Patent Grant
8914789
The present invention relates to the electrical, electronic and computer arts, and, more particularly, to information technology and the like.
Presently, server migration is handled in a rather ad hoc fashion. Servers are initially discovered using a variety of discovery tools. Analysis is then applied to the server data to develop so-called placement and wave planning guides. The placement indicates where in the target environment the servers are to be migrated to, while the wave planning indicates in which order the servers are to be migrated. Typically, wave planning is based on the resources available to carry out the migration, the change windows, and so on. The migrations are then effectuated using a variety of tools and technologies.
Principles of the invention provide techniques for systematic migration of workload based on classification. In one aspect, an exemplary method includes the steps of obtaining data characterizing a source computing environment having at least one hardware resource and at least one workload; obtaining a specification of a target computing environment to which the at least one workload is to be migrated in a migration; based on the data characterizing the source computing environment and the specification of the target computing environment, categorizing the migration into one of a plurality of categories; and specifying the migration in accordance with a migration technique selected based on the categorizing step.
In another aspect, another exemplary method includes the steps of obtaining configuration data indicative of a plurality of potential source computing environments appropriate for migration; obtaining application assessment data; selecting search criteria; displaying results based on at least the application assessment data and searching with the search criteria; obtaining a selection of at least one of the potential source computing environments as indeed being appropriate for the migration; and storing the selection in a target list.
As used herein, “facilitating” an action includes performing the action, making the action easier, helping to carry the action out, or causing the action to be performed. Thus, by way of example and not limitation, instructions executing on one processor might facilitate an action carried out by instructions executing on a remote processor, by sending appropriate data or commands to cause or aid the action to be performed. For the avoidance of doubt, where an actor facilitates an action by other than performing the action, the action is nevertheless performed by some entity or combination of entities.
One or more embodiments of the invention or elements thereof can be implemented in the form of a computer program product including a computer readable storage medium with computer usable program code (stored therein in a non-transitory manner) for performing the method steps indicated. Furthermore, one or more embodiments of the invention or elements thereof can be implemented in the form of a system (or apparatus) including a memory, and at least one processor that is coupled to the memory and operative to perform exemplary method steps. Yet further, in another aspect, one or more embodiments of the invention or elements thereof can be implemented in the form of means for carrying out one or more of the method steps described herein; the means can include (i) specialized hardware module(s), (ii) software module(s) stored in a non-transitory manner in a computer readable storage medium (or multiple such media) and implemented on a hardware processor, or (iii) a combination of (i) and (ii); any of (i)-(iii) implement the specific techniques set forth herein.
Techniques of the present invention can provide substantial beneficial technical effects. For example, one or more embodiments may provide one or more of the following advantages:
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments thereof, which is to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings.
One or more embodiments provide techniques to migrate workload based on a classification. Some instances are directed towards providing a virtualized service, with both a migration aspect and a steady state aspect. Some embodiments provide techniques to select accounts that are good candidates for migration; in at least some instances, the criteria for a good candidate is that migrations fit characteristics that allow them to migrate inexpensively. A non-limiting example of such cases includes the WINDOWS® (registered mark of Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Wash., USA)/X86 environment, with simple workloads in accordance with criteria defined herein.
As will be discussed in greater detail below in connection with
One approach for S1 and/or S2 is disclosed in co-assigned US Patent Publication 2010-0318608, Dec. 16, 2010, of Kunwadee Sripanidkulchai et al., entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT LIVE APPLICATION MIGRATION WITHIN BANDWIDTH CONSTRAINED NETWORKS,” which uses VPN and/or NAT technology; the complete disclosure of same is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Also expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes is co-assigned US Patent Publication 2010-0293168, Nov. 18, 2010, of Manish Gupta et al., entitled “DETERMINING CONFIGURATION PARAMETER DEPENDENCIES VIA ANALYSIS OF CONFIGURATION DATA FROM MULTI-TIERED ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS”; this reference supplements the approach adopted for S1/S2 that accommodates application dependency corrections as referenced in S3. S4-S6 involve middleware updates, application updates and operating system (OS) updates respectively. One or more embodiments perform systematic updates to the middleware (application/OS) packages on the target system after the migration has taken place. One or more exemplary methods begin with a systematic process for handling migrations into virtualized environments. The initial pre-screening for accounts selects good candidate(s) using analytics provided from, for example, a global asset configuration warehouse, and questionnaire data provided by subject matter experts (SMEs).
One or more embodiments provide decision logic for classifying which method to use to migrate workload. One characteristic of one or more embodiments is that models for installation of selected middleware packages are used. These process models are then composed (e.g., installation of an application server such as IBM WEBSPHERE® APPLICATION SERVER (WAS) followed by a database such as IBM DB2® (registered marks of International Business machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., USA)) in accordance with the overall server build process. Typical models are developed for middleware packages such as WAS, DB2, MQ (IBM Message Queuing System), and the like. A non-limiting example of these concepts for WAS is provided hereinbelow.
One significant aspect of one or more embodiments is that it is possible to tie a characterization of a workload migration to an approach which is then used to effectuate that migration. A migration is, in essence, where it is desired to migrate workloads (applications) from one environment to another environment—in general, there may be few or many changes involved. In one or more embodiments, by a careful analysis of the source environment (source), along with a characterization of the changes that must take place in order to render the solution on the target, a number of different approaches can be adopted for actually effectuating the migration itself. An analysis of the source configuration, coupled with a specification of what is going to change (which specification may be at several levels of granularity), is actually sufficient to select the approach that is going to be used, and then to actually execute the changes.
One embodiment of an appropriate classification is seen in
In essence,
When the IP and host names change but nothing else changes, the migration may be characterized, in the exemplary embodiment, as an S2 migration, as seen at decision block 114 (NO branch) and block 116. Some workloads (applications) have application dependencies. Application dependencies (the other applications and databases that a particular application needs to interact with to function properly) per se, and their discovery, are well-known to the skilled artisan (e.g., IBM's Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager TADDM). An example of this type of scenario is a business application which has a database on a separate server. Database connection information may be, for example, a configuration element in the application. When the application is moved to a different host name and IP address, it will be necessary to go in and change the configuration information for the database connector. This can occur when the application includes different communicating components which need to know about each other and/or when the application needs to communicate with external applications which need to know about the application in question. In such instances, the migration may be characterized, in the exemplary embodiment, as an S3 migration, as seen at decision block 114 (YES branch) and block 118.
To summarize, S1 corresponds to no changes, S2 corresponds to a host name and IP address change only; and S3 corresponds to a case where there are configuration changes due to application dependencies, but that is all (i.e., not a new version of the software (SW) or a change in the platform).
Where more changes are required, consider the three layers of SW: OS, MW, and application. In the more transformative cases, consider situations where the OS, MW, or application are changing. S4, at 122, represents a MW change, as per the YES branch of decision block 106, as well as a NO in decision block 120, i.e., new server build not needed. S5, at 124, represents a case wherein the application is changing, as per the YES branch of decision block 108, as well as a NO in decision block 123, i.e., new server build not needed. S6, at 126, represents a case wherein the OS is changing, as per the YES branch of decision block 104, as well as a YES in decision block 125, i.e., new server build is needed (if not needed, go to category S7, at 128, as per the NO branch of block 125). If the OS changes, the MW must typically also be re-installed, and changes to the application may also be required. In the exemplary scheme of
Note that the YES branches of decision blocks 120 and 123 also result in an S6 categorization in the example of
Systematic coupling between the discovered information of the source environment and a specification of the target environment is significant in one or more embodiments. By way of clarification, a characterization or specification of the target is appropriate in one or more embodiments. When seeking to carry out a migration, there is typically an objective in mind. For example, consider cross-platform migrations for the purpose of data center consolidations. In one aspect, the configuration prior to and subsequent to the change may be viewed as givens, and one or more embodiments determine what is changing and specify a systematic way of making the change. The specification of the source environment is typically quite detailed, whereas that of the target environment is more in the nature of a desired objective and there may be fewer configuration details as compared to the source environment. Thus, the target environment may be specified in the nature of an objective (or objectives) that it is desired to obtain. For example, consider a business application such as a strategy management system to be moved from an existing configuration to a target. All the configuration of the source is already there, and deep discovery may be carried out to identify dependencies or the like. The target objective may be, for example, to run on a certain kind of system under a certain kind of operating system (for example, with a new IP address and a new host name). Based on the source specification and characterization of the target objectives, one or more embodiments provide a systematic methodology and technical approach to accomplish the migration from the source to the target. At present, this is typically carried out by hand by skilled practitioners. One or more embodiments provide a deep structural mapping between the target objectives and the approach used to accomplish the migration.
Expression of a Migration Method in Rules
Refer now to
Note also services layer 3204 with the corresponding services including discovery service 3222, opportunity selection service 3224, approach selection service 3226, migration request service 3228, provisioning service 3230, and asset 3232. Approach selection service 3226 is analogous to the rules engine 3112. In some instances, design data 3110 is used to configure the approach selection service 3226 which interacts with the migration plan user interface 3212.
In addition to source data 3108 and design data 3110, data store 3206 can also include, for example, provision data 3238 and assets 3240. Furthermore, in addition to data supplied by way of 3104, 3242, 3244, application assessment (e.g., questionnaire) data 3248 can be imported into data store 3206 via application assessment import service 3246. See also block 416 in
Thus, in one or more embodiments, opportunity identification user interface 3210 interacts with opportunity selection service 3224 to examine design data 3110 and identify fruitful opportunities.
In one or more embodiments, the Portal experience of 3202 that is provided by elements 3208-3218 makes use of an exposed migration object model 3220. Likewise, the services layers of 3204 as provided by elements 3222 to 3232 makes use of exposed migration object relational model 3220.
The notations “CALL VCONVERTER,” “CALL BLUE HORSE,” “PROVISION/INSTALL MW (MIDDLEWARE) USING DARWIN,” and “CONFIG.” all refer to various provisioning options; in general, the provisioning options get configured based on the selected approach and their details get filled out by the design UI for that particular system.
Referring now to
Consider now an exemplary opportunity identification process as in
In step 3408, display the results using the UI 3210 and a suitable hardware display device. In step 3410, see if the results are satisfactory. If so, in step 3412, store a target list of servers that represent good opportunities for migration. Optionally, also store with them the corresponding categories (i.e., in buckets corresponding to S1-S6), e.g., those servers with migrations in category S1 or S2; those servers with migrations in categories S3->S5, and those servers with migrations in category S6. These results could be stored, for example, in the design 3110 portion of the data store 3206. Thus, in one or more embodiments, the output is a classified list, and the process of
Consider now the migration planning UI 3212, wherein a precise focus on selection of the migration method to be applied takes place, with the aid of approach selection service 3226. Referring now to
If not, return to step 3506 and make refinements. If there is a match, select the provisioning approach in step 3512, using UI 3212 and service 3226, and in step 3514, set the provisioning engine configuration to effectuate the migration in accordance with the chosen technique. With reference again to
In one or more embodiments, the design UI 3214 will pop up to prompt the user to enter the required information into the fields needed for the chosen approach. The downstream provisioning engines to be selected correspond to the chosen approach.
Thus, the output of
The rules are considered more-or-less back to front, as the rules for S6, S5 and so on are simple and exclude cases from S1 and so on.
All the rules have migration methods as results, e.g., “if the OS is Windows 2000, then use migration method S6.”
In schema terms, in some instances, make migration method a fixed column in a table; alternatively, have a general table wherein additional attributes are defined for servers as attribute value pairs (server tags, e.g., server ID, attribute name migration type, attribute value S1). However, in some instances, a rules schema, even a general one, may not allow making server tags, at least not in any moderately elegant way. In some cases, one server tag implies adding a row to two different tables—a name-value pair, and a different table that links this to a server. In some cases, using tags means that it is possible to have multiple conflicting migration methods for one server. There is typically no simple way to make constraints over such a condition. With attributes, the situation is typically much clearer. Major and minor migration methods can be supported if needed.
Some embodiments employ a simple function “add_tag_to_server(physicalserverdimkey, tagtype, tagname)” which is included in the rules evaluation engine. An alternative is an attribute “MigrationMethod” of, say, VARCHAR 255, in PhysicalServerDim. For purposes of this non-limiting example, the latter is employed for simplicity and clarity. The rules are easy to change to the other variant.
Note that among the predefined rule types there is one about Migration Type, where the attribute changed is simply given as an abstract concept “Migration,” but as that is not defined as an actual database attribute, and it may be desirable to later select all servers of certain migration types, a more concrete variant may be appropriate in some instances.
A server that is not migrated at all is encoded as MigrationMethod=‘None.’ This could also be done by not giving a server a source server tag, but this may be less desirable if there is no clear scheme to distinguish initial non-candidates and later ones, and/or where deleting tags is yet another function that would need to be added to the rules schema.
S*, i.e., General Exclusions
The following table for each rule corresponds to a row in table RuleDim, except for the auto-generated RuleDimKey.
In the RuleXML the constant frame part is omitted for brevity; the UI will add that by itself in some instances.
The example looks as follows:
Windows Only: Although not part of the given rules, consider a non-virtualized server as a pre-condition in the non-limiting example.
With regard to <path>Source.OSShortName</path>, note that where the entire rules in a schema do not have common anchors, for OS-level rules the approach is workable, while software rules may be problematic in some instances.
With regard to <term>‘1’/term>, “1” means “YES.”
With regard to <path>Source.PhysicalServerDimKey. MigrationMethod</path>, recall that “Source” is a view, so in this example, nothing in it can be updated.
Disk Size: In one or more embodiments, the source view and the underlying PhysicalServerDim do not contain disk sizes. The attribute “ProvisionalDisk” indicates free disk space for additional provisioning of virtual machines. An overall disk size attribute is preferably added in one or more embodiments.
With regard to <term>256000</term>, in the non-limiting example, the individual disk sizes in the datamart are integers in megabytes (MB), so assume that this one is too for purposes of the experiment.
Memory Size:
No High Availability:
With regard to hardware_or_software_load_balanced_clustered</path>, the operator “:” is defined for one-to-many relationships. In this non-limiting example, assume that this means that a table name can be listed after the operator, and if that table has a foreign key back to the table before the “:,” then all rows are obtained in the named table that refer to the row that one was in before the “:,” and the outer operator; here “OR” is applied to them. In the non-limiting example, the foreign key back is “Server_ID,” and thus an additional interpretation step is appropriate wherein the foreign key is equated to the primary key PhysicalServerDimKey of PhysicalServerDim.
S6: Application Migration if Older OS Version
OS Version:
With regard to Priority 3, as these rules have a priority concept, it is possible to make this lower priority than the S* rules, thus ensuring servers only get into the S6 category if they have no S* exclusions. Higher numbers are lower priorities.
S4/5: Software Upgrades
Purely for purposes of illustration, the present example does not necessarily make a clear distinction between middleware and application in the S4/S5 contexts, and considers only the WEBSPHERE and DB2 applications, so the example considers S4, and does not have any S5.
Software Version as S4: In this non-limiting example, it may not be possible to navigate from “SourceView,” because the software name and version from the same software may be needed. It is possible to navigate back from software, but the fact that there is no common anchor in these rule types may make the situation ambiguous, i.e., the rule semantic as described does not state that the two literals in the antecedent refer to the same row in the software table, nevertheless, but this is needed, in the non-limiting example, to get the correct result. Other embodiments could employ a different approach.
With regard to <operator>NOT LIKE</operator>, assume for illustrative purposes that string comparison/pattern matching operators such as “LIKE” and “NOT LIKE” are present, as in the SQL language.
With regard to <term>‘9%’</term>, assume for this illustrative example that all versions starting with 9 are good enough.
Now a similar example is provided for WEBSPHERE. Some instances could employ a more complex path expression like {4,5}* or an antecedent like “IF subclass=WAS and (version=4 or version=5).”
xxx
With regard to <path>SoftwareDim.Subclass</path>, where there is no documentation about software names and subclasses used, it is possible to proceed with subclass, as in middleware_install_master in the SCOPE DB.
Software Version, Actual Upgrade: Specifically for software upgrades, in some instances, a REPLACE operator can be employed, rather than the normal equalities in other rules and the general rules schema. In some cases, the underlying target software table contains no pointer to the corresponding source software table; hence, there are many WAS 6.1 instances in the target, there is no indication which of them is, say, the WAS 5.1 from the source and which is the WAS 6.0 from the source. This can be taken into consideration as appropriate.
S4 is used as a precondition. This might not be necessary in this non-limiting case (because non-WINDOWS isn't migrated at all in the example), but such preconditions may be appropriate in more general cases. This might be hard to express if MigrationMethod were just a tag, because of lack of tag navigability.
With regard to <path>App</path>, this is prescribed for software replace rules. This concept is called “software” in other instances, while “app” stands for business applications. The skilled artisan will appreciate what is meant from the context.
Dozens more such rules can be developed, with all software names of DB2, and all individual versions, and then the same for WAS. The skilled artisan will be able to develop such rules, given the teachings herein, for other types of application software, as well.
S3: Distributed
In these scenarios, “distributedness” only seems to play a role for address relinking. Hence it should be used with lower priority than rules about addresses staying constant that place servers into S1.
Server Not Alone in Application: The first rule that characterizes a server s as belonging to a distributed application has the following logical structure:
The relation server_in_app(s, a) means that there is a row in table App_overview that contains server_ID s and Application_component_name a.
This can be expressed in the current rules structure, for example, using the not fully specified “:” navigation as follows.
The meaning of the following formula is as follows: As before, assume that two different paths starting in the same table also start in the same row, so start in the row of a specific physical server. The “term” part gives the ID of this server; call this “s” as in the formula above. In the “path” part, select each row in table “App_overview” that has a foreign key to the given server row, in an overall OR. The foreign key is Server_ID, so here select all rows with Server_ID=s. The next navigation is to Application_component_name in the same row, call this “a” as in the formula above. Now navigate again with an “all,” here to all rows in App_overview that have “a” as their application_component_name. So there is now an arbitrary second app_overview row, say r2, with the same application_component_name. Navigate to its Server_ID, say s2, and compare that with s.
Since still under the overall “OR,” the antecedent is fulfilled if there is any such s2≠s.
Server in Several Applications: The second rule that characterizes a server s as belonging to a distributed application has the following logical structure:
∃ application_component_name a, a2:
Both paths in the antecedent have the one-to-many navigation from a PhysicalServerDimKey s to rows in App_overview with s as their Server_ID. In both cases, look up the Application_component_name, say a and a2. The overall OR ensures that if any such a and a2 are unequal, case S3 (with the given rule priority) is the pertinent case.
Affinities: One criterion for S3 is that dependencies need to be relinked afterwards. Almost all servers have some dependencies nowadays, e.g., even print servers, which are typically characterized as easy migrations, have clients contacting them. Hence typical migrations try to retain addresses, at least Domain Name System (DNS) names and often also IP addresses, so that in spite of the dependencies no relinking is needed.
Here, however, information about address changes is not available, so plain rules about dependencies are made first. They are in the table server_relationships.
Assume that there is only interest in incoming dependencies, because only those need the addresses fixed if this server is moved. Hence the logical structure of this rule for a server s is:
∃ server s2: server_dependency(s, s2).
The table server_relationships is not complete for this purpose: It contains columns:
This means that only relations where both servers are in the discovered set are shown. However, dependencies from other servers are equally important in this case.
With regard to <path>Server_relationship.destination_host</path>, in some instances it is not possible to navigate from a server to rows in server_relationship with “:tablename” as before, because this time the table has two foreign keys to servers. In some cases, introduce a notation “:tablename[column].” In the current case, this can be avoided by starting the expression in the server_relationship table.
With regard to <term>“</term>, the condition that the hostname is not the empty string is not there for itself. It is preferable that a row with this destination host exists, but it is preferable to write it as some comparison, so this is a harmless one that does not exclude any hosts.
With regard to MigrationMethod</path>, navigations are typically written as x.yDimKey.z and it is assumed that yDimKey navigated to table y. In this case destination_host is a foreign key for PhysicalServerDimKey.
Consider now another non-limiting exemplary manner of specifying rules. In this non-limiting example, assume the source servers are all physical. Consider the rules primarily back to front, as the rules for S6, S5 and so on are simple and exclude cases from S1 and the like.
S*, i.e., General Exclusions
Consider here plain SQL queries, not rules, so all the S* rules go into one query. A view is created:
Utilization was used for these two, rather than physical parameters, because servers with low real memory/disk usage and high physical memory/disk should be good consolidation candidates.
Now architectural control:
and admin_email address like ‘%.ibm.com’
“Manager” might be a more suitable field in some instances. Now, consider disaster_recovery and availability:
and DR_partners is null
and DR_requirement is null
and DR_server is null
and DR_site is null
Some cases potentially use Interview_app_master.availability too. In some cases, inclusion of application clusters implies that research and replatform_approved=‘yes’
In some cases, test with the following view:
379 Servers in ECM
S6: Application Migration if Older OS Version
Recall that this example considers only Windows. Here the understanding is that anything older than Windows 2003 is “old.” That starts with version 5.2; 4 is added for safety.
In some cases, for testing on ECM:
S4/5: Software Upgrades
In some cases, the difference between middleware and application in the S4/S5 texts is blurred. In some cases, count as S4, and do not have any S5.
S3: Distributed
Recall that in these scenarios, in at least some cases, distributed-ness only seems to play a role for address re-linking. Hence it should be used with lower priority than rules about addresses staying constant that place servers into S1.
One-to-one mapping between Servers and Applications: The first rule that characterizes a server s as belonging to a distributed application has the following logical structure, saying that s is not alone in an application.
∃ server s2, application a:
The second rule that characterizes a server s as belonging to a distributed application expresses that the server belongs to several applications, it has the following logical structure:
∃ application_component_name a, a2:
SCOPEDB represents a primary application for a server differently from secondary ones. Given the second rule, it is possible to concentrate on the primary one in the first rule. In some cases, create an intermediate view for the first rule.
If this were the only criterion, the following view would be obtained, but at least some instances don't actually create it:
Affinities: One criterion for S3 is that dependencies need to be re-linked afterwards. Almost all servers have some dependencies nowadays, e.g., even print servers, which are typically characterized as easy migrations, have clients contacting them. Hence typical migrations try to retain addresses, at least DNS names and often also IP addresses, so that in spite of the dependencies no re-linking is needed. Here, however, information about address changes may not be available, so plain rules about dependencies are addressed first. Assume that the only interest is in incoming dependencies, because only those need the addresses fixed if this server is moved. Hence the logical structure of this rule for a server s is:
∃ server s2: server_dependency(s, s2).
In one or more embodiments, define the following conditions:
As this is still quite short overall, and one view is easier to maintain than many (one can't change a sub-view without also recreating a view that's based on it), in one or more embodiments, make this one big view:
In an experimental ECM test version:
S2: The Rest
In some cases lacking any criteria to distinguish S1 and S2, and where S1 is riskier, put all the remaining servers from S* into S2.
Exemplary Ready-to-Deploy Code
Herein is presented exemplary code to apply to a SCOPEDB as one command.
Exemplary Migration Scenarios
By way of review, referring again back to
Thus, the characterization of the source and the specification of the target, coupled with the decision logic in the middle (e.g., indicating that there is a middleware upgrade involved) provides an appropriate level of detail for the particular scenario and use case. Note that, in the non-limiting example, M400 refers to an on-image WEBSPHERE application upgrade, while a DB2 upgrade is referred to as M200. In the case of an application which has a server running WAS and DB2, M200 would be performed before M400, and then the post-migration configuration fix-up would be undertaken for each.
Still referring to
Referring now to
One or more embodiments provide rules materialized on top of the analytics tooling and data discovery tooling, as well as a set of tools which effect the various changes referred to. In some cases, the step between the two is a manual step.
One or more embodiments output the appropriate value of S1-S6; in S1, image migration technology can be employed (various products are known to the skilled artisan, e.g., VMware vCenter Converter™ product available from VMware, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif. 94304 USA, or the PLATESPIN® product available from Novell, Waltham, Mass. 02451, USA will carry out image migration). One or more embodiments output directives, such as, for example, “Use V Center Converter with the following parameters, and go ahead.”
In one or more embodiments, analysis is carried out by the decision logic set forth above in the portion headed “Expression of a Migration Method in Rules,” and the result is a specification saying, e.g., “this is an S1 workload.” Note that a characterization of the source and target are already in hand. At present, S1 is effectuated using VM Ware's V Center Converter. Thus, indicating to the responsible parties that there is an S1 scenario, with known source and target, is enough for them to do the job. Note that the decision logic is preferably encoded in the discovery analysis tooling. The output is, e.g., “S4,” or “S2,” or “S2 with DB2, middleware, and WAS.” An exemplary SW architecture and flow chart(s) for the decision logic are provided in
One or more embodiments make use of the DARWIN Information Typing Architecture framework, available from International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., USA, for S6 scenarios. See, e.g., co-assigned US Patent Publication 2011-0107327, May 5, 2011, of Eric J. Barkie et al., entitled “ASSISTING SERVER MIGRATION”; the complete disclosure of same is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. The configuration information is pulled from the same database that each analysis runs on top of. In some embodiments, pushing the actual S1 or S6 migration is carried out manually.
Consider now an exemplary end-to-end process, as seen in
In
In essence, the tying of configuration data to the migration approach adopted is replicated in the depicted overall structure, that is, not only is the actual per-server or per-workload method tied based on a characterization of the particular workload, but rather an analysis across all accounts is tied to their suitability for migration, against a portfolio of available approaches, to understand the viability of undertaking migration for the particular client. The foregoing represents a high-level view; when going through the process, it is seen in Phase 0 that a candidate list is developed in step 408 and account-level data is obtained in step 410. The data warehouses 412, 414 include global asset configuration data warehouse (GACDW) 412 which is an asset configuration data warehouse that maintains configuration information about servers, at various levels of detail, across accounts, as well as SRM resource utilization data 414 (SRM is a tool which monitors and/or manages system resources), which provides utilization data on servers. As seen at 416, another source of data is empirical (e.g., questionnaire) data from the client engagement. At 418, carry out fast path screening wherein the data 412, 414, 416 is analyzed, and based on the above-described characterizations (e.g., source, target, and available techniques to effectuate changes), a quick pass is made through the data to identify “low-hanging fruit,” i.e., workloads with minimal transformation requirements (by way of a non-limiting example, X86 workloads within the same data center, source environment of V Center Version 4.0, operating systems of Windows 2003 and newer, no application changes, only IP address changes). Of course, the source environment can be searched for in the database(s) 412 and/or 414 while information such as no application changes can be ascertained from the appropriate questionnaire data 416.
By way of review and clarification, data store 412 includes configuration information, data store 414 has resource utilization data, and empirical data 416 includes data from the accounts, typically a characterization of the target environment. Step 418 includes conducting an initial analysis across all of the accounts that data is available for to find viable candidates. Additional detail is shown in
If yes, proceed to customer selection at 518; engage the client at 520, and prepare an account survey questionnaire at 522. Validate the scenario results and deliverables with the client at 526, and generate the survey analysis at 524. Determine in decision block 528 if the assessment is complete. If yes, proceed to design and implementation at 532. If not, identify account-specific what-if criteria in 530 and return to steps 506 and 516. On the other hand, if step 514 yields a no, modify the what-if criteria in step 516 and proceed to step 506.
Referring again to
In step 428, approach the business or other client and present the analysis; if the client is interested, in steps 430, 432, and 434, prepare a statement of work, secure the client's signature, and proceed to VSO Phase 1 planning and design, in row 404. Row 404 includes two parallel paths, namely, a fast path for S1 and S2 cases, beginning at 436, and a non-fast path for non-fast path S1-S6 workloads, beginning at 438. In the fast path case, proceed to step 440 and develop a VSO design based on the reference architecture. In the non-fast path case, additional details may need to be teased out to accomplish, for example, middleware changes, OS upgrades, or the like, then discover application dependencies in step 442, carry out the above-discussed classification process in step 444, and so on. Once the selection of the approaches to be used has been completed, before migration can be carried out, the target infrastructure should be built (provisioned) as in Phase 2 at row 406. Using conventional techniques in Phase 2, in step 446, procure the hardware; in steps 448 and 450, configure the virtual environments; and in steps 452 and 454, prepare the system so it is ready to receive the workload(s) in step 456.
For completeness, in flow 404, note step 461, plan preparation; step 463, obtaining the decision to proceed; and step 465, infrastructure provisioning. Note also step 467, architecture development; step 469, plan preparation, and step 471, wherein the technical return on investment analysis is refined.
Phase 3 is next and has been discussed above; it includes a sequence of steps that should be followed to effectuate the migration. There will in general be Phase 3 processes for the S1 category, S2 category, S4 category, the S6 category, and so on.
One or more embodiments are applicable to cloud computing. Drivers can be developed that target a number of cloud architectures. For example, for S6, OS upgrades or cross-platform migrations such as System P to System Z, drivers can be supported for different architectures such as System P, System Z, X86, a cloud architecture, and so on. Thus, it is possible to specify the target as a certain kind of cloud and that will influence the kind of approach to be used. Some clouds have a registration capability which can be invoked based upon an initial image migration into the V center for that environment, followed by the registration. Consider the “S6” and “Registration” buttons as an example of the tooling supporting those two different options.
Note with respect to step 1122 that there are different fix-ups (as opposed to upgrades) for different middleware. Some instances use the IBM Blue Horse automation package for middleware fix up.
Given the discussion thus far, it will be appreciated that, in general terms, an exemplary method, according to an aspect of the invention, includes the step of obtaining data characterizing a source computing environment having at least one hardware resource and at least one workload. As used herein, the term “workload” is equivalent to the term “application.” In some cases, this step is carried out by a suitable discovery module executing on at least one hardware processor. A discovery module should be broadly construed in this context to cover functionality such as described with respect to elements 3104, 3242, 3244, 3248, 3246, 3208, and/or 3222. An additional step includes obtaining a specification of a target computing environment to which the at least one workload is to be migrated in a migration. In some cases, this step is carried out by a suitable target analysis module executing on the at least one hardware processor. A target analysis module should be broadly construed in this context to cover functionality such as described with respect to elements 3212, 3226, 3110, and/or 3240. Furthermore, this step broadly includes the case of changing to different versions of the applications and even to a different application entirely—say from “ACME” database to the DB2 database.
An additional step includes, based on the data characterizing the source computing environment and the specification of the target computing environment, categorizing the migration into one of a plurality of categories. In some cases, this step is carried out by a suitable rules engine module executing on the at least one hardware processor. A rules engine module should be broadly construed in this context to cover functionality such as described with respect to element 3112 and related functionality as described herein. A still further step includes specifying the migration in accordance with a migration technique selected based on the categorizing step. In some cases, this step is carried out by a suitable approach selection module executing on the at least one hardware processor. An approach selection module should be broadly construed in this context to cover functionality such as described with respect to elements 3212, 3226 and related functionality as described herein.
In some cases, the categorizing of the migration includes determining whether an operating system version upgrade is required, as in decision block 104. In some cases, the categorizing of the migration further includes determining whether at least one of a middleware upgrade and an application upgrade is required, as at 106, 108. Furthermore, in some instances, the categorizing of the migration further includes determining whether an internet protocol address change is required, as at 110.
Even further, in some cases, the categorizing of the migration even further includes categorizing the migration into a first category (e.g., S1) if the operating system version upgrade is not required, the at least one of a middleware upgrade and an application upgrade is not required, and the internet protocol address change is not required; categorizing the migration into a second category (e.g., S2 or S3) if the operating system version upgrade is not required, the at least one of a middleware upgrade and an application upgrade is not required, and the internet protocol address change is required; and, if the operating system version upgrade is not required, and the at least one of a middleware upgrade and an application upgrade is required, determining whether a new server build is required. Furthermore, if the operating system version upgrade is not required, and the at least one of a middleware upgrade and an application upgrade is required, and the new server build is not required, categorize the migration into a third category (e.g., S4 or S5). Even further, if at least one of: (i) the operating system version upgrade is not required, and the at least one of a middleware upgrade and an application upgrade is required, and the new server build is required; and (ii) the operating system version upgrade is required, categorize the migration into a fourth category (e.g., S6 or S7).
In some cases, in the step of obtaining the specification of the target computing environment, the target computing environment includes a virtualized server environment, and the step of carrying out the migration includes migrating the workloads to the virtualized server environment. See
In some instances, in the step of obtaining the specification of the target computing environment, the target computing environment is a cloud computing environment, as described with respect to
In some instances, an optional additional step includes actually carrying out the migration in accordance with the selected migration technique.
As shown in
The set of discovered data from questionnaires and discovery tooling can include, for example, operating system (OS), server, location, and similar attributes.
Thus, one or more instances select the type of migration approach based on the category (e.g., S1-S6) and apply these approaches in a systematic way to create the virtualized server or other target environment. There is appropriate linkage between the discovered data, the decision logic for the classification and the approaches used (
In some cases, an additional step includes providing a system, wherein the system includes distinct software modules. Each of the distinct software modules is embodied on a computer-readable storage medium, and the distinct software modules include a discovery module, a target analysis module, a rules engine module, and an approach selection module, as described above.
In another aspect, as per
In such instances, an additional step can include providing a system, wherein the system includes distinct software modules. Each of the distinct software modules is embodied on a computer-readable storage medium, and the distinct software modules comprise a configuration management service module (e.g., 3244), an application assessment service module (e.g., 3246), an opportunity selection service module (e.g., 3210, 3224), a data store module 3206, and a user interface module 3202. In such cases, the obtaining of the configuration data is carried out by the configuration management service module executing on at least one hardware processor; the obtaining of the application assessment data is carried out by the application assessment service module executing on the at least one hardware processor; the selecting of the search criteria is carried out by the opportunity selection service module executing on the at least one hardware processor; the displaying of the results and the obtaining of the selection are carried out by the user interface module executing on the at least one hardware processor; and the storing includes storing the target list using the data store module.
Exemplary Cloud Computing Environment
It is understood in advance that although this disclosure includes a detailed description on cloud computing, implementation of the teachings recited herein are not limited to a cloud computing environment. Rather, embodiments of the present invention are capable of being implemented in conjunction with any other type of computing environment now known or later developed. Cloud environments may correspond to source and/or target environments.
Cloud computing is a model of service delivery for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g. networks, network bandwidth, servers, processing, memory, storage, applications, virtual machines, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or interaction with a provider of the service. This cloud model may include at least five characteristics, at least three service models, and at least four deployment models.
Characteristics are as follows:
On-demand self-service: a cloud consumer can unilaterally provision computing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, as needed automatically without requiring human interaction with the service's provider.
Broad network access: capabilities are available over a network and accessed through standard mechanisms that promote use by heterogeneous thin or thick client platforms (e.g., mobile phones, laptops, and PDAs).
Resource pooling: the provider's computing resources are pooled to serve multiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physical and virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according to demand. There is a sense of location independence in that the consumer generally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of the provided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher level of abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter).
Rapid elasticity: capabilities can be rapidly and elastically provisioned, in some cases automatically, to quickly scale out and rapidly released to quickly scale in. To the consumer, the capabilities available for provisioning often appear to be unlimited and can be purchased in any quantity at any time.
Measured service: cloud systems automatically control and optimize resource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level of abstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage, processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can be monitored, controlled, and reported providing transparency for both the provider and consumer of the utilized service.
Service Models are as follows:
Software as a Service (SaaS): the capability provided to the consumer is to use the provider's applications running on a cloud infrastructure. The applications are accessible from various client devices through a thin client interface such as a web browser (e.g., web-based email). The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage, or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exception of limited user-specific application configuration settings.
Platform as a Service (PaaS): the capability provided to the consumer is to deploy onto the cloud infrastructure consumer-created or acquired applications created using programming languages and tools supported by the provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including networks, servers, operating systems, or storage, but has control over the deployed applications and possibly application hosting environment configurations.
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): the capability provided to the consumer is to provision processing, storage, networks, and other fundamental computing resources where the consumer is able to deploy and run arbitrary software, which can include operating systems and applications. The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage, deployed applications, and possibly limited control of select networking components (e.g., host firewalls).
Deployment Models are as follows:
Private cloud: the cloud infrastructure is operated solely for an organization. It may be managed by the organization or a third party and may exist on-premises or off-premises.
Community cloud: the cloud infrastructure is shared by several organizations and supports a specific community that has shared concerns (e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and compliance considerations). It may be managed by the organizations or a third party and may exist on-premises or off-premises.
Public cloud: the cloud infrastructure is made available to the general public or a large industry group and is owned by an organization selling cloud services.
Hybrid cloud: the cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or more clouds (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities but are bound together by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting for load balancing between clouds).
A cloud computing environment is service oriented with a focus on statelessness, low coupling, modularity, and semantic interoperability. At the heart of cloud computing is an infrastructure comprising a network of interconnected nodes.
Referring now to
In cloud computing node 10 there is a computer system/server 12, which is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with computer system/server 12 include, but are not limited to, personal computer systems, server computer systems, thin clients, thick clients, handheld or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframe computer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
Computer system/server 12 may be described in the general context of computer system executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer system. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and so on that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer system/server 12 may be practiced in distributed cloud computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.
As shown in
Bus 18 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.
Computer system/server 12 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by computer system/server 12, and it includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.
System memory 28 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30 and/or cache memory 32. Computer system/server 12 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 34 can be provided for reading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided. In such instances, each can be connected to bus 18 by one or more data media interfaces. As will be further depicted and described below, memory 28 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the invention.
Program/utility 40, having a set (at least one) of program modules 42, may be stored in memory 28 by way of example, and not limitation, as well as an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data or some combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networking environment. Program modules 42 generally carry out the functions and/or methodologies of embodiments of the invention as described herein.
Computer system/server 12 may also communicate with one or more external devices 14 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 24, etc.; one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computer system/server 12; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 12 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output (I/O) interfaces 22. Still yet, computer system/server 12 can communicate with one or more networks such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 20. As depicted, network adapter 20 communicates with the other components of computer system/server 12 via bus 18. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used in conjunction with computer system/server 12. Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Hardware and software layer 60 includes hardware and software components. Examples of hardware components include mainframes, in one example IBM® zSeries® systems; RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) architecture based servers, in one example IBM pSeries® systems; IBM xSeries® systems; IBM BladeCenter® systems; storage devices; networks and networking components. Examples of software components include network application server software, in one example IBM WebSphere® application server software; and database software, in one example IBM DB2® database software. (IBM, zSeries, pSeries, xSeries, BladeCenter, WebSphere, and DB2 are trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation registered in many jurisdictions worldwide).
Virtualization layer 62 provides an abstraction layer from which the following examples of virtual entities may be provided: virtual servers; virtual storage; virtual networks, including virtual private networks; virtual applications and operating systems; and virtual clients.
In one example, management layer 64 may provide the functions described below. Resource provisioning provides dynamic procurement of computing resources and other resources that are utilized to perform tasks within the cloud computing environment. Metering and Pricing provide cost tracking as resources are utilized within the cloud computing environment, and billing or invoicing for consumption of these resources. In one example, these resources may comprise application software licenses. Security provides identity verification for cloud consumers and tasks, as well as protection for data and other resources. User portal provides access to the cloud computing environment for consumers and system administrators. Service level management provides cloud computing resource allocation and management such that required service levels are met. Service Level Agreement (SLA) planning and fulfillment provide pre-arrangement for, and procurement of, cloud computing resources for which a future requirement is anticipated in accordance with an SLA.
Workloads layer 66 provides examples of functionality for which the cloud computing environment may be utilized. Examples of workloads and functions which may be provided from this layer include: mapping and navigation; software development and lifecycle management; virtual classroom education delivery; data analytics processing; transaction processing; and mobile desktop.
Exemplary System and Article of Manufacture Details
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
One or more embodiments of the invention, or elements thereof, can be implemented in the form of an apparatus including a memory and at least one processor that is coupled to the memory and operative to perform exemplary method steps.
One or more embodiments can make use of software running on a general purpose computer or workstation. With reference to
Accordingly, computer software including instructions or code for performing the methodologies of the invention, as described herein, may be stored in one or more of the associated memory devices (for example, ROM, fixed or removable memory) and, when ready to be utilized, loaded in part or in whole (for example, into RAM) and implemented by a CPU. Such software could include, but is not limited to, firmware, resident software, microcode, and the like.
A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor 16 coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements 28 through a system bus 18. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual implementation of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories 32 which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during implementation.
Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, and the like) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
Network adapters 20 may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
As used herein, including the claims, a “server” per se includes a physical data processing system (for example, system 12 as shown in
As noted, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon. Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. Scripting languages such as Perl and PHP can be used in one or more embodiments. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
It should be noted that any of the methods described herein can include an additional step of providing a system comprising distinct software modules embodied on a computer readable storage medium; the modules can include, for example, any or all of the elements depicted in the block diagrams and/or described herein; by way of example and not limitation, any or the modules or sub-modules depicted in
In any case, it should be understood that the components illustrated herein may be implemented in various forms of hardware, software, or combinations thereof; for example, application specific integrated circuit(s) (ASICS), functional circuitry, one or more appropriately programmed general purpose digital computers with associated memory, and the like. Given the teachings of the invention provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the related art will be able to contemplate other implementations of the components of the invention.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/416,366 filed on Nov. 23, 2010, and entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE SYSTEMATIC MIGRATION OF WORKLOAD TO BASED ON S1-S6 CLASSIFICATION.” The disclosure of the aforementioned Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/416,366 is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100293168 | Gupta | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100318608 | Huang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110107327 | Barkie | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270968 | Salsburg et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Deng et al., “Toward Middleware-based Online Application Migration”, 2009, IEEE, pp. 222-227. |
| William Witman, “Oracle Fusion Middleware Autonomy Search Integration Sample Guide for Oracle WebLogic Portal”, Feb. 2010, Oracle Corporation, 72 pages. |
| P.Mell & T. Grance. “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing” Version 15, Oct. 7, 2009. |
| “Oracle Exalogic Architecture Service”. Oracle, 2010. |
| “PlateSpin® Migrate” downloaded from http://wwvv.novell.com/products/migrate/ on Mar. 15, 2011. |
| SLPK,downloaded http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/menuitem.863c3e4cbcdc3f3515b49c108973a801/?ciid=0508edaa22f02110edaa22f02110275d6e10RCRD on Mar. 15, 2011. |
| “Migration of Data with LSMW” downloaded Mar. 15, 2011 from http://help.sap.com/saphelp—nw04s/helpdata/en/87/f3ae74e68111d1b3ff006094b944c8/content.htm. |
| “Documentation for Bluehorse” downloaded May 5, 2011 fromhttp://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v45r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.tivoli.tpm.apk.doc/Bluehorse—package.html. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120131567 A1 | May 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61416366 | Nov 2010 | US |
