This application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/US17/26415 filed Apr. 6, 2017, which is a PCT International Application of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/319,038 filed Apr. 6, 2016. The entire disclosure of the provisional application referenced above is incorporated by reference.
Paved surfaces, such as asphalt and concrete, can accumulate snow and ice in winter weather conditions. Accumulation of snow or ice on paved surfaces can pose hazards for vehicles, pedestrians, and animals. Removal of such accumulation can include mechanical methods, such as plowing, shoveling, auger-based removal (e.g., “snow-blowing”), or the like, and/or chemical methods, such as distributing salts (e.g., sodium chloride (NaCl), calcium chloride (CaCl2), etc.) or other deicing chemicals over the paved surface. However, such methods can involve significant physical or mechanical exertion, pavement deterioration, environmental hazards, or the like.
Systems and methods for providing a conductive concrete slab having protection from one or more of surface current, ground fault current, and/or current leakage are described. A method embodiment includes, but is not limited to, introducing an electrical insulation base layer to a ground surface; introducing a plurality of electrodes to the electrical insulation base layer; and casting conductive concrete over the plurality of electrodes and the electrical insulation base layer. An electrical insulation top layer can also be applied to mitigate one or more of surface current and ground fault current.
A concrete structure embodiment includes, but is not limited to, an electrical insulation base layer. The concrete structure also includes electrodes positioned over a surface of the electrical insulation base layer. The conductive concrete structure also includes a conductive concrete structure positioned over the electrodes and the electrical insulation base layer.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The Detailed Description is described with reference to the accompanying figures. The use of the same reference numbers in different instances in the description and the figures may indicate similar or identical items.
Overview
Conventional concrete is not electrically conductive for practical purposes. For instance, the electrical resistivity of normal weight concrete ranges between 6.54 and 11 kΩ-m. A hydrated concrete consists of pore solution and solids, including aggregates, hydrates and unhydrated cement. The electrical resistivity of the pore solution in cement paste is about 0.25-0.35 Ω-m. Most aggregates (e.g., limestone) used in concrete, with electrical resistivity ranges between 3×102 and 1.5×103 Ω-m, are essentially not conductive. Conductive concrete may be defined as a cement-based admixture, which contains a certain amount of electrically conductive components to attain a stable and relatively high electrical conductivity. Due to the electrical resistance in the conductive concrete mixture, heat is generated when connected to a power source. Some applications currently incorporating conductive concrete include electromagnetic shielding, often required in the design and construction of facilities and equipment to protect electrical systems or electronic components; radiation shielding in the nuclear industry; anti-static flooring in the electronic instrumentation industry and hospitals; and cathodic protection of steel reinforcement in concrete structures. In these applications, conductive concrete is not required to be connected to a power source.
Conductive concrete can also provide deicing properties, such as when the conductive concrete mixture is formed into a slab or other configuration. For instance, the deicing properties can be attributed to the heat generated through electrical resistance of the conductive concrete mixture when power is supplied. Electrodes connected to the power source can be employed within the conductive concrete to facilitate transfer of electricity throughout the slab. Since concrete slabs can be formed on a ground surface, such as on compacted soil or aggregate material, conductive concrete slabs have a natural ground in the ground material or the earth, which can contribute to electrical losses.
For instance, referring to
The surface current relates to a current between two points on a surface of the conductive concrete slab 100. The ground fault current relates to a current between a point on a surface of the conductive concrete slab 100 and a point on a top surface of the ground or material on which the conductive concrete slab 100 is positioned, which may result in system inefficiencies (e.g., reduce the amount of electrical power available to heat the slab). The leakage current relates to a current from the conductive concrete slab (e.g., a bottom portion) to the ground (e.g., back to the power source), where such current leakage can result in system inefficiencies and/or in difficulties in maintaining functionality of the conductive concrete electrical system, particularly where a ground fault current interrupter (GFCI) is utilized (e.g., where an isolation transformer is unfeasible, such as through installation codes, cost, or the like).
Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for providing a conductive concrete slab 100 having protection against one or more of the surface current, ground fault current, and leakage current. In implementations, the conductive concrete slab 100 includes an electrical insulation base layer 108 positioned on a bottom surface 110 of the conductive concrete slab 100 to mitigate current leakage. For example, the electrical insulation base layer 108 can include, but is not limited to, one or more of a polyester sheet, a polystyrene layer, a geotextile containing substantially no carbon black (e.g., a carbon black content sufficient to avoid a conductive geotextile, such that the geotextile is less conductive than the conductive concrete slab; a substantially clear plastic sheet), a grounded wire mesh (e.g., a layer of non-conductive concrete having an embedded wire mesh which is grounded).
The conductive concrete slab 100 can be formed over at least a portion of the electrical insulation base layer 102, such that the conductive concrete slab 100 is cast on the electrical insulation base layer 108 with a plurality of parallel electrodes. In implementations, a conductive concrete slab 100 includes an electrical insulation top layer 112 positioned on a top surface 114 of the conductive concrete slab 100 to mitigate one or more of the surface current and the ground fault current. For example, the electrical insulation top layer 112 can include, but is not limited to, one or more of an epoxy layer, a layer of non-conductive concrete, one or more tiles that comprise marble, granite, ceramics, wood, linoleum, or the like, and/or a grounded wire mesh (e.g., a layer of non-conductive concrete having an embedded wire mesh which is grounded).
Example implementations directed to a conductive concrete slab 100 having protection against one or more of surface current, ground fault current, and current leakage is now provided. In one or more implementations of the present disclosure, the conductive concrete slab 100 may have a conductive characteristic (for example, a measured conductivity) ranging from about five millisiemens per meter (5 mS/m) to about five siemens per meter (5 S/m).
Referring to
For example,
Referring to
The systems and methods for providing a conductive concrete slab having protection from one or more of surface current, ground fault current, and leakage current can be utilized to provide a variety of support surfaces including, but not limited to, walkways, driveways, tile flooring (e.g., conductive concrete tiles having thin metal electrodes disposed therein).
Referring to
The measured ground fault was 690 mA under 120 VAC, with a test geotextile layer present as an electrical insulation base layer. Since the geotextile layer and the concrete base are approximately in series, the total resistance of the two layers would be 120 V/690 mA=174Ω. The resistance of the geotextile layer=174−123=51Ω. This value suggests that the test geotextile is relatively conductive, possibly containing carbon black which is an additive for a polymer matrix used during production to stabilize dimensions of the geotextile (e.g., stabilize the dimensions of the polymers). This finding suggests that a geotextile containing carbon black may not provide a suitable level of electrical insulation for use as an electrical insulation base layer or an electrical insulation top layer.
If the ground fault current is limited to 5 mA under 120 V (e.g., per NEC guidelines), the minimum resistance needed would be 120 V/5 mA=24 kΩ. So, the minimum volume resistivity required would be 24 kΩ×3.726 m2/0.000254 m=352 MΩ-m, with a 10 mil (10 thousandths of an inch) thick plastic sheet for an electrical insulation base layer. (The resistance of the plastic sheet=electric resistivity×thickness/surface area.) Given their relatively high electric volume resistivity values, polyester sheeting and polystyrene (e.g., Styrofoam) can be used as the electrical insulation base layer.
The potential ground fault from the hot electrode through the 8-in. wide and 6.25-in. deep curb is calculated as follows. The resistance would be 6,000 Ω-m×8-in./(76 in.×6.25-in.)=6,000 Ω-m×0.2 m/0.31 m2=3,870Ω. The ground fault current would be 120 V/3,870Ω=30 mA. Therefore, in implementations, it may be necessary to insulate side portions of a conductive concrete form (e.g., side portions of a curb) with electrical insulation, such as the polyester sheet.
In order to eliminate ground fault current, the concrete panel should avoid direct contact with the ground. The stray current can follow a conductive path, even through a small contact area. In implementations, the ground surface can include a regular concrete base (e.g., non-conductive concrete) with an electrical insulation base layer 108 positioned between the regular concrete base and the conductive concrete.
Electrical safety tests were performed to measure surface current, ground fault current, and leakage current (e.g., as shown in
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or process operations, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/026415 | 4/6/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/177044 | 10/12/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2334355 | Russell | Nov 1943 | A |
2726339 | Borst | Dec 1955 | A |
2868659 | Scripture, Jr. | Jan 1959 | A |
3207705 | Hall | Sep 1965 | A |
3309196 | Kaneko | Mar 1967 | A |
3377462 | Pferschy | Apr 1968 | A |
3475304 | Currey | Oct 1969 | A |
3721058 | Dewey, Jr. et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
4174912 | Peterson | Nov 1979 | A |
4656313 | Moore et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4811770 | Rapp | Mar 1989 | A |
4855024 | Drachnik | Aug 1989 | A |
5312526 | Miller | May 1994 | A |
5346547 | McCormack | Sep 1994 | A |
5392580 | Baumann | Feb 1995 | A |
5422174 | Shintani et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
6214454 | Kanda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6461424 | Ramme et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6503318 | Pye et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6821336 | Ramme et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825444 | Tuan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7578881 | Ramme | Aug 2009 | B2 |
8067084 | Yoshikawa et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8617309 | Carney et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8968461 | Tuan et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9278887 | Tuan et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9681592 | Tuan et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20020017466 | Petrenko | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020162484 | Ramme et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20070039277 | Mossbeck | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070186824 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070246857 | Kurtis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20120227630 | Gray | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120324811 | Kawase et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20150361625 | Ciuperca | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160234977 | Tuan et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1552657 | Dec 2004 | CN |
101030454 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101339818 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101891419 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102219447 | Oct 2011 | CN |
102444070 | May 2012 | CN |
102674881 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102869132 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102875090 | Jan 2013 | CN |
H06-240843 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H07157356 | Jun 1995 | JP |
WO-0240799 | May 2002 | WO |
WO-2010059169 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2013096990 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2014184146 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2014210007 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/026415, dated Jul. 11, 2017, 14 pages. |
English Translation of Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2017 from Chinese Patent Office for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480046827.4; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/043875, dated Oct. 14, 2014. |
Cao, Jingyao et al., “Use of fly ash as an admixture for electromagnetic interference shielding”, Cement and Concrete Research, 34 (2004), pp. 1889-1892. |
Yehia, S. et al., “Conductive Concrete for Electromagnetic Shielding Applications”, Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, vol. 3, No. 1, Published May 2, 2014 (Abstract Only). |
Zhang, X. et al., “Electromagnetic shielding and absorption properties of fiber reinforced cementitious composites”, Wuhan Univ. Technology, Material Science Edit. (2012) 27:172 doi: 10.1007/s11595-012-0430-6 (Abstract Only). |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201480046827.4 dated Oct. 10, 2017; 9 pages. |
Construction Methods and Skills of Concrete Engineering Site Construction dated May 31, 2009; 10 pages. |
Calculation of Shielding Effectiveness of Metal Wire Mesh of Cable dated Feb. 28, 2010; 5 pages. |
Electromagnetic shielding concrete and developing trend dated Oct. 31, 2004; 4 pages. |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. 201480046827.4 dated Jul. 9, 2018; 9 pages. |
Yi Yun, et al.; Study on Shielding Effectiveness of Reinforced Concrete Layer to High Power Electromagnetic Environment; Journal of Microwaves; Sep. 30, 2002; 7 pages. |
Ding Shimin; Research on Key Technologies of Electromagnetic Absorbing Concrete Materials; China Doctoral Dissertation Full-Text Database, Engineering Science; May 15, 2012; 45 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/381,876, filed Dec. 16, 2016, Christopher Tuan. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190119864 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62319038 | Apr 2016 | US |