Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to information aggregation systems and, more particularly, to systems and methods for browsing aggregated historical content.
Description of Related Art
Existing news aggregation services (e.g., Google News) search out, and aggregate, news content published on web pages throughout the Internet. These news aggregation services then aggregate the news from thousands of news sources in real time and provide them to users that access news content via the news aggregation service. When using these news aggregation services, recent news articles (e.g., news articles from the past 3 days) are grouped together to form news clusters representing a single “news story” in the news. Specifically, the news clusters are scored based on recency, size, and geographical and topical preferences.
In response to a search query from a user, or when a user browses a newspaper section of the news aggregation service, clusters of news items that match the search query are ranked based on a match between the search query and the clusters of news items and a recency and size associated with the news clusters to produce a relevant and high quality ranking. Based on the ranking, the news aggregation service may present a list of stories, from the aggregated news content, to the user, with each story involving a group of articles from different publications dealing with the same topic. Users may periodically access the news aggregation service to re-enter a search query and view relevant news stories to keep abreast of developments in the news. News article lists that are displayed as a result of the existing news content searching and ranking processes tend to be unwieldy, with, possibly, up to hundreds of news articles being contained in the list. Existing news article lists, thus, can make it difficult for a news browser to ascertain, in an easy fashion, how a news story develops over time.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to implement a news browsing service that enables news browsers to quickly and easily ascertain the progression of one or more news stories over time.
Systems and methods, consistent with the principles of the invention, implement a news browsing service that may provide news documents, in response to news search queries, that can graphically plot the progression of one or more news stories over time. The news documents may include a graphical user interface that displays plots of new stories versus time, and permits news browsers to select specific news articles or news clusters from the plotted news stories to view the associated news content.
According to one aspect consistent with the principles of the invention, a method of plotting one or more sequences of articles with respect to time is provided. The method may include receiving one or more search queries, wherein data including a time period is associated with at least one of the one or more search queries. The method may further include executing the one or more search queries to search content that was published within the time period and receiving results of the one or more executed search queries. The method may also include providing a document that plots one or more sequences of articles, with respect to time, corresponding to the results of the one or more executed search queries.
According to another aspect, a method of graphically plotting articles is provided. The method includes executing one or more search queries to search stored articles and receiving results of the executed one or more search queries, wherein the results identify selected articles of the stored articles. The method further includes designating a graphical marker for each of the selected articles and plotting each of the graphical markers on a graphical display.
According to a further aspect, a method of plotting one or more sequences of articles is provided. The method may include identifying a time period and determining one or more sequences of articles from a corpus of articles that were available within the identified time period. The method may further include plotting, in a multi-dimensional graph, the one or more sequences of the available news articles
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate an embodiment of the invention and, together with the description, explain the invention. In the drawings,
The following detailed description of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawings may identify the same or similar elements. Also, the following detailed description does not limit the invention.
Systems and methods consistent with the principles of the invention implement a news browsing service that plots the progression of one or more news stories over time via, for example, a graphical user interface. Consistent with one implementation of the invention, the graphical user interface may display historical news documents that may plot new stories over time and permit news browsers to select specific news articles from the plotted news stories.
A “document,” or “article,” as the term is used herein is to be broadly interpreted to include any machine-readable and machine-storable work product. A document or article may include an e-mail, a web site, a file, a combination of files, one or more files with embedded links to other files, a news group posting, a blog, a web advertisement, etc. In the context of the Internet, a common document or article is a web page. Web pages often include textual information and may include embedded information (such as meta information, images, hyperlinks, etc.) and/or embedded instructions (such as Javascript, etc.).
Clients 110 may include client entities. An entity may be defined as a device, such as a wireless telephone, a personal computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a laptop, or another type of computation or communication device, a thread or process running on one of these devices, and/or an object executable by one of these devices. Servers 120-130 may include server entities that gather, process, search, and/or maintain documents in a manner consistent with the principles of the invention. Clients 110 and servers 120-130 may connect to network 140 via wired, wireless, and/or optical connections.
In an implementation consistent with the principles of the invention, server 120 may include a search engine 125 usable by users at clients 110. Server 120 may implement a news aggregation service by crawling a corpus of news content documents (e.g., web pages) hosted on news source server(s) 130 and store information associated with these news content documents in a repository of crawled documents. The news aggregation service may be implemented in other ways, such as by agreement with the news services to distribute their news articles to the news aggregation service. Server 120 may additionally provide graphical displays of historical news stories that are relevant to one or more news search queries received from clients 110. The graphical displays may plot historical news stories, in multiple dimensions, as a function of time over a time window specified by users associated with clients 110. Server(s) 130 may store or maintain news content documents that may be crawled by server 120. Such news content documents may include recently published news stories, or older (i.e., not recent), archived news stories. Such news content documents may include news from any type of news source, such as, for example, the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, or Newsweek.
While servers 120-130 are shown as separate entities, it may be possible for one or more of servers 120-130 to perform one or more of the functions of another one or more of servers 120-130. For example, it may be possible that two or more of servers 120-130 are implemented as a single server. It may also be possible for a single one of servers 120-130 to be implemented as two or more separate (and possibly distributed) devices.
Processor 220 may include logic that, in some implementations, may further include one or more types of conventional processors or microprocessors that interpret and execute instructions. Main memory 230 may include a random access memory (RAM) or another type of dynamic storage device that stores information and instructions for execution by processor 220. ROM 240 may include a conventional ROM device or another type of static storage device that stores static information and instructions for use by processor 220. Storage device 250 may include a magnetic and/or optical recording medium and its corresponding drive.
Input device(s) 260 may include one or more conventional mechanisms that permit an operator to input information to the client/server entity, such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, voice recognition and/or biometric mechanisms, etc. Output device(s) 270 may include one or more conventional mechanisms that output information to the operator, including a display, a printer, a speaker, etc. Communication interface 280 may include any transceiver-like mechanism that enables the client/server entity to communicate with other devices and/or systems. For example, communication interface 280 may include mechanisms for communicating with another device or system via a network, such as network 140.
As will be described in detail below, the client/server entity, consistent with the principles of the invention, performs certain searching-related operations. The client/server entity may perform these operations in response to processor 220 executing software instructions contained in a computer-readable medium, such as memory 230. A computer-readable medium may be defined as one or more physical or logical memory devices and/or carrier waves.
The software instructions may be read into memory 230 from another computer-readable medium, such as data storage device 250, or from another device via communication interface 280. The software instructions contained in memory 230 may cause processor 220 to perform processes that will be described later. Alternatively, hardwired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement processes consistent with the principles of the invention. Thus, implementations consistent with the principles of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
Processing may begin with server 120 accessing external news sources (e.g., from server 130), fetching the news content stored at the news sources and aggregating the fetched news content in memory, such as, for example, a local memory (act 305)(
Server 120 may then receive one or more news search queries from a user at client 110 (act 315). Each of the one or more news search queries may include a time window that specifies a time period over which a respective search query should be searched. A number of search queries may be supported by server 120, including (but not limited to) the following search query forms: (a) one or more keywords (e.g., ‘bush,’ ‘bush iraq,’ etc.); (b) topical categories (e.g., ‘topic=sports,’ ‘topic=sport-basketball’; (c) geographical categories (e.g., ‘geo=usa,’ ‘geo=north america,’ ‘geo=china’); (d) geographical reporting areas (e.g., U.S. newspapers, European newspapers, etc.); (e) restrictions on the news sources to be considered (e.g., a list of news sources to be searched, a list of news sources not to be searched); and/or (g) a time window that defines a start and end of a time interval from which articles may be retrieved. A search query may additionally include any combination of the above forms of search query.
In one implementation of the invention, as shown in
Server 120, using search engine 125, may execute the one or more news search queries (act 325). The results of the executed news search queries may be merged based on scores computed by search engine 125. The results of the executed news search queries may also be clustered based on a date and/or content associated with news articles that resulted from the news search queries. The results of the executed news search queries may be provided to the user as a news historical graph document (act 330)(
In one implementation consistent with the invention, graphs from two or more distinct news search queries may be combined to see how two sets of events are related. For example, a search query related to the Iraq war can be graphed along with a search query related to business activity to visually depict how the Iraq war affected business activity. In other implementations consistent with the invention, other events of interest can be plotted on the same news historical graph as the one showing news articles to detect correlations between news and other events. For example, events of interest, such as stock market activity, prices of commodities, health statistics, etc. may be plotted on the same news historical graph as news articles.
In the news historical graph document, original stories may be marked in a certain way (e.g., an icon of a certain color or shape). Duplicate stories, breaking news, editorials, op-eds, wire stories, and stories from news sources preferred by the user may each be marked in specific and different ways. For example, each of the different types of stories may be marked in different colors, or icons of different shapes. Those skilled in the art may combine icons, dots, characters and colors and sizes in various ways to indicate all the interesting features of a news cluster.
In the news historical graph document, the density of clustering may be managed depending on the resolution of the displayed plot. The resolution may, for example, be adjusted, such as by a user using standard graphical user interface devices (e.g., slider knobs, +1- or zoom buttons, etc.). For example, at a coarse setting, very large news clusters may be shown. At a finer setting, large news clusters may decompose into finer clusters showing more detail. Graphically, when the displayed plot is changed from coarse news clusters to finer news clusters, a single long horizontal line may decompose into many shorter horizontal lines on distinct y coordinates. Related news clusters may be shown adjacently in the y-axis. For example, all cycling stores may occupy a range of y-coordinates. In some embodiments, a third dimension may be employed, such that, for example, the cycling stories may occupy a y-plane but have different z-coordinates.
If a news story splits into many related but distinct news stories, then the split may be rendered by arrows pointing from a first news cluster to multiple news clusters. For example, the start of the Iraq war could be one story (Cluster 0) that splits into three news clusters: (1) cluster 1 that includes events in Iraq; (2) cluster 2 that includes reaction from around the world; and (3) cluster 3 that includes reaction within the U.S. Splitting of the first news cluster into related but distinct news stories may, thus, permit an analysis of the genesis of a story. As an illustrative example, news historical graph document 500 of
Similarly, if many seemingly disconnected events come together, then smaller news clusters may merge into a large news cluster. This may be rendered in the news historical graph document by multiple arrows converging from multiple news clusters to a single news cluster. For example, many election related news clusters about individual election campaigns may converge into a single news cluster about the actual election when election day comes. As an illustrative example, news historical graph document 500 of
If, for example, the user is using a “mouse” as an interface, moving the mouse over a target (e.g., a dot, icon, or character) corresponding to an article within a news cluster may cause the display of the contents of the article, or the display of at least a portion of the contents of the article (e.g., title, summary), either in a “popup” window, in a separate frame, or in an area of the existing window. A different action, such as, for example, “clicking” on a target (e.g., a dot, icon, or character) corresponding to an article may cause the entire contents of the article to be shown. Additionally, selecting (e.g., “clicking”) a news cluster may cause a listing of the entire news cluster to be depicted graphically. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a user may “draw” a box within the news historical graph (e.g., “click” and drag a cursor over a span of the graph) to restrict the span of the graph in time, or topics, and show more detail. Conversely, the span of the news historical graph may be expanded to hide detail, but cover a larger range of topics or temporal behavior.
Server 120 may determine whether a user selects a news article or news cluster from the provided news historical graph (act 335). If not, processing may continue at act 360 below (see
Server 120 may access external newspaper sources (e.g., news source server 130), fetch updated news content and aggregate the updated news content in local memory (act 360). For example, server 120 may use a news crawler (e.g., web robot) that may access updated news content documents hosted by news source server(s) 130. The fetched updated news content may be indexed and grouped, using conventional indexing and grouping algorithms (act 365). Server 120 may then execute the previously stored one or more news search queries (act 370). Server 120 may, optionally, use the results of the executed one or more news search queries to update the news historical graph document previously provided to the user (act 380)(
Systems and methods consistent with the principles of the invention enable a news browser to plot the progression of one or more news stories over time. In some implementations consistent with the invention, a graphical user interface may be used to display historical news documents that plot new stories over time and permit news browsers to select news articles from the plotted news stories to view the associated news content.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the present invention provides illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. For example, while series of acts have been described with regard to
It will also be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that aspects of the invention, as described above, may be implemented in many different forms of software, firmware, and hardware in the implementations illustrated in the figures. The actual software code or specialized control hardware used to implement aspects consistent with the principles of the invention is not limiting of the present invention. Thus, the operation and behavior of the aspects of the invention were described without reference to the specific software code—it being understood that one of ordinary skill in the art would be able to design software and control hardware to implement the aspects based on the description herein.
Further, certain portions of the invention have been described as “logic” that performs one or more functions. This logic may include hardware, such as an application specific integrated circuit or a field programmable gate array, software, or a combination of hardware and software.
The scope of the invention is defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/013,602 filed Aug. 29, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/411,045 filed Mar. 2, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,975), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/813,586 filed Mar. 31, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,131,702). These applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5412769 | Maruoka | May 1995 | A |
5414838 | Kolton | May 1995 | A |
5819032 | De Vries et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6012044 | Maggioncalda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020898 | Saito et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023280 | Becker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026187 | Siegel | Feb 2000 | A |
6041331 | Weiner | Mar 2000 | A |
6057839 | Advani et al. | May 2000 | A |
6151600 | Dedrick | Nov 2000 | A |
6222540 | Sacerdoti | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222547 | Schwuttke et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236987 | Horowitz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6275229 | Weiner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6473084 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6553373 | Boguraev et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6574632 | Fox et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6754906 | Finseth | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6829599 | Chidlovskii | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6904427 | Hagiwara et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6961954 | Maybury | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6990633 | Miyasaka | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7171619 | Bianco | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7292245 | Goggin | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7844517 | Willen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7904327 | Phelan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8131702 | Bharat et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8269774 | Buck | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8521663 | Phillips | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8548975 | Bharat et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8725726 | Page | May 2014 | B1 |
8775406 | Gross | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9141703 | Bharat et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
20020103787 | Goel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105532 | Oblinger | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107842 | Biebesheimer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133385 | Fox et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149614 | Biebesheimer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030074391 | Carter | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110120 | Salehi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030160815 | Muschetto | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040027349 | Landau | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040059705 | Wittke et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040143796 | Lerner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153456 | Charnock | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040177149 | Zullo et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194034 | Vlamis | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040217884 | Samadani | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050069225 | Schneider | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071766 | Brill et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091337 | Reasor et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091591 | Boguraev et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091596 | Anthony et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050097081 | Sellen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144096 | Caramanna, II | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060123033 | Livshits | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070168413 | Barletta | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080065510 | Yu | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091656 | Charnock et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080201159 | Gabrick et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080301013 | Markowski et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090089254 | Von Kaenel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138826 | Barros | May 2009 | A1 |
20090326926 | Landau | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14013602 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14839025 | US | |
Parent | 13411045 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14013602 | US | |
Parent | 10813586 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 13411045 | US |