be used to show the relative disruption of the interaction between a fragment of Tau protein and endogenous Tau protein internalised by the neuronal cells in the presence of an active agent. Suitable positive and negative controls can be prepared also as described herein in order to establish known level of activity for an agent with known inhibitory activity and baseline activity in the absence of agent, respectively.
A suitable method to establish whether the result of an assay showed that an agent was able to disrupt interaction of a fragment of Tau protein with endogenous Tau protein may be undertaken by means of a statistical test, i.e. a statistical test to examine significance of differences (e.g. unpaired T test). The reduction may therefore be a statistically significant reduction in disruption of the interaction of a fragment of Tau with endogenous Tau protein. For example, a fragment of Tau protein able to serve as a disruption of interaction may result in 40%-60% disruption of the interaction of the fragment of Tau protein with endogenous Tau protein in a culture of neuronal cells compared to a control value of 20% inhibition for a neuronal cell culture in a control culture medium, e.g. DMEM growth medium.
The assay for disruption of interaction of a fragment of Tau protein with endogenous Tau protein according to a method of the invention may be suitably normalised to the results obtained for cells treated without agent or with treatment vehicle. Compounds exhibiting 50% activity with agent at a suitable concentration of about 2 μM or less may be considered as being active inhibitors of the interaction. The relative activity can also therefore be compared for different agents also according to a method of the invention as described herein.
The methods of the invention may comprise a step of establishing the activity of an agent as a positive control with known activity. Examples of known test compounds with established inhibitory activity against fragments of Tau protein for use as a positive control may include, but are not limited to, Methylene Blue (MB also known as methylthioninium chloride) or LMT (leuco-methylthioninium bis-hydromethanesulfonate, LMTM; also known as LMT-X or TRx0237). The activity of an agent assayed according to a method of the invention can be compared to the positive control.
The methods of the invention may comprise a step of establishing a baseline for no activity of an agent using a negative control (with no known activity). Examples of suitable negative controls may include culture medium for the neuronal cells, phosphate buffered saline solution, or similar. The activity of an agent assayed according to a method of the invention can be compared to the negative control.
Optionally, the method of the invention may additionally comprise the step of treating a subject with a tauopathy with the said agent, further optionally including another therapeutically active substance suitable for the treatment of a tauopathy.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for screening for an agent effective in inhibiting cytotoxicity of a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto comprising (i) a neuronal cell line. (ii) a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto; and (iii) a library of agents; wherein the neuronal cell line is free from heparin.
The library of agents may comprise any agent of interest as described herein which can alter the effect of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof as described herein on a neuronal cell. The agent may be any pharmaceutically active molecule or substance, including compounds or biological molecules, suitably a specific binding molecule, such as antibodies. The library may be a library of chemical compounds or a library of specific binding molecules.
Such a system of the invention may be provided in the form of a kit of parts comprising a population of cells of a neuronal cell line; a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto; and a library of agents; wherein the neuronal cell line is free from heparin. Such a system or kit of parts of the invention may also be provided with instructions for use. The cells may be provided in a suitable growth or culture medium as described herein. The cells may be provided in a suitable container also,
Other preferred features of the fourth and subsequent aspects of the invention relating to systems of the invention are as described above.
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for screening for an agent effective in inhibiting internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto comprising (i) a neuronal cell line. (ii) a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto; and (iii) a library of agents; wherein the neuronal cell line is free from heparin.
The library of agents may comprise any agent of interest as described herein which can alter the effect of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof as described herein on a neuronal cell. The agent may be any pharmaceutically active molecule or substance, including compounds or biological molecules, suitably a specific binding molecule, such as antibodies. The library may be a library of chemical compounds or a library of specific binding molecules.
Such a system of the invention may be provided in the form of a kit of parts comprising a neuronal cell line; a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto; and a library of agents; wherein the neuronal cell line is free from heparin.
According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for screening for an agent effective in disrupting interaction of a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto with endogenous tau protein comprising (i) a neuronal cell line. (ii) a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto; and (iii) a library of agents; wherein the neuronal cell line is free from heparin.
The library of agents may comprise any agent of interest as described herein which can alter the effect of aggregates of tau protein or a fragment thereof as described herein on a neuronal cell. The agent may be any pharmaceutically active molecule or substance, including compounds or biological molecules, suitably a specific binding molecule, such as antibodies. The library may be a library of chemical compounds or a library of specific binding molecules.
Such a system of the invention may be provided in the form of a kit of parts comprising a neuronal cell line; a fragment of Tau protein comprising at least 70 amino acids in the amino acid sequence of dGAE95 (SEQ ID NO:4) or a sequence with at least 85% identity thereto; and a library of agents; wherein the neuronal cell line is free from heparin.
The present disclosure describes how the cellular uptake of soluble and fragments of Tau protein as defined herein, i.e. aggregated forms of the tau protein, for example the tau protein fragment dGAE, can be explored. The downstream consequences of tau internalisation into differentiated SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells can be examined using fluorescence and electron microscopy alongside structural and biochemical analyses.
In an embodiment of a method or system of any aspect of the invention, undifferentiated neuronal cells may be plated in a multi-well plate at a suitable concentration (for example, 30,000 cells per well) and either differentiated using retinoic acid in depleted serum medium, as described previously, or left undifferentiated. Cells can be then treated in one of the following ways:
The cells may be incubated for 12, 24, or 48 hours at each stage. For example, the cells may be incubated for 24 hours meaning the total time for (1) is 48 hours and 24 hours for (2). For example, as described herein, the tau protein fragment dGAE-488 (for example used at a concentration of 1 μM) can be incubated with cells for 24 hours which is sufficient for internalised tau protein to be seen.
Following incubation, cells may be photographed and analysis of images performed using a suitable analysis software program (for example ImageJ) to quantify the fluorescence intensity within the cell body. The quantification of fluorescence intensity can provide a measure of tau protein internalisation.
The number of cells may be counted to express the level of internalisation as mean fluorescence intensity/cell to take into account different numbers of cells in fields of view.
In one embodiment, a fragment of Tau protein, for example dGAE-488, can be added at a suitable concentration, for example about 1 μM. Agents for screening can be tested initially at a single concentration, for example 10 μM; those agents showing inhibitory activity may then be tested over at a range of concentrations, e.g. for example of from about 2 μM down to about 20 nM and the activity of compounds reported as the concentration at which, for example, 50% inhibition of activity is observed.
The activities measured according to a method or system of the invention may include, as described herein: (i) internalisation of tau (for example as measured by intracellular fluorescence of a detectably labelled fragment of Tau protein as described herein); (ii) intracellular aggregation of a detectably labelled fragment of Tau protein as described herein (for example as measured by harvesting cells, lysing them and separating aggregated labelled fragments of Tau protein by ultracentrifugation and measuring aggregated tau (for example by immunoblot with anti-tau antibody); and (iii) cytotoxicity of a fragment of Tau protein as described herein (for example as measured using a suitable cytotoxicity assay (for example the ReadyProbes® assay) in order to measure cell death (see for example
The activities may be normalised to the results obtained for cells treated without agent or with treatment vehicle. Suitably, compounds exhibiting 50% inhibition with an agent tested at 2 μM or less being considered active. The methods and systems described herein also permit relative activity to be compared for different agents.
The results of the studies described herein show that assembled dGAE exhibits more acute cytotoxicity than the soluble, non-aggregated form. Conversely, the soluble form is much more readily internalised and, once within the cell, is able to associate with endogenous tau resulting in increased phosphorylation and aggregation of endogenous tau, which accumulates in lysosomal/endosomal compartments of the cell. It appears that soluble oligomeric forms are able to propagate tau pathology without being acutely toxic. The studies described herein therefore provide methods and systems for determining the activity of agents in inhibiting the activity of a fragment of Tau protein as measured by cytotoxicity of a fragment of Tau protein as described herein, internalisation of a fragment of Tau protein as described herein and/or the interaction of endogenous Tau protein with a fragment of Tau protein as described herein.
The results presented herein show that aggregated dGAE is cytotoxic while the soluble, non-fibrillar dGAE is not acutely toxic and is taken up by neuron-like cells. Internalisation results in production of insoluble tau species, abnormal phosphorylation and truncation of endogenous full-length tau. Immunofluorescence and immunogold TEM of treated cells reveal that dGAE accumulates within the endosomal/lysosomal compartments of cells. The downstream consequences of internalisation of Tau fragments are therefore cytotoxicity, aggregation into insoluble tau species and truncation/phosphorylation of tau.
In the 24-hour timeframe of the experiments described herein, an increase in cell death was observed following exposure of differentiated neuroblastoma cells to aggregated dGAE but minimal differences in the viability of cells treated with soluble dGAE.
Under conditions used here, aggregated dGAE appeared to be more acutely toxic to differentiated neuroblastoma cells following the 24 h incubation period. Although minimally toxic even at higher concentrations, the dGAE in its soluble form was nevertheless internalised into differentiated neuroblastoma cells within 2-h exposure. After agitation, the dGAE-488 is internalised much less efficiently. In the present study, some internalisation using aggregated preparations was observed but these may be soluble or partially soluble species that remain in solution during preparation of filaments. It is likely that the agitated dGAE-488 contains a mixture of sizes of tau assemblies, some of which are internalised and some of which are not. Whilst the exact species being internalised remains to be resolved, the soluble dGAE preparation consists of aggregates ranging in diameter from 10-80 nm implying a manifold of oligomeric forms (
Furthermore, the time taken for 0 h dGAE to become toxic may be longer than the timeframe of these experiments. The internalisation described herein does not require exogenous factors either for aggregation or for cellular uptake.
The present studies have investigated whether endogenous tau could be recruited and converted into insoluble forms following uptake of soluble dGAE into the cytoplasm. The interaction of between endocytosed tau with cytosolic tau has been investigated previously in various cell models that have required the overexpression of human tau, or by introducing exogenous tau with the help of protein delivery reagents.
The data presented herein shows that incubation with soluble forms of dGAE results in a local increase in endogenous phospho-tau in cells with normal levels of endogenous tau, consistent with tau pathology in AD. Using dGAE-488 together with antibodies recognising epitopes outside the repeat domain to probe the phosphorylation state of endogenous tau protein, it has been shown herein that there is an increase in phosphorylation of endogenous tau at T231 and S202-T205. These changes are accompanied by an increase in levels of insoluble phosphorylated tau protein after sequential extraction, but not in the whole lysate. Western blots from whole lysate did not reveal any clear differences in phospho-tau levels using AT80 or AT180 which may suggest that overall levels remain constant, but that local phospho-tau levels increase within areas of insoluble/aggregated tau as shown by immunofluorescence and following sequential extraction. The mechanism of induction of aggregation or increased phosphorylation following uptake of soluble forms of dGAE is not known at this stage. This truncated tau species is able to self-aggregate spontaneously without any requirement for phosphorylation. Here we show that dGAE co-aggregates with endogenous tau and that these accumulate together within endosomal/lysosomal compartments.
The present disclosure shows that the majority of dGAE that is internalised by cells is localised to lysosomal compartments. Using immunogold TEM, the localisation of dGAE-488 to vesicular structures has been demonstrated with a size range suggestive of lysosomal compartments.
The immunofluorescence and TEM findings together suggest the accumulation of both dGAE and endogenous tau within the endo-lysosomal compartments. These findings provide a novel perspective on the ultrastructure of cells following internalisation of a pathological form of tau and suggests that the autophagy pathway may be implicated in its degradation.
Physiological and pathological forms of tau are cleared by the proteasomal and autophagic degradative systems and it has been suggested that pathological tau is preferentially degraded by the autophagic-lysosomal system. It is possible that the accumulation of pathological tau may interfere with the normal functioning of these degradative processes. In AD, there is support for impaired degradation of autophagic vacuoles by lysosomes suggesting that incomplete clearance of pathological tau could contribute to neuronal dysfunction. Understanding how accumulated tau species can be cleared from cells may allow for the development of complementary therapeutic approaches in addition to inhibition of tau aggregation.
The ease with which soluble dGAE self-assembles and internalises into neuronal cells makes it possible to study the effect of its self-assembly in a cellular environment, in particular its effect on acute toxicity and its influence on phosphorylation state and insolubility of endogenous tau at an ultrastructural level. This approach will provide a useful tool to facilitate the study of tau aggregation in the absence of any overexpression of the protein, post-translational modification, or inducers of assembly and ultimately to study the mechanism of action of tau aggregation inhibitors that target tau seeding and neuronal transmission in AD and related tauopathies.
As stated above, preferred features of the second and subsequent aspects of the invention are as for the first aspect mutatis mutandis.
The present invention will now be further described with reference to the following Examples which are included for the purposes of reference only and should not be construed as being limitations on the invention, reference is also made to a number of figures in which:
Preparation of Recombinant dGAE
Purified recombinant truncated tau (dGAE, corresponding to amino acid residues 297-391 using numbering from 2N4R tau) was used throughout the study. Recombinant tau protein 297-391 was purified as previously described in Al-Hilaly et al (J. Mol. Biol., vol. 429, no. 23, pp 3650-3665 (2017)). Following purification, dGAE exists in a predominantly random coil conformation and consists mainly of soluble monomer and dimer as previously characterised and described in Al-Hilaly et al (J. Mol. Biol., vol. 429, no. 23, pp 3650-3665 (2017)).
To generate fluorescently tagged tau protein (dGAE-488), dGAE was covalently labelled with Alexa Fluor 488® (Life Technologies) by mixing 200 μl protein (425.2 μM) with 10 μl 113 nM Alexa Fluor® TFP ester and 20 μl 1M sodium bicarbonate (pH 8.3). The mixture was left to incubate in the dark for 15 minutes at room temperature. Zeba 7K MWCO columns (Thermo Scientific) were equilibrated by adding 1 ml 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and centrifuging at 1,000×g for 2 minutes at 4° C. The eluate was discarded and the process was repeated three times. The protein/dye mixture was added drop-wise onto the top of the column immediately followed by 40 μl phosphate buffer and was centrifuged at 1,000×g for 2 minutes at 4° C. The protein solution was kept on ice and the absorbance at 280 nm (A280) was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. The protein concentration was calculated using the A280, and the molar extinction coefficient of dGAE (1,400 cm−1 M−1), taking into account the absorption of the dye at A494. dGAE has 14 lysine residues, which are all potential sites at which the 488 dye can bind. The extent of labelling was determined by the A494 and the molar extinction coefficient of the dye (71,000 cm−1 M−1). The protein (dGAE-488) was used immediately for subsequent experiments or subjected to agitation in vitro.
In Vitro Assembly of dGAE and dGAE-488
In vitro assembly of dGAE and dGAE-488 was performed as previously described in Al-Hilaly et al (J. Mol. Biol., vol. 429, no. 23, pp 3650-3665 (2017)) without reducing agent. Briefly, 100 μM protein was diluted in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and incubated at 37° C. whilst agitating with a speed of 700 rpm on an Eppendorf ThermoMixer® for 72 hours. Samples were visualised using negative stain transmission electron microscopy (TEM). All experiments were conducted using the stock 100 μM dGAE in phosphate buffer.
Aliquots (4 μl) of dGAE assembly mixtures (100 μM in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) were placed on 400-mesh carbon-coated grid and incubated for 1 minute. After removing excess solution with filter paper, the grid was washed with 4 μl filtered Milli-Q water for 1 minute and blotted. The grids were negatively stained with 4 μl filtered 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 1 minute, blotted dry and left to air dry for at least five minutes. Grids were examined on a JEOL JEM1400-Plus Transmission Electron Microscope at 100 kV and electron micrograph images were collected using 4k×4k One View (Gatan) camera.
Circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD) was performed using a Jasco Spectrometer J715 and spectra collected in triplicate at a maintained temperature of 21° C. Protein samples were placed into 0.02 mm path length quartz cuvettes (Hellma) and scanned from 180 to 320 nm. CD data were converted to molar ellipticity (deg·cm2·dmol−1).
Cell Culture and dGAE Treatment
Undifferentiated SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) supplemented with 10% Foetal Calf Serum (FCS), 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) and 1% L-glutamine. For differentiation, SH-SY5Y cells were plated at a density of 50,000 cells per well in 24-well plates or 300,000 cells per well in 6-well plates. For immunofluorescence, cells were plated onto Menzel-Gläser coverslips (Thermo Scientific). For live-cell imaging, cells were plated on 35-mm dishes on a 1.5-mm coverslip (Mattek). On the first day of differentiation, media was replaced with low-serum culture media (DMEM/F-12 containing 1% FCS, 1% P/S and 1% L-glutamine) containing 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid (RA) (Sigma-Aldrich) and cells were incubated for 48 h. On day 3, this process was repeated with fresh RA and cells were incubated for a further 48 h. On day 5, the cells were washed once in serum-free culture media to remove traces of serum. Serum-free culture media (DMEM/F-12 containing 1% P/S and 1% L-glutamine) containing 50 ng/ml brain-derived neurotrophic factor (STEMCELL Technologies) was added to the cells and incubated for 48 h. Differentiated cells (dSH-SY5Y) were ready to use for experiments on day 7. For dGAE treatment, cells were exposed to 1 μM dGAE (either soluble without agitation or after agitation) and incubated for 24 h. All experiments were conducted using dSH-SY5Y cells.
Following the addition of dGAE, cell viability was measured using ReadyProbes® Cell Viability Imaging Kit (Life Technologies). The kit contains a NucBlue® reagent to label all cells (blue) and a NucGreen® reagent to label dead cells only (green). For tagged dGAE, NucRed® reagent was used to label dead cells (red). One drop of each reagent was added to cells in 500 μl media as described in the manufacturers protocol (Life Technologies). Cells were incubated with the reagents at 37° C. for 15 minutes and the media was replaced with Live Cell Imaging Solution (Invitrogen™, Thermo Scientific). Cells were imaged using a Zeiss Cell Observer Axiovert 200M microscope. DAPI fluorescence was captured using a G 365 excitation filter and a LP 420 emission filter with a FT 395 dichroic. Green fluorescence was captured using a FITC filter set (BP 450-490 excitation filter, BP 515-565 emission filter and FT 510 dichroic). Identical acquisition settings were used for all replicates and images were analysed using FIJI. Six fields of view were taken per sample and an average of 4500 cells were analysed per condition. The proportion of buffer-treated cell death was quantified by converting the images to grayscale followed by manually adjusting the threshold and converting it into a binary image to highlight live DAPI-stained cells. The number of cells was automatically counted. The dead cells were counted in the same way and cell death was expressed as a percentage of buffer-treated cells.
Cells were detached from the coverslip by incubation in 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco™) and then mixed with 5 ml culture media. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 500×g for 5 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was resuspended in ice-cold PBS and centrifuged at 500×g at 4° C. Cells were lysed in 1% Triton lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100 (v/v), 150 mM NaCl and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6) containing Halt™ protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific) and phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific) for 15 minutes on ice. The samples were centrifuged at 16,000×g for 30 minutes at 4° C., and the supernatant was collected (Triton-soluble fraction). The pellet was resuspended in SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS (w/v), 150 mM NaCl and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The samples were centrifuged at 16,000×g for 30 minutes at room temperature and the supernatant was collected (Triton-insoluble fraction). Protein concentration in the Triton-soluble fractions were determined using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
For cell lysates, Triton-soluble protein (20 μg) and an equal volume of Triton-insoluble protein were each mixed with Læmmli sample buffer (4×) (Bio-Rad Laboratories) containing 5% (v/v) p-mercaptoethanol and heated at 95° C. for 5 minutes. For recombinant protein, 3 μg was mixed with sample buffer without reducing agent or boiling. All samples were centrifuged for five minutes at 1000×g and samples were loaded onto 4-20% Mini-PROTEAN® precast gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and run at 120 V for 1 h in Tris-glycine running buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3), or until the sample buffer reached the end of the gel. For Coomassie staining, the gel was washed three times in double distilled water for five minutes and stained with Imperial™ protein stain (Thermo Scientific) for 1 h and then destained overnight in double distilled water. The stained gel was scanned using an HP Photosmart C5280 scanner. For western blotting, the separated proteins on the gel were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (0.45 μm) at 200 mA for 90 minutes. The membranes were blocked in 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.4, 150 mM NaCl) containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20 (TBS-T) for 1 h rocking at room temperature. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in 5% BSA in TBS-T overnight at 4° C. The following primary antibodies and dilutions were used; Anti-Tau (polyclonal, total tau) (Thermo Scientific) (1:2500), AT180 (anti-pT231) (Thermo Scientific) (1:1000), AT8 (anti-pS202-T205) (1:1000) (Thermo Scientific), anti-GAPDH (1:5000) (Abcam). The next day, membranes were incubated in horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-anti-mouse antibody (1:5000) (Sigma-Aldrich) or HRP-anti-rabbit antibody (1:5000) (Abcam) in 5% BSA in TBS-T for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed 3×10 mins in TBS-T between antibody incubations. Immunoreactive protein bands were detected using ECL substrate (Clarity™, Bio-Rad) and X-ray films were scanned using an HP Photosmart C5280 scanner. FIJI was used to quantify the bands in arbitrary densitometry units. The density of bands corresponding to full-length tau (50-70 kDa) were determined and normalised against amount of GAPDH. These values were used to calculate the proportion of total tau that is phosphorylated, expressing the proportions as a percentage of the buffer-treated control group. For the quantification of Triton-insoluble and soluble protein, the proportion of tau in the insoluble and soluble fraction was calculated using the equations insoluble/(soluble+insoluble) or soluble/(soluble+insoluble), respectively and expressed as a percentage of the respective soluble or insoluble control value.
Cell culture medium was aspirated from dSH-SY5Y cells and washed once with PBS. Cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 15 minutes followed by three washes in PBS. For permeabilization, the cells were incubated in 0.25% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes. Cells were blocked in 2% (w/v) BSA in PBS for 1 h, followed by three washes in PBS. Primary antibodies diluted in 2% (w/v) BSA in PBS and were incubated with the cells for 1 h. The primary antibodies and dilutions used were; AT180 (anti-pT231) (1:250) (Thermo Scientific), AT8 (anti-pS202-T205) (1:500) (Thermo Scientific) and Tau1 (dephosphorylated tau at S195, 198, 199 and 202) (Merck Millipore). Cells were incubated with goat anti-mouse-Alexa Fluor® 594 (1:1000) (Invitrogen™, Thermo Scientific) diluted in 2% (w/v) BSA in PBS for 1 h in the dark. Cells were washed 3 times in PBS between antibody incubations. Cells were mounted onto glass slides using Prolong Gold mounting medium containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Mounted slides were stored in the dark at room temperature for 24-48 h before imaging and kept at 4° C. for long term storage. Cells were imaged using Leica SP8 confocal microscope.
Cells were plated on 35-mm dishes on a 1.5-mm coverslip (Mattek). Following differentiation, dGAE-488 (5 μM) was added to the cells for 24 h. For labelling lysosomes and endosomes, LysoTracker® red (Life Technologies) was diluted in culture media at a final concentration of 50 nM and incubated for 90 mins before imaging using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope.
All confocal microscopy imaging was carried using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. The instrument setting used PMT 3 and PMT Trans channels/lasers and images were acquired with a HC PLAPoCs2 63×/1.40 oil-immersion objective lens. Samples were scanned sequentially to prevent spectral bleed through. All images were collected as Z-stacks for all channels using a step size of 0.5 μm. Five to ten Z-stacks were taken for each sample and each experiment was repeated three times or more. To monitor live uptake of dGAE-488, the environment was maintained at 37° C. with humidified CO2 and the Adaptive Focus Control feature was used to maintain constant focal planes throughout the course of the experiment.
DSH-SY5Y cells were treated with Alexa Fluor® 488 containing buffer, or 10 μM freshly prepared dGAE-488 for 24 h. The cells were washed once in PBS, scraped into a tube and centrifuged at 500×g for 5 minutes. The media was removed and the cells were suspended in a 1:1 mixture of pre-warmed culture media: 4% (v/v) PFA for 15 minutes at 37° C. The cells were centrifuged at 500×g for 5 mins and the cells were resuspended in fresh 4% (v/v) PFA and 0.1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (GA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 3 h at room temperature. The fixed cells were centrifuged at 1,000×g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was suspended in 50 mM glycine in PBS for 10 minutes at room temperature. The cells were centrifuged at 1,000×g for 5 minutes and the pellet was washed three times with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Around 200 μl 4% (w/v) low melting point agarose was added to the cells and immediately centrifuged at 1,000×g for 10 minutes at 30° C. The tube was immediately transferred to 4° C. or on ice for 20 minutes to solidify the agarose. The agarose-embedded cell pellet was transferred to a new tube and washed 2-3 times with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The pellet was post-fixed in a reduced osmium solution (1% (v/v) osmium tetroxide, 1.5% (w/v) potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 1 h at 4° C. followed by washing three times in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and three times in double-distilled H2O for 5 minutes each. The pellet was dehydrated in an ethanol series consisting of 30, 50, 75, 90 and 95% ethanol for 15 minutes each at 4° C. followed by three incubations in 100% ethanol for 20 minutes each at 4° C. The sample was then infiltrated in a 2:1 mixture of 100% ethanol:Unicryl™ resin (for 30 minutes followed by a 1:2 mixture of 100% ethanol:Unicryl™ resin (BBI Solutions) for 30 mins. Finally, the pellet was transferred to a BEEM capsule (Agar Scientific) and infiltrated in complete Unicryl™ resin overnight at 4° C. The resin was cured using light-polymerisation for 48 h by illumination from the underside of the BEEM capsules from a 12 V, 100 W type 6834 Philips projection lamp at a distance of 35 cm. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were taken using a diamond knife on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome fitted with a Leica M80 microscope (Leica Microsystems) and placed on 300 Mesh Hexagon Nickel 3.05 mm grids (Agar Scientific Ltd) before proceeding with immunogold labelling.
A modified PBS (pH 8.2) containing 1% BSA, 500 μl/L Tween-20, 10 mM Na-EDTA and 0.2 g/L NaN3 (termed PBS+) was used throughout the following procedures for all dilutions of antibodies and gold probes. The ultrathin sections were initially blocked using normal goat serum (diluted 1:10 dilution in PBS+; Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 minutes at room temperature and then incubated with anti-Alexa Fluor® 488 primary antibody (1:50) (Thermo Scientific). The sections were washed three times in PBS+ for 2 minutes each followed by incubation with 10 nm gold particle-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary probe at a 1:10 dilution in PBS+ for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were washed three times in PBS+ for 10 minutes each and four times in distilled water for 5 minutes each. Immunogold-labelled thin sections were subsequently post-stained in 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 1 h before imaging on the TEM.
FIJI (https://fiji.sc) imaging processing package (J. Schindelin et al., Nat. Methods, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 676-682, (2012)) was used for all image analysis. For quantification of fluorescence intensities, images were Z-projected to maximal intensity. Five to ten fields of view were taken from each condition and an average of 50 cells per condition were subjected to analysis. Firstly, a region of interest (the cell body) was drawn around an individual cell, excluding cells that had fused nuclei. Area-integrated intensity and mean grey value were measured as well as three selections from around the cell with no fluorescence (background). The corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) was then calculated using the equation:
CTCF=Integrated Density−(Area of selected cell×Mean fluorescence of background readings)
For quantification of internalised dGAE-488, a focal plane from the middle of the cell that contained maximal DAPI fluorescence was selected and subjected to analysis.
Data and statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 7. All data are expressed as the mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). When comparing two groups, Student's unpaired t-test with Welch's correction was used to determine statistical significance. When comparing more than two groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnet's post-hoc test was used to determine differences between experimental groups and a control group. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if p<0.05.
Soluble dGAE was fluorescently labelled using an Alexa-fluor 488 tag (dGAE-488) to enable internalisation of dGAE assemblies to be monitored and to distinguish exogenous dGAE from endogenously expressed tau. On average, there were 0.1 moles of 488 dye per mole of protein after every labelling reaction. The Alexafluor-tag labels amino groups at the N-terminus and on lysine residues, and hence we examined the tagged and untagged dGAE using TEM, SDS-PAGE and CD spectroscopy to determine whether the label affects aggregation and/or filament formation. Using the non-reducing conditions for aggregation established previously (Al-Hilaly et al., J. Mol. Biol., vol. 429, no. 23, pp 3650-3665 (2017)), dGAE and dGAE-488 produced morphologically similar short twisted fibrils (
Aggregated dGAE (100 μM agitated for 72 h) and soluble dGAE (100 μM 0 h, no agitation) were applied at a concentration of 1 μM directly to dSH-SY5Y cells and incubated for 24 h. Cell viability was measured after 24 h using the ReadyProbes® assay to measure cell death (
The uptake of soluble and aggregated dGAE into dSH-SY5Y cells was investigated in order to examine whether aggregation state affects the efficiency of internalisation. The labelled dGAE-488 form was used to permit uptake to be visualised and measured having corrected for total cell fluorescence. Soluble or aggregated (72 h) dGAE-488 was incubated with dSH-SY5Y cells at 1 μM for 24 h. Confocal microscopy analysis showed that following exposure to soluble dGAE-488, fluorescence was observed within the cells as punctate staining (
The results presented herein suggest that incubation with aggregated dGAE leads to significant cell death after incubation for only 24 h, whereas soluble dGAE is internalised but does not appear to be significantly toxic following 24 h incubation. Therefore, it was further investigated whether internalised soluble dGAE-488 may be capable of altering the aggregation or phosphorylation state of endogenous tau. Following exposure to soluble 1 μM dGAE-488, cells were fixed and immunolabelled using antibodies recognising tau epitopes outside of the dGAE sequence allowing specific detection of only endogenous tau (
Western blots of the whole cell lysates were performed to examine the effect of exogenously applied dGAE on endogenous tau phospho-epitopes. Comparison of cells incubated with soluble dGAE with buffer-treated control cells revealed no change in levels of total tau and marginal increases in AT8 or AT180 immunoreactivity that did not reach statistical significance. While western blots measure total levels of phospho-tau in cells, immunofluorescent imaging is able to highlight subcellular localisation of any increases. In order to determine the effects of internalised soluble dGAE-488 on the solubility of endogenous tau in neurons, we undertook sequential extraction of tau protein from cell lysates following solubilisation with 1% Triton X-100 and centrifugation (16,000 g for 30 minutes). Following incubation with soluble dGAE for 24 h, there was a clear redistribution of tau protein immunolabelled with AT180 from Triton-X 100-soluble to Triton-X 100-insoluble fractions following incubation with soluble dGAE compared with buffer-treated controls. dGAE incubation produced a reduction in soluble tau immunoreactive with AT180 (83.0±5.5%, p=0.0201) and an increase in the insoluble form (139.4±14.5%, p=0.0352) (
Intracellular fluorescent punctate particles were observed within the cytoplasm, close to the nucleus after 24 h of exposure of neurons to soluble dGAE-488. This staining pattern was consistent with its localisation in cytosolic vesicles. We therefore examined whether internalised dGAE-488 was localised to endosomal/lysosomal compartments. Soluble dGAE-488 was incubated with cells for 24 h and stained with LysoTracker®, a dye that labels acidic organelles (lysosomes and late endosomes), for 30 mins and then fixed and visualised by confocal microscopy. There was a significant increase in the intensity of the LysoTracker® fluorescence in cells exposed to soluble dGAE-488 compared to buffer-treated control cells (211.9±9.9%, p<0.0001;
TEM was used to examine the ultrastructure of accumulated tau and dGAE-488 in cells. dSH-SY5Y were exposed to 10 μM soluble dGAE-488 for 24 h and were processed for immunogold TEM using an antibody against Alexa Fluor® 488 to label dGAE-488 specifically. Vesicular structures and mitochondria were observed within the sectioned cells confirming that the TEM protocol preserved the cellular structure (
SHSY5Y cells are plated in 24 well plates (30,000 cells per well) and either differentiated using retinoic acid in depleted serum medium, as described previously, or left undifferentiated. Cells are treated in one of the following ways; either (1) pre-incubated in the presence of an agent of interest prior to adding tau aggregates or (2) co-incubated with an agent of interest and tau aggregates administered at the same time. Times for incubation are 24 hours at each stage meaning the total time for (1) is 48 hours and 24 hours for (2). dGAE-488 (1 μM) incubated with cells for 24 hours is sufficient for internalised protein to be seen. Following incubation, cells are photographed and analysis of images performed using ImageJ to quantify the fluorescence intensity within the cell body to provide a measure of dGAE-488 internalisation. The number of cells is counted to express the level of internalisation as mean fluorescence intensity/cell to take into account different numbers of cells in fields of view. Fragments of dGAE-488 are added at 1 μM. Agents for screening can be tested initially at a single concentration of 10 μM; those showing inhibitory activity are then tested over at a range of concentrations from 2 μM down to 20 nM and the activity of compounds reported as the concentration at which 50% inhibition of activity is observed. The activities to be measured include: (i) internalisation of tau measured by intracellular fluorescence; (ii) intracellular aggregation of tau measured by harvesting cells, lysing them and separating aggregated tau by ultracentrifugation and measuring aggregated tau by immunoblot with anti-tau antibody; and (iii) cytotoxicity measured using the ReadyProbes® assay to measure cell death (
dGAE protein was diluted into 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (PB) with monoclonal antibody s1 D12 at a ratio of 4:1 protein:Ab (100 μM dGAE+25 μM s1D12 and 10 μM dGAE+2.5 μM s1D12) or 1:1 (25 μM dGAE+25 μM s1D12).
“s1D12” refers to a monoclonal antibody disclosed in UK application no. GB2010652.2 filed on 10 Jul. 2020, and an international (PCT) application filed on 9 Jul. 2021 in the name of WisTa Laboratories Ltd, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The epitope bound by the CDRs of the specific binding molecule referred to as “S1D12” herein may be within an amino acid sequence comprising residues 337 to 349 of SEQ ID NO: 1 or preferably within an amino acid sequence comprising residues 341 to 353 of SEQ ID NO: 1. The epitope may comprise the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8 (VEVKSEKLDFKDR). S1D12 comprises the CDRs VHCDR1, VHCDR2, VHCDR3, VLCDR1, VLCDR2 and VLCDR3, wherein each of said CDRs comprises an amino acid sequence as follows:
s1D12 may comprise:
or a humanized variant of either thereof.
s1D12 may comprise:
or a humanized variant of either thereof.
As a positive control, dGAE was prepared at a final concentration of 10, 25 or 100 μM in 10 mM PB. Negative controls consisted of dGAE with a non-tau IgG antibody at a ratio of 4:1 (10 μM dGAE+2.5 μM anti-ovalbumin), or antibody alone (25 or 2.5 μM s1D12 and 2.5 μM anti-ovalbumin). Samples were agitated at 700 rpm at 37° C. for 3 days.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), circular dichroism (CD) and Thioflavin S (ThS) assays were performed as detailed in Al-Hilaly et. al. (2018) J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4119-4131. Briefly, TEM grids were prepared by adding 4 μL of sample to a carbon-coated grid followed by a wash with milli-Q filtered water then staining twice with 2% uranyl acetate. Grids were air dried and then imaged using a JEOL electron microscope operating at 80 kV.
For CD, 60 μL sample was placed in a 0.1 mm quartz cuvette and placed into a JASCO spectropolarimeter. 100 μL ThS in 20 mM MOPS buffer was added to 50 μL of each sample to a final concentration of 20 μM, mixed well, incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes then fluorescence intensity measured in a Cary Eclipse spectrophotometer using an excitation wavelength of 440 nm. Baseline readings from 10 mM PB were subtracted from CD and ThS measurements.
The findings from these three experiments indicate that s1D12 inhibits the assembly of dGAE into fibrils in vitro.
Firstly, dGAE fibrils were readily observed by TEM in samples using concentrations as low as 10 μM; at the same concentration in the presence of s1D12, no fibrils were present suggesting inhibition of assembly. Fibrils were present when using the same molar ratios of dGAE:Ab with a non-tau antibody, showing that the inhibitory effect is specific.
Circular dichroism reports on secondary structure characteristics of proteins in solution. Although 10 and 25 μM dGAE were too low in concentration to be observed using CD, and the signal is dominated by the characteristic 3-sheet signal expected from the antibody structure. At 100 μM dGAE, a random coil confirmation is revealed when the antibody CD signal is subtracted from the dGAE signal. This further indicates that for s1D12:dGAE at a ratio of 4:1, dGAE cannot assemble into 3-sheet rich fibrils.
Finally, Thioflavin S was used to report on the presence of fibrils. ThS is a dye that binds to amyloid, the underlying structure in dGAE fibrils, and fluoresces at a characteristic wavelength of around 483 nm when excited with light of a wavelength of 440 nm. A positive signal was clearly observed for 25 and 100 μM dGAE fibrils. However, when incubated with s1D12 at ratios of either 4:1 or 1:1, this signal was abolished, supporting the previous observations that no fibrils are present when dGAE is incubated with s1D12.
Collectively, these results provide evidence that (i) s1D12 specifically inhibits the assembly of dGAE into fibrils and (ii) these assays can be utilized to determine the inhibitory activity of other antibodies in disrupting formation of fibrils that strongly resemble the paired helical filaments that are present in the tau pathology characteristic of Alzheimer's disease.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010620.9 | Jul 2020 | GB | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/069138 | 7/9/2021 | WO |
