The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for acoustic detection and, more particularly, to systems and methods for canceling noise in acoustic detection systems.
A number of conventional systems detect, classify, and track air and ground bodies or targets. The sensing elements that permit these systems to perform these functions typically include arrays of microphones whose outputs are processed to reject coherent interfering acoustic noise sources (such as nearby machinery). Other sources of system noise include general acoustic background noise (e.g., leaf rustling) and wind noise. Both of these sources are uncorrelated between microphones. They can, however, be of sufficient magnitude to significantly impact system performance.
While uncorrelated noise is addressed by spatial array processing, there are limits to signal-to-noise improvements that can be achieved, usually on the order of 10*log N, where N is the number of microphones. Since ambient acoustic noise is scenario dependent, it can only be minimized by finding the quietest array location. At low wind speeds, system performance will be limited by ambient acoustic noise. However, at some wind speed, wind noise will become the dominant noise source—for typical scenarios at approximately 5 mph at low frequencies. The primary source of wind noise is the fluctuating, non-acoustic pressure due to the turbulent boundary layer induced by the presence of the sensor in the wind flow field. The impact of an increase in wind noise is a reduction in all aspects of system performance: detection range, probability of correct classification, and bearing estimation. For example, detection range can be reduced by a factor of two for each 3–6 dB increase in wind noise (depending on acoustic propagation conditions).
Therefore, there exists a need for systems and methods that can cancel wind noise so as to improve the performance of acoustic detection systems such as, for example, acoustic detection systems employed in vehicle mounted systems for which the effective wind speed includes the relative velocity of the vehicle when the vehicle is in motion.
Systems and methods consistent with the present invention address this and other needs by providing a multi-sensor windscreen assembly, and associated wind noise cancellation circuitry, to enable the detection of a desired acoustic signal while reducing wind noise. Multiple reference sensors, consistent with the present invention, may be distributed across a surface of a three dimensional body, such as a sphere, cylinder, or cone and may produce a response signal that corresponds to a net pressure acting on the three dimensional body. A primary sensor may further be located within the three dimensional body to sense acoustic pressure signals and non-acoustic pressure disturbances (e.g., wind noise). A finite impulse response (FIR) filter may adaptively filter the response signal from the multiple reference sensors to produce a filtered response. The filtered response may, in turn, be subtracted from a signal from the primary sensor to produce a signal that contains reduced non-acoustic disturbances. The filter may employ a least-means-square (LMS) algorithm for adjusting coefficients of the FIR filter to reduce the non-acoustic pressure disturbances. Systems and methods consistent with the present invention, thus, using an adaptive filtering algorithm, cancel wind noise from an acoustic signal so as to improve the performance of acoustic detection systems.
In accordance with the purpose of the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, a method for reducing non-acoustic noise includes measuring pressure at a primary sensor to produce a primary pressure signal; measuring pressure at least one secondary sensor to produce a secondary pressure signal; filtering the secondary pressure signal to produce a filtered pressure signal; and subtracting the filtered pressure signal from the primary pressure signal to reduce non-acoustic noise in the primary pressure signal.
In another implementation consistent with the present invention, a method of measuring fluid pressure includes measuring fluid pressure inside a windscreen to produce a measurement signal; inferring a net fluid pressure acting on the windscreen, the net fluid pressure comprising acoustic and non-acoustic pressure; estimating a component of the non-acoustic pressure that is correlated with the net fluid pressure; and eliminating the estimated component of non-acoustic pressure from the measurement signal.
In yet another implementation consistent with the present invention, a method for canceling disturbances from a sensor signal includes sensing disturbances at first and second sensors, the first sensor producing a first signal and the second sensor producing a second signal; adaptively filtering the first signal to produce a filtered signal; and subtracting the filtered signal from the second signal to cancel the disturbances from the second signal.
In a further implementation consistent with the present invention, a windscreen includes a three dimensional body comprising at least one surface; a first sensor located within the three dimensional body; and a plurality of second sensors distributed on the at least one surface of the body, the sensors configured to sense forces acting upon the body.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, explain the invention. In the drawings,
The following detailed description of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings may identify the same or similar elements. Also, the following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.
Systems and methods, consistent with the present invention, provide mechanisms that adaptively reduce noise in multiple signals received from a multi-sensor device. Multiple reference sensors, consistent with the present invention, may be distributed across a surface of a three dimensional body, such as a sphere, cylinder, or cone. A primary sensor may be located within the three dimensional body. Fluid pressures acting on the reference sensors may be combined to infer a net pressure acting on the three dimensional body, with the net pressure being correlated with the non-acoustic pressure acting over the entire three dimensional body. The net pressure acting on the three-dimensional windscreen is the source of the non-acoustic pressure acting on the primary sensor at a reduced level inside of the windscreen. The reference sensors may measure the acoustic signal, together with the non-acoustic wind pressure, and the reference sensor measurements may be passed through noise cancellation circuitry that estimates a component of the wind noise that is correlated with the primary sensor output. This correlated component may be subtracted from the primary sensor output to provide a reduced noise sensor output. The noise cancellation circuitry may include a finite impulse response (FIR) filter whose parameters are adaptively adjusted using a least-means-square (LMS) algorithm.
As shown in
Each of the multiple reference sensors 115 may include any type of conventional transducer for measuring force or pressure. A piezoelectric transducer (e.g., a microphone) is one example of such a conventional transducer. In some embodiments of the invention, each of the multiple reference sensors 115 may measure acoustic and non-acoustic air pressure.
Adaptive finite impulse response (FIR) filter 415 may include a conventional digital FIR filter, and may filter the net reference sensor response s(k) received from reference sensors 115 or 315 to produce a filtered response y(k). The filtered response y(k) may be subtracted from the by primary sensor response t(k), at summation unit 425, to produce a residual primary sensor response e(k). The residual primary sensor response e(k) represents the noise reduced output of system 400. This noise-reduced output may be used in a conventional acoustic detection system (not shown) for detecting, classifying, and tracking objects or targets.
The net reference sensor response s(k) and the residual primary sensor response e(k) may be input to a conventional least-means-square (LMS) adaptive algorithm 430 for adaptively updating filter coefficients of filter 415. The adaptive nature of filter 415 accommodates changing conditions, such as, for example, changing wind speed, temperature, or barometric pressure. The LMS algorithm for updating the filter coefficient vector W may be given by:
W(k+1)=W(k)+2*mu*e(k)*S(k) Eqn. (1)
where W(k) is a vector of filter coefficients at time step k;
mu is an adaptation constant;
e(k) is the residual primary sensor response at time step k; and
S(k) is a vector of net reference sensor input samples at time step k.
For an adaptive FIR filter 415 of N filter coefficients, the vector quantities are:
W(k+1)=[w0w1w2 . . . wN-1]T Eqn. (2)
S(k)=[s(k)s(k−1) . . . s(k−N+1)]T Eqn. (3)
The filter coefficients of vector W are adjusted by the LMS algorithm 430 so as to reduce the remaining non-acoustic noise in the primary sensor response t(k) that is correlated with the net reference sensor response s(k). To accomplish this, the LMS algorithm 430 correlates the residual primary sensor response e(k) with the net reference sensor response s(k). The correlated result is multiplied by the adaptation constant mu and then used to adjust the filter coefficients of adaptive filter 415. The LMS algorithm can be iterated, with the objective being convergence to filter coefficients that minimize the average power in the residual primary sensor response e(k). As one skilled in the art will recognize, the choice of mu determines the rate of convergence for the LMS algorithm, and also determines how well the algorithm tracks the optimum solution (i.e., minimum mean-square error) under steady-state conditions. One skilled in the art may choose an appropriate value of mu to achieve a desired tradeoff between a rate of convergence for the LMS algorithm and minimization of mean-square error.
y(k)=w0s(k)+w1s(k−1)+w2s(k−2)+ . . . +wNs(k−N+1) Eqn. (4)
e(k)=t(k)−y(k) Eqn. (6)
Summation unit 425 may, for example, be used to subtract the filtered response y(k) from the primary sensor response t(k) to generate the residual primary sensor response e(k). e(k), as described previously, represents the noise reduced output of system 400 and may be used in acoustic detection systems. The FIR filter 415 coefficients W may then be updated using LMS adaptive algorithm 430 [act 615]. For example, the LMS algorithm of Eqns. (1), (2) and (3) above may be used. At time step k=k+1, the process may return to act 605.
Systems and methods, consistent with the present invention, provide mechanisms that enable the detection of a desired acoustic signal incident at a multi-sensor windscreen assembly while reducing wind noise. The multi-sensor windscreen assembly may include multiple sensors distributed across a surface of a three dimensional windscreen, such as a sphere, cylinder, or cone, and may produce a response signal that corresponds to a net pressure acting on the three dimensional body. A primary sensor may further be located within the three dimensional body to sense acoustic pressure signals and non-acoustic pressure disturbances (e.g., wind noise). A finite impulse response (FIR) filter may adaptively filter the response signal from the multiple reference sensors to produce a filtered response. The filtered response may, in turn, be subtracted from a signal from the primary sensor to produce a signal that contains reduced non-acoustic disturbances. The filter may employ a least-means-square (LMS) algorithm for adjusting coefficients of the FIR filter to reduce non-acoustic pressure disturbances, thus, canceling wind noise from an acoustic signal so as to improve the performance of acoustic detection systems.
The foregoing description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. For example, while certain components of the invention have been described as implemented in hardware and others in software, other configurations may be possible. Also, while series of acts have been described with regard to
The instant application claims priority from provisional application No. 60/301,104, filed Jun. 26, 2001, and provisional application No. 60/306,624, filed Jul. 19, 2001, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. The instant application is related to co-pending application Ser. No. 10/170,865, entitled “Systems and Methods for Adaptive Wind Noise Rejection” and filed on Jun. 13, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1345717 | Thomas | Jul 1920 | A |
2200097 | Phelps | May 1940 | A |
2307792 | Hoover, Jr. | Jan 1943 | A |
2325424 | Rettinger | Jul 1943 | A |
2411117 | Scherbatskoy | Nov 1946 | A |
2417077 | Hoover, Jr. | Mar 1947 | A |
2520706 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1950 | A |
2645123 | Hundstad | Jul 1953 | A |
2772746 | Merten | Dec 1956 | A |
2776010 | Rike | Jan 1957 | A |
3067404 | Hildebrandt | Dec 1962 | A |
3154171 | Knutson et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3476208 | Sellman et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3479886 | Canfield | Nov 1969 | A |
3550720 | Ballard et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3572462 | Gray | Mar 1971 | A |
3953829 | Boyle | Apr 1976 | A |
3992951 | Erspamer et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4020919 | Broding | May 1977 | A |
4065648 | Cvetko et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4153815 | Chaplin et al. | May 1979 | A |
4159464 | Hall, Jr. | Jun 1979 | A |
4352254 | Peter et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4382201 | Trzaskos | May 1983 | A |
4570746 | Das et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4600077 | Drever | Jul 1986 | A |
4625827 | Bartlett | Dec 1986 | A |
4692912 | Mueller et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4750157 | Shei | Jun 1988 | A |
4764908 | Greer, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
4899845 | Bosco et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5010531 | McNeel | Apr 1991 | A |
5150104 | Thomas et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5231252 | Sansone | Jul 1993 | A |
5288955 | Staple et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5339287 | Bauer | Aug 1994 | A |
5339292 | Brown et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343744 | Ammann | Sep 1994 | A |
5398035 | Densmore et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5435178 | Edwards | Jul 1995 | A |
5444790 | Kogen | Aug 1995 | A |
5457995 | Staton et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469408 | Woo | Nov 1995 | A |
5473702 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477506 | Allen | Dec 1995 | A |
5684756 | Schmitz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5808243 | McCormick et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5917921 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929754 | Park et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5978317 | Whitener | Nov 1999 | A |
5996441 | Bateman | Dec 1999 | A |
6320968 | Linder | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6393913 | Dyck et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6502459 | Bonne et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507790 | Radomski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6538612 | King | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6604432 | Hamblen et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609069 | Gysling | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6805008 | Selvakumar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6854330 | Potter | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6935458 | Owens | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6963649 | Vaudrey et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978673 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
20020104379 | Ried et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030179103 | Kamata | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050171710 | Gysling et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060013425 | Kargus et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
359217122 | Dec 1984 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60306624 | Jul 2001 | US | |
60301104 | Jun 2001 | US |