This invention relates to collision avoidance systems, and more specifically, to systems and methods for collision avoidance between aircraft and ground-based service equipment.
Passenger aircraft generally require the performance of a variety of different tasks following the termination of a specific flight. Typically, the aircraft must be refueled, cargo must be unloaded, the cabin of the aircraft must be cleaned, the lavatory wastewater must be removed, and the galley must be re-provisioned, among other tasks. Consequently, during the performance of various ground service operations, a plurality of service vehicles may be maneuvering and/or positioned about the aircraft. A risk therefore exists that a service vehicle may inadvertently collide with a portion of the aircraft while moving about the aircraft. Such a collision may result in significant damage to the aircraft, requiring a costly and time-consuming repair before the aircraft is returned to service.
Since non-metallic composite components are increasingly replacing conventional metallic structures on passenger aircraft in order to reduce weight, the likelihood that significant damage may result from a ground service vehicle collision has accordingly increased. Moreover, selected portions of the aircraft are particularly susceptible to damage while the aircraft is positioned on the ground. For example, landing gear doors, cargo loading doors and passenger access doors are generally maintained in an open position during ground operations, and may be relatively easily damaged by even a minor collision. Even in cases where damage to the aircraft is less significant, relatively expensive flight delays are often incurred since a mandated inspection of the damaged area must be performed to determine if the damage is within allowable limits.
One conventional method of reducing the possibility of undesirable collisions is to increase the minimum clearance criteria around the aircraft for vehicle maneuver. For example,
A conventional minimum clearance 116 between the wing 108 of an aircraft 100 and a galley truck 120 maneuvering behind it to dock at the left rear door 110 of the aircraft 100 is presently 3 feet. Due to the increased costs associated with the repair of composite wing structures, however, a conventional approach to reducing the possibility of collision is to increase this minimum clearance, for example, to 5 feet. Unfortunately, merely increasing the minimum clearance criteria around the aircraft may lead to additional difficulties and expense, and may render some equipment and facilities unusable. For example, door 110 may become out of reach by the second galley truck 120 approaching it from behind the wing trailing edge. Accordingly, improved systems and methods for reducing the possibility of collision between a ground service vehicle and an aircraft without increasing the minimum clearance criteria would be beneficial.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods for collision avoidance between aircraft and ground-based service equipment. Embodiments of apparatus and methods in accordance with the present invention may advantageously reduce the possibility of collision between a ground service vehicle and an aircraft without increasing the minimum clearance criteria, thereby reducing costs associated with repairs and enabling the use of conventional ground-based servicing equipment and facilities. Thus, embodiments of the present invention allow a door, such as galley door 110 shown in
In one embodiment, a method of reducing a likelihood of a collision between an aircraft and a ground-based device includes providing a proximity warning system operatively coupled to the aircraft and adapted to monitor a scanning area proximate a selected portion of the aircraft. The method further includes monitoring the scanning area using the proximity warning system, and moving the ground-based device into the scanning area. The ground-based device is detected within the scanning area using the proximity warning system, and a distance between the ground-based device and the selected portion on the aircraft is determined using the proximity warning system. If the distance between the ground-based device and the selected portion falls below a selected minimum distance, then a warning signal is provided. In alternate embodiments, the proximity warning systems includes a laser scanning system, a laser radar system, a laser-based imaging system, a laser radar system, an infrared global positioning system, and a laser-based point tracking system
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
The present invention relates to systems and methods for collision avoidance between aircraft and ground-based service equipment. Many specific details of certain embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following description and in
Generally, embodiments of systems and methods in accordance with the present invention may accurately measure the clearance between a moving service vehicle or other ground-based equipment and an aircraft stationed on the ground, and may assist an operator of the ground-based equipment with maintaining a minimum clearance and avoiding a collision with the aircraft. In one particular embodiment, when the critical clearance (e.g. 3 feet) is reached, a system in accordance with the invention will warn the operator that the minimum clearance has been reached.
Although the collision avoidance systems 200 are depicted in the embodiment shown in
The aircraft 300 shown in
With reference to
For example, in one embodiment, the warning indicator 208 provides a flashing light that begins when the object 216 is determined to be at a first selected distance (e.g. 3 feet) from the reference point, and provides a constant light when the object 216 reaches a second selected distance (e.g. 2 feet) from the reference point. In various embodiments, the reference point may be a location on one of the propulsion units 302, on the trailing edge of the wing 304, or any other desired portion of the aircraft 300. Thus, when the warning indicator 208 is flashing, the operator of a ground-based service vehicle or other apparatus operating in proximity to the aircraft 300 will be alerted to the fact that they are operating within the first selected distance from the specified portion of the aircraft 300, and may take extra precautions to avoid a collision.
More specifically, the operator of the passenger loading bridge 114 (
It will be appreciated that the laser scanner 202 (
Embodiments of systems and methods in accordance with the present invention may provide significant advantages over the prior art. For example, because the possibility of collisions between aircraft and ground-based vehicles is reduced, the costs associated with repairs, delayed flights, and dissatisfied customers is reduced. Furthermore, these desired results may be achieved without increasing the minimum clearance criteria around the aircraft, thereby allowing the use of conventional ground-based equipment and facilities.
While preferred and alternate embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited by the disclosure of these preferred and alternate embodiments. Instead, the invention should be determined entirely by reference to the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3814211 | Pamer | Jun 1974 | A |
4931930 | Shyu et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5004997 | Shisgal et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5051815 | Hidaka | Sep 1991 | A |
5291196 | Defour | Mar 1994 | A |
5548515 | Pilley et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5740047 | Pilley et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5793491 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5889479 | Tabel | Mar 1999 | A |
5940012 | Studebaker | Aug 1999 | A |
6118401 | Tognazzini | Sep 2000 | A |
6294985 | Simon | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6405975 | Sankrithi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6462697 | Klamer et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6642839 | Gunderson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
20020105432 | Pederson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030122666 | John et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050285774 | Wittenberg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 690 315 | May 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060007021 A1 | Jan 2006 | US |