The present invention relates to systems and methods for communicating between medical devices. More specifically, the present invention relates to systems and methods for controlling wireless signal transfers between ultrasound-enabled medical devices.
Implantable medical devices (IMDs) such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators are utilized in monitoring and regulating various conditions within the body. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator, for example, may be utilized in cardiac rhythm management applications to monitor the rate and rhythm of the heart and for delivering various therapies such as cardiac pacing, cardiac defibrillation, and/or cardiac therapy. In some cases, for example, the implantable medical device can be configured to sense various physiological parameters occurring in the atria and/or ventricles of the heart or at other locations to determine the occurrence of any abnormalities in the operation of the heart. Based on these sensed parameters, the medical device may then deliver an appropriate therapy to the patient.
A variety of techniques have been developed for transmitting wireless signals between medical devices located inside or outside of the body. In an ultrasonic approach, for example, each linked medical device can be equipped with an ultrasonic transducer adapted to generate an acoustic signal for providing data communications from one device to another device, to transfer energy from one device to another device, and/or to delivery therapy to a treatment site. One major obstacle limiting the advancement of the ultrasonic approach is the inefficiency of signal transfer from indirect acoustic pathways within the body between ultrasound-enabled devices. In a dynamic, heterogeneous environment such as the human body, for example, optimal signal transfer from one ultrasound-enabled device to another requires appropriately designed transmissions, typically in the form of modulated acoustic signals with compensations for phase and amplitude effects during propagation. Accordingly, there is an ongoing need for systems and methods for improving the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of wireless signal transfers between ultrasound-enabled devices.
The present invention relates to systems and methods for controlling wireless signal transfers between ultrasound-enabled medical devices. An illustrative system includes a source device with a plurality of acoustic transducer elements configured to transmit an acoustic signal, a target device including an acoustic transducer for receiving the acoustic signal from the source device, and a controller configured to determine adjustments to one or more transmission parameters of the source device for increasing the signal coherence at the target device. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to adjust the transmission parameters based on phase delay and/or amplitude differences from acoustic signals transmitted by the target device and received on the transducer elements of the source device.
An illustrative method for controlling the wireless transfer of acoustic signals between ultrasound-enabled medical devices includes initiating a transmission mode of operation in the target device and transmitting one or more acoustic signals from the target device, initiating a reception mode of operation in the source device and receiving one or more acoustic signals from the target device, comparing the acoustic signals received by a plurality of transducer elements of the source device and computing a phase delay parameter for the received acoustic signals, and adjusting one or more transmission parameters of the source device to increase the signal coherence at the target device.
The systems and methods described herein may enable optimal or near-optimal signal transfer over a wide range of operating conditions and in a variety of applications. Applications that can employ the techniques described herein can include, but are not limited to, telemetry communications, energy transfer or delivery, and therapy delivery. In some embodiments, for example, the techniques described herein can be utilized in cardiac rhythm management applications to control acoustic communications between an implantable pulse generator or an external monitoring device and a remote sensor implanted within the body. Other applications are also possible.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
In the illustrative CRM system 10 depicted, the pulse generator 12 is coupled to a lead 32 deployed in the patient's heart 20. As shown, the pulse generator 12 can be implanted subcutaneously within the body, typically at a location such as in the patient's chest or abdomen, although other implantation locations are possible. A proximal portion 34 of the lead 32 can be coupled to or formed integrally with the pulse generator 12. A distal portion 36 of the lead 32, in turn, can be implanted at a desired location within the heart 20 such as in the right ventricle 24, as shown. Although the illustrative system 10 depicts only a single lead 32 inserted into the patient's heart 20, in other embodiments the system 10 may include multiple leads so as to electrically stimulate other areas of the heart. 20. In some embodiments, for example, the distal portion of a second lead (not shown) may be implanted in the right atrium 22 or in the right ventricle 24. In addition, or in lieu, another lead can be implanted at the left side of the heart 20 (e.g., in the left atrium 26 or the left ventricle 28) to stimulate the left side of the heart 20, or can be implanted at other locations such as in the coronary veins (e.g., for biventricular pacing and/or heart failure treatment). Other types of leads such as epicardial leads may also be utilized in addition to, or in lieu of, the lead 32 depicted in
During therapy, the lead 32 can be configured to convey electrical signals between the heart 20 and the pulse generator 12. For example, in those embodiments where the pulse generator 12 is a pacemaker, the lead 32 can be configured to deliver electrical therapeutic stimulus for pacing the heart 20. In those embodiments where the pulse generator 12 is an implantable cardiac defibrillator, the lead 32 can be utilized to delver electric shocks to the heart 20 in response to an event such as ventricular tachycardia. In some embodiments, the pulse generator 12 may include both pacing and defibrillation capabilities.
In the embodiment illustrated in
The remote device 18 can be configured to perform one or more designated functions, including the sensing of physiological parameters within the body. Example physiological parameters that can be measured using the remote device 18 can include, but are not limited to, blood pressure, blood or fluid flow, temperature, and strain. Various electrical, chemical and/or magnetic properties may also be sensed within the body via the remote device 18. The specific configuration and function of the remote device 18 will typically vary depending on the particular diagnostic and therapeutic needs of the patient. In one illustrative embodiment, for example, the remote device 18 includes a pressure sensor that can be implanted at a location deep within the body such as the main pulmonary artery 30 or a branch of the main pulmonary artery 30 (e.g., in the right or left pulmonary artery). Alternatively, the remote device 18 can be implanted at other locations within the body, and can be configured to measure other parameters.
In use, the remote device 18 can be used as part of a system to predict decompensation of a heart failure patient or to optimize pacing and/or defibrillation therapy. The remote device 18 can be configured to transmit an acoustic data signal to the pulse generator 12, to the monitor 18, and/or to other medical devices located inside or outside of the body containing one or more physiological parameters sensed at the implantation location. Based on this information, an indication of any abnormalities within the heart 20 can be determined and an appropriate therapy provided to the patient, as necessary.
The remote device 18 can be tasked either alone or with other implantable devices to provide or regulate various therapies within the body. In certain embodiments, for example, the remote device 18 includes a glucose level sensor that can be used in conjunction with an insulin pump for providing insulin to the patient. In other embodiments, the remote device 18 can comprise a pulmonary sound sensor, a satellite pacing device, or other sensing and/or therapy-delivering device.
As further shown in
The monitor 16 includes multiple acoustic transducer elements 40, which as is discussed further herein, is configured to transmit and receive acoustic signals for establishing an acoustic link between the monitor 16 and the remote device 18, the pulse generator 12, and/or other medical devices inside or outside of the body. In some embodiments, for example, the monitor 16 includes a multi-element transducer (MET) array 42 coupled to a transducer housing 44. In the illustrative embodiment of
The transducer elements 40 may operate at the same frequency, or alternatively, can operate at different frequencies. In one embodiment, for example, each of the transducer elements 40 are configured to operate at a frequency of between about 20 KHz and about 200 KHz. In some embodiments the transducer elements 40 may each operate at a frequency of about 40 KHz. The transducer elements 40 can be configured to resonate at the same frequency, or can be configured to resonate at different frequencies.
During operation, one or more of the transducer elements 40 can be actuated to produce an acoustic wave 46 that is used to establish an acoustic link between the monitor 16 and the remote device 18 for powering the remote device 18, for recharging the remote device 18, and/or for communicating sensor readings from the remote device 18. In some embodiments, the transducer elements 40 can also be used to establish an acoustic link between the monitor 16 and the pulse generator 12, if desired.
The phase delay, and in some cases also the amplitude, of the acoustic signals produced by each of the transducer elements 40 can be controlled by the monitor 16 in order to maximize the phase alignment of the acoustic wave 46 received at the remote device 18. The application of phase delays can be accomplished, for example, using a time-reversal technique with a cross-correlation algorithm that estimates the time-delay between signals from neighboring transducer elements, and then applies a time-reversing or phase-shifting of the signals provided to one or more of the transducer elements in order to align the phases of the acoustic signals received at the remote device 18. Such process of determining the cross-correlation of the signals received by the transducer elements and then applying phase delays to the transducer elements can be used to produce a coherent wave convergent at the remote device 18. This coherence of the acoustic wave can be accomplished, for example, by selecting an acoustic signal received at one transducer element for the monitor 16 as a reference signal and then adjusting the phase delays of the other transducer elements based on the reference signal to maximize the phase alignment of signals from all transducer elements. Alternatively, and in other embodiments, the coherence of the acoustic wave can be accomplished via a moving reference signal by comparing the phase delay for pairs of transducer elements, and then adjusting the phase delays on each of the transducer elements to maximize the phase alignment across all transducer elements.
In some embodiments, the process of analyzing the cross-correlation of the acoustic signals received on the transducer elements and then retransmitting the acoustic wave 46 with phase shifted compensation signals applied to one or more of the transducer elements can be performed iteratively, allowing the monitor 16 to continually or periodically adjust the phase attributes of the acoustic wave 46 in order to optimize the coherence of the acoustic wave 46 at the remote device 18.
In some embodiments, modulating the acoustic wave 46 can be conducted so as to improve the signal strength of the acoustic wave 46 received at the remote device transducer 38. In acoustic powering or recharging applications, for example, the increased signal strength of the acoustic wave 46 received at the transducer 38 increases the amount of electrical energy generated by the transducer 38 for powering the remote device 18 and/or for recharging a battery within the remote device 18. In communication applications, the increased signal strength of the acoustic wave 46 at the transducer 38 results in more accurate and efficient data transmissions back and forth between the remote device 18 and the monitor 16.
In the illustrative embodiment of
During operation, one or more of the transducer elements 62 can be actuated to produce an acoustic wave 66 that can be received by an acoustic transducer 68 of the pulse generator 12. In some embodiments, and as further shown in
In some embodiments, the remote device 18 is configured to transmit a single acoustic wave that can be received by both the pulse generator 12 and the monitor 16. As with those embodiments in which a separate acoustic wave 66,70 is transmitted to each device 12,16 in communication with the remote device 18, the single acoustic wave generated can be modulated to improve signal coherence at each of the communicating devices 12,16, thereby optimizing the signal strength of the acoustic wave received by each device 12,16.
In some embodiments, the acoustic wave 82 generated by the transducer elements 80 can be modulated to improve signal coherence across each of the communicating devices 18,84,86. For example, the acoustic wave 82 generated by the pulse generator 12 can be configured to produce a coherent acoustic wave 82 in order to optimize the signal strength of the acoustic wave 82 received by each of the communicating devices 18,84,86. In other embodiments, the acoustic wave 82 generated by the pulse generator 12 can be configured to optimize the signal strength at one of the implanted medical devices (e.g., the remote sensing device 18) while also permitting communications with one or more of the other implanted medical devices. Other configurations, however, are possible.
The CRM system 74 further includes a second array 92 of transducer elements 94 configured to transmit one or more acoustic waves 96,97,98 within the body that can be received by one or more of the implanted medical devices 18,84,86. In some embodiments, for example, the second array 92 of transducer elements 94 is configured to direct a first acoustic wave 96 that can be received by the remote device 18, a second acoustic wave 97 that can be received by another device 84 implanted within the body, and a third acoustic wave 98 that can be received by yet another device 86 implanted within the body. In the illustrative embodiment of
As with other embodiments described herein, the phase delay, and in some cases also the amplitude, of the acoustic signals produced by each of the second array 92 of transducer elements 94 can be controlled in order to modulate the acoustic waves 96,97,98 within the body. In some embodiments, for example, the modulation of the acoustic waves 96,97,98 can be accomplished using a time-reversal technique to improve the signal strength of the waves 96,97,98 received at the transducers 38,88,90 for each device 18,84,86.
In the illustrative embodiment of
In some embodiments, the source device 100 further includes circuitry 114 that permits the acoustic transducer 108 to operate in both a transmit mode and a receiving mode, allowing the transducer 108 to further receive acoustic signals from the target device 102 and/or other medical devices in communication with the source device 100. In other embodiments, the source device includes separate transducers for transmitting and receiving acoustic signals.
The target device 102 includes a power source 116 for powering the device 102, and a processor/controller 118 for controlling the operation of the device 102 including various hardware and circuitry 120 within the device 102. In those embodiments in which the target device 102 comprises a remote sensor such as a pressure sensor, for example, the processor/controller 118 can be configured to control the hardware and circuitry 120 to sense pressure readings within the body and then transmit those readings as an acoustic signal via the acoustic transducer 112.
The acoustic transducer 112 for the target device 102 includes one or more acoustic transducer elements configured to receive the acoustic wave 110 transmitted by the source device 100, and then convert those signals into electrical signals for further processing by the processor/controller 118. In some embodiments, the acoustic transducer 112 comprises a single transducer element adapted to receive the acoustic wave 110. In other embodiments, the acoustic transducer 112 comprises multiple transducer elements and/or an array of transducer elements. In certain embodiments, the target device 102 further includes circuitry 122 that permits the acoustic transducer 112 to operate in both a transmit mode and a receiving mode, allowing the transducer 112 to further transmit acoustic signals to the source device 100 or other medical devices. In other embodiments, the source device includes separate transducers for transmitting and receiving acoustic signals.
Once configured, the source device may transmit an acoustic initiation signal to the target device (block 128). The acoustic initiation signal may comprise, for example, a series of pulses spaced apart by a predetermined period of time, or a single acoustic pulse having a particular characteristic (e.g., amplitude, frequency, duration, etc.) that can be recognized by the target device as a request to initiate communications with the target device. In certain embodiments, the acoustic initiation signal may comprise a first acoustic pulse followed by a second acoustic pulse spaced apart from the first acoustic pulse by a predetermined period of time (e.g., 1 second). In some embodiments, the acoustic initiation signal can be transmitted to the target device from another medical device located inside or outside of the patient's body. In certain embodiments, the acoustic initiation signal may comprise a signal other than an acoustic signal such as an RF or inductive signal transmitted to the target device from another medical device located inside or outside of the patient's body. In other embodiments, initiation of the target device into a transmission mode of operation can be accomplished via an internal clock or timer signal within the target device.
Upon receiving the initiation signal transmitted by the source device (130), the target device enters into a transmission mode of operation (block 132). In this mode, the target device acts as a beacon, transmitting a number of outward acoustic signals (block 134). The acoustic signals transmitted by the target device can have a predetermined amplitude and duration, or alternatively, can be pulses representing a unique device identification and/or a measured value. In some embodiments, for example, the target device is configured to transmit an acoustic pulse train that is used by the source device to uniquely identify the target device from other devices implanted within the body. Once the target device has transmitted one or more acoustic signals (block 134), the target device may then return to a reception mode of operation to receive acoustic signals from the source device (block 136).
The source device is configured to enter into a reception mode of operation for receiving the acoustic signals transmitted from the target device (block 138). The acoustic signals transmitted from the target device are then received on each element of the multiple element transducer of the source device (block 140). Circuitry within the source device then converts each acoustic signal into corresponding electrical signals.
The processor/controller for the source device receives the electrical signals for each transducer element and then compares the differences in each signal (block 142). In some embodiments, for example, the processor/controller is configured to compute a phase delay parameter and, in some cases also an amplitude parameter, corresponding to each transducer element. From these computed phase delay and/or amplitude parameters, the processor/controller computes one or more compensation factors to adjust the characteristics of the acoustic signal transmitted from the source device to the target device (block 144). In some embodiments, the processor/controller is configured to compute a phase delay parameter to be applied to one or more of the transducer elements in order to maximize the phase alignment of the acoustic signals received at the acoustic transducer for target device. Computing of the phase delay compensation parameters can be accomplished, for example, using a time-reversal technique with a cross-correlation algorithm that estimates the time delays between signals received on neighboring transducer elements and then applies a phase shifting of the signals provided to one or more of the transducer elements based on these time-delay estimates. The computed compensation factors to be applied for each transducer element 50 are then stored within a storage memory of the source device (block 146).
The compensation factors determined for each transducer element can be obtained sequentially or simultaneously. In a sequential approach, the compensations factors can be determined one at a time, requiring multiple transmissions from the target device. In a simultaneous approach, in contrast, the compensation factors can be determined all at once from a single acoustic transmission from the target device. The process of computing phase delay parameters to be applied to the transducer elements can be performed iteratively in some embodiments. For example, the phase delay parameters can be continuously or periodically updated over time, allowing the system to dynamically compensate for any changes in movement of the target and/or source devices (e.g., due to movement from the cardiac or respiratory rhythms or a change in body position).
Once the compensation factors are computed and stored in memory, the source device enters into a transmission mode of operation (block 148) and controls the transmission of acoustic signals to the target device based at least in part on the computed phase delay and/or amplitude compensation factors (block 150). The adjustments to the transmission parameters can include the use of multiple sets of temporally-dependent or event-dependent adjustments. In some embodiments, for example, the processor/controller can be configured to control the transmission of the acoustic signals over a particular time period or based on the occurrence of a particular event such as the detection of patient movement or a change in body position from an accelerometer or other motion sensing device.
With the compensation factors applied to the source device transducer elements, the target device then receives the compensated acoustic signals transmitted by the source device (block 152). The process of iteratively updating the phase delay compensation parameters applied to the transducer elements can be repeated continuously, at predetermined time periods (e.g., once every 5 minutes), or upon the detection of an event (e.g., upon the detection of movement or orientation of the patient).
Based on these compensated factors, the acoustic signals can be transmitted optimally through a complicated path or between unaligned source and target devices in the presence of organs and other obstructions located within the body. In some embodiments, for example, the processor/controller for the source device may apply reverse or time-shifted delays to one or more of the source device transducer elements to produce a coherent acoustic wave at the target device.
The compensation factors can be obtained for both programmed and dynamic tracking use scenarios. If the source device and target device are relatively stationary, a single set of compensation factors can be determined, stored in memory, and then applied successively for future transmissions. If, for example, the source device and target device move cyclically (e.g., in response to cardiac or respiratory rhythms), compensation factors at different portions of the cycle can be computed and utilized. If the source device and target device move within a fixed range, compensation factors at the extremes (e.g., towards the outer periphery of the transducer elements of a transducer array) can be determined and used to create a central average. The compensation factors can be obtained on-demand, prior to each signal transfer session, periodically, or according to changes in an auxiliary signal such as a heart rate signal or a respiration rate signal.
In some embodiments, the processor/controller for the source device can be configured to operate all of the transducer elements simultaneously. In another embodiment, the processor/controller for the source device may determine which transducer element or elements have a low attenuation in the acoustic path to the target device and operate only those transducer elements.
The ability to dynamically modulate the acoustic wave by modification of the phase delay and/or amplitude parameters applied to the transducer elements may increase the efficiency in amplitude-dependent applications such as energy transfer and energy delivery. For acoustic charging applications, for example, the modified acoustic wave may increase the efficiency of the energy transfer and reduce the potential for interruptions due to cardiac or respiratory rhythm induced movement of the target device. In some cases, the ability to modulate the acoustic wave may increase usability of the source device by reducing or eliminating the need to place the device at a precise location in the patient's body, enabling use of the device in a variety of different positions and orientations. The ability to modulate the acoustic wave can also increase the accuracy in signal-to-noise dependent applications such as during data transmissions and communications by reducing energy loss within the body.
The modified acoustic wave generated by the source device transducer elements can be utilized to optimize or near-optimize the transfer of acoustic signals to the target device and perform communications, energy delivery, therapy, or other desired functions within the body. In some embodiments, for example, the modified acoustic wave can be used to optimize the wireless transfer of communications back and forth between the target device and the source device. In addition, in some embodiments the modified acoustic wave can be used to acoustically recharge a battery, power capacitor or other such energy source within the target device. In other embodiments, the modified acoustic wave can be utilized by the target device to provide therapy to one or more treatment sites within the body. In still other embodiments, the acoustic wave produced is configured to create controlled cell and tissue ablation or to induce beneficial biological responses or effects such as thrombi dissolution or tissue stimulation.
Upon receiving the acoustic wave 158, the target device 102 can be configured to enter into a transmission mode of operation. In this mode, and as further shown in
The acoustic transducer 108 for the source device 100 is configured to convert the acoustic signals received at each transducer element into a corresponding electrical signal 162. The electrical signals 162 for each channel 156 are fed to the processor/controller 106, which computes phase delay parameters, and in some cases also amplitude parameters, to be applied to one or more of the transducer elements.
Based at least in part on the computed phase delay and/or amplitude factors, the processor/controller 106 may then apply compensation factors to one or more of the transducer elements during transmission of an acoustic wave towards the target device. As can be further seen in
Various modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this invention also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the described features. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/027,983, filed on Feb. 12, 2008, entitled “Systems and Methods for Controlling Wireless Signal Transfers Between Ultrasound-Enabled Medical Devices,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3310885 | Alderson | Mar 1967 | A |
3320946 | Dethloff et al. | May 1967 | A |
3536836 | Pfeiffer | Oct 1970 | A |
3568661 | Franklin | Mar 1971 | A |
3672352 | Summers | Jun 1972 | A |
3692027 | Ellinwood | Sep 1972 | A |
3757770 | Brayshaw et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3794840 | Scott | Feb 1974 | A |
3943915 | Severson | Mar 1976 | A |
4003379 | Ellinwood | Jan 1977 | A |
4041954 | Ohara | Aug 1977 | A |
4127110 | Bullara | Nov 1978 | A |
4146029 | Ellinwood | Mar 1979 | A |
4223801 | Carlson | Sep 1980 | A |
4227407 | Drost | Oct 1980 | A |
4237900 | Schulman et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4281664 | Duggan | Aug 1981 | A |
4360019 | Portner et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4407296 | Anderson | Oct 1983 | A |
4450527 | Sramek | May 1984 | A |
4480483 | McShane | Nov 1984 | A |
4519401 | Ko et al. | May 1985 | A |
4541431 | Ibrahim et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4543955 | Schroeppel | Oct 1985 | A |
4550370 | Baker | Oct 1985 | A |
4585004 | Brownlee | Apr 1986 | A |
4593703 | Cosman | Jun 1986 | A |
4600855 | Strachan | Jul 1986 | A |
4616640 | Kaali et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4651740 | Schroeppel | Mar 1987 | A |
4653508 | Cosman | Mar 1987 | A |
4660568 | Cosman | Apr 1987 | A |
4676255 | Cosman | Jun 1987 | A |
4677985 | Bro et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4680957 | Dodd | Jul 1987 | A |
4686987 | Salo et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4697595 | Breyer et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4719921 | Chirife | Jan 1988 | A |
4768176 | Kehr et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768177 | Kehr et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4781715 | Wurzel | Nov 1988 | A |
4791936 | Snell et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793825 | Benjamin et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4809697 | Causey, III et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4845503 | Adam et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4846191 | Brockway et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854327 | Kunig | Aug 1989 | A |
4899752 | Cohen | Feb 1990 | A |
4909259 | Tehrani | Mar 1990 | A |
4945914 | Allen | Aug 1990 | A |
4967749 | Cohen | Nov 1990 | A |
4986270 | Cohen | Jan 1991 | A |
4991579 | Allen | Feb 1991 | A |
4995068 | Chou et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4995398 | Turnidge | Feb 1991 | A |
5003976 | Alt | Apr 1991 | A |
5024224 | Engebretson | Jun 1991 | A |
5025795 | Kunig | Jun 1991 | A |
5029582 | Lekholm | Jul 1991 | A |
5040536 | Riff | Aug 1991 | A |
5040538 | Mortazavi | Aug 1991 | A |
5113859 | Funke | May 1992 | A |
5139020 | Koestner et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154171 | Chirife | Oct 1992 | A |
5161536 | Vilkomerson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163429 | Cohen | Nov 1992 | A |
5178151 | Sackner | Jan 1993 | A |
5178153 | Einzig | Jan 1993 | A |
5183051 | Kraidin et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188106 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190035 | Salo et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199428 | Obel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5200891 | Kehr et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213098 | Bennett et al. | May 1993 | A |
5246008 | Mueller | Sep 1993 | A |
5265615 | Frank et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267174 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5277191 | Hughes | Jan 1994 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279607 | Schentag et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289821 | Swartz | Mar 1994 | A |
5300092 | Schaldach | Apr 1994 | A |
5314457 | Jeutter et al. | May 1994 | A |
5329459 | Kaufman et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330505 | Cohen | Jul 1994 | A |
5339051 | Koehler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368040 | Carney | Nov 1994 | A |
5375603 | Feiler | Dec 1994 | A |
5394457 | Leibinger et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5397329 | Allen | Mar 1995 | A |
5400793 | Wesseling | Mar 1995 | A |
5411535 | Fujii et al. | May 1995 | A |
5411551 | Winston et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417717 | Salo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423323 | Orth | Jun 1995 | A |
5423334 | Jordan | Jun 1995 | A |
5438990 | Wahlstrand et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445608 | Chen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5454838 | Vallana et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469859 | Tsoglin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5476488 | Morgan et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5488954 | Sleva et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5490962 | Cima et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5509424 | Al-Ali | Apr 1996 | A |
5528067 | Farb | Jun 1996 | A |
5535752 | Halperin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5558091 | Acker et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562714 | Grevious | Oct 1996 | A |
5564434 | Halperin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571152 | Chen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5604531 | Iddan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5605154 | Ries et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619997 | Kaplan | Apr 1997 | A |
5626630 | Markowitz et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628782 | Myers | May 1997 | A |
5642731 | Kehr | Jul 1997 | A |
5643327 | Dawson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647369 | Petrucelli et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656428 | McAllister et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5704352 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5705753 | Hastings et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5728281 | Holmstrom et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729129 | Acker | Mar 1998 | A |
5733313 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735887 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741316 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749909 | Schroeppel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752235 | Kehr et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752976 | Duffin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755766 | Chastain et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769877 | Barreras, Sr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776324 | Usala | Jul 1998 | A |
5792195 | Carlson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796827 | Coppersmith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797395 | Martin | Aug 1998 | A |
5800478 | Chen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807258 | Cimochowski et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807395 | Mulier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807397 | Barreras | Sep 1998 | A |
5810009 | Mine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810735 | Halperin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832924 | Archibald et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833603 | Kovacs et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835455 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836300 | Mault | Nov 1998 | A |
5843135 | Weijand et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855609 | Knapp | Jan 1999 | A |
5856722 | Haronian et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868673 | Vesely | Feb 1999 | A |
5873835 | Hastings et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5886267 | Ortiz | Mar 1999 | A |
5891180 | Greeninger et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904708 | Goedeke | May 1999 | A |
5911685 | Siess et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919221 | Miesel | Jul 1999 | A |
5941249 | Maynard | Aug 1999 | A |
5954641 | Kehr et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957950 | Mockros et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967986 | Cimochowski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979898 | Pan | Nov 1999 | A |
6002963 | Mouchawar et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023641 | Thompson | Feb 2000 | A |
6024704 | Meador et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6050951 | Friedman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053873 | Govari et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6083248 | Thompson | Jul 2000 | A |
6112116 | Fischell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123861 | Santini, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6140740 | Porat et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141588 | Cox et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152885 | Taepke | Nov 2000 | A |
6155267 | Nelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6161032 | Acker | Dec 2000 | A |
6162238 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171252 | Roberts | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179767 | Ziegler et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185452 | Schulman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198965 | Penner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200265 | Walsh et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234973 | Meador et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236889 | Soykan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237398 | Porat et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239724 | Doron et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248080 | Miesel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256538 | Ekwall | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266567 | Ishikawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273904 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277078 | Porat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278894 | Salo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298267 | Rosborough et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305381 | Weijand et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308099 | Fox et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314323 | Ekwall | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330957 | Bell-Greenstreet | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331163 | Kaplan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368275 | Sliwa et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397661 | Grimes et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409674 | Brockway et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409675 | Turcott | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411850 | Kay et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416474 | Penner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421565 | Hemmingsson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431175 | Penner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432050 | Porat et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438408 | Mulligan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441747 | Khair et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442413 | Silver | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445953 | Bulkes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456883 | Torgerson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471645 | Warkentin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472991 | Schulman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475147 | Yost et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475170 | Doron et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486588 | Doron et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6504286 | Porat et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522914 | Huvelle et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567700 | Turcott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574510 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580946 | Struble | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604000 | Lu | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607485 | Bardy | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609023 | Fischell et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615083 | Kupper | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622049 | Penner et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628989 | Penner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6638231 | Govari et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644322 | Webb | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654638 | Sweeney | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6675049 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6699186 | Wolinsky et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6702847 | DiCarlo | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708061 | Salo et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6708065 | Von Arx et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712772 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6720709 | Porat et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6720887 | Zunti | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733447 | Lai et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6738667 | Deno et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6738671 | Christophersom et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743173 | Penner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758822 | Romano | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6764446 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782810 | Vilo | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783499 | Schwartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792308 | Corbucci | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6792311 | Fox et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805667 | Christopherson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809507 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824512 | Warkentin et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832112 | Bornzin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6840956 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6855115 | Fonseca et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6859665 | Ding et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865419 | Mulligan et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868346 | Larson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869404 | Schulhauser et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6871088 | Chinchoy | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885889 | Chinchoy | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889086 | Mass et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895265 | Silver | May 2005 | B2 |
6907285 | Denker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915162 | Noren et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926670 | Rich et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937900 | Pianca et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6949075 | Hatlesad et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961448 | Nichols et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970742 | Mann et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6978182 | Mazar et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985773 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993393 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003350 | Denker et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7018336 | Enegren et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024248 | Penner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033322 | Silver | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035684 | Lee | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047065 | Kalgren et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048691 | Miele et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060030 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061381 | Forcier et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7088254 | Liebenow | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127290 | Girouard et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130681 | Gebhardt et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134999 | Brauker et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136703 | Cappa et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7160252 | Cho et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181268 | Sheldon et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195594 | Eigler et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198603 | Penner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7200439 | Zdeblick et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203545 | Schmitt et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7204798 | Zdeblick et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209790 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212861 | Park et al | May 2007 | B1 |
7214189 | Zdeblick | May 2007 | B2 |
7236821 | Cates et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248923 | Maile et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7273457 | Penner | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7294105 | Islam | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7335161 | Von Arx et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7399313 | Brown et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7425200 | Brockway et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7452334 | Gianchandani et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7481771 | Fonseca et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7742815 | Salo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20010051766 | Gazdzinski | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010051787 | Haller et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020022785 | Romano | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023123 | Madison | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042561 | Schulman et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045812 | Ben-Haim et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045836 | Alkawwas | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062086 | Miele et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020120204 | Pfeiffer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126036 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147406 | von Segesser | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151770 | Noll, III et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020183628 | Reich et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188323 | Penner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009204 | Amundson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045805 | Sheldon et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060723 | Joo et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030114897 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030136417 | Fonseca et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181794 | Rini et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191383 | Ben-Haim et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199779 | Muhlenberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040032187 | Penner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044393 | Yarden et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064133 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077937 | Yarden | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040122484 | Hatlestad et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122486 | Stahmann et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040152999 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158163 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167416 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172081 | Wang | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050056539 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102002 | Salo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109339 | Stahmann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124904 | Roteliuk | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137490 | Scheiner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149143 | Libbus et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154321 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159639 | Skliar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159789 | Brockway et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182330 | Brockway et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187482 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192637 | Girouard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192844 | Esler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197585 | Brockway et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215887 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242479 | Petisce et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267379 | Pfeiffer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288727 | Penner | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009818 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031378 | Vallapureddy et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064133 | Von Arx et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064134 | Mazar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064142 | Chavan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064143 | Von Arx et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085039 | Hastings et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085041 | Hastings et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085042 | Hastings et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089694 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122522 | Chavan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136004 | Cowan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142651 | Brister et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060167359 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060235323 | Hatib et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070043394 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049977 | Von Arx et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060959 | Salo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129765 | Gilkerson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142727 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142866 | Li et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149890 | Li et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161914 | Zdeblick et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197921 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070282210 | Stern | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282381 | Li et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015421 | Penner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015651 | Ettori et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021333 | Huelskamp | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021972 | Huelskamp et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046037 | Haubrich et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051843 | Li et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071178 | Greenland et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077440 | Doron | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090204163 | Shuros et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228078 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100056931 | Soffer et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100094144 | Doron | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125211 | Stahmann et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100222833 | Salo et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100324378 | Tran et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0897690 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0928598 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1266606 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1169085 | Aug 2004 | EP |
03-034196 | Feb 1991 | JP |
10-055202 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2004528152 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2006-523120 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-519441 | Jul 2007 | JP |
WO8303345 | Oct 1983 | WO |
WO9503086 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO9527531 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO9701986 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9718856 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9732519 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9733513 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO9747236 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9826716 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO9829030 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9917095 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9926530 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO9934453 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9947205 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9955223 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9955225 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9959460 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9966988 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO0016686 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0058744 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0128627 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0156467 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0174278 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0185094 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0203347 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO0232502 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO03002243 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO03096889 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004012808 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004091719 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005000206 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005063332 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005089638 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005118056 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006033812 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006034183 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006045073 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006045074 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006045075 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006069215 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2007030474 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007047287 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO2007070794 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007099533 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008011570 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008011592 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008011593 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008154145 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bourgeois, Maurice J. et al., “Continuous Determination of Beat-to-Beat Stroke vol. from Aortic pressure Pulses in the Dog”, Circulation Research, vol. 39, pp. 15-24 (1976). |
Rozenman, Yoseph et al., “Wireless Acoustic Communication With a Miniature Pressure Sensor in the Pulmonary Artery for Disease Surveillance and Therapy of Patients With Congestive Heart Failure”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49:7, 2007, pp. 784-789. |
Wesseling, KH et al., “Computation of Aortic Flow From Pressure in Humans Using a Nonlinear, Three-Element Model”, Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 74, Issue 5, pp. 2566-2573 (1993). |
B. C. Penney et al., “Simplified electrode array for impedance cardiography,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1985, 23, p. 1-7. |
B. Henderson et al., “Interaction of Photodynamic Therapy and Hyperthermia: Tumor Response and Cell Survival after Treatment of Mice in Vivo,” Cancer Research, vol. 45, 6071 (Dec. 1985). |
Bennett et al., “Subcutaneous pressure measurement as a surrogate for an external pressure reference for chronic implantable pressure monitoring,” Journal of Cardial Failure, Churchill Livingstone, vol. 9, No. 5, p. S51, Oct. 1, 2003, abstract only. |
Bonnefoy E, Ninet J, Robin J, Leroux F, Boissonat P, Brule P, Champsaur G., 1994, Bipolar intramyocardial electrogram from an implanted telemetric pacemaker for the diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 17(11 Pt 2):2052-6. |
C. Hierold et al. (Germany, 1998) “Implantable Low Power Integrated Pressure Sensor System for Minimal Invasive Telemetric Patient Monitoring” IEEE, pp. 568-573. |
Dipl.-Ing. Torsten Eggers et al. (Germany) “Implantable Telemetric Endosytem (ITES)” IMSAS Institut Fur Mikrosensoren-Aktuatoren Und-Systeme, 1998. 2 pp. |
E R. Cosman et al. (Massachussetts, Apr. 1979) “A Telemetric Pressure Sensor for Ventricular Shunt Systems” Surgical Neurology vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 287-294. |
G.W.H. Schurink et al. (1998) “Late Endoleak After Endovascular Therapy for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. vol. 17, pp. 448-450. |
Gerhausser A, Reichel T, Neukomm P A, Bolz A, Hugel J, Schaldach M, 1997, Diagnosis of rejection after kidney transplantation by impedance spectroscopy with an implantable measuring system, Biomed Tech (Berl), 42 Suppl. 160-1. |
GH White et al. (1997) “Endoleak Following Endoluminal Repair of AAA: Management Options and Patient Outcomes”, J. Endovasc Surg, pp. 1-45. |
Graichen et al., “Patient Monitoring System for Load Measurement with Spinal Fixation Devices,” Med. Eng. Phys. 18, (1996), pp. 167-174. |
Haas et al., “Photodynamic Effects of Dyes on Bacteria,” Published in Mutation Research, 1979, vol. 60, pp. 1-11. |
Hashima et al., “Nonhomogenous Analysis of Epicardial Strain Distributions During Acute Myocardial Ischemia in the Dog,” J Biomech 1993, Jan 26: 19-35. |
Hetzer R. et al., 1998, Daily non-invasive rejection monitoring improves long-term survival in pediatric heart transplantation, Ann. Thorac. Surg. (66):1343-1349. |
J.A. Parrish, “Photobiologic Consideration on Photoradiation Therapy,” pp. 91-108, Porphyrin Photosensitization, Plenum Press, (1983). |
K.E. Uhrich et al., “Synthesis and characterization of degradable poly(anhydride-co-imides)”, Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 2184-93. |
Karl E. Richard et al. (Germany, Jan. 1999) “First clinical results with a telemetric shunt-integrated ICP-sensor” Neurological Research vol. 21, pp. 117-120. |
Labrousse and Satre, “Photodynamic Killing of Dictyostelium Discoideum Amoebae Mediated by 4′,5′-Diiodoflurescin Isothiocyanate Dextran. A strategy for the isolation of Thermoconditional Endocytosis Mutants,” published in Photochemistry and Photobiology, 1993, vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 531-537. |
Mackay et al., “Bio-medical Telemetry: Sensing and Transmitting Biological Information from Animals and Man,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York (1970) pp. 244-245. |
Pfitzmann R, Muller J, Grauhan O. Cohnert T, Hetzer R, Z Kardiol, 1998, Measuring bioelectric myocardial impedance as a non invasive method for diagnosis of graft rejection after heart transplantation, 87(4):258-266. |
Pirolo J S, Shuman T S, Brunt E M, Liptay M J, Cox J L, Ferguson T B Jr., J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg, 1992, Noninvasive detection of cardiac allograft rejection by prospective telemetric monitoring, 103(5):969-79. |
Prof. Dr. Johannes Zacheja et al. (Germany, Sep. 1996) “An Implantable Microsystem for Biomedical Applications” Micro System Technologies 96, pp. 717-722. |
S.K. Gupta et al. (1999) “Use of a Piezoelectric Film Sensor for Monitoring Vascular Grafts”, The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 160, pp. 182-186. |
T. Chuter et al. (Sweden, Jan. 1997) “Aneurysm Pressure Following Endovascular Exclusion” Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. vol. 13, pp. 85-87. |
T.A. Cochran et al. (1990) “Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal”, Current Therapy in Adult Medicine, Fourth Edition. |
Z. Tang et al. (May 1995) “Data Transmission from an Implantable Biotelemeter by Load-Shift Keying Using Circuit Configuration Modulator” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 524-528. |
Cohen, T.J. et al., “A Hemodynamically Responsive Antitachycardia System. Development and Basis for Design in Humans”, Circulation 1990, vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 394-406, XP002560584. |
Blacher, Jacques et al., “Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as a Member of Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertensive Patients”, Hypertension May 1999;33;1111-1117. |
Farzaneh-Far, Ramin et al., Usefulness of Noninvasive Estimate of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance to predict Mortality, Heart Failure, and Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (from the Heart and Soul Study), The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 101, Issue 6, Mar. 15, 2008, pp. 762-766. |
El Gamal, M.I.H. et al., “Chronic Ventricular Pacing With Ventriculo-Atrial Conduction Versus Atrial Pacing in Three Patients With Symptomatic Sinus Bradycardia”, PACE, vol. 4, Jan.-Feb. 1981, pp. 100-106. |
Fujiki, Akira et al., “Pacemaker Syndrome Evaluated by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing”, PACE, vol. 13, Oct. 1990, pp. 1236-1241. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2009/033436, mailed May 27, 2009, 12 pages. |
Fink, Mathias, “Time Reversal of Ultrasonic Fields—Part I: Basic Principles”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 39, No. 5, Sep. 1992, pp. 555-566. |
Wu, Francois et al., “Time Reversal of Ultrasonic Fields—Part II: Experimental Results”, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 39, No. 5, Sep. 1992, pp. 567-578. |
Strickberger, S. Adam et al., “Extracardiac Ablation of the Canine Atrioventricular Junction by Use of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound”, Circulation, Jul. 13, 1999; downloaded from circ.ahajournals.org at ACS/GUIDANT on Jan. 4, 2008, pp. 203-208. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090201148 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61027983 | Feb 2008 | US |