The present invention is directed to the field of prosthetics, and more particularly prosthetic hands. Specifically, the present invention provides systems and methods for controlling a motorized prosthetic hand.
Motorized prosthetic hands are known, in which one or more digits of the hand are each provided with an individual electric motor in order to manipulate the respective digits into desired positions and grips. Each drive motor may be controlled by means of switches which are actuated by known means such as residual digit movement or wrist movement. Alternatively or in addition, control of each digit motor may be by means of pressure sensitive resistors or signals derived from the electromyographic (EMG) activity of residual muscle actions. Whichever control method is used, repeated muscle actions or movements of the wrist or residual digits will result in fatigue and discomfort for the hand wearer after a relatively short period of time.
It is therefore an aim of the present invention to obviate or mitigate this disadvantage with existing systems and methods for controlling prosthetic hands.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method of controlling a prosthetic hand having at least one motorized component, the method comprising the steps of:
The step of storing the at least one manipulation instruction may comprise:
The manipulation of the at least one component in accordance with the manipulation instruction may only take place following an instruction signal sent from the wearer of the hand to the controller.
A plurality of manipulation instructions may be stored and respective codes are assigned to a corresponding plurality of second transceivers, each of the second transceivers is placed at a location at which its assigned manipulation instruction is to be given, and the controller manipulates the at least one component in accordance with the manipulation instruction assigned to a particular second transceiver when that particular second transceiver is within the predetermined distance of the first transceiver.
Alternatively, a pair of sequential manipulation instructions may be stored and a respective pair of codes are assigned to a pair of second transceivers, the pair of second transceivers are placed at locations at which the sequential manipulation instructions are to be given, and the controller manipulates the at least one component in accordance with a first manipulation instruction assigned to a first of the pair of second transceivers when that particular second transceiver is within the predetermined distance of the first transceiver, and the controller manipulates the at least one component in accordance with a second manipulation instruction assigned to a second of the pair of second transceivers when that particular second transceiver is within the predetermined distance of the first transceiver.
The first and second transceivers may be Bluetooth transceivers.
The first transceiver may search for the at least one second transceiver at predetermined time intervals of between 200 ms and 500 ms.
The predetermined distance between the first and second transceivers may be less than or equal to 18 cm.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of controlling a prosthetic hand having at least one motorized component, the method comprising the steps of:
There may be one second transceiver, and the first transceiver communicates to the controller that it is at the location when the first transceiver is within a predetermined distance of the second transceiver.
The predetermined distance between the first and second transceivers may be less than or equal to 18 cm.
Alternatively, there may be three second transceivers which between them define the location, and the first transceiver communicates to the controller that is at the location when the position of the first transceiver is triangulated to the location by the second transceivers.
The first and second transceivers may be Bluetooth transceivers.
The first transceiver may search for the at least one second transceiver at predetermined time intervals of between 200 ms and 500 ms.
According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a system for controlling a prosthetic hand having at least one motorized component, the system comprising:
The operator interface may store at least one manipulation instruction relating to a desired position of the component following the manipulation of the component into the desired position by the wearer of the hand.
The system may further comprise a plurality of second transceivers which are each assigned a code relating to a manipulation instruction by the operator interface and are each located in a location at which each respective manipulation instruction is to be given, and wherein the controller manipulates the at least one component in accordance with the manipulation instruction assigned to a particular second transceiver when that particular second transceiver is within the predetermined distance of the first transceiver.
The first and second transceivers may be Bluetooth transceivers.
The predetermined distance between the first and second transceivers may be less than or equal to 18 cm.
There may be three second transceivers which communicate with the operator interface such that the interface can triangulate the position of the first transceiver.
The operator interface may be a mobile application provided upon a mobile communications device.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The system further comprises an operator interface 18 which is in wireless communication with the first transceiver 10 and hence the controller 12. The operator interface 18 may be a personal computer running a control and set up program for the system, but is preferably a mobile communications device such as a smart phone or tablet which is running a mobile application through which the user sets up and controls the system. The operator interface preferably communicates with the first transceiver via Bluetooth.
Optionally, the system may also comprise one or more input devices 20 which can communicate control signals to the controller 12 in response to inputs from the wearer of the hand. The input device(s) 20 may be switches which are actuated by known means such as residual digit movement or wrist movement. Alternatively or in addition, the input device(s) 20 may be pressure sensitive resistors or other sensors which derive signals from the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the wearer's residual muscle actions.
The hand uses a known drive arrangement in order to manipulate the motorized component(s). An example of one such arrangement which is suited to the purpose is that disclosed in the same applicant's earlier publication WO2007/063266. Further description of the specific drive arrangement will therefore not be provided herein.
The hand 22 is mounted on a base 21 which is attached to the stump of the forearm 26. The hand 22 may be provided with a first wrist motor 27 which rotates the hand relative to the base 21, and/or a second wrist motor 29 which pivots the hand relative to the base 21. Where present, the or each wrist motor 27,29 is connected to the controller 12 so that the controller 12 can control the motor 27,29 in the same manner as it controls the digit motors 14,15.
A mobile communications device in the form of a smart phone provides the operator interface 18. At least one locator 16 is located upon a surface 28 so as to identify a given location to the first transceiver 10. In the illustrated embodiment of
Alternatively, or in addition, one or more of the locators 16 located in the space may be provided in order to establish when the wearer has entered the space rather than to automatically instruct the hand to form a specific grip. For example, in the kitchen shown in
The assignation of the identifier code begins with the operator choosing a particular grip option at step 110. In the illustrated example there are three grip options offered, but the invention is not limited to the specific options listed herein. Instead, there may be at least one grip option provided at step 110. From the three options in the illustrated example, the user can selected from a group of default grips and positions for the components via step 112, a “favorite” subset of the default grips at step 114, or a custom grip created and saved by the user at step 116.
When saving a custom grip, the user accesses a custom grip set up 103 via the settings step 102. From the set up step 103 the user selects a step 105 to set a custom grip. At this point the user manipulates the one or more components of the hand into a desired position using the normal manner in which they control the hand, such as via the control switches or sensors referred to above. The controller receives data back from the or each component motor regarding the run time it took for the motor to put the component in the position desired by the user. The controller then sends this data to the operator interface via the first transceiver so that the positional information may be saved at step 107 in the application as a custom grip. Then, whenever the user wishes to assign a code relating to that saved custom grip to a locator they do so via step 116 of the set up procedure.
Once the user has indicated which grip option they wish to access for the locator being set up, they then select a specific grip or grip subset via the respective selection steps 118,120,122. An identifier code for that specific grip or subset is then assigned and transmitted to the locator. Finally, the set up will ask the user at step 124 if they have finished setting up locators with grip codes. If so, the set up program will terminate at step 126. If not, it returns to locator set up step 104.
The process of
An alternative process is shown in
This alternative process starts at step 300 and its initial steps are identical to those of the process shown in
Unlike with the previous process, the hand does not automatically form grips when employing this alternative process. Instead, the purpose of this process is to still give control of the hand to the wearer, but to reduce the number of grips available from perhaps 30 down to 4-6 which relate to the particular environment which the wearer has entered. Thus at step 308, the process awaits one or more control signals from the wearer to then form at step 310 one of the subset of grips which is selected based upon that signal or signals. The process then stops at step 312 or may loop back to step 304 or 308 as desired.
A modification to the aforementioned process is to use the triangulation arrangement shown in
The present invention provides systems and processes for controlling a prosthetic hand having at least one motorized component, in which repeated muscle actions or movements of the wrist or residual digits by the wearer are not required to control the hand, or are at least very much reduced. Thus, the present invention reduces fatigue and discomfort for the hand wearer caused by frequently having to form grips or manipulate the hand. The present invention can be set up so that the hand automatically forms a given grip or position when placed at a certain location, or else the hand only has access to a small subset of grips when in that location. The former removes the need for the wearer to control the hand at all, whilst the latter significantly reduces the amount of actions or signals which need to be produced by the wearer.
When in the set up process for assigning a manipulation code to a locator, when the locator to which the code is being assigned is detected the mobile application or program may indicate via the operator interface the remaining battery life of that locator.
The triangulation system shown in
The operation process shown in
As seen in
The “favorites” process illustrated in
Although the preferred distance at which the first transceiver will detect a locator is 18 cm or less, it can be adjusted to suit individual situations and applications. For example, in the favorite's mode it may be sufficient for the first and locators to come within 30 cm of one another. Where Bluetooth is used for the wirelessly communicating first and locators, the predetermined activation distance can be adjusted as required via the mobile application or control program.
The mobile application or program running the process and system may be set up so that the user can review what code is assigned to a given locator, in case the user has forgotten after the locator was set up.
The locators may be set up so that they record data each time the first transceiver comes within the predetermined distance of the locator. That data may then be uploaded to the operator interface for analysis by an occupational therapist, for example.
These and other modifications and improvements may be incorporated without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1408253 | May 2014 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/307,385, filed on Oct. 28, 2016, entitled “Systems And Methods For Controlling A Prosthetic Hand,” which claims priority benefit and is a National Stage Entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2015/051356, filed on May 8, 2015, entitled “Systems And Methods For Controlling A Prosthetic Hand,” which claims priority benefit to G.B. App. No. 1408253.1, filed May 9, 2014, entitled “Systems And Methods For Controlling A Prosthetic Hand,” each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1507682 | Pecorella et al. | Sep 1924 | A |
2445711 | Fitch | Jul 1948 | A |
2477463 | Otterman | Jul 1949 | A |
2482555 | Otterman | Sep 1949 | A |
2508156 | Gillman | May 1950 | A |
2516791 | Motis et al. | Jul 1950 | A |
2592842 | Alderson | Apr 1952 | A |
2669727 | Opuszenski | Feb 1954 | A |
2983162 | Musser | May 1961 | A |
3406584 | Roantree | Oct 1968 | A |
3509583 | Fraloli | May 1970 | A |
3683423 | Crapanzano | Aug 1972 | A |
3751995 | Carlson | Aug 1973 | A |
3837010 | Prout | Sep 1974 | A |
3866246 | Seamone et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3883900 | Jerard et al. | May 1975 | A |
3922930 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4030141 | Graupe | Jun 1977 | A |
4044274 | Ohm | Aug 1977 | A |
4114464 | Schubert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4197592 | Klein | Apr 1980 | A |
4398110 | Flinchbaugh et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4558704 | Petrofsky | Dec 1985 | A |
4577127 | Ferree et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4623354 | Childress et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4678952 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4808187 | Patterson et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4813303 | Beezer et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822238 | Kwech | Apr 1989 | A |
4955918 | Lee | Sep 1990 | A |
4960425 | Yan et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4990162 | LeBlanc et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5020162 | Kersten et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5062673 | Mimura | Nov 1991 | A |
5088125 | Ansell et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5133776 | Chen | Jul 1992 | A |
5246463 | Giampapa | Sep 1993 | A |
5252102 | Singer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5387245 | Fay et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5413611 | Haslam, II et al. | May 1995 | A |
5498472 | Gold | Mar 1996 | A |
5581166 | Eismann et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5785960 | Rigg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5851194 | Fratrick | Dec 1998 | A |
5852675 | Matsuo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888213 | Sears et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888246 | Gow | Mar 1999 | A |
6111973 | Holt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6175962 | Michelson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6223615 | Huck | May 2001 | B1 |
6244873 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6344062 | Abboudi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361570 | Gow | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6494662 | De Montalembert | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6589287 | Lundborg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6660042 | Curcie et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6660043 | Kajitani et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684754 | Comer | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6786112 | Ruttor | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7056297 | Dohno et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7144430 | Archer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7243569 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7316304 | Heravi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7316795 | Knauss | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7370896 | Anderson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373721 | Bergamasco et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7640680 | Castro | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7823475 | Hirabayashi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828857 | Farnsworth et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7867287 | Puchhammer | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7922773 | Kuiken | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8016893 | Weinberg et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8100986 | Puchhammer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8197554 | Whiteley et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257446 | Puchhammer | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8337568 | Macduff | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8396546 | Hirata et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8491666 | Schulz | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8579991 | Puchhammer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593255 | Pang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8657887 | Gill | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8662552 | Torres-Jara | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8663339 | Inschlag et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8690963 | Puchhammer | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696763 | Gill | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8808397 | Gow | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821587 | Lanier et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8828096 | Gill | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840680 | Goldfarb et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8986395 | McLeary | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995760 | Gili | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9034055 | Vinjamuri et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9114030 | van der Merwe et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9121699 | van der Merwe et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9174339 | Goldfarb et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9265625 | Goldfarb et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9278012 | Gill | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9387095 | McLeary et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9402749 | Gill et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9463100 | Gill | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9720515 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9730815 | Goldfarb et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9826933 | van der Merwe et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9839534 | Lipsey et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9901465 | Lanier, Jr. et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9931230 | Sikdar et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9999522 | Gill | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10265197 | Gill et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10318863 | Lock et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10369024 | Gill | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10398576 | Gill et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10610385 | Meijer et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20010023058 | Jung et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020016631 | Marchitto et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020135241 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030036805 | Senior | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040002672 | Carlson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040078299 | Down-Logan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103740 | Townsend et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040181289 | Bedard et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182125 | McLean | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050021154 | Brimalm | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021155 | Brimalm | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050093997 | Dalton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101693 | Arbogast et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050192677 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060029909 | Kaczkowski | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054782 | Olsen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060158146 | Tadano | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167564 | Flaherty et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060212129 | Lake et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229755 | Kuiken et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251408 | Konno et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070032884 | Veatch | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058860 | Harville et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061111 | Jung et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071314 | Bhatti et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070230832 | Usui et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260328 | Bertels et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080058668 | Seyed Momen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080146981 | Greenwald et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080215162 | Farnsworth et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260218 | Smith et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262634 | Puchhammer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090213379 | Carroll et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100016990 | Kurtz | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100116078 | Kim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100271177 | Pang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274365 | Evans et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100328049 | Frysz | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110136376 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203027 | Flather et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110237381 | Puchhammer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257765 | Evans et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264238 | van der Merwe et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110265597 | Long | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110278061 | Farnan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120004884 | Fillol et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014571 | Wong et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120061155 | Berger et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120099788 | Bhatti et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120109337 | Schulz | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123558 | Gill | May 2012 | A1 |
20120204665 | Baudasse | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120280812 | Sheikman et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286629 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303136 | Macduff | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330439 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130041476 | Schulz | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053984 | Hunter et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130076699 | Spencer | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130144197 | Ingimundarson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130253705 | Goldfarb et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268094 | Van Wiemeersch | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140236314 | Van Wiemeersch | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140324189 | Gill et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140371871 | Farina et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150142082 | Simon et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150216681 | Lipsey et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150328019 | Park | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150351935 | Donati et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374515 | Meijer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160120664 | Schultz | May 2016 | A1 |
20160143751 | Chestek et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160166409 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160287422 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170007424 | Gill | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049583 | Belter et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170049586 | Gill et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170209288 | Veatch | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170281368 | Gill | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170340459 | Mandelbaum | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180014744 | Duerstock et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180064563 | Gill | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180071115 | Lipsey et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180116829 | Gaston et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180168477 | Graimann et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180221177 | Kaltenbach et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180235782 | Choi et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180256365 | Bai | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180296368 | Gill | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190091040 | Gill | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200054466 | Gill et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200197193 | Byrne et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200268532 | Meijer et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1803413 | Jul 2006 | CN |
309 367 | Nov 1918 | DE |
24 34 834 | Feb 1976 | DE |
198 54 762 | Jun 2000 | DE |
101 05 814 | Sep 2002 | DE |
203 15 575 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10 2012 009 699 | Nov 2013 | DE |
0 145 504 | Jun 1985 | EP |
0 219 478 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 256 643 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0 484 173 | May 1992 | EP |
0 947 899 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0 968 695 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 043 003 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 617 103 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2 532 927 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2 612 619 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2 114 316 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2 125 091 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2 467 101 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2 696 814 | Jan 2017 | EP |
326 970 | Mar 1930 | GB |
607 001 | Feb 1947 | GB |
1 386 942 | Mar 1975 | GB |
1 510 298 | May 1978 | GB |
1 585 256 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2 067 074 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2 146 406 | Apr 1985 | GB |
2 357 725 | Jul 2001 | GB |
2 444 679 | Jun 2008 | GB |
53-011456 | Feb 1978 | JP |
53-094633 | Aug 1978 | JP |
07-174631 | Jul 1995 | JP |
2001-082913 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-299448 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-131135 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-310242 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-134526 | May 2003 | JP |
2004-073802 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-224280 | Aug 2004 | JP |
WO 95024875 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 96023643 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 00025840 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 00069375 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 01004838 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 02049534 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03017877 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03017878 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03017880 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2006058190 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006069264 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006078432 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006086504 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006092604 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006110790 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007063266 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076764 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076765 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007126854 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007127973 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008044052 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008044207 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008092695 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098059 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2008098072 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2009011682 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2010018358 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010051798 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010149967 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011001136 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011022569 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011036473 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011036626 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2011088964 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011107778 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2011143004 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO 2014111843 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2015120076 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2015120083 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2016051138 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO 2017137930 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2018054945 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO 2018132711 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO 2018178420 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO 2018218129 | Nov 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dspic microcontrollers introduction and features. STmicroelectronics (Year: 2013). |
Kim, Tae Sung. Development of an Anthromorphic Prosthetic Hand H3 and its Control. (Year: 2008). |
Albu-Schaffer et al., “Soft Robotics”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Sep. 2008, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 20-30. |
Antonio et al., “A Virtual Upper Limb Prosthesis as a Training System”, 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE 2010) Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México. Sep. 8-10, 2010, pp. 210-215. |
Bellman et al., “SPARKy 3: Design of an Active Robotic Ankle Prosthesis with two Actuated Degrees of Freedom Using Regenerative Kinetics”, in Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Oct. 19-22, 2008, Scottsdale. AZ, pp. 511-516. |
Belter et al., “Mechanical Design and Performance Specifications or Anthropomorphic Prosthetic Hands: A Review”, JRRD, Jan. 2013, vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 599-618. |
Biddiss et al., “Consumer Design Priorities for Upper Limb Prosthetics”, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Nov. 2007, vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 346-357. |
Biddiss et al., “Upper Limb Prosthesis Use and Abandonment: A Survey of the Last 25 Years”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Sep. 2007, vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 236-257. |
Biddiss et al., “Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment”, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Dec. 2007, vol. 86, No. 12, pp. 977-987. |
Chicoine et al., “Prosthesis-Guided Training of Pattern Recognition-Controlled Myoelectric Prosthesis”, in Proceedings of the 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Diego, CA, Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2012, pp. 1876-1879. |
Childress et al., “Control of Limb Prostheses”, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Chapter 12, pp. 173-195, 2004. |
Choi et al., “Design of High Power Permanent Magnet Motor with Segment Rectangular Copper Wire and Closed Slot Opening on Electric Vehicles”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Jun. 2010, vol. 46. No. 9, pp. 2070-2073. |
Cipriani et al., “On the Shared Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand: Analysis of User-Prosthesis Interaction”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Feb. 2008, vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 170-184. |
Connolly, “Prosthetic Hands from Touch Bionics”, Industrial Robot, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2008, vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 290-293. |
Controzzi et al., “Miniaturized Non-Back-Drivable Mechanism for Robotic Applications”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Oct. 2010, vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 1395-1406. |
Damian et al., “Artificial Tactile Sensing of Position and Slip Speed by Exploiting Geometrical Features”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Feb. 2015, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 263-274. |
“DC Circuit Theory”, https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/dcp_1.html, Date verified by the Wayback Machine Apr. 23, 2013, pp. 16. |
Dechev et al., “Multiple Finger, Passive Adaptive Grasp Prosthetic Hand”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Oct. 1, 2001, vol. 36, No. 10, pp. 1157-1173. |
Dellorto, Danielle, “Bionic Hands Controlled by iPhone App”, CNN, Apr. 12, 2013, pp. 4 http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/12/health/bionic-hands. |
“DuPont Engineering Design—The Review of DuPont Engineering Polymers in Action”, http://www.engpolymer.co.kr/x_data/magazine/engdesign07_2e.pdf, 2007, pp. 16. |
Engeberg et al., “Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Prosthetic Hands to Simultaneously Prevent Slip and Minimize Deformation of Grasped Objects,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Feb. 2013, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 376-385. |
Fougner et al., “Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control-A Review”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems Rehabilitation Engineering, Sep. 2012, vol. 20. No. 5, pp. 663-677. |
Fukuda et al., “Training of Grasping Motion Using a Virtual Prosthetic Control System”, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Oct. 10-13, 2010, pp. 1793-1798. |
Gaine et al., “Upper Limb Traumatic Amputees. Review of Prosthetic Use”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, Feb. 1997, vol. 22B, No. 1, pp. 73-76. |
Grip Chips™, Datasheet, May 15, 2014, Issue 1, http://touchbionics.com/sites/default/files/files/Grip%20Chip%20datasheet%20May%202014.pdf. pp. 1. |
Heckathorne, Craig W., “Components for Electric-Powered Systems”, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Chapter 11, pp. 145-171, 2004. |
Hojjat et al., “A Comprehensive Study on Capabilities and Limitations of Roller-Screw with Emphasis on Slip Tendency”, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2009, vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1887-1899. |
Hsieh, Chiu-Fan., “Dynamics Analysis of Cycloidal Speed Reducers with Pinwheel and Nonpinwheel Designs”, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Sep. 2014, vol. 136, No. 9, pp. 091008-1-091008-11. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/GB2015/051356, dated Nov. 15, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/GB2015/051356, dated Jul. 14, 2015. |
Jebsen et al., “An Objective and Standardized Test of Hand Function”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jun. 1969, vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 311-319. |
Johannes et al., “An Overview of the Developmental Process for the Modular Prosthetic Limb,” John Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 2011, vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 207-216. |
Kent et al., “Electromyogram Synergy Control of a Dexterous Artificial Hand to Unscrew and Screw Objects”, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2014, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-20. |
Kermani et al., “Friction Identification and Compensation in Robotic Manipulators”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Dec. 2007, vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 2346-2353. |
Kuiken et al., “Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-Time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms”, JAMA, Feb. 11, 2009, vol. 301, No. 6, pp. 619-628. |
Kyberd et al., “Two-Degree-of-Freedom Powered Prosthetic Wrist”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 2011, vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 609-617. |
Lamounier et al., “On the Use of Virtual and Augmented Reality for Upper Limb Prostheses Training and Simulation”, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Aug. 31-Sep. 4, 2010, pp. 2451-2454. |
Light et al., “Establishing a Standardized Clinical Assessment Tool of Pathologic and Prosthetic Hand Function: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jun. 2002, vol. 83, pp. 776-783. |
Mace et al., “Augmenting Neuroprosthetic Hand Control Through Evaluation of a Bioacoustic interface”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 3-7, 2013, pp. 7. |
Majd et al., “A Continuous Friction Model for Servo Systems with Stiction”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications, 1995, pp. 296-301. |
Martinez-Villalpando et al., “Agonist-Antagonist Active Knee Prosthesis: A Preliminary Study in Level-Ground Walking”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, vol. 46, No. 3, 2009, pp. 361-374. |
Maxon Precision Motors, Inc., “Maxon Flat Motor: EX 10 flat 10 mm, brushless, 0.25 Watt”, Specification, May 2011, p. 181. |
Maxon Precision Motors, Inc., “Maxon EC Motor: EC10 10 mm, brushless, 8 Watt”, Specification, May 2011, p. 140. |
Miller et al., “Summary and Recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures”, Journal of Prosthetics Orthotics, 2009, vol. 21, pp. 83-89. |
Montagnani et al., “Is it Finger or Wrist Dexterity that is Missing in Current Hand Prostheses?”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Jul. 2015, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 600-609. |
Morita et al., “Development of 4-D.O.F. Manipulator Using Mechanical Impedance Adjuster”, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, Apr. 1996, pp. 2902-2907. |
Ninu et al., “Closed-Loop Control of Grasping with a Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis: Which are the Relevant Feedback Variable for Force Control?” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Sep. 2014, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 1041-1052. |
Osborn et al., “Utilizing Tactile Feedback for Biomimetic Grasping Control in Upper Limb Prostheses”. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, 2013, pp. 4. |
Pedrocchi et al., “MUNDUS Project: Multimodal Neuroprosthesis for Daily Upper Limb Support”, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2013, vol. 10, No. 66, pp. 20. http://www.ineuroengrehab.com/content/10/1/66. |
Pinzur et al., “Functional Outcome Following Traumatic Upper Limb Amputation and Prosthetic Limb Fitting”, J. Hand Surgery, Amer. Vol., 1994. vol. 19, pp. 836-839. |
Press Release, “Touch Bionics Introduce Digitally Controlled Supro Wrist”, http://www.touchbionics.com/news-events/news/touch-bionics-introduce-digitally-controlled-supro-wrist, May 3, 2016 in 2 pages. |
Raspopovic et al., “Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses”, Science Translational Medicine, Feb. 5, 2014, vol. 6, No. 222, pp. 1-10. |
Resnik et al., “The DEKA Arm: Its Features, Functionality, and Evolution During the Veterans Affairs Study to Optimize the DEKA Arm”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 2014, vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 492-504. |
Scheme et al., “Electromyogram Pattern Recognition for Control of Powered Upper-Limb Prostheses: State of the Art and Challenges for Clinical Use”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development (JRRD), 2011, vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 643-659. |
Scheme et al., “Motion Normalized Proportional Control for Improved Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Jan. 2014, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 149-157. |
Sensinger et al., “Cycloid vs. Harmonic Drives for use in High Ratio, Single Stage Robotic Transmissions”, 2012 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, USA, May 14-18, 2012, pp. 4130-4135. |
Sensinger, “Efficiency of High-Sensitivity Gear Trains, such as Cycloid Drives”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Jul. 2013, vol. 135, No. 7, pp. 071006-1-071006-9. |
Sensinger et al., “Exterior vs. Interior Rotors in Robotic Brushless Motors”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9-13, 2011, pp. 2764-2770. |
Sensinger, “Selecting Motors for Robots Using Biomimetic Trajectories: Optimum Benchmarks, Windings, and other Considerations,” 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AL, USA, May 3-8, 2010, pp. 4175-4181. |
Sensinger. “Unified Approach to Cycloid Drive Profile, Stress, and Efficiency Optimization”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Feb. 2010, vol. 132, pp. 024503-1-024503-5. |
Sensinger et al., “User-Modulated Impedance Control of a Prosthetic Elbow in Unconstrained, Perturbed Motion”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Mar. 2008, vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 1043-1055. |
Stix, Gary, “Phantom Touch: Imbuing a Prosthesis with Manual Dexterity”, Scientific American, Oct. 1998, pp. 41 & 44. |
“Supro Wrist”, Touch Bionics, https://web.archive.org/web/20160928141440/http://www.touchbionics.com/products/supro-wrist as archived Sep. 28, 2016 in 3 pages. |
Sutton et al., “Towards a Universal Coupler Design for Modern Powered Prostheses”, MEC 11 Raising the Standard, Proceedings of the 2011 MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium Frederiction, New Brunswick, Canada, Aug. 14-19, 2011, pp. 5. |
Tan et al., “A Neural Interface Provides Long-Term Stable Natural Touch Perception”, Science Translational Medicine, Oct. 8, 2014, vol. 6, No. 257, pp. 1-11. |
Tang, “General Concepts of Wrist Biomechanics and a View from Other Species”, The Journal of Hand Surgery, European Volume, Aug. 2008, vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 519-525. |
Toledo et al., “A Comparison of Direct and Pattern Recognition Control for a Two Degree-of-Freedom Above Elbow Virtual Prosthesis”, in Proceedings 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2012, pp. 4332-4335. |
“Touch Bionics Grip Chips Let Hand Prostheses Think for Themselves”, May 15, 2014, www.medgadget.com/2014/05/touch-blonics-grip-chips-let-hand-prostheses-think-for-themselves.html, pp. 2. |
Trachtenberg et al., “Radio Frequency Identification, An Innovative Solution to Guide Dexterous Prosthetic Hands”, 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Boston, MA, Aug. 30-Sep. 3, 2011, pp. 4. |
Vilarino, Martin, “A Novel Wireless Controller for Switching among Modes for an Upper-Limb Prosthesis”, The Academy Today, Jan. 2014, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. A-12 to A-15. |
Weir et al., “Design of Artificial Arms and Hands for Prosthetic Applications”, Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 537-598. |
Wettels et al., “Grip Control Using Biomimetic Tactile Sensing Systems”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Dec. 2009, vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 718-723. |
Whiteside et al., “Practice Analysis Task Force: Practice Analysis of the Disciplines of Orthotics and Prosthetics”, American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics, Inc., 2000, pp. 1-51. |
Wilson et al., “A Bus-Based Smart Myoelectric Electrode/Amplifier-System Requirements”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Oct. 2011, vol. 60, No. 10, pp. 3290-3299. |
Zampagni et al., “A Protocol for Clinical Evaluation of the Carrying Angle of the Elbow by Anatomic Landmarks”, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2008, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 106-112. |
Baek et al., “Design and Control of a Robotic Finger for Prosthetic Hands”, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 113-117. |
Butterfaß et al., “DLR-Hand II: Next Generation of a Dextrous Robot Hand”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea, May 21-26, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 109-114. |
Cotton et al., “Control Strategies for a Multiple Degree of Freedom Prosthetic Hand”, Measurement + Control, Feb. 2007, vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 24-27. |
Edsinger-Gonzales, Aaron, “Design of a Compliant and Force Sensing Hand for a Humanoid Robot”, 2005, pp. 5. |
Fildes, Jonathan, “Bionic Hand Wins Top Tech Prize”, BBC News, Jun. 9, 2008, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7443866.stm, pp. 3. |
Gaiser et al., “A New Anthropomorphic Robotic Hand”, 2008 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Dec. 1-3, 2008, Daejeon, Korea, pp. 418-422. |
“iLimb Bionic Hand Now Ready for Market”, Technovelgy.com, www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=1125, as printed Jul. 6, 2020 in 3 pages. |
Kargov et al., “Applications of a Fluidic Artificial Hand in the Field of Rehabilitation”, Rehabilitation Robotics, Ch. 15, Aug. 2007, pp. 261-286. |
Kargov et al., “Development of a Multifunctional Cosmetic Prosthetic Hand”, Proceedings for the 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Jun. 12-15, 2007, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 550-553. |
Kargov et al., “Modularly Designed Lightweight Anthropomorphic Robot Hand”, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, Sep. 3-6, 2006, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 155-159. |
Kawasaki et al., “Design and Control of Five-Fingered Haptic Interface Opposite to Human Hand”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Oct. 2007, vol. 23, No. 5., pp. 909-918. |
Lotti et al., “UBH 3: A Biologically Inspired Robotic Hand”, Jan. 2004, pp. 7. |
MEC '05: Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine, University of New Brunswick's MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium, Aug. 17-19, 2005, Fredericton NB Canada, pp. 260. |
Poppe, Zytel HTN Provides a Helping Hand, DuPont Engineering Design 8 (2007), pp. 3. |
Puig et al., “A Methodology for the Design of Robotic Hands with Multiple Fingers”, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2008, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 177-184. |
Pylatiuk et al., “Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands”, 18 J. Prosthetics and Orthotics 57-61 (2006). |
Pylatiuk et al., “Results of an Internet Survey of Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand Users”, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Dec. 2007, vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 362-370. |
Ryew et al., “Robotic Finger Mechanism with New Anthropomorphic Metacarpal Joint”, 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2000. IECON 2000, vol. 1, pp. 416-421. |
Schulz et al., “Die Entwicklung Einer Multifunktionalen Kosmetischen Handprothese”, Prothetik, Orthopádie-Technik, Aug. 2006, pp. 627-632. |
The Weir Thesis (“Weir Thesis”) is entitled “An Externally-Powered, Myo-Electrically Controlled Synergetic Prosthetic Hand for the Partial-Hand Amputee”, published Aug. 1989, pp. 365. |
Touch Bionics PowerPoint Presentation in 3 pages, believed to be shown at ISPO Conference in Leipzig, Germany, May 2016. (Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art as of the date indicated, but Applicant does not admit its status as prior art by submitting it here and reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date). |
Touch Bionics PowerPoint Slide in 1 page, believed to be presented at Advanced Arm Dynamics company Jan. 11, 2016. (Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art as of the date indicated, but Applicant does not admit its status as prior art by submitting it here and reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date). |
Touch Bionics Screenshots of video in PowerPoint Presentation in 4 pages, believed to be shown at ISPO Conference in Leipzig, Germany, May 2016. (Applicant requests that the Examiner consider this reference as qualifying as prior art as of the date indicated, but Applicant does not admit its status as prior art by submitting it here and reserves the right to challenge the reference's prior art status at a later date). |
Ward, Derek Kempton, “Design of a Two Degree of Freedom Robotic Finger”, Sep. 1996, pp. 155. |
Weir et al., “A Myoelectrically Controlled Prosthetic Hand for Transmetacarpal Amputations”, JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Jun. 2001, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 26-31. |
Weir et al., “The Design and Development of a Synergetic Partial Hand Prosthesis with Powered Fingers”, RESNA '89, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference, Technology for the Next Decade, Jun. 25-30, 1989, pp. 473-474. |
“World's First Bionic Hand Factory Opened by Scottish Company”, DailyMail.com, Jan. 8, 2008, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-506661/Worlds-bionic-hand-factory-opened-Scottish-company.html, pp. 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190216618 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15307385 | US | |
Child | 16249696 | US |