Systems and methods for automatically collection of performance data in a multi-tenant database system environment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9311664
  • Patent Number
    9,311,664
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 3, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 12, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A method of collecting data from multiple sources in a multi-tenant system is provided. The method includes obtaining data corresponding to a first tenant in the multi-tenant system and a second tenant in the multi-tenant system from a first source, obtaining data corresponding to the first tenant in the multi-tenant system and the second tenant in the multi-tenant system from a second source, and aggregating the data obtained from the first and second sources into a single database and associating each entry of the obtained data with at least one of the tenants of the multi-tenant system.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The following relates to data processing systems and processes, and more particularly relates to systems and processes for collecting performance data for multiple tenants in a multi-tenant database system environment.


BACKGROUND

Modern software development is evolving away from the client-server model toward “cloud”-based processing systems that provide access to data and services via the Internet or other networks. In contrast to prior systems that hosted networked applications on dedicated server hardware, the cloud computing model allows applications to be provided over the network “as a service” supplied by an infrastructure provider. The infrastructure provider typically abstracts the underlying hardware and other resources used to deliver a customer-developed application so that the customer no longer needs to operate and support dedicated server hardware. The cloud computing model can often provide substantial cost savings to the customer over the life of the application because the customer no longer needs to provide dedicated network infrastructure, electrical and temperature controls, physical security and other logistics in support of dedicated server hardware.


Although multi-tenant platforms can provide substantial benefits, they can be relatively difficult to design and develop. The often competing demands of integration and isolation between tenants, for example, can lead to any number of challenges in design and implementation. Furthermore, because the multiple tenants are sharing the same infrastructure, it can be difficult to determine usage and performance data for each tenant. For example, it may be desirable to monitor user the usage and performance data to accurately bill each tenant for the amount of infrastructure resources actually used.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

Exemplary embodiments will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the following drawing figures, wherein like numerals denote like elements, and



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary multi-tenant data processing system;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of another exemplary multi-tenant data processing system; and



FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method of collecting performance data in a multi-tenant data processing system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

According to various exemplary embodiments, systems and methods are provided to automatically collect usage and performance data for each tenant in a multi-tenant database system environment.


Turning now to FIG. 1, an exemplary multi-tenant application system 100 suitably includes a server 102 that dynamically creates virtual applications 128A-B based upon data 132 from a common database 130 that is shared between multiple tenants. The server 102 may be referred to as, for example, an origin application server. Data and services generated by the virtual applications 128A-B are provided via network 145 to any number of client devices 140A-B, as desired. Each virtual application 128A-B is suitably generated at run-time using a common platform 110 that securely provides access to data 132 in database 130 for each of the various tenants subscribing to system 100. The multi-tenant application system 100 may also include any number of content delivery networks (“CDNs”) 160A-B, as desired. The CDNs 160A-B may contain a copy of at least some of the data 132 which may be accessible via the network 145 as described in further detail below. The multi-tenant application system 100 may also employ any number of proxy servers 170A-B which may be used to direct traffic between the server 102 and the CDNs 160A-B.


A “tenant” generally refers to a group of users that shares access to common data within database 130. Tenants may represent customers, customer departments, business or legal organizations, and/or any other entities that maintain data for particular sets of users within system 100. Although multiple tenants may share access to a common server 102 and database 130, the particular data and services provided from server 102 to each tenant can be securely isolated from those provided to other tenants, as described more fully below. The multi-tenant architecture therefore allows different sets of users to share functionality without necessarily sharing each other's data 132.


Database 130 is any sort of repository or other data storage system capable of storing and managing data 132 associated with any number of tenants. Database 130 may be implemented using any type of conventional database server hardware. In various embodiments, database 130 shares processing hardware 104 with server 102. In other embodiments, database 130 is implemented using separate physical and/or virtual database server hardware that communicates with server 102 to perform the various functions described herein.


Server 102 is implemented using one or more actual and/or virtual computing systems that collectively provide a dynamic application platform 110 for generating virtual applications 128A-B. Server 102 operates with any sort of conventional computing hardware 104, such as any processor 105, memory 106, input/output features 107 and the like. Processor 105 may be implemented using one or more of microprocessors, microcontrollers, processing cores and/or other computing resources spread across any number of distributed or integrated systems, including any number of “cloud-based” or other virtual systems. Memory 106 represents any non-transitory short or long term storage capable of storing programming instructions for execution on processor 105, including any sort of random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, magnetic or optical mass storage, and/or the like. Input/output features 107 represent conventional interfaces to networks (e.g., to network 145, or any other local area, wide area or other network), mass storage, display devices, data entry devices and/or the like. In a typical embodiment, application platform 110 gains access to processing resources, communications interfaces and other features of hardware 104 using any sort of conventional or proprietary operating system 108. As noted above, server 102 may be implemented using a cluster of actual and/or virtual servers operating in conjunction with each other, typically in association with conventional network communications, cluster management, load balancing and other features as appropriate.


When the data and services generated by the virtual applications 128A-B are provided via network 145 to the any number of client devices 140A-B a log of each event is stored in Log 150. As discussed above, some of the data 132 stored in the database 130 may also be stored in any number of CDNs 160A-B. CDNs are usually deployed in multiple locations, often over multiple backbones. These CDNs 160A-B cooperate with each other, the server 102 and any proxy servers 17A-B to satisfy requests for content by end users of client devices 140A-B, transparently moving content to optimize the delivery process. Optimization can take the form of reducing bandwidth costs, improving end-user performance (reducing page load times and improving user experience), or increasing global availability of content. Similar to the log 150 in server 102, the CDNs 160A-B each have a log 162A-B storing a log of each event. Each proxy server 172A-B may also have a log for storing events.


The logs (log 150, 162A-B and 172A-B) may record when an action occurs. For example, an entry may be added to a logs whenever a page is viewed or bandwidth is used on the respective server. The logs may also increment a counter associated with a page whenever the page is viewed. A tier may also be associated with each action by the respective server. The tier associated with the page view will often depend upon the content on the page. Any number of tiers can be associated with the page views. The logs may also store a bandwidth consumed by each page view and and/or a request time associated with each page request. In another embodiment, the logs 150, 162A-B and 172A-B may store a request time, the time the respective server within the multi-tenant application system 100 takes to serve a customer request.


The server 102 collects performance data from logs 150, 162A-b and/or 172A-B and aggregates the data into a single database as described in further detail below. In another embodiment, a separate billing server (not illustrated) may collect the performance data from server 102, the CDNs 160A-B and any proxy servers 170A-B. In one embodiment, for example, the proxy servers 170A-B may be reverse proxy servers.



FIG. 2 illustrates another exemplary multi-tenant application system 200 in accordance with an embodiment. The multi-tenant application system 200 includes client devices 140A-B, network 145, CDNs 160A-B and proxy servers 170A-B similar to those described above. The multi-tenant application system 200 further includes a server 102 that dynamically creates virtual applications 128A-B based upon data 132 from a common database 130 that is shared between multiple tenants. Data and services generated by the virtual applications 128A-B are provided via network 145 to any number of client devices 140A-B, as desired. Each virtual application 128A-B is suitably generated at run-time using a common platform 110 that securely provides access to data 132 in database 130 for each of the various tenants subscribing to system 100.


Data 132 may be organized and formatted in any manner to support multi-tenant application platform 110. In various embodiments, data 132 is suitably organized into a relatively small number of large data tables to maintain a semi-amorphous “heap”-type format. Data 132 can then be organized as needed for a particular virtual application 128A-B. In various embodiments, conventional data relationships are established using any number of pivot tables 234 that establish indexing, uniqueness, relationships between entities, and/or other aspects of conventional database organization as desired.


Further data manipulation and report formatting is generally performed at run-time using a variety of meta-data constructs. Metadata within a universal data directory (UDD) 236, for example, can be used to describe any number of forms, reports, workflows, user access privileges, business logic and other constructs that are common to multiple tenants. Tenant-specific formatting, functions and other constructs may be maintained as tenant-specific metadata 238A-B for each tenant, as desired. Rather than forcing data 132 into an inflexible global structure that is common to all tenants and applications, then, database 130 is organized to be relatively amorphous, with tables 234 and metadata 236-238 providing additional structure on an as-needed basis. To that end, application platform 110 suitably uses tables 234 and/or metadata 236, 238 to generate “virtual” components of applications 128A-B to logically obtain, process, and present the relatively amorphous data 132 from database 130.


Application platform 110 is any sort of software application or other data processing engine that generates virtual applications 128A-B that provide data and/or services to client devices 140A-B. Virtual applications 128A-B are typically generated at run-time in response to queries received from client devices 140A-B. In the example illustrated in FIG. 2, application platform 110 includes a bulk data processing engine 212, a query generator 214, a search engine 216 that provides text indexing and other search functionality, and a runtime application generator 220. Each of these features may be implemented as a separate process or other module, and many equivalent embodiments could include different and/or additional features, components or other modules as desired.


Runtime application generator 220 dynamically builds and executes virtual applications 128A-B in response to specific requests received from client devices 140A-B. Virtual applications 128A-B created by tenants are typically constructed in accordance with tenant-specific metadata 238, which describes the particular tables, reports, interfaces and/or other features of the particular application. In various embodiments, each virtual application 128A-B generates dynamic web content that can be served to a browser or other client program 142A-B associated with client device 140A-B, as appropriate.


Application generator 220 suitably interacts with query generator 214 to efficiently obtain multi-tenant data 132 from database 130 as needed. In a typical embodiment, query generator 214 considers the identity of the user requesting a particular function, and then builds and executes queries to database 130 using system-wide metadata 236, tenant specific metadata 238, pivot tables 234 and/or any other available resources. Query generator 214 in this example therefore maintains security of the multi-tenant database 130 by ensuring that queries are consistent with access privileges granted to the user that initiated the request.


Data processing engine 212 performs bulk processing operations on data 132 such as uploads or downloads, updates, online transaction processing and/or the like. In many embodiments, less urgent bulk processing of data 132 can be scheduled to occur as processing resources become available, thereby giving priority to more urgent data processing by query generator 214, search engine 216, virtual applications 128A-B and/or the like. Again, the various components, modules and inter-relationships of other application platforms 120 may vary from the particular examples described herein.


In operation, then, developers use application platform 110 to create data-driven virtual applications 128A-B for the tenants that they support. Such applications 128A-B may make use of interface features such as tenant-specific screens 224, universal screens 222 or the like. Any number of tenant-specific and/or universal objects 226 may also be available for integration into tenant-developed applications 128A-B. Data 132 associated with each application 128A-B is provided to database 130, as appropriate, and stored until requested, along with metadata 138 that describes the particular features (e.g., reports, tables, functions, etc.) of tenant-specific application 128A-B until needed.


Data and services provided by server 102 can be retrieved using any sort of personal computer, mobile telephone, tablet or other network-enabled client device 140 on network 145. Typically, the user operates a conventional browser or other client program 242 to contact server 102 via network 145 using, for example, the hypertext transport protocol (HTTP) or the like. The user typically authenticates his or her identity to the server 102 to obtain a session identification (“SessionID”) that identifies the user in subsequent communications with server 102. When the identified user requests access to a virtual application 128A-B, application generator 220 suitably creates the application at run time based upon metadata 236 and 238, as appropriate. Query generator 214 suitably obtains the requested data 132 from database 130 as needed to populate the tables, reports or other features of virtual application 128A-B. As noted above, the virtual application 128A-B may contain Java, ActiveX or other content that can be presented using conventional client software 142A-B running on client device 140A-B; other embodiments may simply provide dynamic web or other content that can be presented and viewed by the user, as desired.


Whenever a request is received by a server connected to the multi-tenant application system 200 (i.e., server 102, CND 160A-B, proxy server 170A-B, etc), the respective server creates a log entry in a respective log. The servers within the multi-tenant application system 200 may log page views, bandwidth usage, request time and any other usage or performance data as needed.



FIG. 3 illustrates a method 300 for collecting performance data in accordance with an embodiment. The server 102 obtains the page views from each log (e.g. logs 150, 162A-B, 172, etc.). (Step 310). The server 102 may obtain the page views at any time and at any frequency. In one embodiment, for example, the server 102 may obtain the page views at a predetermined time each day. The server 102 may obtain the page views once per day, multiple times per day, once per week, multiple times per week, once per month and/or multiple times each month. The server 102 may then obtain the bandwidth values stored in each log (e.g. logs 150, 162A-B, 172, etc.). (Step 320). The server 102 may obtain the bandwidth values simultaneously with the pages views or at a separate time (before or after). The bandwidth values may be obtained at the same frequency as the page views or at a different frequency. In one embodiment, for example, the bandwidth values may be obtained one hour after the server 102 obtains the page views.


The server 102 may obtain the page views and bandwidth values for any predetermined period of time. In one embodiment, for example, the frequency at which the page views and bandwidth values are obtained may differ from the period of time the page views and bandwidth values are obtained. For example, in one embodiment the server 102 may obtain page view and bandwidth values once a day, each time obtaining the data, for example, for the past two days or three days. By obtaining the same data multiple times over different days, the server 102 may verify that the data is correct and that there have been no changes, as discussed in further detail below.


If the server 102 fails to obtain the data from any one of the servers (CDNs, proxy servers, etc) at steps 310 or 320, the server 102 can try to re-obtain the data. (Steps 312 and 322). The server 102 may try to re-obtain the data immediately after the failed attempt, or at a subsequent time. In one embodiment, if the server 102 fails to obtain data from one of the CDNs, for example, the server 102 may increase the amount of data captured on a subsequent obtain. For example, if the server 102 failed in an attempt to obtain the past two days values for page views, the server 102 in the subsequent obtain may attempt to obtain the past three days values for page views.


If the logs are recording events which the server 102 is uninterested in, the server 102 may filter the page views and bandwidth data obtained from the logs. (Step 330). For example, for billing purposes the server 102 may not be interested in static content (e.g., images, JavaScript, css files) or AJAX requests. In another embodiment, for example, the server 102 may also filter out test data. If the server is monitoring performance, other types of page views may be filtered. Furthermore, the filtering may be done on a tenant-by-tenant fashion. For example, certain events may be filtered for one tenant based upon filtering settings associated with that tenant, but the event may not be filtered for another tenant. The filtering can be performed by any known manner. For example, in one embodiment the server 102 may perform the filtering by analyzing a uniform resource locator (“URL”) associated with each page view and bandwidth value. In another embodiment only the page views may be filtered. The server 102 may, for example, parse a URL associated with a page view to determine a type associated with the page view. The server 102, at step 330, may also associate a tier with each page view based upon the type associated with each page view. In one embodiment, for example, a page which is associated with media content my have a higher tier than a page which is associated with plain text. The tiers, for example, may be billed at different rates, or may be used to partition the data into different performance categories.


In another embodiment an identification code identifying a content type may be stored with each entry in the logs (e.g. logs 150, 162A-B, 172, etc.). The server may obtain the identification code and filter the obtained information based upon the identification code. In yet another embodiment the server 102 may only obtain logged events with a predefined set of identification codes.


The server 102 may then determine which tenant is associated with each entry in the logs. (Step 340). In one embodiment, for example, the server 102 may determine which tenant is associated with each log entry by parsing a URL associated with the log entry. In one embodiment, for example, the server 102 may aggregate all of the page view data and bandwidth value data into a single database, while tagging each of the entries to indicate which tenant the entry belongs to. In another embodiment, for example, the server may generate a separate database for each tenant including all of the page views and bandwidth values related to the tenant. In yet another embodiment, the server may generate both an aggregate database with all of the data and an individual database for each tenant with all of the data relating to the tenant.


As discussed above, the same data may be obtained multiple times depending by the frequency at which the data is obtained and the length of time over which the data is obtained. If the data for an entry in the aggregate and/or individual databases has been previously obtained, the server 102 at step 340 may also compare the previously obtained data to the currently stored data. In one embodiment, for example, if the new data differs from the previously stored data, the server 102 overwrites the old data entry with the new data entry. In another embodiment, the data from each obtain may be saved for later analysis. For example, if the data is being used to generate a bill for a tenant based upon the usage of the multi-tenant system 100 (e.g., based upon the number of page views and/or bandwidth usage), all of the accumulated data may be saved and then analyzed prior to a bill generation. One benefit, for example, of obtaining the same data multiple times is that each server which is logging the data may have a different logging system, a logging system may be temporarily backed up, or a logging system may lag being in page view aggregations. Accordingly, by obtaining the same data multiple times, a more accurate set of performance data for each tenant on the multiple servers may be created.


The server 102 may then store the aggregate and/or individual databases in a memory. (Step 350). The aggregate and/or individual databases may be stored in memory 106, in database 130 or in any other memory in communication with the server 102. In one embodiment, for example, the aggregate and/or individual databases may be accessible by each tenant such that the tenant can view its own performance data or usage data. In another embodiment, once the data is collected, the data may be exposable to another tenant that runs a billing system. As discussed above, the page view data and bandwidth value data may be used to generate a usage bill for each tenant in the multi-tenant system 100. The collected data may be used, for example, for tiered billing. In one embodiment, for example, the billing system may associate one price with bandwidth usage and another price for page views.


Generally speaking, the various functions and features of method 300 may be carried out with any sort of hardware, software and/or firmware logic that is stored and/or executed on any platform. Some or all of method 300 may be carried out, for example, by logic executing within system 100 in FIG. 1. For example, various functions shown in FIG. 3 may be implemented using software or firmware logic that is stored in memory 106 and executed by processor 105 as part of application platform 110. The particular hardware, software and/or firmware logic that implements any of the various functions shown in FIG. 3, however, may vary from context to context, implementation to implementation, and embodiment to embodiment in accordance with the various features, structures and environments set forth herein. The particular means used to implement each of the various functions shown in FIG. 3, then, could be any sort of processing structures that are capable of executing software and/or firmware logic in any format, and/or any sort of application-specific or general purpose hardware, including any sort of discrete and/or integrated circuitry.


The term “exemplary” is used herein to represent one example, instance or illustration that may have any number of alternates. Any implementation described herein as “exemplary” should not necessarily be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations.


Although several exemplary embodiments have been presented in the foregoing description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of alternate but equivalent variations exist, and the examples presented herein are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. To the contrary, various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of the various features described herein without departing from the scope of the claims and their legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method of collecting data from at least one origin application server and at least one content delivery network forming a multi-tenant system, comprising: obtaining, by a processor, usage data corresponding to a first tenant and a second tenant in the multi-tenant system from the at least one origin application server, the at least one origin application server dynamically creating virtual applications based upon data from a common database that is shared between the first tenant and the second tenant and hosting the virtual applications for the first tenant and the second tenant;obtaining, by the processor, usage data from the at least one content delivery network corresponding to usage of the at least one content delivery network by the first tenant and the second tenant in the multi-tenant system; andaggregating, by the processor, the usage data obtained from the origin application server and the content delivery network into a single database and associating each entry of the aggregated usage data with one of the first tenant and the second tenant of the multi-tenant system.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising filtering, by the processor, the aggregated usage data based upon a content type associated with the aggregated usage data.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the filtering further comprising parsing, by the processor, a uniform resource locator associated with the aggregated usage data to determine the content type associated with the aggregated usage data.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, further comprising associating, by the processor, a tier with the aggregated usage data based upon the content type associated with the aggregated usage data.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising generating, by the processor, a bill for the first tenant and the second tenant based upon the aggregated usage data.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising obtaining, by the processor, usage data corresponding to the first tenant and the second tenant from a third source different from the origin application server and the content delivery network.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the third source is a proxy server.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising aggregating, by the processor, the aggregated usage data into a separate database, each separate database associated with one of the first tenant and the second tenant of the multi-tenant system.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregated usage data includes page view data and bandwidth value data.
  • 10. A method for collecting billing data from at least one origin application server and at least one content delivery network forming a multi-tenant system, comprising: obtaining, by a processor, page view entries corresponding to a plurality of tenants from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network at a first predetermined frequency;obtaining, by the processor, bandwidth value entries corresponding to the plurality of tenants from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network at a second predetermined frequency; andaggregating, by the processor, the page view entries and the bandwidth value entries obtained from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network into a single database,wherein the at least one origin application server dynamically creates virtual applications based upon data from a common database that is shared between the plurality of tenants and hosts the virtual applications for the plurality of tenants.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the aggregating further comprises associating, by the processor, a corresponding one of the plurality of tenants with each of the aggregated page view entries and the aggregated bandwidth value entries.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising: obtaining, by the processor, request time value entries corresponding to the plurality of tenants from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network at a third predetermined frequency;aggregating, by the processor, the page view entries, the bandwidth value entries and the request time value entries obtained from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network into the single database; andassociating, by the processor, a tier with each of the aggregated page view entries, the aggregated bandwidth value entries and the aggregated request time value entries.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising calculating, by the processor, a bill for each tenant of the plurality of tenants based upon the aggregated page view entries and the aggregated bandwidth values associated with each tenant and the tier associated with each aggregated page view entry and aggregated bandwidth value entry.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein a time period over which the page view entries are obtained is longer than a time period of the first predetermined frequency.
  • 15. A system for collecting performance data in a multi-tenant database system comprising at least one origin application server and at least one content delivery network, the system comprising: a memory; anda server communicatively connected to the memory and communicatively connected to the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network, the server configured to: collect page view entries corresponding to a plurality of tenants from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network at a first predetermined frequency;collect bandwidth entries data corresponding to a plurality of tenants from the at least one origin application server and the at least one content delivery network at a second predetermined frequency;aggregate the page view entries and bandwidth value entries obtained from plurality of sources into a single database; andstoring the single database in the memory,wherein the at least one origin application server dynamically creates virtual applications based upon data from a common database that is shared between the plurality of tenants and hosts the virtual applications for the plurality of tenants.
  • 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the server is further configured to associate a corresponding one tenant of the plurality of tenants with each of the aggregated page view entries and aggregated bandwidth value entries.
  • 17. The system of claim 15, wherein the server is further configured to associate a tier with each of the aggregated page view entries and the aggregated bandwidth value entries.
  • 18. The system of claim 17 wherein the server is further configured to calculate a bill for each tenant of the plurality of tenants based upon the aggregated page view entries and the aggregated bandwidth values associated with each tenant and the tier associated with each aggregated page view entry and each aggregated bandwidth value entry.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/348,204, filed May 25, 2010, the entire content of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (173)
Number Name Date Kind
4577977 Pejsa Mar 1986 A
5577188 Zhu Nov 1996 A
5608872 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5649104 Carleton et al. Jul 1997 A
5715450 Ambrose et al. Feb 1998 A
5761419 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5819038 Carleton et al. Oct 1998 A
5821937 Tonelli et al. Oct 1998 A
5831610 Tonelli et al. Nov 1998 A
5873096 Lim et al. Feb 1999 A
5918159 Fomukong et al. Jun 1999 A
5963953 Cram et al. Oct 1999 A
6016307 Kaplan Jan 2000 A
6092083 Brodersen et al. Jul 2000 A
6169534 Raffel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178425 Brodersen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189011 Lim et al. Feb 2001 B1
6216135 Brodersen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233617 Rothwein et al. May 2001 B1
6266669 Brodersen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6295530 Ritchie et al. Sep 2001 B1
6324568 Diec et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324693 Brodersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336137 Lee et al. Jan 2002 B1
D454139 Feldcamp et al. Mar 2002 S
6367077 Brodersen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378073 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6393605 Loomans May 2002 B1
6405220 Brodersen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6434550 Warner et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446089 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6535909 Rust Mar 2003 B1
6546392 Bahlmann Apr 2003 B1
6549908 Loomans Apr 2003 B1
6553563 Ambrose et al. Apr 2003 B2
6560461 Fomukong et al. May 2003 B1
6574635 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 B2
6577726 Huang et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601087 Zhu et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604117 Lim et al. Aug 2003 B2
6604128 Diec Aug 2003 B2
6609150 Lee et al. Aug 2003 B2
6621834 Scherpbier et al. Sep 2003 B1
6654032 Zhu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665648 Brodersen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665655 Warner et al. Dec 2003 B1
6684438 Brodersen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711565 Subramaniam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724399 Katchour et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728702 Subramaniam et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728960 Loomans et al. Apr 2004 B1
6732095 Warshavsky et al. May 2004 B1
6732100 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B1
6732111 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B2
6747968 Seppala Jun 2004 B1
6754681 Brodersen et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763351 Subramaniam et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763501 Zhu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6768904 Kim Jul 2004 B2
6782383 Subramaniam et al. Aug 2004 B2
6804330 Jones et al. Oct 2004 B1
6823384 Wilson Nov 2004 B1
6826565 Ritchie et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826582 Chatterjee et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826745 Coker Nov 2004 B2
6829655 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B1
6832250 Coons Dec 2004 B1
6842748 Warner et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850533 Gerszberg Feb 2005 B2
6850895 Brodersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6850949 Warner et al. Feb 2005 B2
7117526 Short Oct 2006 B1
7143411 Circenis Nov 2006 B2
7340411 Cook Mar 2008 B2
7617136 Lessing Nov 2009 B1
7620655 Larsson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7680825 Becker Mar 2010 B2
7689593 Becker Mar 2010 B2
7698160 Beaven et al. Apr 2010 B2
7739348 Becker Jun 2010 B2
7779039 Weissman Aug 2010 B2
7814052 Bezar Oct 2010 B2
8082301 Ahlgren et al. Dec 2011 B2
8095413 Beaven Jan 2012 B1
8095594 Beaven et al. Jan 2012 B2
8200628 An Jun 2012 B2
8275836 Beaven et al. Sep 2012 B2
8321405 Weissman Nov 2012 B2
8326876 Venkataraman Dec 2012 B1
8412673 Weissenberger Apr 2013 B2
8452726 Kuruganti May 2013 B2
8458346 Schmidt Jun 2013 B2
8495080 Gao Jul 2013 B2
8565422 Lee Oct 2013 B2
8577870 Rajan Nov 2013 B2
8713693 Shanabrook Apr 2014 B2
8875122 Driesen Oct 2014 B2
20010044791 Richter et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020010601 Taylor Jan 2002 A1
20020016776 Chu Feb 2002 A1
20020033416 Gerszberg Mar 2002 A1
20020052765 Taylor May 2002 A1
20020072951 Lee et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082892 Raffel Jun 2002 A1
20020129352 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140731 Subramaniam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143997 Huang et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162090 Parnell et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165742 Robbins Nov 2002 A1
20030004971 Gong Jan 2003 A1
20030018705 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018830 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030066031 Laane et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030066032 Ramachandran Apr 2003 A1
20030069936 Warner et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070000 Coker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070004 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070005 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074418 Coker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030120675 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030151633 George et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159136 Huang Aug 2003 A1
20030187921 Diec Oct 2003 A1
20030189600 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204427 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206192 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225730 Warner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030233404 Hopkins Dec 2003 A1
20040001092 Rothwein et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010489 Rio et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015981 Coker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040027388 Berg Feb 2004 A1
20040128001 Levin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040186860 Lee et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193510 Catahan et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199489 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199536 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199543 Braud et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040210909 Dominguez, Jr. et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249757 Walmsley Dec 2004 A1
20040249854 Barnes-Leon et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260534 Pak Dec 2004 A1
20040260659 Chan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268299 Lei et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050049887 Bulleit Mar 2005 A1
20050050555 Exley et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065925 Weissman Mar 2005 A1
20050091098 Brodersen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050163136 Chiu Jul 2005 A1
20050223022 Weissman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050283478 Choi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060107293 Ma May 2006 A1
20060206834 Fisher et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235831 Adinolfi Oct 2006 A1
20070087756 Hoffberg Apr 2007 A1
20100192207 Raleigh Jul 2010 A1
20100192212 Raleigh Jul 2010 A1
20100217758 Weissman Aug 2010 A1
20100223254 Weissman Sep 2010 A1
20100223255 Weissman Sep 2010 A1
20100228650 Shacham Sep 2010 A1
20100281015 Weissman Nov 2010 A1
20100281016 Weissman Nov 2010 A1
20100332615 Short Dec 2010 A1
20110219050 Ly Sep 2011 A1
20110238709 Liu Sep 2011 A1
20110295728 Bulumulla Dec 2011 A1
20120331000 Mehra Dec 2012 A1
20130013773 Weissman Jan 2013 A1
20130046752 Weissman Feb 2013 A1
20140283010 Rutkowski Sep 2014 A1
20150040121 Barabash Feb 2015 A1
20150139238 Pourzandi May 2015 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Process Model for Cloud Service Engineering byGurdev Singh, Prince Jain, Isha Gulati; International Jouranl of Computer Applications (0975-8887) vol. 36—No. 8, Dec. 2011.
Methodologies for energy benchmarking, rating by T. Nikolaou, D. Kolokotsa and G. Stavrakakis; Advances in building and energy research, 2011 vol. 5, pp. 53-70.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110295728 A1 Dec 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61348204 May 2010 US