The present invention generally relates to streaming media and more specifically to the automatic generation of top level index files for use in adaptive bitrate streaming.
The term streaming media describes the playback of media on a playback device, where the media is stored on a server and continuously sent to the playback device over a network during playback. Typically, the playback device stores a sufficient quantity of media in a buffer at any given time during playback to prevent disruption of playback due to the playback device completing playback of all the buffered media prior to receipt of the next portion of media. Adaptive bit rate streaming or adaptive streaming involves detecting the present streaming conditions (e.g. the playback device's network bandwidth and video decoding capacity) in real time and adjusting the quality of the streamed media accordingly. Typically, the source media is encoded as separate streams having different maximum bitrates and the playback device or client switches between streaming the different encodings depending on available resources. When a playback device commences adaptive bitrate streaming, the playback device typically starts by requesting portions of media from an initial set of streams. As the playback device downloads the requested media, the playback device can measure the available bandwidth. In the event that the available bandwidth increases or decreases, the playback device can switch to higher or lower bitrate streams.
Adaptive streaming solutions typically utilize Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), published by the Internet Engineering Task Force and the World Wide Web Consortium as RFC 2616, to stream media between a server and a playback device. HTTP is a stateless protocol that enables a playback device to request a byte range within a file. HTTP is described as stateless, because the server is not required to record information concerning the state of the playback device requesting information or the byte ranges requested by the playback device in order to respond to requests received from the playback device.
In adaptive streaming systems, the source media is typically stored on a media server as a top level index file pointing to a number of alternate streams that contain the actual video and audio data. Each stream is typically stored in one or more container files. Different adaptive streaming solutions typically utilize different index and media containers. The Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) developed by the World Wide Web Consortium is utilized to create indexes in several adaptive streaming solutions including IIS Smooth Streaming developed by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., and Flash Dynamic Streaming developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated of San Jose, Calif. HTTP Adaptive Bitrate Streaming developed by Apple Computer Incorporated of Cupertino, Calif. implements index files using an extended M3U playlist file (.M3U8), which is a text file containing a list of URIs that typically identify a media container file. The most commonly used media container formats are the MP4 container format specified in MPEG-4 Part 14 (i.e. ISO/IEC 14496-14) and the MPEG transport stream (TS) container specified in MPEG-2 Part 1 (i.e. ISO/IEC Standard 13818-1). The MP4 container format is utilized in IIS Smooth Streaming and Flash Dynamic Streaming. The TS container is used in HTTP Adaptive Bitrate Streaming.
Systems and methods in accordance with embodiments of the invention automatically generate top level index files for use in adaptive bitrate streaming. One embodiment of the method of the invention includes receiving a request from a playback device at a playback server, where the request identifies a piece of content, retrieving a list of assets associated with the identified piece of content using the playback server, filtering the list of assets using at least one predetermined criterion using the playback server, generating a top level index file describing each asset in the filtered list of assets using the playback server, and sending the top level index file to the playback device using the playback server.
In a further embodiment of the method of the invention, the request from the playback device also includes information describing the capabilities of the playback device, and the playback server filters the list of assets based upon the capabilities of the playback device.
In another embodiment of the method of the invention, the information describing the capabilities of the playback device is a product identifier, and the method further including retrieving at least one device capability based upon the product identifier using the playback server.
In a still further embodiment of the method of the invention, the device capability is at least one device capability selected from the group consisting of: display aspect ratio, anticipated maximum network connection data rate, device outputs, supported formats, device buffer size, device resolution, device region, and device language.
In still another embodiment of the method of the invention, the at least one predetermined criterion includes whether the playback device has access to assets associated with premium content.
In a yet further embodiment of the method of the invention, the request from the playback device also includes information indicative of the geographic location of the playback device, and the at least one predetermined criterion includes whether an asset is permitted to be played back in the geographic location indicated by the request.
In yet another embodiment of the method of the invention, the at least one predetermined criterion includes filtering the assets based upon at least one language.
In a further embodiment again of the method of the invention, the playback server maintains a database of assets associated with specific pieces of content.
In another embodiment again of the method of the invention, the top level index file is a SMIL file.
In a further additional embodiment of the method of the invention, generating a top level index file describing each asset in the filtered list of assets using the playback server includes generating an XML string including a URI for each asset.
Another additional embodiment of the method of the invention also includes generating an XML string including a SWITCH element to describe alternative streams for use in adaptive bitrate streaming.
A still yet further embodiment of the method of the invention also includes generating an XML string including an EXCL element to describe alternative streams for use in conventional streaming.
In still yet another embodiment of the method of the invention, the URI references a container file and the XML string for each assets includes an element that defines the size of a header section of the container file.
In a still further embodiment again of the method of the invention, the XML string includes an element that identifies the encoding of the asset.
In another embodiment again of the method of the invention, the XML string of a video asset includes at least one element selected from the group including an element that describes the maximum bitrate of the video, an element that describes the width and height of the video, and an element that describes the video buffer verifier size of the video.
A still further additional embodiment of the method of the invention includes receiving a request from a playback device at a playback server, where the request identifies a piece of content, retrieving a list of assets associated with the identified piece of content using the playback server, filtering the list of assets using at least one predetermined criterion using the playback server, generating a top level index file describing each asset in the filtered list of assets using the playback server, sending the top level index file to the playback device using the playback server, retrieving cryptographic information using the playback server, where the cryptographic information is used to access protected streams described in the top level index file, and providing the cryptographic information to the playback device using the playback server.
In still another additional embodiment of the method of the invention, the cryptographic information is retrieved by the playback server in response to a request from a playback device to playback the content.
In a yet further embodiment again of the method of the invention, the cryptographic information is retrieved by the playback server from a database of cryptographic information and is encrypted so that the playback device can access the cryptographic information using cryptographic information stored on the playback device.
In yet another embodiment again of the method of the invention, the cryptographic information is retrieved by the playback server from a digital rights management server.
A yet further additional embodiment of the method of the invention also includes confirming that the number of devices on which the user is currently playing back content is less than a predetermined concurrency limit.
Yet another additional embodiment of the method of the invention also includes receiving a play event report from the playback device at the playback server.
A further additional embodiment again of the method of the invention also includes providing a command to the playback device using the playback server in response to the play event report.
In another additional embodiment again of the method of the invention, the play event report includes a playback location.
A still yet further embodiment again of the method of the invention also includes sending a command to resume playback at the playback location indicated in the play event report to a second playback device.
Still yet another embodiment again of the method of the invention also includes sending a command to stop playback to the playback device that generated the play event report using the playback server.
A further embodiment of the invention includes a database that stores descriptions of assets associated with specific pieces of content, and a processor configured using a playback management application. In addition, the playback management application configures the processor to: receive a request from a playback device identifying a piece of content; retrieve a list of assets associated with the identified piece of content; filter the list of assets using at least one predetermined criterion; generate a top level index file describing each asset in the filtered list of assets; and send the top level index file to the playback device.
Another embodiment includes the request from the playback device also includes information describing the capabilities of the playback device, and the playback management application configures the processor to filter the list of assets based upon the capabilities of the playback device.
In a still further embodiment, the information describing the capabilities of the playback device is a product identifier, and the playback management application further configures the processor to retrieve at least one device capability based upon the product identifier.
In still another embodiment, wherein the device capability is at least one device capability selected from the group consisting of: display aspect ratio, anticipated maximum network connection data rate, device outputs, supported formats, device buffer size, display resolution, device region, and device language.
In a yet further embodiment, the at least one predetermined criterion includes whether the playback device has access to assets associated with premium content.
In yet another embodiment, the request from the playback device also includes information indicative of the geographic location of the playback device, and the at least one predetermined criterion includes whether an asset is permitted to be played back in the geographic location indicated by the request.
In a further embodiment again, the at least one predetermined criterion includes filtering the assets based upon one or more languages.
In another embodiment again, the playback server maintains a database of assets associated with specific pieces of content.
In a further additional embodiment, the top level index file is a SMIL file.
In another additional embodiment, the playback management application configures the processor to generate a top level index file describing each asset in the filtered list of assets by configuring the processor to generate an XML string including a URI for each asset.
In a still yet further embodiment, the playback management application further configures the processor to generate an XML string including a SWITCH element to describe alternative streams for use in adaptive bitrate streaming.
In still yet another embodiment, the playback management application further configures the processor to generate an XML string including an EXCL element to describe alternative streams for use in conventional streaming.
In a still further embodiment again, the URI references a container file and the XML string for each asset includes an element that defines the size of a header section of the container file.
In still another embodiment again, the XML string includes an element that identifies the encoding of the asset.
In a still further additional embodiment, the XML string of a video asset includes at least one element selected from the group including an element that describes the maximum bitrate of the video, an element that describes the width and height of the video, and an element that describes the video buffer verifier size of the video.
In still another additional embodiment, playback management application further configures the processor to retrieve cryptographic information, where the cryptographic information is used to access protected streams described in the top level index file, and provide the cryptographic information to the playback device.
In a yet further embodiment again, the playback management application configures the processor to retrieve the cryptographic information in response to a request from a playback device to playback the content.
In yet another embodiment again, the playback management application configures the processor to retrieve the cryptographic information from a database of cryptographic information, and encrypt the retrieved cryptographic information so that the playback device can access the retrieved cryptographic information in the clear using cryptographic information stored on the playback device.
In a yet further additional embodiment, the playback management application configures the processor to retrieve the cryptographic information from a digital rights management server.
In yet another additional embodiment, the playback management application configures the processor to confirm that the number of devices on which the user is playing back content is less than a predetermined concurrency limit.
In a further additional embodiment again, the playback management application configures the processor to receive a play event report from the playback device.
In another additional embodiment again, the playback management application configures the processor to provide a command to the playback device in response to the play event report.
In a still yet further embodiment again, the play event report includes a playback location.
In still yet another embodiment again, the playback management application further configures the processor to send a command to resume playback at the playback location indicated in the play event report to a second playback device.
In a yet further additional embodiment again, the playback management application further configures the processor to send a command to stop playback to the playback device that generated the play event report using the playback server.
Another further embodiment includes a machine readable medium containing processor instructions, where execution of the instructions by a processor causes the processor to perform a process including receiving a request from a playback device identifying a piece of content, retrieving a list of assets associated with the identified piece of content, filtering the list of assets using at least one predetermined criterion, generating a top level index file describing each asset in the filtered list of assets; and sending the top level index file to the playback device.
In still another further embodiment, the execution of the instructions by a processor causes the processor to perform a process further including retrieving cryptographic information, where the cryptographic information is used to access protected streams described in the top level index file, and providing the cryptographic information to the playback device.
Turning now to the drawings, systems and methods for automatically generating top level index files for use in adaptive bitrate streaming in accordance with embodiments of the invention are illustrated. A top level index is a file that describes the location and content of container files containing streams of media (e.g. audio, video, metadata, and subtitles) that can be utilized by the playback device to stream and playback content. In adaptive bitrate streaming systems, the top level index file typically references the alternative streams that the playback device can switch between. In many embodiments, a top level index file is generated in response to a request from a playback device. In several embodiments, the process of generating the top level index file involves determining all of the assets or container files containing streams associated with a specific piece of content and then filtering the assets based upon one or more predetermined criterion. In a number of embodiments, the assets are filtered based upon predetermined criteria including (but not limited to) business rules defined by the content owner, device capabilities, and/or information associated with a user account. In many embodiments, the top level video file that is generated is a SMIL file. In other embodiments, any of a variety of file formats can be utilized to generate top level index files in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
In several embodiments, a playback server automatically generates top level index files in response to a request from a playback device and the playback server can also provide the playback device with cryptographic information enabling playback of protected streams of content. In a number of embodiments, the playback device provides play event reports to the playback server and the playback server can track the playback location of the streams being played back by the playback device. The playback location can be utilized to enable a user to shift between watching content on different playback devices. The user can commence playback on a first device and then request playback on a second device. When the playback server receives a playback request from a second playback device, the playback server can suspend playback on the first playback device and provide an instruction to the second playback device to commence playback at the last playback location reported by the first playback device. Playback devices, playback servers and processes for automatically generating top level index files in response to requests from playback devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
Streaming System Architecture
Adaptive bitrate streaming systems in accordance with many embodiments of the invention include a playback server that automatically generates top level index files in response to requests from playback devices. A streaming system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
To perform adaptive bitrate streaming, the playback devices 12 select content from different alternative streams described in the top level index file. Alternative streams are streams that encode the same media content in different ways. In many instances, alternative streams encode media content (such as but not limited to video) at different maximum bitrates. In a number of embodiments, the alternative streams are encoded with different resolutions and/or at different frame rates. In many embodiments, the top level index file generated by the playback server 18 describes at least the maximum bitrates of each of the alternative streams. The playback device can select one or more streams for conventional streaming or can switch between alternative streams to perform adaptive bitrate streaming.
In several embodiments, playback devices 12 are able to purchase content for streaming via one or more online content stores 22. In many instances, the playback device purchases content via an online content store and receives an electronic token or ticket that the playback device can provide to the playback server 18 to obtain access to the purchased content. When the playback server 18 receives the ticket, the playback server automatically generates a top level index file for the playback device using information stored in the database 20. The playback server is typically a conventional server system configured using a playback management application and in such a way that the playback server can access the database 20. In a number of embodiments, playback devices 12 provide information concerning their playback capabilities to the playback server 18 and the server automatically generates top level index files by filtering assets associated with a purchased piece of content based upon device capabilities. Such capabilities include but are not limited to playback capabilities, display aspect ratio, and/or anticipated maximum network connection data rate. In a number of embodiments, the capabilities of a specific playback device 12 are communicated to the playback server 18 in the form of a product identifier or product ID. The playback server 18 can maintain a database of product IDs and associated device capabilities, and can utilize the product IDs provided by playback devices to retrieve the associated device capabilities and apply filters to lists of available assets when generating a top level index file. Systems and methods for assigning product IDs and associating them with information concerning the capabilities of the devices to which the product IDs are assigned are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/581,598 to Grab et al., entitled “Systems and Methods for Identifying Consumer Electronic Products Using a Playback Device with a Product Identifier”, filed Dec. 29, 2011. The disclosure of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/581,598 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Other filters that can be applied by playback servers in accordance with embodiments of the invention include (but are not limited to) filters based upon the location of the playback device (i.e. country/region), and languages associated with a specific user. Various filters that can be applied to generate a top level index file in accordance with embodiments of the invention are discussed further below.
When the playback server 18 receives a play request, the playback server retrieves cryptographic information required to playback protected streams of content. The playback device can then request portions of container files containing streams of content from one or more servers within a content delivery network 14 and can use the cryptographic information to access protected content. Systems and methods for the digital rights management of protected streams used in adaptive bitrate streaming are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/340,623 to Kiefer et al., entitled “Systems and Methods for Playing Back Alternative Streams of Protected Content Protected Using Common Cryptographic Information”, filed Dec. 29, 2011. The disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/340,623 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
During playback, playback devices 12 can provide play event reports to the playback server 18. The play event reports can include information including (but not limited to) the current stream(s) from which the playback device is requesting data and the current playback location of the playback device. In many embodiments, the playback server 18 responds to the play event reports by instructing the playback device to continue playback or to cease playback. In several embodiments, the playback server enforces concurrency limits on playback devices. The term concurrency limit in the context of adaptive bitrate streaming systems describes the number of playback devices that can simultaneously playback content associated with a specific user account. When a concurrency limit is exceeded, the playback server 18 can send an instruction to a playback device 12 directing it to cease playback. In a number of embodiments, playback location information provided in play event reports can be utilized to enable a user to switch from playing back content on a first device to playing back content on a second device and the second device will automatically resume content playback at the last playback location of the first playback device. In addition, a user that suspends playback on a first playback device can resume playback on the same playback device or a second playback device at some later point in time.
Although a specific streaming system is illustrated in
Playback Devices
In the embodiment illustrated in
During operation, the client application 38 can configure the playback device to purchase content from a content store and request a top level index file 42 from a playback server. As noted above, the request for a top level index file can include the product ID 40 of the playback device, which can be used to filter the assets that are described in the top level index file. When the top level index file 42 is received from the playback server, the client application 38 configures the playback device to store the top level index file 42 in memory 36 and request content cryptographic information 44 to playback requested streams from the playback server (or a separate DRM server) in response to a user instruction to playback content. The content cryptographic information 44 received from the playback server can also be stored in memory 36. The client application 38 can then configure the playback device 30 to playback content by requesting portions of container files containing content from a server within a content delivery network. The specific container files selected by the client application 38 can be determined based upon the information available to the client application within the top level index file 42. When the playback device receives the requested portions of the container files, the client application 38 can access protected content within the requested portions of the container files using the content cryptographic information 44. The client application can continue to request and playback content from different container files depending upon the prevailing streaming conditions until a user instruction suspending playback is received or until playback completes.
Although a specific playback device architecture is illustrated in
Content Playback
A process for playing back content using a top level index file generated in response to a request from a playback device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
When a playback device possesses a top level index file and any necessary cryptographic information, the playback device can commence streaming (58) content by requesting portions of one or more container files containing encoded media. Any of a variety of processes can be utilized to select initial streams including (but not limited to) selecting the lowest bitrate streams, performing a bandwidth probe in a manner similar to the manner disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/251,061 to van der Schaar et al., entitled “Systems and Methods for Determining Available Bandwidth and Performing Initial Stream Selection When Commencing Streaming Using Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, filed Sep. 30, 2011, or estimating available bandwidth using another technique. The disclosure of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/251,061 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Once playback commences (60), adaptive bitrate streaming can be performed. During playback, play event reports can be provided to a playback server to provide information concerning the playback status of the playback device periodically or in response to various events including (but not limited to) user instructions received by the playback device. When a play event report is provided to the playback server, the playback server can provide a play event instruction to the playback device. In the illustrated embodiment, the play event instructions that can be received (62) by the playback device including a “PLAY” instruction to continue playback and a “STOP” instruction to cease playback. As is discussed further below, the ability of a playback server to stop playback on a playback device enables the playback device to enforce concurrency requirements across multiple playback devices associated with a user. The combination of the play event reports and the event playback instructions can also be utilized by the playback server to enable a second playback device to resume playback of content at the last playback location reported by a first playback device. In this way, a user can seamlessly move between playback devices without the need to seek to a location to continue playback.
Although a specific process is illustrated in
Automatic Generation of Top Level Indexes
Playback servers in accordance with embodiments of the invention maintain a database of assets associated with specific pieces of content and can be configured by a playback management application to retrieve and filter information concerning assets to automatically generate a top level index file for a specific playback device. The databases maintained by the playback servers can list the name of the file containing the asset, and the content delivery network(s) on which the asset is located. When the asset is a video stream, the database can describe characteristics of the video stream including (but not limited to) a language associated with the video stream, the maximum bitrate at which the video stream is encoded, the frame rate of the video stream, the resolution and/or sample aspect ratio of the video stream. When the asset is an audio stream, the database can describe characteristics of the audio stream including (but not limited to) the language of the audio stream, the encoding of the audio stream and the bandwidth requirements of the audio stream. When the asset is a subtitle stream, the database can describe characteristics of the subtitle stream including (but not limited to) the language of the subtitle stream, the encoding of the subtitle stream and the bandwidth requirements of the subtitle stream. In addition to maintaining information concerning assets, the playback device can maintain information concerning playback capabilities of playback devices. In a number of embodiments, the information concerning playback capabilities of different playback devices is indexed using a product ID. In many embodiments, the playback device also maintains information concerning rules regulating the usage of different assets based upon criteria including (but not limited to) the type of playback device, the playback capabilities of a playback device, the location of the playback device (e.g. country/region), and/or requested language(s). Although specific pieces of information are described above as being associated in a database maintained by a playback server, any of a variety of pieces of information can be maintained in any of a variety of data structures to enable generation of a top level index file by a playback server in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. As is discussed further below, the information maintained by the playback server can be filtered in real time in response to a request for a top level index file from a playback device to generate a top level index file that only includes links to the assets that the playback device is permitted to playback.
A process for generating a top level index file using information concerning assets associated with specific pieces of content maintained by a playback server in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The playback server retrieves (74) assets associated with the requested piece of content. The playback server filters (76) the assets based upon one or more filters associated with the capabilities of the playback device, the preferences of the user, and the requirements of the content owner. Accordingly, different top level index files can be generated with respect to the same content dependent on factors including (but not limited to) differences in playback capabilities between devices, differences in geographic location, and/or differences in language preferences associated with the playback devices. Processes for retrieving and filtering assets associated with a specific piece of content in accordance with an embodiment of the invention are discussed further below. Following filtering, the remaining assets can be utilized to generate (78) the top level index file, which can be provided (80) to the playback device. In a number of embodiments, the top level index file is securely forward using a secure communication technique including but not limited to Secure Socket Layer (SSL) communication or an equivalent secure communication protocol.
Although a specific process for generating a top level index file in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Filtering Assets for Inclusion in Top Level Index Files
Typically, more assets or streams are created than are necessary for adaptive bitrate streaming of content by a playback device. In many instances, video streams are created for different classes of playback device. For example, lower bitrate streams can be created for devices that will stream content over cellular data networks and higher bitrate streams can be created for devices that will stream content over a home network connected to the Internet via a high speed Internet connection. In addition, different video streams can be created with different aspect ratios and different audio streams can be created for different languages. In several embodiments, content stores offer premium high resolution content and a playback device that has only purchased lower resolution content is not permitted to access high resolution content. In many embodiments, specific streams may not be accessible in geographic regions. When a top level index file is created in real time in response to a request from a specific playback device, the playback server that creates the top level index file can initially gather information concerning the assets associated with a specific piece of content or title. The playback server can then apply one or more filters to the list of available assets to produce a list of assets that satisfies criteria including (but not limited to) criteria with respect to the capabilities of the playback device, the preferences of the user, and/or the requirements of the content owner.
A process for producing a list of assets to which a playback device is granted access in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
The information concerning assets associated with the content collected by the playback server can include information concerning assets that are both capable of being played back by the playback device and permitted to be played back by the content owner. However, the information may also include information concerning assets that the playback device is not permitted to playback, or assets that are not desired for playback by the user. Assets that may not be permitted for playback can include (but are not limited to) premium content assets that have not been purchased (e.g. a high definition video stream) or assets that are not permitted to be played back within a specific geographic location or region, assets that the playback device is incapable of playing back including (but to limited to) streams encoded in unsupported formats or using profiles and/or buffer sizes that are not supported by the playback device, or assets that the playback device is not securely capable of playing back (e.g. the playback device has an unencrypted digital output and a content provider is not willing to allow high definition content to be streamed to such a device). Assets that a user may not wish to playback include (but is not limited to) content in a language that is not relevant to a specific user, video assets having an aspect ratio that is not the same as the display aspect ratio of the playback device (where video assets are associated with the content that have the same aspect ratio as the device's display aspect ratio), content encoded at a resolution beyond the resolution of the playback device's display, and/or content encoded at a maximum bitrate exceeding the maximum data rate of the playback device's network connection. Although specific filters are discussed above, the criteria utilized by a playback server to filter (98) the initial list of assets to generate a list of assets for inclusion in a top level index file are only limited by the requirements of a specific adaptive bitrate streaming system.
Once filtering has been applied to the list of assets, a filtered list of assets can be returned (100) and used to generate a top level index file. In the illustrated embodiment, the filtered list of assets corresponds to the content streams that the playback server is permitting the playback device to access.
Although a specific process is illustrated in
Generating a Top Level Index SMIL File
In a number of embodiments, the top level index file generated by a playback server in response to a request from a playback device is a SMIL file, which is an XML file that includes a list of URIs describing each of the streams and the container files that contain the streams. The URI can include information such as the “system-bitrate” of the stream contained within the stream and information concerning the location of specific pieces of data within the container file.
The basic structure of a SMIL file involves providing an XML declaration and a SMIL element. The SMIL element defines the streams or assets available for by the playback device and includes a HEAD element, which is typically left empty and a BODY element that typically only contains a PAR (parallel) element. The PAR element describes streams that can be played simultaneously (i.e. include media that can be presented at the same time).
The SMIL specification defines a number of child elements to the PAR element that can be utilized to specify the streams available for use in adaptive bitrate streaming. The VIDEO, AUDIO and TEXTSTREAM elements can be utilized to define a specific video, audio or subtitle stream. The VIDEO, AUDIO and TEXTSTREAM elements can collectively be referred to as media objects. The basic attributes of a media object are the SRC attribute, which specifies the full path or a URI to a container file containing the relevant stream, and the XML:LANG attribute, which includes a 3 letter language code. Additional information concerning a media object can be specified using the PARAM element. The PARAM element is a standard way within the SMIL format for providing a general name value pair. In a number of embodiments of the invention, specific PARAM elements are defined that are utilized during adaptive bitrate streaming.
In many embodiments, a “header-request” PARAM element is defined that specifies the size of the header section of the container file containing the stream. The value of the “header-request” PARAM element typically specifies the number of bytes between the start of the file and the start of the encoded media within the file. In many embodiments, the header contains information concerning the manner in which the media is encoded and a playback device retrieves the header prior to playback of the encoded media in order to be able to configure the decoder for playback of the encoded media. An example of a “header-request” PARAM element is as follows:
In a number of embodiments, a “mime” PARAM element is defined that specifies the MIME type of the stream. A “mime” PARAM element that identifies the stream as being an H.264 stream (i.e. a stream encoded in accordance with the MPEG-4 Advanced Video Codec standard) is as follows:
The MIME type of the stream can be specified using a “mime” PARAM element as appropriate to the encoding of a specific stream (e.g. AAC audio or UTF-8 text stream).
When the media object is a VIDEO element, additional attributes are defined within the SMIL file format specification including the systemBitrate attribute, which specifies the bitrate of the stream in the container file identified by the VIDEO element, and width and height attributes, which specify the dimensions of the encoded video in pixels. Additional attributes can also be defined using the PARAM element. In several embodiments, a “vbv” PARAM element is defined that specified the VBV buffer size of the video stream in bytes. The video buffering verifier (VBV) is a theoretical MPEG video buffer model used to ensure that an encoded video stream can be correctly buffered and played back at the decoder device. An example of a “vbv” PARAM element that specifies a VBV size of 1000 bytes is as follows:
An example of VIDEO element including the attributes discussed above is as follows:
Adaptive bitrate streaming systems in accordance with embodiments of the invention can support trick play streams, which can be used to provide smooth visual search through source content encoded for adaptive bitrate streaming. A trick play stream can be encoded that appears to be an accelerated visual search through the source media when played back, when in reality the trick play stream is simply a separate track encoding the source media at a lower frame rate. In many embodiments of the system, a VIDEO element that references a trick play track is indicated by the systemBaseProfile attribute of the VIDEO element. In other embodiments, any of a variety of techniques can be utilized to signify within the top level index file that a specific stream is a trick play stream. An example of a trick play stream VIDEO element in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is as follows:
In a number of embodiments of the invention, a “reservedBandwidth” PARAM element can be defined for an AUDIO element. The “reservedBandwidth” PARAM element specifies the bitrate of the audio stream in Kbps. An example of an AUDIO element specified in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is as follows:
In several embodiments, the “reservedBandwidth” PARAM element is also defined for a TEXTSTREAM element. An example of a TEXTSTREAM element including a “reservedBandwidth” PARAM element in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is as follows:
In other embodiments, any of a variety of mechanisms can be utilized to specify information concerning VIDEO, AUDIO, and SUBTITLE elements as appropriate to specific applications.
A SWITCH element is a mechanism defined within the SMIL file format specification that can be utilized to define adaptive or alternative streams. An example of the manner in which a SWITCH element can be utilized to specify alternative video streams at different bitrates is as follows:
The SWTICH element specifies the URLs of three alternative video streams. The file names indicate that the different bitrates of each of the streams. As is discussed further below, the SMIL file format specification provides mechanisms that can be utilized in accordance with embodiments of the invention to specify within the top level index SMIL file additional information concerning a stream and the container file in which it is contained.
In many embodiments of the invention, the EXCL (exclusive) element is used to define alternative tracks that do not adapt during playback with streaming conditions. For example, the EXCL element can be used to define alternative audio tracks or alternative subtitle tracks. An example of the manner in which an EXCL element can be utilized to specify alternative English and French audio streams is as follows:
An example of a top level index SMIL file that defines the attributes and parameters of two alternative video levels, an audio stream and a subtitle stream in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is as follows:
When the playback device receives a top level index SMIL file, the playback device can parse the SMIL file to identify the available streams. The playback device can then select initial stream and can use the SMIL file to identify the portions of the container file to download to obtain information concerning the encoding of a specific stream and/or to obtain an index to the encoded media within the container file.
A process for building a top level index SMIL file in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
An assetID is assigned to audio and text streams to uniquely identify the stream. This value is passed up to the server so the server knows the exact audio, subtitle stream being played.
Although top level index SMIL files are described above, any of a variety of top level index file formats can be utilized to automatically create top level index files for a specific playback device as appropriate to a specific application in accordance with embodiments of the invention. The use of top level index files to enable playback of encoded media using adaptive bitrate streaming in accordance with embodiments of the invention is discussed further below.
Protected Streams
Some or all of the assets associated with a specific piece of content may be encrypted or technically protected. Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems enable the communication of cryptographic information to playback devices so that the playback device can access protected streams in the clear (i.e. in an unencrypted form). DRM systems that can be utilized in adaptive bitrate streaming systems in accordance with embodiments of the invention are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/340,623. In many embodiments, the playback server acts as a DRM server. In several embodiments, the playback server is configured to obtain cryptographic information from the playback server.
A process for providing cryptographic information to a playback device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments, the playback device includes cryptographic information that is locally stored on the playback device. The device cryptographic information is typically issued to the playback device at the time the playback device is first registered with the playback server and/or a DRM server. In several embodiments, the content cryptographic information provided to the playback device is encrypted so that it can be accessed using the playback device's device cryptographic information. In other embodiments, any of a variety of different techniques can be utilized to securely provide the playback device with cryptographic information to access protected streams.
Although a specific process for providing cryptographic information to a playback device in
Play Event Reports
Playback devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention can generate play event reports periodically and/or in response to specific events such as (but not limited to) receipt of user instructions (e.g. play, stop, pause commands). The information that can be included in an event report typically includes the streams being accessed by the playback device and the current playback location in one or more of the streams. In several embodiments, the event report includes (but is not limited to) the time, the audio, and/or subtitle assetIDs, and/or a bandwidth measurement. The playback location can be utilized to resume playback of the content. The server can utilize play events to perform a variety of functions including (but not limited to) enabling playback to shift from one device to another device. When a user commences playing content on a first device and then commences playback of the same content on a second device, the playback server can provide the second playback device with the current playback location from the most recent play event report from the first device. The second playback device can then use the playback location information to resume playback of the content. In this way, the user can seamlessly transition from viewing content on a first playback device to a second playback device.
A process for handling play event reports in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Although a specific process for handling play event reports is illustrated in
Communicating During Adaptive Streaming
Processes are described above for automatically generating a top level index file in response to a request to access content from a playback device. A timing diagram illustrating communication between a playback device, a playback server, and a content delivery network during the adaptive bitrate streaming of content in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
Although a specific sequence of communication is illustrated in
Although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described, including various changes in the implementation such as utilizing encoders and decoders that support features beyond those specified within a particular standard with which they comply, without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/703,668, entitled “Systems, Methods, And Media for Playing Back Protected Video Content By Using Top Level Index File” to Braness et al., filed Dec. 4, 2019, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/207,405, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Generating Top Level Index Files” to Braness et al., filed Dec. 3, 2018 and issued on Jan. 21, 2020 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,542,061, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/658,057, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Generating Top Level Index Files” to Braness et al., filed Jul. 24, 2017 and issued on Dec. 11, 2018 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,154,075, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/009,593, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Generating Top Level Index Files” to Braness et al., filed Jan. 28, 2016 and issued on Jun. 12, 2018 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,998,515, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/336,392, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Generating Top Level Index Files” to Braness et al., filed Jul. 21, 2014 and issued on Feb. 23, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,720, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/341,789, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Generating Top Level Index Files” to Braness et al., filed Dec. 30, 2011 and issued on Jul. 22, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,787,570, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/529,403, entitled “Automatic Generation of SMIL Files” to Braness et al., filed Aug. 31, 2011, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3609227 | Kuljian | Sep 1971 | A |
4694491 | Horne et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5132992 | Yurt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5341474 | Gelman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5400401 | Wasilewski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5477263 | Ocallaghan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5544318 | Schmitz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550863 | Yurt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5574785 | Ueno et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5600721 | Kitazato | Feb 1997 | A |
5614940 | Cobbley et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621794 | Matsuda et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630005 | Ort | May 1997 | A |
5642338 | Fukushima et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5761417 | Henley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805700 | Nardone et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813010 | Kurano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828370 | Moeller et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838791 | Torii et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852664 | Iverson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854873 | Mori et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874986 | Gibbon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878135 | Blatter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892915 | Duso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907658 | Murase et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923869 | Kashiwagi et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5973679 | Abbott et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002834 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009237 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016381 | Taira et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038316 | Dwork et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6057832 | Lev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065050 | DeMoney | May 2000 | A |
6108422 | Newby et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151634 | Glaser et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154172 | Piccionelli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154173 | Lennen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6199107 | Dujari | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263313 | Milsted et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266483 | Okada et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282320 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320905 | Konstantinides | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347145 | Kato et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6351538 | Uz | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373803 | Ando et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6389473 | Carmel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389538 | Gruse et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398245 | Gruse et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415031 | Colligan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445877 | Okada et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453115 | Boyle | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453116 | Ando et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504873 | Vehvilaeinen | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512883 | Shim et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516064 | Osawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535920 | Parry et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6578200 | Takao et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587837 | Spagna et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594699 | Sahai et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6654933 | Abbott et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671408 | Kaku | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690838 | Zhou | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6721794 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724944 | Kalevo et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6741252 | Hijiri et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6742082 | Lango et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6751623 | Basso et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6810131 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813437 | Ando et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6859791 | Spagna et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868143 | Menon et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871006 | Oguz et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6912513 | Candelore | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6931531 | Takahashi | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931543 | Pang et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6957350 | Demos | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959288 | Medina et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965646 | Firestone | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970564 | Kubota et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6983079 | Kim | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006757 | Ando et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007170 | Morten | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020287 | Unger | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023992 | Kubota et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7043021 | Graunke et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051110 | Hagai et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058177 | Trimberger et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073191 | Srikantan et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103906 | Katz et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110542 | Tripathy | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120250 | Candelore | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124303 | Candelore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139868 | Parry et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143289 | Denning et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7151832 | Fetkovich et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7167560 | Yu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7177818 | Nair | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188183 | Paul et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7203313 | England et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212726 | Zetts | May 2007 | B2 |
7231516 | Sparrell et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233669 | Candelore | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233948 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7242772 | Tehranchi | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7274861 | Yahata et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7295673 | Grab et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295752 | Jain et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7302490 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315829 | Tagawa et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7346163 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349886 | Morten et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349976 | Glaser et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7352956 | Winter et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363647 | Fakharzadeh | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7376233 | Candelore et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7382879 | Miller | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7397853 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400679 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406176 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418132 | Hoshuyama | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7443449 | Momosaki et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457415 | Reitmeier et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7499930 | Naka et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539213 | Guillemot et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7546641 | Robert et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577980 | Kienzle et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7623759 | Shimoda | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624337 | Sull et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627750 | Chan | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7627888 | Ganesan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639921 | Seo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640358 | Deshpande | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640435 | Morten | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644172 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653686 | Yoneda | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7664262 | Haruki | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664872 | Osborne et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697686 | Puiatti et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702925 | Hanko et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711052 | Hannuksela et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7734806 | Park | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756270 | Shimosato et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756271 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787622 | Sprunk | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7797720 | Gopalakrishnan et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7818444 | Brueck et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7840693 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853980 | Pedlow, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864186 | Robotham et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877002 | Ikeda et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881478 | Derouet | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885405 | Bong | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7895311 | Juenger | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7907833 | Lee | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925203 | Lane | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945143 | Yahata et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962942 | Craner | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7970835 | St Jacques | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974714 | Hoffberg | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001471 | Shaver et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015491 | Shaver et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8073900 | Guedalia et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8074083 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8078644 | Hannuksela | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8131875 | Chen | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135041 | Ramaswamy | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8148622 | Rothkopf et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160157 | Lamy-Bergot et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169916 | Pai et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8170210 | Manders et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8171518 | White | May 2012 | B2 |
8191097 | Armstrong et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8213607 | Rose et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8213768 | Morioka et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8218439 | Deshpande | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8243924 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266115 | Park | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8286213 | Seo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290157 | Candelore | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311094 | Kamariotis et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8312079 | Newsome et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8365235 | Hunt et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369421 | Kadono et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380041 | Barton et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8397265 | Henocq et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401188 | Swaminathan | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8402156 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407753 | Kuo | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8423889 | Zagorie et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8472792 | Butt et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8514926 | Ro et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526610 | Shamoon et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543842 | Ginter et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8555329 | Frojdh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571993 | Kocher et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8630419 | Mori | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631247 | O'loughlin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638935 | Fasoli et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8649669 | Braness et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8650599 | Shindo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677428 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683066 | Hurst et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8725125 | Klappert et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731193 | Farkash et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731369 | Li et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8782268 | Pyle et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787570 | Braness et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804956 | Hiriart | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8806188 | Braness et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8818896 | Candelore | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819116 | Tomay et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8819577 | Fino | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8849950 | Stockhammer et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850205 | Choi et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850498 | Roach et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8856847 | Soroushian | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8909682 | Heller et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8909922 | Kiefer et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914534 | Braness et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918533 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918535 | Ma et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8964977 | Ziskind | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9009491 | Resch | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015782 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9037683 | Yoden | May 2015 | B1 |
9038116 | Knox et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9038121 | Kienzle et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9092646 | Grab et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9111098 | Smith et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9161005 | Rose et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9191151 | Luby et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9247311 | Kiefer | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9270720 | Braness et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9380096 | Luby et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9380099 | Amidei et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9386064 | Luby et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9485469 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507776 | Bartholomew | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9615061 | Carney et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9628536 | Luby et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9661044 | Arana et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9674254 | Pare et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9761274 | Delpuch et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9967521 | Kahn et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9998515 | Braness et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10154075 | Braness et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10171873 | Krebs | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10225298 | Cen et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10542061 | Braness et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10623458 | Cen et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
11115450 | Braness et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11349892 | Cen et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
20010021276 | Zhou | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010052077 | Fung et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052127 | Seo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053222 | Wakao et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020048450 | Zetts | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020067432 | Kondo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075572 | Boreczky et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107802 | Philips | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114330 | Cheung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020135607 | Kato et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141503 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154779 | Asano et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161797 | Gallo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164024 | Arakawa et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169926 | Pinckney et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169971 | Asano et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002577 | Pinder | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043847 | Haddad | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044080 | Frishman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051237 | Sako et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030053541 | Sun et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061369 | Aksu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063675 | Kang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077071 | Lin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078930 | Surcouf et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079222 | Boykin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081776 | Candelore | May 2003 | A1 |
20030135633 | Dror et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135742 | Evans | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142594 | Tsumagari et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152224 | Candelore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030206717 | Yogeshwar et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225696 | Niwa | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236907 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001594 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003008 | Wasilewski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022391 | Obrien | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028227 | Yu | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037421 | Truman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047592 | Seo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040047607 | Seo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049690 | Candelore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049694 | Candelore | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073917 | Pedlow et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076237 | Kadono et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081333 | Grab et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088557 | Malcolm et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093494 | Nishimoto et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101059 | Joch et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101142 | Nasypny | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107356 | Shamoon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040213094 | Suzuki | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243714 | Wynn et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267952 | He et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005025 | Harville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050005143 | Lang et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050013494 | Srinivasan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050063541 | Candelore | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066063 | Grigorovitch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076232 | Kawaguchi | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102371 | Aksu | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120132 | Hutter | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138655 | Zimler et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144468 | Northcutt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177741 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190911 | Pare et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192904 | Candelore | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195975 | Kawakita | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198364 | Val et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207442 | Zoest et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207578 | Matsuyama et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216752 | Hofmeyr et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227773 | Lu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243912 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262257 | Major et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265555 | Pippuri | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013568 | Rodriguez | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015580 | Gabriel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026654 | An et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037057 | Xu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060093318 | Cohen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095472 | Krikorian et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060109856 | Deshpande | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129909 | Butt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165163 | Burazerovic et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168298 | Aoki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060210245 | Mccrossan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212370 | Shear et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218251 | Tanabe | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235883 | Krebs | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070044010 | Sull et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047645 | Takashima | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055982 | Spilo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067472 | Maertens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074254 | Sloo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083467 | Lindahl et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106863 | Bonwick et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157267 | Lopez-Estrada | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162568 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162981 | Morioka et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070166000 | Nallur et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180051 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201502 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204003 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204011 | Shaver et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204115 | Abramson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070220118 | Loyer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250536 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080008455 | De Lange et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022005 | Wu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040239 | Jacobi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080086570 | Dey et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101718 | Yang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080137847 | Candelore et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155615 | Craner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160911 | Chou et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168516 | Flick et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177793 | Epstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080282302 | Steelberg et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294901 | Farrugia | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301734 | Goldeen et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320100 | Pantos et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010429 | Kim et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010622 | Yahata et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090013195 | Ochi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090067367 | Buracchini et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077143 | Macy, Jr. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106082 | Senti et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132599 | Soroushian et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090169001 | Tighe et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177301 | Hayes | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178090 | Oztaskent | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187957 | Avkarogullari | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090249081 | Zayas | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282162 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310819 | Hatano | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100057576 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100142915 | Mcdermott et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185854 | Burns et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191590 | Hakkarainen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198943 | Harrang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100250772 | Mao | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110010466 | Fan et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035517 | Minnick et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110058675 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082924 | Gopalakrishnan | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110083009 | Shamoon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110093447 | Goto | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096828 | Chen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103374 | Lajoie et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116772 | Kwon | May 2011 | A1 |
20110135090 | Chan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145858 | Philpott et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158470 | Martin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170687 | Hyodo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173345 | Knox et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179185 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179356 | Bassali | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110103364 | Thorwirth | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110197261 | Dong et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110231569 | Luby et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238789 | Luby et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246661 | Manzari et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276676 | Kang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296048 | Knox et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314130 | Strasman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005312 | Mcgowan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005313 | McGowan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120042090 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047542 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054856 | Johansson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059912 | Fernando | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110120 | Willig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134496 | Farkash et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137015 | Sun | May 2012 | A1 |
20120167132 | Mathews et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170642 | Braness et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173751 | Braness et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185608 | McGowan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209961 | McCoy et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120254456 | Visharam et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120303766 | McGowan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311174 | Bichot et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120331167 | Hunt | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006869 | Grab et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007200 | van der Schaar et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007223 | Luby et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013803 | Bichot et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018632 | Field | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051554 | Braness et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054958 | Braness et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054972 | Thorwirth | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058480 | Ziskind et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130061045 | Kiefer et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080267 | McGowan | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080596 | McGowan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080772 | McGowan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130081110 | McGowan et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130179199 | Ziskind et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130254346 | McGowan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130318249 | McDonough et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140003516 | Soroushian | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140068264 | Lindquist | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140140253 | Lohmar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149557 | Lohmar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140223303 | Cox et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140280750 | Panje et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140359075 | Amidei et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006662 | Braness | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019550 | Maharajh et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019866 | Braness et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150139419 | Kiefer et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150288530 | Oyman | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160164939 | Braness et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160197971 | Cen et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160323342 | Luby et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170011055 | Pitts | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170250882 | Kellicker | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170324793 | Braness et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180046949 | Kahn et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180255366 | Lockett et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180262813 | Moorthy | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190173932 | Braness et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190268394 | Cen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200106820 | Braness et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200244714 | Cen et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20220368749 | Cen et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2237293 | Jul 1997 | CA |
1551631 | Dec 2004 | CN |
101861583 | Oct 2010 | CN |
103999033 | Aug 2014 | CN |
103999033 | Aug 2016 | CN |
106254900 | Dec 2016 | CN |
107111477 | Aug 2017 | CN |
106254900 | Sep 2019 | CN |
107111477 | May 2021 | CN |
113259731 | Aug 2021 | CN |
1158799 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1453319 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1536646 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1283640 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2180664 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2360923 | Aug 2011 | EP |
3243130 | Nov 2017 | EP |
3243130 | Aug 2019 | EP |
3570520 | Nov 2019 | EP |
3570520 | Feb 2021 | EP |
3910904 | Nov 2021 | EP |
2398210 | Aug 2004 | GB |
1197306 | Jan 2015 | HK |
1229978 | Nov 2017 | HK |
1242001 | Jun 2018 | HK |
1246429 | Sep 2018 | HK |
1246429 | Apr 2020 | HK |
40013764 | Aug 2020 | HK |
1229978 | Jun 2021 | HK |
2005015935 | Feb 2005 | IE |
H07143475 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H1175178 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2001204001 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2004350043 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005107725 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005173241 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005284041 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2008507160 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009188690 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009225116 | Oct 2009 | JP |
4516082 | May 2010 | JP |
2011087103 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2011087165 | Apr 2011 | JP |
2011204001 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2013509818 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2014506430 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014528376 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2014529967 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2016036161 | Mar 2016 | JP |
6076347 | Feb 2017 | JP |
6254987 | Dec 2017 | JP |
2018-505594 | Feb 2018 | JP |
2018064287 | Apr 2018 | JP |
6522723 | May 2019 | JP |
2019134487 | Aug 2019 | JP |
2020141415 | Sep 2020 | JP |
6944371 | Sep 2021 | JP |
6967189 | Oct 2021 | JP |
2022000992 | Jan 2022 | JP |
2022132649 | Sep 2022 | JP |
20040039852 | May 2004 | KR |
20060030164 | Apr 2006 | KR |
20060106250 | Oct 2006 | KR |
20060116967 | Nov 2006 | KR |
20070020727 | Feb 2007 | KR |
20090016282 | Feb 2009 | KR |
1020100082182 | Jul 2010 | KR |
1020140062479 | May 2014 | KR |
1020170103863 | Sep 2017 | KR |
10-1903352 | Sep 2018 | KR |
1955363 | Feb 2019 | KR |
101955363 | Mar 2019 | KR |
10-2012682 | Aug 2019 | KR |
10-2166291 | Oct 2020 | KR |
10-2323520 | Nov 2021 | KR |
10-2395874 | May 2022 | KR |
2328040 | Jun 2008 | RU |
199800973 | Jan 1998 | WO |
199834405 | Aug 1998 | WO |
1998047290 | Oct 1998 | WO |
2000049762 | Aug 2000 | WO |
2000049763 | Aug 2000 | WO |
200223315 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2003028293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
2002035832 | May 2002 | WO |
2002054776 | Jul 2002 | WO |
2002073437 | Sep 2002 | WO |
2002087241 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2003046750 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003047262 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2003061173 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2004012378 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004100158 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005008385 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005015935 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005057906 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005111835 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005125214 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006019490 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007072257 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007093923 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007101182 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008032908 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009006302 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2005111835 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009109976 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010079950 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011038013 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011053658 | May 2011 | WO |
2011087449 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011101371 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011103364 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012094171 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2013032517 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013101841 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2016112112 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21158343.0, Search completed Sep. 30, 2021, dated Oct. 11, 2021, 10 Pgs. |
Bertazzo et al., “L2L (Live to e-Learning): Building a Consortium-Wide Lecture Capture and Delivery Service Using a Digital Asset Management Platform”, IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=& arnumber=5693873 (Year: 2010). |
Oliveira et al., “Dynamic Generation of FMIL-Based Multimedia Interfaces”, Journal of Multimedia, Oct. 2008, vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 14-25. |
Pathan, “Cloud-Based Content Delivery and Streaming”, Advanced Content Delivery, Streaming, and Cloud Services Publisher: Wiley-IEEE Press. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileNanne=7777615.pdf&bkn=7748400&pdfType=chapter (Year: 2014). |
International Standard, Information technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information: Systems, ISO/IEC 13818-1:2000(E), Dec. 1, 2000 174 pgs. (presented in 2 parts). |
Decision Granting Petitioner's Request on Rehearing 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d) Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, IPR2020-00614 U.S. Pat. No. 7,295,673, 29 pgs. |
Declaration of Dr. Clifford Reader, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,720, 158 pgs, IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Declaration of Dr. Clifford Reader, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,998,515, 184 pgs, IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Defendant Hulu, LLC's Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,295,673; 8,139,651; 8,472,792; 9,270,720; 9,998,515; 10,212,486; 10,225,588, DIVX, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, Case No. 2:19-cv-1606-PSG-DFMx, C.D. Cal., Apr. 2, 2020, 136 pgs. |
Defendant Netflix, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,295,673; 8,139,651; 8,472,792; 9,270,720; 9,998,515; 10,212,486; 10,225,588 9,184,920, DIVX, LLC v. Netflix, Inc., Case No. 2:19-cv-1602-PSG-DFM, C.D. Cal., Apr. 2, 2020, 148 pgs. |
Excerpt from DivX Infringement Contentions in U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,720 Patent (re Hulu), IPR2020-00647 filed Mar. 11, 2020, 8 pgs. |
Excerpt from DivX Infringement Contentions in U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,720 Patent (re Netflix), IPR2020-00647 filed Mar. 11, 2020, 1 page. |
Excerpts from DivX's Contentions to Hulu, U.S. Pat. No. 9,998,515, IPR2020-00648, filed Mar. 11, 2020, 5 pgs. |
Excerpts from DivX's Contentions to Netflix, U.S. Pat. No. 9,998,515, IPR2020-00648, filed Mar. 11, 2020, 26 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16735361.4, Search completed Jul. 10, 2018, dated Jul. 18, 2018 8 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19185179.9, Search completed Jul. 26, 2019, dated Aug. 5, 2019, 10 Pgs. |
Information Technology—MPEG Systems Technologies—Part 7: Common Encryption in ISO Base Media File Format Files (ISO/IEC 23001-7), Apr. 2015, 24 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/068274, International Filing Date Dec. 31, 2011, dated Mar. 4, 2014, 13 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application PCT/US2016/012348 Report dated Jul. 11, 2017, dated Jul. 20, 2017 7 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2016/012348, completed Feb. 11, 2016, dated Mar. 4, 2016, 8 Pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2011/68274, Report Completed Apr. 10, 2012, 16 pgs. |
ISO/IEC 14496-12 Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects—Part 12: ISO base media file format, Feb. 2004 (“MPEG-4 Part 12 Standard”), 62 pgs. |
ISO/IEC 14496-12:2008(E) Informational Technology—Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Part 12: ISO Base Media File Format, Oct. 2008, 120 pgs. |
ISO/IEC FCD 23001-6 MPEG systems technologies Part 6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Jan. 28, 2011, 86 pgs. |
Microsoft Corporation, Advanced Systems Format (ASF) Specification, Revision 01.20.03, Dec. 2004, 121 pgs. |
MPEG-DASH presentation at Streaming Media West 2011, Nov. 2011, 14 pgs. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,720, IPR2020-00647, 82 pgs., IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 9,998,515, IPR2020-00648, 85 pgs., IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Pomelo, LLC Tech Memo, Analysis of Netflix's Security Framework for ‘Watch Instantly’ Service, Mar.-Apr. 2009, 18 pgs. |
Power of Attorney—Hulu, LLC, (IPR2020-00647), 4 pgs., IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Power of Attorney—Hulu, LLC, (IPR2020-00648), 4 pgs., IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Power of Attorney—Netflix, Inc. (IPR2020-00647), 4 pgs., IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Power of Attorney—Netflix, Inc. (IPR2020-00648), 4 pgs., IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020. |
Prosecution File History for U.S. Pat. No. 9,270,720, IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020, 350 pgs. |
Prosecution File History for U.S. Pat. No. 9,998,515, IPR filed Mar. 11, 2020, 1189 pgs., presented in four parts. |
Server-Side Stream Repackaging (Streaming Video Technologies Panorama, Part 2), Jul. 2011, 15 pgs. |
Text of ISO/IEC 23001-6: Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH), Oct. 2010, 71 pgs. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), ETSI TS 126 233 V9.1.0 (Jun. 2011) 3GPP TS 26.233 version 9.1.0 Release 9, 18 pgs. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); ETSI TS 126 244 V9.4.0 (May 2011) 3GPP TS 26.244 version 9.4.0 Release 9, 58 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/409,285 (Puneet), filed Aug. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/522,623 (Willig), filed Nov. 2, 2010. |
“Apple HTTP Live Streaming specification”, Aug. 2017, 60 pgs. |
“Broadcom BCM7413 Product Brief”, Dec. 11, 2008, 2 pgs. |
“Common Interface Specification for Conditional Access and other Digital Video Broadcasting Decoder Applications”, European Standard, EN 50221, Feb. 1997, 86 pgs. |
“Data Encryption Decryption using AES Algorithm, Key and Salt with Java Cryptography Extension”, Available at https://www.digizol.com/2009/10/java-encrypt-decrypt-jce-salt.html, October 200, 6 pgs. |
“Delivering Live and On-Demand Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, 2009, 28 pgs. |
“H.264—A Complete Guide to the Video Codec”, May 2003, Retrieved from https://www.encoding.com/h-264/, 2 pgs. |
“HTTP Based Adaptive Streaming over HSPA”, Apr. 2011, 73 pgs. |
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Mar. 2011, 24 pgs. |
“HTTP Live Streaming”, Sep. 2011, 33 pgs. |
“Information technology—Dynamic adaptive streaming for HTTP (DASH); Part 1: Media presentation and description and segment formats”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 23009-1, Second edition May 15, 2014, 152 pgs. |
“Information Technology—Coding of Audio Visual Objects—Part 2: Visual”, International Standard, ISO/IEC 14496-2, Third Edition, Jun. 1, 2004, pp. 1-724. (presented in three parts). |
“Java Cryptography Architecture API Specification & Reference”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html, Jul. 25, 2004, 68 pgs. |
“Java Cryptography Extension, javax.crypto.Cipher class”, Available at https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/javax/crypto/Cipher.html, 2004, 24 pgs. |
“JCE Encryption—Data Encryption Standard (DES) Tutorial”, Available at https://mkyong.com/java/jce-encryption-data-encryption-standard-des-tutorial/, Feb. 25, 2009, 2 pgs. |
“LINK UP Inc”, Imasugu tsukaeru kantan (ready-to-use and easy) PLUS+ Google sabisu kanzendaijiten (complete dictionary of Google service), Gijutsu-Hyohron Co., Ltd., Oct. 25, 2014, the first edition, the first impression, p. 226, 228, 233, 238, 239, 242, 243, 244. |
“Live and On-Demand Video with Silverlight and IIS Smooth Streaming”, Microsoft Silverlight, Windows Server Internet Information Services 7.0, Feb. 2010, 15 pgs. |
“Microsoft Smooth Streaming specification”, Jul. 22, 2013, 56 pgs. |
“MPEG-2, Part 1, ISO/IEC 13818-1”, Information technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio: Systems, 161 pgs., Nov. 13, 1994. |
“MPEG-4, Part 14, ISO/IEC 14496-14”, Information technology—Coding of audio-visual objects, 18 pgs., Nov. 15, 2003. |
“OpenDML AVI File Format Extensions Version 1.02”, OpenDMLAVI MJPEG File Format Subcommittee. Last revision: Feb. 28, 1996. Reformatting: Sep. 1997, 42 pgs. |
“Server ‘Trick Play’ support for MPEG-2 Transport Stream Files”, www.live555.com/liveMedia/transport-stream-trick-play.html, 2006, Dec. 31, 2020, 1 pg. |
“Single-Encode Streaming for Multiple Screen Delivery”, Telestream Wowza Media Systems, 2009, 6 pgs. |
“Sustainability of Digital Formats: Planning for Library of Congress Collections”, H.262 MPEG-2 Video Encoding (H.262), 7 pgs. |
“Sustainability of Digital Formats: Planning for Library of Congress Collections”, MPEG-4, Visual Coding (Part 2), (Last Updated: Feb. 21, 2017), 6 pgs. |
“The LIVE555 Media Server”, www.live555.com/mediaServer/#about, 2006, printed Dec. 31, 2020, 3 pgs. |
“The MPEG-DASH Standard for Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 18, No. 4, 2011, 7 pgs. |
“Window Microsoft codecs”, 2017, Retrieved from https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ff819508(v=vs.85).aspx, 7 pgs. |
“Windows Media Player 9”, Microsoft, Mar. 23, 2017, 3 pgs. |
Abomhara et al., “Enhancing Selective Encryption for H.264/AVC Using Advanced Encryption Standard”, International Journal of computer Theory and Engineering, Apr. 2010, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-229. |
ADB, “ADB-3800W Datasheet”, 2007, 2 pgs. |
Agi et al., “An Empirical Study of Secure MPEG Video Transmissions”, IEEE, Mar. 1996, 8 pgs., DOI: 10.1109/NDSS.1996.492420. |
Ahmed et al., “An Efficient Chaos-Based Feedback Stream Cipher (ECBFSC) for Image Encryption and Decryption”, Informatica, Mar. 2007, vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 121-129. |
Alattar et al., A.M. “Improved selective encryption techniques for secure transmission of MPEG video bit-streams”, In Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348), vol. 4, IEEE, 1999, pp. 256-260. |
Antoniou et al., “Adaptive Methods for the Transmission of Video Streams in Wireless Networks”, 2015, 50 pgs. |
Apostolopoulos et al., “Secure Media Streaming and Secure Transcoding”, Multimedia Security Technologies for Digital Rights Management, 2006, 33 pgs. |
Arachchi et al., “Adaptation-aware encryption of scalable H.264/AVC for content security”, Signal Processing: Image Communication, Jul. 2009, vol. 24, pp. 468-483, doi:10.1016/j.image.2009.02.004. |
Asai et al., “Essential Factors for Full-Interactive VOD Server: Video File System, Disk Scheduling, Network”, Proceedings of Globecom '95, Nov. 14-16, 1995, 6 pgs. |
Beker et al., “Cipher Systems, The Protection of Communications”, 1982, 40 pgs. |
Bocharov et al., “Portable Encoding of Audio-Video Objects, The Protected Interoperable File Format (PIFF)”, Microsoft Corporation, First Edition Sep. 8, 2009, 30 pgs. |
Bulterman et al., “Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0)”, W3C Recommendation, Dec. 1, 2008, https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SMIL3-20081201/, 321 pgs. (presented in five parts). |
Caglar et al., “MUVIS: A Content-Based Multimedia Indexing and Retrieval Framework”, 2003 Proceedings of Seventh International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, Jul. 4, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 1-8, DOI: 10.1109/ISSPA.2003.1224626. |
Cahill et al., “Locally Adaptive Deblocking Filter for Low Bit Rate Video”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4 pgs. |
Candelore, U.S. Appl. No. 60/372,901, filed Apr. 17, 2002. |
Chaddha et al., “A Frame-work for Live Multicast of Video Streams over the Internet”, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 19, 1996, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 pgs. |
Chen et al., “A Spatio-Temporal Semantic Model for Multimedia Database Systems and Multimedia Information Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Jul./Aug. 2011, vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 607-622, DOI: 10.1109/69.940735. |
Chen et al., “Audio-on-Demand over Wireless Sensor Networks”, 2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service, Jun. 4-5, 2012, pp. 1-9, DOI: 10.1109/IWQoS.2012.6245981. |
Cheng, “Partial Encryption for Image and Video Communication”, Thesis, Fall 1998, 95 pgs. |
Cheng et al., “Partial encryption of compressed images and videos”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 48, No. 8, Aug. 2000, 33 pgs. |
Cheung et al., “On the Use of Destination Set Grouping to Improve Fairness in Multicast Video Distribution”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'96, Conference on Computer Communications, vol. 2, IEEE, 1996, 23 pgs. |
Collet, “Delivering Protected Content, An Approach for Next Generation Mobile Technologies”, Thesis, 2010, 84 pgs. |
Conklin et al., “Video coding for streaming media delivery on the Internet”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Mar. 2001, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 269-281. |
Deshpande et al., “Scalable Streaming of JPEG2000 Images Using Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, Multimedia '01: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Oct. 2001, pp. 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1145/500141.500197. |
Diamantis et al., “Real Time Video Distribution using Publication through a Database”, Proceedings SIBGRAPI'98. International Symposium on Computer Graphics, Image Processing, and Vision (Cat. No.98EX237), Oct. 1990, 8 pgs. |
Ding et al., “Multisource Video On-Demand Streaming in Wireless Mesh Networks”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Dec. 2012, Date of Publication: Mar. 7, 2012, vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 1800-1813, DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2012.2188642. |
Dworkin, “Recommendation for Block Cipher Modes of Operation: Methods and Techniques”, NIST Special Publication 800-38A, 2001, 66 pgs. |
Entone, “Amulet High Definition IP Television Receiver User's Guide”, 2008, 28 pgs. |
Entone, “Hydra HD IP Video Gateway”, 2008, 2 pgs. |
ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) Support for use of scrambling and Conditional Access (CA) within digital broadcasting systems”, Oct. 1996, 13 pgs. |
ETSI, “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Implementation guidelines for the use of Video and Audio Coding in Contribution and Primary Distribution Applications based on the MPEG-2 Transport Stream”, ETSI TS 102 154 V1.2.1, May 2004, 73 pgs. |
Fahmi et al., “Proxy Servers for Scalable Interactive Video Support”, Computer, Sep. 2001, vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 54-60, https://doi.org/10.1109/2.947092. |
Fang et al., “Real-time deblocking filter for MPEG-4 systems”, Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Oct. 28-31, 2002, Bail, Indonesia, pp. 541-544. |
Fecheyr-Lippens, “A Review of HTTP Live Streaming”, Jan. 2010, 38 pgs. |
Fielding et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP1.1”, Network Working Group, RFC 2616, Jun. 1999, 114 pgs. |
Fitzek et al., “A Prefetching Protocol for Continuous Media Streaming in Wireless Environments”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Oct. 2001, vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 2015-2028, DOI: 10.1109/49.957315. |
Fukuda et al., “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts by Adaptive DCT Coefficient Estimation in Block-Based Video Coding”, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, Sep. 10-13, 2000, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 969-972. |
Guo et al., “A Multi-server Video Monitor System Based on Stream-Media Communication Technology”, 2008 2nd International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics, Dec. 10-12, 2008, Shenzhen, China, pp. 1-4, DOI: 10.1109/ISSCAA.2008.4776278. |
Ho, “Digital Video Broadcasting Conditional Access Architecture”, Report prepared for CS265—Section 2, Fall 2002, Prof Stamp, 7 pgs. |
Huang, U.S. Pat. No. 7,729,426, U.S. Appl. No. 11/230,794, filed Sep. 20, 2005, 143 pgs. |
Huang et al., “Adaptive MLP post-processing for block-based coded images”, IEEE Proceedings—Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 5, Oct. 2000, pp. 463-473. |
Huang et al., “Architecture Design for Deblocking Filter in H.264/JVT/AVC”, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo., Jul. 6-9, 2003, Baltimore, MD, 4 pgs. |
INCITS/ISO/IEC, “Information Technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Information: Video (Formerly ANSI/ISO/IEC 13818-2-2000)”, Second edition, Dec. 15, 2000, 220 pgs., (presented in two parts). |
Islam, “A HTTP Streaming Video Server with Dynamic Advertisement Splicing”, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), School of Information and Communication Technology, Master of Science Thesis, Mar. 21, 2010, Retrieved from: https://people.kth.se/˜maguire/DEGREE-PROJECT-REPORTS/100409-Md._Safiqul_Islam-with-cover.pdf, 108 pgs. |
ISMA, “ISMA Encryption and Authentication, Version 1.1, AREA / Task Force: DRM”, Internet Streaming Media Alliance, Sep. 15, 2006, pp. 1-64. |
ITU-T, “Series J: Cable Networks and Transmission of Television, Sound Programme and Other Multimedia Signals”, Technical method for ensuring privacy in long-distance international MPEG-2 television transmission conforming to Itu-T J.89, ITU-T Recommendation J.96, Mar. 2001, 34 pgs. |
Jain et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/522,623, filed Aug. 11, 2011. |
Jung et al., “Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Personal Video Recorder for DTV”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 47, No. 4, Nov. 2001, 6 pgs. |
Kabir, “Scalable and Interactive Multimedia Streaming Over the Internet”, Thesis, 2005, 207 pgs. |
Kalva, Hari “Delivering MPEG-4 Based Audio-Visual Services”, 2001, 113 pgs. |
Kang et al., “Access Emulation and Buffering Techniques for Steaming of Non- Stream Format Video Files”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 43, No. 3, Aug. 2001, 7 pgs. |
Kim et al., “A Deblocking Filter with Two Separate Modes in Block-Based Video Coding”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 9, No. 1, 1999, pp. 156-160. |
Kim et al., “Tree-Based Group Key Agreement”, Feb. 2004, 37 pgs. |
Krikor et al., “Image Encryption Using DCT and Stream Cipher”, European Journal of Scientific Research, Jan. 2009, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 48-58. |
Laukens, “Adaptive Streaming—A Brief Tutorial”, EBU Technical Review, 2011, 6 pgs. |
Legault et al., “Professional Video Under 32-bit Windows Operating Systems”, SMPTE Journal, vol. 105, No. 12, Dec. 1996, 10 pgs. |
Li et al., “Layered Video Multicast with Retransmission (LVMR): Evaluation of Hierarchical Rate Control”, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century, Cat. No. 98, vol. 3, 1998, 26 pgs. |
Lian et al., “Recent Advances in Multimedia Information System Security”, Informatica, Jan. 2009, vol. 33, pp. 3-24. |
Lian et al., “Selective Video Encryption Based on Advanced Video Coding”, PCM, Nov. 2005, Part II, LNCS 3768, pp. 281-290. |
Lievaart, “Characteristics that differentiate CA Systems”, Irdeto access, Nov. 2001, 5 pgs. |
List et al., “Adaptive deblocking filter”, IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 2003, pp. 614-619. |
Lloyd, “Supporting Trick Mode Playback Universally Across the Digital Television Industry”, Thesis, 2005, 111 pgs. |
Macaulay et al., “Whitepaper—IP Streaming of MPEG-4: Native RTP vs MPEG-2 Transport Stream”, Envivio, Oct. 2005, 12 pgs. |
Martin et al., “Privacy Protected Surveillance Using Secure Visual Object Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Aug. 2008, vol. 18, No. 8, pp. 1152-1162, DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2008.927110. |
Massoudi et al., “Overview on Selective Encryption of Image and Video Challenges and Perspectives”, EURASIP Journal on Information Security, Nov. 2008, 18 pgs. |
Mccanne et al., “Receiver-driven Layered Multicast”, Conference proceedings on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, Aug. 1996, 14 pgs. |
Meier, “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts in Image and Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 3, Apr. 1999, pp. 490-500. |
Meyer et al., “Security mechanisms for Multimedia-Data with the Example MPEG-I-Video”, SECMPEG, 1992, 10 pgs. |
Miras, “On Quality Aware Adaptation of Internet Video”, University of London, PhD dissertation, May 2004, 181 pgs. |
Molavi et al., “A Security Study of Digital TV Distribution Systems”, Thesis, Jun. 2005, 112 pgs. |
Nelson, “Smooth Streaming Deployment Guide”, Microsoft Expression Encoder, Aug. 2010, 66 pgs. |
Nelson, “The Data Compression Book”, M&T Publishing, 1992, 533 pgs., (presented in two parts). |
Newton et al., “Preserving Privacy by De-identifying Facial Images”, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, Technical Report, CMU-CS-03-119, Mar. 2003, 26 pgs. |
O'Brien, U.S. Appl. No. 60/399,846, filed Jul. 30, 2002. |
OIPF Open Forum, “OIPF Release 1 Specification, vol. 3, Content Metadata”, OIPF, Oct. 8, 2009, vol. 1.1, 47 pgs. |
OIPF Open Forum, “OIPF Release 1 Specification, vol. 7—Authentication, Content Protection and Service Protection”, OIPF, Oct. 8, 2009, vol. 1.1, 88 pgs. |
Open IPTV Forum, “Functional Architecture”, Jan. 16, 2008, vol. 1.1, 141 pgs. |
Open IPTV Forum, “Oipf Release 1 Specification, vol. 1—Overview”, OIPF, Oct. 8, 2009, vol. 1.1, 48 pgs. |
Open IPTV Forum, “OIPF Release 1 Specification, vol. 2, Media Formats”, OIPF, Oct. 8, 2009, vol. 1.1, 22 pgs. |
O'Rourke, “Improved Image Decompression for Reduced Transform Coding Artifacts”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 5, No. 6, Dec. 1995, pp. 490-499. |
Padiadpu, Rashmi “Towards Mobile Learning: A SCORM Player for the Google Android Platform”, Master Thesis, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 2008, 66 pgs. |
Park et al., “A postprocessing method for reducing quantization effects in low bit-rate moving picture coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 161-171. |
Park et al., “An Efficient Encryption and Key Management Scheme for Layered Access Control of H.265/Scalable Video Coding”, IEICI Trans. Inf. & Syst., May 2009, vol. E92-D, No. 5, pp. 851-858, DOI: 1031587/transinf.E92.D.851. |
Park et al., “Combined Scheme of Encryption and Watermarking in H.264/Scalable Video Coding”, New Directions in Intelligent Interactive Multimedia, SCI 142, 2008, pp. 351-361. |
Paul et al., “VTonDemand: A Framework for Indexing, Searching, and On-Demand Playback of RTP-Based Multimedia Conferences”, 1999 IEEE Third Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (Cat. No. 99th8451), Sep. 13-15, 1999, pp. 59-64, DOI: 10.1109/MMSP.1999.793798. |
Qiao et al., “Comparison of MPEG Encryption Algorithms”, Comput. & Graphics, 1998, vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 437-448. |
Raju et al., “Fast and Secure Real-Time Video Encryption”, Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, Jan. 2009, pp. 257-264, doi:10.1109/ACVGIP.2008.100. |
Richardson, “H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression”, Wiley, 2003, 306 pgs. (presented in 2 parts). |
Senoh et al., “DRM Renewability & Interoperability”, IEEE Xplore, Conference: Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2004, Feb. 2004, pp. 424-429, DOI: 10.1109/CCNC.2004.1286899. |
Shah et al., “Localising Peers in P2P Live Streaming Systems Within Resource-Constrained Networks”, 2012 International Conference on Computer&Information Science (ICCIS), Year. 2012, pp. 683-688, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6297115. |
Shojania et al., “Experiences with MPEG-4 Multimedia Streaming”, CiteSeer, Jan. 2001, 3 pgs., DOI: 10.1145/500141.500221. |
Sima et al., “An Efficient Architecture for Adaptive Deblocking Filter of H.264 AVC Video Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 50, No. 1, Feb. 2004, pp. 292-296. |
Spanos et al., “Performance Study of a Selective Encryption Scheme for the Security of Networked, Real-Time Video”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, IC3N'95, Sep. 20-23, 1995, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 2-10. |
Srinivasan et al., “Windows Media Video 9: overview and applications”, Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2004, 25 pgs. |
Stockhammer, “Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP—Standards and Design Principles”, Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia, Feb. 2011, pp. 133-145. |
Symes, “Video Compression Demystified”, McGraw-Hill, 2001, 353 pgs., (presented in two parts). |
Taymans et al., “GStreamer Application Development Manual (1.6.0)”, 2007, 159 pgs. |
Thomas et al., “A Novel Secure H.264 Transcoder Using Selective Encryption”, Proceedings in International Conference on Image Processing, Jan. 2007, vol. 4, pp. IV-85-IV-88, DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2007.4379960. |
Timmerer et al., “HTTP Streaming of MPEG Media”, Proceedings of Streaming Day, 2010, 4 pgs. |
Tiphaigne et al., “A Video Package for Torch”, Jun. 2004, 46 pgs. |
Toldo et al., “A Resilent and Low-Delay P2P Streaming System Based on Network Coding with Random Multicast Trees”, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Year. 2010, pp. 400-405. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5662054. |
Tosun et al., “Efficient multi-layer coding and encryption of MPEG video streams”, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No. 00TH8532), Jul. 30-Aug. 2, 2000, pp. 119-122, DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2000.869559. |
Trappe et al., “Key Management and Distribution for Secure Multimedia Multicast”, IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 4, Dec. 2003, pp. 544-557. |
Um, “Selective Video Encryption of Distributed Video Coded Bitstreams and Multicast Security over Wireless Networks”, Thesis, Aug. 2006, 142 pgs. |
Van Deursen et al., “On Media Delivery Protocols in the Web”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, Jul. 19-23, 2010, 6 pgs. |
Ventura, Guillermo Albaida “Streaming of Multimedia Learning Objects”, AG Integrated Communication System, Mar. 2003, 101 pgs. |
Waggoner, “Compression for Great Digital Video”, 2002, 184 pgs. |
Wang, “Lightweight Encryption in Multimedia”, Thesis, Jun. 2005, 184 pgs. |
Watanabem et al., “MPEG-2 decoder enables DTV trick plays”, esearcher System LSI Development Lab, Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., Kawasaki, Japan, Jun. 2001, 2 pgs. |
Wei, “Pardon Our Dust”, Hulu Blog, printed Apr. 30, 2014 from http://blog.hulu.com.2010/05/13/pardon-our-dust, 10 pgs. |
Wiegand, “Joint Video Team (JVT) of ISO/IEC MPEG and ITU-T VCEG”, Jan. 2002, 70 pgs. |
Willig et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/409,285, filed Nov. 2, 2010. |
Wong, “Web Client Programming with Perl”, 1997, printed Jan. 8, 2021 from: https://www.oreilly.com/openbook-webclientch03.html, 31 pgs. |
Wowza Media Systems, “Using dynamically generated SMIL file possible:”, printed Apr. 30, 2014 from http://www.wowza.com.forums/showthread.php?12458-using-dynamically-generated-SMIL-file-possible, 3 pgs. |
Wu, “A Fast MPEG Encryption Algorithm and Implementation of AES on CAM”, Thesis, Oct. 6, 2003, 91 pgs. |
Yang et al., “Projection-Based Spatially Adaptive Reconstruction of Block-Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 896-908. |
Yang et al., “Regularized Reconstruction to Reduce Blocking Artifacts of Block Discrete Cosine Transform Compressed Images”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 3, No. 6, Dec. 1993, pp. 421-432. |
Yu et al., “Video deblocking with fine-grained scalable complexity for embedded mobile computing”, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2004, pp. 1173-1178. |
Yuksel, “Partial Encryption of Video for Communication and Storage”, Thesis, Sep. 2003, 78 pgs. |
Zakhor, “Iterative Procedures for Reduction of Blocking Effects in Transform Image Coding”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1992, pp. 91-95. |
Inamura et al., “Implementation and Evaluation of Illegal Copy Protection for Multicast Contents Delivery”, Information Processing Society of Japan Report, Jul. 21, 2004, 2004-CSEC-26, vol. 2004 No. 75,pp. 135-142. |
Liu et al., “Streaming Media Delivery with Proxy Cache for Heterogeneous Clients”, IEEE 7th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4014003, 2005. |
Wu et al., “A Scalable to Lossless Audio Streaming System Applicable to Mobile Devices”, 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5975666, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220239717 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61529403 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16703668 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17467027 | US | |
Parent | 16207405 | Dec 2018 | US |
Child | 16703668 | US | |
Parent | 15658057 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16207405 | US | |
Parent | 15009593 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15658057 | US | |
Parent | 14336392 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 15009593 | US | |
Parent | 13341789 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14336392 | US |