Systems and methods for an automotive commerce exchange

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11190608
  • Patent Number
    11,190,608
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 20, 2018
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 30, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed are systems and methods to provide a platform for standardizing application programming interfaces (APIs) for a plurality of different dealership management software (DMS) systems. A computer server includes one or more processors of an automotive commerce exchange platform. The one or more processors are configured to execute a plurality of different software interfaces with a plurality of different DMS systems and provide a standardized software interface. The standardized software interface is configured to enable communication between the one or more processors of the automotive commerce exchange platform and a plurality of different devices of entities involved with an automotive market. The standardized software interface is also configured to enable the plurality of different devices access to each of the plurality of different DMS systems independent of local software interfaces of the plurality of different devices with each of the different DMS systems.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure relates to networks and software for automotive commerce exchange.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of an example of a system illustrating interfaces between developers and Dealership Management Systems (DMS) providers.



FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of an automotive commerce system, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram of a system including an exchange platform of FIG. 2, according to some embodiments.



FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram of an example of a system of interfacing with multiple DMS providers, according to some embodiments.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed are systems and methods of an automotive commerce exchange that is an open platform and enables creative third-party developers, independent software vendors, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), and dealerships to consume Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and develop and market solutions to improve efficiency and innovation in the industry.


The past decade has been a period for growth for the automotive industry. The benefits of that growth, however, have been unevenly distributed. This growth has also masked headwinds that the industry must come to terms with soon. Some of these headwinds include complexity and cost pressure, diverging markets, digital demands, and shifting industry landscapes. Each of these items is discussed below:


Complexity and Cost Pressure


There will continue to be more platform sharing and more modular systems for automobiles. Regulatory pressures, however, will tighten, and prices in established markets will be flat.


Diverging Markets


OEMs will need to adapt to regional and segmented patterns of supply and demand with respect to production, supply chain, and product portfolios. Also, OEMs will need to be ready to embrace the growth opportunities in the Chinese after-sales-market.


Digital Demands


Consumers will continue to want more connectivity and will increasingly use digital sources to make their purchasing decisions.


Shifting Industry Landscapes


This relates to creating more value with alternative powertrain technologies that can emerge and satisfying consumer demand around safety and entertainment. OEMs will need to deal with the restructuring that must continue to occur in Europe to have capacity match demand and embrace the increasing competition that will occur in China.


Stakeholders in the automotive industry that will be impacted by these items include retailers, consumers, and OEMs, as discussed below:


Retailers


Retailers are facing, among other things, the following headwinds:

    • Declining Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR),
    • An inventory supply that is greater than seventy days,
    • New car incentives that are greater than ten percent of Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price (MSRP),
    • Margin compression, and
    • Market consolidation.


Consumers


Consumers are shifting toward digital tools when shopping for automobiles, are demanding a better end-to-end retail experience, and are driving omni-channel commerce and online-to-offline (O2O) experience.


OEMs


OEMs are investing more in Information Technology (IT) as they strive to control more of the consumer experience to compete with the threat that comes from direct distribution.


Other influences in today's automotive industry include:


Emerging ownership and transportation models,


Disruptive entrants on the horizon,


Independent point solutions are not unlocking value,


Sales associate productivity has not improved in 25 years, and


Sales processes are more complicated today for sales associates and customers and, as a result, still take too long.


With all these issues in mind, if a dealer from 1988 were dropped into a dealership in 2018 he or she may be both bewildered and amazed by the advancement of technology, manufacturing capability, safety, efficiency, and power that are available in today's automobiles. If the 1988 dealer were asked to actually sell a car, however, he or she would be in familiar territory. For example, scheduling and preparing a car for a test drive is just as labor-intensive and inefficient today as it was in 1988. The time it takes it to sell a car and the number of people to accomplish that sale and go through approval, desking, Finance and Insurance (F&I), titling, and delivery are almost identical to similar processes of 1988. Also, he or she would actually find that the sales value chain is just as fragmented and disconnected today as it was in 1988.


There are several reasons why current technological advancements have failed to improve automobile sales processes. First, current solutions are one off and one size does not fit all. Also, it is currently very difficult for software application developers to integrate with DMSs. Furthermore, mega products rarely satisfy needs with best in class experience across the board. On top of all this, contracting and partnership agreements are slow, manual, and ultimately result in a point-to-point solution with a poor developer experience. There is currently no one place that can be a single source of information for managing transactions between different services. While existing partner programs work and are a strong foundation, these programs enable a limited value exchange when it comes to revenue, data sharing, and business value because of these constraints. A Third-Party Access Program (3PA) that offers integration that is point-to-point and not generalized to go across the systems results in a manual enablement process without a marketplace to facilitate e-commerce and without a central orchestration engine.



FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of an example of a system 100 illustrating interfaces between developers 102A, 102B, and 102C (sometimes referred to herein collectively as “developers” 102 and individually as “developer” 102) and DMS providers 104A, 104B, and 104C (sometimes referred to collectively herein as “DMS providers” 104 or individually as “DMS provider” 104). Each developer 102 would have to develop its own APIs 110AA, 110AB, 110AC, 110BA, 110BB, 110BC, 110CA, 110CB, 110CC (sometimes referred to herein collectively as “APIs” 110 or individually as “API” 110) to interface with each of the DMS providers 104.


The APIs 110 are not standardized, which is why the developers 102 would develop their own APIs 110 for each of the DMS providers 104. Developing different and separate APIs 110 for each of the DMS providers 104 incurs a high cost and consumes a significant amount of time of the developers 102. As a result, financial and time resources of the developers 102 are often tied up with these APIs 110 and little or no resources may be left for new innovation.


Systems and methods disclosed herein address these challenges and enable end-to-end automotive commerce. Systems and methods disclosed herein power an open platform that allows for easy integration of capabilities to increase sales, operational efficiency, and profitability for dealers. Embodiments of the disclosure enable end-end e-commerce for automotive industry via an open platform. Also, systems and methods disclosed herein provide standardized APIs to reduce the amount of resources developers invest in APIs, leaving more resources for innovation in other areas.


Embodiments of the disclosure include one or more of the following:


Standardized APIs to enable third-party developers to access DMS and other source of truth systems, in contrast with conventional APIs, which are not consistent or standardized and make developers' lives difficult and slow down the rate of innovation.


Best in class software modules to fulfill a given business workflow and enable consumers of the modules such as dealers, dealer group IT professionals, and end users to avail themselves of the flexibility afforded by these modules.


Flexibility to enable OEMs to innovate regardless of the software vendors being used by their dealerships.


Aggregated automotive APIs in one place to enable the community to innovate.


Aggregated automotive forums, blogs, or both in one place to enable the community to collaborate.


A marketplace that offers the capability to list, market, sell, and buy the solutions and enable seamless automated e-commerce.


Transaction aware smart orchestration to power up innovation and customer experience on the platform.


By facilitating the creation of an exchange that allows for standardized hosting of APIs and Software Development Kits (SDKs) that can be leveraged by various parties (e.g., developers, dealers, designated agents, OEMs, and industry verticals) through an automated brokering process. This enables a developer network that allows for easy creation of solutions leveraging these APIs through a modern developer experience, according to various embodiments disclosed herein.


Embodiments disclosed herein can be hosted and distributed in a marketplace. Because the exchange is the principal interface point for data, multiple value and revenue chains may be created for OEMs, dealer IT, and third-party Independent Software Venders (ISVs). Whereas in previous systems, point-to-point solutions that used custom contract negotiation and bespoke API enablement, now a turnkey, self-service process allows a developer or OEM to publish APIs and solutions once. As a result, these APIs and solutions can serve an unlimited number of customers.


Since the exchange is the intersection point for transactions and data interchange, true workflow across applications and services may be enabled. This paves the way for the future of automotive commerce by creating opportunities for the developers, dealer IT, and third-party ISVs to create powerful solutions that orchestrate activities via simple enablement and integration such as notifications, expert recommendation powered by machine learning, and targeting advertising and cross-selling based on geographic, psychographic, and other available consumer data.


As previously discussed, developers, dealers, designated agents, OEMs, and industry verticals that want to participate in automotive commerce space may be enabled to participate in automotive commerce using embodiments disclosed herein. These embodiments provide simple-to-use, scalable, and secure access to automotive commerce.


There has never previously been an easy way to combine and integrate a best-in-class solution a dealer needs without an often prohibitive amount of custom development and integration. Embodiments disclosed herein remove that barrier from dealers, allowing them to pick the solutions and services they want. Embodiments disclosed herein also make changes to those services and substitution of those services for other services simple administrative functions. If widespread implementation of these embodiments are adopted in the industry, this should create positive competitive market forces and raise the quality bar of widespread offerings in the industry.


Embodiments of the disclosure enable API publishers to create specifications and securely deploy and publish the specifications at scale. Embodiments of the disclosure also provide analytics and operational tools to enable API publishers to create correct API specifications that will work in the exchange.


Also, developers will have access to the same experience where they can register for the exchange and develop offerings with APIs and design, securely deploy, and publish those APIs in the marketplace. Developers have the flexibility of creating solutions that work with multiple APIs so that different dealers that use potentially competing services could still take advantage of the same developer solution.


Furthermore, dealer IT can go into the marketplace and see the solutions that are available in the marketplace. Once parties associated with dealer IT are authenticated they can enable entitlements that integrate their dealer services with solutions that are purchased and managed in the marketplace. At any time they can return to the marketplace and alter enablements by either stopping or switching services that they enable with solutions. The marketplace may also support orchestration services that will allow dealer IT to easily enhance workflow with what today would be considered expensive and custom point-to-point solutions, which in many cases are not even possible without a common exchange and standards.


These scenarios illustrate how embodiments disclosed herein enable a seamless customer experience that drives value across an entire ecosystem. Platforms according to these embodiments are designed to enable network effects for dealers and developers at scale.


A few example embodiments disclosed herein include a connected store (OEM), a connected car end-to-end (dealer), and inventory management (ISV). Each of these example embodiments will be discussed below.


Connected Store (OEM)


OEMs often have access to large amounts of powerful data and insights around consumers and consumers' propensity to buy or update a vehicle based on dealer service utilization. An OEM could develop a set of APIs and make them accessible through the marketplace. The OEM could mandate that its dealer networks use their APIs and provide a consistent set of experience and data across multiple channels. Examples of channels that could facilitate provision of experience and data include CDK Global® Sites, third party portal sites, dealer sites, and own OEM sites (when it comes to inventory, pricing, trade-in payments, credit and F&I). These services could be easily integrated into third party tools like Deal Dash® and integrate with unique in-store capabilities such as Customer Relationship Management (CRM), desking solutions, and customer showroom tools. The data exchange and configuration would be facilitated by the marketplaces disclosed herein (e.g., CDK Global's Zebrafish Marketplace). OEMs currently do not have the capability to practice embodiments disclosed herein because hundreds of custom solutions would be needed to support their dealer networks. With marketplaces disclosed herein it quickly becomes an activity to write API specifications and make the specifications available through the Zebrafish Developer Network, work with developers to create solutions for their dealer markets, and have dealer IT drive the solution entitlement through the marketplace.


Connected Car End-to-End (Dealer)


Another example is a customer getting a service notification through vehicle telemetry in their connected car. Marketplaces disclosed herein could broker data exchange between the consumer and dealer operations around quoting, service pricing, and repair order management. These marketplaces could also drive the integration with a dealer's connected lot and all of its service lane capabilities such as scheduling, lane, inspect, notify, payment, and parts and inventory management. Today these scenarios have multiple break points because existing systems only allow for point-to-point integrations. Marketplaces disclosed herein, however, could enable a true workflow and orchestration with notification services, for example, that provide a seamless experience to the customer.


Inventory Management (ISV)


Marketplaces disclosed herein can also enable scenarios around inventory management and give dealers a greater reach and funnel by driving integration of inventory and quoting with a third-party website. By way of non-limiting examples, a consumer may be enabled thereby to initiate a geographic search on automobiles through integration with APIs around Mobile Visual Search (MVS) and quoting, generating a penny-accurate quote that a consumer could take right to a dealer. Orchestration could provide extra value with this experience by offering turn-by-turn directions to the dealer of choice. Because all data may pass through the exchange, dynamic campaign and spot advertising may be supported based on where a customer is located geographically. Once a customer is at a dealer, the same visibility into data may guide a dealer into the most appropriate service upselling based on search parameters the customer entered in a third-party website.


These are just a few examples of what the marketplaces disclosed herein can enable today with services like Standard Positioning Service (SPS), MVS, quote, and appointments. As marketplaces disclosed herein gain traction thousands of partners will be able to independently develop and consume APIs to connect with dealers through the marketplace exchange. These examples illustrate how Zebrafish enables a seamless customer experience that drives value across an entire ecosystem and enables network effects for dealers and developers at scale.


Additional features that may be included in the marketplaces disclosed herein include comprehensive and open platform integration, proven enterprise-level support that is responsive and reliable, and enterprise-grade security to enable data transfer between data sources and applications.


Embodiments disclosed herein turn what in the past had to be a point-to-point solution via a partner interface process (PIP) that required custom contract negotiation and bespoke API enablement can now turn into a turnkey, self-service process that allows a developer or OEM to publish APIs and solutions once that can serve an unlimited number of customers. This will create value and revenue across the ecosystem by removing friction in access to data that traditional partnership efforts still use.


In some embodiments, the marketplace may include user interfaces configured to enable parties to register with the exchange. The user interfaces may enable these parties to provide APIs on the exchange.


As used herein, the term “module” refers to a software module including computer-readable instructions stored on one or more data storage devices and configured to instruct one or more processors to perform functions of the module.


In some embodiments, a computer server includes: one or more processors of an automotive commerce exchange platform and one or more computer-readable storage media operably coupled to the one or more processors. The one or more computer-readable storage media have computer-readable instructions stored thereon. The computer-readable instructions are configured to instruct the one or more processors to execute a plurality of different software interfaces with a plurality of different DMS systems and provide a standardized software interface. The standardized software interface is configured to enable communication between the one or more processors of the automotive commerce exchange platform and a plurality of different devices of entities involved with an automotive market. The standardized software interface is also configured to enable the plurality of different devices access to each of the plurality of different DMS systems independent of local software interfaces of the plurality of different devices with each of the different DMS systems.


In some embodiments, the entities involved with the automotive market include a dealer, a software developer of automotive dealer software, an automotive service provider, and a dealership software system integrator.


In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to enable the plurality of different devices to test software interfaces between the one or more processors and the plurality of DMS systems without actually accessing the plurality of DMS systems during the test.


In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to enable users of the plurality of different devices to set terms and conditions, pricing, guidelines, or combinations thereof for software interfaces provided by the users.


In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to provide a developer network configured to enable software developers to explore the various software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different devices.


In some embodiments, the developer network is further configured to enable the software developers to try to test the available software interfaces.


In some embodiments, the developer network is further configured to enable the software developers to access guidelines and access terms and conditions associated with the available software interfaces.


In some embodiments, the developer network includes a forum for developers of APIs across multiple different DMS systems to participate in online discussions.


In some embodiments, the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to provide an environment (e.g., an online environment). In this environment, software provided through the automotive commerce exchange platform (e.g., software that utilizes at least one of the plurality of different interfaces) can be used by end users.


In some embodiments, the automotive commerce exchange platform is configured to serve as an interface for subscription and billing between developers of software provided by the automotive commerce exchange platform, providers of the plurality of different software interfaces, and the end users.


In some embodiments a computer server includes one or more communication devices and one or more processors. The one or more communication devices are configured to communicate with a plurality of different DMS systems and a plurality of different automotive software developer devices. The one or more processors are configured to execute different software interfaces to access the plurality of different DMS systems through the communication device, and provide a developer network configured to enable software developers to explore, using the plurality of different automotive software developer devices, the different software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different devices for use in development of automotive software by the software developers.


In some embodiments, the developer network is also configured to enable the software developers to test use of the different software interfaces by their automotive software without actually accessing any of the plurality of different DMS systems.


In some embodiments, the developer network is also configured to provide an online forum to facilitate online discussions regarding automotive software development.


In some embodiments, the developer network is also configured to enable the software developers to set terms and conditions, pricing, or both, which are associated with their automotive software that is part of the automotive commerce exchange platform.


In some embodiments, the one or more processors are also configured to provide a marketplace including an online environment to enable end users of the automotive software to use the automotive software of the automotive commerce exchange platform.


In some embodiments, a computer server includes one more communication devices and one or more processors. The one or more communication devices are configured to communicate with a plurality of different DMS systems and a plurality of different automotive software developer devices. The one or more processors are configured to execute different software interfaces to access the plurality of different DMS systems through the communication device. The one or more processors are also configured to provide a marketplace including an online environment to enable end users of automotive software configured to access the plurality of different DMS systems of the automotive commerce exchange platform using the different software interfaces.


In some embodiments, the one or more processors are also configured to provide online management of subscriptions and billing between developers of the automotive software, providers of the different software interfaces, and the end users.


In some embodiments, the one or more processors are configured to enable the end users to electronically search through the automotive software of the automotive commerce exchange platform.


In some embodiments, the one or more processors are configured to enable the end users to electronically search through the automotive software by categories of the automotive software.


In some embodiments, categories of the automotive software include at least one category taken from the group consisting of repair order software, electronic payment software, automobile quote software, DMS software, tax engine software, automobile sales software, automobile parts software, automotive-related entity accounting software, and automotive-related entity employee software.



FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of an automotive commerce system 200, according to some embodiments. The system 200 includes an exchange platform 300, one or more micro services 250, one or more devices 202 of one or more partners (e.g., parties that partner with a developer of the exchange platform 300), one or more devices 204 of one or more dealers (e.g., dealers of vehicles such as automobiles), one or more devices 206 of one or more developers (e.g., an independent sole proprietor of the developer of the exchange platform), one or more devices 207 of one or more service providers (e.g., an independent software development group that services the automotive industry), and one or more devices 208 of one or more system integrators (e.g., consultants that assist vehicle dealerships to implement automotive sales software).


The exchange platform 300 includes a transaction management layer 220 (“transaction management” 220), a developer network layer 230 (“developer network” 230), and a provisioning layer 240 (“provisioning” 240). The transaction management 220 includes consistent APIs 222, API test 224, event management 226, and analytics/insights 228. The consistent APIs 222 include standardized APIs (e.g., pre-provided APIs) that enable parties to access information from other parties (e.g., to enable a consumer to access appointments at a vehicle repair shop or automobile dealer, etc.). As a result, developers do not need to spend valuable time and money resources on developing APIs because these APIs are provided.


The API test 224 provides developers with example data that is similar to that which may be extracted by APIs of the consistent APIs 222. As a result, a developer may be enabled to test software using the example data without actually connecting to an actual party and actually accessing the live data at the actual party. This makes the development process simpler because the developer does not have to waste resources setting up trial accounts with the various parties participating in the exchange platform 300 in order to test software that is under development.


The analytics/insights 228 provides analytics for various parties. For example, analytics may be provided regarding the party that provides the exchange platform 300. Also by way of non-limiting example, the analytics/insights 228 may be configured to provide analytics regarding developers that provide APIs to the exchange platform 300. As a further, non-limiting example, the analytics/insights 228 may be configure to provide analytics regarding consumers of the APIs (e.g., how much money a developer owes to the platform, how many times a party used an API, etc.). As a result, insights for usage of the exchange platform 300 by various parties may be provided to various parties.


The developer network 230 provides the capability to build specifically for developers to make their onboarding frictionless, and provide for seamless onboarding and a seamless experience for developers. The developer network 230 includes a developer portal 232, the API test 224 (as discussed above), a forum/community 236, and a monetization 238. The developer portal 232 enables developers to go online and explore the various APIs that are available through the exchange platform 300, try to test these available APIs (e.g., using the API test 224), access API guidelines, and access terms and conditions for the APIs.


The forum/community 236 enables parties to post questions or comments online to spur discussions about these questions or comments. For example, if a party has a question, the party may post the question online and other parties can view and respond to the question.


The monetization 238 provides developers with a way to benefit from the APIs/software that they provide to the exchange platform 300. By way of non-limiting example, a developer may be enabled to submit an API, set his/her own terms and conditions, and set his/her own pricing structure (e.g., price for a subscription or purchase, etc.). Once the API is submitted, an administrator of the exchange platform 300 can review and approve or decline the API, terms and conditions, pricing structure, privacy policy, etc. Once approved, anybody can access the API, and the developer can start making money based on their own pricing structure.


The provisioning 240 includes a marketplace 242, configurable workflows 244, and billing/subscription 246. The marketplace 242 is an environment where software that utilizes one or more APIs provided by the exchange platforms can be used or consumed by the end user. The marketplace 242 may enable the end user to search through various software solutions (e.g., by category), try the solutions to see whether the solutions serve the desired purpose, and enable the solutions. The configurable workflows 244 enable the end user to configure their enabled solutions.


Once a solution is enabled in the marketplace 242, the billing/subscription 246 is configured to bill the end user for the use of the enabled solutions. The billing/subscription 246 may be configured to provide the funds owed to the developers of the enabled software solution and the providers of the APIs used by the enabled software solution as the end user uses the enabled software solution. In other words, the exchange platform 300 may serve as a financial bank between the developers, the API providers, and the end users.


The micro services 250 include examples of APIs provided by the API providers. For example, the micro services 250 include repair order API 252, an e-payments API 254, a quote engine API 256, a DMS API 257, and a tax engine API 258. These examples should not be viewed as limiting. Rather, any API that facilitates any exchange of information between any of the parties discussed above may be used by the exchange platform 300.


The system 200 is secure, enables self-service, and is extensible, highly available, and flexible.


Communication between the exchange platform 300 and the devices 202, 204, 206, 207, and 208 of the partners, the dealers, the developers, the service providers, and the system integrators, respectively, may be performed using one or more networks (e.g., the Internet, cellular data networks, wide area, local area, and personal area networks (WANs, LANs, PANs); switched networks (e.g., publicly switched networks); cloud networks; other networks; wireless networks; wired networks; or combinations thereof). Also, any of the blocks 202-258 illustrated in FIG. 2, or in any of the subsequent FIGS. may indicate a single device or a distribution of devices, or may be a part of the same device as one or more others of the blocks 202-258 in a variety of centrally located architectures, distributed architectures, other architectures, or combinations thereof.


Furthermore, each of the exchange platform 300, the micro services 250, and the devices 202, 204, 206, 207, 208 may include one or more computing devices (e.g., desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smart phones, point-of-sale (POS) stations, other electronic devices, or combinations thereof). A computing device may include at least a processor or processors operably coupled to a computer-readable storage medium or media (e.g., a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium such as volatile or non-volatile data storage device). The processor may include a central processing unit (CPU), a microcontroller, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a programmable logic controller (PLC), other programmable circuitry, or combinations thereof. The computing device may also include one or more communication devices (e.g., wireless and/or wired network communication devices such as WiFi communication devices, cellular data communication devices, Ethernet communication devices, Bluetooth communication devices etc.) operably coupled to the processor. The one or more communication devices are configured to communicate through WANs such as the Internet, LANs, virtual private networks (VPNs), personal area networks (PANs) such as Bluetooth or Zigbee networks, cloud networks, other networks, or combinations thereof.



FIG. 3 is a simplified diagram of a system 370 including the exchange platform 300 of FIG. 2, according to some embodiments. The system 370 includes a governance system 390, a brand/online experience 360, and a store experience 380. The governance system 390 includes the automotive commerce exchange platform 300, which is discussed in more detail above with reference to FIG. 2. As discussed above, the exchange platform 300 includes the marketplace 242, the developer network 230, and the orchestration engine/transaction management 220. The exchange platform 300 also includes industry-enabled services 372 and a data warehouse 396.


The industry-enabled services 372 include services provided by the exchange platform 300 for the automotive industry. These services may include software related services using software modules developed by developers in the automotive software space using APIs provided through the automotive commerce exchange platform 300. By way of non-limiting example, the industry-enabled services 372 may include a sales module 373, a service module 374, a parts module 376, an accounting module 377, and an employee module 378. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many other modules for industry-enabled services 372 may be included within the scope of the present disclosure.


The data warehouse 396 includes data indicating, at a high level, information corresponding to products and information that are provided through the exchange platform 300. This data may be used by the exchange platform 300 to make high level decisions, such as management of product, financial, and data flows through the exchange platform 300. By way of non-limiting example, the data warehouse 396 may include information indicating APIs provided through the exchange platform 300, software products provided and operated using the exchange platform 300, and information relevant to making approval decisions for APIs and software products to be distributed through the exchange platform 300.


The brand/online experience 360 includes a presentation layer 362 and a workflow layer 364. The presentation layer 362 is configured to present the APIs and service of the exchange platform 300 in a Web or Internet setting. As a result, the presentation layer 362 may include websites having Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) to enable consumers to access the exchange platform 300 through web browser software executed by personal electronic devices (e.g., personal computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, smartphones, etc.).


The store experience 380 includes a workflow layer 382 and a presentation layer 384 similar to the workflow layer 364 and the presentation layer 362 of the brand/online experience 360. One difference, however, is that the presentation layer 384 may focus more on presenting the APIs and services of the exchange platform 300 in a store environment (e.g., in an automobile dealership). In such embodiments, the presentation layer 384 may include a VPN to enable consumers of the exchange platform's 300 products to access the exchange platform 300 through in-store devices (e.g., point of sale systems, dealership computer systems and devices, etc.). This access to the exchange platform 300 may be provided using a thin client or thick client architecture. As illustrated in FIG. 3, in-store and out-of-store workflows layers 364, 382 are intertwined through a common exchange (the exchange platform 300), enabling end-to-end automotive commerce.


As previously discussed with respect to FIG. 1 above, before the system 370 of FIG. 3 and the exchange platform 300 of FIGS. 2 and 3, developers were forced to provide different APIs to interface with each different DMS provider. The exchange platform 300 reduces or eliminates this need, as will be discussed in more detail in FIG. 4.



FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram of an example of a system 400 of interfacing with multiple DMS providers, according to some embodiments. The system 400 includes developers 402A, 402B, and 402C (sometimes referred to herein generally together as “developers” 402 and individually as “developer” 402), the exchange platform 300 of FIGS. 2 and 3, and DMS providers 404A, 404B, and 404C (sometimes referred to herein generally together as “DMS providers” 404 and individually as “DMS provider” 404). The exchange platform 300 is configured to enable end-to-end automotive commerce through a standard set of interfaces 410 that enables applications to connect with any DMS provider 404. By way of non-limiting example, the interfaces 410 may include 3PAs, which may be developed by an entity managing the exchange platform 300 or by third parties that develop the 3PAs according to standards provided by the entity managing the exchange platform 300. The exchange platform 300 then interfaces with the DMS providers 404 using APIs 412 specific to those DMS providers 404.


Also, the system 400 serves as the foundation of a first-class developer experience. For example, the developers 402A, 402B, and 402C do not have to know the requirements of developing APIs 412 with the DMS providers 404 and can write the code for the interfaces 410 just once, in contrast to several APIs 110 as discussed above with reference to FIG. 1. As another example, the developers 402 may employ a consistent naming convention to understand how interfaces 410 can be interoperable.


The system 400 also enables third-party developers 402 to access DMS providers 404 through standard interfaces 410. The system 400 provides dealers the flexibility to use best in class modules to fulfill a given business workflow. The system 400 enables OEMs to innovate regardless of the software vendors being used by their dealerships. Furthermore, knowing the API definition and naming conventions will allow big data predictive analytical insights (e.g., appointment name must be consistent across the exchange platform 300 to enable knowledge that it is an appointment). Furthermore, the system 400 enables a single party to own the entire automotive transaction.


Guiding principles for embodiments disclosed herein may include one or more of the following:


A world-class developer experience;


Cloud native patterns, practices, and technology;


A focus on interactions in the network;


Transactions with persistent data-enabled powerful insights;


Curation is the new quality control; and


End-to-end security.


It will be apparent to those having skill in the art that many changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the invention. The scope of the present invention should, therefore, be determined only by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A computer server, comprising: one or more processors of an automotive commerce exchange platform; andone or more computer-readable storage media operably coupled to the one or more processors, the one or more computer-readable storage media having computer-readable instructions stored thereon, the computer-readable instructions configured to instruct the one or more processors to: execute a plurality of different application programming interfaces (APIs) with a plurality of different dealership management software (DMS) systems, wherein each of the plurality of different APIs corresponds to a different DMS system of the plurality of different DMS systems, and each of the plurality of different APIs has different requirements specific to its corresponding DMS system;provide a standardized software interface to enable communication between the one or more processors of the automotive commerce exchange platform and a plurality of different devices of entities involved with an automotive market, and to enable the plurality of different devices access to each of the plurality of different DMS systems via the plurality of different APIs and independent of local software interfaces of the plurality of different devices with each of the different DMS systems, wherein the standardized software interface provides a uniform software interface between the one or more processors of the automotive commerce exchange platform and each of the plurality of different devices that does not require coding that accounts for the different requirements of each of the plurality of different APIs;instruct the one or more processers to enable the plurality of different devices to test the standardized software interface using exemplary data that corresponds to extracted data from the plurality of DMS systems that is accessed via the plurality of different APIs and without actually accessing the plurality of DMS systems via the plurality of APIs during a test; andinstruct the one or more processors to provide a developer network configured to enable software developers to explore various software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different devices, wherein the developer network includes a forum for developers of APIs across multiple different DMS systems to participate in online discussions.
  • 2. The computer server of claim 1, wherein the entities involved with the automotive market include one or more of a dealer, a software developer of automotive dealer software, an automotive service provider, or a dealership software system integrator.
  • 3. The computer server of claim 1, wherein the computer-readable instructions are further configured to enable users of the plurality of different devices to set terms and conditions, pricing, guidelines, or combinations thereof for software interfaces provided by the users.
  • 4. The computer server of claim 1, wherein the developer network is further configured to enable the software developers to access guidelines and access terms and conditions associated with the available software interfaces.
  • 5. The computer server of claim 1, wherein the computer-readable instructions are further configured to instruct the one or more processors to provide an environment where software using at least one of the plurality of different software interfaces provided through the automotive commerce exchange platform can be used by end users.
  • 6. The computer server of claim 5, wherein the automotive commerce exchange platform is configured to serve as an interface for subscription and billing between developers of software provided by the automotive commerce exchange platform, providers of the plurality of different software interfaces, and the end users.
  • 7. A computer server of an automotive commerce exchange platform, comprising: one or more communication devices configured to communicate with a plurality of different dealership management software (DMS) systems and a plurality of different automotive software developer devices; andone or more processors configured to: execute different software interfaces associated with the plurality of different DMS systems through the communication device, wherein each of the different software interfaces provides access to exemplary data that corresponds to extracted data from the plurality of different DMS systems that is accessed via a plurality of pre-provided application programming interfaces (APIs) connected to the plurality of DMS systems, and wherein each of the different software interfaces does not access the plurality of different DMS systems;provide a developer network configured to: enable testing, using the plurality of different automotive software developer devices, of the different software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different automotive software developer devices for use in development of automotive software;enable software developers to explore the different software interfaces that are available through the automotive commerce exchange platform via the plurality of different automotive software developer devices; andprovide a forum for developers of APIs across multiple different DMS systems to participate in online discussions; andfacilitate a test of one of the different software interfaces by one of the different automotive software devices, wherein the test is performed using the exemplary data and without actually accessing the plurality of DMS systems via the plurality of pre-provided APIs during the test.
  • 8. The computer server of claim 7, wherein the testing of the different software interfaces includes using the automotive software with the different software interfaces.
  • 9. The computer server of claim 7, wherein the developer network is also configured to enable the setting of terms and conditions, pricing, or both, which are associated with the automotive software.
  • 10. The computer server of claim 7, wherein the one or more processors are also configured to provide a marketplace including an online environment to enable end users to use the automotive software.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/646,199, which was filed on Mar. 21, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (508)
Number Name Date Kind
3792445 Bucks et al. Feb 1974 A
4258421 Juhasz et al. Mar 1981 A
4992940 Dworkin Feb 1991 A
5003476 Abe Mar 1991 A
5034889 Abe Jul 1991 A
5058044 Stewart et al. Oct 1991 A
5421015 Khoyi et al. May 1995 A
5442553 Parrillo Aug 1995 A
5452446 Johnson Sep 1995 A
5521815 Rose, Jr. May 1996 A
5649186 Ferguson Jul 1997 A
5694595 Jacobs et al. Dec 1997 A
5729452 Smith et al. Mar 1998 A
5764943 Wechsler Jun 1998 A
5787177 Leppek Jul 1998 A
5790785 Klug et al. Aug 1998 A
5835712 Dufresne Nov 1998 A
5845299 Arora et al. Dec 1998 A
5862346 Kley et al. Jan 1999 A
5911145 Arora et al. Jun 1999 A
5956720 Fernandez et al. Sep 1999 A
5974149 Leppek Oct 1999 A
5974418 Blinn et al. Oct 1999 A
5974428 Gerard et al. Oct 1999 A
5978776 Seretti et al. Nov 1999 A
5987506 Carter et al. Nov 1999 A
6003635 Bantz et al. Dec 1999 A
6006201 Berent et al. Dec 1999 A
6009410 Lemole et al. Dec 1999 A
6018748 Smith Jan 2000 A
6021416 Dauerer et al. Feb 2000 A
6021426 Douglis et al. Feb 2000 A
6026433 D'Arlach et al. Feb 2000 A
6041310 Green et al. Mar 2000 A
6041344 Bodamer et al. Mar 2000 A
6055541 Solecki et al. Apr 2000 A
6061698 Chadha et al. May 2000 A
6067559 Allard et al. May 2000 A
6070164 Vagnozzi May 2000 A
6134532 Lazarus et al. Oct 2000 A
6151609 Truong Nov 2000 A
6178432 Cook et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181994 Colson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185614 Cuomo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189104 Leppek Feb 2001 B1
6216129 Eldering Apr 2001 B1
6219667 Lu et al. Apr 2001 B1
6236994 Schwartz et al. May 2001 B1
6240365 Bunn May 2001 B1
6263268 Nathanson Jul 2001 B1
6285932 De Bellefeuille et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289382 Bowman-Amuah Sep 2001 B1
6295061 Park et al. Sep 2001 B1
6330499 Chou et al. Dec 2001 B1
6343302 Graham Jan 2002 B1
6353824 Boguraev et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356822 Diaz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374241 Lamburt et al. Apr 2002 B1
6397226 Sage May 2002 B1
6397336 Leppek May 2002 B2
6401103 Ho et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421733 Tso et al. Jul 2002 B1
6473849 Keller et al. Oct 2002 B1
6496855 Hunt et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505106 Lawrence et al. Jan 2003 B1
6505205 Kothuri et al. Jan 2003 B1
6519617 Wanderski et al. Feb 2003 B1
6535879 Behera Mar 2003 B1
6539370 Chang et al. Mar 2003 B1
6546216 Mizoguchi et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553373 Boguraev et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556904 Larson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6564216 Waters May 2003 B2
6571253 Thompson et al. May 2003 B1
6581061 Graham Jun 2003 B2
6583794 Wattenberg Jun 2003 B1
6594664 Estrada et al. Jul 2003 B1
6606525 Muthuswamy et al. Aug 2003 B1
6629148 Ahmed et al. Sep 2003 B1
6643663 Dabney et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654726 Hanzek Nov 2003 B1
6678706 Fishel Jan 2004 B1
6697825 Underwood et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701232 Yamaki Mar 2004 B2
6721747 Lipkin Apr 2004 B2
6728685 Ahluwalia Apr 2004 B1
6738750 Stone et al. May 2004 B2
6744735 Nakaguro Jun 2004 B1
6748305 Klausner et al. Jun 2004 B1
6785864 Te et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795819 Wheeler et al. Sep 2004 B2
6823258 Ukai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6823359 Heidingsfeld Nov 2004 B1
6826594 Pettersen Nov 2004 B1
6847988 Toyouchi et al. Jan 2005 B2
6850823 Eun et al. Feb 2005 B2
6871216 Miller et al. Mar 2005 B2
6901430 Smith Mar 2005 B1
6894601 Grunden et al. May 2005 B1
6917941 Wight et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922674 Nelson Jul 2005 B1
6941203 Chen Sep 2005 B2
6944677 Zhao Sep 2005 B1
6954731 Montague et al. Oct 2005 B1
6963854 Boyd et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965806 Eryurek et al. Nov 2005 B2
6965968 Touboul Nov 2005 B1
6978273 Bonneau et al. Dec 2005 B1
6981028 Rawat et al. Dec 2005 B1
6990629 Heaney et al. Jan 2006 B1
6993421 Pillar Jan 2006 B2
7000184 Matveyenko et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003476 Samra et al. Feb 2006 B1
7010495 Samra et al. Mar 2006 B1
7028072 Kliger et al. Apr 2006 B1
7031554 Iwane Apr 2006 B2
7039704 Davis et al. May 2006 B2
7047318 Svedloff May 2006 B1
7062343 Ogushi et al. Jun 2006 B2
7062506 Taylor et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072943 Landesmann Jul 2006 B2
7092803 Kapolka et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107268 Zawadzki et al. Sep 2006 B1
7124116 Huyler Oct 2006 B2
7152207 Underwood et al. Dec 2006 B1
7155491 Schultz et al. Dec 2006 B1
7171418 Blessin Jan 2007 B2
7184866 Squires et al. Feb 2007 B2
7197764 Cichowlas Mar 2007 B2
7219234 Ashland et al. May 2007 B1
7240125 Fleming Jul 2007 B2
7246263 Skingle Jul 2007 B2
7281029 Rawat Oct 2007 B2
7287000 Boyd et al. Oct 2007 B2
7322007 Schowtka et al. Jan 2008 B2
7386786 Davis et al. Jun 2008 B2
7401289 Lachhwani et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406429 Salonen Jul 2008 B2
7433891 Haber et al. Oct 2008 B2
7457693 Olsen et al. Nov 2008 B2
7477968 Lowrey Jan 2009 B1
7480551 Lowrey et al. Jan 2009 B1
7496543 Bamford et al. Feb 2009 B1
7502672 Kolls Mar 2009 B1
7536641 Rosenstein et al. May 2009 B2
7548985 Guigui Jun 2009 B2
7587504 Adams et al. Sep 2009 B2
7590476 Shumate Sep 2009 B2
7593925 Cadiz et al. Sep 2009 B2
7593999 Nathanson Sep 2009 B2
7613627 Doyle Nov 2009 B2
7620484 Chen Nov 2009 B1
7624342 Matveyenko et al. Nov 2009 B2
7657594 Banga et al. Feb 2010 B2
7664667 Ruppelt et al. Feb 2010 B1
7739007 Logsdon Jun 2010 B2
7747680 Ravikumar et al. Jun 2010 B2
7778841 Bayer et al. Aug 2010 B1
7801945 Geddes et al. Sep 2010 B1
7818380 Tamura et al. Oct 2010 B2
7861309 Spearman et al. Dec 2010 B2
7865409 Monaghan Jan 2011 B1
7870253 Muilenburg et al. Jan 2011 B2
7899701 Odom Mar 2011 B1
7908051 Oesterling Mar 2011 B2
7979506 Cole Jul 2011 B2
8010423 Bodin et al. Aug 2011 B2
8019501 Breed Sep 2011 B2
8036788 Breed Oct 2011 B2
8051159 Muilenburg et al. Nov 2011 B2
8055544 Ullman et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060274 Boss et al. Nov 2011 B2
8095403 Price Jan 2012 B2
8099308 Uyeki Jan 2012 B2
8135804 Uyeki Mar 2012 B2
8145379 Schwinke Mar 2012 B2
8190322 Lin et al. May 2012 B2
8209259 Graham, Jr. et al. Jun 2012 B2
8212667 Petite et al. Jul 2012 B2
8271473 Berg Sep 2012 B2
8271547 Taylor et al. Sep 2012 B2
8275717 Ullman et al. Sep 2012 B2
8285439 Hodges Oct 2012 B2
8296007 Swaminathan et al. Oct 2012 B2
8311905 Campbell et al. Nov 2012 B1
8355950 Colson et al. Jan 2013 B2
8407664 Moosmann Mar 2013 B2
8428815 Van Engelshoven et al. Apr 2013 B2
8438310 Muilenburg et al. May 2013 B2
8448057 Sugnet May 2013 B1
8521654 Ford et al. Aug 2013 B2
8538894 Ullman et al. Sep 2013 B2
8645193 Swinson et al. Feb 2014 B2
8676638 Blair et al. Mar 2014 B1
8725341 Ogasawara May 2014 B2
8745641 Coker Jun 2014 B1
8849689 Jagannathan et al. Sep 2014 B1
8886389 Edwards et al. Nov 2014 B2
8924071 Stanek et al. Dec 2014 B2
8954222 Costantino Feb 2015 B2
8996230 Lorenz et al. Mar 2015 B2
8996235 Singh et al. Mar 2015 B2
9014908 Chen et al. Apr 2015 B2
9015059 Sims et al. Apr 2015 B2
9026304 Olsen, III et al. May 2015 B2
9047722 Kurnik et al. Jun 2015 B2
9165413 Jones et al. Oct 2015 B2
9183681 Fish Nov 2015 B2
9325650 Yalavarty et al. Apr 2016 B2
9349223 Palmer May 2016 B1
9384597 Koch et al. Jul 2016 B2
9477936 Lawson et al. Oct 2016 B2
9577866 Rogers et al. Feb 2017 B2
9596287 Rybak et al. Mar 2017 B2
9619945 Adderly et al. Apr 2017 B2
9659495 Modica et al. May 2017 B2
9706008 Rajan et al. Jul 2017 B2
9715665 Schondorf et al. Jul 2017 B2
9754304 Taira et al. Sep 2017 B2
9778045 Bang Oct 2017 B2
9836714 Lander et al. Dec 2017 B2
10032139 Adderly et al. Jul 2018 B2
10083411 Kinsey et al. Sep 2018 B2
10169607 Sheth et al. Jan 2019 B1
10229394 Davis et al. Mar 2019 B1
10448120 Bursztyn et al. Oct 2019 B1
10475256 Chowdhury et al. Nov 2019 B2
10552871 Chadwick Feb 2020 B1
11117253 Oleynik Sep 2021 B2
20010005831 Lewin et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010014868 Herz et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010037332 Miller et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039594 Park et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010054049 Maeda et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020023111 Arora et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020024537 Jones et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026359 Long et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032626 Dewolf et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020032701 Gao et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042738 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020046245 Hillar et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049831 Platner et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052778 Murphy et al. May 2002 A1
20020059260 Jas May 2002 A1
20020065698 Schick et al. May 2002 A1
20020065739 Florance et al. May 2002 A1
20020069110 Sonnenberg Jun 2002 A1
20020073080 Lipkin Jun 2002 A1
20020082978 Ghouri et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091755 Narin Jul 2002 A1
20020107739 Schlee Aug 2002 A1
20020111727 Vanstory et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111844 Vanstory et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020116418 Lachhwani et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020123359 Wei et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020124053 Adams et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129054 Ferguson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133273 Lowrey et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138331 Hosea et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143646 Boyden et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020154146 Rodriquez et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169851 Weathersby et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173885 Lowrey et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188869 Patrick Dec 2002 A1
20020196273 Krause Dec 2002 A1
20020198761 Ryan et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020198878 Baxter et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030014443 Bernstein et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023632 Ries et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030033378 Needham et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036832 Kokes et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036964 Boyden et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037263 Kamat et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046179 Anabtawi et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030051022 Sogabe et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030055666 Roddy et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061263 Riddle Mar 2003 A1
20030065532 Takaoka Apr 2003 A1
20030065583 Takaoka Apr 2003 A1
20030069785 Lohse Apr 2003 A1
20030069790 Kane Apr 2003 A1
20030074392 Campbell et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030095038 Dix May 2003 A1
20030101262 Godwin May 2003 A1
20030115292 Griffin et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030120502 Robb et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030145310 Thames et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030177050 Crampton et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177175 Worley et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030225853 Wang et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229623 Chang et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233246 Snapp et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040012631 Skorski Jan 2004 A1
20040039646 Hacker Feb 2004 A1
20040041818 White et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073546 Forster et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040073564 Haber et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088228 Mercer et al. May 2004 A1
20040093243 Bodin et al. May 2004 A1
20040117046 Colle et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040122735 Meshkin et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128320 Grove et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040139203 Graham, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148342 Cotte Jul 2004 A1
20040156020 Edwards Aug 2004 A1
20040163047 Nagahara et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040181464 Vanker et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199413 Hauser et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220863 Porter et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225664 Casement Nov 2004 A1
20040230897 Latzel Nov 2004 A1
20040255233 Croney et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267263 May Dec 2004 A1
20040268225 Walsh et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268232 Tunning Dec 2004 A1
20050015491 Koeppel Jan 2005 A1
20050021197 Zimmerman et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027611 Wharton Feb 2005 A1
20050065804 Worsham et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050096963 Myr et al. May 2005 A1
20050108112 Ellenson et al. May 2005 A1
20050114270 Hind et al. May 2005 A1
20050114764 Gudenkauf et al. May 2005 A1
20050108637 Sahota et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050149398 McKay Jul 2005 A1
20050171836 Leacy Aug 2005 A1
20050176482 Raisinghani et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187834 Painter et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198121 Daniels et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050228736 Norman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050256755 Chand et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267774 Merritt et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050268282 Laird Dec 2005 A1
20050289020 Bruns et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289599 Matsuura et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060031811 Ernst et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060059253 Goodman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064637 Rechterman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060123330 Horiuchi et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129423 Sheinson et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129982 Doyle Jun 2006 A1
20060136105 Larson Jun 2006 A1
20060161841 Horiuchi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060200751 Underwood et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224447 Koningstein Oct 2006 A1
20060248442 Rosenstein et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265355 Taylor Nov 2006 A1
20060271844 Suklikar Nov 2006 A1
20060277588 Harrington et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282328 Gerace et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005446 Fusz et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016486 Stone et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027754 Collins et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070033087 Combs et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070033520 Kimzey et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070053513 Hoffberg Mar 2007 A1
20070100519 Engel May 2007 A1
20070150368 Arora et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070209011 Padmanabhuni et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226540 Konieczny Sep 2007 A1
20070250229 Wu Oct 2007 A1
20070250327 Hedy Oct 2007 A1
20070250840 Coker et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070271154 Broudy et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271330 Mattox et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271389 Joshi et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282711 Ullman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282712 Ullman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070282713 Ullman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288413 Mizuno et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070294192 Tellersen Dec 2007 A1
20080010561 Bay Jan 2008 A1
20080015921 Libman Jan 2008 A1
20080015929 Koeppel et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027827 Eglen et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080119983 Inbarajan et al. May 2008 A1
20080172632 Stambaugh Jul 2008 A1
20080189143 Wurster Aug 2008 A1
20080195435 Bentley et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080195932 Oikawa et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201163 Barker et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080255925 Vailaya et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090012887 Taub et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024918 Silverbrook et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090043780 Hentrich, Jr. et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070435 Abhyanker Mar 2009 A1
20090089134 Uyeki Apr 2009 A1
20090106036 Tamura et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112687 Blair et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090138329 Wanker May 2009 A1
20090182232 Zhang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187513 Noy et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187939 Lajoie Jul 2009 A1
20090198507 Rhodus Aug 2009 A1
20090204454 Lagudi Aug 2009 A1
20090204655 Wendelberger Aug 2009 A1
20090222532 Finlaw Sep 2009 A1
20090265607 Raz et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090313035 Esser et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100011415 Cortes Jan 2010 A1
20100023393 Costy et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100070343 Taira et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082778 Muilenburg et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100082780 Muilenburg et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100088158 Pollack Apr 2010 A1
20100100259 Geiter Apr 2010 A1
20100100506 Marot Apr 2010 A1
20100131363 Sievert et al. May 2010 A1
20100235219 Merrick et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100235231 Jewer Sep 2010 A1
20100293030 Wu Nov 2010 A1
20100312608 Shan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318408 Sankaran et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100324777 Tominaga et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110010432 Uyeki Jan 2011 A1
20110015989 Tidwell et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110022525 Swinson et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110082804 Swinson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110145064 Anderson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110161167 Jallapuram Jun 2011 A1
20110191264 Inghelbrecht et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196762 Dupont Aug 2011 A1
20110224864 Gellatly et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110231055 Knight et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110288937 Manoogian, III Nov 2011 A1
20110307296 Hall et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110307411 Bolivar et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120066010 Williams Mar 2012 A1
20120089474 Xiao et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120095804 Calabrese et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120116868 Chin et al. May 2012 A1
20120158211 Chen et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120209714 Douglas et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221125 Bell Aug 2012 A1
20120268294 Michaelis Oct 2012 A1
20120278886 Luna Nov 2012 A1
20120284113 Pollak Nov 2012 A1
20120316981 Hoover et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130046432 Edwards et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130080196 Schroeder et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130080305 Virag Mar 2013 A1
20130151334 Berkhin et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130191445 Gayman et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130204484 Ricci Aug 2013 A1
20130226699 Long Aug 2013 A1
20130325541 Capriotti et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130332023 Bertosa et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140012659 Yan Jan 2014 A1
20140026037 Garb et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140088866 Knapp et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140094992 Lambert et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140122178 Knight May 2014 A1
20140136278 Carvalho May 2014 A1
20140229391 East et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140244110 Tharaldson et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140277906 Lowrey et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140278805 Thompson Sep 2014 A1
20140324275 Stanek et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324536 Cotton Oct 2014 A1
20140331301 Subramani et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140337163 Whisnant Nov 2014 A1
20140379530 Kim et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150057875 McGinnis et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150066781 Johnson et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150066933 Kolodziej et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150100199 Kurnik et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150142256 Jones May 2015 A1
20150227894 Mapes, Jr. Aug 2015 A1
20150268059 Borghesani et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150278886 Fusz Oct 2015 A1
20150286979 Ming et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150334165 Arling et al. Nov 2015 A1
20160004516 Ivanov Jan 2016 A1
20160059412 Oleynik Mar 2016 A1
20160071054 Kakarala et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160092944 Taylor et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160132935 Shen et al. May 2016 A1
20160140609 Demir May 2016 A1
20160140620 Pinkowish et al. May 2016 A1
20160140622 Wang et al. May 2016 A1
20160148439 Akselrod et al. May 2016 A1
20160180358 Battista Jun 2016 A1
20160180378 Toshida et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160180418 Jaeger Jun 2016 A1
20160267503 Zakai-Or et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160275533 Smith et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160307174 Marcelle et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160357599 Glatfelter Dec 2016 A1
20170034547 Jain et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170039785 Richter et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170053460 Hauser et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170064038 Chen Mar 2017 A1
20170124525 Johnson et al. May 2017 A1
20170262894 Kirti et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170293894 Taliwal et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170308844 Kelley Oct 2017 A1
20170308864 Kelley Oct 2017 A1
20170308865 Kelley Oct 2017 A1
20170316459 Strauss et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170337573 Toprak Nov 2017 A1
20170352054 Ma et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180095733 Torman et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180225710 Kar et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180232749 Moore, Jr. et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180285901 Zackrone Oct 2018 A1
20180285925 Zackrone Oct 2018 A1
20190334884 Ross et al. Oct 2019 A1
20210287106 Jerram Sep 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2494350 May 2004 CA
0461888 Mar 1995 EP
2007002759 Jan 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (179)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Final Office Action, dated Feb. 27, 2020, 18 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042, Final Office Action, dated Mar. 19, 2020, 35 pages.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050528073821/http://www.kbb.com/, 1 pg.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050531000823/http://www.carfax.com/, 1 pg.
IBM Tivoli Access Manager Base Administration Guide, Version 5.1. 2003, International Business Machines Corporation. Entire book enclosed and cited. 402 pgs.
Interconnection. (2003). In Roget's II The New Thesaurus. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved Jul. 16, 2009, from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/hmrogets/interconnection, 1 pg.
Internet Archive Dan Gillmor Sep. 1, 1996.
Internet Archive Wayback Machine, archive of LDAP Browser.com—FAQ. Archived Dec. 11, 2000. Available at <http://web.archive.org/web/200012110152/http://www.ldapbrowser.com/faq/faq.php3?sID=fe4ae66f023d86909f35e974f3a1ce>.
Internet Archive Wayback Machine, archive of LDAP Browser.com—Product Info. Archived Dec. 11, 2000. Available at <http://web.archive.org/web/200012110541/http://www.ldapbrowser.com/prodinfo/prodinfo.php3?sID=fe4ae66f2fo23d86909f35e974f3a1ce>.
Internet Archive: Audio Archive, http://www.archive.org/audio/audio-searchresults.php?search=@start=0&limit=100&sort=ad, printed May 12, 2004, 12 pgs.
Internet Archive: Democracy Now, http://www.archive.org/audio/collection.php?collection=democracy_now, printed May 12, 2004, 2 pgs.
Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) Overview, printed Mar. 6, 2010, 3 pgs.
Java version history—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, printed Mar. 6, 2010, 9 pgs.
Lee, Adam J. et al., “Searching for Open Windows and Unlocked Doors: Port Scanning in Large-Scale Commodity Clusters,” Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2005. CCGrid 2005. IEEE International Symposium on vol. 1; Publication Year: 2005.
Michener, J.R., et al., “Managing System and Active-Content Integrity,” Computer; vol. 33, Issue: 7; Publication Year: 2000, pp. 108-110.
Milic-Frayling, Natasa, et al., “SmartView: Enhanced Document Viewer for Mobile Devices,” Google Nov. 15, 2002, 11 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 26, 2008, 13 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 6, 2006, 11 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 22, 2009, 22 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 29, 2006, 11 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 12, 2007, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 29, 2008, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 1, 2010, 19 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,796, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated May 19, 2005, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 17, 2007, 12 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 9, 2005, 14 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 22, 2004, 10 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,465, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 27, 2004, 9 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,606, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 19, 2005, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,606, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated May 17, 2004, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 30, 2010, 23 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 13, 2008, 11 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 14, 2009, 14 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 17, 2007, 11 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 13, 2008, 14 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 6, 2009, 6 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,939, filed May 1, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 19, 2010, 7 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,939, filed May 1, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 9, 2010, 11 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 1, 2011, 23 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 12, 2009, 19 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 3, 2008, 14 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 1, 2011, 15 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 27, 2009, 14 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 11, 2009, 20 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 14, 2011, 19 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 10, 2011, 18 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 16, 2009, 20 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 16, 2013, 5 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 17, 2011, 8 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,855, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 14, 2010, 6 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,861, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 8, 2010, 8 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 22, 2016, 16 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 5, 2013, 15 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 6, 2017, 17 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 18, 2014, 15 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 30, 2016, 23 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 20, 2017.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 21, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, filed Apr. 21, 2016, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 30, 2019, 26 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,820, filed Apr. 21, 2016, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 23, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, filed May 23, 2017, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 3, 2018.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019.
Non-Final Office Action received in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, filed Apr. 21, 2016, mailed by United States Patent and Trademark Office dated Jan. 30, 2019, 26 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 7, 2012, 15 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,796, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 1, 2006, 5 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 14, 2008, 6 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,465, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 21, 2005, 4 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,606, filed Jan. 24, 2003 and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 4, 2006, 8 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 16, 2009, 7 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/414,939, filed May 1, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 2, 2010, pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 30, 2012, 6 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 9, 2011, 10 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 6, 2013, 22 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 23, 2012, 19 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 27, 2013, 6 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,855, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 22, 2010, 8 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,855, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 28, 2010, 5 pgs.
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,861, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 6, 2011, 10 pgs.
Notice of Non-compliant Amendment dated Dec. 12, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810.
Permissions in the Java™ 2 SDK, printed Mar. 6, 2010, 45 pgs.
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 7, 2010.
Strebe, Matthew et al. MCSE: NT Server 4 Study Guide, Third Edition. 2000, Sybex Inc. Front matter, pp. 284-293, and 308-347 are included Entire book cited, 36 pgs.
Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 19, 2013, 3 pgs.
Trademark Application, U.S. Appl. No. 76/375,405. 13 pages of advertising material and other application papers enclosed. Available from Trademark Document Retrieval system.
Trademark Electronic Search System record for U.S. Appl. No. 76/375,405, Word Mark “NITRA”.
“XTimes Newsletter”, vol. 7, 2013, 4 pages.
“An Appointment with Destiny—The Time for Web-Enabled Scheduling has Arrived”, Link Fall, 2007, 2 pages.
“How a Solution found a Problem of Scheduling Service Appointments”, Automotive News, 2016, 4 pages.
“Openbay Announces First-of-its-Kind Connected Car Repair Service”, openbay.com, Mar. 31, 2015, 14 pages.
“Service Advisor”, Automotive Dealership Institute, 2007, 26 pages.
“XTime.com Web Pages”, Jan. 8, 2015, 1 page.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, Advisory Action, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 6 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 26, 2019, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Advisory Action, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 6 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Final Office Action, dated May 17, 2019, 25 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779, Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2019, 27 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2019, 26 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793, Non-Final Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2019, 31 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,820, Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 28, 2019, 7 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042, Non-Final Office Action, dated Oct. 10, 2019, 26 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048, Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 30, 2019, 30 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 18, 2019, 6 pages.
Bedell, Dallas Morning News, “I Know Someone Who Knows Kevin Bacon”. Oct. 27, 1998. 4 pgs.
Chatterjee, et al., “On-board diagnostics not just for racing anymore”, EDN.com, May 6, 2013, 7 pages.
Croswell, “Service Shop Optimiztion”, Modern Tire Retailer, May 21, 2013, 7 pages.
Drawbaugh, “Automatic Link Review: an expensive way to learn better driving habits”, Endgadget.com, Nov. 26, 2013, 14 pages.
Emmanuel, “Basics to Creating an Appointment System for Automotive Service Customers”, Automotiveservicemanagement.com, 2006, 9 pages.
Jenkins, “Real-time vehicle performance monitoring with data intergrity”, A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University, Oct. 2006, 57 pages.
Lavrinc, “First Android-powered infotainment system coming to 2012 Saab 9-3”, Autoblog.com, Mar. 2, 2011, 8 pages.
Needham, “Google Now Taking Appointments for Auto Repair Shops”, Autoshopsolutions.com, Aug. 25, 2015, 6 pages.
openbay.com Web Pages, Openbay.com, retrieved from archive.org May 14, 2019, Apr. 2015, 6 pages.
openbay.com Web Pages, Openbay.com, retrieved from archive.org on May 14, 2019, Feb. 2014, 2 pages.
openbay.com Web Pages, Openbay.com, retrieved from archive.org, May 14, 2019, Mar. 2015, 11 pages.
Phelan, “Smart phone app aims to automate car repairs”, Detroit Free Press Auto Critic, Mar. 31, 2015, 2 pages.
Pubnub Staff, “Streaming Vehicle Data in Realtime with Automatic (Pt 1)”, Pubnub.com, Aug. 17, 2015, 13 pages.
Warren, “This Device Determines What Ails Your Car and Finds a Repair Shop—Automatically”, CarAndDriver.com, Apr. 8, 2015, 7 pages.
You, et al., “Overview of Remote Diagnosis and Maintenance for Automotive Systems”, 2005 SAE World Congress, Apr. 11-14, 2015, 10 pages.
“NetFormx Offers Advanced Network Discovery Software”. PR Newswire. Mar. 15, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-54102907.html>.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 12, 2018.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, filed May 23, 2017, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 31, 2019, 3 pgs.
Aloisio, Giovanni et al., “Web-based access to the Grid using the Grid Resource Broker portal,” Google 2002, pp. 1145-1160.
Anonymous, “Software ready for prime time.” Automotive News. Detroit, Nov. 5, 2001. vol. 76, Issue 5996, p. 28.
Chadwick, D. W., “Understanding X.500—The Directory.” Available at <http://sec.cs.kent.ac.uk/x500book/>. 1996. Entire work cited.
Chen, Deren, “Business to Business Standard and Supply Chain System Framework in Virtual Enterprises,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, The Sixth International Conference on, 2001; Publication Year: 2001, pp. 472-476.
CNY Business Journal, “Frank La Voila named Southern Tier Small-Business Person of 1999”. Jun. 11, 1999. 2 pgs.
Davis, Peter T. et al., “Sams Teach Yourself Microsoft Windows NT Server 4 in 21 Days,” Sams® Publishing, © 1999. ISBN: 0-672-31555-6, 15 pgs., printed Dec. 21, 2008.
Derfler, Frank J. et al., “How Networks Work: Millennium Edition,” Que, A Division of Macmillan Computer Publishing, © 2000. ISBN: 0-7897-2445-6, 9 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 6, 2011, 26 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,795, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 3, 2010, 24 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 5, 2005, 12 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 18, 2006, 15 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/350,810, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 14, 2007, 13 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,465, filed Jan. 24, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 5, 2005, 8 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 24, 2010, 22 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 7, 2008, 11 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated Mar. 8, 2011, 21 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/665,899, filed Sep. 18, 2003, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 11, 2009, 14 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/149,909, filed Jun. 10, 2005, and mailed from the USPTO dated Feb. 4, 2009, 14 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 7, 2009, 19 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated May 21, 2010, 28 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/442,821, filed May 30, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 29, 2011, 26 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/446,011, filed Jun. 2, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 8, 2010, 12 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 27, 2010, 13 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/524,602, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 26, 2012, 11 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/525,009, filed Sep. 21, 2006, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 3, 2010,16 pgs.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305055408/http://www.dealerclick.com/, 1 pg.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,852, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Oct. 24, 2011, 13 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,861, filed Oct. 1, 2008, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jun. 22, 2011, 5 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Aug. 28, 2015, 25 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 20, 2016, 16 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jul. 13, 2018, 11 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 10, 2011, and mailed from the USPTO dated Sep. 12, 2013, 13 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/025,019, filed Feb. 20, 2011 and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 20, 2016, 16 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Jan. 11, 2019 , 16 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Apr. 16, 2018.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, filed Mar. 13, 2014, and mailed from the USPTO dated Dec. 6, 2016, 26 pgs.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/602,999, filed May 23, 2017, and mailed from the USPTO dated Nov. 21, 2018.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,820.
Hogue et al., “Thresher: Automating the Unwrapping of Semantic Content from the World Wide Web,” ACM 2005, pp. 86-95.
Housel, Barron C. et al., “WebExpress: A client/intercept based system for optimizing Web browsing in a wireless environment,” Google 1998, pp. 419-431.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010718130244/http://chromedata.com/maing2/about/index.asp, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793 , Final Office Action, dated Mar. 27, 2020, 22 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042 , Non-Final Office Action, dated Aug. 4, 2020, 42 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048 , Final Office Action, dated Apr. 9, 2020, 42 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,779 , Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 9, 2020, 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042 , Non-Final Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2020, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048, et al., Non-Final Office Action ,dated Mar. 8, 2021 ,69 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/951,833, et al., Non-Final Office Action ,dated Feb. 4, 2021 ,10 pages.
Clemens Grelck, et al.,“A Multithread Compiler Backend for High-Level Array Programming”,2003.
Open Bank Project, et al., https://www.openbankproject.com/, retrieved Nov. 23, 2020 ,10 pages.
Standards for Technology in Auto, et al., https://www.starstandard.org/, retrieved Nov. 23, 2020, 4 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/951,833 , Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 16, 2021, 14 pages.
Hu, Bo , “A Platform based Distributed Service Framework for Large-scale Cloud Ecosystem Development”, IEEE Computer Society, 2015, 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/208,042, et al., Notice of Allowance ,dated May 6, 2021 ,13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,042, et al., Final Office Action ,dated May 5, 2021 ,38 pages.
Johns,Pamela et al.,“Competitive intelligence in service marketing, Marketing Intelligence & Planning”, vol. 28, No. 5 ,2010 ,pp. 551-570.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/134,793 , Notice of Allowance, dated Nov. 2, 2020, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/478,048, Final Office Action, dated Sep. 17, 2021, 32 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/911,154, Non-Final Office Action, dated Sep. 16, 2021, 15 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190297162 A1 Sep 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62646199 Mar 2018 US