Systems and methods for controlling multiple surgical variables

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11801187
  • Patent Number
    11,801,187
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 8, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 31, 2023
    6 months ago
Abstract
A surgical patient interface including a base; a platform coupled to the base and including a first end and a second end, the platform configured to transition between a first position and a second position about a pivotable axis stationary relative to the base; a first abutment and a second abutment each adjustably coupled to the platform. In the first position, the platform extends between the first end and the second end in a substantially horizontal direction relative to the base, and the first abutment and the second abutment are separated by a first distance along the substantially horizontal direction. In the second position, the platform extends between the first end and the second end in a substantially vertical direction such that a torso of a patient extends in the substantially vertical direction, and the first abutment and the second abutment are separated by a second, different distance along the substantially vertical direction.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to medical devices and surgical methods, more specifically to a patient support platform. Such devices as well as systems and methods for use therewith are described.


BACKGROUND

Millions of surgical procedures are performed in the U.S. alone every year. Patients undergoing surgery are positioned for preparation for surgery and/or during the surgical procedure. One of the more common ways a patient is positioned on an operating room table is by being freely placed in a supine position (i.e., lying horizontally with face and torso facing up) or a prone position (i.e., lying horizontally with face and torso facing down).


Many current surgical techniques were designed or have evolved to solve problems specific to the period of time in which the surgery occurs. Some of the factors that have been taken into account in the design of surgical techniques include: the maintenance and handling of the weight of a patient's body without significant movement; the maintenance of a sterile field; easy access by the hands of one or more surgeons or surgical assistants while maintaining safe, ergonomic body positioning of the surgeons or surgical assistants; ease of incorporation of imaging systems including radiographic, fluoroscopic, or other imaging systems; maintenance and continuous measurement of controlled blood pressure; maintenance and continuous measurement of other vital parameters, such as temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate and rhythm, EKG, blood oxygen saturation, anesthesia level, state of reflexes, interface with medical equipment, and many other others. Some of the surgical positions used include prone, supine, lateral, lithotomy, and variations of these positions, such as the Trendelenburg position, the reverse Trendelenburg position, the full or high Fowler's position, the semi-Fowler's position, the jackknife or Kraske position, the high and low lithotomy positions, the fracture table position, the knee-chest position, the Lloyd-Davies position, the kidney position, and the Sims' position.


However, a significant problem with current surgical systems and methods is that anatomical and physiological conditions normal to the patient, such as weight distribution when the patient is standing normally, are not present during preparation of surgery or during the surgical procedure. Thus, patients may experience post-operative problems when returning to normal (i.e., non-surgical) anatomical positions and physiology. Therefore, a need continues to exist for systems and methods for performing surgical procedures under physiological and anatomical conditions normally experienced by the patient in the course of the patient's normal daily activities (e.g., standing, sleeping, sitting).


SUMMARY

The needs described above, as well as others, are addressed by embodiments of the systems and methods for controlling multiple surgical variables described in this disclosure (although it is to be understood that not all needs described above will necessarily be addressed by any one embodiment), as the systems and methods of the present disclosure are separable into multiple pieces and can be used independently or in combination.


The present disclosure provides for a surgical patient interface including a patient support platform having a first end and a second end and configured for secure placement with respect to at least one surface of a building structure. The patient support platform is configured to interface with a patient such that at least the torso of the patient extends in a generally vertical direction between the first end and the second end of the patient support platform. One or more patient supports couple to the patient support platform and are configured to secure the patient to the patient support platform, such that the at least the torso of the patient is held in a substantially static condition, and such that a target portion of the patient's skin is accessible for surgical puncture or incision.


The present disclosure further provides for a method for performing surgery. The method includes placing a surgical patient in a patient support platform having a first end and a second end and configured for secure placement with respect to at least one surface of a building structure. The patient support platform is configured to interface with the patient such that at least the torso of the patient extends in a generally vertical direction between the first end and the second end of the patient support platform. The patient support platform includes one or more patient supports coupled thereto and configured to secure the patient to the patient support platform, such that the at least the torso of the patient is held in a substantially static condition, and such that a target portion of the patient's skin is accessible for surgical puncture or incision. The method includes using one or more of the one or more patient supports to secure the surgical patient to the patient support platform, and performing surgery on the patient.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. A perspective view of a patient in a supine position on an embodiment of a surgical table.



FIG. 2. A cross-sectional view of a portion of a vertebral column.



FIG. 3. A perspective view of an embodiment of a vertical surgical table in a first position.



FIG. 4. A perspective view of the vertical surgical table of FIG. 3 in a second position.



FIG. 5. A perspective view of another embodiment of a vertical surgical table in a first position.



FIG. 6. A perspective view of the vertical surgical table of FIG. 5 in a second position.



FIG. 7. A perspective view of a further embodiment of a vertical surgical table in a first position.



FIG. 8. A perspective view of the vertical surgical table of FIG. 7 in a second position.



FIG. 9. A perspective view of an embodiment of a chair-based surgical table.



FIG. 10. A rear elevation view of the chair-based surgical table of FIG. 9.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for performing surgery on a patient such that patient anatomical and/or physiological conditions preparing for and during surgery are more closely reproduced to reflect anatomical and/or physiological conditions during normal patient activities (e.g., standing, sitting, sleeping) than current standard surgical techniques. Advantageously, the systems and methods of the present disclosure are capable of being used in conjunction with many current surgical positions. For example, the systems and methods of the present disclosure can be used with a patient placed in a prone position, which is used in a large percent of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine surgeries.


A surgical patient 10 is shown in FIG. 1 in a prone position on a surgical table 18, with the patient's head 12 and feet 14 extending generally horizontally in opposite directions from the patient's torso 16. In the prone position, the patient's dorsal side is facing up and the patient's ventral side is facing down. The surgical table 18 may include a base 20 having a floor interface 22 and a patient support platform 24 extending in a horizontal, or generally horizontal, direction with respect to the base 20. The base 20 may be vertical, or generally vertical. A first adjustable platform portion 26 may extend horizontally, or generally horizontally, from the platform 24 and may be tilted by angle α around a first pivot 28. Similarly, a second adjustable platform portion 30 may extend horizontally, or generally horizontally, from the platform and oppositely from the first adjustment platform portion 24, and may be tilted by angle β around a second pivot 32.



FIG. 2 illustrates a sagittal plane view of a portion of a vertebral column 100. As depicted, the vertebral column 100 includes a lumbar region 102, a sacral region 104, and a coccygeal region 106. The vertebral column 100 also includes a cervical region 105 and a thoracic region 107 (shown in FIG. 1). The lumbar region 102 of the vertebral column 100 includes a first lumbar vertebra 108, a second lumbar vertebra 110, a third lumbar vertebra 112, a fourth lumbar vertebra 114, and a fifth lumbar vertebra 116. The sacral region 104 includes a sacrum 118. Further, the coccygeal region 106 includes a coccyx 120.


As shown in FIG. 2, a first intervertebral lumbar disc 122 is disposed between the first lumbar vertebra 108 and the second lumbar vertebra 110. A second intervertebral lumbar disc 124 is disposed between the second lumbar vertebra 110 and the third lumbar vertebra 112. A third intervertebral lumbar disc 126 is disposed between the third lumbar vertebra 112 and the fourth lumbar vertebra 114. A fourth intervertebral lumbar disc 128 is disposed between the fourth lumbar vertebra 114 and the fifth lumbar vertebra 116. And, a fifth intervertebral lumbar disc 130 is disposed between the fifth lumbar vertebra 116 and the sacrum 118. Zygapophysial joints 125, also known as facet joints or z-joints, are located on the posterior of the vertebral column 100 on each side where two adjacent vertebrae (108, 110, 112, 114, 116) meet.


If one of the intervertebral lumbar discs (i.e., 122, 124, 126, 128, 130) is diseased, degenerated, or damaged or if one of the zygapophysial joints 125 is diseased, degenerated, or damaged, that disc or joint can be at least partially treated using an implanted device that provides rigid fixation, dynamic fixation, or adjustable fixation, including noninvasively-adjustable fixation. For example, a disc replacement device can be inserted into one of the intervertebral lumbar disc (e.g., 122, 124, 126, 128, 130) or one or more of the zygapophysial joints (e.g., 125).


In humans who are standing in a neutral position, a normal lumbar spine may be described as having a lumbar lordosis angle (LLA) 127 in the sagittal plane (i.e., the anatomical plane which divides the body into right and left halves) between about 20° and 40°. An LLA less than 20° is frequently considered lumbar hypolordosis and an LLA greater than 40° is frequently considered lumbar hyperlordosis. Similarly, the normal thoracic spine may be described as having a thoracic kyphosis of between about 20° and 50°, or between about 20° and 45°, or between about 25° and 45°. The lumbar region 102 is one of the key support elements for the upper portion of the body, weight (W) of which may, in many persons, constitute 50% or more of the persons' total body weight. The lordosis of the lumbar spine critically contributes to the lumbar region's 102 ability to support large amounts of weight. It is also important (along with the thoracic kyphosis) to a person's balance. When describing a patient's full or complete body herein (or simply “patient's body”), the term should be inclusive of all parts of the body, including the head and feet. Other modifiers may be used to denote specific portions of the patient's body (e.g., “upper body portion”).


Attempts may be made to position the body during prone lumbar spine surgery (such as illustrated in FIG. 1) in such a way to mimic normal lumbar lordosis. However, simply matching the patient's normal lumbar lordosis angle (LLAn) or a desired lumbar lordosis angle (LLAd) frequently does not create an anatomically or physiologically accurate condition. This is because many of the parameters of a normal standing, walking, sitting, running, or even reclining person are not recreated. First, the upper body portion weight W is not being applied to the lumbar region 102 during a prone lumbar spine surgery. Nor is a moment M, related to the upper body portion weight W (shown in FIG. 2), experience by the lumbar region 102. Furthermore, the body muscles 132, which can generate forces to help support the lumbar region 102, are not in the same condition (e.g., flexed, toned, or contracted). Body muscles 132 may include, but are not limited to, leg muscles 134 (e.g., quadriceps, hamstring), gluteal muscles 136 (e.g., gluteus maximus, gluteus minimus), abdominal muscles 138, and other muscles and/or muscle groups. In addition, the body comprises a large percentage of water (one might call it a pressure vessel). Some types of anesthesia may significantly change vascular tone, for example, blood vessel dilation or construction. Such changes in vascular tone may alter the surrounding forces on the lumbar region 102 and the vascularization and mechanical condition of the lumbar region 102. Lntraabdominal pressure in an upright person is at least partially dependent on the hydrostatic pressure of water in the body. Therefore, in a prone (or otherwise horizontally-oriented) patient, the abdominal pressure is likely changed, thus further changing the condition on the lumbar region 102. Moreover, during surgery body temperature commonly drops as much as one degree Celsius, or more, which may further affect any of the conditions mentioned.


Numerous types of surgery are performed with a primary purpose of improving the patient's mobility by changing the shape or condition of a portion of the patient's skeletal system. These surgeries may also reduce pain that the patient feels when in certain positions or when performing certain movements. Many of the higher stress positions or movements (and therefore, the positions and movements commonly responsible for increased pain) occur when a patient is in an erect (e.g., standing, walking, running) or a sitting position. In both erect and sitting positions, the lumbar region 102 of the vertebral column 100 fully or partially supports the upper body portion weight W. Oftentimes, the effect of a surgical procedure on the lumbar region 102 is not fully known until a patient has recovered, at least partially and sometimes fully, from surgery, and is able to engage in common movements and/or positions (e.g., run, walk, stand, sit), and thereby judge whether balance has improved, pain has diminished, stiffness has decreased, mobility has increased, or other factors have improved (e.g., in a noticeable fashion). Because the mechanical/physical conditions experienced by patients during surgery are so unlike the key high-stress positions and/or actions the patient typically experiences, the surgical technique tends to be based on a certain amount of conjecture or guess-work.


Examples of surgeries in the lumbar region 102 area include, but are not limited to: Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (commonly known as “ALIF”), Foraminotomy, Forminectomy, Kyphoplasty, Laminectomy, Laminoplasty, Laminotomy, Posterior Lumbar lnterbody Fusion (commonly known as “PLIF”), Scoliosis correction, including modifying a coronal plane deformity, Spinal Decompression, Spinal Fusion, Spinal Osteotomy, and Transforamenal Lumbar lnterbody Fusion (commonly known as “TLIF”). Along with these procedures, a discectomy or microdiscectomy may be performed. Lasers may be used in such surgical procedures. The procedures may be performed with normal incisions, or with smaller incisions (e.g., minimally invasive surgery). Some procedures may be performed endoscopically. Thoroscopic surgery may include, for example, thoroscopic release. In a large number of procedures, spinal instrumentation may be implanted to fixate or “instrument” a portion of the spine. This may include holding one or more vertebrae static with respect to one or more other vertebrae, for example, to aid fusion. Spinal instrumentation may include metal rods, screws, hooks, wires, and/or other materials, including polymers like PEEK.


Certain types of spinal instrumentation allow a finite, controlled amount of movement between bones (e.g., vertebrae); these types of spinal instrumentation are often called dynamic stabilization instrumentation. Other types of spinal instrumentation include adjustable spinal instrumentation. These include instrumentation that may be adjusted (e.g., lengthened or distracted) via a minimally invasive puncture or small incision. For example, through such a minimally invasive puncture or incision, a screw may be loosened, then a spinal rod may be lengthened, and then the screw may be retightened to again hold the spinal rod. Some such instrumentation has been named “growing rods.” One such implant is the VEPTR® or VEPTR II™ (Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib), manufactured by DePuySynthes, West Chester, Pa., USA. Recently, non-invasively adjustable spinal instrumentation has been developed which allows non-invasive post-surgical adjustment (e.g., lengthening, shortening). That is, no additional incision is required. For example, the MAGEC® system, manufactured by Ellipse Technologies, Inc., Irvine, Calif., USA, is a magnetically adjustable implant that may be lengthened or shortened after implantation by the use of an externally-applied magnetic field (e.g., a rotating magnetic field).


In addition to the changes in normal anatomy and physiology described above, a prone surgical position may place blood vessels in vulnerable positions, including, but not limited to, the vena cava, the aorta, the carotid artery, and/or the saphenous vein. The prone position may also make the patient's body susceptible to hyperextension of joints, and may increase the chance of damage to nerves including, but not limited to, the radial, brachia I, median, and/or ulnar nerves. The prone position may additionally place undesirable stress(es) on the lungs and/or other portions of the respiratory system.



FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate a surgical table 218 configured to hold a patient 10. Though the word “table” is used, it should not be defined as a strictly horizontal structure. In fact, a feature of the surgical table 218 is that it includes a platform 224 that is configured to extend in either a generally horizontal direction (such as is shown in FIG. 3) or a generally vertical direction between its first end 254 and its second end 256 (such as is shown in FIG. 4). The platform 224 is shown in FIG. 3 coupled to a base 220 having an interface 222 (e.g., a floor interface). In FIGS. 3 and 4, the interface 222 is shown coupled to, and supported by, a floor, but it may alternatively be coupled, and secured, to a wall, a ceiling, or another solid structure/surface. In some embodiments, the platform 224 may be permanently attached to a wall, ceiling, floor, or other structure, in a vertical position (similar to that shown in FIG. 4) either via the base 220 or without the base 220 (i.e., directly attached). The base 220 may be configured to rest on the floor, and the base 220 may be configured to balance on the floor. The embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4, however, shows the platform 224 adjustably coupled to the base 220 by a pivotable joint 252. The platform 224 may be rotationally adjusted between the horizontal position of FIG. 3 and the vertical position of FIG. 4, or any position in between. The rotating (manually or motorized) may be used to reversibly change the patient 10 position from approximately horizontal (prone, supine, lateral decubitus) to an approximately vertical (upright, equivalent to standing) during a surgical procedure, thereby creating access for a surgeon to initially place implants while the patient 10 is in prone position, then make final surgical adjustments with the patient 10 in vertical position. A motor (not shown) may be carried on the surgical table 218, and a control 265 may be used to adjust the platform 224 (e.g., rotate the platform 224 about the pivotable joint 252). FIG. 3 shows the patient in a prone, set-up position. That is to say that, the patient may be prepared (e.g., anesthetized, draped, swabbed, cleaned, etc.) in a prone position, prior to rotating the platform 224 to another desired position. The vertical position of the patient in FIG. 4 may be useful when performing vertical surgery, which can include any type of surgery that is benefitted by the patient's vertical orientation in relation to the earth's gravitational field. Such types of surgery may include the lumbar spine surgeries already mentioned, among several other surgeries that may benefit from the significantly different loads and conditions on the patient's body or portions of the patient's body. The manipulation of the sagittal plane may greatly benefit such surgeries. Examples of possibly advantageous manipulation include increasing or decreasing kyphosis, and/or increasing or decreasing lordosis. Examples include, but are not limited to, thoracic or thoracolumbar scoliosis surgery, limb lengthening (femur, tibia, fibula), trauma surgery (femur, tibia, fibula), ankle surgery, hip surgery, knee surgery, and surgery to correct rotational or angular defects of a bone.


In order to maintain the patient in a stable, substantially static condition during vertical surgery, one or more patient supports 240 may be coupled to the platform 224, and may include straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, and/or bolsters 258, 260, 262. In some embodiments, the straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250 may include one or more of a hole, a pocket, a hook and loop fastener feature, a tie-off, an adhesive feature, a clamp, and a groove. In some embodiments, the bolsters 258, 260, 262 may include one or more of a pillow, a rod, a tube, a mound, a bag, a pad, an inflated structure, a filled structure, and a buttress. The bolsters 258, 260, 262 may be configured to at least partially support at least one of a head, a neck, a shoulder, an arm, and elbow, a hand, a chest, a waist, a hip portion, a leg, a knee, an ankle, a foot, or any combination thereof. The patient 10 may be secured to the platform 224 using the patient supports 240 such that the patient's weight is well supported (e.g., evenly, securely, firmly, immovably) in the vertical position of FIG. 4. In some embodiments, the patient supports may secure the patient 10 to the platform 224 without good distribution of the patient's weight. In an embodiment, the patient supports 240 are configured to support the patient in a zero-gravity environment, such as in space and underwater. The patient supports 240 may be configured to transfer much of the counter-force to the body weight to frictional forces against the platform 224 (which may include one or more pads 264) and the bolsters 258, 260, 262. Counterforce to the body weight may even be transferred by frictional forces against the straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250. The orientation of the straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250 may be configured to prevent over-compression of one or more points on the patient's body (e.g., key point, pressure points, key nerves). Strap 242 may be used for securing the patient 10 at one or more locations at or on the waist. Strap 244 may be used for securing the patient 10 at one or more locations at or on the upper leg or thigh. Strap 246 may be used for securing the patient 10 at one or more locations at or on the lower leg or knee, or calf. Strap 248 may be used for securing the patient 10 at one or more locations at or on the shoulder or axil la (underarm). Strap 250 may be used for securing the patient 10 at one or more locations at or on the arm. Each of the straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250 and bolsters 258, 260, 262 may be singular, or paired (e.g., one on each side), or multiple.


The platform 224, in its entirety or a portion thereof, may be adjustable in relation to the base 220. The first end 254 or the second end 256 may be adjustable, such as angularly, rotationally, linearly, or in multiple axis, in relation to the base 220. The platform 224 may be locked in relation to the base 220.


The orientation of each of the patient supports 240 is such that an open, accessible area 266 in the skin may be left available for surgical preparation. Depending on the configuration of the patient supports 240 chosen, that area 266 may be at least 60 cm2, at least 120 cm2, or at least 200 cm2. The area 266 may be rectangular, square, circular, or any other shape that facilitates a surgical procedure, regardless of invasiveness (e.g., whether the surgery is minimally invasive or maximally invasive). In some embodiments, the vertical orientation of the patient may be adjusted to be partially vertical (i.e., from 90° to 60° from the direction of gravity), mostly vertical (i.e., from 20° to 60° from the direction of gravity), or substantially vertical (i.e., 0° to 20° from the direction of gravity). In some embodiments, the vertical orientation may be changed by around 180 degrees (e.g., from about positive vertical (i.e., feet down/head up) to about negative vertical (i.e., feet up/head down)). Adjustment away from vertical may be used to change (e.g., slightly change) the effective body weight of the patient, or the effective upper body portion weight W, which exerts force in the direction of gravity.



FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate a patient 10 on a surgical table 318 having an adjustable platform 324 and a base 320. The platform 324 has a first end 354 and a second end 356, and is adjustable in relation to a pivotable joint 352, by use of a control 365 and a motor (not shown). The base 320 may include an interface 322. Patient supports 340 may include one or more pads 360, straps 342, 344, 346, 348, 350 and bolsters 358, 360, 362, similar to those described above (i.e., pad 260, straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250, and bolsters 258, 260, 262 of FIGS. 3 and 4). FIG. 6 illustrates a vertical surgical position of the patient 10.


The surgical table 318 includes a load adjustment module 378. The load adjustment module 378 may be disposed at the first end 354 such that it is positioned proximate to the patient's upper body portion, such as the patient's shoulders or heads, when the patient 10 is positioned on table 318. First stop 368 and second stop 370, each of which are coupled to the platform 324, are adjustable to apply a linear compressive force Fon the patient 10. In other embodiments, each of the stops 368, 370 or both of the stops 368, 370 may be adjustable in relation to the platform 324. However, in FIGS. 5 and 6, second stop 370 is shown to be fixably coupled to the platform 324, while first stop 368 is adjustably coupled to the platform 324 along an axis, which may be defined as the direction of the sagittal plane. A motor 372, adjustable via a control unit 374, is configured to adjust first stop 368 along axis Z, for example, by moving an arm 376 in a positive or negative direction along axis Z. When the first stop 368 is moved in the negative direction, the first stop 368 and the second stop 370 place/generate a longitudinally-applied compressive force on the patient 10. In embodiments having an adjustably coupled second stop 370, when the second stop 370 is moved in the positive direction, the first stop 368 and the second stop 370 place/generate a longitudinally-applied compressive force on the patient 10. The first stop 368 may have a fixed position.



FIG. 6 shows the stop 368 engaging one or more shoulder, and stop 370 engaging one or more foot and applying (or increasing) the compressive force. The stop 368 may be configured to engage the shoulder as a pair of first stops 368, each pair of stops 368 configured to apply force to each shoulder. Alternatively, a single stop 368 may only apply force to one shoulder or both shoulders. The stops 368, 370 may be configured to engage other parts of the patient's body, including, but not limited to the knee, buttock, head and neck. In some embodiments, the stops 368, 370 may be replaced by harnesses or hooks, and be configured to apply traction, instead of compression. The harnesses or hooks may be configured to engage other body portions, including, but not limited to the axilla, upper foot, knee, hip, thigh, groin, and even head or neck. In other embodiments, a pair of combination stop/harness fixtures may allow for both adjustable traction and adjustable compression. The patient's body parts may be engaged either in an uncovered or unclothed state, or in a covered or clothed state. By allowing adjustment of the forces on the patient, a desired surgical condition may be controllably applied/created. For example, in certain surgeries, it may be desired to control the compression or traction force, but limit or negate the effect of gravity—in such cases, the surgery may be performed on a patient in the horizontal position of FIG. 5 (thereby effectively eliminating standard upright gravity) while using the load adjustment module 378 to generate/simulate compression or traction forces.



FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate a patient 10 on a surgical table 418 having an adjustable platform 424 and a base 420. The platform 424 has a first end 454 and a second end 456, and is adjustable in relation to a pivotable joint 452, by use of a control 465 and a motor (not shown). The base 420 may include an interface 422. The surgical table 418 has patient supports 440 that may include one or more pads 460, straps 442, 444, 446, 448, 450 and bolsters 458, 460, 462, similar to those described above (i.e., pad 260, straps 242, 244, 246, 248, 250 and bolsters 258, 260, 262 of FIGS. 3 and 4). FIG. 8 illustrates the vertical surgical position of a knee-to-shoulder portion of the patient 10. The first platform portion 471 may be adjusted (FIG. 8) so that the lower leg 11 of the patient 10 bends (e.g., extends in a substantially horizontal direction), while the knee-to-shoulder portion of the patient 10 extends in a substantially vertical direction. The table 418 includes a load adjustment module 478. The table 418 includes a first stop 468 adjustably coupled to the load adjustment module 478 via arm 476, and first platform portion 471 is pivotably coupled to the platform 324 via a pivot joint 473. The first stop 468 is adjustable relative to the first platform portion 471 to apply a linear compressive force F on the patient, for example, between the knees and the shoulder. Again, the first stop 468 and the first platform portion 471 may be used to engage other portions of the body and to apply forces between them. The first platform 471 may serve as a platform for feet or knees, and the first stop 468 may function as a bumper for the shoulders, such that a fraction (0-100%) of body weight can be applied through the skeleton. The table 418 may hold the patient 10 in a kneeling position while maintaining standing upright position of the torso.


As described in relation to the embodiment of FIGS. 5 and 6, harnesses or hooks (or the like) may be used to apply traction instead of compression.



FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate a chair-based or seat-based surgical table 518. The surgical table 518 includes a backrest portion 598 and a seat portion 596. The backrest portion 598 and the seat portion 596 may each be contoured to best fit a patient's body. The seat portion 596 may be angularly adjustable in relation to the backrest portion 598 (e.g., angularly and/or linearly). In some embodiments, an internal plate 594 within a seat pad 592 is angularly adjustable with respect to a frame 590 attached to the backrest portion 598 about a pivot joint 588. The adjustment may be controlled by a control 586 which may operate a manual adjustment mechanism or a motorized adjustment mechanism. One or more patient supports 540 may include straps 542, 544 and bolsters 562. The straps 542, 544 and bolsters 562 may maintain spinal curvature in an anesthetized patient in a sitting position or a standing position, such that the patient's spinal curvature and sagittal balance are equivalent to the standing or sitting neutral position of the patient before surgery. One or more adjustable height footrests 584 may be used (with or without the internal plate 594 adjustment) to control femur-to-hip angle φ and/or femur-to-tibia angle y. An open window 582 through the backrest portion 598 may allow for surgical access to the patient. The open window 582 may be positioned and expose access to the lumbar region 102, the sacral region 104, the coccygeal region 106, the cervical region 105, and the thoracic region 107, or combinations thereof (shown in FIG. 2). The window 582 may enable surgical, percutaneous, or transcutaneous manipulation of spinal anatomy of the supine patient 10. Load adjustment modules, similar to the load adjustment modules 378, 478 of the embodiments of FIGS. 5-6 and FIGS. 7-8, may also be incorporated into the chair-based surgical table 518 of FIGS. 9 and 10. One or more portions of the chair-based surgical table 518 may comprise materials that are partially or completely radiolucent to enable intraoperative radiographic imaging.


Advantageously, the support structure(s) described herein is capable of replicating anatomical and physiological conditions that the patient experiences during the patient's normal activities, such as sleeping, standing, and sitting. In this way, the presently disclosed support structure(s) allow a surgeon to operate on a patient with the benefit of observing, during the operating procedure, the effects of the surgical technique target as well as enabling the surgeon to select surgical technique based on the anatomical and physiological conditions that the patient normally experiences. It is believed that this benefit of the present support structure(s) and methods of use will result in improved surgical outcomes for patients.


In relation to any of the embodiments disclosed herein, all of the patient's weight may be borne by the patient (e.g., the patient's feet). Alternatively, in relation to any of the embodiments disclosed herein, a portion may be borne by the patient (e.g., the patient's feet) while a portion is borne by a support structure (e.g., stop 368, 370, 468 or first platform portion 471). The embodiments described herein may be used in surgical procedures which use general anesthesia, conscious sedation, local anesthesia, or other varieties of anesthesia. One or more drugs may be given to modify muscle tone of the patient 10. Stimulation, for example electrical stimulation, may be used to modify muscle tone. Stimulation may be done percutaneously, transcutaneously, or via an open or minimally invasive incision. A sterile field may be maintained during open surgery in an upright patient, such as with tented sterile drapes may be used in any of the embodiments to prevent drifting or falling particulate from entering surgical wound. Filtered air handling equipment may be used to move clean air over patient and prevent particulate from entering surgical wound.


In an embodiment, a method of placing and manipulating a musculoskeletal implant in a patient is provided. The method includes positioning the patient such that the bones of the head, spine, pelvis, and lower extremity are oriented in an upright standing position. The method may include performing a surgical intervention, either through an open skin incision or with minimally invasive percutaneous methods. The surgical intervention may be performed with the use of a robotic or robot-assisted surgical system. The surgical intervention may be performed with the use of an image-guided navigation system. The surgical intervention is performed with the use of minimally invasive access cannulas, retractors, and surgical instruments. The surgical intervention may be performed with the use of a fiber optic visualization system. The surgical intervention may include non-invasively adjusting the implant with a transcutaneous device that activates the implant to manipulate internal anatomy. The surgical intervention may be performed to implant a device on or near the cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, one or more hip or knee joints, or any combination thereof. The implant may be: a lumbar pedicle fixation device that can modify sagittal spine curvature, a lumbar pedicle fixation device that can modify coronal spine curvature. The device may be adjusted to modify varus or valgus alignment of bones connected by a joint, and the device can be adjusted to address flexion-extension misalignment of bones connected by a joint.


In another embodiment, a method for performing a surgical procedure is provided. The method includes placing a patient in a patient support platform having a first end and a second end and configured for secure placement with respect to at least one surface of a building structure, wherein the patient support platform is configured to interface with a patient such that at least the torso of the patient extends in a generally vertical direction between the first end and the second end of the patient support platform, the patient support platform including one or more patient supports coupled thereto and configured to maintain the position of the patient with respect to the patient support platform, such that the at least the torso of the patient remains in a substantially static condition, and such that a target portion of the patient is accessible. The method includes placing an external adjustment device in proximity to the target portion of the patient, and performing an adjustment procedure on the patient. The external adjustment device may be a magnetic device and configured to adjust a magnetic implant within the patient. The anatomy of the patient 10 may be manipulated by non-invasive external remote control of the magnetic implant.


In some embodiments, a method for performing surgery is provided. The method includes placing a surgical patient in a patient support platform having a first end and a second end and configured for secure placement with respect to at least one surface of a building structure, wherein the patient support platform is configured to interface with a patient such that at least the torso of the patient extends in a generally vertical direction between the first end and the second end of the patient support platform, the patient support platform including one or more patient supports coupled thereto and configured to secure the patient to the patient support platform, such that the at least the torso of the patient is held in a substantially static condition, and such that a target portion of the patient's skin is accessible for surgical puncture or incision. The method includes using one or more of the one or more patient supports to secure the surgical patient to the patient support platform, and performing surgery on the patient. The surgery may be performed through a window in the patient support platform.


In addition to performing surgery with a patient positioned using the various systems and methods disclosed herein, other procedures may be performed in a conscious (i.e., awake) and/or non-surgical patient. For example, patients who have been implanted with non-invasively adjustable spinal instrumentation, such as the MAGEC® system, may be placed in, on, adjacent, or against any of the embodiments described herein to have their non-invasive adjustment procedures performed. For example, a window in any embodiments disclosed herein, may be configured to allow the placement of an external adjustment device (e.g., magnetic external adjustment device) adjacent the skin of the patient to perform non-invasive adjustment (lengthening, shortening, etc.). Additionally, patients who have been implanted with implants which are adjustable via a minimally invasive procedure (e.g., growing rods, VEPTR®) may be placed in, on, adjacent, or against any of the embodiments described herein to have their minimally-invasive adjustment procedures performed.


Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.


Similarly, this method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim requires more features than are expressly recited in that claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.

Claims
  • 1. A surgical patient interface comprising: a base;a platform coupled to the base and including a first end and a second end, the platform configured to transition between a first position and a second position about a pivotable axis that is stationary relative to the base;a first abutment and a second abutment each adjustably coupled to the platform; wherein, in the first position, the platform extends between the first end and the second end in a substantially horizontal direction relative to the base, and the first abutment and the second abutment are separated by a first distance along the substantially horizontal direction, andwherein, in the second position, the platform extends between the first end and the second end in a substantially vertical direction such that a torso of a patient positioned on the platform extends in the substantially vertical direction, and the first abutment and the second abutment are separated by a second distance along the substantially vertical direction, wherein the second distance is different from the first distance.
  • 2. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, wherein the platform is configured to be coupled to a wall, ceiling, or floor.
  • 3. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, wherein the platform further comprises one or more contours configured to interface with one or more portions of the patient's body.
  • 4. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, wherein the platform is configured such that the patient's head is placed towards the first end and the patient's knees, buttocks, or feet are placed towards the second end.
  • 5. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, wherein the platform comprises a generally L-shaped structure or a seat.
  • 6. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, wherein the platform comprises a generally flat platform structure.
  • 7. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, wherein the platform includes a window configured for surgical access to the patient.
  • 8. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, further comprising a load control module.
  • 9. The surgical patient interface of claim 8, wherein the load control module is configured to place a load or change an amount of the load on the patient.
  • 10. The surgical patient interface of claim 8, wherein the load control module is configured to adjust one or both of the first abutment and the second abutment to change a load on the patient when the platform is in the second position.
  • 11. The surgical patient interface of claim 8, wherein the load control module is configured to engage one or more covered or uncovered shoulder, axilla, foot, including an underside or an upper side of the foot, knee, or buttock of the patient.
  • 12. The surgical patient interface of claim 8, wherein the load control module comprises a motor.
  • 13. The surgical patient interface of claim 12, wherein the motor is configured to change the first distance between the first end of the platform and the second end of the platform.
  • 14. The surgical patient interface of claim 12, wherein the motor is configured to change the second distance between the first abutment and the second abutment when the platform is in the second position.
  • 15. The surgical patient interface of claim 12, wherein the platform comprises a first harness and a second harness, and wherein at least one of the first harness and the second harness is adjustable in relation to the platform, and wherein the motor is configured to change a distance between the first harness and the second harness.
  • 16. The surgical patient interface of claim 8, wherein the load control module is configured to adjust a traction force, a compression force, or a combination thereof on at least a portion of the patient.
  • 17. The surgical patient interface of claim 8, wherein the load control module is configured to apply a traction force on at least a first portion of the patient, and to apply a compression force on at least a second portion of the patient.
  • 18. The surgical patient interface of claim 1, further comprising one or more patient supports coupled to the platform and configured to secure the patient to the platform, such that the torso of the patient is held in a substantially static condition, and such that a target portion of the patient's skin is accessible for surgical puncture or incision.
  • 19. The surgical patient interface of claim 18, wherein the target portion of the patient's skin comprises skin on a posterior side of the patent adjacent lumbar vertebrae of the patient.
  • 20. The surgical patient interface of claim 18, wherein the one or more patient supports are configured to releasably secure a portion of the patient's body to the platform.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of currently pending U.S. Non-Provisional Continuation application Ser. No. 16/058,750 filed on Aug. 8, 2018, which is a continuation application of PCT Application No. PCT/US17/17331 filed on Feb. 10, 2017, which claims the benefit of the priority date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/293,755 filed on Feb. 10, 2016. The entire contents of all these applications are hereby incorporated by reference into this disclosure as if set forth fully herein.

US Referenced Citations (550)
Number Name Date Kind
1374115 Roemer Apr 1921 A
2693796 Warner Nov 1954 A
2702031 Wenger Feb 1955 A
2865367 Sorenson Dec 1958 A
2950715 Brobeck Aug 1960 A
3111945 Von Solbrig Nov 1963 A
3372476 Peiffer Mar 1968 A
3377576 Langberg Apr 1968 A
3512901 Law May 1970 A
3597781 Eibes Aug 1971 A
3655968 Moore et al. Apr 1972 A
3900025 Barnes, Jr. Aug 1975 A
3915151 Kraus Oct 1975 A
RE28907 Eibes et al. Jul 1976 E
3976060 Hildebrandt et al. Aug 1976 A
4010758 Rockland et al. Mar 1977 A
4056743 Clifford et al. Nov 1977 A
4068821 Morrison Jan 1978 A
4078559 Nissinen Mar 1978 A
4204541 Kapitanov May 1980 A
4357946 Dutcher et al. Nov 1982 A
4372551 Yurdin Feb 1983 A
4386603 Mayfield Jun 1983 A
4448191 Rodnyansky et al. May 1984 A
4486176 Tardieu et al. Dec 1984 A
4501266 McDaniel Feb 1985 A
4522501 Shannon Jun 1985 A
4537520 Ochiai et al. Aug 1985 A
4550279 Klein Oct 1985 A
4561798 Elcrin et al. Dec 1985 A
4573454 Hoffman Mar 1986 A
4592355 Antebi Jun 1986 A
4595007 Mericle Jun 1986 A
4642257 Chase Feb 1987 A
4658809 Ulrich et al. Apr 1987 A
4700091 Wuthrich Oct 1987 A
4747832 Buffet May 1988 A
4854304 Zielke Aug 1989 A
4904861 Epstein et al. Feb 1990 A
4931055 Bumpus et al. Jun 1990 A
4940467 Tronzo Jul 1990 A
4957495 Kluger Sep 1990 A
4973331 Pursley et al. Nov 1990 A
5010879 Moriya et al. Apr 1991 A
5030235 Campbell, Jr. Jul 1991 A
5041112 Mingozzi et al. Aug 1991 A
5064004 Lundell Nov 1991 A
5074882 Grammont et al. Dec 1991 A
5092889 Campbell, Jr. Mar 1992 A
5133716 Plaza Jul 1992 A
5142407 Varaprasad et al. Aug 1992 A
5156605 Pursley et al. Oct 1992 A
5263955 Baumgart et al. Nov 1993 A
5290289 Sanders et al. Mar 1994 A
5306275 Bryan Apr 1994 A
5330503 Yoon Jul 1994 A
5334202 Carter Aug 1994 A
5336223 Rogers Aug 1994 A
5356411 Spievack Oct 1994 A
5356424 Buzerak et al. Oct 1994 A
5364396 Robinson et al. Nov 1994 A
5403322 Herzenberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5429638 Muschler et al. Jul 1995 A
5437266 McPherson et al. Aug 1995 A
5466261 Richelsoph Nov 1995 A
5468030 Walling Nov 1995 A
5480437 Draenert Jan 1996 A
5509888 Miller Apr 1996 A
5516335 Kummer et al. May 1996 A
5527309 Shelton Jun 1996 A
5536269 Spievack Jul 1996 A
5549610 Russell et al. Aug 1996 A
5573012 McEwan Nov 1996 A
5575790 Chen et al. Nov 1996 A
5582616 Bolduc et al. Dec 1996 A
5620445 Brosnahan et al. Apr 1997 A
5620449 Faccioli et al. Apr 1997 A
5626579 Muschler et al. May 1997 A
5626613 Schmieding May 1997 A
5632744 Campbell, Jr. May 1997 A
5659217 Petersen Aug 1997 A
5662683 Kay Sep 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5672177 Seldin Sep 1997 A
5700263 Schendel Dec 1997 A
5704938 Staehlin et al. Jan 1998 A
5704939 Justin Jan 1998 A
5720746 Soubeiran Feb 1998 A
5743910 Bays et al. Apr 1998 A
5762599 Sohn Jun 1998 A
5771903 Jakobsson Jun 1998 A
5810815 Morales Sep 1998 A
5827286 Incavo et al. Oct 1998 A
5830221 Stein et al. Nov 1998 A
5879375 Larson, Jr. et al. Mar 1999 A
5902304 Walker et al. May 1999 A
5935127 Border Aug 1999 A
5945762 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5961553 Coty et al. Oct 1999 A
5976138 Baumgart et al. Nov 1999 A
5979456 Magovern Nov 1999 A
5983424 Naslund Nov 1999 A
6022349 McLeod et al. Feb 2000 A
6033412 Losken et al. Mar 2000 A
6034296 Elvin et al. Mar 2000 A
6102922 Jakobsson et al. Aug 2000 A
6106525 Sachse Aug 2000 A
6126660 Dietz Oct 2000 A
6126661 Faccioli et al. Oct 2000 A
6138681 Chen et al. Oct 2000 A
6139316 Sachdeva et al. Oct 2000 A
6162223 Orsak et al. Dec 2000 A
6183476 Gerhardt et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200317 Aalsma et al. Mar 2001 B1
6234956 He et al. May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6243897 Sumiya Jun 2001 B1
6245075 Betz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6308712 Shaw Oct 2001 B1
6315784 Djurovic Nov 2001 B1
6319255 Grundei et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331744 Chen et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336929 Justin Jan 2002 B1
6343568 McClasky Feb 2002 B1
6353949 Falbo Mar 2002 B1
6358283 Hogfors et al. Mar 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389187 Greenaway et al. May 2002 B1
6400980 Lemelson Jun 2002 B1
6402753 Cole et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409175 Evans et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416516 Stauch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428497 Crouch Aug 2002 B1
6499907 Baur Dec 2002 B1
6500110 Davey et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508820 Bales Jan 2003 B2
6510345 Van Bentem Jan 2003 B1
6537196 Creighton, IV et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554831 Rivard et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565573 Ferrante et al. May 2003 B1
6565576 Stauch et al. May 2003 B1
6582313 Perrow Jun 2003 B2
6583630 Mendes et al. Jun 2003 B2
6616669 Ogilvie et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626917 Craig Sep 2003 B1
6656135 Zogbi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6656194 Gannoe et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667725 Simons et al. Dec 2003 B1
6673079 Kane Jan 2004 B1
6702816 Buhler Mar 2004 B2
6706042 Taylor Mar 2004 B2
6709293 Mori et al. Mar 2004 B2
6730087 Butsch May 2004 B1
6761503 Breese Jul 2004 B2
6769499 Cargill et al. Aug 2004 B2
6789442 Forch Sep 2004 B2
6796984 Soubeiran Sep 2004 B2
6802844 Ferree Oct 2004 B2
6809434 Duncan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6835207 Zacouto et al. Dec 2004 B2
6852113 Nathanson et al. Feb 2005 B2
6918838 Schwarzler et al. Jul 2005 B2
6918910 Smith et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921400 Sohngen Jul 2005 B2
6923951 Contag et al. Aug 2005 B2
6971143 Domroese Dec 2005 B2
7001346 White Feb 2006 B2
7008425 Phillips Mar 2006 B2
7011658 Young Mar 2006 B2
7029472 Fortin Apr 2006 B1
7029475 Panjabi Apr 2006 B2
7041105 Michelson May 2006 B2
7060080 Bachmann Jun 2006 B2
7063706 Wittenstein Jun 2006 B2
7105029 Doubler et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105968 Nissen Sep 2006 B2
7114501 Johnson et al. Oct 2006 B2
7115129 Heggeness Oct 2006 B2
7135022 Kosashvili et al. Nov 2006 B2
7160312 Saadat Jan 2007 B2
7163538 Altarac et al. Jan 2007 B2
7189005 Ward Mar 2007 B2
7191007 Desai et al. Mar 2007 B2
7218232 DiSilvestro et al. May 2007 B2
7238191 Bachmann Jul 2007 B2
7241300 Sharkawy et al. Jul 2007 B2
7243719 Baron et al. Jul 2007 B2
7255682 Bartol, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B1
7282023 Frering Oct 2007 B2
7285087 Moaddeb et al. Oct 2007 B2
7302015 Kim et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302858 Walsh et al. Dec 2007 B2
7314443 Jordan et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333013 Berger Feb 2008 B2
7357037 Hnat et al. Apr 2008 B2
7357635 Belfor et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360542 Nelson et al. Apr 2008 B2
7361128 Chen Apr 2008 B2
7390007 Helms et al. Jun 2008 B2
7390294 Hassler, Jr. Jun 2008 B2
7402134 Moaddeb et al. Jul 2008 B2
7402176 Malek Jul 2008 B2
7429259 Cadeddu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7445010 Kugler et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458981 Fielding et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485149 White Feb 2009 B1
7489495 Stevenson Feb 2009 B2
7530981 Kutsenko May 2009 B2
7531002 Sutton et al. May 2009 B2
7553298 Hunt et al. Jun 2009 B2
7561916 Hunt et al. Jul 2009 B2
7611526 Carl et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618435 Opolski Nov 2009 B2
7658754 Zhang et al. Feb 2010 B2
7666184 Stauch Feb 2010 B2
7666210 Franck et al. Feb 2010 B2
7678136 Doubler et al. Mar 2010 B2
7678139 Garamszegi et al. Mar 2010 B2
7708737 Kraft et al. May 2010 B2
7708762 McCarthy et al. May 2010 B2
7727143 Birk et al. Jun 2010 B2
7753913 Szakelyhidi, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 B2
7753915 Eksler et al. Jul 2010 B1
7762998 Birk et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763080 Southworth Jul 2010 B2
7766855 Miethke Aug 2010 B2
7775215 Hassler, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776068 Ainsworth et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776075 Bruneau et al. Aug 2010 B2
7787958 Stevenson Aug 2010 B2
7794476 Wisnewski Sep 2010 B2
7811328 Molz, IV et al. Oct 2010 B2
7835779 Anderson et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837691 Cordes et al. Nov 2010 B2
7862586 Malek Jan 2011 B2
7867235 Fell et al. Jan 2011 B2
7875033 Richter et al. Jan 2011 B2
7901381 Birk et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909852 Boomer et al. Mar 2011 B2
7918844 Byrum et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938841 Sharkawy et al. May 2011 B2
7985256 Grotz et al. Jul 2011 B2
7988709 Clark et al. Aug 2011 B2
8002809 Baynham Aug 2011 B2
8011308 Picchio Sep 2011 B2
8034080 Malandain et al. Oct 2011 B2
8043299 Conway Oct 2011 B2
8043338 Dant Oct 2011 B2
8057473 Orsak et al. Nov 2011 B2
8057513 Kohm et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083741 Morgan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8092499 Roth Jan 2012 B1
8095317 Ekseth et al. Jan 2012 B2
8105360 Connor Jan 2012 B1
8114158 Carl et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123805 Makower et al. Feb 2012 B2
8133280 Voellmicke et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147549 Metcalf, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8162897 Byrum Apr 2012 B2
8162979 Sachs et al. Apr 2012 B2
8177789 Magill et al. May 2012 B2
8197490 Pool et al. Jun 2012 B2
8211149 Justis Jul 2012 B2
8211151 Schwab et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221420 Keller Jul 2012 B2
8226690 Altarac et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236002 Fortin et al. Aug 2012 B2
8241331 Arnin Aug 2012 B2
8246630 Manzi et al. Aug 2012 B2
8252063 Stauch Aug 2012 B2
8267969 Altarac et al. Sep 2012 B2
8278941 Kroh et al. Oct 2012 B2
8282671 Connor Oct 2012 B2
8323290 Metzger et al. Dec 2012 B2
8357182 Seme Jan 2013 B2
8366628 Denker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8372078 Collazo Feb 2013 B2
8386018 Stauch et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394124 Biyani Mar 2013 B2
8403958 Schwab Mar 2013 B2
8414584 Brigido Apr 2013 B2
8425608 Dewey et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435268 Thompson et al. May 2013 B2
8439926 Bojarski et al. May 2013 B2
8444693 Reiley May 2013 B2
8469908 Asfora Jun 2013 B2
8470004 Reiley Jun 2013 B2
8486070 Morgan et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486076 Chavarria et al. Jul 2013 B2
8486147 De Villiers et al. Jul 2013 B2
8494805 Roche et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496662 Novak et al. Jul 2013 B2
8518062 Cole et al. Aug 2013 B2
8523866 Sidebotham et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529474 Gupta et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529606 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8529607 Alamin et al. Sep 2013 B2
8556901 Anthony et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556911 Mehta et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556975 Ciupik et al. Oct 2013 B2
8562653 Alamin et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568457 Hunziker Oct 2013 B2
8617220 Skaggs Oct 2013 B2
8579979 Edie et al. Nov 2013 B2
8585595 Heilman Nov 2013 B2
8585740 Ross et al. Nov 2013 B1
8591549 Lange Nov 2013 B2
8591553 Eisermann et al. Nov 2013 B2
8613758 Linares Dec 2013 B2
8623036 Harrison et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632544 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632548 Soubeiran Jan 2014 B2
8632563 Nagase et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636771 Butler et al. Jan 2014 B2
8636802 Serhan et al. Jan 2014 B2
8641719 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8641723 Connor Feb 2014 B2
8657856 Gephart et al. Feb 2014 B2
8663285 Dall et al. Mar 2014 B2
8663287 Butler et al. Mar 2014 B2
8668719 Alamin et al. Mar 2014 B2
8709090 Makower et al. Apr 2014 B2
8758347 Weiner et al. Jun 2014 B2
8758355 Fisher et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771272 LeCronier et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777947 Zahrly et al. Jul 2014 B2
8777995 McClintock et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790343 McClellan et al. Jul 2014 B2
8790409 Van den Heuvel et al. Jul 2014 B2
8828058 Elsebaie et al. Sep 2014 B2
8828087 Stone et al. Sep 2014 B2
8840651 Reiley Sep 2014 B2
8870881 Rezach et al. Oct 2014 B2
8870959 Arnin Oct 2014 B2
8915915 Harrison et al. Dec 2014 B2
8915917 Doherty et al. Dec 2014 B2
8920422 Homeier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8945188 Rezach et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961521 Keefer et al. Feb 2015 B2
8961567 Hunziker Feb 2015 B2
8968402 Myers et al. Mar 2015 B2
8992527 Guichet Mar 2015 B2
9022917 Kasic et al. May 2015 B2
9044218 Young Jun 2015 B2
9060810 Kercher et al. Jun 2015 B2
9078703 Arnin Jul 2015 B2
9662260 Bervian May 2017 B2
11278462 Schwardt et al. Mar 2022 B2
20020050112 Koch et al. May 2002 A1
20020072758 Reo et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020164905 Bryant Nov 2002 A1
20030040671 Somogyi et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030144669 Robinson Jul 2003 A1
20030220643 Ferree Nov 2003 A1
20030220644 Thelen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040011137 Hnat et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040011365 Govari et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019353 Freid et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023623 Stauch et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040055610 Forsell Mar 2004 A1
20040133219 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040138725 Forsell Jul 2004 A1
20040193266 Meyer Sep 2004 A1
20050034705 McClendon Feb 2005 A1
20050049617 Chatlynne et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065529 Liu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050090823 Bartimus Apr 2005 A1
20050120479 Habashi et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050159754 Odrich Jul 2005 A1
20050234448 McCarthy Oct 2005 A1
20050234462 Hershberger Oct 2005 A1
20050246034 Soubeiran Nov 2005 A1
20050261779 Meyer Nov 2005 A1
20050272976 Tanaka et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004459 Hazebrouck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060009767 Kiester Jan 2006 A1
20060036259 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036323 Carl et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060036324 Sachs et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060047282 Gordon Mar 2006 A1
20060058792 Hynes Mar 2006 A1
20060069447 DiSilvestro et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060074448 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079897 Harrison et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060136062 DiNello et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142767 Green et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155279 Ogilvie Jul 2006 A1
20060195087 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195088 Sacher et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200134 Freid et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204156 Takehara et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235299 Martinelli Oct 2006 A1
20060235424 Vitale et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241746 Shaoulian et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241767 Doty Oct 2006 A1
20060249914 Dulin Nov 2006 A1
20060271107 Harrison et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282073 Simanovsky Dec 2006 A1
20060293683 Stauch Dec 2006 A1
20070010814 Stauch Jan 2007 A1
20070010887 Williams et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021644 Woolson et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031131 Griffitts Feb 2007 A1
20070043376 Leatherbury et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050030 Kim Mar 2007 A1
20070118215 Moaddeb May 2007 A1
20070161984 Cresina et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173837 Chan et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070179493 Kim Aug 2007 A1
20070185374 Kick et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189461 Sommer Aug 2007 A1
20070233098 Mastrorio et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239159 Altarac et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239161 Giger et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070255088 Jacobson et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270803 Giger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276368 Trieu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276369 Allard et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276373 Malandain Nov 2007 A1
20070276378 Harrison et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276493 Malandain et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288024 Gollogly Dec 2007 A1
20070288183 Bulkes et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080009792 Henniges et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015577 Loeb Jan 2008 A1
20080021454 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021455 Chao et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021456 Gupta et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080027436 Cournoyer et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033431 Jung et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080033436 Song et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080051784 Gollogly Feb 2008 A1
20080082118 Edidin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080086128 Lewis Apr 2008 A1
20080097487 Pool et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097496 Chang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080108995 Conway et al. May 2008 A1
20080161933 Grotz et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167685 Allard et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172063 Taylor Jul 2008 A1
20080176714 Boren Jul 2008 A1
20080177319 Schwab Jul 2008 A1
20080177326 Thompson Jul 2008 A1
20080190237 Radinger et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228186 Gall et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080255615 Vittur et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269030 Hoffman Oct 2008 A1
20080272928 Shuster Nov 2008 A1
20080275557 Makower et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090030462 Buttermann Jan 2009 A1
20090076597 Dahlgren et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082815 Zylber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088803 Justis et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093820 Trieu et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093890 Gelbart Apr 2009 A1
20090112263 Pool et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090163780 Tieu Jun 2009 A1
20090171356 Klett Jul 2009 A1
20090192514 Feinberg et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198144 Phillips et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216113 Meier et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090275984 Kim et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090300845 Paz Dec 2009 A1
20100004654 Schmitz et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100057127 McGuire et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100094306 Chang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100100185 Trieu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106192 Barry Apr 2010 A1
20100114322 Clifford et al. May 2010 A1
20100130941 Conlon et al. May 2010 A1
20100137872 Kam et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145449 Makower et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100145462 Ainsworth et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100147314 Lees Jun 2010 A1
20100168751 Anderson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100217271 Pool et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100249782 Durham Sep 2010 A1
20100256626 Muller et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100262239 Boyden et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100318129 Seme et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331883 Schmitz et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110004076 Janna et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110057756 Marinescu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066188 Seme et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110098748 Jangra Apr 2011 A1
20110152725 Demir et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110196435 Forsell Aug 2011 A1
20110202138 Shenoy et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110230883 Zahrly et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238126 Soubeiran Sep 2011 A1
20110257655 Copf, Jr. Oct 2011 A1
20110284014 Cadeddu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120004494 Payne et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019341 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019342 Gabay et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120053633 Stauch Mar 2012 A1
20120088953 King Apr 2012 A1
20120109207 Trieu May 2012 A1
20120116535 Ratron et al. May 2012 A1
20120158061 Koch et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120172883 Sayago Jul 2012 A1
20120179215 Soubeiran Jul 2012 A1
20120221106 Makower et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120271353 Barry Oct 2012 A1
20120296234 Wilhelm et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120329882 Messersmith et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130013066 Landry et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130072932 Stauch Mar 2013 A1
20130123847 Anderson et al. May 2013 A1
20130138017 Jundt et al. May 2013 A1
20130138154 Reiley May 2013 A1
20130150863 Baumgartner Jun 2013 A1
20130150889 Fening et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130178903 Abdou Jul 2013 A1
20130211521 Shenoy et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130245692 Hayes et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253344 Griswold et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130253587 Carls et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130261672 Horvath Oct 2013 A1
20130296863 Globerman et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296864 Burley et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130296940 Northcutt et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130325006 Michelinie et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130325071 Niemiec et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140005788 Haaja et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025172 Lucas et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140052134 Orisek Feb 2014 A1
20140058392 Mueckter et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058450 Arlet Feb 2014 A1
20140066987 Hestad et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140088715 Ciupik Mar 2014 A1
20140128920 Kantelhardt May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140236234 Kroll et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140236311 Vicatos et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140245537 Allen Sep 2014 A1
20140257412 Patty et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140277446 Clifford et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140296918 Fening et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303538 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303539 Baym et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140358150 Kaufman et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150032109 Pool et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150105782 D'Lima et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150105824 Moskowitz et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150196332 Pool et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150313745 Cheng Nov 2015 A1
20160287458 Skursky Oct 2016 A1
20170252253 Kim Sep 2017 A1
20210386606 Campagna Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (34)
Number Date Country
1697630 Nov 2005 CN
101040807 Sep 2007 CN
202505467 Nov 2015 CN
204744374 Nov 2015 CN
1541262 Jun 1969 DE
8515687 Dec 1985 DE
19626230 Jan 1998 DE
19745654 Apr 1999 DE
102005045070 Apr 2007 DE
213290 Nov 2015 DE
0663184 Jul 1995 EP
1905388 Apr 2008 EP
2901991 Dec 2007 FR
2900563 Aug 2008 FR
2892617 Sep 2008 FR
2916622 Sep 2009 FR
2961386 Dec 2011 FR
1274470 Nov 2015 GB
H0956736 Mar 1997 JP
2002500063 Jan 2002 JP
WO1998044858 Oct 1998 WO
WO1999051160 Oct 1999 WO
WO2001024697 Apr 2001 WO
WO2001045485 Jun 2001 WO
WO2001045487 Jun 2001 WO
WO2001067973 Sep 2001 WO
WO2001078614 Oct 2001 WO
WO2007013059 Feb 2007 WO
WO2007015239 Feb 2007 WO
WO2011116158 Sep 2011 WO
WO2013119528 Aug 2013 WO
WO2014040013 Mar 2014 WO
WO0234131 Nov 2015 WO
WO2014070681 Nov 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (102)
Entry
Abe et al., “Experimental external fixation combined with percutaneous discectomy in the management of scoliosis.”, SPINE, 1999, pp. 646-653, 24, No. 7.
Ahlbom et al., “Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.”, Health Physics, 1998, pp. 494-522, 74, No. 4.
Amer et al., “Evaluation of treatment of late-onset tibia vara using gradual angulation translation high tibial osteotomy”, ACTA Orthopaedica Belgica, 2010, pp. 360-366, 76, No. 3.
Angrisani et al., “Lap-Band® Rapid Port™ System: Preliminary results in 21 patients”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 936, 15, No. 7.
Baumgart et al., “A fully implantable, programmable distraction nail (Fitbone)—new perspectives for corrective and reconstructive limb surgery.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 189-198.
Baumgart et al., “The bioexpandable prosthesis: A new perspective after resection of malignant bone tumors in children.”, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2005, pp. 452-455, 27, No. 8.
Bodó et al., “Development of a tension-adjustable implant for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.”, Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi—Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, 2008, pp. 27-32, 19, No. 1.
Boudjemline et al., “Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding.”, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006, pp. 1130-1135, 131, No. 5.
Brown et al., “Single port surgery and the Dundee Endocone.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions: Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts, 2007, ETP007, pp. 323-324.
Buchowski et al., “Temporary internal distraction as an aid to correction of severe scoliosis”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, pp. 2035-2041, 88-A, No. 9.
Burghardt et al., “Mechanical failure of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in limb lengthening.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, pp. 639-643, 93-B, No. 5.
Burke, “Design of a minimally invasive non fusion device for the surgical management of scoliosis in the skeletally immature”, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006, pp. 378-384, 123.
Carter et al., “A cumulative damage model for bone fracture.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1985, pp. 84-90, 3, No. 1.
Chapman et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: A systematic literature review.”, Surgery, 2004, pp. 326-351, 135, No. 3.
Cole et al., “Operative technique intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor: Tibial surgical technique.”, Orthofix, 2005.
Cole et al., “The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia.”, Injury, 2001, pp. S-D-129-S-D-139, 32.
Dailey et al., “A novel intramedullary nail for micromotion stimulation of tibial fractures.”, Clinical Biomechanics, 2012, pp. 182-188, 27, No. 2.
Daniels et al., “A new method for continuous intraoperative measurement of Harrington rod loading patterns.”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 1984, pp. 233-246, 12, No. 3.
De Giorgi et al., “Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of severe scoliosis.”, European Spine Journal, 1999, pp. 8-15, No. 1.
Dorsey et al., “The stability of three commercially available implants used in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2006, pp. 95-98, 19, No. 2.
Edeland et al., “Instrumentation for distraction by limited surgery in scoliosis treatment.”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1981, pp. 143-146, 3, No. 2.
Elsebaie, “Single growing rods (Review of 21 cases). Changing the foundations: Does it affect the results?”, Journal of Child Orthop, 2007, 1:258.
Ember et al., “Distraction forces required during growth rod lengthening.”, J of Bone Joint Surg BR, 2006, p. 229, 88-B, No. Suppl. II.
European Patent Office, “Observations by a third party under Article 115 EPC in EP08805612 by Soubeiran.”, dated 2010.
Fabry et al., “A technique for prevention of port complications after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding.”, Obesity Surgery, 2002, pp. 285-288, 12, No. 2.
Fried et al., “In vivo measurements of different gastric band pressures towards the gastric wall at the stoma region.”, Obesity Surgery, 2004, p. 914, 14, No. 7.
Gao et al., CHD7 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis, American Journal of Human Genetics, 2007, pp. 957-965, 80.
Gebhart et al., “Early clinical experience with a custom made growing endoprosthesis in children with malignant bone tumors of the lower extremity actioned by an external permanent magnet; The Phenix M. system”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage. Sep. 3, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Gillespie et al. “Harrington instrumentation without fusion.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1981, p. 461, 63-B, No. 3.
Goodship et al., “Strain rate and timing of stimulation in mechanical modulation of fracture healing.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998, pp. S105-S115, No. 355S.
Grass et al., “Intermittent distracting rod for correction of high neurologic risk congenital scoliosis.”, SPINE, 1997, pp. 1922-1927, 22, No. 16.
Gray, “Gray's anatomy of the human body.”, http://education.yahoo.com/reference/gray/subjects/subject/128, published Jul. 1, 2007.
Grimer et al. “Non-invasive extendable endoprostheses for children—Expensive but worth it!”, International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, 2007.
Grünert, “The development of a totally implantable electronic sphincter.” (translated from the German “Die Entwicklung eines total implantierbaren elektronischen Sphincters”), Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1969, pp. 1170-1174, 325.
Guichet et al. “Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, pp. 838-848, 85-A, No. 5.
Gupta et al., “Non-invasive distal femoral expandable endoprosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in paediatric tumours.”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, pp. 649-654, 88-B, No. 5.
Hankemeier et al., “Limb lengthening with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD).”, Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2005, pp. 79-101, 17, No. 1.
Harrington, “Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1962, pp. 591-610, 44-A, No. 4.
Hennig et al., “The safety and efficacy of a new adjustable plate used for proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy in the treatment of unicompartmental knee osteoarthrosis.”, Journal of Knee Surgery, 2007, pp. 6-14, 20, No. 1.
Hofmeister et al., “Callus distraction with the Albizzia nail.”, Practice of Intramedullary Locked Nails, 2006, pp. 211-215.
Horbach et al., “First experiences with the routine use of the Rapid Port™ system with the Lap-Band®.”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Hyodo et al., “Bone transport using intramedullary fixation and a single flexible traction cable.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996, pp. 256-268, 325.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, “Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields.” Health Physics, 2009, pp. 504-514, 96, No. 4.
INVIS®/Lamello Catalog, 2006, Article No. 68906A001 GB.
Kasliwal et al., “Management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.”, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2013, pp. 275-291, 24, No. 2.
Kenawey et al., “Leg lengthening using intramedullay skeletal kinetic distractor: Results of 57 consecutive applications.”, Injury, 2011, pp. 150-155, 42, No. 2.
Kent et al., “Assessment and correction of femoral mahotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2010, pp. 580-584, 76, No. 5.
Klemme et al., “Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997, pp. 734-742, 17, No. 6.
Korenkov et al., “Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.”, Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, pp. 1068-1071, 17, No. 7.
Krieg et al., “Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008, pp. 189-197, 466, No. 1.
Kucukkaya et al., “The new intramedullary cable bone transport technique.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009, pp. 531-536, 23, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “In vivo band manometry: A new method in band adjustment”, Obesity Surgery, 2005, p. 935, 15, No. 7.
Lechner et al., “Intra-band manometry for band adjustments: The basics”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, pp. 417-418, 16, No. 4.
Li et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail: A case report with histologic examination of the regenerated segment.”, Injury, 1999, pp. 525-534, 30, No. 8.
Lonner, “Emerging minimally invasive technologies for the management of scoliosis.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 431-440, 38, No. 3.
Matthews et al., “Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens.”, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2003, pp. 2211-2216, 29, No. 11.
Micromotion, “Micro Drive Engineering⋅General catalogue.”, 2009, pp. 14-24.
Mineiro et al., “Subcutaneous rodding for progressive spinal curvatures: Early results.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2002, pp. 290-295, 22, No. 3.
Moe et al., “Harrington instrumentation without fusion plus external orthotic support for the treatment of difficult curvature problems in young children.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 35-45, 185.
Montague et al., “Magnetic gear dynamics for servo control.”, Melecon 2010—2010 15th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Valletta, 2010, pp. 1192-1197.
Montague et al., “Servo control of magnetic gears.”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, pp. 269-278, 17, No. 2.
Nachemson et al., “Intravital wireless telemetry of axial forces in Harrington distraction rods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1971, pp. 445-465, 53, No. 3.
Nachlas et al., “The cure of experimental scoliosis by directed growth control.”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1951, pp. 24-34, 33-A, No. 1.
Newton et al., “Fusionless scoliosis correction by anterolateral tethering . . . can it work?.”, 39th Annual Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, 2004.
Oh et al., “Bone transport over an intramedullary nail for reconstruction of long bone defects in tibia.”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2008, pp. 801-808, 128, No. 8.
Ozcivici et al., “Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone.”, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2010, pp. 50-59, 6, No. 1.
Piorkowski et al., Preventing Port Site Inversion in Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding, Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007, 3(2), pp. 159-162, Elsevier; New York, U.S.A.
Prontes, “Longest bone in body.”, eHow.com, 2012.
Rathjen et al., “Clinical and radiographic results after implant removal in idiopathic scoliosis.”, SPINE, 2007, pp. 2184-2188, 32, No. 20.
Ren et al., “Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: Surgical technique”, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2003, pp. 257-263, 13, No. 4.
Reyes-Sanchez et al., “External fixation for dynamic correction of severe scoliosis”, The Spine Journal, 2005, pp. 418-426, 5, No. 4.
Rinsky et al., “Segmental instrumentation without fusion in children with progressive scoliosis.”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 1985, pp. 687-690, 5, No. 6.
Rode et al., “A simple way to adjust bands under radiologic control”, Obesity Surgery, 2006, p. 418, 16, No. 4.
Schmerling et al., “Using the shape recovery of nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis.”, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, pp. 879-892, 10, No. 6.
Scott et al., “Transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments.”, SAGES Annual Scientific Sessions, Poster Abstracts, Apr. 18-22, 2007, P511, p. 306.
Sharke, “The machinery of life”, Mechanical Engineering Magazine, Feb. 2004, Printed from Internet site Oct. 24, 2007 http://www.memagazine.org/contents/current/features/moflife/moflife.html.
Shiha et al., “Ilizarov gradual correction of genu varum deformity in adults.”, Acta Orthop Belg, 2009, pp. 784-791, 75, No. 6.
Simpson et al., “Femoral lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor.”, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, pp. 955-961, 91-B, No. 7.
Smith, “The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity.”, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2007, pp. 547-552, 38, No. 4.
Soubeiran et al. “The Phenix M System, a fully implanted non-invasive lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet. Applications in limb salvage.” International Society of Limb Salvage 14th International Symposium on Limb Salvage, Sep. 13, 2007, Hamburg, Germany. (2 pages).
Soubeiran et al., “The Phenix M System. A fully implanted lengthening device externally controllable through the skin with a palm size permanent magnet; Applications to pediatric orthopaedics”, 6th European Research Conference in Pediatric Orthopaedics, Oct. 6, 2006, Toulouse, France (7 pages).
Stokes et al., “Reducing radiation exposure in early-onset scoliosis surgery patients: Novel use of ultrasonography to measure lengthening in magnetically-controlled growing rods. Prospective validation study and assessment of clinical algorithm”, 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Jul. 11, 2013. Vancouver, Canada. Scoliosis Research Society.
Sun et al., “Masticatory mechanics of a mandibular distraction osteogenesis site: Interfragmentary micromovement.”, Bone, 2007, pp. 188-196, 41, No. 2.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR II. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib II: Technique Guide.”, 2008, 40 pgs.
Synthes Spine, “VEPTR Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib, Patient Guide.”, 2005, 26 pgs.
Takaso et al., “New remote-controlled growing-rod spinal instrumentation possibly applicable for scoliosis in young children.”, Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 1998, pp. 336-340, 3, No. 6.
Teli et al., “Measurement of forces generated during distraction of growing rods.”, Journal of Children's Orthopaedics, 2007, pp. 257-258, 1, No. 4.
Tello, “Harrington instrumentation without arthrodesis and consecutive distraction program for young children with severe spinal deformities: Experience and technical details.”, The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1994, pp. 333-351, 25, No. 2.
Thaller et al., “Limb lengthening with fully implantable magnetically actuated mechanical nails (PHENIX®)—Preliminary results.”, Injury, 2014 (E-published Oct. 28, 2013), pp. S60-S65, 45.
Thompson et al., “Early onset scoliosis: Future directions”, 2007, J Bone Joint Surg Am, pp. 163-166, 89-A, Suppl 1.
Thompson et al., “Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis”, Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 2007, pp. 354-361, 27, No. 3.
Thonse et al., “Limb lengthening with a fully implantable, telescopic, intramedullary nail.”, Operative Techniques in Orthopedics, 2005, pp. 355-362, 15, No. 4.
Trias et al., “Dynamic loads experienced in correction of idiopathic scoliosis using two types of Harrington rods.”, SPINE, 1979, pp. 228-235, 4, No. 3.
Verkerke et al., “An extendable modular endoprosthetic system for bone tumor management in the leg”, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1990, pp. 91-96, 12, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Design of a lengthening element for a modular femur endoprosthetic system”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1989, pp. 97-102, 203, No. 2.
Verkerke et al., “Development and test of an extendable endoprosthesis for bone reconstruction in the leg.”, The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 1994, pp. 155-162, 17, No. 3.
Weiner et al., “Initial clinical experience with telemetrically adjustable gastric banding”, Surgical Technology International, 2005, pp. 63-69, 15.
Wenger, “Spine jack operation in the correction of scoliotic deformity: A direct intrathoracic attack to straighten the laterally bent spine: Preliminary report”, Arch Surg, 1961, pp. 123-132 (901-910), 83, No. 6.
White, III et al., “The clinical biomechanics of scoliosis.”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1976, pp. 100-112, 118.
Yonnet, “A new type of permanent magnet coupling.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1981, pp. 2991-2993, 17, No. 6.
Yonnet, “Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets.”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1978, pp. 803-805, 14, No. 5.
Zheng et al., “Force and torque characteristics for magnetically driven blood pump.”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2002, pp. 292-302, 241, No. 2.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220183913 A1 Jun 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62293755 Feb 2016 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16058750 Aug 2018 US
Child 17689471 US
Parent PCT/US2017/017331 Feb 2017 US
Child 16058750 US