The present disclosure relates to methods and systems for extracting particles from ferrofluids.
WO2011/071912 and WO2012/057878 presents systems and methods for separating microparticles or cells contained in a ferrofluid medium using magnetic forces. The magnitude of these forces depend, in part, on the volume of the non-magnetic particles (e.g., moieties) for separation/targeting. Moreover, a larger cell or microparticle displaces a larger ferrofluid volume, and experiences larger forces.
Mechanical exclusion, via well-known filtration is, by its very nature, prone to clogging, and also subsequent increases in pressure drop across the filter as the filter becomes more and more clogged. Such filtration means rely on physically stopping a large enough target particle across a smaller opening on a surface.
Embodiments of this disclosure are a further application and development of previous series of disclosures, including, for example PCT publication no. WO2011/071912 and WO2012/057878, the noted disclosures of which are all herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
In some embodiments, methods for extracting particles contained in a ferrofluid medium are provided. Such methods may comprise suspending particles of different sizes in a ferrofluid medium to form a mix and containing the mix in a reservoir (e.g., cylindrical), and applying a first magnetic field to at least a portion of the reservoir. The first magnetic field is configured to indirectly exert a force on at least a portion of the particles of at least one predetermined size and/or shape, and direct the portion of particles in a desired direction.
Such method embodiments may additionally include one or more (or all, as applicable) of the following features (thereby establishing yet other embodiments):
In some embodiment of the disclosure, systems for extracting particles contained in a biocompatible ferrofluid medium are provided. Such systems may comprise a reservoir (e.g., cylindrical) configured to contain a ferrofluid medium containing particles of different sizes to form a mix, a first magnetic field source configured to indirectly exert a force on the particles to direct at least a portion of the particles of at least one size and/or shape in a desired direction, and an extraction opening arranged on a portion of the reservoir and/or in communication with the reservoir, the extraction opening configured to receive particles of at least one size and/or shape (may be predetermined size and/or shape) from the reservoir as a result of the exerted force.
Such system embodiments, may include one or more (or all, as applicable) of the following additional features (thereby establishing yet other embodiments):
The above-noted embodiments, as well as other embodiments, will become even more evident with reference to the following detailed description and associated drawing, a brief description of which is provided below.
As shown in
It is possible to create a magnetic field pattern around a sample reservoir or vial carrying microparticles or cells suspended within a biocompatible ferrofluid in order to push those moieties either toward or away from an extraction hole. This approach and the device that achieves this manipulation could be used in the context of either speeding or delaying the delivery of the target moieties from the volume of the reservoir into the fluidic cartridge downstream. The magnitude of this magnetic force would depend in part on the intensity of the magnetic field sources, as well as their relative geometry with respect to that of the reservoir. The magnetic force also depends on the ferrofluid susceptibility and the volume of the microparticles/cells. Hence, the pushing force, in conjunction with the flow rate out of the reservoir/vial into the extraction hole, could be engineered such that moieties larger than a selectable threshold volume could be continuously and dynamically repelled away the vial's outlet under steady state conditions. In this fashion, moieties larger than the selectable threshold volume could be excluded from the fluidic network downstream.
What is described here is an “active pre-filter” that works on dynamic magnetic exclusion principles in steady-state flow and magnetic excitation conditions. Most other size-based filtration methods rely on mechanical obstacles (such as pore sizes of a given diameter in filter paper or micro fabricated devices) and work on static mechanical exclusion principles.
The active pre-filter described here avoids the shortcomings of mechanical filters by achieving size-based separation and exclusion within the 3D volume of the vial/reservoir, instead of the 2D surface of a mechanic filter (
Even if the filtered moieties tend to cluster within the ferrofluid, their increased overall hydrodynamic diameter will result in substantially larger repulsion forces on them. With flow drag roughly proportional to the hydrodynamic diameter (˜d) and magnetic forces proportional to the hydrodynamic volume (˜d3), the larger cluster will be pushed further away from the outlet. Hence, this active pre-filter features a negative feedback mechanism that naturally prevents potential clogging issues (
It may be necessary to intentionally and periodically stir up the contents of the vial so as to break up clusters of large microparticles or cells. This will ensure that anything smaller than the selection threshold is not impeded by or somehow stuck within the clusters. This effect might be easily achieved by modulating the intensity of the externally applied magnetic field and allowing the flow to break the dynamic clusters apart (
In the simplest realization of the active pre-filter, a vial/reservoir with cylindrical symmetry sits on top of a tunable source of magnetic fields, preferably encompassing similar symmetry in its geometry. The magnetic field and its gradient are designed to push the target moieties suspended in a biocompatible ferrofluid up and towards the center of the vial, into the region of strongest flow (away from the vial's interior surfaces). The biocompatible ferrofluid is pulled into an extraction hole at the center bottom of the vial via externally imposed flow conditions (e.g., a pump or pressure device). The intensity of the magnetic field and its gradient are engineered so as to push moieties larger than a selectable size up and away from the vial's outlet at the bottom faster than the maximum flow rate near the vicinity of the outlet. In certain instances, a recirculation region within toroidal symmetry is formed around the outlet, capturing and circulating the filtered moieties. In other geometries, the filtered moieties hover dynamically a certain distance over the outlet. In such cases, as the filtration progresses, the filtered moieties are intentionally allowed to cluster and pushed further up.
In some embodiments, a non-magnetic membrane 47 configured with pore sizes larger than microparticles 42 within the reservoir 40 containing the ferrofluid mix 41 of ferrofluid and target particles is provided. Such membranes function to capture target particles using magnetic fields. For example, in the absence of externally applied magnetic fields, micro/target particles/cells may flow through the membrane's pores. However, upon applying a magnetic fields, the non-magnetic membrane 47 may be configured to direct debris, particulate contaminants and microparticles/cells 42, larger than a size threshold value (for example), away from the pores of the membrane and into the space between the pores. Particles 42 smaller than the threshold, in some embodiments, tend to follow flow streamlines and pass through the non-magnetic membrane 47.
The non-magnetic membrane, in one embodiment, is made out of a plastic sheet. In addition, in some embodiments, the pores may be configured as any size (on a scale relative to the teachings herein, e.g., pore sizes of 1-200 μm, 5-50 μm, 10-100 μm, 20-30 μm), and any shape, including, for example, round, circular, polygonal, rectangular/slit, square, and/or elliptical. In some embodiments, the shape of the pores is configured to aid in the intended functionality of capturing particles using magnetic forces and not by pore size (i.e., pore size relative to target particle size), such that the overall pore size, in some embodiments, is larger than the target particle size.
A plurality of pores, according to some embodiments, may be arranged in predetermined patterns (i.e., not random), and may be configured in such a manner to aid in the capture functionality of the membrane feature. Thus, groups of pores on the same or different size, shape, etc., may be arranged in repeated groups or matrix. Such pores may be manufactured into a sheet of material, by, for example, laser etching.
In some embodiments, the porous membrane may be made from a thin foil of a magnetic material configured with a magnetic susceptibility which is greater than that of the ferrofluid at the magnetic excitation frequencies used (for example). For instance, such magnetic membranes may be machined out of a thin foil of nickel via, for example, lithographic etching or laser machining. Accordingly, upon the application of a magnetic field (e.g., external magnetic field), the magnetic field lines traversing the thickness of the magnetic membrane tend to remain within the membrane material. This effect, according to some embodiments, may result in weaker field amplitudes within the pores compared to just outside them, which thereby creates a magnetic field gradient that can push the non-magnetic particles towards the pores. In some embodiments, if magnetic beads are added to the sample mixture, they may be attracted towards the surface of the magnetic membrane between the pores. In this same fashion, functionalized magnetic beads may be used to rapidly pull down, isolate and purify target moieties in biocompatible ferrofluids.
The porous membrane is not absolutely necessary for the active filter to function, but by creating strong and localized field gradients, it allows for a much more robust and easily tunable size-based separation.
When the fields are lowered in magnitude or turned off completely, the retained particles/cells can be selectively released back into the flow stream. For instance, in an assay that is conducted with a mixture of whole blood and blood-compatible ferrofluid, platelets, red blood cells and white blood cells may be sequentially retained and selectively entered into the assay channels by reducing the magnetic field amplitude appropriately for each cell size. Hence, with the use of the active pre-filter, labor- and time-intensive cell separation techniques (such as centrifugation) may be rendered redundant, resulting in much quicker and simpler assay protocols. The field magnitudes may be sequentially controlled and timed by a microprocessor as part of an automated assay.
In yet another embodiment, multiple membranes may be stacked serially along the fluidic pathway, and may be exposed to the same magnetic field sources (for example). Each membrane may be positioned parallel to others in the stack and, in some embodiments, at least partially orthogonal to the flow direction. In some embodiments, a minimum spacing between each membrane is chosen to correspond to at least their thickness, so that field line density has space to return to normal between each membrane (i.e., in some embodiments, this is provided to avoid one membrane from interfering with the filtering ability of its neighbor). In some embodiments, using stacked, non-magnetic membranes with progressively smaller pore sizes, a complex mixture with various cell/particle sizes (such as whole blood) may be fractionated very rapidly based on size.
In some embodiments, the porous membrane may be used to rapidly immobilize and hold down functionalized beads over its surface. These beads would carry at least one kind of receptor molecule, antibody, DNA fragment and other ligand on their outer surface. As the beads are held on the membrane with magnetic fields, a mixture of target and non-target moieties may be flown through the active filter and rapidly captured on the “carpet” of beads sitting over the porous membrane. The target moieties may be small molecules, proteins, complementary DNA fragments, viruses, bacteria or even larger cells. Once the target moieties have been captured on the beads and isolated from the initial mixture, they could be either tagged and quantified directly on the porous membrane, or be released into the assay chamber for further processing and quantification. With this approach, what is normally a lengthy and labor-intensive sample preparation, incubation and isolation process can be reduced to an automatic and rapid step within a simple instrument.
In some embodiments, actual bacteria and cells are held on the porous membrane surface with magnetic fields, and can be exposed to molecular tags, candidate drug molecules, antibodies or other proteins, with the express purpose of dramatically accelerating the incubation processes associated with binding ligands to cellular surface biomarkers.
The porous membrane may also be functionalized with ligands that capture the pathogens or cells held on its surface. This approach is especially useful if it is desired to have target pathogens or cells remain on the membrane surface while other moieties present in the initial sample mixture are washed away when the magnetic fields are turned down (such as in sample purification or immune-sorbent assays). As such, the active filter not only solves the mass transport limitations associated with incubation steps in molecular or cellular assays, it also avoids the labor-intensive washing steps that typically follow binding/capture reactions.
Any and all references to publications or other documents, including but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, webpages, books, etc., presented in the present application, are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Example embodiments of the devices, systems and methods have been described herein. As noted elsewhere, these embodiments have been described for illustrative purposes only and are not limiting. Other embodiments are possible and are covered by the disclosure, which will be apparent from the teachings contained herein. Thus, the breadth and scope of the disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described embodiments but should be defined only in accordance with claims supported by the present disclosure and their equivalents. Moreover, embodiments of the subject disclosure may include methods, systems and devices which may further include any and all elements from any other disclosed methods, systems, and devices, including any and all elements corresponding to target particle separation, focusing/concentration. In other words, elements from one or another disclosed embodiments may be interchangeable with elements from other disclosed embodiments. In addition, one or more features/elements of disclosed embodiments may be removed and still result in patentable subject matter (and thus, resulting in yet more embodiments of the subject disclosure). Correspondingly, some embodiments of the present disclosure may be patentably distinct from one and/or another reference by specifically lacking one or more elements/features. In other words, claims to certain embodiments may contain negative limitation to specifically exclude one or more elements/features resulting in embodiments which are patentably distinct from the prior art which include such features/elements.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/777,505, filed Sep. 15, 2015, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Active Particle Separation,” which is a national stage entry application of and claims priority to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/029336, filed Mar. 14, 2014, and entitled “Systems and Methods for Active Particle Separation,” which claims benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/794,885, filed Mar. 15, 2013, and entitled, “PCB-Based Magnetic Excitation Approach.” The present application incorporates herein by reference the disclosures of each of the above-referenced applications in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3764540 | Khalafalla et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3898156 | Kaiser | Aug 1975 | A |
4448534 | Wertz et al. | May 1984 | A |
4935147 | Ullman et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5076950 | Ullman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5194133 | Clark et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5439586 | Richards et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5932100 | Yager et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5998224 | Rohr et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6038104 | Sato et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6432630 | Blankenstein | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6596143 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610186 | Mayer et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620627 | Liberti et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6663757 | Fuhr et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7960311 | Carlson | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8364409 | Rieder et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8961878 | Koser | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961898 | Nisisako et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9352317 | Koser | May 2016 | B2 |
9415398 | Yellen et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9726592 | Koser | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9999855 | Koser | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10302634 | Koser | May 2019 | B2 |
10632463 | Koser | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10782223 | Koser | Sep 2020 | B2 |
11204350 | Koser | Dec 2021 | B2 |
20020003001 | Weigl et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016751 | Sekiya | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049782 | Herzenberg et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059132 | Quay et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020106314 | Pelrine et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020144934 | Exner | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030159999 | Oakey et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030203507 | Liberti et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030235504 | Lemoff et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040018611 | Ward et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040067167 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096977 | Rakestraw et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050012579 | Underwood et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050233472 | Kao et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237528 | Oldham et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244932 | Harding | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266433 | Kapur et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280811 | Sandell | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011305 | Sandell et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011552 | Utsunomiya | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013984 | Sandell et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024690 | Kao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060024831 | Kao et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029948 | Lim et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060188399 | Gu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060166357 | Takayama et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060286549 | Sohn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014694 | Beard et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070015289 | Kao et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070125971 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134809 | Cho et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070196820 | Kapur et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070215553 | Yellen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070224084 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080000892 | Hirano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006202 | Hirano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035541 | Franzreb et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038725 | Luo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080148821 | Donsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080210560 | Barringer | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255006 | Wang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080302732 | Soh et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090035838 | Quake et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090050569 | Jung et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090078614 | Varghese et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090148933 | Battrell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165876 | Atkin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175797 | Warren et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090220932 | Ingber et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090227044 | Dosev et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090251136 | Prins et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090325276 | Battrell et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100068824 | Kimura | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075340 | Javanmard et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100093052 | Chalmers et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100120077 | Daridon | May 2010 | A1 |
20110003392 | Stayton et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110020459 | Achrol et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110059468 | Earhart et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065209 | Heil et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110114490 | Pamula et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110124116 | Wohlstadter et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110212440 | Viovy et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110262893 | Dryga et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110312518 | Davis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120080360 | Stone et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120108470 | Oh et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120178645 | Foekens et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190589 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120237997 | Koser | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130189794 | Emeric et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130140241 | Yellen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130313113 | Koser | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140044600 | McAlister | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140214583 | Assuncao et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140283945 | Jones et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150041396 | Kelly et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160016171 | Goel | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160188399 | Benedict | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160263574 | Smith et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160296944 | Koser | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296945 | Koser | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160299052 | Koser | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160299126 | Koser | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160299132 | Koser | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170122851 | Thatcher et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170259265 | Diller et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170285060 | Koser | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170297028 | Jones et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180029033 | Koser | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180029035 | Koser | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180128671 | Paur et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180128729 | Koser | May 2018 | A1 |
20180361397 | Koser | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190120822 | Koser | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190339262 | Koser | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200306758 | Dhlakama | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200353466 | Koser | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101087655 | Dec 2007 | CN |
201125246 | Oct 2008 | CN |
WO 1991001381 | Feb 1991 | WO |
WO 2006004558 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006067715 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2008042003 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2010117458 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2012142664 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2011071812 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011071912 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2011139233 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2012057878 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2013155525 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO 2014044810 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014144340 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014144782 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014145765 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014065317 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2017004595 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kose, AR et al. Ferrofluid mediated nanocytometry. 2012. Lab on a Chip. 12: 190-196. Published on Nov. 11, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,504, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,504, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,505, 24 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,505, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,512, 18 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,512, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/623,134, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/623,134, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,511, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 31, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,511, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 16, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,511, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,511, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,507, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/777,507, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/827,073, 25 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,466, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/740,288, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/882,013, 5 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/882,013, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 25, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/882,013, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 31, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/514,331, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/514,331, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,492, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,890, 8 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,890, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 18, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/039516, 7 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 dated Nov. 18, 2016 for Australian Application No. 2015268583, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 13, 2017 for European Application No. 11836778.8, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 8, 2011 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/059270, 10 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 11, 2017 for European Application No. 10836542.0, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 5, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/028705, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 4, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029336, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 11, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/030584, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 5, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029376, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 20, 2014 for International Application No. PCT/US2014/030629, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/039394, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 13, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/040861, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2017 for International Application No. PCT/US2017/043985, 9 pages. |
Applegate et al., “Optical trapping, manipulation, and sorting of cells and colloids in microfluidic systems with diode laser bars,” Optical Express 12:4390-4398 (2004). |
Ashkin et al., “Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams,” Nature 330:769-771 (1987). |
Ashkin et al., “Optical trapping and manipulation of virsuses and bacteria,” Science 235:1517-1520 (1987). |
Bautista et al., “Comparative study of ferrofluids based on dextran-coated iron oxide and metal nanoparticles for contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging,” Nanotechnology 15:S154-S159 (2004). |
Beyor et al., “Immunomagnetic bead-based cell concentration microdevice for dilute pathogen detection,” Biomed Microdevices 10:909-917 (2008). |
Blattner et al., “The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12,” Science 277:1453-1474 (1997). |
Cabrera et al., “Continuous concentration of bacteria in a microfluidic flow cell using electrokinetic techniques,” Electrophoresis 22:355-362 (2001). |
Castagiuolo et al., “Engineered E. coli delivers therapeutic genes to the colonic mucosa,” Gene Therapy 12:1070-1078 (2005). |
Cheong et al., “Gold nanoparticles for one step DNA extraction and real-time PCR of pathogens in a single chamber,” Lab Chip 8:810-813 (2008). |
Chiou et al., “Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images,” Nature 436:370-372 (2005). |
Davis et al., “Deterministic hydrodynamics: Taking blood apart,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14779-14784 (2006). |
Dittrich et al., “Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery,” Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 5:210-218 (2006). |
Dufresne et al., “Optical tweezer arrays and optical substrates created with diffractive optics,” Rev Sci Instrum 69:1974-1977 (1998). |
Dumesny et al., “Synthesis, expression and biological activity of the prohormone for gastrin releasing peptide,” Endocrinology 147(1):502-509 (2006). |
Fischer et al., Ferro-microfluidic device for pathogen detection, IEEE Int Conf on Nano/Micro Eng and Molecular System China, 907-910 (2008). |
Gijs, “Magnetic bead handling on-chip: new opportunities for analytical applications,” Microfluidics Nanofluidics 1:22-40 (2004). |
Goldman et al., “Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall—I motion through a quiescent fluid,” Chem Eng Sci 22:637-651 (1967). |
Green, “The Sigma-Aldrich Handbook of Stains, Dyes & Indicators,” Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI, 721-722 (1990). |
Han et al., Kynurenine aminotransferase and glutamine transaminase K of Escherichia coli: Identity with aspartate aminotransferase, Biochemical Journal 360(3):617-623 (2001). |
Horan et al., “Stable cell membrane labeling,” Nature 340:167-168 (1989). |
Hughes, “Strategies for dielectrophoretic separation in laboratory-on-a-chip systems,” Electrophoresis 23:2569-2582 (2002). |
Ise, “When, why, and how does like like like?—Electrostatic attraction between similarly charged species,” Proc Jpn Acad B Phys Biol Sci 83:192-198 (2007). |
Jayashree et al., “Identification and Characterization of Bile Salt Hydrolase Genese from the Genome of Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC 8711,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 174(2):855-866 (2014). |
Kamei et al., “Microfluidic Genetic Analysis with an Integrated a-Si:H Detector,” Biomed Microdevices 7:147-152 (2005). |
Kashevsky, “Nonmagnetic particles in magnetic fluid: Reversal dynamics under rotating field,” Phys Fluids 9:1811-1818 (1997). |
Kim et al., “Synthesis of ferroflid with magnetic nanoparticles by sonochemical method for MRI contrast agent,” J Magn Magn Mater 289:328-330 (2005). |
Kim et al., “Cloning and characterization of the bile salt hydrolase genes (bsh) from Bifidobacterium bifidum strains,” Applied and Environmental Biology 70(9):5603-5612 (2004). |
Kose et al., “Towards Ferro-microfluidics for Effective and Rapid Cellular Manipulation and Sorting,” Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Nano/Microengineered and Molecular Systems, Jan. 6-9, 2008, pp. 903-906. |
Kose et al., “Label-free cellular manipulation and sorting via biocompatible ferrofluids,” Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA, 106(51):21478-21483 (2009). |
Kose et al., “Supporting information to Label-free cellular manipulation and sorting via biocompatible microfluids,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA; retrieved from the Internet: http://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2009/12/07/0912138106.DCSupplemental/Appendix.PDF.pdf (2009). |
Kremser et al., “Capillary electrophoresis of biological particles: Viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotic cells,” Electrophoresis 25:2282-2291 (2004). |
Kumar et al., “Molecular cloning, characterization and heterologous expression of bile salt hydrolase (bsh) from Lactobacillus fermentum NCD0394,” Molecular Biology Reports 40(8):5057-5066 (2013). |
Lee et al., “Microelectromagnets for the control of magnetic nanoparticles,” Appl Phys Lett 79:3308-3310 (2001). |
Lekka et al., “Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studies by scanning force microscopy,” Eur Biophys J 28:312-316 (1999). |
Liu et al., “Evidence for Localized Cell Heating Induced by Infrared Optical Tweezers,” Biophys J 68:2137-2144 (1995). |
Maiorov, “Experimental Study of the Permeability of a ferrofluid in an alternating magnetic field,” Magneetohydrodynamics 15:135-139 (1979). |
Mao et al., “Towards ferrofluidics for μ-TAS and lab on-a-chip applications,” Nanotechnology 17:34-47 (2006). |
Massart, “Preparation of Aqueous Magnetic Liquids in Alkaline and Acid Media,” IEEE Trans Magn 17:1247-1248 (1981). |
Menachery et al., Controlling cell destruction using dielectrophoretic forces, NanoBiotechnology 152:145-149 (2005). |
Muller et al., “The Potential of Dielectrophoresis for Single-Cell Experiments,” IEEE Eng Biol Med Mag 22:51-61 (2003). |
Pethig et al., “Applications of dielectrophoresis in biotechnology,” Trends Biotechnol 15:426-432 (1997). |
Romasi et al., “Development of Indole-3-Acetic Acid-Producing Escherichia coli by Functional Expression of IpdC, AspC, and Iad1,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 23(12):1726-1736 (2013). |
Sarsero et al., “A new family of integral membrane proteins involved in transport of aromatic amino acids in Escherichia-Coli,” Journal of Bacteriology 173(10):3231-3234 (1991). |
Sebastian et al., “Formation of multilayer aggregates of mammalian cells by dielectrophoresis,” J Micromech Microeng 16:1769-1777 (2006). |
Scherer et al., Ferrofluids: Properties and Applications, Brazilian J Phys 45:718-727 (2005). |
Steidler et al., “Genetically engineered Probiotics,” Baillier's Best Practice and Research. Clinical Gastroenterology 17(5): 861-876 (2003). |
Tung et al., “Magnetic properties of ultrafine cobalt ferrite particles,” J Appl Phys 93:7486-7488 (2003). |
Wang et al., “Expression of rat pro cholecystokinin (CCK) in bacteria and in insect cells infected with recombinant Baculovirus,” Peptides 18(9):1295-1299 (1997). |
Whelan et al., “A Transgenic Probiotic Secreting a Parasite Immunomodulator for Site-Directed Treatment of Gut Inflammation,” Molecular Therapy 22(10):1730-1740 (2014). |
Yan et al., “Near-field-magnetic-tweezer manipulation of single DNA molecules,” Phys Rev E 70:011905 (2004). |
Yellen et al., “Arranging matter by magnetic nanoparticle assemblers,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8860-8864 (2005). |
Zahn et al., “Ferrohydrodynamic pumping in spatially uniform sinusoidally time-varying magnetic fields,” J of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 149:165-173 (1995). |
Zhang et al., “A microfluidic system with surface modified piezoelectric sensor for trapping and detection of cancer cells,” Biosens Bioelectron 26(2):935-939 (2010). |
Zhang et al., “Low temperature and glucose enhanced T7 RNA polymerase-based plasmid stability for increasing expression of glucagon-like peptide-2 in Escherichia coli,” Protein Expression and Purification 29(1):132-139 (2003). |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/113,793, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 16, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/623,134, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/982,926, 19 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,466, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/739,466, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/708,032, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/660,616, 17 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/660,616, 14 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/660,616, 22 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/660,606, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/670,264, 11 pages. |
First Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2021 for Chinese Application No. 201780060346.2, with English language translation, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 22, 2018 for International Application No. PCT/US2017/065883, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 14, 2021 for European Application No. 17934894.1, 6 pages. |
Kang et al., “Monitoring of anticancer effect of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil on HepG2 cells by quartz crystal microbalance and micro CCD camera,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 26:1576-1581 (2010). |
Primiceri et al., “Cell chips as new tools for cell biology—results, perspectives and opportunities,” Lab Chip 13:3789-3802 (2013). |
Asmatulu, R. et al., “A Ferrofluid Guided System for the Rapid Separation of the Non-Magnetic Particles in a Microfluidic Device,” Journal of Neuroscience and Nanotechnology, 10:1-5 (2010). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190118190 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61794885 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14777505 | US | |
Child | 16013793 | US |