The disclosure relates to networks and software for automotive commerce exchange.
Disclosed are systems and methods of an automotive commerce exchange that is an open platform and enables creative third-party developers, independent software vendors, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), and dealerships to consume Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and develop and market solutions to improve efficiency and innovation in the industry.
The past decade has been a period for growth for the automotive industry. The benefits of that growth, however, have been unevenly distributed. This growth has also masked headwinds that the industry must come to terms with soon. Some of these headwinds include complexity and cost pressure, diverging markets, digital demands, and shifting industry landscapes. Each of these items is discussed below:
Complexity and Cost Pressure
There will continue to be more platform sharing and more modular systems for automobiles. Regulatory pressures, however, will tighten, and prices in established markets will be flat.
Diverging Markets
OEMs will need to adapt to regional and segmented patterns of supply and demand with respect to production, supply chain, and product portfolios. Also, OEMs will need to be ready to embrace the growth opportunities in the Chinese after-sales-market.
Digital Demands
Consumers will continue to want more connectivity and will increasingly use digital sources to make their purchasing decisions.
Shifting Industry Landscapes
This relates to creating more value with alternative powertrain technologies that can emerge and satisfying consumer demand around safety and entertainment. OEMs will need to deal with the restructuring that must continue to occur in Europe to have capacity match demand and embrace the increasing competition that will occur in China.
Stakeholders in the automotive industry that will be impacted by these items include retailers, consumers, and OEMs, as discussed below:
Retailers
Retailers are facing, among other things, the following headwinds:
Consumers
Consumers are shifting toward digital tools when shopping for automobiles, are demanding a better end-to-end retail experience, and are driving omni-channel commerce and online-to-offline (O2O) experience.
OEMs
OEMs are investing more in Information Technology (IT) as they strive to control more of the consumer experience to compete with the threat that comes from direct distribution.
Other influences in today's automotive industry include:
Emerging ownership and transportation models,
Disruptive entrants on the horizon,
Independent point solutions are not unlocking value,
Sales associate productivity has not improved in 25 years, and
Sales processes are more complicated today for sales associates and customers and, as a result, still take too long.
With all these issues in mind, if a dealer from 1988 were dropped into a dealership in 2018 he or she may be both bewildered and amazed by the advancement of technology, manufacturing capability, safety, efficiency, and power that are available in today's automobiles. If the 1988 dealer were asked to actually sell a car, however, he or she would be in familiar territory. For example, scheduling and preparing a car for a test drive is just as labor-intensive and inefficient today as it was in 1988. The time it takes it to sell a car and the number of people to accomplish that sale and go through approval, desking, Finance and Insurance (F&I), titling, and delivery are almost identical to similar processes of 1988. Also, he or she would actually find that the sales value chain is just as fragmented and disconnected today as it was in 1988.
There are several reasons why current technological advancements have failed to improve automobile sales processes. First, current solutions are one off and one size does not fit all. Also, it is currently very difficult for software application developers to integrate with DMSs. Furthermore, mega products rarely satisfy needs with best in class experience across the board. On top of all this, contracting and partnership agreements are slow, manual, and ultimately result in a point-to-point solution with a poor developer experience. There is currently no one place that can be a single source of information for managing transactions between different services. While existing partner programs work and are a strong foundation, these programs enable a limited value exchange when it comes to revenue, data sharing, and business value because of these constraints. A Third-Party Access Program (3PA) that offers integration that is point-to-point and not generalized to go across the systems results in a manual enablement process without a marketplace to facilitate e-commerce and without a central orchestration engine.
The APIs 110 are not standardized, which is why the developers 102 would develop their own APIs 110 for each of the DMS providers 104. Developing different and separate APIs 110 for each of the DMS providers 104 incurs a high cost and consumes a significant amount of time of the developers 102. As a result, financial and time resources of the developers 102 are often tied up with these APIs 110 and little or no resources may be left for new innovation.
Systems and methods disclosed herein address these challenges and enable end-to-end automotive commerce. Systems and methods disclosed herein power an open platform that allows for easy integration of capabilities to increase sales, operational efficiency, and profitability for dealers. Embodiments of the disclosure enable end-end e-commerce for automotive industry via an open platform. Also, systems and methods disclosed herein provide standardized APIs to reduce the amount of resources developers invest in APIs, leaving more resources for innovation in other areas.
Embodiments of the disclosure include one or more of the following:
Standardized APIs to enable third-party developers to access DMS and other source of truth systems, in contrast with conventional APIs, which are not consistent or standardized and make developers' lives difficult and slow down the rate of innovation.
Best in class software modules to fulfill a given business workflow and enable consumers of the modules such as dealers, dealer group IT professionals, and end users to avail themselves of the flexibility afforded by these modules.
Flexibility to enable OEMs to innovate regardless of the software vendors being used by their dealerships.
Aggregated automotive APIs in one place to enable the community to innovate.
Aggregated automotive forums, blogs, or both in one place to enable the community to collaborate.
A marketplace that offers the capability to list, market, sell, and buy the solutions and enable seamless automated e-commerce.
Transaction aware smart orchestration to power up innovation and customer experience on the platform.
By facilitating the creation of an exchange that allows for standardized hosting of APIs and Software Development Kits (SDKs) that can be leveraged by various parties (e.g., developers, dealers, designated agents, OEMs, and industry verticals) through an automated brokering process. This enables a developer network that allows for easy creation of solutions leveraging these APIs through a modern developer experience, according to various embodiments disclosed herein.
Embodiments disclosed herein can be hosted and distributed in a marketplace. Because the exchange is the principal interface point for data, multiple value and revenue chains may be created for OEMs, dealer IT, and third-party Independent Software Venders (ISVs). Whereas in previous systems, point-to-point solutions that used custom contract negotiation and bespoke API enablement, now a turnkey, self-service process allows a developer or OEM to publish APIs and solutions once. As a result, these APIs and solutions can serve an unlimited number of customers.
Since the exchange is the intersection point for transactions and data interchange, true workflow across applications and services may be enabled. This paves the way for the future of automotive commerce by creating opportunities for the developers, dealer IT, and third-party ISVs to create powerful solutions that orchestrate activities via simple enablement and integration such as notifications, expert recommendation powered by machine learning, and targeting advertising and cross-selling based on geographic, psychographic, and other available consumer data.
As previously discussed, developers, dealers, designated agents, OEMs, and industry verticals that want to participate in automotive commerce space may be enabled to participate in automotive commerce using embodiments disclosed herein. These embodiments provide simple-to-use, scalable, and secure access to automotive commerce.
There has never previously been an easy way to combine and integrate a best-in-class solution a dealer needs without an often prohibitive amount of custom development and integration. Embodiments disclosed herein remove that barrier from dealers, allowing them to pick the solutions and services they want. Embodiments disclosed herein also make changes to those services and substitution of those services for other services simple administrative functions. If widespread implementation of these embodiments are adopted in the industry, this should create positive competitive market forces and raise the quality bar of widespread offerings in the industry.
Embodiments of the disclosure enable API publishers to create specifications and securely deploy and publish the specifications at scale. Embodiments of the disclosure also provide analytics and operational tools to enable API publishers to create correct API specifications that will work in the exchange.
Also, developers will have access to the same experience where they can register for the exchange and develop offerings with APIs and design, securely deploy, and publish those APIs in the marketplace. Developers have the flexibility of creating solutions that work with multiple APIs so that different dealers that use potentially competing services could still take advantage of the same developer solution.
Furthermore, dealer IT can go into the marketplace and see the solutions that are available in the marketplace. Once parties associated with dealer IT are authenticated they can enable entitlements that integrate their dealer services with solutions that are purchased and managed in the marketplace. At any time they can return to the marketplace and alter enablements by either stopping or switching services that they enable with solutions. The marketplace may also support orchestration services that will allow dealer IT to easily enhance workflow with what today would be considered expensive and custom point-to-point solutions, which in many cases are not even possible without a common exchange and standards.
These scenarios illustrate how embodiments disclosed herein enable a seamless customer experience that drives value across an entire ecosystem. Platforms according to these embodiments are designed to enable network effects for dealers and developers at scale.
A few example embodiments disclosed herein include a connected store (OEM), a connected car end-to-end (dealer), and inventory management (ISV). Each of these example embodiments will be discussed below.
Connected Store (OEM)
OEMs often have access to large amounts of powerful data and insights around consumers and consumers' propensity to buy or update a vehicle based on dealer service utilization. An OEM could develop a set of APIs and make them accessible through the marketplace. The OEM could mandate that its dealer networks use their APIs and provide a consistent set of experience and data across multiple channels. Examples of channels that could facilitate provision of experience and data include CDK Global® Sites, third party portal sites, dealer sites, and own OEM sites (when it comes to inventory, pricing, trade-in payments, credit and F&I). These services could be easily integrated into third party tools like Deal Dash® and integrate with unique in-store capabilities such as Customer Relationship Management (CRM), desking solutions, and customer showroom tools. The data exchange and configuration would be facilitated by the marketplaces disclosed herein (e.g., CDK Global's Zebrafish Marketplace). OEMs currently do not have the capability to practice embodiments disclosed herein because hundreds of custom solutions would be needed to support their dealer networks. With marketplaces disclosed herein it quickly becomes an activity to write API specifications and make the specifications available through the Zebrafish Developer Network, work with developers to create solutions for their dealer markets, and have dealer IT drive the solution entitlement through the marketplace.
Connected Car End-to-End (Dealer)
Another example is a customer getting a service notification through vehicle telemetry in their connected car. Marketplaces disclosed herein could broker data exchange between the consumer and dealer operations around quoting, service pricing, and repair order management. These marketplaces could also drive the integration with a dealer's connected lot and all of its service lane capabilities such as scheduling, lane, inspect, notify, payment, and parts and inventory management. Today these scenarios have multiple break points because existing systems only allow for point-to-point integrations. Marketplaces disclosed herein, however, could enable a true workflow and orchestration with notification services, for example, that provide a seamless experience to the customer.
Inventory Management (ISV)
Marketplaces disclosed herein can also enable scenarios around inventory management and give dealers a greater reach and funnel by driving integration of inventory and quoting with a third-party website. By way of non-limiting examples, a consumer may be enabled thereby to initiate a geographic search on automobiles through integration with APIs around Mobile Visual Search (MVS) and quoting, generating a penny-accurate quote that a consumer could take right to a dealer. Orchestration could provide extra value with this experience by offering turn-by-turn directions to the dealer of choice. Because all data may pass through the exchange, dynamic campaign and spot advertising may be supported based on where a customer is located geographically. Once a customer is at a dealer, the same visibility into data may guide a dealer into the most appropriate service upselling based on search parameters the customer entered in a third-party website.
These are just a few examples of what the marketplaces disclosed herein can enable today with services like Standard Positioning Service (SPS), MVS, quote, and appointments. As marketplaces disclosed herein gain traction thousands of partners will be able to independently develop and consume APIs to connect with dealers through the marketplace exchange. These examples illustrate how Zebrafish enables a seamless customer experience that drives value across an entire ecosystem and enables network effects for dealers and developers at scale.
Additional features that may be included in the marketplaces disclosed herein include comprehensive and open platform integration, proven enterprise-level support that is responsive and reliable, and enterprise-grade security to enable data transfer between data sources and applications.
Embodiments disclosed herein turn what in the past had to be a point-to-point solution via a partner interface process (PIP) that required custom contract negotiation and bespoke API enablement can now turn into a turnkey, self-service process that allows a developer or OEM to publish APIs and solutions once that can serve an unlimited number of customers. This will create value and revenue across the ecosystem by removing friction in access to data that traditional partnership efforts still use.
In some embodiments, the marketplace may include user interfaces configured to enable parties to register with the exchange. The user interfaces may enable these parties to provide APIs on the exchange.
As used herein, the term “module” refers to a software module including computer-readable instructions stored on one or more data storage devices and configured to instruct one or more processors to perform functions of the module.
In some embodiments, a computer server includes: one or more processors of an automotive commerce exchange platform and one or more computer-readable storage media operably coupled to the one or more processors. The one or more computer-readable storage media have computer-readable instructions stored thereon. The computer-readable instructions are configured to instruct the one or more processors to execute a plurality of different software interfaces with a plurality of different DMS systems and provide a standardized software interface. The standardized software interface is configured to enable communication between the one or more processors of the automotive commerce exchange platform and a plurality of different devices of entities involved with an automotive market. The standardized software interface is also configured to enable the plurality of different devices access to each of the plurality of different DMS systems independent of local software interfaces of the plurality of different devices with each of the different DMS systems.
In some embodiments, the entities involved with the automotive market include a dealer, a software developer of automotive dealer software, an automotive service provider, and a dealership software system integrator.
In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to enable the plurality of different devices to test software interfaces between the one or more processors and the plurality of DMS systems without actually accessing the plurality of DMS systems during the test.
In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to enable users of the plurality of different devices to set terms and conditions, pricing, guidelines, or combinations thereof for software interfaces provided by the users.
In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to provide a developer network configured to enable software developers to explore the various software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different devices.
In some embodiments, the developer network is further configured to enable the software developers to try to test the available software interfaces.
In some embodiments, the developer network is further configured to enable the software developers to access guidelines and access terms and conditions associated with the available software interfaces.
In some embodiments, the developer network includes a forum for developers of APIs across multiple different DMS systems to participate in online discussions.
In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to provide an environment (e.g., an online environment). In this environment, software provided through the automotive commerce exchange platform (e.g., software that utilizes at least one of the plurality of different interfaces) can be used by end users.
In some embodiments, the automotive commerce exchange platform is configured to serve as an interface for subscription and billing between developers of software provided by the automotive commerce exchange platform, providers of the plurality of different software interfaces, and the end users.
In some embodiments a computer server includes one or more communication devices and one or more processors. The one or more communication devices are configured to communicate with a plurality of different DMS systems and a plurality of different automotive software developer devices. The one or more processors are configured to execute different software interfaces to access the plurality of different DMS systems through the communication device, and provide a developer network configured to enable software developers to explore, using the plurality of different automotive software developer devices, the different software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different devices for use in development of automotive software by the software developers.
In some embodiments, the developer network is also configured to enable the software developers to test use of the different software interfaces by their automotive software without actually accessing any of the plurality of different DMS systems.
In some embodiments, the developer network is also configured to provide an online forum to facilitate online discussions regarding automotive software development.
In some embodiments, the developer network is also configured to enable the software developers to set terms and conditions, pricing, or both, which are associated with their automotive software that is part of the automotive commerce exchange platform.
In some embodiments, the one or more processors are also configured to provide a marketplace including an online environment to enable end users of the automotive software to use the automotive software of the automotive commerce exchange platform.
In some embodiments, a computer server includes one more communication devices and one or more processors. The one or more communication devices are configured to communicate with a plurality of different DMS systems and a plurality of different automotive software developer devices. The one or more processors are configured to execute different software interfaces to access the plurality of different DMS systems through the communication device. The one or more processors are also configured to provide a marketplace including an online environment to enable end users of automotive software configured to access the plurality of different DMS systems of the automotive commerce exchange platform using the different software interfaces.
In some embodiments, the one or more processors are also configured to provide online management of subscriptions and billing between developers of the automotive software, providers of the different software interfaces, and the end users.
In some embodiments, the one or more processors are configured to enable the end users to electronically search through the automotive software of the automotive commerce exchange platform.
In some embodiments, the one or more processors are configured to enable the end users to electronically search through the automotive software by categories of the automotive software.
In some embodiments, categories of the automotive software include at least one category taken from the group consisting of repair order software, electronic payment software, automobile quote software, DMS software, tax engine software, automobile sales software, automobile parts software, automotive-related entity accounting software, and automotive-related entity employee software.
The exchange platform 300 includes a transaction management layer 220 (“transaction management” 220), a developer network layer 230 (“developer network” 230), and a provisioning layer 240 (“provisioning” 240). The transaction management 220 includes consistent APIs 222, API test 224, event management 226, and analytics/insights 228. The consistent APIs 222 include standardized APIs (e.g., pre-provided APIs) that enable parties to access information from other parties (e.g., to enable a consumer to access appointments at a vehicle repair shop or automobile dealer, etc.). As a result, developers do not need to spend valuable time and money resources on developing APIs because these APIs are provided.
The API test 224 provides developers with example data that is similar to that which may be extracted by APIs of the consistent APIs 222. As a result, a developer may be enabled to test software using the example data without actually connecting to an actual party and actually accessing the live data at the actual party. This makes the development process simpler because the developer does not have to waste resources setting up trial accounts with the various parties participating in the exchange platform 300 in order to test software that is under development.
The analytics/insights 228 provides analytics for various parties. For example, analytics may be provided regarding the party that provides the exchange platform 300. Also by way of non-limiting example, the analytics/insights 228 may be configured to provide analytics regarding developers that provide APIs to the exchange platform 300. As a further, non-limiting example, the analytics/insights 228 may be configure to provide analytics regarding consumers of the APIs (e.g., how much money a developer owes to the platform, how many times a party used an API, etc.). As a result, insights for usage of the exchange platform 300 by various parties may be provided to various parties.
The developer network 230 provides the capability to build specifically for developers to make their onboarding frictionless, and provide for seamless onboarding and a seamless experience for developers. The developer network 230 includes a developer portal 232, the API test 224 (as discussed above), a forum/community 236, and a monetization 238. The developer portal 232 enables developers to go online and explore the various APIs that are available through the exchange platform 300, try to test these available APIs (e.g., using the API test 224), access API guidelines, and access terms and conditions for the APIs.
The forum/community 236 enables parties to post questions or comments online to spur discussions about these questions or comments. For example, if a party has a question, the party may post the question online and other parties can view and respond to the question.
The monetization 238 provides developers with a way to benefit from the APIs/software that they provide to the exchange platform 300. By way of non-limiting example, a developer may be enabled to submit an API, set his/her own terms and conditions, and set his/her own pricing structure (e.g., price for a subscription or purchase, etc.). Once the API is submitted, an administrator of the exchange platform 300 can review and approve or decline the API, terms and conditions, pricing structure, privacy policy, etc. Once approved, anybody can access the API, and the developer can start making money based on their own pricing structure.
The provisioning 240 includes a marketplace 242, configurable workflows 244, and billing/subscription 246. The marketplace 242 is an environment where software that utilizes one or more APIs provided by the exchange platforms can be used or consumed by the end user. The marketplace 242 may enable the end user to search through various software solutions (e.g., by category), try the solutions to see whether the solutions serve the desired purpose, and enable the solutions. The configurable workflows 244 enable the end user to configure their enabled solutions.
Once a solution is enabled in the marketplace 242, the billing/subscription 246 is configured to bill the end user for the use of the enabled solutions. The billing/subscription 246 may be configured to provide the funds owed to the developers of the enabled software solution and the providers of the APIs used by the enabled software solution as the end user uses the enabled software solution. In other words, the exchange platform 300 may serve as a financial bank between the developers, the API providers, and the end users.
The micro services 250 include examples of APIs provided by the API providers. For example, the micro services 250 include repair order API 252, an e-payments API 254, a quote engine API 256, a DMS API 257, and a tax engine API 258. These examples should not be viewed as limiting. Rather, any API that facilitates any exchange of information between any of the parties discussed above may be used by the exchange platform 300.
The system 200 is secure, enables self-service, and is extensible, highly available, and flexible.
Communication between the exchange platform 300 and the devices 202, 204, 206, 207, and 208 of the partners, the dealers, the developers, the service providers, and the system integrators, respectively, may be performed using one or more networks (e.g., the Internet, cellular data networks, wide area, local area, and personal area networks (WANs, LANs, PANs); switched networks (e.g., publicly switched networks); cloud networks; other networks; wireless networks; wired networks; or combinations thereof). Also, any of the blocks 202-258 illustrated in
Furthermore, each of the exchange platform 300, the micro services 250, and the devices 202, 204, 206, 207, 208 may include one or more computing devices (e.g., desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smart phones, point-of-sale (POS) stations, other electronic devices, or combinations thereof). A computing device may include at least a processor or processors operably coupled to a computer-readable storage medium or media (e.g., a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as volatile or non-volatile data storage device). The processor may include a central processing unit (CPU), a microcontroller, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a programmable logic controller (PLC), other programmable circuitry, or combinations thereof. The computing device may also include one or more communication devices (e.g., wireless and/or wired network communication devices such as WiFi communication devices, cellular data communication devices, Ethernet communication devices, Bluetooth communication devices etc.) operably coupled to the processor. The one or more communication devices are configured to communicate through WANs such as the Internet, LANs, virtual private networks (VPNs), personal area networks (PANs) such as Bluetooth or Zigbee networks, cloud networks, other networks, or combinations thereof.
The industry-enabled services 372 include services provided by the exchange platform 300 for the automotive industry. These services may include software related services using software modules developed by developers in the automotive software space using APIs provided through the automotive commerce exchange platform 300. By way of non-limiting example, the industry-enabled services 372 may include a sales module 373, a service module 374, a parts module 376, an accounting module 377, and an employee module 378. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many other modules for industry-enabled services 372 may be included within the scope of the present disclosure.
The data warehouse 396 includes data indicating, at a high level, information corresponding to products and information that are provided through the exchange platform 300. This data may be used by the exchange platform 300 to make high level decisions, such as management of product, financial, and data flows through the exchange platform 300. By way of non-limiting example, the data warehouse 396 may include information indicating APIs provided through the exchange platform 300, software products provided and operated using the exchange platform 300, and information relevant to making approval decisions for APIs and software products to be distributed through the exchange platform 300.
The brand/online experience 360 includes a presentation layer 362 and a workflow layer 364. The presentation layer 362 is configured to present the APIs and service of the exchange platform 300 in a Web or Internet setting. As a result, the presentation layer 362 may include websites having Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) to enable consumers to access the exchange platform 300 through web browser software executed by personal electronic devices (e.g., personal computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smartphones, etc.).
The store experience 380 includes a workflow layer 382 and a presentation layer 384 similar to the workflow layer 364 and the presentation layer 362 of the brand/online experience 360. One difference, however, is that the presentation layer 384 may focus more on presenting the APIs and services of the exchange platform 300 in a store environment (e.g., in an automobile dealership). In such embodiments, the presentation layer 384 may include a VPN to enable consumers of the exchange platform's 300 products to access the exchange platform 300 through in-store devices (e.g., point of sale systems, dealership computer systems and devices, etc.). This access to the exchange platform 300 may be provided using a thin client or thick client architecture. As illustrated in
As previously discussed with respect to
Also, the system 400 serves as the foundation of a first-class developer experience. For example, the developers 402A, 402B, and 402C do not have to know the requirements of developing APIs 412 with the DMS providers 404 and can write the code for the interfaces 410 just once, in contrast to several APIs 110 as discussed above with reference to
The system 400 also enables third-party developers 402 to access DMS providers 404 through standard interfaces 410. The system 400 provides dealers the flexibility to use best in class modules to fulfill a given business workflow. The system 400 enables OEMs to innovate regardless of the software vendors being used by their dealerships. Furthermore, knowing the API definition and naming conventions will allow big data predictive analytical insights (e.g., appointment name must be consistent across the exchange platform 300 to enable knowledge that it is an appointment). Furthermore, the system 400 enables a single party to own the entire automotive transaction.
Guiding principles for embodiments disclosed herein may include one or more of the following:
A world-class developer experience;
Cloud native patterns, practices, and technology;
A focus on interactions in the network;
Transactions with persistent data-enabled powerful insights;
Curation is the new quality control; and
End-to-end security.
It will be apparent to those having skill in the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/646,199, which was filed on Mar. 21, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3792445 | Bucks et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
4258421 | Juhasz et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
5003476 | Abe | Mar 1991 | A |
5034889 | Abe | Jul 1991 | A |
5058044 | Stewart et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5421015 | Khoyi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5442553 | Parrillo | Aug 1995 | A |
5452446 | Johnson | Sep 1995 | A |
5521815 | Rose, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5649186 | Ferguson | Jul 1997 | A |
5694595 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5729452 | Smith et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5764943 | Wechsler | Jun 1998 | A |
5787177 | Leppek | Jul 1998 | A |
5790785 | Klug et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5835712 | Dufresne | Nov 1998 | A |
5845299 | Arora et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862346 | Kley et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5911145 | Arora et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5956720 | Fernandez et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974149 | Leppek | Oct 1999 | A |
5974418 | Blinn et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974428 | Gerard et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978776 | Seretti et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987506 | Carter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003635 | Bantz et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006201 | Berent et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009410 | Lemole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6018748 | Smith | Jan 2000 | A |
6021416 | Dauerer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021426 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026433 | D'Arlach et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041310 | Green et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041344 | Bodamer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055541 | Solecki et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061698 | Chadha et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067559 | Allard et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070164 | Vagnozzi | May 2000 | A |
6134532 | Lazarus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151609 | Truong | Nov 2000 | A |
6178432 | Cook et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181994 | Colson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185614 | Cuomo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189104 | Leppek | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216129 | Eldering | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219667 | Lu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236994 | Schwartz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240365 | Bunn | May 2001 | B1 |
6263268 | Nathanson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285932 | De Bellefeuille et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289382 | Bowman-Amuah | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295061 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6330499 | Chou et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343302 | Graham | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353824 | Boguraev et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356822 | Diaz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374241 | Lamburt et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397226 | Sage | May 2002 | B1 |
6397336 | Leppek | May 2002 | B2 |
6401103 | Ho et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421733 | Tso et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6473849 | Keller et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496855 | Hunt et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505106 | Lawrence et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505205 | Kothuri et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519617 | Wanderski et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535879 | Behera | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539370 | Chang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546216 | Mizoguchi et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553373 | Boguraev et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556904 | Larson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564216 | Waters | May 2003 | B2 |
6571253 | Thompson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6581061 | Graham | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583794 | Wattenberg | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594664 | Estrada et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606525 | Muthuswamy et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629148 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643663 | Dabney et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654726 | Hanzek | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6678706 | Fishel | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697825 | Underwood et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701232 | Yamaki | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721747 | Lipkin | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728685 | Ahluwalia | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738750 | Stone et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744735 | Nakaguro | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748305 | Klausner et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785864 | Te et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795819 | Wheeler et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6823258 | Ukai et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823359 | Heidingsfeld | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826594 | Pettersen | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847988 | Toyouchi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850823 | Eun et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871216 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6901430 | Smith | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6894601 | Grunden et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6917941 | Wight et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922674 | Nelson | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6941203 | Chen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944677 | Zhao | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954731 | Montague et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963854 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965806 | Eryurek et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965968 | Touboul | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6978273 | Bonneau et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981028 | Rawat et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990629 | Heaney et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6993421 | Pillar | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000184 | Matveyenko et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003476 | Samra et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010495 | Samra et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7028072 | Kliger et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031554 | Iwane | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039704 | Davis et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047318 | Svedloff | May 2006 | B1 |
7062343 | Ogushi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062506 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072943 | Landesmann | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092803 | Kapolka et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107268 | Zawadzki et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7124116 | Huyler | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152207 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7155491 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7171418 | Blessin | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184866 | Squires et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7197764 | Cichowlas | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7219234 | Ashland et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7240125 | Fleming | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246263 | Skingle | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7281029 | Rawat | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287000 | Boyd et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7322007 | Schowtka et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7386786 | Davis et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7401289 | Lachhwani et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406429 | Salonen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433891 | Haber et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457693 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7477968 | Lowrey | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7480551 | Lowrey et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7496543 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7502672 | Kolls | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7536641 | Rosenstein et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7548985 | Guigui | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587504 | Adams et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590476 | Shumate | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593925 | Cadiz et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593999 | Nathanson | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613627 | Doyle | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620484 | Chen | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7624342 | Matveyenko et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7657594 | Banga et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664667 | Ruppelt et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7739007 | Logsdon | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747680 | Ravikumar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7778841 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7801945 | Geddes et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7818380 | Tamura et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861309 | Spearman et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865409 | Monaghan | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7870253 | Muilenburg et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7899701 | Odom | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7908051 | Oesterling | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7979506 | Cole | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8010423 | Bodin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019501 | Breed | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036788 | Breed | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051159 | Muilenburg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055544 | Ullman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060274 | Boss et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8095403 | Price | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8099308 | Uyeki | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8135804 | Uyeki | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145379 | Schwinke | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8190322 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8209259 | Graham, Jr. et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212667 | Petite et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8271473 | Berg | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271547 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275717 | Ullman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8285439 | Hodges | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296007 | Swaminathan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311905 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8355950 | Colson et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8407664 | Moosmann | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428815 | Van Engelshoven et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8438310 | Muilenburg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448057 | Sugnet | May 2013 | B1 |
8521654 | Ford et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8538894 | Ullman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8645193 | Swinson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676638 | Blair et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8725341 | Ogasawara | May 2014 | B2 |
8745641 | Coker | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8849689 | Jagannathan et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8886389 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8924071 | Stanek et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8954222 | Costantino | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8996230 | Lorenz et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996235 | Singh et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9014908 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015059 | Sims et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9026304 | Olsen, III et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9047722 | Kurnik et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9165413 | Jones et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9183681 | Fish | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9325650 | Yalavarty et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9349223 | Palmer | May 2016 | B1 |
9384597 | Koch et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9477936 | Lawson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9577866 | Rogers et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9596287 | Rybak et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9619945 | Adderly et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9659495 | Modica et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9706008 | Rajan et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9715665 | Schondorf et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9754304 | Taira et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9778045 | Bang | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9836714 | Lander et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10032139 | Adderly et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10083411 | Kinsey et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10169607 | Sheth et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10229394 | Davis et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10448120 | Bursztyn et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10475256 | Chowdhury et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10552871 | Chadwick | Feb 2020 | B1 |
11117253 | Oleynik | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20010005831 | Lewin et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010037332 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039594 | Park et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010054049 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020023111 | Arora et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020024537 | Jones et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026359 | Long et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032626 | Dewolf et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032701 | Gao et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042738 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046245 | Hillar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049831 | Platner et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052778 | Murphy et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059260 | Jas | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065698 | Schick et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065739 | Florance et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069110 | Sonnenberg | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073080 | Lipkin | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082978 | Ghouri et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091755 | Narin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107739 | Schlee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111727 | Vanstory et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111844 | Vanstory et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116418 | Lachhwani et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123359 | Wei et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124053 | Adams et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129054 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133273 | Lowrey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138331 | Hosea et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143646 | Boyden et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154146 | Rodriquez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169851 | Weathersby et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173885 | Lowrey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188869 | Patrick | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196273 | Krause | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198761 | Ryan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198878 | Baxter et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014443 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023632 | Ries et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033378 | Needham et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036832 | Kokes et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036964 | Boyden et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037263 | Kamat et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046179 | Anabtawi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051022 | Sogabe et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055666 | Roddy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061263 | Riddle | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065532 | Takaoka | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065583 | Takaoka | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069785 | Lohse | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069790 | Kane | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074392 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095038 | Dix | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101262 | Godwin | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115292 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120502 | Robb et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030145310 | Thames et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177050 | Crampton et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177175 | Worley et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030225853 | Wang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229623 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233246 | Snapp et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040012631 | Skorski | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039646 | Hacker | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041818 | White et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073546 | Forster et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073564 | Haber et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088228 | Mercer et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093243 | Bodin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117046 | Colle et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122735 | Meshkin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128320 | Grove et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139203 | Graham, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148342 | Cotte | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040156020 | Edwards | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040163047 | Nagahara et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181464 | Vanker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199413 | Hauser et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220863 | Porter et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225664 | Casement | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230897 | Latzel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040255233 | Croney et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267263 | May | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268225 | Walsh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268232 | Tunning | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015491 | Koeppel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021197 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027611 | Wharton | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065804 | Worsham et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096963 | Myr et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108112 | Ellenson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114270 | Hind et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114764 | Gudenkauf et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108637 | Sahota et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149398 | McKay | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171836 | Leacy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050176482 | Raisinghani et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187834 | Painter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198121 | Daniels et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228736 | Norman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256755 | Chand et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267774 | Merritt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268282 | Laird | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289020 | Bruns et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050289599 | Matsuura et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031811 | Ernst et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059253 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064637 | Rechterman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060123330 | Horiuchi et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129423 | Sheinson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129982 | Doyle | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136105 | Larson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161841 | Horiuchi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200751 | Underwood et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224447 | Koningstein | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248442 | Rosenstein et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265355 | Taylor | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271844 | Suklikar | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277588 | Harrington et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282328 | Gerace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005446 | Fusz et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016486 | Stone et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027754 | Collins et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033087 | Combs et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033520 | Kimzey et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053513 | Hoffberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100519 | Engel | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150368 | Arora et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070209011 | Padmanabhuni et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226540 | Konieczny | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250229 | Wu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250327 | Hedy | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250840 | Coker et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271154 | Broudy et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271330 | Mattox et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271389 | Joshi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282711 | Ullman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282712 | Ullman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282713 | Ullman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288413 | Mizuno et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294192 | Tellersen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010561 | Bay | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015921 | Libman | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015929 | Koeppel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027827 | Eglen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080119983 | Inbarajan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080172632 | Stambaugh | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189143 | Wurster | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195435 | Bentley et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195932 | Oikawa et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201163 | Barker et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080255925 | Vailaya et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090012887 | Taub et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024918 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043780 | Hentrich, Jr. et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070435 | Abhyanker | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089134 | Uyeki | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106036 | Tamura et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112687 | Blair et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138329 | Wanker | May 2009 | A1 |
20090182232 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187513 | Noy et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187939 | Lajoie | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198507 | Rhodus | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204454 | Lagudi | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204655 | Wendelberger | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222532 | Finlaw | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090265607 | Raz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090313035 | Esser et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011415 | Cortes | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023393 | Costy et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100070343 | Taira et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082778 | Muilenburg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082780 | Muilenburg et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088158 | Pollack | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100259 | Geiter | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100506 | Marot | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131363 | Sievert et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100235219 | Merrick et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235231 | Jewer | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100293030 | Wu | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312608 | Shan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318408 | Sankaran et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324777 | Tominaga et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110010432 | Uyeki | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015989 | Tidwell et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022525 | Swinson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110082804 | Swinson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110145064 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161167 | Jallapuram | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110191264 | Inghelbrecht et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196762 | Dupont | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224864 | Gellatly et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231055 | Knight et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110288937 | Manoogian, III | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110307296 | Hall et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307411 | Bolivar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120066010 | Williams | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089474 | Xiao et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095804 | Calabrese et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116868 | Chin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158211 | Chen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120209714 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221125 | Bell | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120268294 | Michaelis | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278886 | Luna | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284113 | Pollak | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120316981 | Hoover et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130046432 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130080196 | Schroeder et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080305 | Virag | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130151334 | Berkhin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191445 | Gayman et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204484 | Ricci | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226699 | Long | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130325541 | Capriotti et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332023 | Bertosa et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012659 | Yan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140026037 | Garb et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140088866 | Knapp et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140094992 | Lambert et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122178 | Knight | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136278 | Carvalho | May 2014 | A1 |
20140229391 | East et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244110 | Tharaldson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140277906 | Lowrey et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140278805 | Thompson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324275 | Stanek et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324536 | Cotton | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140331301 | Subramani et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337163 | Whisnant | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140379530 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150057875 | McGinnis et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150066781 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150066933 | Kolodziej et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100199 | Kurnik et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150142256 | Jones | May 2015 | A1 |
20150227894 | Mapes, Jr. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150268059 | Borghesani et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150278886 | Fusz | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150286979 | Ming et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150334165 | Arling et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160004516 | Ivanov | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160059412 | Oleynik | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160071054 | Kakarala et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092944 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160132935 | Shen et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160140609 | Demir | May 2016 | A1 |
20160140620 | Pinkowish et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160140622 | Wang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160148439 | Akselrod et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160180358 | Battista | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180378 | Toshida et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160180418 | Jaeger | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160267503 | Zakai-Or et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160275533 | Smith et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160307174 | Marcelle et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160357599 | Glatfelter | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170034547 | Jain et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170039785 | Richter et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170053460 | Hauser et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170064038 | Chen | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170124525 | Johnson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170262894 | Kirti et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170293894 | Taliwal et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170308844 | Kelley | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170308864 | Kelley | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170308865 | Kelley | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170316459 | Strauss et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170337573 | Toprak | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170352054 | Ma et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180095733 | Torman et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180225710 | Kar et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180232749 | Moore, Jr. et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180285901 | Zackrone | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180285925 | Zackrone | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190334884 | Ross et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20210287106 | Jerram | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2494350 | May 2004 | CA |
0461888 | Mar 1995 | EP |
2007002759 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Final Office Action, dated Feb. 27, 2020, 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042, Final Office Action, dated Mar. 19, 2020, 35 pages. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20050528073821/http://www.kbb.com/, 1 pg. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20050531000823/http://www.carfax.com/, 1 pg. |
IBM Tivoli Access Manager Base Administration Guide, Version 5.1. 2003, International Business Machines Corporation. Entire book enclosed and cited. 402 pgs. |
Interconnection. (2003). In Roget's II The New Thesaurus. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved Jul. 16, 2009, from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/hmrogets/interconnection, 1 pg. |
Internet Archive Dan Gillmor Sep. 1, 1996. |
Internet Archive Wayback Machine, archive of LDAP Browser.com—FAQ. Archived Dec. 11, 2000. Available at <http://web.archive.org/web/200012110152/http://www.ldapbrowser.com/faq/faq.php3?sID=fe4ae66f023d86909f35e974f3a1ce>. |
Internet Archive Wayback Machine, archive of LDAP Browser.com—Product Info. Archived Dec. 11, 2000. Available at <http://web.archive.org/web/200012110541/http://www.ldapbrowser.com/prodinfo/prodinfo.php3?sID=fe4ae66f2fo23d86909f35e974f3a1ce>. |
Internet Archive: Audio Archive, http://www.archive.org/audio/audio-searchresults.php?search=@start=0&limit=100&sort=ad, printed May 12, 2004, 12 pgs. |
Internet Archive: Democracy Now, http://www.archive.org/audio/collection.php?collection=democracy_now, printed May 12, 2004, 2 pgs. |
Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) Overview, printed Mar. 6, 2010, 3 pgs. |
Java version history—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed Mar. 6, 2010, 9 pgs. |
Lee, Adam J. et al., “Searching for Open Windows and Unlocked Doors: Port Scanning in Large-Scale Commodity Clusters,” Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2005. CCGrid 2005. IEEE International Symposium on vol. 1; Publication Year: 2005. |
Michener, J.R., et al., “Managing System and Active-Content Integrity,” Computer; vol. 33, Issue: 7; Publication Year: 2000, pp. 108-110. |
Milic-Frayling, Natasa, et al., “SmartView: Enhanced Document Viewer for Mobile Devices,” Google Nov. 15, 2002, 11 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 26, 2008, 13 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 6, 2006, 11 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 22, 2009, 22 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 29, 2006, 11 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 12, 2007, 10 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 29, 2008, 10 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 1, 2010, 19 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,796, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated May 19, 2005, 7 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 17, 2007, 12 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 9, 2005, 14 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 22, 2004, 10 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,465, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 27, 2004, 9 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,606, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 19, 2005, 7 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,606, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated May 17, 2004, 5 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 30, 2010, 23 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2008, 11 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 14, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 17, 2007, 11 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 13, 2008, 14 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 6, 2009, 6 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,939, filed May 1, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 19, 2010, 7 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,939, filed May 1, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 9, 2010, 11 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 1, 2011, 23 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 12, 2009, 19 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 3, 2008, 14 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 1, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 27, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 11, 2009, 20 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 14, 2011, 19 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 10, 2011, 18 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 16, 2009, 20 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 16, 2013, 5 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 17, 2011, 8 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,855, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 14, 2010, 6 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,861, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 8, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 22, 2016, 16 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 5, 2013, 15 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 6, 2017, 17 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 18, 2014, 15 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 30, 2016, 23 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 20, 2017. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 21, 2018. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, filed Apr. 21, 2016, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 30, 2019, 26 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,820, filed Apr. 21, 2016, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 23, 2018. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, filed May 23, 2017, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 3, 2018. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019. |
Non-Final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, filed Apr. 21, 2016, mailed by United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Jan. 30, 2019, 26 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 7, 2012, 15 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,796, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 1, 2006, 5 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2008, 6 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,465, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 21, 2005, 4 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,606, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 4, 2006, 8 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2009, 7 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,939, filed May 1, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 2, 2010, pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 30, 2012, 6 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 9, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 6, 2013, 22 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 23, 2012, 19 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 27, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,855, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 22, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,855, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 28, 2010, 5 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,861, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 6, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Notice of Non-compliant Amendment dated Dec. 12, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810. |
Permissions in the Java™ 2 SDK, printed Mar. 6, 2010, 45 pgs. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 7, 2010. |
Strebe, Matthew et al. MCSE: NT Server 4 Study Guide, Third Edition. 2000, Sybex Inc. Front matter, pp. 284-293, and 308-347 are included Entire book cited, 36 pgs. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 19, 2013, 3 pgs. |
Trademark Application, U.S. Appl. No. 76/375,405. 13 pages of advertising material and other application papers enclosed. Available from Trademark Document Retrieval system. |
Trademark Electronic Search System record for U.S. Appl. No. 76/375,405, Word Mark “NITRA”. |
“XTimes Newsletter”, vol. 7, 2013, 4 pages. |
“An Appointment with Destiny—The Time for Web-Enabled Scheduling has Arrived”, Link Fall, 2007, 2 pages. |
“How a Solution found a Problem of Scheduling Service Appointments”, Automotive News, 2016, 4 pages. |
“Openbay Announces First-of-its-Kind Connected Car Repair Service”, openbay.com, Mar. 31, 2015, 14 pages. |
“Service Advisor”, Automotive Dealership Institute, 2007, 26 pages. |
“XTime.com Web Pages”, Jan. 8, 2015, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, Advisory Action, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 26, 2019, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Advisory Action, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Final Office Action, dated May 17, 2019, 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2019, 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2019, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2019, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,820, Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 28, 2019, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042, Non-Final Office Action, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048, Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 30, 2019, 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 18, 2019, 6 pages. |
Bedell, Dallas Morning News, “I Know Someone Who Knows Kevin Bacon”. Oct. 27, 1998. 4 pgs. |
Chatterjee, et al., “On-board diagnostics not just for racing anymore”, EDN.com, May 6, 2013, 7 pages. |
Croswell, “Service Shop Optimiztion”, Modern Tire Retailer, May 21, 2013, 7 pages. |
Drawbaugh, “Automatic Link Review: an expensive way to learn better driving habits”, Endgadget.com, Nov. 26, 2013, 14 pages. |
Emmanuel, “Basics to Creating an Appointment System for Automotive Service Customers”, Automotiveservicemanagement.com, 2006, 9 pages. |
Jenkins, “Real-time vehicle performance monitoring with data intergrity”, A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University, Oct. 2006, 57 pages. |
Lavrinc, “First Android-powered infotainment system coming to 2012 Saab 9-3”, Autoblog.com, Mar. 2, 2011, 8 pages. |
Needham, “Google Now Taking Appointments for Auto Repair Shops”, Autoshopsolutions.com, Aug. 25, 2015, 6 pages. |
openbay.com Web Pages, Openbay.com, retrieved from archive.org May 14, 2019, Apr. 2015, 6 pages. |
openbay.com Web Pages, Openbay.com, retrieved from archive.org on May 14, 2019, Feb. 2014, 2 pages. |
openbay.com Web Pages, Openbay.com, retrieved from archive.org, May 14, 2019, Mar. 2015, 11 pages. |
Phelan, “Smart phone app aims to automate car repairs”, Detroit Free Press Auto Critic, Mar. 31, 2015, 2 pages. |
Pubnub Staff, “Streaming Vehicle Data in Realtime with Automatic (Pt 1)”, Pubnub.com, Aug. 17, 2015, 13 pages. |
Warren, “This Device Determines What Ails Your Car and Finds a Repair Shop—Automatically”, CarAndDriver.com, Apr. 8, 2015, 7 pages. |
You, et al., “Overview of Remote Diagnosis and Maintenance for Automotive Systems”, 2005 SAE World Congress, Apr. 11-14, 2015, 10 pages. |
“NetFormx Offers Advanced Network Discovery Software”. PR Newswire. Mar. 15, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-54102907.html>. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 12, 2018. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, filed May 23, 2017, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 31, 2019, 3 pgs. |
Aloisio, Giovanni et al., “Web-based access to the Grid using the Grid Resource Broker portal,” Google 2002, pp. 1145-1160. |
Anonymous, “Software ready for prime time.” Automotive News. Detroit, Nov. 5, 2001. vol. 76, Issue 5996, p. 28. |
Chadwick, D. W., “Understanding X.500—The Directory.” Available at <http://sec.cs.kent.ac.uk/x500book/>. 1996. Entire work cited. |
Chen, Deren, “Business to Business Standard and Supply Chain System Framework in Virtual Enterprises,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, The Sixth International Conference on, 2001; Publication Year: 2001, pp. 472-476. |
CNY Business Journal, “Frank La Voila named Southern Tier Small-Business Person of 1999”. Jun. 11, 1999. 2 pgs. |
Davis, Peter T. et al., “Sams Teach Yourself Microsoft Windows NT Server 4 in 21 Days,” Sams® Publishing, © 1999. ISBN: 0-672-31555-6, 15 pgs., printed Dec. 21, 2008. |
Derfler, Frank J. et al., “How Networks Work: Millennium Edition,” Que, A Division of Macmillan Computer Publishing, © 2000. ISBN: 0-7897-2445-6, 9 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 6, 2011, 26 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 3, 2010, 24 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 5, 2005, 12 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 18, 2006, 15 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 14, 2007, 13 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,465, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 5, 2005, 8 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 24, 2010, 22 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 7, 2008, 11 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 8, 2011, 21 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 11, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 4, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 7, 2009, 19 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 21, 2010, 28 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 29, 2011, 26 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 8, 2010, 12 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 27, 2010, 13 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 26, 2012, 11 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 3, 2010,16 pgs. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305055408/http://www.dealerclick.com/, 1 pg. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 24, 2011, 13 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,861, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 22, 2011, 5 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 28, 2015, 25 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 20, 2016, 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 13, 2018, 11 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 12, 2013, 13 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 20, 2011 and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 20, 2016, 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 11, 2019 , 16 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 16, 2018. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 6, 2016, 26 pgs. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, filed May 23, 2017, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 21, 2018. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,820. |
Hogue et al., “Thresher: Automating the Unwrapping of Semantic Content from the World Wide Web,” ACM 2005, pp. 86-95. |
Housel, Barron C. et al., “WebExpress: A client/intercept based system for optimizing Web browsing in a wireless environment,” Google 1998, pp. 419-431. |
http://web.archive.org/web/20010718130244/http://chromedata.com/maing2/about/index.asp, 1 pg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793 , Final Office Action, dated Mar. 27, 2020, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042 , Non-Final Office Action, dated Aug. 4, 2020, 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048 , Final Office Action, dated Apr. 9, 2020, 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779 , Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 9, 2020, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042 , Non-Final Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2020, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048, et al., Non-Final Office Action ,dated Mar. 8, 2021 ,69 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/951,833, et al., Non-Final Office Action ,dated Feb. 4, 2021 ,10 pages. |
Clemens Grelck, et al.,“A Multithread Compiler Backend for High-Level Array Programming”,2003. |
Open Bank Project, et al., https://www.openbankproject.com/, retrieved Nov. 23, 2020 ,10 pages. |
Standards for Technology in Auto, et al., https://www.starstandard.org/, retrieved Nov. 23, 2020, 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/951,833 , Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 16, 2021, 14 pages. |
Hu, Bo , “A Platform based Distributed Service Framework for Large-scale Cloud Ecosystem Development”, IEEE Computer Society, 2015, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, et al., Notice of Allowance ,dated May 6, 2021 ,13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042, et al., Final Office Action ,dated May 5, 2021 ,38 pages. |
Johns,Pamela et al.,“Competitive intelligence in service marketing, Marketing Intelligence & Planning”, vol. 28, No. 5 ,2010 ,pp. 551-570. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793 , Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 2, 2020, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048, Final Office Action, dated Sep. 17, 2021, 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/911,154, Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 16, 2021, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190297162 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62646199 | Mar 2018 | US |