The present invention relates to a microbubble generation device and a system for selectively lysing cells by cavitating microbubbles.
Gynoid lipodystrophy is a localized metabolic disorder of the subcutaneous tissue which leads to an alteration in the topography of the cutaneous surface (skin), or a dimpling effect caused by increased fluid retention and/or proliferation of adipose tissue in certain subdermal regions. This condition, commonly known as cellulite, affects over 90% of post-pubescent women, and some men. Cellulite commonly appears on the hips, buttocks and legs, but is not necessarily caused by being overweight, as is a common perception. Cellulite is formed in the subcutaneous level of tissue below the epidermis and dermis layers. In this region, fat cells are arranged in chambers surrounded by bands of connective tissue called septae. As water is retained, fat cells held within the perimeters defined by these fibrous septae expand and stretch the septae and surrounding connective tissue. Furthermore, adipocyte expansion from weight gain may also stretch the septae. Eventually this connective tissue contracts and hardens (scleroses) holding the skin at a non-flexible length, while the chambers between the septae continue to expand with weight gain, or water gain. This results in areas of the skin being held down while other sections bulge outward, resulting in the lumpy, “orange peel” or “cottage cheese” appearance on the skin surface.
Even though obesity is not considered to be a root cause of cellulite, it can certainly worsen the dimpled appearance of a cellulitic region due to the increased number of fat cells in the region. Traditional fat extraction techniques such as liposuction that target deep fat and larger regions of the anatomy, can sometimes worsen the appearance of cellulite since the subdermal fat pockets remain and are accentuated by the loss of underlying bulk (deep fat) in the region. Many times liposuction is performed and patients still seek therapy for remaining skin irregularities, such as cellulite.
A variety of approaches for treatment of skin irregularities such as cellulite and removal of unwanted adipose tissue have been proposed. For example, methods and devices that provide mechanical massage to the affected area, through either a combination of suction and massage or suction, massage and application of energy, in addition to application of various topical agents are currently available. Developed in the 1950's, mesotherapy is the injection of various treatment solutions through the skin that has been widely used in Europe for conditions ranging from sports injuries to chronic pain, to cosmetic procedures to treat wrinkles and cellulite. The treatment consists of the injection or transfer of various agents through the skin to provide increased circulation and the potential for fat oxidation, such as aminophylline, hyaluronic acid, novocaine, plant extracts and other vitamins. The treatment entitled Acthyderm (Tumwood International, Ontario, Canada) employs a roller system that electroporates the stratum corneum to open small channels in the dermis, followed by the application of various mesotherapy agents, such as vitamins, antifibrotics, lypolitics, anti-inflammatories and the like.
Massage techniques that improve lymphatic drainage were tried as early as the 1930's. Mechanical massage devices, or Pressotherapy, have also been developed such as the “Endermologie” device (LPG Systems, France), the “Synergie” device (Dynatronics, Salt Lake City, Utah) and the “Silklight” device (Lumenis, Tel Aviv, Israel), all utilizing subdermal massage via vacuum and mechanical rollers. Other approaches have included a variety of energy sources, such as Cynosure's “TriActive” device (Cynosure, Westford, Mass.) utilizing a pulsed semiconductor laser in addition to mechanical massage, and the “Cellulux” device (Palomar Medical, Burlington, Mass.) which emits infrared light through a cooled chiller to target subcutaneous adipose tissue. The “VelaSmooth” system (Syneron, Inc., Yokneam Illit, Israel) employs bipolar radiofrequency energy in conjunction with suction to increase metabolism in adipose tissue, and the “Thermacool” device (Thermage, Inc., Hayward, Calif.) utilizes radiofrequency energy to shrink the subdermal fibrous septae to treat wrinkles and other skin defects. Other energy based therapies such as electrolipophoresis, using several pairs of needles to apply a low frequency interstitial electromagnetic field to aid circulatory drainage have also been developed. Similarly, non-invasive ultrasound is used in the “Dermosonic” device (Symedex Medical, Minneapolis, Minn.) to promote reabsorption and drainage of retained fluids and toxins.
Another approach to the treatment of skin irregularities such as scarring and dimpling is a technique called subcision. This technique involves the insertion of a relatively large gauge needle subdermally in the region of dimpling or scarring, and then mechanically manipulating the needle below the skin to break up the fibrous septae in the subdermal region. In at least one known method of subcision, a local anesthetic is injected into the targeted region, and an 18 gauge needle is inserted 10-20 mm below the cutaneous surface. The needle is then directed parallel to the epidermis to create a dissection plane beneath the skin to essentially tear through, or “free up” the tightened septae causing the dimpling or scarring. Pressure is then applied to control bleeding acutely, and then by the use of compressive clothing following the procedure. While clinically effective in some patients, pain, bruising, bleeding and scarring can result. The known art also describes a laterally deployed cutting mechanism for subcision, and a technique employing an ultrasonically assisted subcision technique.
Certain other techniques known as liposuction, tumescent liposuction, lypolosis and the like, target adipose tissue in the subdermal and deep fat regions of the body. These techniques may include also removing the fat cells once they are disrupted, or leaving them to be resorbed by the body's immune/lymphatic system. Traditional liposuction includes the use of a surgical cannula placed at the site of the fat to be removed, and then the use of an infusion of fluids and mechanical motion of the cannula to break up the fatty tissue, and suction to “vacuum” the disrupted fatty tissue directly out of the patient.
The “Lysonix” system (Mentor Corporation, Santa Barbara, Calif.) utilizes an ultrasonic transducer on the handpiece of the suction cannula to assist in tissue disruption (by cavitation of the tissue at the targeted site). Liposonix (Bothell, Wash.) and Ultrashape (TelAviv, Israel) employ the use of focused ultrasound to destroy adipose tissue noninvasively. In addition, cryogenic cooling has been proposed for destroying adipose tissue. A variation on the traditional liposuction technique known as tumescent liposuction was introduced in 1985 and is currently considered by some to be the standard of care in the United States. It involves the infusion of tumescent fluids to the targeted region prior to mechanical disruption and removal by the suction cannula. The fluids may help to ease the pain of the mechanical disruption, while also swelling the tissues making them more susceptible to mechanical removal. Various combinations of fluids may be employed in the tumescent solution including a local anesthetic such as lidocaine, a vasoconstrictive agent such as epinephrine, saline, potassium and the like. The benefits of such an approach are detailed in the articles, “Laboratory and Histopathologic Comparative Study of Internal Ultrasound-Assisted Lipoplasty and Tumescent Lipoplasty” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sep. 15, (2002) 110:4, 1158-1164, and “When One Liter Does Not Equal 1000 Milliliters: Implications for the Tumescent Technique” Dermatol. Surg. (2000) 26: 1024-1028, the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Various other approaches employing dermatologic creams, lotions, vitamins and herbal supplements have also been proposed to treat cellulite. Private spas and salons offer cellulite massage treatments that include body scrubs, pressure point massage, essential oils, and herbal products using extracts from plant species such as seaweed, horsetail and clematis and ivy have also been proposed. Although a multitude of therapies exist, most of them do not provide a lasting effect on the skin irregularity, and for some, one therapy may cause the worsening of another (as in the case of liposuction causing scarring or a more pronounced appearance of cellulite). Yet other treatments for cellulite have negative side effects that limit their adoption. Most therapies require multiple treatments on an ongoing basis to maintain their effect at significant expense and with mixed results.
Medical ultrasound apparatus and methods are generally of two different types. One type of medical ultrasound wave generating device known in the art is that which provides high intensity focused ultrasound or high acoustic pressure ultrasound for tissue treatment, for example for tumor destruction. High intensity or high acoustic pressure ultrasound is capable of providing direct tissue destruction. High intensity or high acoustic pressure ultrasound is most commonly focused at a point in order to concentrate the energy from the generated acoustic waves in a relatively small focus of tissue. However, another type of medical ultrasound is a lower intensity and less focused type of ultrasound that is used for diagnostic imaging and physical therapy applications. Low acoustic pressure ultrasound is commonly used, for example, for cardiac imaging and fetal imaging. Low acoustic pressure ultrasound may be used for tissue warning, without tissue disruption, in physical therapy applications. Low acoustic pressure ultrasound, using power ranges for diagnostic imaging, generally will not cause any significant tissue disruption when used for limited periods of time in the absence of certain enhancing agents.
Methods and apparatus of using high intensity focused ultrasound to disrupt subcutaneous tissues directly has been described in the known art. Such techniques may utilize a high intensity ultrasound wave that is focused on a tissue within the body, thereby causing a localized destruction or injury to cells. The focusing of the high intensity ultrasound may be achieved utilizing, for example, a concave transducer or an acoustic lens. Use of high intensity focused ultrasound to disrupt fat, sometimes in combination with removal of the fat by liposuction, has been described in the known prior art. Such use of high intensity focused ultrasound should be distinguished from the low acoustic pressure ultrasound.
In light of the foregoing, it would be desirable to provide methods and apparatus for treating skin irregularities such as cellulite and to provide a sustained aesthetic result to a body region, such as the face, neck, arms, legs, thighs, buttocks, breasts, stomach and other targeted regions which are minimally or non-invasive. It would also be desirable to provide methods and apparatus for treating skin irregularities that enhance prior techniques and make them less invasive and subject to fewer side effects.
Therefore, there has been recognized by those skilled in the art a need for an apparatus and method for the use of low intensity ultrasound to treat subcutaneous tissues. Use of low intensity ultrasound, in the power ranges of diagnostic ultrasound, would be safer to use, have fewer side effects, and could be used with less training. The present invention fulfills these needs and others.
Disclosed is a device for generating microbubbles in a gas and liquid mixture and injection device, which includes a housing defining a mixing chamber; means for mixing solution contained in the mixing chamber to generate microbubbles in the solution; and a needle array removably attached to the housing and in fluid connection with the mixing chamber, the needle array including at least one needle.
The mixing chamber may include a first mixing chamber m fluid communication with a second mixing chamber. Moreover, the mixing means may include means for expressing a solution of fluid and gas between the first and second mixing chambers to generate microbubbles in the solution.
The device may further include a fluid reservoir in fluid connection with at least one of the first and second mixing chambers; and a source of gas in fluid connection with at least one of the first and second mixing chambers. Optionally, the fluid reservoir and/or the mixing chamber(s) may be thermally insulated and/or include means for maintaining the fluid at a predetermined temperature. Still further, the source of gas may be room air, or may include air, oxygen, carbon dioxide, perfluoropropane or the like which may be maintained at greater than atmospheric pressure.
The solution expressing means may include first and second pistons mounted for reciprocation within the first and second mixing chambers.
Still further, the device may include means for reciprocating the first and second pistons to express fluid and gas between the first and second cylinders to create a microbubble solution. The reciprocating means may be a source of compressed air; and the first and second cylinders may be pneumatic cylinders.
The device may include a needle deployment mechanism operably connected to the needle array for deploying the at least one needle(s) between a retracted and an extended position. The needle array may include at least two needles and the needle deployment mechanism selectively deploys one or more of the at least two needles between the retracted and the extended position. Still further, the needle deployment mechanism may include at least one of a pneumatic piston, an electric motor, and a spring.
The device may include at least one pressure sensor for measuring tissue apposition pressure. The sensor may be provided on either or both of the housing and the needle array. Deployment of the at least one needle may be inhibited if a measured apposition pressure values falls beneath an initial threshold value or exceeds a secondary threshold value. The device may include two or more sensors wherein deployment of the at least one needle is inhibited if a difference in measured apposition pressure values between any two sensors exceeds a threshold value.
The aforementioned mixing means may include at least one of a blade, paddle, whisk, and semi-permeable membrane positioned within the mixing chamber. The mixing means may further include one of a motor and a pneumatic source operably coupled to the at least one of a blade, paddle, whisk, and semi-permeable membrane.
The device of the present invention may include tissue apposition means for pulling the needle array into apposition with tissue. The tissue apposition means may include at least one vacuum orifice defined in at least one of the housing and the needle array, whereby the vacuum orifice transmits suction from a source of partial vacuum to tissue bringing the needle array into apposition with the tissue. The vacuum orifice may be formed in the needle array, and the at least one needle may be positioned within the vacuum orifice. Still further, the vacuum orifice may define a receptacle, whereby tissue is pulled at least partially into the receptacle when the vacuum orifice transmits suction from the source of partial vacuum.
In some embodiments, the needle array includes a tissue apposition surface; and the tissue apposition means further includes at least one flange mounted on the tissue apposition surface and surrounding the vacuum orifice.
The device of the present invention may include means for adjusting a needle insertion depth of the at least one needle. The needle array may include at least two needles and the insertion depth adjustment means may individually adjust the insertion depth of each needle. In one embodiment, the needle insertion depth adjustment means may include a plurality of discrete needle adjustment depths. Alternatively, the needle insertion depth adjustment means provides continuous adjustment of the needle adjustment depth. Still further, the needle insertion depth adjustment means may include a readout and/or a display indicative of the needle adjustment depth.
According to one embodiment, the needle array includes a tissue apposition surface; and the at least one needle includes a distal end, the at least one needle being moveable between a retracted position in which the distal end of the needle is maintained beneath the tissue apposition surface and an extended position in which the distal end of the needle extends beyond the tissue apposition surface.
According to one embodiment an ultrasound transducer is operably connected to one of the needle array, the housing and the at least one needle.
According to one aspect, the needle array may generally surround the ultrasound transducer. Alternatively, the ultrasound transducer may generally surround the needle array. Moreover, the ultrasound transducer may be integrally formed with the needle array.
The device may further include a fluid pressurization mechanism m fluid communication with the at least one needle.
Still further, the device may include means for controlling a volume and pressure of fluid dispensed from the fluid reservoir into the mixing chamber. Moreover the device may include means for controlling the volume, pressure, and rate at which fluid or solution is injected into the tissue.
A machine readable identifier may be provided on the needle array. The identifier may be used to uniquely identify the ultrasound transducer, needle array and/or characteristics of the needle array.
According to one embodiment, the device includes a machine readable identifier on the needle array and means for reading the identifier operably connected to the needle deployment mechanism. Optionally, the needle deployment mechanism inhibits deployment of the at least one needle unless the identifier reading means authenticates the identifier. Moreover, the needle deployment mechanism may optionally accumulate the number of times the needle array associated with a given identifier is deployed and inhibit deployment of the at least one needle if the accumulated number needle deployments associated with the identifier exceeds a predetermined value.
According to one embodiment, the device includes a machine readable identifier on the needle array and means for reading the identifier operably connected to the fluid pressurization mechanism, wherein the fluid pressurization mechanism adjusts the fluid injection pressure in response to information read from the identifier.
Also disclosed is a system comprising, a container containing a measured amount of a solution including at least one of a vasoconstrictor, a surfactant, and an anesthetic, the solution comprising a liquid and at least one of a gas and a fluid; a needle array in fluid connection with the container, the needle array including at least one needle. The gas is at least partially dissolved and may be fully dissolved in the fluid. Optionally, the solution container is enclosed, and the solution is maintained at greater than atmospheric pressure.
The aforementioned system may include an ultrasound transducer apparatus capable of operating in at least one of first, second, third, and fourth energy settings, wherein the first energy setting is selected to facilitate the absorption of solution by the tissue, the second energy setting is selected to facilitate stable cavitation, the third energy setting is selected to facilitate transient cavitation, and the fourth energy setting is selected to facilitate pushing bubbles within tissue. The transducer apparatus may include first and second transducers, wherein the first transducer facilitates popping of bubbles and the second transducer facilitates bringing dissolved gas out of solution. According to one embodiment, the transducer apparatus produces at least one of unfocussed and defocused ultrasound waves.
Also disclosed is a method for selectively lysing cells, comprising: percutaneously injecting a solution including at least one of a vasoconstrictor, a surfactant, and an anesthetic into subcutaneous tissue, insonating the tissue with ultrasound setting to distribute the solution by acoustic radiation force; and insonating the tissue at a second ultrasound setting to induce cell uptake of the solution and thereby lyse the cells.
Also disclosed is a method for selectively lysing cells, comprising: percutaneously injecting a microbubble solution into subcutaneous tissue; insonating the tissue at a first ultrasound setting to distribute the solution and push the microbubble against walls of the cells by acoustic radiation force; and insonating the tissue at a second ultrasound setting to induce transient cavitation. The solution may include at least one of a vasoconstrictor, a surfactant, and an anesthetic.
Also disclosed is a method for selectively lysing cells, comprising: percutaneously injecting a solution into subcutaneous tissue, the solution containing at least one of a dissolved gas and a partially dissolved gas; insonating the tissue to induce stable cavitation and generate microbubbles; insonating the tissue with ultrasound to distribute the solution and push the microbubble against walls of the cells by acoustic radiation force; insonating the tissue with ultrasound to induce transient cavitation. The solution may include at least one of a vasoconstrictor, a surfactant, and an anesthetic.
Each of the aforementioned embodiments may include a needle or needles having a texture encouraging the creation of micro bubbles.
Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be more apparent from the accompanying drawings and the following detailed description, in which:
One aspect of the present invention relates to a device for generating a microbubble solution and for a system using the device to selectively lyse tissue.
According to a first embodiment of the invention the microbubble solution includes a fluid or mixture containing one or more of the following: active bubbles, partially dissolved bubbles, a saturated or supersaturated liquid containing fully dissolved bubbles or a material/chemical which generates bubbles in situ. The bubbles may be encapsulated within a lipid or the like, or may be unencapsulated (free) bubbles.
Active bubbles refer to gaseous or vapor bubbles which may include encapsulated gas or unencapsulated gas. These active bubbles may or may not be visible to the naked eye. Dissolved bubbles refer to gas which has dissolved into the liquid at a given pressure and temperature but which will come out of solution when the temperature and/or pressure of the solution changes or in response to ultrasound insonation. The microbubbles may come out of solution in situ, i.e., after the solution is injected into the tissue. This may, for example, occur when the solution reaches the temperature of the tissue or when the tissue is subjected to ultrasound insonation. Alternatively, the microbubble may come out of solution before the solution is injected into the tissue when reaching atmospheric pressure. Thus, the bubbles may come out of solution before or after the solution is injected into the tissue.
As noted, the solution includes a liquid (fluid) and a gas which may or may not be dissolved in the liquid. By manner of illustration, the liquid portion of enhancing agent may include an aqueous solution, isotonic saline, normal saline, hypotonic saline, hypotonic solution, or a hypertonic solution. The solution may optionally include one or more additives/agents to raise the pH (e.g., sodium bicarbonate) or a buffering agent such as known in the art. By manner of illustration the gaseous portion of the solution may include air drawn from the room (“room air” or “ambient air”), oxygen, carbon dioxide, perfluoropropane, argon, hydrogen, or a mixture of one or more of these gases. However, the invention is not limited to any particular gas. There are a number of candidate gas and liquid combinations, the primary limitation being that both the gas and the liquid must be biocompatible, and the gas must be compatible with the liquid.
According to a presently preferred embodiment the liquid portion of the microbubble solution includes hypotonic buffered saline and the gaseous portion includes air.
It should be noted that the biocompatibility of overall solution depends on a variety of factors including the biocompatibility of the liquid and gas, the ratio of gas to liquid, and the size of the micro bubbles. If the micro bubbles are too large they may not reach the target tissue. Moreover, if the bubbles are too small they may go into solution before they can be used therapeutically. As will be explained in further detail below, the microbubble solution of the present invention may include a distribution of different sized microbubbles. Thus it is anticipated that the solution may contain at least some microbubbles which are too small to be therapeutically useful as well as some which are larger than the ideal size. It is anticipated that a filter, filtering mechanism or the like may be provided to ensure that bubbles larger than a threshold size are not injected into the tissue.
It should further be appreciated that “biocompatible” is a relative term in that living tissue may tolerate a small amount of a substance whereas a large amount of the same substance may be toxic with both dose and dosage as considerations. Thus, the biocompatibility of the microbubble solution of the present invention should be interpreted in relation to the amount of solution being infused, the size of the microbubbles, and the ratio of gas to liquid. Moreover, since selective cell lysis is one of the objects of the present invention, the term biocompatible should be understood to include a mixture or solution which may result in localized cell lysis alone or in conjunction with ultrasound insonation.
The microbubble solution according to the present invention may include one or more additives such as a surfactant to stabilize the microbubbles, a local anesthetic, a vasodilator, and a vasoconstrictor. By manner of illustration the local anesthetic may be lidocaine and the vasoconstrictor may be epinephrine. Table 1 is a non-exclusive list of other vasoconstrictors which may be included in the micro bubble solution of the present invention. Table 2 is a non-exclusive list of other local anesthetics which may be included in the micro bubble solution of the present invention. Table 3 is a non-exclusive list of gaseous anesthetics which may be included in the gaseous portion of the solution of the present invention. Table 4 is a non-exclusive list of surfactants which may be included in the solution of the present invention.
The enhancing solution may further include a buffering agent such as sodium bicarbonate. Table 5 is a non-exclusive list of buffers which may be included in the solution of the present invention.
It should be noted that like reference numerals are intended to identify like parts of the invention, and that dashed lines are intended to represent optional components.
The device 100 may include a fluid metering device 124 (shown in dashed lines) controlling the amount of fluid dispensed into the bubble generator 106 and/or a fluid metering device 126 (shown in dashed lines) controlling the amount of micro bubble solution to be injected into the tissue. The device 100 may further include a gas metering device 128 (shown in dashed lines) used to control the amount of gas dispensed into the bubble generator 106. The device 100 depicted in
One or more of the cylinder(s) 116 may be provided with a reciprocating piston 120 driven by an external power source 122 such as a source of compressed air, spring, elastomeric member, motor, stepper motor or the like. According to one embodiment, the reciprocating piston 120 is a pneumatic piston manufactured by the Bimba Corporation.
Liquid from the liquid reservoir 102 may be pushed into the bubble generator 106 under positive pressure from an external pressurization source 110 (shown in dashed lines); it can be drawn into the bubble generator 106 under partial pressure which may for example be generated by the reciprocating piston 120; or it can flow into the generator 106 under gravity. Similarly, gas from the gas reservoir 104 may be pushed into the bubble generator 106 under positive pressure from an external pressurization source 112 (shown in dashed lines) or it can be drawn into the bubble generator 106 under partial pressure. As will be described below, the piston 120 may also serve a dual purpose as a fluid pressurization mechanism for injecting the fluid into the tissue.
The bubble generator 106 may or may not be pressurized to enhance the saturation of the gas in the solution or prevent dissolved gas from coming out of solution. An optional fluid pressurization mechanism 110 (shown in dashed lines) may be used to maintain the fluid at a desired pressurization. As will be described in further detail below, the fluid may be chilled to further enhance solubility/saturation of the gas in the solution.
The fluid in the reservoir 102 may be at ambient temperature. Alternatively, the fluid may be chilled slightly to enhance gas solubility (super saturation). The fluid reservoir 102 may be thermally insulated to maintain the fluid at its present temperature and/or the fluid reservoir 102 may include a heating/cooling mechanism (not illustrated) to maintain the fluid at a predetermined temperature.
If the gas used is air then the gas reservoir 104 may be eliminated in favor of simply drawing air from the environment, i.e., the room housing the device 100 (“room air”). If room air is used, the device 100 may include an air filter 114 (shown in dashed lines) such as a HEPA filter or the like.
The fluid injection device 202 may include a needle array 214 which may include one or more needles 218. Alternatively, the fluid injection device 202 may, for example, include one or more hypodermic syringes.
The fluid injection device 202 further includes or is operably connected to a fluid pressurization mechanism 110 for pushing the solution into the tissue. As noted above, the piston 120 or the like used to express fluid between the cylinders 116 may serve as the fluid pressurization mechanism 210.
One or more of the components collectively termed system 200 may be combined. For example the fluid injection device 202 may be integrated as a single component with the ultrasound transducer apparatus 204 and/or the fluid injection control unit 210. Likewise, the ultrasound control unit 208 can be integrated as a single component with the ultrasound generator 206. Such integration of components is contemplated and falls within the scope of the present invention.
The fluid injection control unit 210 may control the amount of fluid and gas dispensed into the bubble generator 106 and/or the amount of solution injected into the tissue. Optionally, the control unit 210 may be interfaced directly or indirectly with the fluid metering device(s) 124, 126 and the gas metering device 128. The fluid injection control unit 210 may control the mixing or agitation (if any) of the solution within the bubble generator 106. The fluid injection control unit 210 may control the injection of solution into the tissue 220 by the injection device 202, including the deployment of a needle array 214, the depth to which the needle array 214 is deployed, and the amount of solution injected.
The fluid injection control unit 210 may control the individual deployment and retraction of one more needles (or hypodermic syringes) of the needle array 214. Thus, the control unit 210 may deploy or retract the needles 218 (or hypodermic syringes) one at a time, may deploy or retract two or more needles 218 at a time, or may deploy or retract all of the needles simultaneously.
Additionally, the fluid injection control unit 210 may individually control the amount of solution delivered to each needle 218. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that there are many ways to control the amount of solution delivered to each needle 218. For example, it may be desirable to deliver more solution in the center of the treatment area and less to the peripheral portion of the treatment area or vice-versa.
If the injection device 202 utilizes hypodermic syringes, then the fluid injection control unit 210 may control the amount of fluid distributed to each syringe. As noted above it may be desirable to provide differing amounts of solution to different areas of the treatment area, and this may be achieved by varying the amount of solution in each syringe.
As best seen in
One or more flow control devices 222 may be provided in the fluid pathway 212 to enable individualized control of the amount of fluid dispensed to each of the needles or syringes 218. The manifold 212 alone or in combination with the flow control devices 222 controls the distribution of the micro bubble solution among the needles 218. The manifold 212 may be configured to deliver a uniform amount of solution to each of the needles 218 (or hypodermic syringes), or it may be configured to deliver differing amounts of solution to different needles 218. The flow control devices 222 may be manually adjustable and/or may be controlled by the injection control unit 210. An alternate embodiment may include infinitely variable volume control at each needle or hypodermic through active means, such as with an electronic flow meter and controller.
It may be desirable to deploy all of the needles 218 simultaneously into the tissue but deliver solution to one or more needles 218 individually. For example, it may be desirable to deliver solution sequentially to groups of one or more needles 218. If needles 218 are deployed individually or in groups of two or more it may be desirable to deliver solution only to the deployed needles 218.
As will be explained below, the injection depth may be manually determined by selecting an appropriate needle length or setting a desired injection depth.
The needle deployment mechanism 216 (
There are several broad approaches for adjusting the injection depth which may be utilized. One way to adjust the injection depth is to provide needle arrays 214 of varying length needles. According to this embodiment, the user simply selects an array 214 having shorter/longer needles 218 to achieve a desired injection depth. Moreover, the different length needles 218 may be used within a given array 214.
According to another approach, the needle array 214 is displaced vertically in order to adjust the injection depth.
According to one embodiment, the injection depth may be continuously adjusted within a given range of injection depths. For example, the user may be able to continually adjust the injection depth between 5 and 12 millimeters by rotating the needle array 214. According to an alternate embodiment, the injection depth may be adjusted in discrete intervals. For example, the user may be able to adjust the injection depth between 3 and 15 millimeters in 1 millimeter increments. In yet another embodiment, the needle depth may be controlled electronically whereby the user enters a specified depth on the control unit 210.
The injection depth adjustment described above may specify the injection depth for the entire needle array 214. However, according to yet another approach it may be desirable to facilitate the individualized adjustment of one or more needles 218 of the needle array 214. The needle deployment mechanism 216 may allow for the independent adjustment of the injection depth for one or more of the needles 218 or syringes.
One or more of the needles 218 or syringes may be displaced vertically in order to adjust the injection depth of individual needles. The adjustment of the injection depth (vertical needle displacement) may be continuous or in discrete intervals, and may be manual or may be adjusted via the injection control unit 210.
As noted above, the injection depth may be adjusted by providing mating screw threads 246 to dial in the desired injection depth (
Yet another approach to individualized injection depth control is to deploy individual needles or syringes 218 as opposed to deploying the entire needle array 214. The injection control unit 210 or needle deployment mechanism 216 selects the injection depth of each individual needle or syringe 218 (
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that there are many other ways to implement the adjustment of the injection depth. The invention is not limited to the embodiments depicted in the drawings.
The needle deployment mechanism 216 deploys the needles 218 in response to a signal from the fluid injection control unit 210. The deployment mechanism 216 may include a spring, pneumatic ram, or the like which deploys the needles 218 with sufficient force to penetrate the tissue 220. The fluid injection control unit 210 synchronizes the deployment mechanism 216 with the injection of the micro bubble solution into the tissue.
A predetermined amount of the solution may be injected at a single injection depth. Alternatively, the fluid injection control unit 210 in synchronism with the deployment mechanism 216 may inject solution at each of plural injection depths, or may inject continuously as the needle array 214 on either the forward (penetration) or rearward (withdrawal) strokes. It may be desirable to deploy the needles to a first depth within the tissue and then retract the needles to a slightly shallower injection depth before injecting the solution.
The embodiment depicted in
Depending on the characteristics of the tissue undergoing treatment the user may find that needle 218 is preferable over needle 218A or vice versa. Reference to the needles 218 should be understood to refer generally to both the needles 218 (
As shown in
According to some embodiments of the invention it may be desirable for the needle deployment mechanism 216 to ultrasonically vibrate one or more of the needles 218. This feature may facilitate tissue penetration and/or bringing dissolved gas out of solution. For example, an ultrasound transducer 258 may be operably coupled to the needles 218 and/or the needle array 214. The ultrasound transducer 258 is shown for the sake of convenience in
As best seen in
In one embodiment, the fluid injection device 202 includes needle deployment mechanism 216 for moving the hypodermic needle 218 from a fully retracted position (
As shown in
In some embodiments it may be desirable to provide a one-to-one relationship between needles 218 and vacuum ports 228. Moreover, the needle(s) 218 may be positioned within the vacuum port(s) 228. The vacuum port 228 may define a recess or receptacle 229 such that the tissue 220 is at least partially pulled (sucked) into the recess 229 by the vacuum force. Moreover, the needles 218 may be at least partially housed within and deployed through the recess 229.
An optional flange 232 (show in dashed lines) may surround (skirt) the periphery of the needles 218 (or 218A) to channel/contain the suction force. Alternatively, a separate flange 232A may surround (skirt) each of the needles 218 (or 218A) to channel/contain the suction force.
It may be desirable to have one or more vacuum ports 228 spaced along a periphery of the apposition surface 226A. Moreover, it may be desirable to include a central portion apposition surface 226A, which does not include any vacuum ports 228 (no suction zone). Alternatively, it may be desirable to have vacuum ports confined to a central portion of the apposition surface 226A.
It should be appreciated that the liquid reservoir 102 and gas reservoir 104, in each of the aforementioned embodiments may be replaced with a cartridge 132 (
The cartridge 106A includes a headspace 136, which is bounded between a top inner surface 138 and a gas-liquid interface 140. The pod 134 includes a similar headspace 142, which is bounded between a top inner surface 144 and a gas-liquid interface 146.
The pod 134 includes a small opening or orifice 148, which enables the pressure within the headspace 136 of the cartridge 106A to reach equilibrium with the pressure within the headspace 142 of the pod 134. When a seal 150 of the cartridge 106A is pierced the pressure within the headspace 136 rapidly reaches equilibrium with the ambient pressure. In the moments after seal 150 is pierced the pressure within the pod 134 is greater than the pressure in the headspace 136 of the cartridge 106A because the orifice 148 restricts the rate of flow of solution out of the pod 134. A jet of solution forcefully streams out of the orifice 148 into the solution within the cartridge 106A, which agitates and/or shears the solution within the cartridge causing some of the dissolved bubbles to come out of solution thereby generating microbubbles in the solution.
The pod 134 is preferably situated at or near the bottom of the cartridge 106A such that the orifice 148 is maintained below the liquid gas interface 140.
The microbubble generator 106 may be mounted on (integrated with) the fluid injection device 202 thereby minimizing the distance that the solution travels before being injected into the tissue. The liquid reservoir 102 and gas reservoir 104 (if provided) may be removably connected to the micro bubble generator 106 as needed to generate microbubble solution. The injection device 202 may be manually supported by the operator. Alternatively, the injection device 202 may be supported on an arm 302 (
According to one embodiment the system of the invention includes a container which may be an enclosed or sealed cartridge 106A or it may be an open container. If the container is sealed it includes a measured amount of a solution. Obviously, if the container is not sealed then solution may be freely added as needed.
The system includes a needle array including at least one needle. The needle array 214 being in fluid connection with the container.
The solution includes any of the solutions disclosed herein. The solution includes a liquid. The solution may further include a gas which may be partially or fully dissolved within the solution.
The container may be enclosed and the solution may be maintained at greater than atmospheric pressure.
The needle array 214 includes at least one needle 218 which may be any of the needles disclosed herein.
The aforementioned gas may include one or more gases selected from the group of air, oxygen, carbon dioxide, carbon dioxide, perfluoropropane, argon, hydrogen, Halothane, Desflurane, Sevoflurane, Isoflurane, and Enflurane.
The solution may include one or more of a vasoconstrictor, a surfactant, and an anesthetic. Moreover, the vasoconstrictor may include one or more of Norepinephrine, Epinephrine, Angiotensin II, Vasopressin and Endothelin.
Optionally, the system may include refrigeration means for maintaining the container at a predefined temperature range. Moreover, the container may be thermally insulated.
The system may further include an ultrasound transducer apparatus 204 for transmitting ultrasound waves to the tissue. Preferably, the transducer apparatus 204 is operated in synchronism with the injection of solution into the tissue.
The transducer apparatus 204 may transmit ultrasound energy at a first setting to facilitate the distribution, absorption and/or uptake of solution by the tissue, i.e., sonoporation.
Ultrasound parameters that enhance the distribution of the solution include those conditions which create microstreaming, such as large duty cycle pulsed ultrasound (>10% duty cycle) or continuous wave ultrasound at a range of frequencies from 500 kHz to 15 MHz, focused or unfocused, and a mechanical index less than 4. According to one embodiment the mechanical index (MI) falls within the range 0.5≦MI≦4. According to another embodiment the mechanical index falls within the range 0.5≦MI≦1.9.
Sonoporation leading to increased absorption and/or uptake of the solution in the tissue can be generated by pulsed wave or continuous wave ultrasound, at a range of frequencies from 500 kHz to 15 MHz, focused or unfocused and medium to high mechanical index (MI>1.0). The preferred embodiment is pulsed wave ultrasound at a frequency of 500 kHz, unfocused, with high mechanical index (MI>1.9) in order to reproducibly create pores that are temporary or longer lasting pores.
The transducer apparatus 204 may transmit ultrasound energy at a second setting to facilitate the generation of bubbles by bringing dissolved gas out of solution, i.e., stable cavitation.
Ultrasound parameters for stable cavitation such as large duty cycle pulsed ultrasound (>10% duty cycle) or continuous wave ultrasound at a range of frequencies from 2 MHz to 15 MHz, focused or unfocused, and a mechanical index (MI) 0.05≦MI≦2.0.
The transducer apparatus 204 may transmit ultrasound energy at a third setting to facilitate transient cavitation, i.e., popping bubbles.
Ultrasound parameters for transient cavitation at a range of frequencies from 500 kHz to 2 MHz, focused or unfocused, and a mechanical index (MI) greater than 1.9. The duty cycle required for transient cavitation may be very low, and the preferred embodiment is a wideband pulse (1 to 20 cycles) transmitted at a duty cycle less than 5%.
The transducer apparatus 204 may include any of the transducers disclosed herein, and may be operably connected to the needle array 214.
The transducer apparatus 204 may transmit ultrasound energy at a fourth frequency range to facilitate the pushing of bubbles within the tissue by acoustic streaming and/or acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Acoustic Streaming and Radiation Force
Sound propagating through a medium produces a force on particles suspended in the medium, and also upon the medium itself. Ultrasound produces a radiation force that is exerted upon objects in a medium with an acoustic impedance different than that of the medium. An example is a nanoparticle in blood, although, as one of ordinary skill will recognize, ultrasound radiation forces also may be generated on non-liquid core carrier particles. When the medium is a liquid, the fluid translation resulting from application of ultrasound is called acoustic streaming.
The ability of radiation force to concentrate microbubbles in-vitro and in-vivo has been demonstrated, e.g., Dayton, et al., Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 25(8):1195-1201 (1999). An ultrasound transducer pulsing at 5 MHz center frequency, 10 kHz pulse repetition frequency (“PRF”), and 800 kPa peak pressure, has been shown to concentrate microbubbles against a vessel wall in-vivo, and reduce the velocity of these flowing agents an order of magnitude. In addition, the application of radiation to concentrate drug delivery carrier particles and the combined effects of radiation force-induced concentration and carrier fragmentation has been demonstrated. See U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/928,648, entitled “Ultrasonic Concentration of Drug Delivery Capsules,” filed Aug. 26, 2004 by Paul Dayton et al., which is incorporated herein by reference.
Acoustic streaming and optionally radiation force may be used to “push” or concentrate microbubbles injected into the tissue along a cell membrane. Notably, acoustic streaming has previously been used to push or concentrate carrier particles within a blood vessel. In contrast, the present invention utilizes acoustic streaming to push bubbles within subcutaneous tissue to concentrate the bubble against the walls of cells to be treated.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a solution containing microbubbles is injected into subcutaneous tissue or a solution containing dissolved gas is injected into subcutaneous tissue and insonated to bring the gas out of solution thereby generating bubbles within the subcutaneous tissue. The bubbles are pushed against the cell walls using acoustic streaming, and then insonated to induce transient cavitation to enhance the transport of the solution through the cell membrane and/or mechanically disrupt the cell membrane to selectively lyse cells.
The ultrasound parameters useful for inducing acoustic streaming include ultrasound waves having center frequencies about 0.1-20 MHz, at an acoustic pressure about 100 kPa-20 MPa, a long cycle length (e.g., about >10 cycles and continuous-wave) OR a short cycle length (e.g., about <10 cycle), and high pulse repetition frequency (e.g., about >500 Hz). The specific parameters will depend on the choice of carrier particle, as detailed further below, and can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art.
According to one embodiment, the transducer apparatus 204 includes a single transducer capable of operating a plurality of operating modes to facilitate stable cavitation, transient cavitation, acoustic streaming, and sonoporation. According to another embodiment, the transducer apparatus 204 includes first and second transducers with first transducer optimized for popping bubbles (transient cavitation) and the second transducer optimized for bringing dissolved gas out of solution (stable cavitation) and/or pushing the bubbles using acoustic radiation force.
The transducer apparatus may produce focused, unfocused, or defocused ultrasound waves. Focused ultrasound refers to generally converging ultrasound waves, unfocused ultrasound refers to generally parallel ultrasound waves and defocused ultrasound wave refers to generally diverging ultrasound waves.
However, according to a preferred embodiment, the transducer apparatus 204 selectively produces unfocused and/or defocused ultrasound waves. For example, it may be desirable to utilize unfocused waves during transient cavitation, and defocused waves during stable cavitation. To this end the transducer apparatus may include a flat transducer, i.e., a transducer having a generally planar acoustic wear layer (acoustic window) for producing unfocused ultrasound waves (nonconverging waves) and/or a convex transducer, i.e., a transducer having a convex acoustic wear layer for producing defocused ultrasound waves (diverging waves).
As will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, there are many different configurations for the ultrasound apparatus.
The inner and outer transducers depicted in
The ultrasound apparatus 204 illustrated in
It should be noted that the transducer apparatus 204 may include one or more arrays of transducers. For example, the transducer apparatus may include an array of transducers for stable cavitation and/or an array of transducers for transient cavitation.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a solution which may or may not include microbubbles is injected into subcutaneous tissue. The solution is pushed against the cell walls using acoustic streaming, and then the subcutaneous tissue is insonated to induce sonoporation and facilitate the uptake/absorption of solution by the tissue. Solution is injected an insonated using a system such as system 200 depicted in
As described in U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/292,950 filed Dec. 2, 2005, the ultrasound energy from ultrasound generator 206 is applied to the tissue 220 via ultrasound transducer 204. Ultrasound control unit 208 controls the various ultrasound parameters and generally controls the supply of ultrasound by generator 206. Preferably, ultrasound control unit 208 communicates with the injection control unit 210 to synchronize the application or ultrasound energy with the injection of fluid. It may for example be desirable to quickly apply energy to the tissue before the microbubbles dissipate or are absorbed by the tissue.
The ultrasound transducer 204 is preferably configured to deliver unfocused ultrasound at an intensity and pressure sufficient to noninvasively cavitate the micro bubbles within tissue thereby causing cell lysis. The intensity and pressure of the ultrasound applied to the tissue is preferably selected to minimize the heating of tissue and in particular avoid burning the patient's skin. The transducer 204 may include a thermocouple 238 or the like to monitor the temperature of the transducer 204.
In at least one embodiment the liposculpture system 200 (
The reader 250 preferably communicates with the injection control unit 210. The injection control unit 210 may count the number of injection cycles that a given needle array 214 has been used, and may warn the operator if the number exceeds a threshold number. The injection control unit 250 may use information stored on the identifier 252 to adjust the injection depth or injection flow rate. The injection control unit 210 may further inhibit usage of a needle array if it cannot authenticate, verify or read the identifier 252.
The identifier 252 may be a barcode label, a radio frequency tag, smart chip or other machine-readable medium such as known in the art.
The ultrasound transducer 204 may also include an identifier 252. The identifier 252 may be used to store information identifying the characteristics of the transducer 204, which is used by the ultrasound control unit 208 in setting or verifying the treatment settings. The ultrasound control unit 208 may inhibit insonation if it cannot authenticate, verify or read the identifier 252.
As described above, the transducer 204 may be integrated with the needle array 214 in which case a single identifier 252 may store information describing characteristics of both the needle(s) 218 and the transducer 204. The ultrasound control unit 208 may use information on the identifier 252 to track the amount of time the identified ultrasound transducer 204 has been operated and at what power levels, and may inhibit insonation if the accumulated insonation time exceeds a threshold value.
The constituent components of the device 100 may be formed of any sterilizable, biocompatible material. Moreover, some or all of the components may be disposable, i.e., manufactured for single-patient use, to minimize potential cross-contamination of patients. The needle array 214 is preferably a disposable component, as the needles 218 will likely dull with use.
One or more optical or pressure sensors 254 (
It may be advantageous to couple the needles 218 with the ultrasound transducer 204 such that ultrasound is transmitted through the needle(s) 218 to the tissue. Applying ultrasound in this manner may facilitate targeted cavitation and/or may facilitate penetration of the needle(s) 218 into the tissue.
According to one embodiment, the fat lysing solution includes epinephrine as its active ingredient. The epinephrine may be combined with an aqueous solution, isotonic saline, normal saline, hypotonic saline, hypotonic solution, or a hypertonic solution. The solution may optionally include one or more additives/agents to raise the pH (e.g., sodium bicarbonate) or a buffering agent such those listed in Table 5 above or other buffering agents such as known in the art.
According to a presently preferred embodiment the fat lysing solution includes epinephrine in hypotonic buffered saline.
The inclusion of ultrasound in system 200 may facilitate the absorption and/or distribution of the fat lysing solution. The inclusion of ultrasound in system 200 may facilitate the absorption and/or distribution of the fat lysing solution. More particularly, the ultrasound may be used to enhance the distribution, absorption, and/or uptake of the solution in the tissue by permanently or temporarily opening pores in the cell membrane (sonoporation), generating microstreaming in the solution, or locally heating the solution or the tissue. According to one aspect of the invention, the ultrasound generator 206 may be operated at a first setting to facilitate distribution of the solution and then it may be operated at a second setting to facilitate absorption. The sonoporation may be reversible or irreversible.
The system 200 may include an optional ultrasound transducer 258 for vibrating the needles 218 to facilitate tissue penetration and/or a needle rotation mechanism 256 which may be used in conjunction with side-firing needles 218 to facilitate even distribution of the solution. The same transducer apparatus 204 used to facilitate absorption and/or distribution of the solution may be used to facilitate tissue penetration thereby eliminating the need for a separate transducer 258.
The system 200 may include any or all of the features described in this disclosure including means for selectively adjusting the amount of solution injected by each of the needles 218 and/or the rate or pressure at which the solution is injected into the tissue. Still further the system 200 may include the selective adjustment of the injection depth and/or the tissue apposition mechanism as described above. Mode of Operation/Method of Use
According to a first mode of operation, solution is percutaneously injected into subcutaneous tissue, and the tissue is insonated at a first ultrasound setting to distribute the solution. Once the solution has been distributed the tissue is insonated at a second setting to induce sonoporation thereby inducing cell lysis. According to this mode of operation the solution need not contain microbubbles as they do not contribute to cell lysis. To increase the efficacy of this mode of operation it is recommended to repeat the injection and insonation of the tissue through 10 to 50 cycles.
According to a second mode of operation, a solution containing microbubbles is percutaneously injected into subcutaneous tissue, and the tissue is insonated at a first ultrasound setting to distribute the solution and/or push the microbubbles against the cell walls. Thereafter the tissue is insonated at a second setting (for between 1 millisecond and 1 second) to induce transient cavitation inducing cell lysis. To increase the efficacy of this mode of operation it is recommended to repeat the injection and insonation of the tissue through 10 to 50 cycles.
It should be appreciated that it is important to synchronize the timing of the insonation. Notably, the microbubbles will be absorbed by the tissue and/or go into solution within a relatively short period of time. Thus, it is important to distribute the microbubbles (using acoustic radiation force) and induce transient cavitation within a relatively short time after the solution has been injected into the subcutaneous tissue.
According to a presently preferred embodiment, the tissue is insonated to facilitate distribution of the micro bubble solution through acoustic radiation force and/or microstreaming occurs simultaneously as the solution is injected into the tissue or within a very short amount of time afterward. The injection of a small amount of the microbubble solution takes approximately 200 milliseconds and insonation to induce distribution through acoustic radiation force takes between 1 millisecond and 1 second. Next, the tissue is insonated to induce transient cavitation for approximately 400 milliseconds.
According to a third mode of operation, a solution containing dissolved gas, i.e., dissolved gas bubbles is percutaneously injected into subcutaneous tissue, and the tissue is insonated at a first ultrasound setting to bring the bubbles out of solution (for between 100 microseconds and 1 millisecond) followed immediately by insonation at a second setting (for between 1 millisecond and 1 second) to distribute the solution and/or push the microbubbles against the cell walls. Thereafter the tissue is insonated at a third setting (for between 100 microseconds and 1 second) to induce transient cavitation inducing cell lysis. To increase the efficacy of this mode of operation it is recommended to repeat the injection and insonation of the tissue through 10 to 50 cycles.
It should be appreciated that it is important to synchronize the timing of the insonation. Notably, the microbubbles will be absorbed by the tissue and/or go into solution within a relatively short period of time. Thus, it is important to distribute the microbubbles (using acoustic radiation force) and induce transient cavitation within a relatively short time after the bubbles have been brought out of solution.
According to a presently preferred embodiment, the tissue is insonated to induce stable cavitation and bring the bubbles out of solution after the solution has been injected into the subcutaneous tissue. Satisfactory stable cavitation results have been achieved by insonating for approximately 100 microseconds. Thereafter the tissue is insonated to facilitate distribution of the micro bubble solution through acoustic radiation force and/or microstreaming occurs. Insonating for between 1 millisecond and 1 second is required to distribute the microbubbles. Immediately thereafter the tissue is insonated to induce transient cavitation for approximately 400 milliseconds.
The invention may be combined with other methods or apparatus for treating tissues. For example, the invention may also include use of skin tightening procedures, for example, ThermaCool™ available from Thermage Corporation located in Hayward, Calif., Cutera Titan™ available from Cutera, Inc. located in Brisbane, Calif., or Aluma™ available from Lumenis, Inc. located in Santa Clara, Calif.
The invention may be embodied in other forms without departure from the spirit and essential characteristics thereof. The embodiments described therefore are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. Although the present invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art are also within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is intended to be defined only by reference to the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/799,377, filed on Mar. 13, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,079,001, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/771,951, filed Jun. 29, 2007, now abandoned, wherein Ser. No. 11/771,951 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/515,634, filed Sep. 5, 2006, now abandoned, wherein Ser. No. 11/771,951 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/334,805, filed Jan. 17, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,601,128, wherein Ser. No. 11/771,951 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/334,794, filed Jan. 17, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,588,547, and wherein Ser. No. 11/771,951 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,950, filed Dec. 2, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,967,763, the entirety of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2370529 | Fuller | Feb 1945 | A |
2490409 | Brown | Dec 1949 | A |
2738172 | Spiess et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
2945496 | Fosdal | Jul 1960 | A |
2961382 | Singher et al. | Nov 1960 | A |
3129944 | Amos et al. | Apr 1964 | A |
3324854 | Weese | Jun 1967 | A |
3590808 | Muller | Jul 1971 | A |
3735336 | Long | May 1973 | A |
3964482 | Gerstel et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3991763 | Genese | Nov 1976 | A |
4150669 | Latorre | Apr 1979 | A |
4188952 | Loschilov et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4211949 | Brisken et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4212206 | Hartemann et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4231368 | Becker et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4248231 | Herczog et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4249923 | Walda | Feb 1981 | A |
4276885 | Tickner et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4299219 | Norris, Jr. | Nov 1981 | A |
4309989 | Fahim | Jan 1982 | A |
4373458 | Dorosz et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4466442 | Hilmann et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4497325 | Wedel | Feb 1985 | A |
4536180 | Johnson | Aug 1985 | A |
4549533 | Cain | Oct 1985 | A |
4608043 | Larkin | Aug 1986 | A |
4641652 | Hutterer et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646754 | Seale | Mar 1987 | A |
4657756 | Rasor et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4673387 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4681119 | Rasor et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4684479 | D'Arrigo | Aug 1987 | A |
4688570 | Kramer et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689986 | Carson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4718433 | Feinstein | Jan 1988 | A |
4720075 | Peterson et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4751921 | Park | Jun 1988 | A |
4762915 | Kung et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4774958 | Feinstein | Oct 1988 | A |
4796624 | Trott et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4797285 | Barenholz et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4815462 | Clark | Mar 1989 | A |
4844080 | Frass et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4844470 | Hammon et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4844882 | Widder et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4886491 | Parisi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4900540 | Ryan et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919986 | Lay et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4920954 | Alliger et al. | May 1990 | A |
4936281 | Stasz | Jun 1990 | A |
4936303 | Detwiler et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4957656 | Cerny et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5022414 | Muller | Jun 1991 | A |
5040537 | Katakura | Aug 1991 | A |
5050537 | Fox | Sep 1991 | A |
5069664 | Guess et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083568 | Shimazaki et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5088499 | Unger | Feb 1992 | A |
5100390 | Lubeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5131600 | Klimpel | Jul 1992 | A |
5143063 | Fellner | Sep 1992 | A |
5149319 | Unger | Sep 1992 | A |
5158071 | Umemura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5170604 | Hedly | Dec 1992 | A |
5178433 | Wagner | Jan 1993 | A |
5203785 | Slater | Apr 1993 | A |
5209720 | Unger | May 1993 | A |
5215104 | Steinert | Jun 1993 | A |
5215680 | D'Arrigo | Jun 1993 | A |
5216130 | Line et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5219401 | Cathignol et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5261922 | Hood | Nov 1993 | A |
5308334 | Sancoff | May 1994 | A |
5310540 | Giddey et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312364 | Jacobs | May 1994 | A |
5315998 | Tachibana et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316000 | Chapelon et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320607 | Ishibashi | Jun 1994 | A |
5342380 | Hood | Aug 1994 | A |
5352436 | Wheatley et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354307 | Porowski | Oct 1994 | A |
5380411 | Schlief | Jan 1995 | A |
5383858 | Reilly et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5385561 | Cerny | Jan 1995 | A |
5409126 | DeMars | Apr 1995 | A |
5413574 | Fugo | May 1995 | A |
5415160 | Ortiz et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417654 | Kelman | May 1995 | A |
5419761 | Narayanan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419777 | Hofling et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425580 | Beller | Jun 1995 | A |
5437640 | Schwab | Aug 1995 | A |
5441490 | Svedman | Aug 1995 | A |
5449351 | Zohmann | Sep 1995 | A |
5457041 | Ginaven et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476368 | Rabenau et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478315 | Brothers | Dec 1995 | A |
5494038 | Wang et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5507790 | Weiss | Apr 1996 | A |
5522797 | Grimm | Jun 1996 | A |
5533981 | Mandro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545123 | Ortiz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556406 | Gordon et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562693 | Devlin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569242 | Lax et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571131 | Ek et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573002 | Pratt | Nov 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5590657 | Cain | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon | Feb 1997 | A |
5601584 | Obagi et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607441 | Sierocuk et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5639443 | Schutt et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649947 | Auerbach et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662646 | Fumich | Sep 1997 | A |
5681026 | Durand | Oct 1997 | A |
5690657 | Koepnick | Nov 1997 | A |
5695460 | Siegel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5716326 | Dannan | Feb 1998 | A |
5733572 | Unger et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755753 | Knowlton | May 1998 | A |
5766198 | Li | Jun 1998 | A |
5778894 | Dorogi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795311 | Wess | Aug 1998 | A |
5797627 | Salter et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817054 | Grimm | Oct 1998 | A |
5817115 | Nigam | Oct 1998 | A |
5827204 | Grandia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827216 | Igo et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5865309 | Futagawa et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871524 | Knowlton | Feb 1999 | A |
5884631 | Silberg | Mar 1999 | A |
5885232 | Guitay | Mar 1999 | A |
5902272 | Eggers et al. | May 1999 | A |
5911700 | Mozsary et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911703 | Slate et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918757 | Przytulla et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5919219 | Knowlton | Jul 1999 | A |
5935142 | Hood | Aug 1999 | A |
5935143 | Hood | Aug 1999 | A |
5942408 | Christensen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948011 | Knowlton | Sep 1999 | A |
5961475 | Guitay | Oct 1999 | A |
5964776 | Peyman | Oct 1999 | A |
5976153 | Fischel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976163 | Nigam | Nov 1999 | A |
5980517 | Gough | Nov 1999 | A |
5983131 | Weaver et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984915 | Loeb et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993423 | Choi | Nov 1999 | A |
5997501 | Gross et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6035897 | Kozyuk | Mar 2000 | A |
6039048 | Silberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6042539 | Harper et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047215 | McClure et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048337 | Svedman | Apr 2000 | A |
6066131 | Mueller et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071239 | Cribbs et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083236 | Feingold | Jul 2000 | A |
6102887 | Altman | Aug 2000 | A |
6113558 | Rosenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117152 | Huitema | Sep 2000 | A |
RE36939 | Tachibana et al. | Oct 2000 | E |
6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
6132755 | Eicher et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139518 | Mozsary et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155989 | Collins | Dec 2000 | A |
6162232 | Shadduck | Dec 2000 | A |
6176854 | Cone | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183442 | Athanasiou et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193672 | Clement | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200291 | Di Pietro | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200313 | Abe et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203540 | Weber et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210393 | Brisken | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237604 | Burnside et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241753 | Knowlten | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254580 | Svedman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254614 | Jesseph | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258056 | Turley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258378 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261272 | Gross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273877 | West et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277116 | Utely et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280401 | Mahurkar | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302863 | Tankovich | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309355 | Cain et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311090 | Knowlton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312439 | Gordon | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315756 | Tankovich | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315777 | Comben | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319230 | Palasis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321109 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6325801 | Monnier | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338710 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6350276 | Knowlton | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366206 | Ishikawa | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375634 | Carroll | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377854 | Knowlton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377855 | Knowlton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381497 | Knowlton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381498 | Knowlton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6387380 | Knowlton | May 2002 | B1 |
6391020 | Kurtz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391023 | Weber et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6397098 | Uber, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405090 | Knowlton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409665 | Scott et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413216 | Cain et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425912 | Knowlton | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430446 | Knowlton | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432101 | Weber et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436078 | Svedman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438424 | Knowlton | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440096 | Lastovich et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440121 | Weber et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443914 | Costantino | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450979 | Miwa | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451240 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453202 | Knowlton | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454730 | Hechel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461350 | Underwood et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461378 | Knowlton | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464680 | Brisken et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470216 | Knowlton | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470218 | Behl | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479034 | Unger et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500141 | Irion et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506611 | Bienert et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6511463 | Wood et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514220 | Melton | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6517498 | Burbank et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6537242 | Palmer | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537246 | Unger et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544201 | Guitay | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6569176 | Jesseph | May 2003 | B2 |
6572839 | Sugita | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575930 | Trombley, III et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582442 | Simon et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585678 | Tachibana et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599305 | Feingold | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602251 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605079 | Shanks et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605080 | Altshuler et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607498 | Eshel | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6611707 | Prausnitz et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615166 | Guheen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623457 | Rosenberg | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626854 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629949 | Douglas | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638767 | Unger et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645162 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662054 | Kreindel et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663616 | Roth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663618 | Weber et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663820 | Arias et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685657 | Jones | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6687537 | Bernabei | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695781 | Rabiner | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695808 | Tom | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702779 | Connelly et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725095 | Fenn et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730061 | Cuschieri et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6743211 | Prausnitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6743215 | Bernabei | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749624 | Knowlton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6770071 | Woloszko et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780171 | Gabel et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795727 | Giammarusti | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795728 | Chornenky et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817988 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826429 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855133 | Svedman | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882884 | Mosk et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883729 | Putvinski et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889090 | Kreindel | May 2005 | B2 |
6892099 | Jaafar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896659 | Conston et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896666 | Kochamba | May 2005 | B2 |
6896674 | Woloszko et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6902554 | Huttner | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6905480 | McGuckin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910671 | Korkus et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6916328 | Brett et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918907 | Kelly et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918908 | Bonner et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6920883 | Bessette et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926683 | Kochman et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931277 | Yuzhakov et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6945937 | Culp et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957186 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6960205 | Jahns et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971994 | Young | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6974450 | Weber | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6994691 | Ejlersen | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6994705 | Nebis et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7066922 | Angel et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7083580 | Bernabei | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115108 | Wilkinson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149698 | Guheen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7153306 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169115 | Nobis et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184614 | Slatkine | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184826 | Cormier et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186252 | Nobis et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7217265 | Hennings et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223275 | Shiuey | May 2007 | B2 |
7226446 | Mody et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7238183 | Kreindel | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250047 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7252641 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258674 | Cribbs et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7278991 | Morris et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7306095 | Bourque et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7315826 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7331951 | Eshel et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7335158 | Taylor | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338551 | Kozyuk | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347855 | Eshel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351295 | Pawlik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374551 | Liang | May 2008 | B2 |
7376460 | Bernabei | May 2008 | B2 |
7392080 | Eppstein et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7410476 | Wilkinson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7419798 | Ericson | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437189 | Matsumura et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442192 | Knowlton | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452358 | Stern et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455663 | Bikovsky | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7470237 | Beckman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473251 | Knowlton et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7479104 | Lau et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7494488 | Weber | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507209 | Nezhat et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524318 | Young et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7546918 | Gollier et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559905 | Kagosaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7566318 | Haefner | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7585281 | Nezhat et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588547 | Deem et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7588557 | Nakao | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601128 | Deem et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7625354 | Hochman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7625371 | Morris et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7678097 | Peluso et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7740600 | Slatkine et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7762964 | Slatkine et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762965 | Slatkine et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770611 | Houwaert et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771374 | Slatkine et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7824348 | Barthe et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828827 | Gartstein et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7842008 | Clarke et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7901421 | Shiuey et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7935139 | Slatkine et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7938824 | Chornenky et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967763 | Deem et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7985199 | Kornerup et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8025658 | Chong et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8083715 | Sonoda et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8086322 | Schouenborg | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8103355 | Mulholland et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8127771 | Hennings | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8133191 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8256429 | Hennings et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8348867 | Deem | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357146 | Hennings et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366643 | Deem | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8401668 | Deem et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406894 | Johnson | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8439940 | Chomas et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8518069 | Clark, III et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8535302 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540705 | Mehta | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8573227 | Hennings et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8608737 | Mehta et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8636665 | Slayton et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652123 | Gurtner et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663112 | Slayton et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8671622 | Thomas | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672848 | Slayton et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676338 | Levinson | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685012 | Hennings et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8753339 | Clark, III et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771263 | Epshtein et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8825176 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834547 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8868204 | Edoute et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8882753 | Mehta et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8882758 | Nebrigie et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8894678 | Clark, III et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8900261 | Clark, III et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8900262 | Clark, III et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8979882 | Drews et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010001829 | Sugimura et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010004702 | Peyman | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010014805 | Burbank et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010053887 | Douglas et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020029053 | Gordon | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020082528 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082589 | Friedman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099356 | Unger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111569 | Rosenschein | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120238 | McGuckin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120260 | Morris et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120261 | Morris et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020130126 | Rosenberg | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134733 | Kerfoot | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137991 | Scarantino | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020169394 | Eppstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177846 | Mulier | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185557 | Sparks | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193784 | McHale et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193831 | Smith, III | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006677 | Okuda et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009153 | Brisken et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069502 | Makin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074023 | Kaplan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083536 | Eshel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120269 | Bessette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130628 | Duffy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130655 | Woloszko et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130711 | Pearson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139740 | Kreindel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139755 | Dybbs | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153905 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030153960 | Chornenky et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171670 | Gumb et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187371 | Vortman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212350 | Tadlock | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228254 | Klaveness et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233083 | Houwaert | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233110 | Jesseph | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006566 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019299 | Ritchart et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019371 | Jaafar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023844 | Pettis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030263 | Dubrul et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039312 | Hillstead et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040058882 | Eriksson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073144 | Carava | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073206 | Foley et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079371 | Gray | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097967 | Ignon | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106867 | Eshel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040120861 | Petroff | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122483 | Nathan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138712 | Tamarkin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158150 | Rabiner | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162546 | Liang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162554 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167558 | Igo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186425 | Schneider et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200909 | McMillan et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202576 | Aceti et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040206365 | Knowlton | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210214 | Knowlton | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215101 | Rioux et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215110 | Kreindel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220512 | Kreindel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236248 | Svedman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236252 | Muzzi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243159 | Shiuey | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243160 | Shiuey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040251566 | Kozyuk | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253148 | Leaton | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253183 | Uber, III et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264293 | Laugharn et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010197 | Lau et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015024 | Babaev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027242 | Gabel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033338 | Ferree | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049543 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055018 | Kreindel | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080333 | Piron et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085748 | Culp et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102009 | Costantino | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131439 | Brett et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136548 | McDevitt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137525 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139142 | Kelley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154309 | Etchells et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154314 | Quistgaard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154443 | Linder et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163711 | Nycz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182385 | Epley | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182462 | Chornenky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050191252 | Mutsui | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203497 | Speeg | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215987 | Slatkine | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234527 | Slatkine | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256536 | Grundeman et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268703 | Funck et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036300 | Kreindel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058678 | Vitek et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074313 | Slayton | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074314 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079921 | Nezhat et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094988 | Tosaya et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100555 | Cagle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111744 | Makin et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122509 | Desilets | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060206040 | Greenberg | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206117 | Harp | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060211958 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235732 | Miller et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241672 | Zadini et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241673 | Zadini | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259102 | Slatkine | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264809 | Hansmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264926 | Kochamba | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293722 | Slatkine et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005091 | Zadini et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010810 | Kochamba | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016234 | Daxer | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027411 | Ella et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031482 | Castro et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035201 | Desilets et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041961 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043295 | Chomas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055156 | Desilets et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055179 | Deem et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060989 | Deem et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118077 | Clarke et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118166 | Nobis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129708 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142881 | Hennings | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156096 | Sonoda et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179515 | Matsutani et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191827 | Lischinsky et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197907 | Bruder et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197917 | Bagge | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070239075 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255355 | Altshuler et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270745 | Nezhat et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282318 | Spooner et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293849 | Hennings et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080014627 | Merchant et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015435 | Cribbs et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015624 | Sonoda et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027328 | Klopotek et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027384 | Wang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058603 | Edelstein et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058851 | Edelstein et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091182 | Mehta | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109023 | Greer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147084 | Bleich et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183164 | Elkins et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188835 | Hennings et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195036 | Merchant et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200845 | Sokka et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080200864 | Holzbaur et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215039 | Slatkine et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234609 | Kreindel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249526 | Knowlton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262527 | Eder et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269668 | Keenan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269687 | Chong et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306476 | Hennings et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319356 | Cain et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319358 | Lai | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012434 | Anderson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018522 | Weintraub et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024192 | Mulholland | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048544 | Rybyanets | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088823 | Barak et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093864 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090124973 | D'Agostino et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125013 | Sypniewski et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090156958 | Mehta | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171255 | Rybyanets et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192441 | Gelbart et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198189 | Simons et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090221938 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240188 | Hyde et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248004 | Altshuler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090275879 | Deem et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090275899 | Deem et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090275967 | Stokes et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326439 | Chomas et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326441 | Iliescu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004536 | Rosenberg | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100016761 | Rosenberg | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100017750 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022999 | Gollnick et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100057056 | Gurtner et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100137799 | Imai | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100210915 | Caldwell et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228182 | Clark, III et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228207 | Ballakur et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100331875 | Sonoda et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028898 | Clark, III | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110295230 | O'Dea | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120022504 | Epshtein et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120116375 | Hennings | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136280 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136282 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165725 | Chomas | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120197242 | Rosenberg | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120277587 | Adanny et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316547 | Hennings et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130023855 | Hennings et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130096596 | Schafer | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130197315 | Foley | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130197427 | Merchant et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130296744 | Taskinen et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140025050 | Anderson | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031803 | Epshtein et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140107742 | Mehta | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140228834 | Adanny et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249609 | Zarsky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140257272 | Clark, III et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276693 | Altshuler et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277025 | Clark, III et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277047 | Clark, III et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277048 | Clark, III et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140316393 | Levinson | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1232837 | Feb 1988 | CA |
1239092 | Jul 1988 | CA |
1159908 | Sep 1997 | CN |
200720159899 | Dec 2007 | CN |
201131982 | Oct 2008 | CN |
3838530 | May 1990 | DE |
4426421 | Feb 1996 | DE |
148116 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0224934 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0278074 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0327490 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0384831 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0953432 | Mar 1999 | EP |
2643252 | Feb 1989 | FR |
1216813 | Dec 1970 | GB |
1577551 | Feb 1976 | GB |
2327614 | Mar 1999 | GB |
57-139358 | Aug 1982 | JP |
2126848 | May 1990 | JP |
2180275 | Jul 1990 | JP |
5215591 | Aug 1993 | JP |
2001516625 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2040283420 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005087519 | Apr 2005 | JP |
WO 8002365 | Nov 1980 | WO |
WO8905159 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO8905160 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO8909593 | Oct 1989 | WO |
WO9001971 | Mar 1990 | WO |
WO9209238 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO9515118 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9729701 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9913936 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9942138 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0036982 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 03030984 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03941597 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03047689 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO2004000116 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004069153 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2005009865 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005105282 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO2005105818 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO2006053588 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2007102161 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO2008139303 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2010020021 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO2011017663 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO2013059263 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2014009875 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2014009826 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO 2014060977 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2014097288 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO 2014108888 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2014141229 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Albrecht, T., et al., Guidelines for the Use of Contrast Agents in Ultrasound, Ultraschall in Med 2004, Jan. 2004, nn. 249-256, vol. 25. |
Bindal, Dr. V. V., et al., Environmental Health Criteria for Ultrasound, International Programme on Chemical Safety, 1982, on. 1-153, World Health Organization. |
Brown, Ph.D., S., Director of Plastic Surgery Research, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA, What Happens After Treatment With the UltroShape Device, UltraShape Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel (2005). |
Cartensen, E.L., Allerton Conference for Ultrasonics in Biophysics and Bioengineering: Cavitation, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1987, on. 687-688, vol. 13, Perzamon Journals Ltd. |
Chang, Peter P., et al., Thresholds for Inertial Cavitation in Albunex Suspensions Under Pulsed Ultrasound Conditions, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Jan. 2001, pp. 161-170, vol. 48, No. I. |
Chen, Wen-Shiang, Ultrasound Contrast Agent Behavior near the Fragmentation Threshold, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2000, pp. 1935-1938. |
Dijkmans, P.A., et al., Microbubbles and Ultrasound: From Diagnosis to Therapy, Eur J Echocardiography, 2004, pp. 245-256, vol. 5, Elsevier Ltd., The Netherlands. |
Feril, L.B., et al., Enhanced Ultrasound-Induced Apoptosis and Cell Lysis by a Hypnotic Medium, International Journal of Radiation Biology, Feb. 2004, PO. 165-175, vol. 2, Taylor & Francis Ltd., United Kingdom. |
Feril, Jr., Loreto B., et al., Biological Effects of Low Intensity Ultrasound: The Mechanism Involved, and its Implications on Therapy and on Biosafety of Ultrasound, J. Radial. Res., 2004, nn. 479-489, vol. 45. |
Forsberg, Ph.D., F., et al., On the Usefulness of the Mechanical Index Displayed on Clinical Ultrasound Scanners for Predicting Contrast Microbubble Destruction, J Ultrasound Med, 2005, pp. 443-450, vol. 24, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. |
Hanscom, D.R., Infringement Search Report prepared for K. Angela Macfarlane, Esq., Chief Technology Counsel, The Foundry, Nov. 15, 2005. |
Hexsel, D. et al, Side-By-Side Comparison of Areas with and without Cellulite Depressions Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc., 2009, pp. 1-7,Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
Hexsel, M.D., Doris Maria, et al., Subcision: a Treatment for Cellulite, International journal of Dermatology 2000, on. 539-544, vol. 39. |
Holland, Christy K., et al., In Vitro Detection of Cavitation Induced by a Diagnostic Ultrasound System, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Jan. 1992, pp. 95-101, vol. 39, No. I. |
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/chamber, definition of the term “chamber” retrieved Jun. 16, 2013. |
International Search Report dated Apr. 9, 2012 from corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US11/62449. |
Internet Web Site—www.icin.nllread/project 21, The Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, 3 pgs., visited Dec. 22, 2005. |
Internet Web Site—www.turnwoodinternational.comiCellulite.htm, Acthyderm Treating Cellulite, Aug. 5, 2005, 4pgs., visited Jan. 12, 2006. |
Japan Office Action—Application No. JP2000-190976 dated Jul. 11, 2000. |
Khan, M. et al., Treatment of cellulite—Part I. Pathophysiology, J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009, vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 361-370. |
Khan, M. et al., Treatment of cellulite—Part II. Advances and controversies, J Am Acad Dermatol, 2009, vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 373-384. |
Lawrence, M.D., N., et al., The Efficacy of External Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Dermatol SUIl!, Apr. 2000, nn. 329-332, vol. 26, Blackwell Science, Inc. |
Michaelson, Solomon M., et al., Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation, Rochester International Conference on Environmental Toxicity, 75h, 1974, pp. 275-299, Plenum Press, New York and London. |
Miller, Douglas 1., A Review of the Ultrasonic Bioeffects of Microsonation, Gas-Body Activiation, and Related Cavitation-Like Phenomena, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1987, pp. 443-470, vol. 13, Pergamon Journals Ltd. |
Miller, Douglas 1., et al., Further Investigations of ATP Release From Human Erythrocytes Exposed to Ultrasonically Activated Gas-Filled Pores, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1983, pp. 297-307, vol. 9, No. 3, Pergamon Press Ltd., Great Britain. |
Miller, Douglas L., et al., On the Oscillation Mode of Gas-filled Micropores, 1. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1985, pp. 946-953, vol. 77 (3). |
Miller, Douglas L., Gas Body Activation, Ultrasonics, Nov. 1984, pp. 261-269, vol. 22, No. 6, Butterworth & Co. Ltd. |
Miller, Douglas L., Microstreaming Shear As a Mechanism of Cell Death in Elodea Leaves Exposed to Ultrasound, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1985, op. 285-292, vol. II, No. 2, Pergamon Press, U.S.A. |
Miller, Morton W., et al., A Review of In Vitro Bioeffects of Inertial Ultrasonic Cavitation From a Mechanistic Perspective, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1996, nn. 1131-1154, vol. 22, No. 9. |
Nyborg, Dr. Wesley L., Physical Mechanisms for Biological Effects of Ultrasound, HEW Publicaton (FDA) 78-8062, Sep. 1977, pp. 1-59, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Rockville, Maryland. |
Orentreich, D. et al., Subcutaneous Incisionless (Subcision) Surgery for the Correction of Depressed Scars and Wrinkles, Dermatol Surg, 1995:21,1995, pp. 543-549, Esevier Science Inc. |
Carstensen, E.L. et al, Biological Effects of Acoustic Cavitation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, May 13-16, 1985. |
Rohrich, M.D., R.I., et al., Comparative Lipoplasty Analysis of in Vivo-Treated Adipose Tissue, Plastic and Reconstructive SUfl'erv, May 2000, pn, 2152-2158, vol. 105, No. 6. |
Sasaki, Gordon H. MD, Comparison of Results of Wire Subcision Peformed Alone, With Fills, and/or With Adjacent Surgical Procedures, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, vol. 28, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2008, p. 619-626. |
Scheinfeld, M.D., J.D. Faad, N.S., Liposuction Techniques: External Ultrasound-Assisted, eMedicine.com, Inc., 2005. |
Villarraga, M.D., H.R., et al., Destruction of Contrast Microbubbles During Ultrasound Imaging at Conventional Power Output, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Oct. 1997, pp. 783-791. |
Vivino, Alfred A., et al., Stable Cavitation at low Ultrasonic Intensities Induces Cell Death and Inhibits H-TdR Incorporation by Con-A-Stimulated Murine Lymphocytes in Vitro, Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 1985, pp. 751-759, vol. II, No. 5, Pergamon Press Ltd. |
Weaver, James C. Electroporation; a general phenomenon for manipulating cells and tissues. J Cell Biochem. Apr. 1993; 51(4):426-35. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150112245 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13799377 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14536375 | US | |
Parent | 11771951 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 13799377 | US | |
Parent | 11515634 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 11771951 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11334805 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11515634 | US | |
Parent | 11334794 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11334805 | US | |
Parent | 11292950 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 11334794 | US |