Modern computer operating systems include one or more file system components. Such components are responsible for storing, organizing, updating, and retrieving data for normal application programs in a manner that is largely transparent to the user of the computer applications running on a computer system employing such an operating system. The specific features supported by these file systems can vary dramatically, both in terms of their model of organization, the manner in which they communicate with their underlying storage, and the specific features they make available to application programs, and thus, ultimately, to the users of those application programs.
Some file systems support specialized data transformation features, such as encryption, compression, storage of multiple disjoint data attributes (such as streams, resource forks, property lists, extended attributes, etc.), transactional support, localized language support, etc. However, these features are characteristics of the specific file system, and different machines in a computer system may use different file systems. Accordingly, applications running on the computer system are unable to take advantage of these specialized features unless all components of the computer system use the same file system. Applications may individually support such features by incorporating their own unique features but this technique does not make the features available to existing applications, limiting overall usefulness.
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, embodiments of methods for organizing data are disclosed. The methods may comprise the step of receiving a write request comprising a data unit. The methods may also comprise the steps of organizing the data unit into a sub-file and incorporating the sub-file into a data file according to a log-structured organization system. In addition, the methods may comprise the step of writing the data file to a data storage according to a second organization system.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, embodiments of a system for organizing data are disclosed. The system may comprise an application, a data storage, and a data transformation module. The data transformation module may be configured to receive a write request from the application. The write request may comprise a data unit. The data transformation module may also be configured to organize the data unit into a sub-file and incorporate the sub-file into a file according to a log-structured organization system. In addition, the data transformation module may be configured to forward the file to the data storage.
Various embodiments of the present invention may be employed to perform arbitrary data transformations. As used herein, the term “data unit” refers to a group of related data. As used herein, the term “data file” refers to an organizational unit of data. For example, a data file may include one or more data units. In various non-limiting embodiments, a data file may be an application data file, a database record or a file containing some or all of an executable image, such as an application program, code library, device driver, operating system image file, etc. As used herein, the term “sub-file” refers to an organizational unit of data organized within a data file. For example, a sub-file may include one or more data units.
The system architecture 200 may include one or more examples of an application 202, a library 204, an operating system 206, a file system 208, data storage 210 and a data cache 212. The various components of the architecture may facilitate the transfer of data between data storage 210 and the application 202. The architecture 200, in various embodiments, may be implemented on one or more of computing devices 102, 104, 106, 108. It will be appreciated that instances of some components of the architecture 200 such as, for example, the operating system 206, may occur on more than one of the computing devices 102, 104, 106, 108. Other components such as, for example, data storage 210 may be implemented across multiple components 102, 104, 106, 108 of the computer system 100.
The application 202 may include a group of one or more software components executed by a processor or processors of one or more of the devices 102, 104, 106, 108. The application 202 may perform at least one useful task such as, for example, providing e-mail service, providing word processing, providing financial management services, etc. The application 202 may perform tasks by manipulating data. To acquire data for manipulation and output results, the application 202 may create “read requests” and “write requests” for particular data units. These requests may be handled by other components of the architecture 202 as described in more detail below. It will be appreciated that the architecture 200 may, in various aspects, include additional applications (not shown).
Data utilized by the application 202 may be stored at data storage 210. Data storage 210 may include any kind of storage drive capable of storing data in an electronic or other suitable computer-readable format. In certain non-limiting embodiments, data storage 210 may include a single fixed disk drive, an array of disk drives, an array of disk drives combined to provide the appearance of a larger, single disk drive, a solid state drive, etc. Data storage 210 may be physically located at any device 102, 104, 106, 108 of the computer system 100. For example, data storage 210 may include various drives accessible over the network 110. In various embodiments, all or a part of data storage 210 may be located at server 102 and may be accessed by the other components 104, 106, 108 of the computer system 100 through network 110.
File system 208 may be an organization system for logically and physically organizing data present at the data storage 210. In various non-limiting embodiments, the file system 208 may be a native file system included with the operating system 206, described below, or a third party file system. The file system 208 may organize data units into data files, and manage the location of data files in data storage 210. Each data file may include one or more data units. The file system 208 may be, for example, specific to a computer device 102, 104, 106, 108, or to particular drives making up data storage 210. In various embodiments, a single file system 208 may manage associations between data files and physical locations for data storage 210 located across the computer system 100. The file system 208 may be any suitable file system including, as non-limiting examples, File Allocation Table 16 (FAT16), File Allocation Table 32 (FAT32), NTFS, High Performance File System (HPFS), UNIX file system (UFS), XFS, journaled file system (JFS), Universal Data Format File System (UDFS), CD-ROM File System (CDFS), Enhanced File System (EFS), SGI XFS, Clustered XFS (CXFS), HFS, VxFS, Raw File System (RawFS), Local File System (DCE/LFS), etc.
Interaction between the application 202 and the data storage 210 may be facilitated by the operating system 206. The operating system 206 may be any suitable operating system. For example, in various non-limiting embodiments, the operating system 206 may be any version of MICROSOFT WINDOWS, any UNIX operating system, any Linux operating system, OS/2, any version of Mac OS, etc. Each computer device 102, 104, 106, 108 may run its own instance of an operating system 206. The devices 102, 104, 106, 108 of the computer system 100 may in various embodiments run the same type of operating system 206 or different types.
The operating system 206 may provide services to the application 202 that facilitate the application's 202 functions. For example, the operating system 206 may allow the application 202 to access and manipulate data units stored at data storage 210. The operating system 206 may service read or write requests from the application 202, for example, by accessing local or remote data storage 210 through the file system 208. In various embodiments, a library 204 such as, for example, an Application Program Interface (API) library, may be provided at a logical position between the application 202 and the operating system 206. The library 204 may facilitate requests from the application 202 to the operating system 206.
The architecture 200 may also include data cache 212. Data cache 212 may be a location where data or data units may be stored for quick retrieval. In various embodiments, data cache 212 may include dedicated physical memory, for example, associated with a processor or processors of one of the computer devices 102, 104, 106, 108. In other non-limiting embodiments, data cache 212 may include “virtual” cache, e.g. locations in system memory that are considered to be data cache 212.
Data cache 212 may be used as a data buffer to minimize potentially time-consuming instances of accessing data storage 210. For example, the operating system 206 may store data units that have been recently accessed by application 202, or are expected to be accessed by the application 202, in data cache 212. This may be referred to as “read ahead.” Also, the operating system 206 may store data units modified by the application 202 in data cache 212, only writing the data units to data storage 210 at certain intervals. This may be referred to as “write behind.” In write behind, data units stored in data cache 212 may be written to data storage 210, for example, when the amount of data to be written exceeds a threshold size.
The data transformation module 302 may facilitate transformations of data by manipulating the data's file structure. In various embodiments, the data transformation module 302 may organize data files of the file system 208 to include a series of sub-files. In a MICROSOFT WINDOWS environment, this concept may be called a “file system filter driver;” in a UNIX/Linux environment, it may be called a “layered” or “stackable” file system; and in MICROSOFT DISK OPERATING SYSTEM (MS-DOS), it may be called an INT21 or INT13 driver. The data transformation module 302 may organize sub-files within a data file according to any suitable organization system or file system. In one non-limiting embodiment, the data transformation module 302 may organize the sub-files according to a log-structured organization system, or file system.
It will be appreciated that organizing sub-files 410 within the data file 402 according to a log-structured organization system may present certain advantages related to data transformation. For example, log-structured organization systems may more easily facilitate data transformations that arbitrarily change the size of a data unit. This is because, in various embodiments, according to a log-structured organization system, when a sub-file 410 is modified, it is written to the next available data block 406 and not to the data block 406 where the sub-file 410 was located before it was modified. Accordingly, log-structured organization systems may more easily handle fluctuations in the size of sub-files 410. Non-limiting examples of arbitrary size-altering data transformations include, for example, transformations to decrease the level of redundancy present within the data file 402, (e.g., compression), transformations to protect the data from being usable without appropriate authorization, (e.g., encryption), translations from a first language to a second language, (e.g., English to Chinese), transformation from a first data format or encoding to a second data format or encoding, (e.g. ASCII data to UNICODE data), etc.
In addition, a log-structured organization system may facilitate the provision of specialized file structure support not present in the underlying file system 208 including, for example, streams, property lists, extended attributes, reparse points, symbolic links, hard links, property lists, resource forks, sparce data regions, etc. For example, a log-structured organization system may facilitate the inclusion of multiple data units with a single sub-file 410 regardless of whether the underlying file system 208 supports this feature. For example, if two data units are associated with a single sub-file 410, then the log 404 may simply be updated to reflect the data blocks 406 corresponding to both data units. This feature may be useful in a number of settings. For example, when a data unit is encrypted, an encryption header may be associated with the same sub-file 410 as the data unit. Also, a data unit including an image may be associated with a second data unit including a thumbnail of the image. In various non-limiting embodiments, any kind of metadata and/or other supplemental data may be associated with a data unit including, for example, a checksum, information indexing the data unit, a translation of the data into a second language, a digital signature authenticating the data unit, etc.
Also, in various embodiments, a data transformation module 302 implementing a log-structured organization or file system may be used to keep previous copies of data units that have been deleted or changed, for example, documents, e-mails, etc. When an application 202 modifies the data unit contained in a sub-file 410, the sub-file 410 may be extracted from the data file 402, modified, and then re-written to the data file 402. According to a log-structured organization system, the sub-file 410 may not be re-written to the previous location or data block 406 from which it was extracted. Instead, the sub-file 410 may be written to a new data location, e.g., a new data block 406. The previous location, however, may not be physically erased and may still store the un-modified version of the sub-file 410. Therefore, records of previous versions of the data unit stored at a sub-file 410 may be maintained by tracking the previous locations of the sub-file 410 within the data file 402. The previous locations of a sub-file 410 may be tracked, for example, by creating additional entries in the log 404 pointing to the data block or blocks 406 corresponding to the previous locations. This functionality may be useful, for example, to comply with regulatory requirements.
It will be appreciated that implementing the log-structured file system within a data file 402 may, for example, provide, a highly flexible method for adding functionality to an existing file system or file systems in an operating system so that such features can be made generally available to all applications without requiring any modifications to the applications.
The data transformation module 302 may compress the data unit at step 506 according to any suitable compression scheme. Non-limiting examples of compression schemes that may be used by the data transformation module 302 include lossless compression schemes such as the Lempel-Ziv-Welch dictionary based compression technique, run-length encoding schemes, etc., as well as lossy compression schemes, such as the Joint Photographic Experts Group scheme (JPEG), a Moving Pictures Experts Group scheme (MPEG), etc. It will be appreciated that it may be advantageous for the data transformation module 302 to compress the data unit at step 506 before encryption because the results of many encryption algorithms are highly random, making subsequent compression difficult.
At step 508, the data transformation module 302 may encrypt the data according to any suitable encryption scheme, algorithm, or device including, for example, DES schemes, schemes based on the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Data Encryption Standard, schemes based on the Advanced Encryption Standard, and/or other schemes, such as the Lucifer encryption scheme from IBM, public key encryption schemes, etc. In various embodiments, the data transformation module 302 may utilize encryption hardware 304 to encrypt and decrypt data.
It will be appreciated that in various non-limiting embodiments, the data transformation module 302 may perform various other data transformations in addition to, or instead of, the compression and encryption described with reference to process flow 500. For one non-limiting example, the data transformation module 302 may perform any kind of data transformation, including data transformations that tend to change the original size of a data unit. Additional non-limiting examples of data transformations that may be performed by the data transformation module 302 include translation from a first language to a second language, (e.g., English to French), transformation from a first data format to a second data format, (e.g., ASCII data to UNICODE data), the addition of a digital signature, provisions for supporting sparse files, allowing support for extended attributes, property lists, alternate data streams, transactions, etc.
At step 510, the data transformation module 302 may format the data unit into a sub-file 410 and at step 512, may incorporate the sub-file 410 into the data file 402. For example, the data transformation module 302 may write the sub-file to the next available data block 406 of the data file 402 and update the log 404 to associate the sub-file 410 with the data block 406 where it is located. The data file 402 itself may then be stored at data storage 210, for example, through the file system 208 at step 514. It will be appreciated that if a write-behind method is in use, the data file 402 may be written to data cache 212 instead of being immediately written to data storage 210. Data files including data file 402 may then be written to data storage 210 according to the write-behind method.
When it has received the data file 402, the data transformation module 302 may extract the sub-file 410 including the data unit originally requested by the application 202 at step 602. Extracting the sub-file 410 may include referring to the log 404 of the data file 402 to find the data block or blocks 406 including the sub-file 410 and extracting the sub-file 410 from the appropriate data block or blocks 406. When the sub-file 410 is extracted, the data transformation module 302 may decrypt the included data unit at 612 and decompress the data unit at 614. The data unit may then be forwarded to the application 202, for example, through the operating system 206.
In various embodiments, the functionality of the data transformation module 302 may be implemented at any point of the architectures 200, 300 between the application 202 and the data storage 210. It will be appreciated that the steps of the process flows 500 and 600 may be modified accordingly. For example,
In various embodiments, files 402 including sub-files 410 may be copied and/or transmitted freely by computer devices 102, 104, 106, 108 regardless of whether the computer devices implement a data transformation module 302 or similar functionality. Computer devices 102, 104, 106, 108 without a data transformation module 302 or similar functionality, however, may not be able to read the files 402 and/or access the data units stored in sub-files 410.
It will be appreciated that transferability of files 402 including sub-files 410 may be exploited for various purposes. For example, it may be exploited to configure permissions to access data units within the computer system 100. Server 102 of the computer system 100 may include files 402 containing sub-files 410 according to the present disclosure. In various embodiments, the files 402 may be freely copied and transferred among the devices 102, 104, 106, 108, however, only devices 102, 104, 106, 108 implementing the functionality of the data transformation module 302 may be given the capability to access the sub-files 410 and included data units.
It is to be understood that the figures and descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been simplified to illustrate elements that are relevant for a clear understanding of the present invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other elements, such as, for example, details of system architecture. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that these and other elements may be desirable for practice of various aspects of the present embodiments. However, because such elements are well known in the art, and because they do not facilitate a better understanding of the present invention, a discussion of such elements is not provided herein.
It can be appreciated that, in some embodiments of the present methods and systems disclosed herein, a single component can be replaced by multiple components, and multiple components replaced by a single component, to perform a given function or functions. Except where such substitution would not be operative to practice the present methods and systems, such substitution is within the scope of the present invention. Examples presented herein, including operational examples, are intended to illustrate potential implementations of the present method and system embodiments. It can be appreciated that such examples are intended primarily for purposes of illustration. No particular aspect or aspects of the example method, product, computer-readable media, and/or system embodiments described herein are intended to limit the scope of the present invention.
It should be appreciated that figures presented herein are intended for illustrative purposes and are not intended as design drawings. Omitted details and modifications or alternative embodiments are within the purview of persons of ordinary skill in the art. Furthermore, whereas particular embodiments of the invention have been described herein for the purpose of illustrating the invention and not for the purpose of limiting the same, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous variations of the details, materials and arrangement of parts/elements/steps/functions may be made within the principle and scope of the invention without departing from the invention as described in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/145,433, filed on Jun. 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4135240 | Ritchie | Jan 1979 | A |
4959811 | Szczepanek | Sep 1990 | A |
4984153 | Kregness et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5027395 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5488701 | Brady et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506983 | Atkinson et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530850 | Ford et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537588 | Engelmann et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5551003 | Mattson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560008 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5574898 | Leblang et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5606983 | Monty et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5652879 | Harris et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664178 | Sinofsky | Sep 1997 | A |
5706504 | Atkinson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715441 | Atkinson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734861 | Cohn et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5752252 | Zbikowski et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757915 | Aucsmith et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764880 | Gerdt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781797 | Crick et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5799324 | McNutt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802344 | Menon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815707 | Krause et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832515 | Ledain et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857207 | Lo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873097 | Harris et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5923878 | Marsland | Jul 1999 | A |
5991893 | Snider | Nov 1999 | A |
5996054 | Ledain et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006227 | Freeman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021408 | Ledain et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021509 | Gerdt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038668 | Chipman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6065100 | Schafer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079047 | Cotugno et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6101186 | Craig | Aug 2000 | A |
6108420 | Larose et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128630 | Shackelford | Oct 2000 | A |
6148368 | DeKoning | Nov 2000 | A |
6240527 | Schneider et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260036 | Almasi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6321239 | Shackelford | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336164 | Gerdt et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347397 | Curtis | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366987 | Tzelnic et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367008 | Rollins | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377958 | Orcutt | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381682 | Noel et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6418509 | Yanai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430548 | Deis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438594 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449688 | Peters et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490664 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6526570 | Click, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529909 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535949 | Parker | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6577254 | Rasmussen | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597812 | Fallon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601104 | Fallon | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604158 | Fallon | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624761 | Fallon | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625671 | Collette et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628411 | Miller et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633244 | Avery et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633883 | Koskas | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643405 | Sako | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643652 | Helgeson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654851 | McKean | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657565 | Kampf | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6664903 | Kugai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667700 | McCanne et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6704839 | Butterworth et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711709 | York | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6732125 | Autrey et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738863 | Butterworth et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741747 | Burns et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742028 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6775781 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782319 | McDonough | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785768 | Peters et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795640 | Honda | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6795897 | Benveniste et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804718 | Pang et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6847681 | Saunders et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856993 | Verma et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6901403 | Bata et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6915339 | Hartman et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925533 | Lewis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944619 | Gruenwald | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947556 | Matyas, Jr. et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6983456 | Poznanovic et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7051031 | Schein | May 2006 | B2 |
7085766 | Keith, Jr. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7088823 | Fetkovich | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100047 | Stamos et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107267 | Taylor | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7146009 | Andivahis et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191189 | Bhatti | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7225333 | Peinado et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7272687 | Balasubramanian | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7340581 | Gorobets et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7370319 | Pensak et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373362 | Detweiler et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7392383 | Basibes et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7409470 | Halstead et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7418588 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7428547 | Basso et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444625 | Anwar et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454411 | Birdwell et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7487363 | Alve et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502713 | Hillier et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512748 | Mason et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7523221 | Hillberg et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530016 | Sahota et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7536418 | Buchsbaum et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546221 | Moon et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7546335 | Moeller et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549174 | Falkner et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7647355 | Best et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702995 | Sahota et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7783765 | Hildebrand et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802082 | Kruse et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805755 | Brown et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809897 | Mason et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7823210 | Bessonov et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7930756 | Crocker et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7949693 | Manson et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
8024433 | Mason et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8266114 | Mace et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8442236 | De Petris et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8539228 | Mason et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
20020052868 | Mohindra et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073066 | Coutts et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020143735 | Ayi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030110478 | Duesterwald et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123446 | Muirhead et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040015958 | Veil et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040250247 | Deeths et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050114356 | Bhatti | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144189 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050240966 | Hindle et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060031246 | Grayson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070076 | Ma | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101025 | Tichy et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123250 | Maheshwari et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060190417 | Hilkemeyer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195476 | Nori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060277153 | Mason et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080134154 | Patel et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090249277 | Prakash | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100094806 | Apostolides et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100211616 | Khandelwal et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217948 | Mason et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20130046846 | Mason et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130117293 | Mason et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1320010 | Jun 2003 | EP |
WO 2006081508 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burrows et al., “On-line Data Compression in a Log-structured File System,” proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Oct. 12-15, 1992, ACM Press, pp. 1-21. |
Rosenblum, Mendel and Ousterhout, John K., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 10, No. 1, Feb. 1992; pp. 26-52. |
“Sponsor Sessions,” http://microsoft.com/whdc/driverdevcon/ddctracks2005/d05—sponsors.mspx, updated Mar. 25, 2005, printed Apr. 25, 2006, 2 pages. |
“Windows Driver Devcon 2005; Practical Challenges in Implementing Encryption/Compression Filters,” Microsoft Windows Hardware & Driver Central, Microsoft Corporation, 2005, 21 pages. |
Mac OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference, Oct. 3, 2006, 62 pages. |
“Windows Streams—An Introduction to File System Streams,” printed from http://www.osronline.com, The NT Insider, vol. 13, Issue 2, Mar.- Apr. 2006, Apr. 17, 2006, 6 pages. |
Duncan, Geoff, “Man Buys Used iPod with U.S. Troop Data”, Jan. 27, 2009, printed from http://digitaltrends.com/international/man-buys-used-ipod-with-us-troop-data/ (1 page). |
Office Action (Interview Summary) issued on May 23, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action (Interview Summary) issued on Nov. 14, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Feb. 23, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Jul. 20, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 19, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Sep. 16, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Aug. 3, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Response to Nov. 14, 2007 Office Action (Interview Summary) filed Dec. 4, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action (Interview Summary) issued on Feb. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Examiner's Answer issued on Jul. 7, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action (Interview Summary) issued on Apr. 8, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Decision on Appeal issued on Jan. 29, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Oral Hearing Held Jan. 17, 2013 issued on Feb. 20, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Dec. 8, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391. |
Office Action issued on Jul. 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391. |
Office Action issued on Feb. 23, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391, filed Aug. 24, 2006. |
Office Action issued on Aug. 26, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391. |
Office Action issued on Dec. 19, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391. |
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary issued on Jul. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/509,391. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 30, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,147. |
Office Action issued on Feb. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,147. |
Notice of Allowance mailed May 26, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,147. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,102, filed Aug. 23, 2007. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 2, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,102. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 16, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,102. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 20, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,102. |
Notice of Abandonment under 37 CFR 1.53(f) or (g) mailed Oct. 11, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/985,923. |
Office Action issued on Sep. 8, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/505,582. |
Notice of Allowability issued on Dec. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/505,582. |
Office Action issued on Dec. 15, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,712. |
Office Action issued on May 20, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,712. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 1, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/388,712. |
Bressoud, Thomas C. et al., “OpenCAS: A Flexible Architecture for Content Addressable Storage”, Proceedings of the ISCA 17th International Conference, Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems, San Francisco, California, Sep. 15-17, 2004, pp. 580-587. |
Sun, Hongwei, “Client caching features: Oplock vs. Lease,” May 22, 2009, downloaded from http://blogs.msdn.com/b/openspecification/archive/2009/05/22/client-caching-features-oplock-vs-lease.aspx on Jan. 15, 2014. |
Heinrich, Mark Andrew, “The Performance and Scalability of Distributed Shared Memory Cache Coherence Protocols,” Chapter 2, Cache Coherence Protocols, Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Oct. 1998, downloaded from http://www.csl.cornell.edu/˜heinrich/dissertation/ on Jan. 15, 2014. |
Mason, W. Anthony, “Locks,” seminar slides presented in 2008, OSR Open Systems Resources, Inc., 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary issued on Jun. 19, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability issued on Jul. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,433. |
Office Action issued on Nov. 10, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,209. |
Office Action issued on Mar. 3, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,209. |
Examiner interview summary issued on May 25, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,209. |
Office Action issued on Nov. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,209. |
Office Action issued on May 10, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,209. |
Notice of Abandonment issued on Dec. 17, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/658,209. |
Office Action issued on Dec. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/668,033. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/156,132, filed Jan. 15, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130311493 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11145433 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 13947847 | US |