Systems and methods for accessing records via derivative locators

Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for accessing records using derivative locators. An open financial transaction may be initiated by a consumer at a merchant. The merchant may provide information relating to the transaction, which may include information about the consumer's device, to a repository. The merchant may provide transaction information to the acquiring bank, which may provide transaction to the global financial network, which may provide transaction information to an issuing bank. One or more requesting party (e.g., one or more of the acquiring bank, global financial network, or issuing bank) may formulate a derivative locator based on the transaction information received. The derivative locator may function as an index through which records in the repository may be accessed by the requesting party. A time comparison may be made in assisting with accessing the correct record in the repository. The requesting party may determine whether to accept or decline the transaction, optionally with the aid of the information accessed from the repository.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In a commercial transaction, such as an ecommerce transaction, a consumer provides a merchant with several data points. An authorization message is typically sent to a card network and the transaction is routed to an issuer for response. However, there exists a risk of fraudulent transactions.

Challenges remain in detecting these fraudulent transactions. A need exists to provide access to information that may aid in detection of fraudulent transactions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides systems and methods for accessing information via derivative locators. Various aspects of the invention described herein may be applied to any of the particular applications set forth below. The invention may be applied as a standalone financial transaction or ecommerce system or as a component of an integrated fraud detection system or solution. The invention can be optionally integrated into existing business and processes seamlessly, for example, with financial transaction verification parties and flow. It shall be understood that different aspects of the invention can be appreciated individually, collectively or in combination with each other.

An aspect of the invention is directed to a method of accessing records from a repository. The method may comprise receiving transaction information for an open transaction; formulating, with aid of a processor, a derivative locator based on the received transaction information; searching the repository for index information corresponding to the derivative locator; and receiving records from the repository corresponding to the index information. The derivative locator may be formulated based on a credit card number used in the open transaction and a transaction amount from the open transaction. The method may further comprise capturing a request timestamp after receiving the transaction information and prior to searching the repository; and comparing, with aid of a processor, the request timestamp with a stored timestamp in the repository corresponding to the index information.

Aspects of the invention may be directed to a method of approving or not approving a transaction between a user device and a merchant comprising: receiving a derivative locator, wherein said derivative locator is formulated based on transaction information between the user device and the merchant; providing the derivative locator to a repository as an index to the repository; receiving records from the repository corresponding to the index of the repository; determining, with aid of a processor, whether to approve or not approve the transaction based on the records received from the repository; and providing an indicator to approve or not approve the transaction based on the records received from the repository.

An additional aspect of the invention may include a system for accessing records from a repository comprising: a user interface which may accept input relating to an online transaction; a processor configured to formulate a derivative locator based on information about the transaction; and a repository comprising a memory for storing records regarding a user or user device, wherein the records are accessible via an index corresponding to the derivative locator.

Other goals and advantages of the invention will be further appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and accompanying drawings. While the following description may contain specific details describing particular embodiments of the invention, this should not be construed as limitations to the scope of the invention but rather as an exemplification of preferable embodiments. For each aspect of the invention, many variations are possible as suggested herein that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. A variety of changes and modifications can be made within the scope of the invention without departing from the spirit thereof.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1 shows an example of a records access system provided in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 provides an example of a portion of an information access system through which users may interact with the system.

FIG. 3 shows an example of a derivative locator used to access information a repository.

FIG. 4 shows an example of a commercial transaction process in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5 shows an example of a records repository communicating with multiple sources in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 6 shows an example of a records access system utilizing a repository in accordance with another aspect of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the invention. Various modifications to the described embodiments will be apparent to those with skill in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments. The invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments shown and described.

FIG. 1 shows an example of a records access system provided in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. A consumer 105 may interact with a merchant 110. The merchant may send information about the transaction, and/or a device used by the consumer to a repository 120. The merchant may also send information about the transaction and/or the device to an acquiring bank 130. The acquiring bank may send information about the transaction to a global financial network 140 (e.g., card network). The global financial network may send information about the transaction to an issuing bank 150. The acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank may be capable of communicating with the repository. In some embodiments, additional or alternative entities may be involved in the communications and sharing of transaction information. Any of the additional or alternative entities may be capable of communicating with the repository. The acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank may access information in the repository using a derivative locator. The derivative locator may be determined based on information provided to the acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank within a normal pipeline for financial services.

A consumer 105 may interact with a merchant 110. In some embodiments, a consumer may interact with a merchant via one or more device. FIG. 2 provides a further example of how a user, such as a consumer, may interact with a member of the system, such as a merchant. The merchant may have an electronic storefront, and a consumer may be purchasing one or more item online. For example, the electronic storefront may be provided on a website. The device may use a browser or application to permit the consumer to view the electronic storefront. The item may include goods, and/or services. A financial transaction may occur between a consumer and the merchant. The financial transaction may be an online transaction. Any description of a merchant may apply to any provider of goods or services, or party involved in a financial transaction with the consumer. A consumer may be an individual, an entity (e.g., company, corporation, organization), and/or an individual associated with the entity.

The consumer may interact with the merchant by providing a information about the consumer's payment methods. For example, the consumer may provide a credit card number, debit card number, gift card number, coupon number, certificate number, or any other type of payment information.

The consumer 105 may indicate which goods or services are being purchased from the merchant 110. The consumer may utilize the consumer's device and a user interface of the device to select the items for purchase and/or specify information about the financial transaction. In other embodiments, the consumer may be providing finances to the merchant without necessarily buying something (e.g., donation, transfer). Once the consumer is prepared to complete the transaction, the consumer may select a checkout option, or other comparable option.

The merchant 110 may provide information about the transaction and/or device to a repository 120, or alternatively the repository may collect the information from the consumer directly, on behalf of the merchant. In some instances, the repository may receive information directly from the consumer's device. Any description herein of information that is provided to the repository can originate from the merchant, from the consumer, from the consumer's device, or from any third party source. The information provided to the repository may include pre-analyzed information or may include raw information that the repository may analyze, or any combination thereof. The repository may be used to aggregate information and/or analyze the information. In some instances, the repository may analyze information to determine a reputation for a user and/or device. The repository may be used to determine the likelihood of fraud for a particular transaction, or the likely fraudulent user or device.

Transaction information may include personal information about the consumer, specifics about the transaction, and/or information about the device. For example, information about the device used by the consumer may be collected via the merchant or any intermediary third party. In one example, the device may have a local clock that may indicate a time for the device at any point in the transaction. For example, the time according to the clock of the device upon checkout may be collected. The time according to the clock when the consumer selects an option to initiate the checkout may be collected. The time according to the clock when other information relating to the transaction is sent may be collected and sent. The time according to the clock may be collected at one, two, or more points during the transaction. Time zone information about the device may be collected. This may include daylight savings time information. The time of the device relative to a standardized time (e.g., UTC time) may be collected. In some instances an IP address of the device may be collected. Any additional information about the device and/or configuration of the device may be collected. The merchant may provide this information to a central repository.

The merchant may optionally provide merchant data or pre-process the device data and send such information to the repository. For example, the merchant server may have a clock. The difference in time between the device clock and the merchant server clock may be calculated, thereby providing a time difference parameter. The time difference parameter may be sent to the repository. In some embodiments, the repository may have a server or other device which may have a clock. The difference in time between the device clock and the repository clock may be calculated, thereby providing a time difference parameter. In other embodiments, the difference in time may be calculated between the device clock and any reference clock. The reference clock can be a third party clock. The reference clock may be directed to any time zone which may be the same time zone as the device clock or different from the device clock time zone. The reference clock may be synchronized with UTC time. A time difference parameter may be calculated between the device clock and any reference clock. The time difference parameter may be provided to the repository. The time difference parameter may be provided by the device, the merchant server, or any third party. Alternatively, information to calculate the time difference parameter may be provided to the repository, which may perform the time difference calculation and derive the time difference parameter.

Information about the transaction may be provided to the central repository. For example, user information may be provided, such as a user's name, address, telephone number, email, date of birth, credit card number, credit card expiration date. Additional transaction information may be provided, such as items (e.g., goods or services) purchased, the transaction amount, taxes/fees, shipping, promotions/discounts, transaction breakdown, time of transaction, or any other information.

Such information may be stored in the repository 120. Information from the merchant 110 across multiple transactions may be stored in the repository. The repository may receive information from one or multiple merchants. The repository may receive information from additional data sources or parties, which may or may not include acquiring banks, global financial networks, and/or issuing banks. FIG. 5 provides an example of a repository that may be in communication with multiple entities, to be described in greater detail elsewhere herein. The repository may be a central location at which information about devices, transactions, users, or any other related information may be deposited and/or accessed. Information may be aggregated from a single or multiple sources over time. Such information may or may not include indication of a likelihood of a fraudulent device, user, transaction and/or may associate one or more device, user, and/or credit card, with a fraudulent transaction. Some of the data in the central repository may be pre-analyzed to provide an indicator or likelihood of fraud or provide an identity. In some instances, one or more calculation may be made using the raw data. Alternatively, such information may include raw data that the querying party (e.g., acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank) may utilize to determine a likelihood of fraud or provide an indicator of identity. Some information may be used to determine a user and/or device reputation, which may include a good, bad, or neutral reputation. Such determination may be made by the repository. The repository may analyze aggregated information to determine reputation. The reputation may provide insight into how much a user and/or device can be trusted. In some instances, the reputation analysis may yield a reputation score (e.g., numerical value, letter grade, or any other measurement). For example, a reputation score may have a numeral value falling within a range (e.g., 1 to 10, 0 to 100) or a letter grade (e.g., A, B, C, D, E,). An increased score may be provided for users who regularly use the same devices. Information may be associated (e.g., in pairs or groups) and the score may depend on the number of times the associated information is seen together, or how long the associated information has been together. Alternatively, raw information may be provided to a querying party who may use the information to make a reputation determination.

One or more memory storage devices may be provided at a repository 120. A repository may include a single server or a plurality of servers. A repository may include a single database or a plurality of databases. Processing and/or memory storage units may be centralized and/or distributed. In some instances, a cloud computing infrastructure may be provided for the repository. In some instances, the repository may be owned and/or operated by a single entity. Alternatively, the repository may be owned and/or operated by a plurality of entities which may be in communication with one another and/or pooling resources. The repository may be accessible via a network (e.g., local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, telecommunications network, cellular network, data network, or any other type of network).

The merchant 110 may provide information about the transaction to an acquiring bank 130. Such information may be provided concurrently with, subsequent to, or prior to providing information to the repository 120.

The acquiring bank 130 may be the merchant's bank. The acquiring bank may hold an account for the merchant, and may receive funds at the account. The acquiring bank may receive funds from an issuing bank (e.g., directly or indirectly). The information provided to the acquiring bank may be a subset of the information provided to the repository. Less information and/or some different information may be provided to the acquiring bank than the repository. Some of the information may be provided to both the acquiring bank and the repository. In some instances, the information provided to the acquiring bank may be information provided in a normal pipeline of financial transaction verification. For example, the information may include credit card number, credit card expiration date, name on the credit card, transaction amount, and/or items that were ordered. Such information need not include any specialized index or record locator in addition to the normal information that is provided in the course of financial transaction verification. Such information need not include any specialized device identification information. In some instances, funds transactions reports and/or chargeback reports may be provided between the merchant and the acquiring bank. Such reports may include any of the information described herein.

The acquiring bank 130 may provide information about the transaction to a global financial network 140. The global financial network may be a card network, such as VISA, Mastercard, AMEX, Discover, Diners, etc. The information provided to the global financial network may be a subset of the information provided to the repository 120 and/or the acquiring bank. Less information and/or some different information may be provided to the global financial network than the repository and/or the acquiring bank. Some of the information may be provided to both the global financial network and the acquiring bank. In some instances, the information provided to the global financial network may be information provided in a normal pipeline of financial transaction verification. For example, the information may include credit card number, credit card expiration date, name on the credit card, and/or transaction amount, like in ISO 8583 protocol, see e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8583 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Such information need not include any specialized index or record locator that was shared with the merchant at the moment the transaction initiated, in addition to the normal information that is provided in the course of financial transaction verification. Such information need not include any specialized device identification information. After the merchant initiated an authorization request, and it may traverse the system, via acquiring bank, global network, issuing bank and all the way back—a record locator may be created and shared by all parties. However, this payment network record locator need not be present at the beginning of the transaction. In some instances, settlement files may be transferred between the acquiring bank and the global financial network. The settlement files may include the information described herein.

The global financial network 140 may provide information about the transaction to an issuing bank 150. The issuing bank may be the consumer's credit card bank. The issuing bank may be an institution for the consumer's payment method (e.g., credit card, debit card, gift card, etc.). The issuing bank may have funds retrieved therefrom, and sent to an acquiring bank (e.g., directly or indirectly). The consumer may have an account at the issuing bank, which may transfer funds from the account. The funds may be transferred from the consumer's account at the issuing bank to the merchant's account at the acquiring bank. The information provided to the issuing bank may be a subset of the information provided to the repository 120 and/or the global financial network. Less information and/or some different information may be provided to the issuing bank than the repository and/or the global financial network. Some of the information may be provided to both the issuing bank and the global financial network. In some instances, the information provided to the issuing bank may be information provided in a normal pipeline of financial transaction verification. For example, the information may include credit card number, credit card expiration date, name on the credit card, and/or transaction amount. Such information need not include any specialized index or record locator in addition to the normal information that is provided in the course of financial transaction verification. Such information need not include any specialized device identification information. In some instances, settlement files may be transferred between the global financial network and the issuing bank. The settlement files may include the information described herein.

In some instances, an issuing bank may ultimately send a billing statement to a consumer.

A derivative locator may be determined based on information provided in the normal pipeline of financial transaction verification. Additional embodiments or details relating to the derivative record locator may be provided in FIG. 3 or elsewhere herein. In one example, a derivative locator may be formed based on a consumer's credit card information (e.g., credit card number) and transaction amount (e.g., dollar amount, Euro amount, other currency amount). The derivative record locator may be the credit card number and transaction amount appended together. For example, the derivative record locator may be a concatenation of the credit card number and transaction amount. In other embodiments, a hash string or other identifier may be calculated or derived based on the credit card number only and the transaction amount will remain in the clear, and/or hashed separately (e.g., may or may not concatenated with the credit card).

The derivative locator may be used as an index to access one or more records in a repository. For example, transaction records, which may include device records may be stored in the repository and may be associated with an index corresponding to the derivative locator (e.g., credit card number+transaction amount). The records may be searched for a corresponding index (e.g., corresponding credit card number+transaction amount), and associated information may be accessed and/or pulled. Such associated information may be associated with the present transaction, user and/or the device used for the transaction. Associated information may also include analyzed information relating to the transaction, user and/or the device. Such analyzed information may include an indication of a likelihood of fraud and/or reputation information.

A time component may be provided. For example, the time when the request is made to access the repository records may be determined. A timestamp may be taken. The timestamp may be based on a clock of the requesting party (e.g., issuing bank, global financial network, and/or acquiring bank). The timestamp may be based on a clock of the repository and/or the merchant. The timestamp may be taken at a time a derivative locator is formed. The timestamp may be associated with the derivative locator. Alternatively, as the speed of the transaction in a real-time system is fast, when any party requests information from the repository, using the derivative locator—the look-back window to search for such a transaction can be limited to a short amount of time from “now”, or the moment the repository receives the data request. This allows the time look-back to be dynamic, removing the need to send specific timestamps in the authorization message.

The timestamp may be compared to one or more timestamp provided in the records. For example, the time that a consumer selects a checkout option and/or sends information to the repository, one or more timestamp may be taken and/or stored in the repository. The new timestamp may be compared to the time data stored in the repository. If the difference between the new timestamp and the original timestamp does not exceed a threshold amount, then a transaction in the repository may be determined to be corresponding. Any time difference threshold may be selected or predetermined. For example, the difference between the look-up time and the repository record creation and/or check out may be less than or equal to about 1 minute, 30 seconds, 15 seconds, 10 seconds, 8 seconds, 5 seconds, 3 seconds, 2 seconds, 1 second, 0.5 seconds, or 0.1 seconds.

The time threshold comparison may be useful in situations where multiple transactions have been provided for a credit card, wherein the transaction amounts are substantially the same amount. The time threshold may provide an increased likelihood that the derivative locator is a unique identifier of a record in the repository corresponding to the particular threshold.

A derivative locator may be formed and/or timestamp may be taken at one or multiple points in the process. For example, the issuing bank 150 may attempt to access information in the repository 120. The issuing bank may form the derivative locator based on information available to the issuing bank. For example, the issuing bank may form a derivative locator based on the credit card number and transaction amount. A timestamp may be taken. The issuing bank may use the derivative locator to access information associated in the repository associated with the corresponding derivative locator. The timestamp may be compared to one or more indicator of the time that a record in the repository was created. If the look-up timestamp is recent enough, the likelihood that the derivative locator corresponds to the record created for the same transaction is very high or increased. The issuing bank may review the information from the data repository. The information from the data repository may include an indicator of a likelihood of fraud, or may be analyzed by the issuing bank to determine a likelihood of fraud. The information from the data repository may include an indicator of device and/or user reputation, or be analyzed by the issuing bank to determine the device and/or user reputation. Reputation information may or may not be used in the determination of likelihood of fraud, and vice versa. The issuing bank may make a determination whether to accept or decline the financial transaction, based at least partially on information provided by the repository. For example if information from the repository indicates suspicious behavior or a low reputation, the issuing bank may decide to decline the financial transaction. The issuing bank may make the determination in an automated fashion with aid of a processor, without requiring human intervention. Alternatively, the bank may include one or more users reviewing information and assisting with the determination. The indication of whether the issuing bank accepts or declines the transaction may be sent to the global financial network, which may pass it on to the acquiring bank, which may relay it to the merchant. The merchant interface may display to the consumer whether the transaction was accepted or declined. In some instances, the consumer may be prompted for additional information that may be required in order for the transaction to proceed.

In some instances, the derivative locator and/or timestamp may be taken via the global financial network 140. For example, the global financial network may attempt to access information in the repository 120. The global financial network may form the derivative locator based on information available to the global financial network. For example, the global financial network may form a derivative locator based on the credit card number and transaction amount. A timestamp may be taken. The global financial network may use the derivative locator to access information associated in the repository associated with the corresponding derivative locator. The timestamp may be compared to one or more indicator of the time that a record in the repository was created. If the look-up timestamp is recent enough, the likelihood that the derivative locator corresponds to the record created for the same transaction is very high or increased. The global financial network may review the information from the data repository. The information from the data repository may include an indicator of a likelihood of fraud, or may be analyzed by the global financial network to determine a likelihood of fraud. The information from the data repository may include an indicator of device and/or user reputation, or be analyzed by the global financial network to determine the device and/or user reputation. Reputation information may or may not be used in the determination of likelihood of fraud, and vice versa. The global financial network may make a determination whether to accept or decline the financial transaction, based at least partially on information provided by the repository. For example if information from the repository indicates suspicious behavior, the global financial network may decide to decline the financial transaction. The global financial network may make the determination in an automated fashion with aid of a processor, without requiring human intervention. Alternatively, the global financial network may include one or more users reviewing information and assisting with the determination. The indication of whether the global financial network accepts or declines the transaction may be sent to the acquiring bank, which may relay it to the merchant. The merchant interface may display to the consumer whether the transaction was accepted or declined. In some instances, the consumer may be prompted for additional information that may be required in order for the transaction to proceed.

Additionally or alternatively, the derivative locator and/or timestamp may be taken via the acquiring bank 130. For example, the acquiring bank may attempt to access information in the repository 120. The acquiring bank may form the derivative locator based on information available to the acquiring bank. For example, the acquiring bank may form a derivative locator based on the credit card number and transaction amount. A timestamp may be taken. The acquiring bank may use the derivative locator to access information associated in the repository associated with the corresponding derivative locator. The timestamp may be compared to one or more indicator of the time that a record in the repository was created. If the look-up timestamp is recent enough, the likelihood that the derivative locator corresponds to the record created for the same transaction is very high or increased. The acquiring bank may review the information from the data repository. The information from the data repository may include an indicator of a likelihood of fraud, or may be analyzed by the acquiring bank to determine a likelihood of fraud. The information from the data repository may include an indicator of device and/or user reputation, or be analyzed by the acquiring bank to determine the device and/or user reputation. Reputation information may or may not be used in the determination of likelihood of fraud, and vice versa. The acquiring bank may make a determination whether to accept or decline the financial transaction, based at least partially on information provided by the repository. For example if information from the repository indicates suspicious behavior, the acquiring bank may decide to decline the financial transaction. The acquiring bank may make the determination in an automated fashion with aid of a processor, without requiring human intervention. Alternatively, the acquiring bank may include one or more users reviewing information and assisting with the determination. The indication of whether the global acquiring bank accepts or declines the transaction may be sent to the merchant. The merchant interface may display to the consumer whether the transaction was accepted or declined. In some instances, the consumer may be prompted for additional information that may be required in order for the transaction to proceed.

Thus, one, two, three or more of the acquiring bank 130, global financial network 140, or issuing bank 150 may access the repository 120. The acquiring bank 130, global financial network 140, and/or issuing bank 150 may provide a derivative locator to access the repository. The derivate locators may be the same between the acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or the issuing bank. The derivative locator may be unique or pseudo-unique and provide the desired lookup.

FIG. 2 provides an example of a portion of an information access system through which users may interact with the system. One or more devices 210a, 210b, 210c may be in communication with one or more servers 230 of the information access system over a network 220.

One or more user 205 may be capable of interacting with the system via a device 210a, 210b, 210c. In some embodiments, the user may be a consumer. The user may be an individual attempting to initiate a financial transaction. The user may be attempting to purchase goods or services online. The user may use a credit card, debit card, pre-paid card, gift card, bank routing number, or other type of financial payment techniques or instruments. [0044] The device may be a computer 210a, laptop, or mobile device (e.g., tablet 210b, smartphone 210c, cell phone, personal digital assistant) or any other type of device. The device may be a networked device. The device may have a memory, processor, and/or display. The memory may be capable of storing persistent and/or transient data. Those persistent and/or transient data may be stored in the cloud. Non-transitory computer readable media containing code, logic, or instructions for one or more steps described herein may be stored in memory. The processor may be capable of carrying out one or more steps described herein. For example, the processor may be capable of executing the non-transitory computer readable media. A display may show data and/or permit user interaction. For example, the display may include a screen, such as a touchscreen, through which the user may be able to view content. The display may be capable of displaying images (e.g., still or video), text. The device may be capable of providing audio content. The display may include a user interface capable of displaying a web browser or application. For example, the device may display a merchant website through which a user may purchase goods or services.

The device may be able to receive an input from a user. For example, a device may have or accept input from a computer, mouse, joystick, trackball, pointer, pen, microphone, motion sensor, optical sensor, infrared sensor, capacitive sensor, pressure sensor, camera, touchscreen, or any other input device. The user may be able to enter information relating to a transaction via any input device.

The device may have a clock or other timekeeping device. The device clock may indicate a time for the device, which may or may not correspond to an objective time for a location of the device. The device clock may or may not be synchronized with other clocks. The device may have an Internet Protocol (IP) address.

The device 210a, 210b, 210c may be capable of communicating with a server 230. Any description of a server may apply to one or more servers and/or databases. The one or more servers may include a memory and/or programmable processor. A plurality of devices may communicate with the one or more servers. Such communications may be serial and/or simultaneous. The server may be a merchant server. The server may be owned and/or operated by the merchant.

The programmable processor of the server may execute one or more steps as provided therein. Any actions or steps described herein may be performed with the aid of a programmable processor. Human intervention may not be required in automated steps. The programmable processor may be useful for analyzing user input and/or managing transaction and/or device information. The server may also include memory comprising non-transitory computer readable media with code, logic, instructions for executing one or more of the steps provided herein.

The server may have a clock or other timekeeping device. The server clock may indicate a time for the server, which may or may not correspond to an objective time for the location of the server. The server clock may or may not be synchronized with other clocks.

The device 210a, 210b, 210c may communicate with the server 230 via a network 220, such as a wide area network (e.g., the Internet), a local area network, or telecommunications network (e.g., cellular phone network or data network). The device and/or server may have a wired or wireless transceiver and/or assembly that may expedite communications over the network. Communication may also be intermediated by a third party.

In one example, a user may be interacting with the server via an application or website. For example, the user may be viewing and/or purchasing items, via the user's device. A user interface may be provided via a display of the user's device. The user may provide personal information about the user. The user may provide the user's credit card information. Information about the user, transaction, and/or device may be collected (e.g. on the browser side or through an application on the device). The information may be collected and provided to the server. The server may or may not perform analysis of the collected information and/or provide additional calculations. For example, the server may calculate a difference in time between the device clock and the server clock. Information collected and provided to the server may include a timestamp from the device, which may be compared with a timestamp from the server. The difference in time may be a parameter that may be shared with one or more additional data repositories. The server may communicate with one or more additional entity servers or repositories over a network, such as networks described elsewhere herein.

FIG. 3 shows an example of a derivative locator used to access information a repository. A current transaction (e.g., transaction N) may be underway and pending approval of a checkout. A derivative record locator may be derived from information accessible to one or more financial party. Such information may include financial transaction information that is provided to the financial parties within the normal pipeline of a transaction. In one example, a derivative record locator (N) may be formed based on the credit card number and transaction amount for the current transaction. The derivative locator may be any form of locator that is derived from the credit card number and transaction amount. Additional information may or may not be included in forming the derivative locator. In one example, the credit card number and transaction amount may be appended together. For example, if the credit card number is: 1234567812345678, and the transaction amount is $79.18, the derivative locator may be 123456781234567879.18 or 79.181234567812345678, or a hashed value of the credit card ABCDE12345 and 79.18, or any other combination thereof. In other examples, one or more calculation may be performed. A hash string may be generated using the credit card number and transaction amount or other factors. A mathematical calculation may be performed using the credit card number and transaction amount or other factors. Alphanumeric or other representations of the credit card number and transaction amount or other factors may be provided. The derivative locator may be stored in a memory of the repository. The derivative locator may be stored in the memory and associated with or linked to related records in the repository.

Any description herein of a credit card may also apply to debit cards, pre-paid cards, gift cards, routing numbers, or any other financial identifier. For example, the derivative locator may be formulated based on a debit card number and transaction amount.

A timestamp (N) may be made when attempting to find a record in the repository. The timestamp may be taken when formulating the derivative locator. The timestamp may be indicative of a time of a requesting party (e.g., issuing bank, global financial network, or acquiring bank) clock, repository clock, or merchant clock. The timestamp (N) of the current transaction may be indicative of the time at which the repository is being accessed.

A repository may include information from one or more merchants relating to one or more transactions. The repository may include information from other data sources. The repository may include information from the current transaction (N). The information from the current transaction (N) may have been provided by the merchant in the current transaction. The information from the current transaction may be associated with or combined with other information already in the repository. One or more common hook may be provided between the associated information. For example, the repository may include information about the device used in the current transaction. Other information relating to the same device (or a device identified as likely being the same device) from other transactions (e.g., with the same or different merchants) may also be associated with the current transaction information. In another example, the repository may include information about the credit card used in the current transaction. Other information relating to the same credit card from other transactions (e.g., with the same or different merchants, with the same or different device) may be associated with the current transaction information.

Alternatively, the transaction information may be standalone and need not be associated with other information outside the various transactions.

In some embodiments, a device locator may be generated each time a transaction is initiated and information is sent to the repository. For example, for a transaction 1, a derivative locator (DLI) may be generated and stored in the repository. A corresponding timestamp (T1) may be stored in the repository. Associated transaction information (e.g., information relating to the user, device, credit card, financials, transaction specifics) may be stored in the repository and may be associated with the derivative locator (DLI) and corresponding timestamp (T1). For other transactions (e.g., transaction 2), its own derivative locator (DL2) and associated timestamp (T2) may be stored in the repository. Information associated with the transaction (e.g., transaction 2) may be associated with its derivative locator (DL2) and timestamp (T2). Associated derivate locators and/or timestamps may be associated with each of the transaction records in the repository. The derivative locators may form a searchable field or index through which to access associated transaction information from the repository.

In the current transaction (N), a derivative locator (DLN) may be formulated based on information available to the party requesting information from the repository. The derivative locator (DLN) may be compared with one or more derivative locators in the repository (DLI, DL2, DL3, . . . ). When a match is found, the associated information may be accessed by the requesting party.

In some embodiments, one or more timestamp may be utilized before providing information to the requesting party. In one example, the derivative locators may be relatively unique, but may not be completely unique. For instance, the derivative locators may be a combination of a credit card number and transaction amount. It is possible that the same credit card was used in multiple transactions that have the same transaction amounts (e.g., for credit card 1234567812345678, two purchases for $79.18 were made, one in the current transaction and one last month).

In order to ensure access to the correct current transaction information in the repository, timestamps may be compared. The difference between the timestamp when requesting the repository information (e.g., TN) and the timestamp stored in the repository for the corresponding derivative locator may be calculated (e.g., if DL4 corresponds to DLN, the difference between T4 and TN may be determined). If the difference in the timestamps does not exceed a time threshold value, then the record with the corresponding derivative locator may be determined to be the record for the transaction and may be accessed by or sent to the requesting party. If the difference in timestamps does exceed the time threshold value, then the transaction in the repository likely refers to a separate transaction, and this transaction information is not accessed. For example, the transfer of information within the system (e.g., between the merchant, acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank) may occur rapidly. The transfer of information may occur in an automated fashion with aid of a processor, without requiring human intervention. The time threshold value may be greater than the anticipated time for information to travel from the merchant to the requesting party. For example, the time threshold value may be on the order of tens of seconds or less, or seconds or less. For example, if the derivative locators match, and the timestamp in the repository indicates that transaction record was created at 01:00:01.00, and the timestamp with the request indicates that the current time is 01:00:01.10, then it is likely that the record in the repository belongs to the current transaction.

The time threshold value may be predetermined and/or preset. Alternatively, the time threshold value may vary in response to one or more input. The time threshold may be dictated by the repository system. Alternatively, the time threshold value may be determined per requesting party (e.g., issuing bank, global financial network, acquiring bank).

FIG. 4 shows an example of a commercial transaction process in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. One or more of the following steps may occur in the order presented, or in alternative orders. One or more of the steps may be optional. One or more additional steps may be provided or may be used in alternative to any of the steps described.

A consumer may select one or more item to purchase from a merchant. The consumer may be at the merchant website or application. The consumer may be accessing the merchant website or application using a device. The consumer may have filled up a virtual shopping bag with one or more items of goods or services. The items listed in the virtual shopping bag may be representative of physical goods or real-life services to be performed. Consumer financial information (e.g., consumer credit card information) may be entered by the consumer or may be pre-stored on the consumer's merchant account.

The consumer may select a checkout option. Once the consumer has selected the checkout option, the consumer may await confirmation or denial of the transaction. The entire confirmation or denial process may optionally occur in a rapid fashion. The confirmation or denial process may occur automatically with aid of one or more processors, and may or may not require human intervention. One or more of the steps described herein may be performed with aid of a programmable processor. In some instances, the entire process may take a few minutes or less, one minute or less, 30 seconds or less, 15 seconds or less, 10 seconds or less, 5 seconds or less, 3 seconds or less, 2 seconds or less, or 1 second or less.

When a consumer has selected a checkout option, the merchant may provide information to a central repository. The provided information may include information about the user (e.g., user name, address, contact information, date of birth, etc.), information specific to the transaction (e.g., transaction amount, items purchased in the transaction, fees, shipping, address, breakdown, taxes, promotions/discounts), and/or information about the device (e.g., device timestamp information, device time zone, IP address, other device configurations). The merchant may or may not perform any calculations from the merchant end (e.g., calculating a time difference parameter between based on time differences between the consumer device and a merchant server or other reference clock). The merchant may optionally provide information from the merchant server that may be used by the repository or other entity for analysis (e.g., sending merchant server clock time, and having the repository or requesting party calculate the difference between the device clock time and server or other reference clock time). The information provided to the repository may be useful in determining the likelihood of a fraudulent transaction and/or determining the reputation of the device or user. One or more discrepancies may be inherent within the transaction information (e.g., the device may be in a first time zone, while the credit card is addressed to an individual living in a different time zone). Optionally, transaction records within the repository may be linked or compared, or incorporated into one another (e.g., it may be noted that a particular credit card is typically associated with a particular device, device information may be compared to determine if different transactions occurred using the same device, user information may be compared to determine if different transactions were performed by the same user, or any combination thereof). Information within the central repository may be provided by the merchant in the current transaction. The repository may also include information from other merchants and/or from other transactions. The repository may also include information provided by other data sources. The repository may be updated in real-time. In some instances, the repository may provide an indication of a likelihood of fraud for a transaction, device, and/or user. This may incorporate the real-time information collected from one or more sources. The repository may provide reputation information for a device and/or user. The reputation information may incorporate the real-time information collected from one or more sources. The reputation information and/or fraud information may be determined separately or based on one another, and may optionally be provided in conjunction.

When a consumer has selected a checkout option, the merchant may provide information about the transaction to an acquiring bank. The merchant may provide information to the acquiring bank subsequent to, prior to, or concurrently with providing information to the repository. In some instances, it may be desirable to provide information to the repository first in order to ensure that the information is already in the repository if the acquiring bank decides to request information from the repository. Information may be provided to the acquiring bank in the usual process of confirming financial transaction information. Such information may include but is not limited to credit card number, name on the credit card, credit card expiration date, or transaction amount.

The acquiring bank may send transaction information to a global financial network. This may occur subsequent to the acquiring bank receiving transaction information from the merchant. Information may be provided to the global financial network in the usual process of confirming financial transaction information. Such information may include but is not limited to credit card number, name on the credit card, credit card expiration date, or transaction amount.

The global financial network may send transaction information to an issuing bank. This may occur subsequent to the global financial network receiving transaction information from the acquiring bank. Information may be provided to the issuing bank in the usual process of confirming financial transaction information. Such information may include but is not limited to credit card number, name on the credit card, credit card expiration date, or transaction amount.

The issuing bank may access data in the repository using the received transaction information. For example, at least a portion of the received transaction information may be used to formulate a derivative locator for accessing the records. For example, the received transaction information may include a credit card number and transaction amount (e.g., dollar amount or other currency amount). A derivative record locator may be formulated from the information. The derivative locator may match one or more derivative locators stored in the repository as indices to one or more records. A request timestamp may be generated when the issuing bank formulates the derivative locator and/or requests information from the repository. The records in the repository may include one or more stored timestamps indicative of when information was provided to the repository. The request timestamp may be compared with the stored timestamp. If not too much time has elapsed between the stored timestamp and the request timestamp, the corresponding records with matching derivative locators are determined to belong to the current (open, pending) transaction. The issuing bank may access the records in the repository associated with the matching derivative locators that fall within the acceptable time threshold. The repository may provide the issuing bank with any transaction-related information and/or information about the device and/or user. Linked and/or analyzed information from the repository, such as fraud or reputation information may be provided.

The issuing bank may accept or decline the transaction. The issuing bank may make a determination to accept or decline based on the information accessed from the repository. For example, the repository may include information that may assist with the determination of whether the transaction is likely to be fraudulent or not, or provide a reputation of the user and/or device. For example, the repository may include one or more “red flag” that may be indicative of low reputation, suspicious behavior or likely fraudulent transaction. This “red flag” information may be conveyed to the issuing bank. The issuing bank may or may not perform analytics of the information from the repository to determine whether a “red flag” is present. Such analysis may occur with aid of a programmable processor. If no red flags are detected, the issuing bank may decide to accept the transaction. The issuing bank may make notification of the acceptance of the transaction to the global financial network, which may convey the acceptance to the acquiring bank, which may convey acceptance to the merchant. The merchant may then close the transaction and indicate to the consumer that the transaction has been accepted. If one or more red flags may be detected, the issuing bank may determine whether the risk of fraudulent transaction is acceptable or not. If the risk is low enough to be acceptable, the transaction may be accepted, and parties may be notified accordingly. If the level of risk is too high, the issuing bank may decline the transaction and may inform the respective parties accordingly. The merchant may be informed that the transaction is denied. The merchant may inform the consumer that the transaction is denied.

The issuing bank is provided as an example of a requesting party of information from the repository. In other embodiments, the acquiring bank and/or the global financial network may request information from the repository. Similar techniques may be utilized. For example, the acquiring bank and/or global financial network may formulate a derivate locator based on received transaction information. The acquiring bank and/or global financial network may have a request timestamp. The timestamp may be compared with timestamps in the data repository, and the derivative locators may be compared with derivate locators in the repository. Corresponding information for the current (e.g., open, pending) transaction may be provided to the requesting party (e.g., acquiring bank and/or global financial network). Other related information from the repository (e.g., relating to the transaction, device, user, likelihood of fraud, reputation) may be provided to the requesting party. The requesting party may receive or analyze the information to determine whether to accept or decline the transaction. The transaction may be accepted or declined at any point along the process. The respective parties may be notified. In some instances, for a transaction to be completed and accepted, all parties (e.g., acquiring bank, global financial network, and issuing bank) may accept the transaction. A decline of the transaction at any point in the process may result in the entire transaction being declined.

Any of the steps described herein may be performed with the aid of a processor. In some instances, one or more of the steps may occur automatically without requiring human interaction. One or more computations or steps described herein may be performed in response to non-transitory computer readable media with code, logic, or instructions for performing the one or more steps.

FIG. 5 provides an example of a repository that may be in communication with multiple entities. As previously described one or more sources may provide information to a repository 520, which may include one or more merchant 510a, 510b, 510c, one or more devices, one or more financial entity, or other sources. Information from the repository may accessed by one or more querying party, which may include financial entities 560a, 560b, 560c (e.g., issuing bank, acquiring bank, global financial networks) or any other entities (e.g., merchants, user devices).

Information may be provided by one or more multiple sources and collected within the repository. The information may be aggregated and/or analyzed at the repository. Information from various transactions or sources relating to the devices that are likely to be the same device, and/or users likely to be the same user may be linked or associated with one another. In some instances, a reputation score may be determined and/or associated with the respective transactions, devices, and/or user records. The repository may take advantage of information from various sources and bring them together to provide an comprehensive and up-to-date analysis.

One or more sources may provide information to a repository. The one or more sources may or may not access information from the repository. In some instances, an entity may provide information to the repository without accessing or using information from the repository, may access or use information from the repository without providing information to the repository, or may both provide information to the repository and access or use information from the repository. The one or more sources may be owned and/or operated by different entities, such as companies or subsidiaries thereof. In some examples, various merchants may provide information to the repository from various merchant transactions and may use the information from the repository. Thus, merchants communicating with the repository may share information with one another via the repository. Similarly, various banks, global financial networks, or other financial entities may provide information to the repository and may use information from the repository. The financial entities may provide information relating to a user's financials, merchant's financials, or any transactions. Thus, the financial entities communicating with the repository may share information with one another via the repository. The merchants and financial entities may share information with one another, and optionally additional entities, via the repository.

The systems and methods described herein may advantageously permit the access of information that may assist with the determination of whether a financial transaction may be fraudulent or not. The repository may serve as a central data repository where information may be gathered across multiple transaction (e.g., across one or multiple merchants). This may permit the sharing of data which may reveal patterns or indicators of fraud or suspicious behavior. The sharing of data may also assist with formulating a reputation for devices and/or users over time. The reputation may be based on device information without being based on user information, user information without being based on device information, or based on both device and user information. Optionally, the reputation may be determined without requiring the use of a user's personal information.

The sharing of data may permit a device and/or user's reputation to follow him or her to an interaction with a new entity, such as a new merchant. Thus, even if it is a user or device's first time interacting with a merchant, the user may have a positive, negative, or neutral reputation based on the shared data. In some instances, the shared data may include a reputation indicator, such as a score. The reputation of a user and/or device may be indicative of a risk associated with interacting with the user and/or device. In some instances, negative reputations may be relevant for determining a likelihood of fraud.

Positive reputations may be useful for verifying or authenticating an individual or device. In some instances, positive reputation scores may be useful for identifying good users or devices, which may afford specialized status or treatment. In some instances, positive reputations may result in confirmation of a transaction with fewer checks or delay. In some instances, a positive reputation may enable a user to be approved for a transaction with fewer checks or delay, even if it is the first time or one of the first times that a user is interacting with a particular party (e.g., merchant). This may save efforts on the merchant side to verify the user and permit the merchant to allocate efforts elsewhere. This may also save time for the user, and permit rapid verification and/or approval for transactions. Having a positive reputation may enable a user to go through and participate in a transaction during a denial of service attack. Other examples of specialized status or treatments may include the offer of discounts, cash, rewards, coupons, free shipping, no or less wait-time, special access, higher level of service, or any other type of specialized treatment. Having a positive reputation may enable the user to received the specialized status or treatment without any or with very little investigation from the merchant, by leveraging historical information about the user and/or device collected from various merchants.

Good or bad reputation information may be useful when a user is opening an account, logging into an account (e.g., being authenticated), or is a new or repeat buyer (e.g., undertaking a transaction). Historical reputation information from a data repository can be used to approve or not approve a transaction. This may advantageously permit increased sales and approval rates for the entire system, and increase customer satisfaction. More transactions may be approved through the use of repository data. This may also decrease fraud losses over the system, and decrease operational costs.

Longitudinal data collected over time may be useful for the determination of fraud or reputation. The repository may include information relating to the consumer's device used in the transaction. The device information may be useful for assessing a risk of fraud or determining a reputation.

In typical financial transactions, certain information may be conveyed between parties (e.g., merchant, acquiring bank—such as merchant bank; global financial network—such as Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Diners, or others; and issuing bank—such as consumer's credit card bank) The information provided within the normal pipeline for financial transactions may include the consumer's credit card and transaction information. It may be desirable for the parties to access additional information about the transaction, device, and/or user which may be useful for the parties to assess risk of fraud prior to accepting or declining the financial transaction. However, it may not be desirable to alter the existing information pipeline between the parties. Thus, informational infrastructure challenges may be presented if the additional information (such as device information, or a foreign key index to records in the repository) was conveyed by the merchant to the other parties. This may require restructuring of data storage systems in various parties. Systems and methods provided herein permits a data repository to aggregate and/or analyze information provided from one or more sources, which may be accessible by various querying parties without altering the existing information pipeline between the parties. A likelihood of fraud and/or reputation can be determined and take full advantage of the aggregated information without having to alter the existing information pipeline.

Thus, the system provided herein may advantageously permit the use of the existing data pipelines, but permit the requesting parties to access additional information (e.g., provided in an repository) that may assist with determination of whether there is a fraudulent transaction. The existing data may be used to formulate the record locator which can be used to access the additional information.

FIG. 6 provides an additional illustration of a records access system utilizing a repository in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. A user 605 may use a device 607 to interact with a merchant 610. The user may use the device to facilitate a transaction with the merchant. The transaction may be a financial transaction. In some instances, the user device may have a processor, a memory, and a user interface through which the user may interact with the device. The user device may have a communication assembly through which the device may communicate with a device of the merchant, e.g., merchant sever. [0083] In one example, a user 605 may provide the user's credit card (or debit card, gift card, or other financial payment) information to the merchant through the device 607. The user may select a submit option to open the transaction. The transaction may remain open until it is approved by the user's issuing bank. The merchant 610 may send information about the transaction to an acquiring bank 630. The acquiring bank may have a device (e.g., server, databases) having a processor and memory. The memory may store information about the merchant's financial records. The acquiring bank may send information about the transaction to a global financial network 640. The global financial network may have a device (e.g., server, databases) having a processor and memory. The global financial network may send information about the transaction to an issuing bank 650. The issuing bank may have a device (e.g., server, databases) having a processor and memory. The memory may store information about the user's financial records.

In some instances, a derivative locator 680 may be formulated based on the transaction information. The derivative locator may be formed by the merchant, repository, acquiring bank, global financial network, issuing bank, user device, or any other entity. The derivative locator may be formulated based on the transaction information that is passed on to the acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank. The derivative locator may be formulated by accessing memory storage units of the merchant, repository, acquiring bank, global financial network, issuing bank, user device, or any other entity. The derivative locator may be formulated with aid of a processor of the merchant, repository, acquiring bank, global financial network, issuing bank, user device, or any other entity. Examples of derivative locators are provided elsewhere herein.

A repository 620 is provided through which a merchant 610 may communicate. Two-way communication may be provided between the repository and the merchant. In some instances, communication between a merchant and repository may occur over a network 660, which as a local area network, wide area network (e.g., Internet), telecommunications network, cellular network, data network, or any other type of network. Alternatively such communications may occur directly. One or more merchants may be capable of communicating with the repository over the network. The one or more merchants may communicate with the repository simultaneously. A derivative locator 680 may be used during locations between the merchant and the repository. The merchant may use the derivative locator to access records in the repository. The derivative locator may serve as an index of records in the repository.

In some instances, the merchant 610 may provide information to the repository 620. The merchant may provide information about the user 605, user device 607, and/or transaction. In some instances, the merchant may provide information about whether a transaction was approved or not approved. The merchant may provide information about whether a transaction went through smoothly or whether any red flags occurred during or after the transaction. In some instances, the information from the merchant may be coupled with a derivative locator when sent to the repository. The derivative locator may be formulated by the merchant. Alternatively, information may be sent to the repository, and the derivative locator may be formulated at the repository using the information from the merchant.

In some embodiments an issuing bank 650 may communicate with the repository 620. Two-way communication may be provided between the issuing bank and the repository. In some instances, communication between the issuing bank and the repository may occur over a network, or may occur directly. One or more banks or other financial entities may be capable of communicating with the repository over the network. The one or more banks or other financial entities may communicate with the repository simultaneously. A derivative locator 680 may be used during locations between the bank and the repository. The bank may use the derivative locator to access records in the repository. The derivative locator may serve as an index of records in the repository. In some examples, an issuing bank may formulate a derivative locator based on information passed from the merchant through the acquiring bank and global financial network.

In some instances, the issuing bank 650, acquiring bank, global financial network, or any other type of entity may provide information to the repository 620. The bank or any other financial entity may provide information about the user 605, user device 607, the user's finances, and/or transaction. In some instances, the bank may provide information about whether a transaction was approved or not approved. The bank may provide information about whether an approval went through smoothly or whether any red flags occurred during or after the transaction. In some instances, the information from the bank may be coupled with a derivative locator when sent to the repository. The derivative locator may be formulated by the bank. The derivative locator may be formulated based on transaction information passed from the merchant to the bank through any intervening entities. Alternatively, information may be sent to the repository, and the derivative locator may be formulated at the repository using the information from the bank.

The derivative locator may be formulated by any entity along the transaction and/or transaction approval process. The derivative locator may be formulated based on information accessible by any entity along the transaction approval process. Information accessible by the entities along the transaction approval process may be used to formulate the derivative locator at the repository.

Any entity accessing the repository may access information provided to the repository by any other entity. Access and/or storage of information may be governed by a derivative locator which may be formulated on information that is accessible to the entities. In some instances, all entities of the system may have access to the information used to formulate the derivative locator. In some instances, the user device, merchant, acquiring bank, global financial network, and/or issuing bank may receive or have access to the information used to formulate the derivative locator. The information stored in the repository may be useful to determine whether to approve a transaction between a user device and a merchant. The information stored in the repository may be useful to determine whether to approve a transaction between a user and any entity that may have access to the repository. The information stored in the repository may include reputation information for the user and/or user device.

Any of the entities described herein may have a clock or other time-keeping device. For example a user device may have a local device clock, a merchant may have a merchant server clock, an acquiring bank may have an acquiring bank server clock, a global financial network may have a global financial network server clock, and/or an issuing bank may have an issuing bank server clock. The repository may or may not have a repository clock. Times from the clocks may be useful to access records within the repository. In some instances, a combination of the derivative locator and time information (e.g., based on one or more clocks) may be useful for accessing records within the repository.

It should be understood from the foregoing that, while particular implementations have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made thereto and are contemplated herein. It is also not intended that the invention be limited by the specific examples provided within the specification. While the invention has been described with reference to the aforementioned specification, the descriptions and illustrations of the preferable embodiments herein are not meant to be construed in a limiting sense. Furthermore, it shall be understood that all aspects of the invention are not limited to the specific depictions, configurations or relative proportions set forth herein which depend upon a variety of conditions and variables. Various modifications in form and detail of the embodiments of the invention will be apparent to a person skilled in the art. It is therefore contemplated that the invention shall also cover any such modifications, variations and equivalents.

Claims

1. A method of providing a fraud indication, the method comprising: receiving, by a computer processor associated with a fraud detection server, first transaction information associated with a first transaction;determining, by the computer processor, a first derivative locator based at least in part on the first transaction information, wherein the first derivative locator encodes at least a portion of the first transaction information;linking, by the computer processor, a first transaction record with the first derivative locator;accessing, from one or more databases associated with the fraud detection server, transaction records, wherein each transaction record is linked to at least one derivative locator of a plurality of derivative locators;based at least on a comparison of the first derivative locator with the plurality of derivative locators, determining, by the computer processor, that the plurality of derivative locators includes the first derivative locator;in response to the determination that the plurality of derivative locators includes the first derivative locator, accessing, from the one or more databases, electronic records corresponding to the first derivative locator, wherein the electronic records comprise a reputation score that is generated using aggregated device information or aggregated user information, and wherein the reputation score indicates a likelihood that the first derivative locator is associated with a fraudulent transaction; andtransmitting, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, the first transaction record and the reputation score.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each derivative locator encodes at least a portion of transaction information associated with at least one of the transaction records.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the reputation score further indicates a likelihood that the first derivative locator is associated with at least one of a fraudulent device or a fraudulent user.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first derivative locator is determined based on: a credit card number used in the first transaction, a transaction amount from the first transaction, or both.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: based at least in part on a comparison of the reputation score to a threshold score, generating and transmitting, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, instructions configured to cancel the first transaction.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: based at least in part on a comparison of the reputation score to a threshold score, generating and transmitting, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, instructions configured to perform a verification test.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first transaction is an online transaction.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregated device information or aggregated user information is aggregated from one or more financial institutions.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing at least some of the first transaction information to a repository; andupdating the reputation score based on at least some of the first transaction information.

10. A system for providing a fraud indication, the system comprising: a fraud detection server configured to establish a connection with a plurality of network servers over a network, the plurality of network servers comprising a transaction processing computing server and a remote financial server;a data store configured to store computer-executable instructions; anda processor in communication with the data store, the processor, when executing the computer-executable instructions, configured to: receive, by a computer processor associated with a fraud detection server, first transaction information associated with a first transaction;determine, by the computer processor, a first derivative locator based at least in part on the first transaction information, wherein the first derivative locator encodes at least a portion of the first transaction information;link, by the computer processor, a first transaction record with the first derivative locator;access, from one or more databases associated with the fraud detection server, transaction records, wherein each transaction record is linked to at least one derivative locator of a plurality of derivative locators;based at least on a comparison of the first derivative locator with the plurality of derivative locators, determine, by the computer processor, that the plurality of derivative locators includes the first derivative locator;in response to the determination that the plurality of derivative locators includes the first derivative locator, accessing, from the one or more databases, electronic records corresponding to the first derivative locator, wherein the electronic records comprise a reputation score that is generated using aggregated device information or aggregated user information, and wherein the reputation score indicates a likelihood that the first derivative locator is associated with a fraudulent transaction; andtransmit, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, the first transaction record and the reputation score.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the first derivative locator is determined based on: a credit card number used in the first transaction, a transaction amount from the first transaction, or both.

12. The system of claim 10, wherein the aggregated device information or aggregated user information is aggregated from one or more financial institutions.

13. The system of claim 10, wherein the computer processor is further configured to: based at least in part on a comparison of the reputation score to a threshold score, rate and transmit, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, instructions configured to cancel the first transaction.

14. The system of claim 10, wherein the computer processor is further configured to: provide at least some of the first transaction information to a repository; andupdate the reputation score based on at least some of the first transaction information.

15. A non-transitory computer storage having stored thereon a computer program, the computer program comprising executable instructions that instruct a computer processor of a fraud detection server to at least: receive, by a computer processor associated with a fraud detection server, first transaction information associated with a first transaction;determine, by the computer processor, a first derivative locator based at least in part on the first transaction information, wherein the first derivative locator encodes at least a portion of the first transaction information;link, by the computer processor, a first transaction record with the first derivative locator;access, from one or more databases associated with the fraud detection server, transaction records, wherein each transaction record is linked to at least one derivative locator of a plurality of derivative locators;based at least on a comparison of the first derivative locator with the plurality of derivative locators, determine, by the computer processor, that the plurality of derivative locators includes the first derivative locator;in response to the determination that the plurality of derivative locators includes the first derivative locator, accessing, from the one or more databases, electronic records corresponding to the first derivative locator, wherein the electronic records comprise a reputation score that is generated using aggregated device information or aggregated user information, and wherein the reputation score indicates a likelihood that the first derivative locator is associated with a fraudulent transaction; andtransmit, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, the first transaction record and the reputation score.

16. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 15, wherein the first derivative locator is determined based on: a credit card number used in the first transaction, a transaction amount from the first transaction, or both.

17. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 15, wherein the aggregated device information or aggregated user information is aggregated from one or more financial institutions.

18. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 15, wherein the computer processor is further configured to: based at least in part on a comparison of the reputation score to a threshold score, rate and transmit, by the computer processor and to a remote financial server, instructions configured to cancel the first transaction.

19. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 15, wherein the computer processor is further configured to: provide at least some of the first transaction information to a repository; andupdate the reputation score based on at least some of the first transaction information.

20. The non-transitory computer storage of claim 15, wherein the first transaction is an online transaction.