The present disclosure relates generally to providing customer service via agents, and more specifically to routing and assigning work items to agents.
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure, which are described and/or claimed below. This discussion is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Organizations, regardless of size, rely upon access to information technology (IT) and data and services for their continued operation and success. A respective organization's IT infrastructure may have associated hardware resources (e.g. computing devices, load balancers, firewalls, switches, etc.) and software resources (e.g. productivity software, database applications, custom applications, and so forth). Over time, more and more organizations have turned to cloud computing approaches to supplement or enhance their IT infrastructure solutions.
Cloud computing relates to the sharing of computing resources that are generally accessed via the Internet. In particular, a cloud computing infrastructure allows users, such as individuals and/or enterprises, to access a shared pool of computing resources, such as servers, storage devices, networks, applications, and/or other computing based services. By doing so, users are able to access computing resources on demand that are located at remote locations, which resources may be used to perform a variety of computing functions (e.g., storing and/or processing large quantities of computing data). For enterprise and other organization users, cloud computing provides flexibility in accessing cloud computing resources without accruing large up-front costs, such as purchasing expensive network equipment or investing large amounts of time in establishing a private network infrastructure. Instead, by utilizing cloud computing resources, users are able redirect their resources to focus on their enterprise's core functions.
In modern communication networks, examples of cloud computing services a user may utilize include so-called infrastructure as a service (IaaS), software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) technologies. IaaS is a model in which providers abstract away the complexity of hardware infrastructure and provide rapid, simplified provisioning of virtual servers and storage, giving enterprises access to computing capacity on demand. In such an approach, however, a user may be left to install and maintain platform components and applications. SaaS is a delivery model that provides software as a service rather than an end product. Instead of utilizing a local network or individual software installations, software is typically licensed on a subscription basis, hosted on a remote machine, and accessed by client customers as needed. For example, users are generally able to access a variety of enterprise and/or information technology (IT)-related software via a web browser. PaaS acts as an extension of SaaS that goes beyond providing software services by offering customizability and expandability features to meet a user's needs. For example, PaaS can provide a cloud-based developmental platform for users to develop, modify, and/or customize applications and/or automating enterprise operations without maintaining network infrastructure and/or allocating computing resources normally associated with these functions.
A service provider may provide customer service to its customers via one or more teams of agents. Customers may provide communications to the service provider requesting that an agent perform a task or engage in an interaction, which may result in a work item. Typically, the work item is manually reviewed by a human reviewer. The reviewer predicts what actions may be involved in resolving or addressing the work item, considers the available service agents, and assigns the work item to a service agent. This process may be slow, tedious, time consuming, prone to errors, and expensive.
A summary of certain embodiments disclosed herein is set forth below. It should be understood that these aspects are presented merely to provide the reader with a brief summary of these certain embodiments and that these aspects are not intended to limit the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, this disclosure may encompass a variety of aspects that may not be set forth below.
The disclosed subject matter includes techniques for defining skill determination rules and then using the skill determination rules to identify skills associated with work items. Specifically, defining a skill determination rule may include receiving a request to create a new skill determination rule or edit an existing skill determination rule. A skill determination rule definition GUI may then be generated and displayed. A type of skill determination rule may be selected. A simple rule may identify skills associated with the work item based on an attribute of the work item. A lookup or dynamic rule may identify skills associated with the work item by referencing a lookup table and mapping a field of the lookup table to a field of a source table. An advanced rule may identify skills associated with the work item by running a script. Dependent upon the type of rule selected, the user may provide inputs defining a rule of the selected type. Once inputs are provided, one or more tables may be updated to include the new and/or updated rule.
Once skill determination rules are defined, upon receipt of a work item, the relevant skill determination rules may be identified and applied. If the relevant skill determination rule is a simple rule, the relevant skills may be identified based on an attribute of the work item. If the relevant skill determination rule is a lookup or dynamic rule, the relevant skills may be identified by referencing a lookup table and mapping a field of the lookup table to a field of a source table. If the relevant skill determination rule is an advanced rule, the relevant skills may be identified by running a script on the work item. Once the relevant skills are identified, a many-to-many (m2m) object may be generated associating the work item with the relevant skills. Agents possessing the identified skills may be identified. If multiple agents are identified, an agent may be selected and the work item added to the selected agent's queue.
Various refinements of the features noted above may exist in relation to various aspects of the present disclosure. Further features may also be incorporated in these various aspects as well. These refinements and additional features may exist individually or in any combination. For instance, various features discussed below in relation to one or more of the illustrated embodiments may be incorporated into any of the above-described aspects of the present disclosure alone or in any combination. The brief summary presented above is intended only to familiarize the reader with certain aspects and contexts of embodiments of the present disclosure without limitation to the claimed subject matter.
Various aspects of this disclosure may be better understood upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings in which:
One or more specific embodiments will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, not all features of an actual implementation are described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and enterprise-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
As used herein, the term “computing system” refers to an electronic computing device such as, but not limited to, a single computer, virtual machine, virtual container, host, server, laptop, and/or mobile device, or to a plurality of electronic computing devices working together to perform the function described as being performed on or by the computing system. As used herein, the term “medium” refers to one or more non-transitory, computer-readable physical media that together store the contents described as being stored thereon. Embodiments may include non-volatile secondary storage, read-only memory (ROM), and/or random-access memory (RAM). As used herein, the term “application” refers to one or more computing modules, programs, processes, workloads, threads and/or a set of computing instructions executed by a computing system. Example embodiments of an application include software modules, software objects, software instances and/or other types of executable code.
A service provider may provide customer service via one or more teams of agents. Communications received from customers may trigger the creation of a work item. Typically, the work item is manually reviewed by a human reviewer, who predicts what actions may be involved in resolving or addressing the work item, considers the available service agents, and assigns the work item to a service agent. This process may be slow, tedious, time consuming, prone to errors, and expensive.
Accordingly, the disclosed techniques relate to defining skill determination rules and then using the skill determination rules to identify skills associated with work items. Upon receipt of a request to create a new skill determination rule or edit an existing skill determination rule, a skill determination rule definition GUI is generated and displayed and a type of skill determination rule may be selected. A simple rule may identify skills associated with the work item based on an attribute of the work item. A lookup or dynamic rule may identify skills associated with the work item by referencing a lookup table and mapping a field of the lookup table to a field of a source table. An advanced rule may identify skills associated with the work item by running a script. Dependent upon the type of rule selected, the user may provide inputs defining a rule of the selected type.
Once skill determination rules are defined, upon receipt of a work item, the relevant skill determination rules may be identified and applied. If the relevant skill determination rule is a simple rule, the relevant skills may be identified based on an attribute of the work item. If the relevant skill determination rule is a lookup or dynamic rule, the relevant skills may be identified by referencing a lookup table and mapping a field of the lookup table to a field of a source table. If the relevant skill determination rule is an advanced rule, the relevant skills may be identified by running a script on the work item. Once the relevant skills are identified, a many-to-many (m2m) object may be generated associating the work item with the relevant skills. Agents possessing the identified skills may be identified. If multiple agents are identified, an agent may be selected and the work item added to the selected agent's queue.
With the preceding in mind, the following figures relate to various types of generalized system architectures or configurations that may be employed to provide services to an organization in a multi-instance framework and on which the present approaches may be employed. Correspondingly, these system and platform examples may also relate to systems and platforms on which the techniques discussed herein may be implemented or otherwise utilized. Turning now to
For the illustrated embodiment,
In
To utilize computing resources within the platform 16, network operators may choose to configure the data centers 18 using a variety of computing infrastructures. In one embodiment, one or more of the data centers 18 are configured using a multi-tenant cloud architecture, such that one of the server instances 26 handles requests from and serves multiple customers. Data centers 18 with multi-tenant cloud architecture commingle and store data from multiple customers, where multiple customer instances are assigned to one of the virtual servers 26. In a multi-tenant cloud architecture, the particular virtual server 26 distinguishes between and segregates data and other information of the various customers. For example, a multi-tenant cloud architecture could assign a particular identifier for each customer in order to identify and segregate the data from each customer. Generally, implementing a multi-tenant cloud architecture may suffer from various drawbacks, such as a failure of a particular one of the server instances 26 causing outages for all customers allocated to the particular server instance.
In another embodiment, one or more of the data centers 18 are configured using a multi-instance cloud architecture to provide every customer its own unique customer instance or instances. For example, a multi-instance cloud architecture could provide each customer instance with its own dedicated application server and dedicated database server. In other examples, the multi-instance cloud architecture could deploy a single physical or virtual server 26 and/or other combinations of physical and/or virtual servers 26, such as one or more dedicated web servers, one or more dedicated application servers, and one or more database servers, for each customer instance. In a multi-instance cloud architecture, multiple customer instances could be installed on one or more respective hardware servers, where each customer instance is allocated certain portions of the physical server resources, such as computing memory, storage, and processing power. By doing so, each customer instance has its own unique software stack that provides the benefit of data isolation, relatively less downtime for customers to access the platform 16, and customer-driven upgrade schedules. An example of implementing a customer instance within a multi-instance cloud architecture will be discussed in more detail below with reference to
Although
As may be appreciated, the respective architectures and frameworks discussed with respect to
By way of background, it may be appreciated that the present approach may be implemented using one or more processor-based systems such as shown in
With this in mind, an example computer system may include some or all of the computer components depicted in
The one or more processors 202 may include one or more microprocessors capable of performing instructions stored in the memory 206. Additionally or alternatively, the one or more processors 202 may include application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and/or other devices designed to perform some or all of the functions discussed herein without calling instructions from the memory 206.
With respect to other components, the one or more busses 204 include suitable electrical channels to provide data and/or power between the various components of the computing system 200. The memory 206 may include any tangible, non-transitory, and computer-readable storage media. Although shown as a single block in
With the foregoing in mind,
For example, the hosted instance 300 may receive communications from the client instance 102 requesting help from a service agent. The communication may trigger creation of a work item that may represent a task to be completed by a service agent or an interaction to include the service agent. Because the work item may be associated with one or a few skills of a vast array of possible skills, it may be helpful to identify relevant skills associated with the work item and assign the work item to a service agent having the identified skills.
Each communication 404 is provided to a routing and assignment system 412. Upon receipt of a communication 404, the routing and assignment system 412 generates a work item 414. It should be understood, however, that there may not be a one to one ratio in the number of communications 404 and the number of work items 414. For example, in some embodiments, a single communication 404 may result in multiple work items 414 (e.g., a received communication raises multiple issues). In other embodiments, multiple communications 404 may be combined into a single work item (e.g., multiple communications providing updates on a single problem being experienced). At block 416, each work item 414 is routed to a queue 418 of one or more capable agents 402. As is described in more detail below, routing a work item 414 to a queue 418 may include identifying what skills may be utilized to complete the work item 414, identifying an agent 402 that possesses those skills, and adding the work item to the agent's queue 418. Identifying what skills may be utilized to complete the work item 414 may include, for example, analyzing the text of the communication 404 (e.g., to identify products, services, tasks to be performed, etc.), considering the sender of the communication 404, considering the platform through which the communication 404 was received, considering the geographical region from which the communication 404 came, applying one or more rules, referencing a lookup table, running a script, etc.
As illustrated, in some embodiments, reports, dashboards, and/or wallboards 420 may be updated based on the flow of work items 414. For example, reports, dashboards, and/or wallboards 420 may communicate the number of open work items 414, number of work items 414 in a queue 418, time from work item 414 open to closure, time until agent 402 picks up work item 414, and so forth. Further, the reports, dashboards, and/or wallboards 420 may breakdown data by agent 402, agent group, work item type, technology, product/service, channel 406, geographical area, etc.
Typically, routing work items 414 to agent queues 418 has been performed manually by a human being. However, by automating the routing of work items 414 to agent queues 418, routing may be performed more efficiently, with fewer errors, and at lower cost.
An add filter condition button 560, add or clause button 562, table field 564, condition field 566, character string field 568, “AND” button 570, “OR” button 572, and delete button 574 may be utilized to define one or more conditions for a simple rule. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, if the text in the “short description” field of the referenced source table (i.e., “Interaction”) contains the character string “IT”, then the condition is met and the simple rule is applied. As shown, the table field 564 may be a drop down menu that displays the various available fields of the source table referenced in the source table field 558. Similarly, the condition field 566 may also include a drop down menu for various options for conditions (e.g., “starts with”, “ends with”, “contains”, “does not contain”, “is”, “is not”, “is empty”, “is not empty”, “matches pattern”, “matches regex”, “is anything”, “is one of”, “is empty string”, “less than or is”, “greater than or is”, “between”, “is same”, “is different”, etc.). The character string field 568 may be a fillable field filled in by a user. Though a single condition is shown, the add filter condition button 560 may be used to add multiple conditions to the rule. These conditions may be related to one another with logic operations (e.g., AND, OR, etc.) such that all of the conditions must be met to trigger the rule, or some subset of the conditions being met triggers the rule. The “AND” button 570 and “OR” button may be used to indicate whether the AND or OR logical operation should be associated with a given condition. Further, the delete button 574 may be used to remove conditions.
The application field 576 may indicate whether the application is globally or locally scoped. The rule type field 578 indicates what type of rule is being defined (e.g., simple, dynamic/lookup, advanced, etc.). As shown, the rule type field 578 may be filled in by selecting an option from a drop down menu. An active checkbox 580 indicates whether or not the rule and/or condition is active and being applied.
Below the rule definition window 552 is the skills list 554. As shown, the skills list 554 includes a list a skills associated with a rule. Each record in the skills list 554 includes fields for the skill name 582 and whether or not the skill is mandatory 584. A mandatory skill is a skill that is required to complete a work item (i.e., a task or interaction). An agent that does not possess a mandatory skill will not be assigned the work item. Correspondingly, an optional skill (i.e., a skill that is not marked as mandatory) is a skill that is optionally required to complete the work item. An agent that does not possess an option skill associate with a work item may still be assigned the work item. The skills list 554 identifies the skills associated with a rule and indicates whether each skill is mandatory or merely suggested when the rule is implemented. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, when the short description field of the referenced lookup table contains the character string “IT”, the IT skill is mandatory, but the field services skill is merely suggested (i.e., not mandatory). As shown, the skills list 554 also includes an edit field 586 allowing a user to add or remove skills from the skills list 554. Further, an update button 588 and a delete button 590 allow a user to edit skills on the skills list 554 and/or remove skills from the skills list 554. Once information has been entered via the simple rule definition GUI 550, the system may use the provided data to generate records in the sd_skill_determination_rule table 504 described with regard to
As illustrated, the lookup attributes window 602 allows a user to define a lookup table and how the fields of the lookup table correspond to the source table in order to implement the lookup rule. Specifically, the lookup attributes window 602 includes a field for the lookup table 606, a field for the skill field 608 within the lookup table, and a mandatory checkbox 610. As shown, both the lookup table field 606 and the skill field 608 may be selected from drop down menus that are auto-populated based on the available lookup tables and then the field within the selected lookup table. The field mappings list 604 includes one or more records, each record identifying a source table field 612 and a corresponding mapped lookup table field 614. The field mappings list 604 may correspond with the sd_field_mapping table 506 described with regard to
Running the script on a work item, the script may reference the tables identified in
The script may also be utilized to resolve conflicts and/or keep skill mappings up to date. For example, if a skill is no longer required for a work item, the script can be used to remove the associated mapping record. If a new skill is required for a work item, the engine will generate a new mapping record. If a skill is still required for a work item, the script may update the mandatory status of the skill if the mandatory status changes. If there is a conflict between mandatory/optional skills, the script may resolve the conflict (e.g., by giving priority to the mandatory status).
If a simple rule has not been selected, the process 800 proceeds to block 808 and determines whether a lookup rule has been selected. If a lookup rule has been selected, the process 800 proceeds to block 810 and updates the GUI for defining a lookup rule (e.g., as shown in
If a lookup rule has not been selected, the process 800 proceeds to block 812 and determines whether an advanced rule has been selected. If an advanced rule has been selected, the process 800 proceeds to block 814 and updates the GUI for defining an advanced rule (e.g., as shown in
If the identified relevant skills do not include a simple rule, the process 850 proceeds to block 860 and determines whether the identified rules include a lookup rule. If yes, the process 850 proceeds to block 862 and applies the lookup rule and uses the lookup table to identify the relevant skills associated with the work item.
If the identified relevant skills do not include a lookup rule, the process 850 proceeds to block 864 and determines whether the identified rules include an advanced rule. If yes, the process 850 proceeds to block 866 and applies the advanced rule and uses the script table to identify the relevant skills associated with the work item.
At block 868, the process 850 generates an object associating the received work item with the relevant skills identified in blocks 858, 862, and/or 866. At block 870, one or more agents possessing the relevant skills are identified. At block 872, the work item is added to a queue of the one or more identified agents.
The disclosed techniques relate to defining skill determination rules and then using the skill determination rules to identify skills associated with work items. Upon receipt of a request to create a new skill determination rule or edit an existing skill determination rule, a skill determination rule definition GUI is generated and displayed and a type of skill determination rule may be selected. A simple rule may identify skills associated with the work item based on an attribute of the work item. A lookup or dynamic rule may identify skills associated with the work item by referencing a lookup table and mapping a field of the lookup table to a field of a source table. An advanced rule may identify skills associated with the work item by running a script. Dependent upon the type of rule selected, the user may provide inputs defining a rule of the selected type.
Once skill determination rules are defined, upon receipt of a work item, the relevant skill determination rules may be identified and applied. If the relevant skill determination rule is a simple rule, the relevant skills may be identified based on an attribute of the work item. If the relevant skill determination rule is a lookup or dynamic rule, the relevant skills may be identified by referencing a lookup table and mapping a field of the lookup table to a field of a source table. If the relevant skill determination rule is an advanced rule, the relevant skills may be identified by running a script on the work item. Once the relevant skills are identified, a many-to-many (m2m) object may be generated associating the work item with the relevant skills. Agents possessing the identified skills may be identified. If multiple agents are identified, an agent may be selected and the work item added to the selected agent's queue.
The specific embodiments described above have been shown by way of example, and it should be understood that these embodiments may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms. It should be further understood that the claims are not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed, but rather to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.
The techniques presented and claimed herein are referenced and applied to material objects and concrete examples of a practical nature that demonstrably improve the present technical field and, as such, are not abstract, intangible or purely theoretical. Further, if any claims appended to the end of this specification contain one or more elements designated as “means for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ” or “step for [perform]ing [a function] . . . ”, it is intended that such elements are to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f). However, for any claims containing elements designated in any other manner, it is intended that such elements are not to be interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f).